JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5267.2738
Year : 2013 | Month : Feb | Volume : 07 | Issue : 2 Full Version Page : 247 - 249

Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter Jejuni Isolated from Paediatric Diarrhea Cases in A Tertiary Care Hospital of New Delhi, India

Roumi Ghosh1, Beena Uppal2, Prabhav Aggarwal3, Anita Chakravarti4, Arun Kumar Jha5

1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Microbiology,
2 Director Professor, Department of Microbiology,
3 Post Graduate Student, Department of Microbiology,
4 Director Professor, Department of Microbiology,
5 Senior Resident, Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi-110002, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Roumi Ghosh, Post Graduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Room No.66, New Girls Hostel, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi-110002, India.
Phone: +91-9013756559
E-mail: roumighosh@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction: The resistance to the clinically important antimicrobial agents, particularly the fluoroquinolones and the macrolides, is increasing among the Campylobacter isolates. Only limited data is available regarding the changing antimicrobial resistance pattern in the Indian scenario.

Methodology: Three hundred fifty cases (ages ≤12years) of acute diarrhoea, who were admitted to a tertiary-care hospital, were investigated for Campylobacter spp.

The antimicrobial susceptibilities of all the C. jejuni isolates were assessed by the disk diffusion method according to the CLSI guidelines.

Results: A total of 36 isolates of C. jejuni were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibilities. A high degree of resistance to the fluoroquinolones (100% to Nalidixic acid and 86.66% to Ciprofloxacin) was detected in the Campylobacter isolates. The frequency of resistance against Tetracycline was 33.33% and that against Erythromycin was 22.2%. Fifteen (41.66%) isolates were multiresistant, being resistant to 3 or more antimicrobial agents.

Conclusions: An increased resistance to the quinolones and the macrolides and multidrug resistance warrant a reconsideration of their use as the drugs of choice in patients with severe gastroenteritis when Campylobacter is the presumed cause.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Campylobacter, a food borne pathogen, is a common cause (5–14%) of diarrhoea worldwide [1,2]. The incidence of the Campylobacte rjejuni infections in the United States and Europe exceeds the rates of the Salmonella and the Shigella infections combined [1]. In the developing countries, C.jejuni and C. coli have been recently recognized as the important causative agents of diarrhoea, especially during the hot and humid seasons [2], with the reported isolation rate ranging from 5% to 20% [3]. Indian studies have reported Campylobacter infections in 4.5-13.5% of the diarrhoea cases [4,5].

The ingestion of contaminated, undercooked food or water is the main cause of acquiring campylobacteriosis. The most common symptoms which are associated with the C.jejuni infection are diarrhoea of abrupt onset, which is accompanied by severe abdominal pain, with the passage of >8 stools on a single day and fever of >40oC. Faecal leukocytes and RBCs are detected in the stools of 75% of the infected persons [6]. Among the most serious complications, the Gullain-Barré Syndrome, the Miller Fisher Syndrome (acute polyneuropathy) and the Reiter’s Syndrome (reactive arthropathy) are remarkable. There is only little recent data of the association of the Campylobacter spp. with paediatric diarrhoeal patients and the organism’s antibiotic resistance pattern in the Indian population. An alarming recent trend is the rapid global emergence of Campylobacter strains which are resistant to the fluoroquinolones (FQ) and the macrolides, which are the most frequently used antimicrobials for the treatment of campylobacteriosis. The ciprofloxacin resistance in the C. jejuni isolates in Thailand was reported to be as high as 100%, while less than 5% of the C. jejuni and 14–36% of the C. coli isolates were resistant to the macrolides [7]. Their changing antimicrobial resistance patterns are an important public health issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stool samples were collected from 350 children (who were aged ≤12 years) who presented with acute diarrhoea (< 14days duration), who were admitted to the paediatric diarrhoea ward of Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India, from September 2010 to April 2012. After giving proper counselling, an informed consent was taken from the parents/guardians/persons who attended to the study subjects. A detailed personal history, the diarrhoeal episodes and the associated signs and symptoms were recorded on a predesigned proforma. The children who were on antimicrobial therapy were excluded from the study.

