JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Ophthalmology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2025/75537.20469
Year : 2025 | Month : Jan | Volume : 19 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : NC01 - NC04

Microtrabeculectomy versus Conventional Trabeculectomy in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Prospective Interventional Study

Rekha Ramesh Mudhol1, Ameena Shirin2

1 Professor and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangaramma Sajjan Campus, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.
2 Postgraduate, Department of Ophthalmology, Shri BM Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bangaramma Sajjan Campus, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Ameena Shirin, Room No. B26, NRI Hostel, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangaramma Sajjan Campus, Solapur Road, Vijayapura-586103, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: ameenashirin3@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Glaucoma is a group of multifactorial, irreversible, progressive optic neuropathies characterised by the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Trabeculectomy has been widely accepted as the gold-standard intervention for glaucoma for more than 30 years. A newer technique, microtrabeculectomy, was introduced to overcome the ocular complications encountered with Conventional Trabeculectomy (CT).

Aim

To compare the efficacy of microtrabeculectomy with CT in treating Primary Open-angle Glaucoma (POAG).

Materials and Methods

A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre (tertiary care centre), BLDE (DU), Vijayapura, North Karnataka, India, from June 2023 to August 2024. The study included 16 cases diagnosed with POAG, divided into two groups of eight patients each: Group-I- Microtrabeculectomy and Group-II- CT. Preoperative baseline characteristics were documented for all cases. They were followed-up for a three-month period to check for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and any complications.

Results

The mean preoperative and three-month postoperative IOP in Group-I was 30.75±6.04 and 13.87±2.80 mmHg, respectively, whereas in Group-II, it was 30.0±7.27 and 14.12±2.80 mmHg, respectively. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups (p<0.001). However, the differences in postoperative IOP values at the follow-ups and the differences in preoperative IOP values between both groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed more frequently in Group-II compared to Group-I.

Conclusion

Microtrabeculectomy is a safe procedure with efficacy comparable to CT for reducing IOP, while producing good filtering blebs with fewer complications.

Keywords

Best corrected visual acuity,Cup disc ratio,Filtration surgery,Intraocular pressure

Introduction

Glaucoma encompasses a group of diseases characterised by irreversible and progressive damage to the neuroretinal fibres, with characteristic structural damage to the optic nerve and corresponding visual dysfunction caused by various pathological processes [1]. It is the second most common cause of blindness after cataracts and is globally the leading cause of irreversible blindness [2]. The prevalence of glaucoma among individuals aged 40-80 years is 3.54% [3]. India has an estimated 12 million cases of glaucoma and accounts for approximately one-fifth of the global glaucoma burden. POAG is a more common variant compared to Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma (PACG), accounting for approximately three-fourths of all glaucoma cases [2]. India contributes to 12.9% of global POAG blindness and 12.7% of PACG blindness [3].

A common characteristic of glaucoma is optic neuropathy, which results from various risk factors such as older age, hypertension, diabetes, high myopia, trauma, steroid overuse, lower ocular perfusion pressure and increased IOP [2]. IOP and the aqueous humour dynamics that regulate the pressure are factors that can be controlled to prevent the progression of optic neuropathy [4]. Trabeculectomy, introduced in 1968 by Watson and Cairns, is the standard surgical intervention for managing glaucoma, with a success rate between 67% and 94% in primary glaucoma cases [5]. A fistula is created to connect the Anterior Chamber (AC) with the subtenon space, permitting a bypass from the trabecular meshwork by the aqueous humour [6]. Several postoperative complications, such as early postoperative aqueous leak (21%), postoperative hyphema (18%-38%), initiation or progression of cataract formation (10%-20%) and failing bleb due to conjunctival or episcleral fibrosis, are observed with this procedure [7].

To overcome these complications, a novel technique of creating a fistula into the subconjunctival space with minimal disruption of conjunctiva and ocular tissues, which does not induce significant astigmatism, has been described. This technique is known as small flap trabeculectomy or microtrabeculectomy [8].

Many previous studies have attempted to compare the safety and efficacy of microtrabeculectomy with CT in POAG patients, but no study has reached a clear conclusion. Additionally, not many studies have been conducted in the Indian context [9,10]. Thus, the current study aimed to compare the efficacy of microtrabeculectomy with CT in treating POAG.

Materials and Methods

A prospective interventional study was performed in the Department of Ophthalmology at Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre (tertiary care centre), BLDE (DU), Vijayapura, North Karnataka, India, from June 2023 to August 2024. The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and institutional ethical clearance was obtained (Ethical clearance approval number: BLDE (DU)/IEC/684/2022-23). After explaining the nature of the procedure and the associated risks and benefits to the patients, informed consent was obtained. The study focused on patients diagnosed with POAG who required filtration surgery.

