JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7719.3980
Year : 2014 | Month : Jan | Volume : 8 | Issue : 1 Full Version Page : 316 - 321

Recent Advances in Pulp Capping Materials: An Overview

Asma Qureshi1, Soujanya E.2, Nandakumar3, Pratapkumar4, Sambashivarao2

1 Senior Lecturer, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2 Senior Lecturer, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
3 Professor & HOD, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
4 Professor, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
5 Reader, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Asma Qureshi, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Phone: 07893191667,
E-mail: asmakuresh@gmail.com
Abstract

Emphasis has shifted from the “doomed” organ concept of an exposed pulp to one of hope and recovery. The era of vital-pulp therapy has been greatly enhanced with the introduction of various pulp capping materials. The aim of this article is to summarize and discuss about the various and newer pulp capping materials used for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.

Keywords

Introduction

Historically, the first pulp capping procedure was performed in 1756, by the Phillip pfaff, who packed a small piece of gold over an exposed vital pulp to promote healing. However, the success of the pulp capping procedure greatly depends upon the circumstances under which it is performed and the prognosis depends upon the age, type, site and size of pulp exposure. In addition to this the pulp capping material should have the following ideal properties like

Stimulate reparative dentin formation

Maintain pulpal vitality

Release fluoride to prevent secondary caries

Bactericidal or bacteriostatic

Adhere to dentin

Adhere to restorative material

Resist forces during restoration placement and during the life of restoration.

Sterile

Radiopaque

Provide bacterial seal [1].

Calcium Hyroxide

Calcium hydroxide (Ca (OH)2) was introduced to the dental profession in 1921 by Hermann and has been considered the “gold standard” of direct pulp capping materials for several decades, against which new materials should be, tested [24].

Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) Cement

Tronstad and Mjör stated that ZOE cement is more beneficial for inflamed and exposed pulp. However in the literature Glass and Zander, Hembree and Andrews, Watts, Holland et al., found that ZOE, in direct contact with the pulp tissue, produced chronic inflammation, lack of calcific barrier, and end result is necrosis [5].

Corticosteroids and Antibiotics

Corticosteroids like hydrocortisone, cleocin, cortisone, Ledermix (calcium hydroxide plus prednisolone), penicillin, neomycin and Keflin (cephalothin sodium) along with calcium hydroxide was used for pulp capping with the thought of reducing or preventing pulp inflammation.

Gardner DE et al., found that vancomycin, in combination with calcium hydroxide was somewhat more effective than calcium hydroxide used alone and stimulated a more regular reparative dentin bridge. Watts A and Paterson RC cautioned that anti-inflammatory compounds should not be used in patients at risk from bacteremia [6,7].

Polycarboxylate Cement

McWalter GM et al., found that it lacks an antibacterial effect and calcific bridge formation [8].

Inert Materials

Bhaskar SN et al., and Heys DR et al., investigated isobutyl cyanoacrylate and tricalcium phosphate ceramic as direct pulp capping materials. Although pulpal response in the form of reduced inflammation and unpredictable dentin bridging were found, but none of these materials have been promoted to the dental profession as a viable technique [9,10].

Collagen

Dick HM and Carmichael DJ reported that collagen fibers are less irritating than Ca (OH)2 and promotes mineralisation but does not help in thick dentin bridge formation [11].

Bonding Agents

According to Miyakoshi et al., 4-META-MMA-TBB adhesives and hybridizing dentin bonding agents provide superior adhesion to peripheral hard tissues and effective seal against micro leakage. But they have poor outcome due to its cytotoxic effect and absence of calcific bridge formation [12].

Calcium Phosphate

Calcium phosphate cement was suggested as viable alternative because of its good biocompatibility, superior compressive strength and its transformation into hydroxyapatite over time. Yoshimine Y and Maeda K, demonstrated that in contrast to calcium hydroxide, tetracalcium phosphate cement induced bridge formation with no superficial tissue necrosis and significant absence of pulp inflammation [13].

Hydroxyapatite

It is the most thermo dynamically stable of the synthetic calcium phosphate ceramics. It has good biocompatibility with neutral pH -7.0. It can be used as scaffolding for the newly formed mineralized tissue [14].

Lasers

Melcer et al., suggested between the years 1985 and 1987 that the carbon dioxide (CO2) (1W) laser used for direct pulp capping [1517].

