JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5355.2807
Year : 2013 | Month : Mar | Volume : 7 | Issue : 3 Full Version Page : 503 - 506

A Clinico-Pathological Study on Benign Breast Diseases

Mima B. Maychet Sangma1, Kishori Panda2, Simon Dasiah3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery,
2 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology,
3 Professor & Head, Department of General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Pondicherry-605009, India.


NAME, ADRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Mima Maychet B. Sangma, Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Vazhudavur Road, P.O. Kathirkamam, Pondicherry-605009, India.
Phone: +91-4132278873, +91-9943256226
E-mail: mimamaychet@gmail.com
Abstract

Background: To study the patterns of clinically benign breast disease in females and to co-relate them with the pathological findings.

Methods: One hundred females who attended the Surgery Outpatients Department in Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, with various forms of benign breast diseases during the period from October 2011 to September 2012, were studied. Early diagnoses by doing a triple assessment like a clinical examination, FNAC or a core needle biopsy and imaging methods like ultrasonography or mammography, were made within 72 hrs from the first consultation. The clinical diagnoses were compared with the cytological or histological findings wherever possible and their accuracies were evaluated.

Results: Out of the 100 female patients who were studied, 87 patients who presented with breast lumps and fibroadenoma, accounted for 48% of the cases, which was the highest number of patients. Fibrocystic changes and breast abscesses came next with 18% and 12% cases respectively. We detected 3 cases of proliferative disease with atypia and one case with florid hyperplasia, which had high and low risk factors respectively, for developing invasive carcinoma. The oldest lady of the group who was clinically diagnosed to have benign disease, was detected to have invasive ductal carcinoma. They were treated in our hospital and were advised follow up.

Conclusion: Benign breast diseases are common in female patients and fibroadenoma is the commonest of them all. Triple assessment provided a quick diagnosis and it alleviated unnecessary anxiety from the patients about breast cancer. The clinical diagnosis of a breast lump, as confirmed by cytology and histology, was accurate in 91.95 % of the cases.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Benign Breast Diseases (BBDs) is a group of breast diseases which is not cancer. It is the most common cause of breast problems in females and it is more frequent than the malignant ones [16]. In fact, it is at least 10 times more common than breast cancer in the west [7]. Upto 30% of the women who suffer from BBDs will require treatment at some time in their lives [8]. A triple assessment which is done by a clinical examination imaging like ultrasonography (USG) or mammography and a pathological examination – FNAC or core needle biopsy, during the initial consultation, allows a majority of the patients with discrete BBDs to be given immediate reassurance. Since a majority of the benign lesions are not associated with an increased risk for subsequent breast cancer, unnecessary surgical procedures can be avoided. Making an early diagnosis and planning the treatment within 72 hours of the first consultation, helps in alleviating unnecessary anxiety about breast cancer and those BBDs patients with an increased risk of malignancy like atypical hyperplasia, are given a prompt treatment, a proper follow-up and awareness regarding the risk of breast cancer.

The popular classification of BBDs according to the Aberration of the Normal Development and Involution (ANDI) causes confusion due to a lack of clarity in distinguishing between the normal physiological changes and the pathologic ones. One of the more satisfying classifications would be the one which was devised by Love S et al., [9], the so -called Nashville classification. According to this, BBDs is classified by 2 systems. Pathologically, BBDs is divided into (a) non-proliferative lesions, (b) proliferative lesions Sectionwithout atypia and(c) atypical proliferative lesions. Clinically, BBDs is classified as (a) physiologic swelling and tenderness, (b) nodularity, (c) breast pain, (d) palpable lumps, (e) nipple discharge and (f) infections or inflammation. In this study, we profiled the incidence of BBDs, the relative frequencies of the different types of BBDs and their clinical features. Secondly, we attempted at correlating the clinical and pathological findings wherever possible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive study was conducted in the Out Patients Department of General Surgery in Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India from October 2011 to September 2012. The first 100 (one hundred) women who were treated for BBDs were included in this study. The patients were required to give written informed consents prior to their enrolment in the study and a clearance was taken as per the institute’s ethical committee guidelines.

Inclusion criteria

Female patients with any benign disorder/disease of the breast-for example, a breast lump, breast pain or a nipple discharge, were included.

Exclusion criteria

Women with an obvious malignant disease or those who had been treated for malignancy earlier, were excluded in this study. However, any patient who was diagnosed with carcinoma or proliferative lesions after she was clinically diagnosed as benign earlier, was treated and included in this study.

A detailed history and a thorough physical examination were the basis of the study. After making an appropriate clinical diagnosis, one or more of the special investigations – FNAC, mammography, ultrasound or a core-needle biopsy were carried out for the confirmation of the diagnosis.

