JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5462.2962
Year : 2013 | Month : May | Volume : 7 | Issue : 5 Full Version Page : 873 - 875

Target Scan-The Experience at Saveetha Medical College

Navamani Hephzibah Kirubamani1, M.R Meenatshi2

1 Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Saveetha UniversitySaveetha Nagar, Thandalam Post, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Pin Code 602 105, District Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Sonologist, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Saveetha University, Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam Post, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Pin Code 602 105, District Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRES, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Navamani Hephzibah Kirubamani, Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 58/2 Paripoorna Vinayakar Koil Street, Mylapore, Chennai- 600004, India.
Phone: 9841043753
E-mail: hepsi1002@yahoo.co.in,hepsi.hn@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction: The identification of foetal anomalies in utero is important. The prenatal detection of such abnormalities, often aids in planning the appropriate obstetrical management.

Objectives: To evaluate the antenatal prevalence of the major congenital anomalies and the malformation patterns which were seen in low risk patients of our hospital population.

Study Design: This was a cross-divtional and an observational study.

Settings: This study was done in the Radiology and Obstetrics Department of Saveetha Medical College, India.

Duration: It extended from June 2012 to Aug 2012.

Sample size: It was done on 250 patients.

Results: The incidence of foetal anomalies in our study was 2.97%. The mean maternal/mean gestational age at diagnosis was 24.5years /20 weeks. Among the 250 cases, five cases had lethal anomalies and two cases had non lethal anomalies.

The lethal anomalies were cystic hygroma, body stalk anomaly, multicystic kidney, non immune hydrops and a Dandy Walker variant. All of the patients were primi gravida, without any risk factors. Two non lethal anomalies which were found were a duplication cyst in the foetal abdomen and a single umbilical artery. Foetal kartotyping and foetal autopsies were done in two cases. The parents of the offsprings with the lethal anomalies were counseled and they decided to go for termination of the pregnancies. It was offered to them. For the non- lethal cases, complete postnatal work ups were done by the paediatrician.

Conclusion: The sonographic demonstration of a lethal foetal anomalies is mandatory, which may dramatically alter the obstetrical management and it also aids in the parental preparation.

Future Scope: In our study, all the non compatible with life anomalies were seen in the young primi without any risk factors and hence, the environmental cause has to be studied.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

The major structural abnormalities occur in 2–3% of the foetuses, which accounts for 20–30% of the perinatal mortality which is seen in the developed world. A vast majority occur in low-risk women, they are sporadic and therefore, they cannot be anticipated. With the rapid advances in the molecular diagnostic techniques and the recent developments in the in-utero therapy, an early diagnosis of the foetal problems is imperative. The identification of foetal anomalies in utero is important. The prenatal detection of these abnormalities often aids in planning the appropriate obstetrical management and it optimizes the care of the foetuses and the new borns.

Objectives

To evaluate the antenatal prevalence of the major congenital anomalies in our hospital population and to study the malformation patterns.

Study Design

This was a cross-sectional and an observational study.

Duration

It extended from June 2012 To Aug 2012.

Sample size

It was done on 250 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the pregnant women who attended the Antenatal Clinic of the Obstetrics Department of Saveetha Medical College from June 2012 to August 2012 were examined by transabdominal sonography between 18 -20 weeks by a sonologist of the Radiology Department of Saveetha Medical College. A detailed anatomical survey was done. The inclusion criteria were all the patients without any risk.

The exclusion criterion was pregnancy which was associated with risk factors. The details regarding the parity, age distribution and the gestational age during which the USG was done, were analyzed. When lethal anomalies were detected, after getting the consents of the patients, autopsies were done and the findings were correlated. The foetal chromosome analyses were done in two cases. For the parents with foetal anomalies, counselling was given in a supportive environment and the appropriate management was offered.

RESULTS

In our study, among the 250 cases, 7 anomalies were detected, which gave an incidence 2.97%.

[Table/Fig-1] shows the analysis of the age distribution, which showed that the mean age in our study was 24 years.

Analysis of Age distribution

AgeNumbersPercentage
15-20228.8
21-2511244.8
26-309437.6
31- 35187.2
36-4041.6
40 and aboveNilNil

[Table/Fig-2] shows the distribution of the parity. A majority of the patients were gravida two 53.2%.