The samples were directly inoculated onto modified Charcoal Cefoperazoned esoxycholate agar (CCDA) (Oxoid®, Hampshire, United Kingdom) with a Campylobacter selective supplement (Butzler) (Oxoid®, Hampshire, United Kingdom), which contained bacitracin (12,500IU), cycloheximide (25mg), colistinsulfate (5,000IU), cephazolin sodium (7.5mg) and novobiocin (2.5mg) and a growth supplement (Oxoid®, Hampshire, United Kingdom). The incubation was done for 48 hours at 42°C under microaerophilic conditions (5% O2, 5% CO2, 2% H2, and 88% N2 by volume) by using the ANOXOMAT AN2OP system (Mart Microbiology®, Drachten, Netherlands). The suspected, moist, translucent colonies were identified by using a modified Gram’s stain and the oxidase test.The isolates quinowere speciated by using biochemical tests such as the catalase test, hippurate hydrolysis, growth on 1% glycine and 1.5% NaCl and susceptibility to nalidixic acid (30ug). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all the isolates was carried out by using the Kirby- Bauer disk diffusion method. Bacterial suspensions were made in Mueller-Hinton broth upto a density equivalent of a 0.5 MacFarland’s turbidity standard. Mueller Hinton agar which was enriched with 5% sheep blood (in house) was used for performing the test. Nine antimicrobial agents, namely, amoxicillin (25μg), cefotaxime (30μg), gentamicin (10μg), amikacin (30μg),tetracycline (30μg), chloramphenicol (30μg), erythromycin(15μg), ciprofloxacin(5μg), and nalidixic acid(30μg)(HiMedia®, Mumbai) were tested according to the CLSI guidelines [8].

RESULTS

A total of 36 (10.28%) children with diarrhoea were positive for the Campylobacter infection by the culture method. The mean age of the children with the Campylobacter infection was 9 months, with a peak incidence (18.96%) in the children who were below 1 year of age. All the 36 isolates of C. jejuni were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibilities by using the disc diffusion technique [Table/Fig-1].

Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Campylobacter Isolates

NA, nalidixic acid; Cipro, ciprofloxaxin; Tet, tetracycline; Ery, erythromycin; Cefo, cefotaxime; Genta, gentamicin; Amika, amikacin; Chlor, Chloramphenicol; Amox, amoxicillin.

All the isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and most (86.11%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. The resistance to tetracycline was 33.33%, that to erythromycin was 22.2%, that to both gentamicin and cefotaxime was 13.9%, that to chloramphenicol was 11.88% and that to amoxicillin was 8.33%. Only one isolate was found to be resistant to amikacin.

Multi-drug resistance (resistance to three or more agents) was found in 15/36 (41.66%) isolates [Table/Fig-2]. The most common combinations which showed drug resistance were nalidixic acidciprofloxacin- erythromycin-tetracycline (n=4) and nalidixic acidciprofloxacin- amoxicillin-cefotaxime (n=3).

Resistance Patternsof Campylobacter Isolates(N = 36)

ProfileNo. of isolates*
No resistance demonstrated0
Resistance to one agent (n=13, 36.11%)NA/Cipro11
NA alone2
Resistance to two agents (n=8, 22.22%)NA/Cipro-Tet2
NA/Cipro-Ery1
NA/Cipro-Cefo1
NA/Cipro-Genta1
NA/Cipro-Amika1
NA/Cipro-Chlor1
NA-Genta1
Resistance to three agents (n=13, 36.11%)NA/Cipro-Ery-Tet4
NA/Cipro-Amox-Cefo3
NA/Cipro-Ery-Chlor2
NA/Cipro-Tet-Amox1
NA/Cipro-Tet-Genta1
NA/Cipro-Genta-Cefo1
NA/Cipro-Tet-Cefo1
Resistance to four agents (n=2, 5.55%)NA/Cipro-Tet-Genta-Ery1
NA-Genta-Tet-Chlor1

DISCUSSION

Campylobacter species are primarily zoonotic, with a wide variety of wild and domestic animals, especially birds implicated as reservoir [1]. Campylobacter gastroenteritis is especially common among children who are less than 5 years of age, with an isolation rate of around 57.6% in the developing countries [9]. Studies done in Kolkata and Bangladesh showed that children below 12 months of age were predominantly infected [10,11]. Living with animals under the same roof, the presence of uncovered garbage in cooking areas, lack of a safe water supply and lack of knowledge about the sanitary disposal of faeces are the main risk factors behind the acquiring of this infection. The consumption and handling of chicken as a primary source of the Campylobacter infection have been documented in a previous Indian study [12]. A high prevalence (48% to 64%) of C. jejuni in the chicken samples, which was detected in different parts of India, incriminated poultry as the reservoir of human campylobactereriosis [4,12]. Most typically, the infection with C. results in an acute, self-limited, gastrointestinal illness which is characterized by diarrhoea, fever and abdominal cramps. Antimicrobial use in both humans and animals may be the most important factor for the development of bacteria, with increased resistance and virulence.The rate of resistance to these drugs in the developing countries, which is higher as compared to that in the developed countries, may be due to their use for infections other than gastroenteritis and self medication.