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with POAG, who had raised IOP values and were willing to undergo filtration surgery, were enrolled in the present study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with PACG, secondary and congenital glaucoma, a history of previous intraocular surgery in the same eye, rubeotic eye, uveitis and those unwilling to participate in the study were excluded.

Sample size: A total of 16 patients were included based on convenience sampling.

Study Procedure

The patients were divided into two groups of eight each: Group-I underwent microtrabeculectomy and Group-II underwent CT. Demographic characteristics, preoperative IOP readings, Cup-to-Disc (C:D) ratio, angle grading and visual fields of the participants were obtained and tabulated.

Surgical procedure: The surgery was performed by a single surgeon under local peribulbar anaesthesia. After painting and draping, a wire speculum was placed and a superior rectus bridle suture was secured.

Group-I: Small flap trabeculectomy (microtrabeculectomy)

After the conjunctival flap was fashioned, a square-shaped lamellar scleral flap measuring 2×2 mm (1/2 to 1/3 of the thickness of the sclera) was created with the limbus as the base and dissected up to the level where the bluish-grey zone is at least 1 mm exposed. AC entry was made at the anterior end using Vannas scissors. A Kelly Descemet membrane punch was used to remove 1×1 mm of the trabecular meshwork. The scleral flap was approximated using a single 10-0 monofilament suture after performing the peripheral iridectomy. The conjunctival flap was then approximated using continuous 10-0 monofilament sutures [Table/Fig-1a,b].

a) Conjunctival flap is fashioned; b) 2×2 mm square shaped lamellar scleral flap.

Group-II: Conventional Trabeculectomy (CT) [9]

A conjunctival flap was created, after which a partial thickness, limbal-based, lamellar, square-shaped scleral flap measuring 5×5 mm (1/2 to 1/3 of the thickness of the sclera) was performed. The flap was extended well past the limbus into the clear cornea until the bluish-grey zone was exposed up to 1 mm. Adjacent to the scleral spur anteriorly a block of tissue measuring 1×4 mm was excised manually. The scleral flap was approximated to the scleral bed using 10-0 monofilament sutures after a broad-based peripheral iridectomy was performed. The conjunctival flap was then approximated with a continuous 10-0 monofilament suture [Table/Fig-2a,b].

Scleral and conjunctival flap suturing in Conventional Trabeculectomy (CT).

Postoperative course: Antibiotic-steroid eye drops were administered six times daily to all patients and gradually tapered over six weeks. Patients were evaluated on the first postoperative day and followed-up at one week, six weeks and three-month intervals. On the first postoperative day, patients were examined for conjunctival inflammation, bleb characteristics, corneal oedema, formation of the AC and hyphema. In subsequent follow-ups, IOP recording was performed using Goldmann’s applanation tonometer.

Success criteria: Success was achieved when the postoperative IOP was in the range of 6 to 21 mmHg according to the World Glaucoma Association (WGA) [11].

Complete success: IOP less than or equal to 21 mmHg without any topical antiglaucoma agents [11].

Qualified success: IOP less than or equal to 21 mmHg with the requirement of antiglaucoma medications to achieve the target [11].

Failure: IOP greater than 21 mmHg or less than 5 mmHg with medications based on two consecutive follow-up visits, at least one week apart [11].

Statistical Analysis

Data was documented in Microsoft Excel and analysed using statistical software R 3.6.3. Continuous variables and categorical variables were represented by mean±Standard Deviation (SD) and frequency tables, respectively. The Chi-square test or independent samples t-test was employed to check for associations. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The study was conducted on 16 patients aged 40 to 80 years with POAG. The patients were divided into two groups: Group-I, which underwent microtrabeculectomy and Group-II, which underwent CT, with eight patients in each group. The demographic details and baseline characteristics of the patients in both groups is illustrated in [Table/Fig-3].

Demographic details and baseline characteristics of the patients and in the groups.

