JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Original Article DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4882.2630
Year : 2012 | Month : Dec | Volume : 6 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : 1675 - 1680

The Reference Intervals for the Haematological Parameters in Healthy Adult Population of Chennai, Southern India

Subhashree A.R.1, P.J Parameaswari2, B. Shanthi3, C. Revathy4, B.O. Parijatham5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India
3 Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India
4 Post Graduate, Department of Biochemistry, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India
5 Professor, Department of Pathology Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital, Bharath University, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India

NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:Dr. A.R.Subhashree,Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Sree Balaji Medical College, Chrompet, Chennai 600004, India.
Phone: 9840243628
E-mail: subhashree_sai@yahoo.in


The haematological parameters are influenced by various factors like age, ethnicity, diet, genetic and gender differences and hence it is important to define the specific reference values with regards to the age, gender and the region. The indices like the Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW), the Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and the Platelet Distribution Width (PDW) are newer haematological parameters which are calculated by automated haematology analyzers. There is an increasing evidence that these are clinically valuable bio markers. But not many studies have estimated the reference intervals for these parameters in our population.

Aim and Objective

Our primary objective was to identify the gender specific reference intervals for RDW, MPV, PDW and other haematological parameters for the healthy adult population of our region. We also aimed at comparing the study reference intervals with the existing reference ranges.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of 2443 medical case sheets of the individuals who attended the preventive health check up program in a tertiary care hospital in the year 2011, was done. With 500 subjects who satisfied our study criteria, the haematological reference intervals were established.


Gender specific reference intervals were established for the newer indices as well as for the other haematological parameters. We derived the reference intervals for the newer parameters in our population as:


12.23%-15.36% in males and 12.3%-15.85% in females MPV: 7.9 fL-13.7 fL in males and 8 fL -13.28 fL in females


9 fL -16.56 fL in males and 8 fL -13.28 fL in females.


Our values differed from the existing haematological reference values, thus showing the importance of developing region-specific reference intervals. Our data also showed the importance of establishing gender specific reference intervals.



The clinical utility of the analyzer derived haematological indices has been explored in the recent years and it was found to be varied and tremendous. The RDW was originally found to be useful only in classifying anaemias [1]. Later on, studies have proved its potential as a bio marker in various non haematological entities like cardiac failure [2] coronary artery disease [3] and inflammatory bowel disease [4]. Furthermore, it has also been considered as a mortality predictor, particularly for CVD (Cardio Vascular Diseases), [5].

MPV has also been observed to predict the cardio vascular disease related mortality [6] and studies have shown its role as a prognostic marker in cerebro vascular stroke [7].

PDW, when analyzed along with the other platelet parameters, helps in the differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis [8].

There is a need to establish the reference values for these clinically useful parameters in our local population, but until now, the data are lacking. Moreover, Chennai has a high prevalence of nutritional anaemias [9] as well as Cardio Vascular Diseases (CVD) related mortality [10] and so, the reference values for RDW and MPV will be of help for a better interpretation of the haematological results. Moreover, the reference values which have been established by the studies which were done in different geographic locations may not reflect the normalcy of the population in question and so, it is always desirable to identify the region specific reference intervals.


To generate reference ranges (2.5 percentile to 97.5 percentile) for all the haematological parameters which included the RDW, PDW and the MPV of healthy adult males and females who were aged 18-70 years in our local population and to test their significance.

To compare the study reference values with the existing reference ranges for the genders and to find out the percentage of the individuals who lie outside the existing reference ranges (outliers) if the study reference values were applied.

To test for the significance of the age specific reference intervals.

Material And Methods

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by our institutional research and ethical committee.

The study Population and the Subject Recruitment

We carried out a retrospective study; the reference population comprised of healthy adults who were aged 18-70 years, who had undergone preventive health check ups in our hospital from January to December of 2011. Their medical history and clinical examination details were retrieved from the medical records. Out of the 2443 case sheets which were screened, five hundred (20.4% of the subjects) were selected, based on the inclusion and the exclusion as per the IFCC protocol [11].

Inclusion criteria

18-70 years of age

Both the genders

Exclusion Criteria

Pathophysiological States - Renal failure, cardiac diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, liver diseases, malabsorption syndromes, malignancies and haematological disorders which included anaemias.

