JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6760.3885
Year : 2013 | Month : Dec | Volume : 7 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : 2759 - 2764

A Drug Utilization Study of Psychotropic Drugs Prescribed in the Psychiatry Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital

Karan B. Thakkar1, Mangal M. Jain2, Gauri Billa3, Abhijit Joshi4, Akash A. Khobragade5

1 Resident Doctor, Department of Pharmacology, Grant Medical College & Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Grant Medical College & Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
3 Resident Doctor, Department of Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College & KEM hospital, Mumbai, India.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Grant Medical College & Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India.
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Grant Medical College & Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Karan B. Thakkar, 1302, 13th floor, Arihant Sparsh, Sec-26A, Vashi, Navi Mumbai-400703, India.
Phone: +91 9821521349,
E-mail: karan_thkkr@hotmail.com; drkaranthakkar@outlook.com
Abstract

Background: Psychiatric disorders are one of the major causes of morbidity. Development of newer drugs like SSRIs and atypical antipsychotics has altered the treatment paradigms. Various factors like cost of drugs, local paradigms, etc. play a role in the selection of drug therapy and hence, affect the outcome. Keeping this in mind, we conducted a study to delineate the various drugs used in psychiatric disorders, to find discrepancies, if any, between the actual and the ideal prescribing pattern of psychotropic drugs and to conduct a cost analysis.

Material and Methods: After our institutional ethics committee approved, a retrospective cross divtional drug utilization study of 600 prescriptions was undertaken. Preparation of the protocol and conduct of the study was as per the WHO – DUS and the STROBE guidelines.

Results:Drug use indicators – In 600 prescriptions, 1074 (88.25%) were psychotropic drugs. The utilization from the National and WHO EML was 100% and 90%, respectively. Average number of psychotropic drugs per prescription was 1.79 ± 1.02 (SD). 22.5% of the prescriptions contained psychotropic FDCs. 76.01% of drugs were prescribed by generic name. Percentage of psychotropic drugs prescribed from the hospital drug schedule and psychotropic drugs actually dispensed from the hospital drug store were 73.1% and 62.3%, respectively.

Drug utilization pattern in different psychiatric disorders – Most commonly prescribed drugs for schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, depression and anxiety disorders were trifluoperazine + trihexiphenydyl (63.9%), carbamazepine (17.2%), amitriptyline (34.9%), and diazepam (23.8%), respectively. The least commonly prescribed drugs were levosulpiride (1.7%), lithium (1.3%), bupropion (4.7%) and clozapine (1.9%), respectively. The PDD/DDD ratio of three drugs – haloperidol, pimozide and amitriptyline – was equal to one. The cost borne by the hospital was 116, i.e., 65.2% of the total cost. The cost index of clozapine was 11.2.

Conclusion: Overall, the principles of rational prescribing were followed. The hospital drug schedule should include more SSRIs. The practice of using 1st generation/ typical anti–psychotics as the first line was as per current recommendations. Anti–cholinergics should be used only in selected cases of patients on anti–psychotics. The use of diazepam should be curtailed and it should be used for short term only.

Keywords

Introduction

Therapeutic practice is expected to be primarily based on evidence provided by pre–marketing clinical trials, but complementary data from the post–marketing period are also paramount for improving drug therapy [1]. Drug Utilization Research (DUR) was defined by the WHO in 1977 as “The marketing, distribution, prescription, and use of drugs in a society, with special emphasis on the resulting medical, social and economic implications” [2]. The increased interest in DUR has resulted from recognition of the virtual explosion in the marketing of new drugs, the wide variations in the patterns of drug prescribing and consumption, and the increasing concern about the cost of drugs [1].

Psychiatric disorders form an important public health priority [3, 4]. Of the top ten health conditions contributing to the Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), four are psychiatric disorders [5]. Mental illness is associated with high levels of health service utilization and associated costs, and in developing countries these costs are mostly paid by the patient [6].

For the treatment of psychiatric disorders, a wide array of psychotropic drugs is available [7]. During the past two decades, the development of newer drugs like Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and atypical anti–psychotics have drastically changed the drug therapy protocols.

Keeping this in mind, we conducted this study with the following objectives:

To delineate the various drugs used in psychiatric disorders.

To find discrepancies, if any, between the actual and the ideal prescribing pattern of psychotropic drugs.

To analyze the drug utilization pattern observed and the reason(s) for the deviation(s) observed.