The FNAC smears were reported by using standardized diagnostic criteria by the same pathologist and they were categorized into non proliferative/proliferative without atypia/atypical proliferative lesion/frank carcinoma. A routine histopathological examination was done for the core biopsy and the excision biopsy samples and a cytohisto-correlation was also done. The clinical diagnosis, particularly in the case of the benign breast lumps, was compared with the cytological or the histological findings and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 100 female patients who attended in the Surgery Out-patients Department for breast diseases, were studied in the Department of General Surgery. The patients were broadly divided into 3 groups, depending on their symptoms or presentations, such as a breast lump, breast pain and a nipple discharge.

The commonest presentation was breast lumps which comprised 87 (87%) cases, out of which 27 (27%) had associated complaints like breast pain and nipple discharge. More than one symptom was present for the same patient.

Among 33 (33%) patients with breast pain, 9 (9%) patients complained of breast pain (mastalgia) only, who were treated by using a conservative approach or reassurance. The rest had associated complaints like breast lumps and nipple discharges. Half of these had pain in both the breasts. The pain was cyclical in 20 patients and it was non-cyclical in 13 cases.

Among the 8 cases with nipple discharges, only one case presented with nipple discharge only, without any associated lump or pain. The nipple discharge was blood in 3 cases and it was serosanguinous fluid in 4 cases, and only one case had a yellow discharge. The cause for 2 cases was intraductal papilloma and for the rest, it was mammary duct ectasia.

The different types of presentations and their incidences are shown in [Table/Fig-1].

Different types of presentation and their incidence

PresentationNo. of patientsPercentage
1. Breast lump only6363%
2. Breast lump + Pain2020%
3. Breast lump + Nipples discharge33%
4. Breast lump + Pain + Nipple discharge44%
5. Breast Pain only99%
6. Nipple discharge only11%
Total100100%

The age distribution of the patients is given in [Table/Fig-2]. The ages of the patients with BBDs ranged from 8 years to 68 years. The mean age at presentation was 28.4 years. 45 patients were in the age group of 21-30 years. The youngest was a 6 years old girl 504who presented with a small lump on the right side, with mastitis. The oldest was a 68 years old lady who had a lump on the right side of the breast, with invasive ductal breast cancer. Among the 87 patients with breast lumps, 39 patients are in the age group of 21-30 years. The lump was 3cm across in 40 cases, which happened to be the commonest size in the series.

Age-wise distribution of benign breast disease

There were 6 giant fibroadenomas, the largest being of the size, 7x9cm. There are 10 cases with multiple fibroadenomas. One young girl who was 22 years of age, presented with 8 fibroadenomas, five on the right side of the breast and three on the left side, which had average sizes of 3-2cms. The largest lump which was reported was a phylloid tumour of size 15x17cm, which was on the right side. Three of the non-tender breast lumps which were clinically reported as fibroadenomas, were diagnosed by HPE as proliferative disease with atypia in 2 cases and one was reported as florid hyperplasia. Two of the breast lumps which were clinically diagnosed as fibrocystic changes, were reported by a histopathological examination (HPE) as a proliferative lesion with atypia in one case and as invasive ductal carcinoma in the other case of the biopsy sample, for whom treatment was given in our hospital. Among the 100 patients, the right breast affected is 48 (48%) patients, while the left breast was affected in 40 (40%) patients. In 12 (12%) cases, both the breasts were affected, as shown in [Table/Fig-3].

Side-wise distribution of benign breast disease

Side involvedNo. of casesPercentage
Right breast4848%
Left breast4040%
Both breast1212%
Total100100%

The incidences of different types of benign breast diseases are given in [Table/Fig-4].

Incidence of different types of benign breast disease

DiagnosisNo. of BBDPercentage
Fibroadenoma4848%
Fibrocystic changes1818%
Breast abscess1212%
Mastalgia1010%
Nipple discharge Intraductal papilloma – 2 Mammary duct ectasia – 688%
Accessory breast55%
Mastitis55%
Galactocele44%
Proliferative disease with atypia33%
Proliferative disease with florid hyperplasia11%
Invasive ductal carcinoma11%

Clinical and histocytological correlations

The diagnoses of the lumps were confirmed either cytologically or histologically, or in both ways. FNAC was done in 87cases. FNAC and biopsy were done in 65 cases. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of fibroadenoma was 92% (48 out of 52 cases). Among the 65 cases of excised biopsies, 3 cases were reported as proliferative lesions with atypia. Two FNAC cases of proliferative lesions with atypia were missed cytologically and they were subsequently diagnosed by HPE. The clinical diagnoses of the fibrocystic changes were made in 22 cases and 18 of them were correct. One of them was reported by HPE as a proliferative lesion with atypia and the oldest lady of this group was reported as invasive ductal carcinoma, for whom treatment was given in our hospital and they were advised follow up. So, the diagnosis was wrong in these two cases of fibrocystic changes. Three of the non-tender breast lumps which were clinically reported as fibroadenomas, were diagnosed by HPE as proliferative disease with atypia in 2 cases and one was diagnosed as florid hyperplasia. On the whole, the clinical diagnosis was correct in 80 out of the 87 patients with benign breast lumps (91.95% accuracy).

