JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6507.3756
Year : 2013 | Month : Dec | Volume : 7 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : 2777 - 2779

Utility of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions

Sahil I. Panjvani1, Biren J. Parikh2, Swati B. Parikh3, Bhawana R. Chaudhari4, Kazoomi K. Patel5, Garima S. Gupta6, Ashka H. Kodnani7, Garima M. Anandani8

1 3rd year Resident, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
4 3rd year Resident, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
5 3rd year Resident, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
6 2nd year Resident, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
7 2nd year Resident, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.
8 2nd year Resident, Department of Pathology, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, AMC MET, Gujarat, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Sahil I. Panjvani, D-2/12 Officer’s Quarters, Sangam Cross Roads, Near Vaibhav Society, Harni Road, Vadodara, Gujarat-390022, India.
Phone: +919624788798,
E-mail: dr.sahilpanjvani@gmail.com
Abstract

Background: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is a simple, minimally invasive, cost effective, outpatient based and a rapid diagnostic method for breast lesions. The aim of the present study was to correlate cytological findings with histopathological findings and to determine the accuracy of FNAC in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Material and Methods: A total of 222 breast aspirates were studied. Histo-cytopathological correlations were obtained in 91 cases. All the aspirates were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H andE) stain.

Results: Among 222 patients, 217 were females and 5 were males. Benign breast lesions were found in 144 cases (64.87%); among which fibroadenoma (30.18%) was the commonest lesion which was observed. Malignancy was observed in 69 cases (31.08%); among them, ductal carcinoma was the predominant lesion (29.28%) which was seen. Histopathological confirmations were obtained in 90 cases out of 91 cases in which histo-cytopathological corrections were possible. All 45 malignant aspirates were confirmed by histopathology. Benign reports were confirmed in 45 out of 46 cases by doing histological examinations; except one case which was diagnosed as malignant by studying its histopathology. Sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in breast lesions were reported to be 97.82% and 100% respectively, with 100% positive predictive value and 97.85% negative predictive value. Diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in the present study was found to be 98.90%.

Conclusion: It is important to remember that a negative FNAC of a breast lesion does not preclude the diagnosis of a carcinoma, particularly in presence of a clinical suspicion of malignancy and/or an abnormal mammogram.

Keywords

Introduction

Breast carcinomas are one of the leading causes of cancer in women. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) is one of the important components of ‘triple approach’, which has been widely accepted for the preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions [1]. It is a multi-disciplinary approach that includes analysis of clinical and radiological findings in conjunction with FNAC features, to diagnose the breast lesions and to determine the best management plan for the patient.

Most cases of breast lumps are benign [2], but sometimes, it is difficult to determine whether a suspicious lump is benign or malignant, simply by doing a clinical examination. In these circumstances, as a widely accepted and established outdoor patient procedure, FNAC plays an important role in determining the nature of the lump. FNAC can reduce the number of open breast biopsies [3].

Aims and Objectives

To correlate the cytological findings with histopathological examinations for breast lesions.

To determine the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Material and Methods

This Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology study was carried out at Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, on 222 patients with breast lesions; among which cyto-histopathological correlations were obtained in 91 cases.

FNAC was done by standard procedure. Palpable axillary lymph nodes were aspirated to exclude metastases. The slides were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) stain. Correlation with imaging studies, including mammography, was done. Statistical analysis of results was performed.

Results

The age of the patients in the present study varied from 16 to 80 years.

Out of 222 cases, female & male patients were 217 and 5 respectively [Table/Fig-1].

Age distribution of patients with breast lesions

This study documented the fact that benign breast lesions were the most common lesions in young females, among which the Fibroadenoma was the commonest one. The malignant lesions were common in fourth and fifth decades of life, among which infiltrating ductal carcinoma was the most common lesion.

As has been shown in [Table/Fig-2], one case which was cytologically diagnosed as a benign cystic lesion was diagnosed as a malignant phyllodes tumour by doing a histopathological examination (false negative result). Rest of all cases showed good correlations between FNAC and histopathology.