Methodology

Study design and ethical considerations

A retrospective cross-sectional DUS was conducted after Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used in the preparation of protocol and the manuscript [8].

Selection criteria

Prescriptions of patients of both sexes and all ages, suffering from a psychiatric illness and started on at least one psychotropic drug, were selected.

Sample size

Six hundred prescriptions were analyzed as per the WHO recommendations on conducting retrospective DUS from medical databases/registries [9].

Study Procedure

The data of the patients attending the Psychiatry OPD, during the period 1st January 2012 to 31st May 2012, was collected from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) database, thus obviating Hawthorne’s bias, and was recorded in a structured case record form. The sampling frame was fixed as six prescriptions per day, five days a week, during the given sampling period. The six prescriptions were selected as follows:

On day 1, all six prescriptions were chosen from the beginning of the day, on day 2 six prescriptions were chosen from the middle of the day and on day 3, six prescriptions were chosen from the end of the day and so on [9]. In case of OPD holidays, the prescriptions of that day were assigned to the next working day.

Data Analysis

The following data were collected:

Patient details like age, gender and registration number.

Patient diagnosis.

Prescription details like date, number of drugs, names of individual drugs (generic/brand), any Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) prescribed, whether the prescribed drug(s) was available from the hospital pharmacy, dose, dosage form, dosing schedule, and duration of treatment.

The data analysis was done as follows:

Assessment of prescription patterns as per the WHO-INRUD drug use indicators [9].

Pattern of psychotropic drug used as per DUS metrics [2]:

The prescribed drugs were classified according to The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) – Defined Daily Dose (DDD) classification.

The Prescribed Daily Dose (PDD) was calculated by taking the average of the daily doses of the psychotropic drugs as the PDD. The PDD to DDD ratio was then calculated.

Cost analysis

Cost of drugs prescribed from the hospital schedule was calculated based on the rate contract available in hospital drug store. Cost of drugs prescribed from pharmacies outside the hospital, was obtained from the Drug Index (DI): April-Jun 2012 [10].

The cost parameters calculated were average total cost per prescription, percentage of average cost due to psychotropic drugs, average cost borne by the hospital, average cost borne by the patient.

For drugs prescribed from outside pharmacies we calculated the price per 10 tablets/capsules (minimum and maximum, as per DI), average monthly cost (minimum and maximum) which was equal to (PDD/ Dose per tablet) x Price per 10 tablets x 3 and Cost Index (CI) (Maximum price / Minimum price)

Statistical analysis

The level of significance was fixed at 5% (p<0.05) with 95% confidence interval. The Chi–Square test was used and all statistical calculations were carried out with Open Epi: A Web-based Epidemiologic and Statistical Calculator [11].

Results

Characteristics of Study Participants

The percentage of female and male patients was 51.8% and 48.2%, respectively. The relative distribution of different psychiatric disorders in different age groups and genders is shown in [Table/Fig-1]. The age range was 10–70 years with the average age being 33.9 years.

Age and gender wise distribution of psychiatric disorders in a sample of prescriptions of patients (n=600) attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai, India, 1st Jan – 31st May, 2012

Psychiatric disorderAge (years)p–valueGenderp–value
<2020-4041-60>60MF
Schizophrenia and other psychoses (n=180)288454140.0002*102780.003*
Mood disorders (n=238)2714944180.00002*1191190.2
Anxiety disorders (n=101)3260630.00002*32690.0001*
Others (n=81)39111219<0.0000001*35460.2
Total (n=600)12630411654-288312-

The p value was calculated using the Chi–Square test; * p<0.05.


Pattern of psychiatric disorders

Thirty percent of prescriptions were of schizophrenia, 22% of bipolar mood disorders, 17.7% of depression and 16.8% of anxiety disorders. The disorders like – childhood behavioral disorders, dementia, substance abuse disorders and personality disorders – were grouped as ’other psychiatric illnesses’ (13.5%).

Analysis of Prescription Patterns According to Various WHO/ INRUD Drug Use Indicators [Table/Fig-2].