Yasuda Y, et al., did a study to examine the effect of CO2 laser irradiation on mineralization in dental pulp cells in rats and the results suggested that CO2 laser irradiation stimulated mineralization in dental pulp cells [18].

Neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser emits an infrared beam at a wavelength of 1064nm can be of therapeutic benefit for direct pulp capping and pulpotomy in clinical practice [19].

Glass Ionomer/Resin Modified Glass Ionomer

Glass ionomer also provides an excellent bacterial seal and good biocompatibility when used in close approximation but not in direct contact with the pulp.

RMGIC as direct pulp capping agent exhibited chronic inflammation and lack of dentin bridge formation; whereas the calcium hydroxide control groups showed significantly better pulpal healing [20].

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)

MTA was introduced by Torabinejad in early 1900s. Several studies reported that MTA induced less pulpal inflammation and more predictable hard tissue barrier formation in comparison to hard setting calcium hydroxide [21].

MTYA1-Ca

Atsuko Niinuma developed resinous direct pulp capping agent containing calcium hydroxide. The powder composed of 89.0% microfiller, 10.0% calcium hydroxide and 1.0% benzoyl peroxide was mixed with liquid (67.5% triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate, 30.0% glyceryl methacrylate, 1.0% o-methacryloyl tyrosine amide, 1.0% dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate and 0.5% camphorquinone).

MTYA1-Ca developed dentine bridge formation without formation of a necrotic layer, revealed to have good physical properties, and was not inferior to Dycal histopathologically. Therefore, it is suggested that the newly developed material, MTYA1-Ca promises to be a good direct pulp capping material [22].

Growth Factors

Growth factors regulate growth and development and induce wound healing and tissue regeneration.

Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP)

BMP belongs to super family Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF-β). TGF β is a potent modulator of tissue repair in different situations. BMP-2, 4, and 7 plays a role in the differentiation of adult pulp cells into odontoblasts during pulpal healing.

Lianjia Y et al., found that BMPs are responsible for dentinogenesis, inducing non differentiated mesenchymal cells from the pulp to form odontoblast-like cells, obtaining osteodentin and tubular dentin deposition, when used as direct protectors [23].

Recombinant Insulin Like Growth Factor-I

Lovschall H, et al., evaluated recombinant insulin like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) in rat molars and concluded that dentin bridge formation was equal to dycal after 28 days [24].

Other Growth Factors

Hu CC et al., evaluated the various growth factors like epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor II, platelet-derived growth factor-BB, TGF-β 1in rat molars and concluded that only TGF-β 1-enhances reparative dentin formation [25].

Bonesialoprotein

According to Goldberg M et al., Bone Sialoprotein (BSP) was the most efficient bioactive molecule, which induced homogeneous and well mineralized reparative dentin. Both BSP and BMP-7 were superior to calcium hydroxide in their mineralization inducing properties [26].

Biodentin

Biodentine is new bioactive cement with dentin like mechanical properties and can be used as dentin substitute. It has a positive effect on vital pulp cells and stimulates tertiary dentin formation [27].

Enzymes

Heme-Oxygenase-1

Heme Oxygenase-1(HO) is the rate limiting enzyme in heme catabolism. Odontoblasts and oxidatively stressed dental pulp cells express HO-1, indicates that the pulp might respond to oxidative stress at the molecular level.

HO-1 induction protects against hypoxic stress and nitric oxide-mediated cytotoxicity. It has been reported that HO-1 might play a cytoprotective role against pro inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide in human pulp cells. In addition, bismuth oxide containing Portland cement (BPC) induced HO-1 expression in dental pulp cells plays a protective role against the cytotoxic effects of BPC [28].

Simvastatin

It is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme, a reductase inhibitor and first line drug for hyperlipidemia. Statin improves the osteoblast function via the BMP-2 pathway and suppresses osteoclast function, resulting in enhanced bone formation. Therefore, statin might improve the function of odontoblasts, thus leading to improved dentin formation.

Statin is known to induce angiogenesis and increase neuronal cells, indicating the possible effectiveness of statin in pulp regeneration along with dentin regeneration. It has an anti-inflammatory effect in various tissues, so it is considered as an ideal active ingredient in pulp capping material to accelerate reparative dentin formation [29].