A previous Indian study reported a high resistance (71.4%) of the Campylobacter spp. to ciprofloxacin and only 6.1% resistance to erythromycin [5]. In our present study, a similar percentage (86.11%) of ciprofloxacin resistance was detected but a greater (22.2%) resistance to erythromycin was identified. The use of fluoroquinolones in the veterinary practice as growth promoters indiscriminates the use of this antimicrobial and this may explain the dramatic rise in resistance among the Campylobacter strains. Till date, erythromycin is the drug of choice for campylobacter gastroenteritis, and the low resistance which was shown in our study emphasises its future usefulness for the treatment of this infection. Multidrug resistance is not rare in Campylobacter. Jain et al., found multidrug resistance in 30.6% of the strains [5]. A high prevalence of the multi drug resistant strains of C. jejuni which originated from humans, broilers and pigs were also reported from southeast Asia. Most often, the strains were resistant to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline.

It was also observed in many studies, that the duration of diarrhoea, the hospital stay and the risk of invasive illness or death were influenced by the antimicrobial resistance of the Campylobacter isolates [13,14]. Hence, a high resistance to the quinowere lones and the macrolides and multidrug resistance warrant the reconsideration of their use as the drugs of choice in patients with severe gastroenteritis, when Campylobacter is the presumed cause [15].

Overall, the present study provides the recent trend of the antimicrobial susceptibility of the C. jejuni isolates in children, which would be helpful for clinicians to start an empirical therapy for the acute diarrhoea cases. The demonstration of a rising resistance pattern for most of the antimicrobials, reinforces the fact that the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials, both in the human and the veterinary fields, should be controlled. Antibiotic policies need to be strictly adhered to, to prevent further worsening of the situation. The implementation of a surveillance on the susceptibility pattern of the Campylobacter isolates from chicken, which can transfer resistant strains to humans, is highly recommended.

References

[1]Altekruse SF, Stern NJ, Fields PI, Swerdlow DL, Campylobacter jejuni—An Emerging Foodborne Pathogen Emerg Infect Dis 1999 5(1):28-35.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Coker AO, Isokpehi RD, Thomas BN, Amisu KO, Obi CL, Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries Emerg Infect Dis 2002 8:237-44.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Oberhelman RA, Taylor DN, Campylobacter infections in developing countries. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, editors Campylobacter 2000 2ndWashingtonAmerican Society for Microbiology:139-53.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Rajendran P, Babji S, George AT, Rajan DP, Kang G, Ajjampur SS, Detection and species identification of Campylobacter in stool samples of children and animals from Vellore, south India Indian J Med Microbiol 2012 30(1):85-88.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Jain D, Sinha S, Prasad KN, Pandey CM, Campylobacter species and drug resistance in a north Indian rural community Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2005 99(3):207-14.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Blaser MJ, Berkowitz ID, LaForce FM, Cravens J, Reller LB, Wang WLL, Campylobacter enteritis: clinical and epidemiologic features Ann Intern Med 1979 Aug 91(2):179-85.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Serichantalergs O, Jensen LB, Pitarangsi C, Mason CJ, Dalsgaard A, A possible mechanism of macrolide resistance among multiple resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from Thai children during 1991–2000 Southeast Asian. J Trop Med Public Health 2007 38(3):501-06.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstitutePerformance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests Approved standards 2009 2910th(1)CLSI document. M02-A10  [Google Scholar]

[9]Prasad KN, Dixit AK, Ayyagari A, Campylobacter species associated with diarrhoea in patients from a tertiary care centre of north India Indian J Med Res 2001 Jul 114:12  [Google Scholar]

[10]Bhadra RK, Dutta P, Bhattacharya SK, Dutta SK, Pal SC, Nair GB, Campylobacter species as a cause of diarrhoea in children in Calcutta J Infect 1992 Jan 24(1):55-62.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Albert MJ, Faruque AS, Faruque SM, Sack RB, Mahalanabis D, Case control study of enteropathogens associated with childhood diarrhea in Dhaka, Bangladesh J Clin Microbiol 1999 37:3458-64.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Chattopadhyay UK, Rashid M, Sur SK, Pal D, The occurrence of campylobacteriosis in domestic animals and their handlers in and around Calcutta J Med Microbiol 2001Oct 50(10):933-34.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Tambur Zoran Ž, Igor M. Stojanov, Sonja M. Konstantinovi, Dara V. Jovanovi, Desanka Ceni-Miloševi, Dolores N. Opai, Multi drug resistance of campylobacter jejuni and campylobacter coli to tested antibiotics in strains originating from humans, poultry and swine Zbornik Maticesrpskezaprirodnenauke 2010 118:27-35.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Nelson JM, Smith KE, Vugia DJ, Rabatsky-Ehr T, Segler SD, Kassenborg HD, Prolonged diarrhea due to ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter infection J Infect Dis 2004; 15 190(6):1150-7.Epub 2004 Aug 3  [Google Scholar]

[15]Helms M, Simonsen J, Olsen KEP, Mølbak K, Adverse health events associated with antimicrobialdrug resistance in Campylobacter species:A registry-based cohort study J Infect Dis 2005 191:1050-55.  [Google Scholar]