Assessment of the prescription pattern, as per various drug use indicators, in a sample of patients (n=600) attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai India, 1st Jan – 31st May, 2012

Sr.No.Drug use indicatorsResult
1.Average number of drugs per prescription: Mean ± SD2.01 ± 1.03
2.Average number of psychotropic drugs per prescription: Mean ± SD1.79 ± 1.02
3.Percentage of prescriptions containing psychotropic FDCs135/600 (22.5%)
4.Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name925/1217 (76.01%)
6.Percentage of prescriptions with an injection prescribed13/600 (2.2%)
7.Percentage of psychotropic drugs prescribed from the hospital drug schedule785/1074 (73.1%)
8.Percentage of psychotropic drugs actually dispensed from the hospital drug store669/1074 (62.3%)

The 600 prescriptions contained 1217 drugs. Out of these, 1074 were psychotropic drugs. The other drugs commonly co-prescribed were, calcium lactate, vitamin B complex and multivitamins. There was no prescription with more than five drugs. The FDCs prescribed were, trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride 2 mg plus trifluoperazine 5 mg – prescribed to 115 patients and the combination of risperidone 3 mg plus trihexyphenidyl 2 mg – prescribed to 20 patients. The six drugs: trifluoperazine, diazepam, haloperidol, risperidone, carbamazepine and amitriptyline accounted for about 50% of all the drugs prescribed from the hospital drug schedule.

Drugs used in Schizophrenia and other psychoses: (n=180) [Table/Fig-3].

Drugs used in the management of Mood disorders: (n=238) [Table/Fig-4].

Drugs used in the management of Anxiety disorders: (n=81) [Table/Fig-5].

Percent utilization of drugs in a sample of prescriptions of patients (n=180) suffering from schizophrenia and other psychoses attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai India, 1st Jan – 31st May, 2012

Percent utilization of drugs in a sample of prescriptions of patients (n=238) suffering from various mood disorders (depression and bipolar disorder) attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai India, 1st Jan-31st May, 2012

Percent utilization of drugs in a sample of prescriptions of patients (n=101) suffering from anxiety disorders attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai India, 1st Jan – 31st May, 2012

Pattern of Psychotropic Drug Use as per the ATC/DDD Classification: [Table/Fig-6].

ATC/DDD classification, PDD values and PDD/DDD ratio of psychotropic drugs prescribed in a sample of patients (n=600) attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai India, 1st Jan – 31st May, 2012

** For conversion of dose of lithium from mg to mmol the formula used was (16): mg/l × 0.144 = mmol/l × 6.94

Sr. No.DrugATC codeDDD* (mg)PDD (mg)PDD/DDD
1.TrifluoperazineN05AB0620130.65
2.ChlorpromazineN05AA01300770.26
3.HaloperidolN05AD0187.90.99
4.RisperidoneN05AX0854.50.9
5.OlanzapineN05AH03108.50.85
6.ClozapineN05AH023001930.64
7.ImipramineN06AA02100730.73
8.AmitriptylineN06AA0975781.04
9.SertralineN06AB0650801.6
10.FluoxetineN06AB0320251.25
11.EscitalopramN06AB101013.51.35
12.VenlafaxineN06AX16100780.78
13.DiazepamN05BA011060.6
14.ClonazepamN03AE0180.750.09
15.LorazepamN05BA062.520.8
16.CarbamazepineN03AF0110006730.67
17.ValproateN03AG01150010690.71
18.Lithium **N05AN0124 mmol12.50.5

DDDs mentioned in the table are for the oral route as obtained from the WHO ATC/DDD website 2012 [12].

Cost analysis of prescriptions:

The average cost per prescription was `178 or 3.2 USD, out of which `159 (89.3%) was on psychotropic drugs. The hospital bore 65.2% of the total cost. The drugs prescribed from outside the hospital were analyzed further in terms of their cost as shown in [Table/Fig-7].

Cost analyses of drugs prescribed from outside the hospital to a sample of patients attending the psychiatry outpatient department, Mumbai India, 1st Jan – 31st May, 2012

* The minimum and maximum cost was obtained from the Drug Index: April – June 2012 (13)

Sr. NoDrugsDose per Tablet (mg)Price per 10 tabs/caps in Rupees* in (₹)Average monthly Cost (₹)Cost Index (b/a)
Min (a)Max (b)MinMax
1.Risperidone + Trihexiphenidyl3 + 236432162581.2
2.Olanzapine1039681172041.74
3.Clozapine10045504260.552918.1611.20
4.Levosulpiride255785102615301.49
5.Pimozide41773512194.29
6.Aripiprazole158082272278.81.03
7.Fluoxetine202044751652.20
8.Escitalopram10207981319.953.95
9.Mirtazepine1558731742191.26
10.Bupropion1001301387808281.06
11.Venlafaxine75268081.12249.63.08
12.Desvenlafaxine5078802342401.03
13.Clonazepam0.5102545112.52.50
14.Lorazepam292727813.00
15.Divalproex25033492974411.48
16.Lamotrigine10066153144.54335.072.32
17.Quetiapine200781034686181.32

Discussion

Profile of study participants

More female patients visited the psychiatry OPD than men. Many studies have reported a similar finding [1315]. The reproductive age group (20–40 years) accounted for the majority of all the psychiatric disorders, as has been seen in many other studies [1619].