Systemic Diseases – Hypertension and Diabetes mellitus.

The chronic intake of pharmacologically active agents like alcohol, tobacco or oral contraceptives, (for more than six months during the time of the health checkup).

Replacement or Supplementation Therapy e.g. Thyroxine, Insulin

Modified Physiological States - Pregnancy, psychological and mental disorders -exercise/physical training /food intake prior to blood collection.

Other Factors - Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2).

The institutional SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) were followed for the sample collection and for conducting the tests.

Sample collection

All samples were collected between 7.00 am and 10 am. 3ml of whole blood was collected from the cubital vein with a vacutainer system into k3 EDTA tubes.

Tests: A complete haemogram was done by using a Sysmex KX-21 haematology analyzer within four hours of the blood collection. Dedicated reagents and standard methodologies were used. The 2-level quality controls were run every day and the analyzer was maintained according to the manufacturer’s instructions during the entire period of the study. The ESR estimation was done by using the Westergren method according to the ICSH protocol [12].

Statistical Analysis

The data for the haematological parameters were collected and analyzed by using SPSS, version 16.0. The point estimate of the mean and the median with an interval estimate of 2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile were provided as the reference values. The inferential statistics student t-test was done for the difference of all the parameters between the genders and the age at a 5% level of significance.


Among the 500 individuals, 248 (49.6%) were females and 252 (50.4%) were males. [Table/Fig-1] shows the age-gender distribution of the reference individuals. A majority of them (70%) were in the 25 to 55 years age group.

Frequency histograms were prepared for all the analytes and they showed the Gaussian distribution. [Table/Fig-2] and [Table/Fig-3] showed the Gaussian distribution of the RDW among the males and females in the histogram.

The means ± standard error and the study reference interval (2.5 – 97.5 percentile) for the males and the females are presented in [Table/Fig-4]. The reference intervals were calculated, based on the IFCC and the CLSI [13] guidelines. The males had a higher mean RBC count (5.10 X1012/L versus 4.39X1012/L), haemoglobin (14.43 g/dL versus 12.14 g/dL), haematocrit (41.63% versus 35.85%), MCH (28.74 pg versus 28.07 pg), MCHC (34.81% versus 34.19%) and PDW (13.07fL versus 11.96fL), whereas the females had a higher mean WBC count (8.45 X109/L versus 8.26 X109/L), MCV (81.77 fL versus 81.67 fL), Platelet count (261.60 X109/L versus 242.26 X109/L), RDW (13.72% versus 13.66%) and MPV (10.10 fL versus 9.71 fL) than their counterparts.

Statistically significant gender based differences in the means were observed for all the RBC parameters ( i.e. RBC count, haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCH and MCHC) except for MCV and RDW, for all the platelet parameters (Platelet count, PDW and MPV) and for ESR. The WBC (total count, differential lymphocytes%, and neutrophils %) did not show significant differences among the genders except for a differential mixed %.

Our study reference intervals were compared with the existing reference values [Table/Fig-5]. These values are currently in use in our laboratory and they were derived, based on the literature and the standard reference books [14-17]. The lower limits of the RBC count, haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCV and MCH were comparably lower; more so in females. Both the lower and the upper limits showed an increase with the RDW and the MPV values in both males and females. MCHC and the WBC parameters, the total count and the differential lymphocyte % showed a mild increase in the upper limits. An increase in the upper limit of ESR (with 30.2% males and 38.3% females as the outliers) was observed in comparison with the existing reference values. MCHC showed the maximum percentage of the study individuals (64.3% of the males and 44% of the females) outside the existing reference values, followed by MCV (63.1% of the males and 59.3% of the females).

Age-Gender distribution of Reference Individuals

Histogram of RDW for Males

Histogram of RDW for females

The reference individuals were further sub classified into more homogenous groups by stratifying them according to two intervals of age (<45 and >45years).

[Table/Fig-6] shows the mean values of the males and females when they were stratified according to the age. Statistically significant age related differences in the mean values of the RBC, haemoglobin, MCV, MCH, MCHC, platelets, PDW and ESR were observed in the males. However, among the females, haemoglobin, MPV and ESR showed statistically significant age related differences in the mean values.