Cytological diagnosis of breast lesions by FNAC (n=222)

CategoryCytological DiagnosisNo. of CasesPercentage (%)
Inflammatory Lesions (50 Cases-22.52%)Acute mastitis/Abscess3415.32%
Granulomatous mastitis125.40%
Tuberculous Mastitis010.45%
Fat necrosis020.90%
Duct ectasia010.45%
Benign Breast Lesions (94 Cases-42.34%)Fibroadenoma6730.18%
Fibrocystic disease114.96%
Simple cyst052.25%
Epithelial hyperplasia010.45%
Galactocele052.25%
Lactational changes020.90%
Gynecomastia031.35%
Lesion Not Recognizesd As Benign or Malignant (06 Cases-2.70%)Phyllodes tumor041.80%
Papillary lesion020.90%
Atypical/Indeterminate-Probably Benign (01case- 0.45%)Epithelial hyperplasia with atypia010.45%
Suspicious of Malignancy (02cases-0.90%)Atypical cells suspicious of malignancy020.90%
Malignancy (69cases*- 31.08%)Ductal carcinoma6529.28%
Lobular carcinoma010.45%
Mucinous carcinoma010.45%
Stromal sarcoma020.45%
Unsatisfactory0000%
Total222100%

*Six cases in which lymphnodes were palpable revealed evidence of metastasis


The two cases which were categorized as “suspicious for malignancy” by cytology turned out to be malignant lesions on histopathology and they were diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ with foci of invasion and mucinous carcinoma.

The statistical analysis showed high sensitivity (97.82%) and specificity (100%) of FNAC in breast lesions, with Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) being 100% and 97.82% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was found to be 98.90% [Table/Fig-3,4].

Cyto-Histopathological Correlation (n=91)

FNAC ↓Histopathological Diangnosis →
Inflammatory LesionFibroadenomaFibrocystic diseasePhyllodes tumorLactational hyperplasiaBreast carcinoma
Inflammatory Lesion13 (14.29%)
Fibroadenoma23 (25.27%)
Fibrocystic disease05 (5.49%)
Benign cystic lesion01 (1.10%)
Phyllodes tumor03 (3.30%)
Lactational changes01 (1.10%)
Breast carcinoma*45 (49.45%)

*Two cases from the category of “suspicious lesion for malignancy” by FNAC are included in malignant lesion; as they were confirmed to be malignant by histopathological examination


Cyto-histopathological correlation & statistical evaluation of breast lesions

StudiesNo. of benign lesionHistological diagnosisNo. of malignant lesionHistological diagnosisNo. of suspicious casesHistological diagnosisSensitivitySpecificity
BenignMalignantMalignantBenignMalignantBenign
Tiwari M [7]1615 (93.75%)01 (6.25%)0505 (100%)00 (00%)83.3%100%
O’Neil S et al., [8]166153 (92.17%)13 (7.83%)401398 (99.25%)03 (0.75%)12584 (67.20%)41 (32.80%)97%78%
Zhang Qin et al., [9]215213 (99.07%)02 (0.93%)7373 (100%)00 (0%)2826 (92.86%)02 (7.14%)97.1%97.3%
A.Z. Mohammed et al., [l0]6158 (95.08%)03 (4.92%)2727 (100%)00 (00%)02 (2.15%)02 (100%)00 (00%)90.6%100%
Present study4645 (97.83%)01 (2.17%)4343 (100%)00 (00%)02 (2.20%)02 (100%)00 (00%)97.82%100%

Discussion

FNAC of breast lumps is an accepted and established method for determining the natures of breast lumps with a high degree of accuracy [4,5]. Application of Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) for the diagnosis of palpable breast masses was first introduced by Martin and Ellis in 1930 and since then, it has been established as an important tool in the evaluation of breast lesions.

Most of the patients with breast lumps are in a state of anxiety. So, in reducing anxiety and unnecessary surgical procedures as well as in minimization of delay in the diagnosis, FNAC proves very fruitful. FNA procedure is a safe method with only a few reported complications. It has been reported in the literature that the incidence of tumour transplantation along the needle track by FNA procedure is only about 0.0045%, and even much lower in superficially located tumours [6].