Prescription Pattern Analysis as per the WHO/INRUD Drug Use Indicators

The average number of psychotropic drugs per prescription was 1.79, which was lower than that found in similar studies, where it ranged from 2.3 to 3 drugs per prescription [20,16,21]. Since, no prescription had more than five drugs, we can say that polypharmacy was avoided. Polypharmacy can lead to poor compliance, drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, under-use of effective treatments and medication errors [22,23].

A large proportion of drugs (76.01%) were prescribed by generic names. The proprietary names were used for the drugs prescribed from outside the hospital. It is a known fact that substitution by generic drugs helps in decreasing the overall cost of therapy and is hence recommended. But there have been concerns in the case of narrow therapeutic index drugs (NTIDs) [24,25]. The USFDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) recommends that the decision should be based on ones professional judgment [26]. Generic substitution can be beneficial, provided, adequate quality control is assured.

In our study, the only injection prescribed was haloperidol decnoate – 50mg/ml – once a month, in a minority of schizophrenics (2.2%) through intramuscular route. Many Indian trials have evaluated the efficacy of depot anti–psychotics in schizophrenia and have found that depot anti–psychotics are useful in the management of schizophrenia in acute phases and also for maintenance treatment [27]. Concerns about the adverse effects and cost-effectiveness of parenteral routes of drug administration, are probably the reason for the low utilization of ’depot injection’ formulation in the psychiatry OPD.

The most commonly prescribed Fixed Drug Combinations (FDCs) was: trifluoperazine (typical anti–psychotic) plus trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride (central anticholinergic) because this combination was available in the hospital pharmacy free of cost. However, this represents an excess use of the anti–cholinergic drug trihexiphenydyl. Most of the antipsychotic drugs (typical) themselves have mild anticholinergic effects. Anti–cholinergic side effects can be debilitating like retention of urine, constipation, attack of angle closure glaucoma, dry mouth etc. Many observers have noted that the addition of anticholinergic medication can exacerbate existing Tardive Dyskinesia (TD), and that discontinuing anticholinergic drugs may improve the condition [28,29]. Based on a number of studies, the WHO has recommended that anti–cholinergics should not be used routinely for preventing extra–pyramidal side effects in individuals with psychotic disorders treated with anti–psychotics but used only for short term in selected cases.

Utilization of drugs from the essential medicines list (Indian & WHO) was very high. The primary purpose of NLEM is to promote rational use of medicines considering the three important aspects i.e., cost, safety and efficacy [30].

Observed Drug Use Pattern in Schizophrenia

The most commonly prescribed drugs were conventional/1st generation anti–psychotics. This is, as per the current recommendations and mainly because they were available in the hospital drug store. For some years, it was believed that the newer/2nd generation drugs were more effective, but that belief is now fading. In addition, the high cost of the atypical/2nd generation antipsychotics is a matter of concern. There have been some important studies which brought to light the finding that 1st generation drugs are as useful as the 2nd generation drugs, with the exception of clozapine which outperforms all [31,32]. In 2009 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) acknowledged the fact that the distinction between first- and second-generation antipsychotics appear to have limited clinical utility [33]. Also, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines - 2010, suggested that there it is no longer imperative to prescribe an “atypical” agent as first line treatment [34]. Clozapine may be offered only after primary failure of two antipsychotic drugs.

Diazepam was co–prescribed in about 17.8% of the patients. Benzodiazepines, usually perceived of as quite safe medications, have an addiction potential and can lead to falls, particularly in the elderly. With long term use the adverse effects such as memory impairment, depression, tolerance, and dependence outweighs the benefits. There have been reports of increased mortality among those patients prescribed these medications [35]. The guidelines recommend for their use of short term (maximum, four weeks) or intermittent courses in minimum effective doses [36].