Stem Cells

Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs) and Stem cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth (SHED) have been identified as a novel population of stem cells that have the capacity of self-renewel and multi lineage differentiation.

Nakamura S et al., used mesenchymal stem cells for clinical application in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In this study, they compared the proliferation and stem cell marker of SHED, DSPCs and Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BMMSCs). In addition, gene expression profile of DSPCs and SHED were analyzed by using DNA microarray. They concluded that SHED has got significantly higher proliferation rate than that of DSPCs and BMMSCs and this could be a desirable option as a cell source for therapeutic applications [30].

Propolis (Russian penicillin)

It contains flavonoids, phenolics, iron, zinc and other various aromatic compounds [31].

Parolia A, et al., compared propolis, MTA and Dycal histologically in human dental pulp and concluded that Propolis and MTA showed similar bridge formation when compared to Dycal [32].

Novel Endodontic Cement (NEC)

NEC consists of calcium oxide, calcium phosphate, calcium carbonate, calcium silicate, calcium sulfate, and calcium chloride.

Zarrabi MH et al., evaluated MTA and NEC histologically in human dental pulp and concluded that NEC induced a thicker dentinal bridge with less pulp inflammation [33].

Emdogain (EMD)

EMD is enamel matrix derivative secreted from Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath during porcine tooth development. It is an important regulator of enamel mineralization and plays an important role during periodontal tissue formation. It stimulates the regeneration of acellular cementum, periodontal ligaments, and alveolar bone.

EMD contains BMP like molecules and BMP expressing cells. BMP like molecules in EMD promote odontoblast differentiation and reparative dentin formation. Recently,it was reported that EMD suppresses the inflammatory cytokine production by immunocytes and contains TGF-β like molecules. It might create a favourable environment for promoting wound healing in the injured pulp tissues [34].

Nakamura Y et al., concluded that amount of hard tissue formed in EMD treated teeth was more than twice that of the calcium hydroxide treated control teeth [35].

Al-Hezaimi K et al., evaluated Calcium hydroxide, ProRoot White MTA and white Portland cement after EMD application on the exposed pulp. MTA produced a better quality reparative hard tissue response with the adjunctive use of EMD compared with calcium hydroxide [36].

Odontogenic Ameloblast Associated Protein (ODAM)

ODAM is expressed in ameloblasts, odontoblasts, and pulpal cells. ODAM involved in ameloblast maturation and enamel mineralization.

Yang IS et al., stated that rODAM accelerates reactionary dentin formation close to the pulp exposure area, thereby preserving normal odontoblasts in the remaining pulp [37].

Endo Sequence Root Repair Material

It consists of Calcium silicates, monobasic calcium phosphate, zirconium oxide, tantalum oxide, proprietary fillers and thickening agents [38].

Hirschman WR et al., compared cytotoxicity of MTA-Angelus, Brasseler Endosequence Root Repair Putty (ERRP), Dycal and Ultra-blend Plus (UBP)-(light curable Ca(OH)2) and concluded that ERRP and UBP are less cytotoxic [39].

Castor Oil Bean (COB) Cement

The COB consists of 81-96% triglyceride of ricinoleic acid, and is considered a natural polyol containing three hydroxyl radicals. COB or RCP (Ricinus Communis Polyurethane) was originally developed as a biomaterial for bone repair and regeneration after local bone damage. Due to these positive characteristics, the material is considered to be an excellent candidate for use in pulp capping [40].

TheraCal

TheraCal LC is a light cured, resin modified calcium silicate filled liner designed for use in direct and indirect pulp capping, as a protective base/liner under composites, amalgams, cements, and other base materials. TheraCal LC performs as an insulator/barrier and protectant of the dental pulpal complex.

The proprietary formulation of TheraCal LC consists of tricalcium silicate particles in a hydrophilic monomer that provides significant calcium release making it a uniquely stable and durable material as a liner or base. Calcium release stimulates hydroxy apatite and secondary dentin bridge formation. TheraCal LC may be placed directly on pulpal exposures after hemostasis is obtained. It is indicated for any pulpal exposures, including carious exposures, mechanical exposures or exposures due to trauma. [Table/Fig-1] shows the physical properties of TheraCal LC.