Study reference interval s, Existing reference interval and the percentage of outliers

NStudy Reference intervalExisting Reference interval% of individuals outside the existing reference interval
RBC X1012/LMales2524.01-6.044.5-5.536.5
Hb g/dLMales25211.13-17.4013.0-17.020.2
HCT %Males25233.07-49.9740-5030.2
MCV fLMales25273.33-91.7483-10163.1
MCH pgMales25224.00.10-33.4027-3222.2
MCHC g/dLMales25232.10-36.9032-34.564.3
RDW %Males25212.23-15.3611.5-14.511.5
WBC X109/LMales2521.63-13.531.0-10.019.0
Lymphocytes %Males25218.13-48.0020-4021.4
Platelets X109/LMales252148.32-404150-4005.6
PDW fLMales2529.00-16.5610-17.911.5
MPV fLMales2527.90-13.707.2-11.79.1
ESR mm/hrMales2524.00-52.70Up to 1430.2
Females2484.00-73.55Up to 2038.3

Reference Intervals, Means and Standard Errors of the Reference Population (Males and Females) *Statistical significance at p <0.05

ParameterMales( N=252)Females (N=248)P value
2.5 percentile-97.5 percentile reference intervalMean ±S.E2.5 percentile-97.5 percentile reference intervalMean ±S.E
RBC X1012/L4.01-6.045.10 ±0.033.44-5.304.39 ±0.03.000*
Hb g/dL11.13-17.4014.43 ±0.099.22-14.6712.14 ±0.08.000*
HCT %33.07-49.9741.63 ±0.2529.00-42.7835.85 ±0.21.000*
MCV fL73.33-91.7481.67 ±0.3071.80-90.8281.77 ±0.31.819
MCH pg24.10-33.4028.74 ±0.1424.00-31.9628.07 ±0.13.001*
MCHC g/dL32.10-36.9034.81 ±0.0731.00-36.9634.19 ±0.08.000*
RDW %12.23-15.3613.66 ±0.0512.3--15.8513.72 ±0.05.456
WBC cells X109/L4.63-13.538.26 ±0.144.60-12.958.45 ±0.14.347
Lymphocytes %18.13-48.0033.11 ±0.4912.00-52.5532.27 ±0.63.295
Mixed%2.00-16.407.52 ±0.222.00-19.836.77 ±0.29.043*
Neutrophils%44.46-75.6759.44 ±0.5137.85-82.3161.04 ±0.68.062
Platelets X109/L148.32-404242.26 ±3.84146.90-408.78261.6 ±4.42.001*
PDW fL9.00-16.5613.07 ±0.158.60-16.1011.96 ±0.12.000*
MPV fL7.90-13.709.71 ±0.088.00-13.2810.1 ±0.09.002*
ESR mm/hr4.00-52.7014.45 ±0.734.00-73.5521.31 ±1.09.000*

Mean and standard error for age specific reference intervals *Statistical significance at p <0.05

ParameterMales<45 years (n=155) Mean (S.E)Males > 45 years (n=97) Mean (S.E)Females <45 years (n=151) Mean (S.E)Females >45 years (n=97) Mean (S.E.)
WBC cells 103/¼L8.25 (0.18)8.26 (0.22)8.49 (0.17)8.37 (0.24)
RBC millions / ¼L4.93 (0.05)5.21 (0.03)*4.36 (0.04)4.44 (0.04)
Hb g/dL14.1 (0.12)14.8 (0.15) *12.01 (0.10)12.35 (0.13)*
HCT %41.34 (0.30)42.09 (0.43)35.60 (0.27)36.24 (0.33)
MCV fL79.23 (0.27)85.55 (0.44) *81.44 (0.42)82.27 (0.46)
MCH pg27.41 (0.11)30.87 (0.17) *28.05 (0.17)28.10 (0.19)
MCHC g/dL34.53 (0.08)35.25 (0.11) *34.24 (0.10)34.12 (0.11)
Platelets 103/¼L252.6 (5.19)225.64 (5.18) *260.17 (5.43)263.85 (7.53)
Lymphocytes %33.7 (0.64)32.18 (0.77)32.39 (0.78)32.08 (1.08)
Mixed%7.5 (0.29)7.47 (0.35)6.80 (0.38)6.73 (0.44)
Neutrophils%58.7 (0.66)60.63 (0.79)60.98 (0.81)61.13 (1.19)
RDW %13.7 (0.06)13.4 (0.07) *13.66 (0.07)13.81 (0.08)
PDW fL13.4 (0.19)12.55 (0.24) *12.11 (0.15)11.72 (0.19)
MPV fL9.65 (0.10)9.81 (0.13)10.23 (0.12)9.88 (0.13)*
ESR mm/hr13.0 (0.62)16.65 (1.61) *19.00 (1.06)21.93 (2.22)*