CharacteristicsMean±SDMedian (Range)
Age (in years)61.18±9.3365 (53.75, 68.25)
C:D ratio0.8±0.080.8 (0.7, 0.9)
Preop IOP (mmHg)30.37±6.4628 (25.75, 33.5)

The ages of the patients included in this study ranged from 53.75 to 68.25 years, with a mean of 61.18±9.33 years. Two patients in Group-I were on previous antiglaucoma medication, while one patient in Group-II was also on previous antiglaucoma medication. In total, 13 patients (6 in Group-I and 7 in Group-II) were newly diagnosed. The Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of one patient in Group-I and two patients in Group-II was ≤6/60 on the Snellen chart. All the remaining patients in both groups had a BCVA of >6/60 (7 in Group-I and 6 in Group-II). In Group-I, 4 cases (50%) had a C:D of 0.7; in Group-II, 1 case (12.5%) had a C:D ratio of 0.7. A C:D ratio of 0.8 was observed in 1 (12.5%) case in Group-I and in 5 (62.5%) cases in Group-II. A C:D ratio of 0.9 was seen in 3 (37.5%) cases in Group-I and in 2 (25%) cases in Group-II. The vertical C:D ratio was higher compared to the horizontal C:D ratio [Table/Fig-4].

Comparison of demographic details and baseline characteristics of the patients between the groups.

VariablesGroupsTotalp-value
Group-IGroup-II
Age (in years)62.62±7.359.75±11.340.55
GenderMale6 (75%)5 (62.4%)110.99MC
Female2 (25%)3 (37.5%)5
Eye involvedRight4 (50%)6 (75%)100.99MC
Left4 (50%)2 (25%)6
Angle grading36 (75%)7 (87.5%)130.99MC
42 (25%)1 (12.5%)3
Visual fields23 (37.5%)3 (37.5%)60.99MC
35 (62.5%)4 (50%)9
NR0 (0)1 (12.5%)1
C:D ratio0.74 (50%)1 (12.5%)50.99MC
0.81 (12.5%)5 (62.5%)6
0.93 (37.5%)2 (25%)5
BCVA<6/601 (12.5%)2 (25%)30.99MC
>6/607 (87.5%)6 (75%)13
Previous treatment historyPrevious antiglaucoma medications2 (25%)1 (12.5%)30.99MC
Newlydiagnosed6 (75%)7 (87.5%)13

*IOP: Intraocular pressure; CT: Conventional trabeculectomy; MT: Microtrabeculectomy; POAG: Primary open angle glaucoma; NR: Non recordable; MC: McNemar’s test


The comparison of IOP within the groups is illustrated in [Table/Fig-5]. The IOP within the CT group was significantly different between preoperative and postoperative follow-ups (p<0.00001). Similarly, the IOP within the Microtrabeculectomy (MT) group significantly decreased from preoperative IOP to postoperative follow-ups (p<0.00001). However, no significant difference in IOP was observed between the groups at both preoperative and postoperative follow-ups (p>0.05) [Table/Fig-6].

Preoperative and postoperative IOP within-group analysis over time.

VariablesTime pointsGroups
Conventional Trabeculectomy (CT)Microtrabeculectomy
Median (Range)Mean (SD)Median (Range)Mean (SD)
IOP (in mmHg)Preoperative27.5 (25.5, 31.25)30 (7.27)30.5 (25.75, 33.5)30.75 (6.04)
Postoperative week 112 (9.75, 14.5)12.25 (3.05)13 (10, 15)12.62 (2.72)
Postoperative week 613.5 (10.75, 16)13.5 (3.02)14 (10.75, 15.25)13.5 (2.97)
Postoperative month 314 (12, 16.25)14.12 (2.79)14 (11.75, 16)13.97 (2.79)
p-value<0.00001*-<0.00001*-

*IOP: Intraocular pressure; CT: Conventional trabeculectomy; MT: Microtrabeculectomy; *p-value statistically significant


Comparison of IOP at different timepoints between the groups.

Different time pointsGroupsp-value
Conventional Trabeculectomy (CT)Microtrabeculectomy
Median (range)Mean (SD)Median (Range)Mean (SD)
Preoperative IOP (in mmHg)27.5 (25.5, 31.25)30 (7.27)30.5 (25.75, 33.5)30.75 (6.04)0.63MU
Postoperative week 1 (in mmHg)12 (9.75, 14.5)12.25 (3.05)13 (13, 15)12.62 (2.72)0.78MU
Postoperative week 6 (in mmHg)13.5 (10.75, 16)13.5 (3.02)14 (10.75, 15.25)13.5 (2.97)0.99MU
Postoperative month 3 (in mmHg)14 (12, 16.25)14.25 (2.79)14 (11.75, 16)13.87 (2.79)0.87MU

*MU: Mann-Whitney U test; IOP: Intraocular pressure; CT: Conventional trabeculectomy; MT: Microtrabeculectomy


None of the patients met the criteria for failure. All the patients fulfilled the criteria for complete success (16 patients, 100%).

In Group-I, one patient experienced intraoperative subconjunctival bleeding and early postoperative hyphema. In Group-II, two patients had intraoperative subconjunctival bleeding and early postoperative hyphema.