Shows physical properties of Theracal LC

Physical Properties
Shear bond strength(Mpa)Water solubility (μg/mm2)Radiopacity (mm Al)Calcium release
Theracal LC4.35 (2.93)02.63188 (μg/cm2)
Prisma VLC Dycal0.94 (0.92)110 (17)0.79NA

Gandolfi MG et al., compared chemico physical properties of TheraCal, ProRoot MTA and Dycal and concluded that TheraCal displayed higher calcium releasing ability and lower solubility than either ProRoot MTA or Dycal. The capability of TheraCal to be cured to a depth of 1.7 mm may avoid the risk of untimely dissolution. These properties offer major advantages in direct pulp capping treat- ments [41]. [Table/Fig-2] shows the summary of advantages and disadvantages of various pulp capping agents.

Shows the summary of advantages and disadvantages of various pulp capping agents

Pulp capping agentAdvantagesDisadvantages
Ca (OH)2 (1960’s)

Gold standard of direct pulp capping material

Excellent antibacterial properties

Induction of mineralization

Low cytotoxicity

Highly soluble in oral fluids

Subject to dissolution over time

Extensive dentin formation obliterating the pulp chamber

Lack of adhesion

Degradation after acid etching

Presence of tunnels in reparative dentin

Zinc oxide eugenol cement (1960-70’s)

Reduces inflammation

Lack of calcific bridge formation

Releases eugenol in high concentration which is cytotoxic

Demonstrate interfacial leakage

Corticosteroids and antibiotics (1970’s)

Reduces pulp inflammation

Vanocmycin + Ca(OH)2 stimulated a more regular reparative dentin bridge.

Should not be used in patients at risk from bacteremia.

Polycarboxylate cement (1970’s)

Chemically bond to the tooth structure

Lack of antibacterial effect

Fail to stimulate calcific bridge formation

Inert materials (1970’s) (Isobutyl cyanoacrylate and Tri calcium phosphate ceramic)

Reduces pulp inflammation

Stimulate dentin bridge formation

None of these materials havebeen promoted to the dental profession as a viabletechnique

Collagen (1980)

Less irritating than

Ca (OH)2 and promotes mineralisation

Does not help in thick dentin bridge formation

Bonding agents (1995) 4-META-MMA-TBB adhesives and hybridizing dentin bonding agents

Superior adhesion to hard tissues

Effective seal against microleakage.

Have cytotoxic effect

Absence of calcific bridge formation

In vivo studies have demonstrated that the application of an adhesive resin directly onto a site of pulp exposure, or to a thin layer of dentin (less than 0.5 mm), causes dilatation and congestion of blood vessels as well as chronic inflammatory pulpal response

Calcium phosphate (1900’s)

Helps in bridge formation with no superficial tissue necrosis

significant absence of pulp inflammation compared to Ca(OH)2

Good physical properties

Clinical trials are necessary to evaluate this material

Hydroxyapatite (1995)

Biocompatible

Act as scaffold for the newly formed mineralized tissue

Mild inflammation with superficial necrosis of pulp

Lasers (1995-2010) CO2 Nd: YAG

Formation of secondary dentin

sterilization of targeted tissue

Bactericidal effects

Technique sensitive

Causes thermal damage to pulp in high doses

Technique sensitive

Causes thermal damage to pulp in high doses

Glass ionomer/Resin modified glass ionomer (1995)

Excellent bacterial seal

Fluoride release, coefficient of thermal expansion and modulus of elasticity similar to dentin

Bond to both enamel and dentin

Good biocompatibility

Causes chronic inflammation

Lack of dentin bridge formation

Cytotoxic when in direct cell contact

Poor physical properties, high solubility and slow setting rate

RMGIC is more cytotoxic than conventional GIC, so it should not be applied directly to the pulp tissue

Mineral trioxide aggregate (1996-2008)

Good biocompatibility

Less pulpal inflammation

More predictable hard tissue barrier formation in comparison to calcium hydroxide

Antibacterial property

Radiopacity

Releases bioactive dentin matrix proteins

More expensive

Poor handling characterstics

Long setting time

Grey MTA causes tooth discoloration

Two step procedure

High solubility

MTYA1-Ca (1999)

Helps in dentine bridge formation without formation of a necrotic layer

Shear bond strength is higher than conventional GIC and similar to RMGIC

Dentin bridge formation without reduction of pulp space in MTYA1-Ca, but there is reduction of pulp space is seen in dycal.