To understand the effect of age and gender on the RDW, graphs were plotted between the mean value and the age [Table/Fig-7]. Females showed a gradual rise in the RDW values with age, but the RDW values of the males showed a decreasing trend.


We observed a high exclusion rate of about 80% while we conducted the study, based on the inclusion and the exclusion criteria. This was because of the high prevalence of clinical anaemia and Diabetes mellitus in our local population.

Statistically significant gender based differences were found for the following parameters and hence, separate reference intervals for the two genders should be considered: RBC count, haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCH, MCHC, Platelets, MPV, PDW and ESR.

We observed that when our reference intervals were compared with the existing reference ranges which are primarily derived from the western literature, there was a decrease in our study reference intervals for all the red cell parameters except for MCHC in both the genders. This was in agreement with the observations which were made by other Indian authors [18,19]. This decrease could be attributed to the prevalence of nutritional deficiencies and worm infestations in our population and this issue needs to be further addressed. The percentage of the reference individuals with values outside the current reference, ranged between 1-64%. The outliers were more for the RBC parameters and for ESR. This highlights the necessity of deriving region specific reference ranges.

The platelet count values did not show much differences from the existing reference values (5-6% outliers). This observation was in contrast to those of the previous studies from our region [20], who had reported a lower upper limit of the platelet count.

The total WBC count and the differential lymphocyte percentage and importantly, the ESR values were higher among our reference individuals. This could be due to the vulnerability of our population to infections. All the RBC parameters except RDW showed a statistically significant increase with age, particularly in males. This increase was not evident in females, though haemoglobin showed a significant change. Both of them showed an increase in the ESR values with age.

In our study, we observed an increase in both the limits of the RDW and the MPV for both the genders as compared to that in the literature [15,17]. The possibility of the prevalence of sub clinical nutritional anaemias would have had an impact on the RDW. At the same time, an increase in the risk of CVD among the local population cannot be under estimated [21] and its risk factors could have influenced both the parameters. This observation merits further studies.


Gender specific reference intervals are essential as there were statistically significant gender related differences in the RBC parameters, the platelet parameters and ESR. The reference intervals which were established by our study differed from the existing reference values.

A high increase in the upper limits of the ESR which was both age and gender related, shows that age as well as the gender based reference intervals needed to be considered for this parameter.

Though it is practically difficult to include age specific reference intervals in our haematology report for all the cases, it is always useful while studies are conducted where such parameters are used.

We derived the reference intervals for the newer parameters in our population as: RDW:

12.23%-15.36% in males and 12.3%-15.85% in females


7.9 fL-13.7 fL in males and 8 fL -13.28 fL in females


9 fL -16.56 fL in males and 8 fL -13.28 fL in females.

We prefer gender specific reference intervals for all the three parameters.

We observed an increase in both the limits of the RDW and the MPV values in both males and females. This is a very valuable observation to define the cutoff points for both of them while evaluating for the risk of CVD and its associated mortality.

Future Recommendations

A population based study which correlates ESR with the other markers of inflammation might throw light on the reasons for the higher values of this parameter in our reference population.

A large cohort study is essential to precisely evaluate the age related changes in the RDW, MPV and the PDW.

An analytical study on the RDW and the MPV changes in the individuals who are at a risk for cardiovascular diseases may also be contributory.