DISCUSSION

Benign breast diseases includes a heterogeneous group of conditions which range from normal, to aberrations in the physiology, to frank disease. The patients of BBDs generally present with one or more of these complaints – breast lump, breast pain or nipple discharge. It has been recommended that all the patients with discrete breast lumps should undergo a triple assessment to make an early diagnosis. By this approach, we provided the diagnoses of most of the benign breast conditions within 72 hours of the initial consultation. In the study of Foncroft LM et al., [10], they found that 87.4% of the women who attended the Wesley Breast Clinic had presented with breast lumps, while in the series of Ratana Chaikanont T [11], a breast lump was the presenting symptom in 72.35% of the 331 benign breast patients. The corresponding figure for our study was 87%. Fibroadenomas accounted for 52.74% of the benign breast lumps in our study. Our finding was in agreement with most of the available literature on benign breast lumps, where the frequency of fibroadenoma ranged from 46.6%-55.6% [1215]. The peak incidence of fibroadenoma ranged from the 2nd to the 3rd decade of life, which was consistent with the findings of other studies. FNAC was the quickest and the most reliable method which helped in making the diagnoses of the breast lumps.

The fibrocystic changes were the next common condition in our study and a majority of the patients belonged to the 3rd and 4th decades. The incidence varies geographically. Many authors like Adesunkanmi AR and Agbakwuru EA and Ihekwaba FN found that the incidence of the fibrocystic changes ranged from 29.5-42.2% for the benign breast lumps [1213]. We had a slightly smaller figure, with 19.7%.

The mean age at presentation was 28.4 years. In the age group of 21-30 years, there were 45 patients. This was almost similar to the observation which was made by Navneet Kaur et al.,[16].

The incidence of breast pain in our series was 33%, which was nearly equal to the breast pain series, which ranged from 12.8%- 30.3% [1117]. Leis HP et al., [18] reported that the incidence of breast discharge was only 9% of all the breast complaints in his study, which was almost equal to the 8% incidence which was found in our study.

Out of the 8 cases of nipple discharge, 2 were intraductal papilloma with bloody nipple discharges and 6 were mammary duct ectasia. The treatment of the nipple discharge must be done first, to exclude carcinoma on occult blood test and cytology. A simple reassurance may then be sufficient, but if the discharge is proving to be intolerable, an operation must be done to remove the affected duct or ducts [8]. A total excision of 2 cases of intraductal papilloma was done. Mammary duct ectasia generally does not require surgery and it should be managed conservatively [19]. We treated 6 cases of mammary duct ectasia by using a conservative management.

The incidence of benign breast diseases begins to rise in the 2nd decade and it peaks in the 4th or 5th decades as compared to the malignant lesions, for which the incidence continues to rise after menopause [2022]. In the study of Dupont and Page [23], atypical hyperplasia was identified in only 4% of the biopsy samples. In our study, 3 patients with breast lumps had proliferative lesion with atypia on the biopsy samples, which was 4.6% of the total 65 biopsy samples which were taken. The findings of our study were almost the same as those of their studies. However, our samples were smaller in number than theirs.

We advised follow up every 3 months for both the low and high risk categories, since some studies have shown the progression of the low risk category to carcinoma [24]. The risk factors for carcinoma of the breast were explained to the patients, which is a two-fold increased risk for developing Ca breast in florid hyperplasia and a four-fold increase risk in proliferative lesions with atypia. The only case with invasive breast cancer was treated in our hospital and she was advised follow up every 3 months. Currently, there is a controversy over the classification of the proliferative lesions and the microscopic risk assessment, which have less relevance in the clinical practice. So, there is a need for non morphologic markers (genetic/molecular) so that chemoprevention agents can be used as an alternative to surgery and so that the histo-pathological criteria can be refined for the risk assessment [25].