Discussion

Trabeculectomy is accepted worldwide as the safest and most effective drainage procedure for glaucoma. Although medical treatment is effective, the cost, adherence to medical therapy and associated side-effects are problematic in developing countries. Therefore, an effective surgical procedure is needed that can slow down the mechanism of damage in the nerve fibre layer and the corresponding visual field dysfunction, while minimising complications. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of microtrabeculectomy and CT in cases diagnosed with POAG.

Most patients in the present study were between 61-70 years of age (mean age 61.18±9.33 years), indicating that age can be a factor contributing to the development of POAG. This aligns with a study conducted by Mudhol R and Bansal R in a similar demographic, which reported a mean age of 67.63±8.86 years [12]. The same finding was consistent with the studies by Kumar A and Gupta D (mean age 60.72±9.62 years) [13].

Out of the 16 patients in the current study, 5 (31.25%) were females and 11 (68.75%) were males, exhibiting a robust male predilection. Evidence suggests that female sex hormones might be protective of the optic nerve, explaining the male preference [14]. However, although females exhibit a marked propensity for PACG, the sex predilection in POAG remains controversial, with the Rotterdam study showing a male predilection and the Blue Mountains Eye study showing a female predilection [15,16].

The present study showed that most patients had an increase in the vertical C:D ratio (mean ratio 0.8±0.08) compared to the horizontal ratio. A higher value in the former is a risk factor for the progression of glaucomatous visual dysfunction [17]. This was mirrored by a study conducted by Kurysheva NI and Lepeshkina LV which stated that an increase in the C:D ratio by more than or equal to 0.2 is a risk factor for glaucoma [18].

Out of 16 patients, three experienced subconjunctival bleeding during the intraoperative period. Two of these three patients were on long-term antiglaucoma medications. Episcleral bleeding is commonly observed in patients who have been on antiglaucoma medications for an extended period [19]. Hyphema was also noted in these patients, which resolved spontaneously. No late complications were reported in either group during follow-up.

Controlling IOP is the only intervention that can delay the onset and slow the progression of glaucoma, making it a crucial parameter to measure. The present study demonstrated a substantial difference in preoperative and postoperative IOP for both groups, with Group-I exhibiting a mean percentage reduction of 53% at the end of the third postoperative month and Group-II showing a decrease of 52.2%. This difference was statistically significant for both groups (p<0.001). Rong SS et al., proposed a cut-off value of 13.5 mm Hg on the seventh day for predicting an 80.0% success rate in achieving an IOP of less than 15 mm Hg without medications at 18 months [20]. This finding was comparable to the study by Mudhol RR and Ray A, in which they performed a subtenon injection of low-dose mitomycin C and achieved an initial success rate of 53.55% [21]. This cut-off value was achieved by all cases in the present study.

The difference in postoperative IOP values at follow-ups and the difference in IOPs from the preoperative value between the groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05), indicating similar efficacy of both procedures. This suggests that microtrabeculectomy is equally effective as CT for treating POAG. Microtrabeculectomy has certain advantages over CT. Since it occupies a smaller surface area of the eye, there is enough space for a minimum of three micro trabeculectomies near the superior limbus in case of failure [13]. This is a beneficial characteristic when operating on patients who have previously undergone cataract surgery. Additionally, the smaller size of the surgical field decreases the risk of corneal astigmatism compared to the conventional method, leading to faster visual rehabilitation. Furthermore, microtrabeculectomy results in a shorter hospital stay and recovery [13].

Limitation(s)

The present study had limitations, including a smaller sample size, being a single-centre study and a shorter follow-up period. A large-scale study with an extended follow-up period will further strengthen the findings of the present research.

Conclusion(s)

Thus, microtrabeculectomy is a safe procedure that has similar efficacy to CT for reducing IOP while producing good filtering blebs with fewer complications.

*IOP: Intraocular pressure; CT: Conventional trabeculectomy; MT: Microtrabeculectomy; POAG: Primary open angle glaucoma; NR: Non recordable; MC: McNemar’s test*IOP: Intraocular pressure; CT: Conventional trabeculectomy; MT: Microtrabeculectomy; *p-value statistically significant*MU: Mann-Whitney U test; IOP: Intraocular pressure; CT: Conventional trabeculectomy; MT: Microtrabeculectomy

Author Declaration:

    Financial or Other Competing Interests: None

    Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes

    Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes

    For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

Plagiarism Checking Methods: [Jain H et al.]

    Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 23, 2024

    Manual Googling: Oct 30, 2024

    iThenticate Software: Dec 08, 2024 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY:

Author Origin

Emendations:

7

References

[1]Gabai A, Cimarosti R, Battistella C, Isola M, Lanzetta P, Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy versus nonpenetrating surgeries in open-angle glaucoma: A meta-analysis J Glaucoma 2019 28(9):823-33.10.1097/IJG.000000000000132331335555  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Allison K, Patel D, Alabi O, Epidemiology of glaucoma: The past, present, and predictions for the future Cureus 2020 12(11):e1168610.7759/cureus.11686  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[3]Khandelwal RR, Raje D, Khandelwal RR, Clinical profile and burden of primary glaucoma in rural camp patients attending a tertiary care center in India J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2019 7(2):55-60.10.4103/jcor.jcor_79_18  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, It is all about pressure J Clin Med 2022 11(13):364010.3390/jcm1113364035806926  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Lim R, The surgical management of glaucoma: A review Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022 50(2):213-31.10.1111/ceo.1402835037376  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Bar-David L, Blumenthal EZ, Evolution of glaucoma surgery in the last 25 years Rambam Maimonides Med J 2018 9(3):e002410.5041/RMMJ.1034530089089PMC6115476  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Demirok G, Kaderli A, Kaderli ST, Üney G, Yakin M, Ekşioğlu Ü, Factors affecting the early and mid-term success of needling for early failure of filtering bleb Indian J Ophthalmol 2021 69(2):296-300.10.4103/ijo.IJO_533_2033463577PMC7933892  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Vernon SA, Gorman C, Zambarakji HJ, Medium to long-term intraocular pressure control following small flap trabeculectomy (microtrabeculectomy) in relatively low risk eyes Br J Ophthalmol 1998 82(12):1383-86.10.1136/bjo.82.12.13839930268PMC1722460  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Ang GS, Chan KC, Poostchi A, Nicholas S, Birchall W, Wakely L, Comparison of standard trabeculectomy versus microtrabeculectomy as a surgical treatment for glaucoma: A randomized clinical trial Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011 39(7):648-57.10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02534.x21631670  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Khan A, Majid O, Wani J, Zahoor S, Comparison of long-term intraocular pressure control following small flap vs conventional trabeculectomy Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014 3(7):797-99.10.5455/ijmsph.2014.140420141  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Pantalon A, Feraru C, Tarcoveanu F, Chiselita D, Success of primary trabeculectomy in advanced open angle glaucoma Clin Ophthalmol 2021 15:2219-29.10.2147/OPTH.S30822834079219PMC8166817  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Mudhol R, Bansal R, Cross-linked hyaluronic acid viscoelastic scleral implant in trabeculectomy Indian J Ophthalmol 2021 69(5):1135-41.10.4103/ijo.IJO_2462_2033913846PMC8186654  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Kumar A, Gupta D, Microtrabeculectomy versus conventional trabeculectomy in primary open angle glaucoma- A comparative study Paripex Indian Journal of Research 2019 8(2):60-63.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Korpole NR, Kurada P, Korpole MR, Gender difference in ocular diseases, risk factors and management with specific reference to role of sex steroid hormones J Midlife Health 2022 13(1):20-25.10.4103/jmh.jmh_28_2235707312PMC9190954  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT, The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in the Netherlands. The Rotterdam study Ophthalmology 1994 101(11):1851-55.10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31090-67800368  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR, Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia: The blue mountains eye study Ophthalmology 1996 103(10):1661-69.10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30449-18874440  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Kim YW, Yun YI, Choi HJ, Screening fundus photography predicts and reveals risk factors for glaucoma conversion in eyes with large optic disc cupping Scientific Reports 2023 13(1):8110.1038/s41598-022-26798-436596820PMC9810728  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Kurysheva NI, Lepeshkina LV, Detection of primary angle closure glaucoma progression by optical coherence tomography J Glaucoma 2021 30(5):410-20.10.1097/IJG.000000000000182933710065  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Inoue K, Managing adverse effects of glaucoma medications Clin Ophthalmol 2014 8:903-13.10.2147/OPTH.S4470824872675PMC4025938  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Rong SS, Feng MY, Wang N, Meng H, Thomas R, Fan S, Can early postoperative intraocular pressure predict success following mitomycin-C augmented trabeculectomy in primary angle-closure glaucoma Eye 2013 27(3):403-09.10.1038/eye.2012.29123306726PMC3597889  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Mudhol RR, Ray A, Efficacy and safety of the subtenon injection of 0.01% mitomycin c-augmented trabeculectomy Cureus 2024 16(6):e6211910.7759/cureus.62119  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]