In our study, out of 46 cytologically diagnosed benign cases, 45 cases were confirmed histopathologically as benign breast lesions. However, one case which was misinterpreted as a benign cystic lesion by FNAC, was later on diagnosed as a malignant phyllodes tumour on doing a histopathological examination (False negative rate-2.17%). This might be due to inadequate sampling, because of the cystic nature of lesion. So, in case of cystic lesions, it is better to re-aspirate the lesion from the solid area after evacuation of cyst or image guided FNA should be performed to locate solid area. It is always necessary to correlate the FNAC findings with clinical diagnoses and mammograms and to go for core biopsies whenever they are needed, to avoid misdiagnoses. The false negative rate varies from 1-8% in different studies [710].

In the present study, all the 43 cytologically diagnosed malignant cases were confirmed as malignant on subsequent histopathological examinations. So, in our study, a 100% cyto-histopathological correlation was observed for malignant lesions. Zhang Qin et al., [9], AZ Mohammed et al., [10], Tiwari M [7] had also observed the same results in their studies.

In the present study, 2 cases which were cytologically diagnosed as lesions “suspicious for malignancy” were confirmed as malignant lesions on doing histopathological studies. Other studies also noted an increase in rate of malignancy on histopathology in lesions which were previously diagnosed under the category of “suspicious lesions for malignancy”.

A difference was noted in the incidences of benign and malignant breast lesions amongst various studies, which may be explained on the basis of variables like the duration of study period, number of cases studied, age group of patients, etc.

In this study, sensitivity and specificity of breast FNAC were 97.82% and 100% respectively, which were quite comparable with the findings of other studies. Diagnostic accuracy in our study was reported to be 98.90%. Accuracy rates of 84-99.5% have been reported in various series [11].

Conclusion

Fine needle aspiration cytology is a simple, cost- effective, highly accurate, quick and relatively less painful procedure which can be used for the diagnosis of breast lumps. Some false negative results are inevitable. Sampling errors and interpretation errors are responsible for false negative results.

Therefore, correlation between clinical examination and histopathology holds high significance in diagnosis of breast cancer.

*Six cases in which lymphnodes were palpable revealed evidence of metastasis*Two cases from the category of “suspicious lesion for malignancy” by FNAC are included in malignant lesion; as they were confirmed to be malignant by histopathological examination

References

[1]Kocjan G, Bourgain C, Fassina A, The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis & clinical management: a survey of current practice Cytopathology 2008 19:271-78.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Cochrane RA, Singhal H, Monypenny IJ, Sebster DJ, Lyons K, Mansel RE, Evaluation of general practitioner referrals to a specialist breast clinic according to the UK national guidelines Euro J Surg Oncol 1997 23(3):198-201.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Hindle WH, Payne PA, Pan EY, The use of fine needle aspiration in the evaluation of persistent palpable dominant breast masses Am J Obstetrics Gynaecol 1993 168(6 Part 1):1814-18.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Purasiri P, Abdalla M, Heys SD, Ah-See AK, McKean ME, Gilbert FJ, A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic J R Coll Surg Edinb 1996 41:30-34.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Kaufman Z, Shpitz B, Shapiro M, Rona R, Lew S, Dinbar A, Triple approach in diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography and fine-needle aspiration J Surg Oncol 1994 56:254-57.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Haddad FS, Re: Risk factors for perineal seeding of prostate cancer after needle biopsy J Urol 1990 143:587-88.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Tiwari M, Role of FNAC in diagnosis of breast lumps Kathmandu University Medical Journal 2007 5:215-17.  [Google Scholar]

[8]O’Neil S, Castelli M, Gattuso P, Kluskens L, Madsen K, Aranha G, Fine-needle aspiration of 697 palpable breast lesions with histopathologic correlation Surgery 1997 122(4):824-28.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Zhang Qin, Nie Shigui, Chen Yuhua, Zhou Limei, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Breast Lesions: Analysis of 323 Cases The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004 3(3):172-74.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Mohammad AZ, Edino ST, Ochicha O, Alhassan SU, Value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of palpable breast lumps in rei-poor countries: a Nigerian experience Annals of African Medicine 2005 4(1):19-22.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Wilkison EJ, Schuetteke CM, Ferrier CM, Franzini DA, Fine needle aspiration of breast masses. An analysis of 276 aspirates Acta Cytol 1989 33:613-19.  [Google Scholar]