Better adhesion to dentine

Presence of 10% Ca(OH)2 interferes with complete curing of material, residual monomers causes cytotoxicity

Growthfactors (1900-2007) Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP 2,4,7) Recombinant insulin like growth factor-I Other growth factors (1998) Epidermal growth factor Fibroblast growth factor Insulin like growth factor II Platelet-derived growth factor-BB TGF-β 1

Formation of osteodentin and tubular dentin

Formation of more homogeneous reparative dentin

Superior to Ca(OH)2 in the mineralization inducing properties

Dentin bridge formation was equal to dycal after 28 days

Only TGF-β1 induced reparative dentin formation

Possibility of unexpected side effects and the production

cost can be obstacles for their clinical application

Fail to stimulate reparative dentin in inflamed pulp

Half life is less

High concentration is required

Delivery vechicles used for the molecules show potent effects at the pictogram level and appropriate carriers will be required to facilitate their handling in the clinical situation

Appropriate dose response is required to avoid uncontrolled obliteration of pulp chamber

Possibility of immunological problems due to repeated implantation of active molecules

Other factors does not induced reparative dentin formation

Bonesialoprotein (2000)

Induced homogeneous and well mineralized reparative dentin

Superior to Ca(OH)2 in the mineralization inducing properties

Further clinical studies are needed

Biodentin (2000)

Biocompatible

Good antimicrobial activity.

Stimulate tertiary dentin formation

Stronger mechanically, less soluble and produces tighter seals compared to Ca(OH)2

Less setting time, good handling characteristics than MTA

More long-term

clinical studies are needed for a definitive evaluation of Biodentine

ENZYMES Heme-Oxygenase-1 (2008) Simvastatin (2009)

Play a cytoprotective role against pro inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide in human pulp cells

Prevent H2O2 induced cytotoxicity and oxidative stress in human dental pulp cells.

Anti inflammatory action

Induction of angiogenesis

Improve the function of odontoblasts, thus leading to improved dentin formation

Further in vitro and in vivo studies are required

In high concentration causes pulp tissue damage.

Careful evaluation is required before clinical application to determine the suitable concentration when applied indirectly to a cavity or directly to pulp tissue.

STEM CELLS (2009) Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED)

Regeneration of dentin-pulp complex

SHED is superior to DPSCs

Less economic

Technique sensitive

Propolis (2005-2010)

Antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties

Superior bridge formation compared to Dycal, similar results to MTA

Forms dental pulp collagen, reduces both pulp inflammation and degeneration.

Stimulate reparative dentin formation

Showed mild / moderate inflammation after 2,4 weeks with partial dentinal bridge formation.

Novel endodontic cement (2010)

Biocompatible

Shorter setting time

Do not cause tooth staining

Good handling characteristics compared to MTA

Induced a thicker dentinal bridge with less pulp inflammation than MTA

Further assessment is required for evaluation of pulp response to this material in inflamed pulp.

Emdogain (2001-2011)

Promote odontoblast differentiation and reparative dentin formation

Suppresses the inflammatory cytokine production and create a favourable environment for promoting wound healing in the injured pulp tissues

Amount of hard tissue formed in EMD treated teeth was twice that of the calcium hydroxide

Post operative symptoms were less

MTA produced a better quality reparative hard tissue response with the adjunctive use of Emdogain compared with calcium hydroxide

EMD gel (EMD dissolved in propylene glycol alginate gel) when applied on exposed pulps without the adjunctive use of a pulp-capping material was proven to be ineffective in producing a hard tissue barrier because of its poor sealing qualities.

Clinical advantages of using EMD are unproven

Odontogenic ameloblast associated protein (2010)

Biocompatible

Accelerates reactionary dentin formation

Normal pulp tissue appearance withoutexcessive tertiary dentin formation and obliteration of the pulp cavity compared to MTA

Till now only in vitro study was conducted.