Observed Drug Use Pattern in Mood Disorders

Among the anti–depressants, the Tricyclics (TCAs) were prescribed more than the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI). This is contrary to the current recommendations (APA and NICE) in the management of mood disorders [19,37]. The reason being that TCAs were available free of cost from the hospital drug store and the only SSRI on the hospital drug schedule was sertraline due to budgetary constraints. Currently, SSRIs are greatly preferred over the other classes of antidepressants. The adverse-effect profile of SSRIs is less prominent than that of some other agents, which promotes better compliance. The SSRIs are thought to be relatively unproblematic in patients with cardiac disease except citalopram in high doses [38,39].

Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOI) were not prescribed to anyone in our study. The reasons being risk of hypertensive crisis, interactions with other drugs and dietary restrictions for patients on MAOIs [40].

Among the drugs used in bipolar mood disorders, carbamazepine was most commonly prescribed followed by valproate, divalprovex and olanzapine. Lithium was used only in 1.3% patients of bipolar disorder. Studies have shown that patients with bipolar disorder have fewer episodes of mania and depression when treated with mood-stabilizing drugs. Kessing et al found that, in general, lithium was superior to valproate [41]. But because of the low therapeutic index for Lithium (Li+), periodic determination of serum concentrations is crucial [42]. The concern about its narrow therapeutic index and difficulty in obtaining drug levels of lithium, explains the low use of lithium in our center. Many drug utilization studies have also reported a similar finding [43,44]. In contrast to this, in a study conducted by Piparva et al., in Gujarat in 2011, it was found that lithium was used extensively, in about 73% of patients diagnosed with bipolar disorders [16].

According to the NICE guidelines – 2006 [45], for the management of bipolar disorder, lithium, olanzapine or valproate can be considered for long-term treatment. If the patient has frequent relapses, or symptoms that continued to cause functional impairment, switching to an alternative monotherapy or adding a second prophylactic agent (lithium or olanzapine or valproate) should be considered. If a trial of a combination of prophylactic agents proves ineffective, lamotrigine or carbamazepine can be tried.

Observed Drug Use Pattern in Anxiety Disorders

Diazepam was the most commonly prescribed drug for anxiety disorders, followed by Clonazepam, amitriptyline and fluoxetin. The 2011 NICE guidelines for the management of anxiety disorders state that SSRIs or Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) should be offered to the patient first. Benzodiazepines should be avoided and used only for short term in case of crisis [46,47].

Benzodiazepines can be reasonably used as an adjunct in the initial stage while SSRIs are titrated to an effective dose, and they can then be tapered over 4-12 weeks while the SSRI is continued [48].

Alprazolam was not prescribed to any patient suffering from anxiety disorder or otherwise and rightly so because of its higher dependence potential; Alprazolam has a short half-life, which makes it particularly prone to rebound anxiety and psychological dependence [48,49]. Clonazepam has become a favored replacement because it has a longer half-life and empirically elicits fewer withdrawal reactions upon discontinuation.

ATC/DDD Classification and DUS Metrics [Table/Fig-6]

When the PDD/DDD ratio is either less than or greater than one, it may indicate that there is either under or over utilization of drugs. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the PDD can vary according to patient and disease factors. The PDDs can also vary substantially between different countries, for example, PDDs are often lower in Asian than in Caucasian populations. In addition, the DDDs obtained from the WHO ATC/DDD website are applicable for management of conditions of moderate intensity and are based on international data. Thus, the WHO encourages countries to have their own DDD list based on indigenous data.

Cost Analysis

The cost borne by the hospital was almost twice the cost borne by the patient since a large percentage of drugs were prescribed from the hospital pharmacy and this helps improve compliance, especially in the low socioeconomic population [50].

There were no similar studies published, with whom we could compare our cost parameters. Cost of therapy is an important factor in various psychiatric disorders, because of the prolonged treatment. When we calculated the cost of drugs prescribed from outside the hospital, we found that the minimum cost of drug therapy per month was ` 27 for lorazepam and the maximum cost was ` 2918 for clozapine. The CI of desvenlafaxine was the lowest CI (1.03 times) and that of clozapine was the highest (11.2 times). The Cost Index (CI) gives an idea about the difference in cost of the same drug marketed by different companies. This again highlights the need to prescribe generic drugs and choose brands that offer good quality low cost drugs.

The Berkson’s bias [51] may play a role so that the observed prevalence and distribution of various psychiatric disorders may not be generalizable to the entire population. Being a retrospective DUS, we could not measure the consumed daily dose (actual use) and could not assess the comparative clinical effectiveness and adverse effect profile of various psychotropic drugs prescribed.