Distribution of Parity

ParityNumbersPercentage
Primi10441.6
Gravida-213353.2
Gravida-3124.8
Gravida-4 and above10.4

[Table/Fig-3] shows the gestational age during which the target USG was done and it reveals that in a majority of the cases (48.8%), it was done within 20 weeks of gestation.

Shows Gestational age during which target USG done

Gestational AgeNumbersPercentage
18 weeks 6 days187.2
19 weeks 6 days9839.2
20 weeks 6 days12248.8
21 weeks 6 days124.8

[Table/Fig-4] shows that a variety of anomalies were detected. Five turned out to be lethal, namely, cystic hygroma [Table/Fig-4], body stalk anomaly [Table/Fig-5], non immune foetal hydrops [Table/Fig-6] lost to follow up, the Dandy Walker syndrome [Table/Fig-7] and multicystic dysplastic kidneys [Table/Fig-8]. Two were non lethal, namely, isolated single umbilical arteries and duplication cyst [Table/Fig-9].

Cystic hygroma

Body stalk anomaly

Non immune fetal Hydrops

Dandy walker syndrome

Multicystic dysplastic kidney

Isolated single umbilical Artery

At 32 weeks, the patient with single umbilical artery developed oligohydramnios and abnormal Doppler patterns. An elective LSCS was done and baby was normal duplication cyst [Table/Fig-10], which is a congenital malformation of the alimentary tract. In our case, the cyst was near [1]. the ileum and at term, the baby was delivered by LSCs for obstetric indication and it was normal.

Duplication cyst

Post natally, the paediatric surgeon’s opinion was obtained and he advised a follow up. For all the cases with anomalies, counselling was given and the parents of the babies with lethal anomalies opted for termination of their pregnancies. Autopsies were carried out in two cases and both showed a very good sonopatholgy correlation. In two cases, the foetal blood was sent for karyotyping, which showed normal karyotypes. The karyotyping results helped us in counselling the parents for their future pregnancies. It was interesting to note that all the lethal anomalies were found in women with no risk and that all of them were primi gravida.

DISCUSSION

Target Scan is an integral part of the antenatal care [2] and it is universally accepted, as was quoted by Geirsson RT and by using which, most of the lethal foetuses can be detected.

In our study, when foetal anomalies were identified in the low risk group, they were given full information, in privacy and the necessary support was provided, as was also reported [3] by Gagnon et al., In our study, foetal autopsies and foetal karyotyping were done when the parents gave their consents and it was easy for us to counsel them regarding the diagnosis and the recurrent risk [1], as was also reported by Desilets V. et al., When the parents did not give their consent to do autopsies of their foetuses, they were explained about the external features [1]. When non lethal anomalies were detected, the parents were well prepared and the handling of the newborns was done appropriately by the paediatricians [3]. In our study, after the lethal anomalies were detected, the accurate information and counselling were given, which helped the couples and their families to make informed decisions. Our study is to assess value of ultrasonography in detecting structural anomalies of the fetus in low risk population which was similar to study conducted by Taipale P et al., [4] Since study was small it did not had impact on Perinatal outcome and it was similar to Ewigman BG et al., [5].

CONCLUSIONS

Target scan has become an indispensable tool because a prenatal detection has several practical benefits, which include a parental preparation, delivery planning and an optimal paediatric care. A prenatal detection can dramatically alter the obstetrical management.

Future Scope: In our study, all non compatible with life anomalies were seen in the young primi without any risk factors.

Hence, the environmental cause has to be studied.

References

[1]Désilets V, Oligny LL, Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecology Canada; Family Physicians Advisory Committee; Medico–Legal Committee of the SOGC. Fetal and Perinatal autopsy in prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormalities with normal karyotype J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011 Oct 33(10):1047-57.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Geirsson RT, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Landspitali University Hospital, Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland. reynirg@landspitali. is.ultrasound screening at 18-20 weeks Laeknabladid 2001 87(5):403-07.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Gagnon A, Wilson RD, Allen VM, Audibert F, Blight C, Brock JA, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies J. Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009 Sep 31(9):875-81.:882-89.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Taipale P, Ammala M, Salonen R, Hiilesmaa V, Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 2003 101:273-78.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasound screening in a low risk population: Impact on perinatal outcome N Engl J Med 1993 329:821  [Google Scholar]