Further studies containing

a larger number of samples and longer follow-up assessments with various studies with higher primates should be followed

Endo sequence root repair material (2010-11)

Antibacterial property

Less cytotoxic than MTA, Dycal and light cure Ca(OH)2

Bioactivity of the cells as well as ALP activity were decreased gradually when exposed to ERRM

Castor oil bean cement (2010-11)

Good antibacterial property

Less cytotoxic

It showed less inflammatory response in subcutaneous tissue of rats when compared with calcium hydroxide cement.

Facilitates tissue healing

Better sealing ability than MTA & GIC

Good mechanical properties

Low cost

Bio inert rather than bioactive

Further clinical trials are required

Theracal (2012)

Act as protectant of the dental pulpal complex

Bond to deep moist dentin

Used as a replacement for Ca(OH)2, glass ionomer, RMGI, IRM/ZOE and other restorative materials

Have strong physical properties,no solubility, high radiopacity

TheraCal displayed higher calcium releasing ability and lower solubility than either ProRoot MTA or Dycal

It is opaque and “whitish” in color, it should be kept thin so as not to show through composite materials that are very translucent affecting final restoration shading


Conclusion

Clarity on the biology of caries, comprehension of technological advances and conviction about improved restorative materials has initiated a pulp preservation that indeed is a boon to the clinician and the patient.

References

[1]Cohen BD, Combe EC, Development of new adhesive pulp capping materials Dent Update 1994 21(2):57-62.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Cox CF, Subay RK, Ostro E, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Tunnel defects in dentin bridges: Their formation following direct pulp capping Oper Dent 1996 21(1):4-11.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Schröder U, Effects of calcium hydroxide-containing pulp-capping agents on pulp cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation J Dent Res 1985 64:541-8.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Cox CF, Suzuki S, Re-evaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners vs. cohesive hybridization J Am Dent Assoc 1994 125(7):823-31.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Dummett CO, Kopel HM, Pediatric Endodontics. In Ingle and Bakland 2002 5th edEndodonticsB.C. Decker Elsevier:861-902.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Gardner DE, Mitchell DF, Mcdonald RE, Treatment of pulps of monkey with vancomycin and calcium hydroxide JDR 1971 50:1273  [Google Scholar]

[7]Watts A, Paterson RC, Cellular responses in dental pulp: A review International Endodontic Journal 1981 14:10-12.  [Google Scholar]

[8]McWalter GM, el-Kafrawy AH, Mitchell DF, Long-term study of pulp capping in monkeys with threeagents J Am Dent Assoc 1976 93(1):105-10.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Bhaskar SN, Beasley JD, Ward JP, Cutright DE, Human pulp capping with isobutyl cyanoacrylate J Dent Res 1972 :50-51.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Heys DR, Cox CF, Heys RJ, Avery JK, Histopathological considerations of direct pulp capping agents J Dent Res 1981 60:1371-79.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Dick HM, Carmichael DJ, Reconstituted antigen-poor collagen preparations as potential pulp-capping agents J Endod 1980 6(7):641-4.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Miyokoshi S, Interfacial interactions of 4-META-MMA/TBB resin and pulp (abstract) JCDR 1993 72:220  [Google Scholar]