Conclusion

Schizophrenia was the most common diagnosis followed by bipolar disorder, depression and anxiety disorders.

In Schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions the most commonly prescribed single drug and fixed drug combination were, trifluoperizine and trifluoperizine + trihexiphenydyl, respectively and the least commonly prescribed drug was levosulpiride.

In Bipolar disorders, the most commonly prescribed drug was carbamazepine and the least commonly prescribed drug was lithium.

In Depression, the most commonly prescribed drug was amitriptyline and the least commonly prescribed drug was bupropion.

In Anxiety disorders, the most commonly prescribed drug was diazepam and the least commonly prescribed drug was clozapine.

A major part of the total cost per prescription was borne by the hospital.

Overall, the principles of rational prescribing were followed according to the various drug use indicators mentioned by WHO/INRUD. A few deviations were found from the guidelines (APA and NICE) due to socioeconomic reasons, budgetary constraints and technical difficulties.

We would like to make the following recommendations:

The Hospital Drug Schedule: Need to add more SSRIs.

The practice of using typical antipsychotics as first line should be continued.

Anticholinergics should be used only in selected cases of patients on anti psychotics.

The use of diazepam (volume and duration) should be curtailed.

References

[1]Strom BL, Pharmacoepidemiology 2005 4th edEnglandJohn Wiley and Sons  [Google Scholar]

[2]WHO International Working Group for Drug Statistics Methodology. Introduction to drug utilization research [Internet]. Geneva: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and Clinical Pharmacology; 2003 [cited 2012 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/drug_utilization_research.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[3]World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2001- Mental Health: New understanding, new hope [Internet]. Geneva; 2001 [cited 2012 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/  [Google Scholar]

[4]Math SB, Chandrashekar CR, Bhugra D, Psychiatric epidemiology in India The Indian journal of medical research [Internet] 2007 Sep [cited 2012 Nov 21] 126(3):183-92.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18037711  [Google Scholar]

[5]Murthy R, Mental Health Programme in the 11th five year plan The Indian Journal of Medical Research [Internet] 2007 [cited 2012 Nov 21];11(June):707–12. Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-5916;year=2007;volume=125;issue=6;spage=707;epage=711;aulast=Murthy;type=0  [Google Scholar]

[6]Sharma P, Das S, Deshpande S, An estimate of the monthly cost of two major mental disorders in an Indian metropolis Indian J Psychiatry 2006 48:143-8.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Brunton L, Lazo J, Parker K, Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics 2006 11th edMcGraw-Hill publication:401-500.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies BMJ (Clinical research ed.) [Internet] 2007 Oct 20 [cited 2012 Oct 29];335(7624):806–8. Available from: http://www.emgo.nl/kc/Analysis/statements/observationalstudies-lancet-2007.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[9]World Health Organization. How to investigate drug use in health facilities: selected health use indicators [Internet]. WHO/ DAP/ 93. Geneva; 1993 [cited 2012 Sep 5]. p. 1–87. Available from: apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js2289e/4.4.html  [Google Scholar]

[10] Drug Index: April - June 2012 Vol. 16Passi Publications  [Google Scholar]

[11]Dean A, Sullivan K, Soe M. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version 2.3.1 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2012 Oct 10]. Available from: www.OpenEpi.com  [Google Scholar]

[12]ATC/DDD Index 2012 [Internet]. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Norwegian Institute of Public Health. 2012 [cited 2012 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Patel V. Gender in Mental Health Research. Department of Gender, Women and Health Family and Community Health . [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2005 [cited 2012 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.who.int/gender/documents/MentalHealthlast2.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[14]Mohammed P, Mohamed E, Rajan S, Kumar K. Gender and mental health in Kerala [Internet]. Institute of Social Studies Trust. 2002 [cited 2012 Nov 2]. Available from: http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/handle/123456789/21040  [Google Scholar]

[15]Earls F. Sex differences in psychiatric disorders: origins and developmental influences. Psychiatric developments [Internet]. 1987 Jan [cited 2012 Nov 2];5(1):1–23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3601929  [Google Scholar]

[16]Allan GM, Lexchin J, Wiebe N, Physician awareness of drug cost: a systematic review. Hill S, editor PLoS medicine [Internet] 2007 Oct [cited 2013 May 31] 4(9)Public Library of Science:e283Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040283  [Google Scholar]