[1]Bessman J, Gilmer PR, JrGardner FH, An improved classification of anemias on the basis of their MCV and RDW Am J Clin Pathol 1983 80(3):322-26.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Hammarsten O, Jacobsson S, Fu M, The red cell distribution width in chronic heart failure: a new independent marker for its prognosis? European Journal of Heart Failure 2010 12:213-14.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Çetin M, Kocaman SA, Bostan M, Çanga A, Çiçek Y, Erdo an T, The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and its association with the coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with stable angina pectoris Eur J Gen Med 2012 9(1):7-13.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Oustamanolakis P, Koutroubakis IE, Kouroumalis EA, Diagnosing anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: beyond the established markers Crohns Colitis 2011 5(5):381-91.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Patel KV, Ferrucci L, Ershler WB, Longo DL, Guralnik JM, The red blood cell distribution width and the risk of death in middle-aged and older adults Arch Intern Med 2009 169(5):515-23.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Chu SG, Becker RC, Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Eikelboom JW, Konkle B, The mean platelet volume as a predictor of the cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Thromb Haemost 2010 8(1):148-56.Epub 2009 Aug 19  [Google Scholar]

[7]Mayda-Domaç F, Misirli H, Yilmaz MJ, The prognostic roles of the mean platelet volume and the platelet count in ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2010 19(1):66-72.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Osselaer JC, Jamart J, Scheiff JM, The platelet distribution width for the differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis Clinical Chemistry 1997 43(6):1072-76.  [Google Scholar]

[9]India’s Undernourished Children: A call for reform and action, World Bank Report.: http://sitereis.worldbank.org/Health nutrition and population/Reis/281627-1095698140167/IndiaUndernourishedChildrenFinal.pdf last accessed on 24/6/12  [Google Scholar]

[10]Viswanathan M, Janarthanan VV, Rajendra P, The epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: The Indian Scenario J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010 4(1):158-70.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Solberg HE, The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. The Expert Panel on the Theory of Reference Values: An approved recommendation on the theory of the reference values. Part 2. The selection of individuals for the production of the reference values J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987 25:639-44.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Jou JM, Lewis SM, Briggs C, Lee SH, De La Salle B, McFadden S, The International Council for Standardization in Haematology. An ICSH review of the measurement of the erythocyte sedimentation rate J Lab Hematol 2011 33(2):125-32.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Horowitz GL, Altaie S, Boyd JC, Ceriotti F, Garg U, Horn P. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and IFCC. Defining, establishing, and verifying the reference intervals in a clinical laboratory; Approved Guideline-Third edition. C28-A3, Vol.28. No.30. [internet] [cited 2012 June 20]. Available from: www.clsi.org  [Google Scholar]

[14]Dacie JV, Lewis SM, Practical Hematology. 8th edition Churchill Livingstone 1994 New YorkU.S.A;14  [Google Scholar]

[15]Demirin H, Ozhan H, Ucgun T, Celer A, Bulur S, Cil H, The normal range of the mean platelet volume in healthy subjects: Insights from a large epidemiologic study Thromb Res 2011 128(4):358-60.Oct  [Google Scholar]

[16]Farias MG, Schunck EG, Dal Bó S, de Castro SM, The definition of the reference ranges for the platelet distribution width (PDW): a local need Clin Chem Lab Med 2010 48(2):255-57.Feb;  [Google Scholar]

[17]Kumar, Abbas, Fausto, Aster. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 8th edition. Elsevier; 2010  [Google Scholar]

[18]Ashavaid TF, Todur SP, Dherai AJ, The establishment of reference intervals in the Indian population Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry 2005 20(2):110-18.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Sundaram M, Mohanakrishnan J, Murugavel KG, Shankar EM, Solomon S, Srinivas CN, Ethnic variations in certain hematological and biochemical reference intervals in a southern Indian healthy adult population Eur J Intern Med 2008 19(1):46-50.Jan  [Google Scholar]

[20]Balasubramaniam U, Pandeya P, Sairam S, Suhasini, Sehkar L. Hematological and biochemical values in the Indian population- defining the reference intervals. AHERF Educational and Research Foundation. [internet] [cited 2012 June 20]. Available from: http://www.aherf.org  [Google Scholar]

[21]Jeemon P, Prabhakaran D, Huffman, Ramakrishnan L, Goenka S, Thankappan KR et al on behalf of the Sentinel Surveillance in Industrial Populations Study Group. The distribution of a 10-year and a lifetime predicted risk for cardiovascular disease in the Indian Sentinel Surveillance Study population (cross-sectional survey results). BMJ. Open 2011;[internet] [cited 2102 June 20] Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com  [Google Scholar]