[13]Yoshimine Y, Maeda K, Histologic evaluation of tetracalcium phosphate-based cement as a direct pulp-capping agent Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995 79(3):351-8.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Hayashi Y, Imai M, Yanagiguchi K, Viloria IL, Ikeda T, Hydroxyapatite applied as direct pulp capping medicine substitutes for osteodentin J Endod 1999 25(4):225-9.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Melcer J, Chaumette MT, Melcer F, Experimental research on the preparation of dentin-pulp tissue of teeth exposed to CO2 laser beams in dogs and macaques (Macaca/mulatta and Macaca fascicularis) C R Soc Biol (Paris) 1985 179:577-85.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Melcer J, Latest treatment in dentistry by means of the CO2 laser beam Lasers Surg Med 1986 6:396-8.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Melcer J, Chaumette MT, Melcer F, Dental pulp exposed to the CO2 laser beam Lasers Surg Med 1987 7:347-52.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Yasuda Y, Ohtomo E, Tsukuba T, Okamoto K, Saito T, Carbon dioxide laser irradiation stimulates mineralization in rat dental pulp cells Int Endod J 2009 42(10):940-6.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Shiba H, Tsuda H, Kajiya M, Fujita T, Takeda K, Hino T, Neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser irradiation abolishes the increase in interleukin-6 levels caused by peptidoglycan through the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in human pulp cells J Endod 2009 35(3):373-6.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Tarmin B, Hafez AA, Cox CF, Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps Quintessence Int 1998 29(8):535-42.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Bogen G, Kim JS, Bakland LK, Direct pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: an observational study J Am Dent Assoc 2008 139(3):305-15.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Niinuma A, Newly developed resinous direct pulp capping agent containing calcium hydroxide (MTYA1-Ca) Int Endod J 1999 32(6):475-83.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Lianjia Y, Yuhao G, White FH, Bovine bone morphogenetic protein-induced dentinogenesis Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993 (295):305-12.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Lovschall H, Fejerskov O, Flyvbjerg A, Pulp-capping with recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) in rat molars Adv Dent Res 2001 15:108-12.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Hu CC, Zhang C, Qian Q, Tatum NB, Reparative dentin formation in rat molars after direct pulp capping with growth factors J Endod 1998 24(11):744-51.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Goldberg M, Six N, Decup F, Buch D, Soheili Majd E, Lasfargues JJ, Application of bioactive molecules in pulp-capping situations Adv Dent Res 2001 15:91-5.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Laurent P, Camps J, de Méo M, Déjou J, About I, Induction of specific cell resonses to a Ca3SiO5-based posterior restorative material Dent Mater 2008 24(11):1486-94.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Min KS, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Lee SK, Kim HR, Pae HO, Hydrogen peroxide induces heme oxygenase-1 and dentin sialophosphoprotein mRNA in human pulp cells J Endod 2008 34(8):983-9.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Okamoto Y, Sonoyama W, Ono M, Akiyama K, Fujisawa T, Oshima M, Simvastatin induces the odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells in vitro and in vivo J Endod 2009 35(3):367-72.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Nakamura S, Yamada Y, Katagiri W, Sugito T, Ito K, Ueda M, Stem cell proliferation pathways comparison between human exfoliated deciduous teeth and dental pulp stem cells by gene expression profile from promising dental pulp J Endod 2009 35(11):1536-42.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Sabir A, Tabbu CR, Agustiono P, Sosroseno W, Histological analysis of rat dental pulp tissue capped with propolis J Oral Sci 2005 47(3):135-8.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Parolia A, Kundabala M, Rao NN, Acharya SR, Agrawal P, Mohan M, A comparative histological analysis of human pulp following direct pulp capping with Propolis, mineral trioxide aggregate and Dycal Aust Dent J 2010 55(1):59-64.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Zarrabi MH, Javidi M, Jafarian AH, Joushan B, Histologic assessment of human pulp response to capping with mineral trioxide aggregate and novel endodontic cement J Endod 2010 36(11):1778-81.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Kaida H, Hamachi T, Anan H, Maeda K, Wound healing process of injured pulp tissues with emdogain gel J Endod 2008 34(1):26-30.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Nakamura Y, Hammarström L, Lundberg E, Ekdahl H, Matsumoto K, Gestrelius S, Enamel matrix derivative promotes reparative processes in the dental pulp Adv Dent Res 2001 15:105-7.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Tayar BA, Bajuaifer YS, Salameh Z, Al-Fouzan K, Tay FR, A hybrid approach to direct pulp capping by using emdogain with a capping material J Endod 2011 37(5):667-72.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Yang IS, Lee DS, Park JT, Kim HJ, Son HH, Park JC, Tertiary dentin formation after direct pulp capping with odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein in rat teeth J Endod 2010 36(12):1956-62.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Damas BA, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Hoen MM, Cytotoxicity comparison of mineral trioxide aggregates and EndoSequence bioceramic root repair materials J Endod 2011 37(3):372-5.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Hirschman WR, Wheater MA, Bringas JS, Hoen MM, Cytotoxicity comparison of three current direct pulp-capping agents with a new bioceramic root repair putty J Endod 2012 38(3):385-8.  [Google Scholar]

[40]Camargo SE, Camargo CH, Hiller KA, Rode SM, Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of pulp capping materials in two cell lines Int Endod J 2009 42(3):227-37.  [Google Scholar]

[41]Gandolfi MG, Siboni F, Prati C, Chemical-physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light-curable MTA-like material for pulp capping Int Endod J 2012 45(6):571-9.  [Google Scholar]