[16]Piparva KG, Parmar DM, Singh A P, Gajera MV, Trivedi HR, Drug utilization study of psychotropic drugs in outdoor patients in a teaching hospital Indian journal of psychological medicine [Internet] 2011 Jan [cited 2012 Oct 26] 33(1):54-8.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195156/  [Google Scholar]

[17]Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Anthony JC, Graaf DE R, Demyttenaere K, Gasquet I, Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative World psychiatry: official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) [Internet] 2007 Oct [cited 2012 Nov 2] 6(3):168-76.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2174588/  [Google Scholar]

[18]Friedli L. Mental health, resilience and inequalities [Internet]. World Health Organisation; 2009 [cited 2012 Nov 2]. Available from: http://wellbeingsoutheast.org.uk/uploads/FB602619-E582-778A-9979F5BB826FDE9B/MentalHealth, Resilience and Inequalities.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[19]Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder [Internet]. 3rd ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association (APA); 2010. p. 152. Available from: http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideChapToc_7.aspx  [Google Scholar]

[20]Lahon K, Shetty H, Paramel A, Sharma G, A Retrospective Drug Utilization Study of Antidepressants in the Psychiatric Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [Internet] 2011 [cited 2012 Nov 2] 5(5):1069-75.Available from: http://jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2011&month=October&volume=5&issue=5&page=1069&id=1521  [Google Scholar]

[21]Dutta SB, Dhasmana DC, Bhardwaj R, Psychotropic drug utilization pattern among patients with schizophrenia Indian journal of psychiatry [Internet] 2005 Oct [cited 2012 Nov 21] 47(4):243-4.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921146/  [Google Scholar]

[22]Nobili A, Garattini S, Mannucci P, Multiple diseases and polypharmacy in the elderly: challenges for the internist of the third millennium Journal of Comorbidity 2011 1:28-44.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Bushardt RL, Massey EB, Simpson TW, Ariail JC, Simpson KN, Polypharmacy: misleading, but manageable Clinical interventions in aging [Internet] 2008 Jan [cited 2012 Nov 2] 3(2):383-9.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2546482/  [Google Scholar]

[24]Benjamin F, Banahan Kolassa E, A Physician Survey on Generic Drugs and Substitution of Critical Dose Medications Arch Intern Med 1997 157:2080-8.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Shrank W, Liberman J, Fischer M, Girdish C, Brennan T, Choudhry N, Physician Perceptions About Generic Drugs The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2011 45:31-8.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Pope N, Generic Substitution of Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs US Pharm [Internet] 2009 34(6):12-9.Available from: http://www.uspharmacist.com/content/s/78/c/13854/  [Google Scholar]

[27]Avasthi A, Aggarwal M, Grover S, Khan MKR, Research on anti–psychotics in India Indian journal of psychiatry [Internet] 2010 Jan 52(1):317-40.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146231/  [Google Scholar]

[28]Kane J, Tardive Dyskinesia: Epidemiological and Clinical Presentation. In: Davis KL, Charney D, Coyle JT, Nemeroff C, editors Neuropsychopharmacology - 5th Generation of Progress [Internet] 2002 Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaLippincott, Williams, & WilkinsAvailable from: http://www.acnp.org/g4/gn401000143/CH140.html  [Google Scholar]

[29]Brasic JR. Tardive Dyskinesia [Internet]. Medscape Reference: Drugs, Diseases & Procedures. 2012 [cited 2012 Sep 3]. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1151826-overview#aw2aab6b4  [Google Scholar]

[30]National List of Essential Medicines of India. [Internet]. Ministry of Health and Family welfare. Government of India. 2011 [cited 2012 Sep 1]. Available from: http://cdsco.nic.in/National List of Essential Medicine- final copy.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[31]Lieberman J, Stroup T, The NIMH-CATIE Schizophrenia Study: What Did We Learn? Am J Psychiatry[Internet] 2011 [cited 2012 Nov 3] 168(8):770-5.Available from: http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=116011  [Google Scholar]

[32]Jones PB, Barnes TRE, Davies L, Dunn G, Lloyd H, Hayhurst KP, Randomized controlled trial of the effect on Quality of Life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Anti–psychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1) Archives of general psychiatry [Internet] 2006 Oct [cited 2012 Nov 3] 63(10):1079-87.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17015810  [Google Scholar]