CONCLUSIONS

Benign breast diseases is a common problem in women. A lump in the breast is the commonest presentation. Breast pain and nipple discharge are the other symptoms. Most of the patients have more than one symptom. The commonest age group which is affected is the 21-30 years age group. Among the breast lumps, fibroadenoma is the commonest, followed by fibrocystic changes and breast abscesses. The other lumps are relatively uncommon. Breast pain may occur alone or in association with a lump or a nipple discharge. The incidence of cyclical pain is 20% and that of non-cyclical pain is 13%. The nipple discharge, particularly if it is serous or greenish, is harmless. The clinical diagnoses of the benign breast lumps were accurate in 91.95 % cases.

The risk factors for developing invasive carcinoma in the patients with proliferative lesions were also identified and the patients were advised follow-up. Since there is no consensus on the morphologic risk markers, in future, molecular genetic markers may help in the risk stratification, which will help in a better clinical management.

References

[1]Khemka A, Chakravarti N, Shah S, Patel V, Palpable breast lumps: Fine needle aspiration cytology versus histopathology, a correlation of diagnostic accuracy Internet J Surgery 2009 18:1  [Google Scholar]

[2]Cole P, Mark Elwood J, Kaplan SD, Incidence rates and risk factors of benign breast neoplasms Am J Epidemol 1978 108:112-20.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Hutchinson WB, Thomas DB, Hamlin WB, Risk of breast cancer in women with benign breast lesion J Natl Cancer Inst 1980 65:13-20.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Kelsey JL, Gammon MD, Epidemiology of breast cancer Epidemiol Rev 1990 12:228-40.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Sarnelli R, Squartini F, Fibrocystic condition and “at risk” lesions in asymptomatic breasts, a morphologic study of post-menopausal women Clin Exp. Obstet Gynecol 1991 18:271-79.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Cook MG, Rohan TE, The patho-epidemiology of benign proliferative epithelial disorder of the female breast J Pathol 1985 146:1-15.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Mansel RE, Benign breast disease Practitioner 1982 232:830-37.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Sainsbury RC, Breast In: Norman WS, Bulstrode CJK, P.Ronan O’Connel editors Bailey and Love’s Short Practice of Surgery 2008 25thLondonEdward Arnold Ltd.:827-35.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Love SM, Gelman RS, Silen W, Fibrocystic disease of the breast – a non disease? N Eng J Med 1982 309:1010-14.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Foncroft LM, Evans EB, Hirst C, Hicks BJ, Presentation and diagnosis of adolescent breast disease Breast 2001 10(5):399-404.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Ratanachaikamont T, Clinical breast examination, palpable breast lesion J Med Assoc Thai 2005 88(4):505-07.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Adesunkami AR, Agbakwuru EA, Benign breast disease at Wesley Guild Hospital, Ilesha, Nigeria West Afr J Med 2001 20(2):146-51.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Ihekwaba FN, Benign breast disease in Nigerian women: a study of 657 patients J R Col Surg Edin 1994 39(5):280-03.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Florica JV, Fibrocystic changes O and G Clin N am 1994 21(3):445-59.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Greenberg R, Skornick Y, Kaplan O, Management of breast fibroadenomas J Gen Inter Med 1998 13:640-05.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Kaur Navneet, Agarwal Nitin, Parwar Pankaj, Clinicopathologic profile of benign breast conditions in Indian women. Prospective study based on aberrations of normal development and involution classification World J Surgery 2012 36:2252-58.  [Google Scholar]

[17]El-Wakeel HC, Systematic reviews of fibroadenomas as a risk factor on breast cancer Breast 2003 12:302-07.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Leis HP Jr, Commarata A, Laraja RD. Nipple discharge significant and treatment Breast 1985 11:6  [Google Scholar]

[19]Sakorafas GH, Nipple discharge: Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches Cancer Treat Rev 2001 27:275-82.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Londen SJ, Conmolly JL, Schmitt SJ, A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer JAMA 1992 267:941-44.  [Google Scholar]

[21]McDivitt RW, Stevens JA, Lee NC, Histologic types of benign breast disease and the risk for breast cancer Cancer 1992 69:1408-14.  [Google Scholar]

[22]LaVecchia C, Parazzini F, Francechi S, Risk factors for benign breast disease and their relation with breast cancer risk. Pooled information from epidemiologic studies Tumori 1985 71:167-78.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Dupont WD, Page DL, Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative disease N Engl J Med 1985 312:146-51.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Wang Jiping, Joseph PC, Tan-Chiu Elizabeth, Wickerham Lawrence, Paik Soonmyung, Wolmark Norman, Low category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer Journal of the national cancer institute 2004 96:8  [Google Scholar]

[25]Rosen Paul Peter, Rosen’s Breast Pathology 2009 103rdLippincott Williams and Wilkinson Ltd.:264-84.  [Google Scholar]