[33]Dixon L, Perkins D, Calmes C, Guideline Watch: Practice Guideline for the treatment of patients with Schizophrenia [Internet] American Psychiatric Association 2009 [cited 2012 Oct 10] Available from: http://psychiatryonline.org/content.aspx?bookid=28&sectionid=1682213  [Google Scholar]

[34]National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. The Nice Guideline On Core Interventions In The Treatment And Management Of Schizophrenia In Adults In Primary And Secondary Care [Internet]. Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Research Unit.The British Psychological Society. Leicester; 2010 [cited 2012 Sep 3]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG82FullGuideline.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[35]Kripke DF, Langer RD, Kline LE, Hypnotics’ association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study BMJ open [Internet] 2012 Jan [cited 2012 Nov 3] 2(1):e000850Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293137/  [Google Scholar]

[36]Ashton H, Guidelines for the rational use of benzodiazepines. When and what to use Drugs [Internet] 1994 Jul [cited 2012 Nov 3] 48(1):25-40.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7525193  [Google Scholar]

[37]NICE. Depression in adults (update) (CG90) [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health; 2009 [cited 2012 Nov 3]. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG90  [Google Scholar]

[38]Potter W, Hollester L, Antidepression Agents. In: Katzung B, editor Basic and Clinical Pharmacology 2007 10th edBostonMcGraw-Hill:475-88.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Research Center for Drug Evaluation and Drug Safety and Availability - FDA Drug Safety Communication. Revised recommendations for Celexa (citalopram hydrobromide) related to a potential risk of abnormal heart rhythms with high doses [Internet]. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2011 [cited 2012 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm297391.html  [Google Scholar]

[40]Balon R, Mufti R, Arfken CL, A survey of prescribing practices for monoamine oxidase inhibitors Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) [Internet] 1999 Jul [cited 2012 Nov 3] 50(7):945-7.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10402617  [Google Scholar]

[41]Kessing LV, Hellmund G, Geddes JR, Goodwin GM, Andersen PK, Valproate v. lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder in clinical practice: observational nationwide register-based cohort study The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science [Internet] 2011 Jul [cited 2012 Nov 3] 199(1):57-63.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21593515  [Google Scholar]

[42]Brunton L, Parker K, Pharmacotherapy of Psychosis and Mania Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 2010 12th edUSAMcGraw-Hill  [Google Scholar]

[43]Ventimiglia J, Kalali AH, McIntyre R, Treatment of bipolar disorder Psychiatry (Edgmont) [Internet] 2009 Oct [cited 2012 Nov 3] 6(10):12-4.Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2790396&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract  [Google Scholar]

[44]Baldessarini RJ, Leahy L, Arcona S, Gause D, Zhang W, Hennen J, Patterns of psychotropic drug prescription for U.S. patients with diagnoses of bipolar disorders Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) [Internet] 2007 Jan 58(1):85-91.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17215417  [Google Scholar]

[45]NICE. Bipolar disorder (CG38) [Internet]. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health; 2006 [cited 2012 Nov 3]. p. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excella. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG38  [Google Scholar]

[46]Davis KL, Charney D, Coyle JT, Nemeroff C, Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fifth Generation of Progress [Internet] 2002 Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaLippincott, Williams, & WilkinsAvailable from: http://www.acnp.org/g4/gn401000143/CH140.html  [Google Scholar]

[47]NICE. Anxiety (CG22) [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health; 2011 [cited 2012 Nov 3]. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG113  [Google Scholar]

[48]Yates W. Anxiety Disorders Treatment & Management [Internet]. Medscape Reference: Drugs, Diseases & Procedures. 2012 [cited 2012 Sep 3]. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/286227-treatment#aw2aab6b6b4  [Google Scholar]

[49]Theodorou A, Johnson K, Slezak J, Szychowski J, Recent Trends in Utilization of Antianxiety Medication The American Journal of Pharmacy Benefits 2009 1(4)  [Google Scholar]

[50]Ramanathan A, Shantha GB, Balan V, Suitability of a socio-economic scale for hospital psychiatric population Indian journal of psychiatry [Internet] 1983 Jul [cited 2012 Nov 3] 25(3):203-5.Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3012318&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract  [Google Scholar]

[51]Roberts R, Spitzer W, Delmore T, Sackett D, An Empirical Demonstration of Berkson’s bias J Chron Dis [Internet] 1978 31:119-28.Available from: http://www.epidemiology.ch/history/PDF bg/Roberts RS, et al. 1978 an empirical demonstration of berkson’s bias.pdf  [Google Scholar]