JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dermatology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2024/72976.20264
Year : 2024 | Month : Nov | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : WC06 - WC10

Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Self-reporting Men Who have Sex with Men: A Cross-sectional Study from Chennai, India

R Sowmiya1, BT Priya2, Ragini Rajan3, V Anandan4, Ramya Selvaraj5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
4 Professor, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
5 Postgraduate Student, Department of Dermatology, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. BT Priya, A2B, Aishwaryam Apartments, Barakka Road, Secretrait Colony, Kilpauk, Chennai-600010, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: priyachiran@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) are at high-risk for acquiring Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). The high prevalence of STIs, such as syphilis, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), genital herpes, genital warts, gonorrhea, and hepatitis B, necessitates regular screening in the MSM group. Furthermore, the presence of these STIs increases the transmission of HIV. Unfortunately, limited data are available regarding STI prevalence among MSM in India. Understanding the prevalence in this high-risk group aids in rapid diagnosis and effective control of infections, thereby reducing their transmission.

Aim

To analyse the prevalence of STIs in the MSM group in Venereology Outpatient Department (OPD) in a Tertiary care centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Materials and Methods

A record-based cross-divtional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India over a period of one year (January 2023 - December 2023). The study included 110 men who were brought in by voluntary organisations or who walked in directly to the Venereology department and identified themselves as homosexuals. Their socio-demographic data, detailed contact history, chief complaints, relevant investigations, and treatments provided were recorded and analysed. All data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results

Out of the 110 men enrolled in this study, most were in the 18 to 29 years age group, and a predominant 58 (52.72%) reported engaging in unprotected sexual practices. Specifically, 67 (60.91%) of the men identified themselves as strictly homosexuals, while 43 (39.1%) identified as bisexuals. Further inquiry about their partners revealed that 24 (21.82%) had contact with known partners, while 86 (78.18%) had contact with unknown partners, primarily through dating apps and social media platforms. Among the 42 patients diagnosed with STIs, syphilis was the most common, affecting 15 (13.63%) individuals. The divond most common STI was HIV, seen in 10 (9.09%) of which 4 had co-infection with syphilis. The next most common STIs diagnosed were genital herpes in 7 (6.36%), gonorrhea in 6 (5.45%), genital warts in 3 (2.73%), hepatitis B in 3 (2.73%), and genital scabies in 2 (1.81%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of STIs in this study was found to be 38.18%. This study underscores the importance of understanding the prevalence of STIs, which may aid in targeted interventions to address STI transmission, particularly among young adults and MSM populations. Efforts should focus on promoting safer sexual practices, increasing access to testing and treatment, and providing education and support to both individuals and their partners.

Keywords

Homosexuals,Sexually transmitted disease,Syphilis

Introduction

Homosexuality can be described as the behaviour of a person whose sexual desire is predominantly directed towards members of the same sex or who primarily engages in sexual activity with persons of the same sex [1]. MSM fall under this broader category of homosexuality. The changing societal attitudes towards sexuality and increasing acceptance have led to a noticeable rise in the number of MSM who come out and express their sexual orientation [2]. Social media and dating apps play a significant role in facilitating discreet connections among MSM [3].

MSM populations are at a higher risk of transmitting STIs and HIV infections compared to heterosexual individuals, as they often engage in high-risk sexual practices [4-6]. It is crucial to study the prevalence of STIs in this high-risk group. Limited data are currently available regarding STI prevalence among MSM in India, as noted in studies by Setia MS et al., Aggarwal P et al., and Pravitha BP et al., [5,7,8]. Understanding the prevalence of STIs in this high-risk group is essential for rapid diagnosis and effective control of infections, thereby reducing transmission [7].

The purpose of this study was to analyse the prevalence of STIs among the MSM group, which may help in understanding the factors contributing to the rise of STIs and in developing effective control measures to prevent further transmission. Ultimately, this can lead to a decrease in the overall prevalence of STIs in the community.

Materials and Methods

This was a record-based cross-sectional study conducted on men who either walked in directly or were brought in by voluntary organisations and identified themselves as homosexuals at the Venereology OPD of a tertiary care centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. This study was conducted in January 2024, and the records from January 2023 to December 2023 were reviewed, covering a 12-month period. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee (ECR/131/Inst/TN/2013/RR-22).

Inclusion criteria: Men above 18 years old who have sex with men and attend the Venereology OPD, whether as direct walk-ins or brought in by voluntary organisations for screening or with genital lesions, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Men under 18-year-old and heterosexuals were excluded from the study.

Sample size: Sample size was calculated based on a similar study by Aggarwal P et al., India [7].

Z=1.96 (statistical significant constant for 95% CI)

P=7%, q=100-p=93, L=absolute error=5%

Therefore, by using the above formula and 10% non-response rate, the calculated sample size was 110.

Study Procedure

The male patients who sought care at the skin and venereal diseases OPD and reported being involved in sexual relationships with other males were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The following data were collected: demographic information regarding sexual orientation, age, marital status, educational status, present occupation, and details of their contacts. Subsequently, detailed information regarding sexual practices was obtained. This was followed by documenting the clinical history and examination findings.

All patients were screened for syphilis, HIV, and Hepatitis B. Screening for syphilis was conducted using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) test, and those who tested reactive for RPR were confirmed with the Treponema pallidum Hemagglutination Assay (TPHA) using a card test. Additional laboratory investigations were performed in accordance with the patients’ symptoms. For patients presenting with genital ulcers and discharge, smears were taken for dark field microscopy, Tzanck smear, Gram stain, and Giemsa stain. All patients were referred to the Integrated Counselling and Testing Centre (ICTC) for voluntary counselling and testing for HIV.

Statistical Analysis

The data were presented as frequencies and percentages. All analyses were conducted using SPSS software 21.0.

Results

In this study, over one year, a total of 110 patients who self-reported to the venereology OPD and identified themselves as MSM were enrolled. The prevalence of STIs in this study was found to be 42 (38.18%). Analysing the socio-demographic data, as depicted in [Table/Fig-1], the most common age group ranged from 18 to 29 years. Out of the 110 patients, 34 (30.91%) were uneducated, while the remaining were educated, which included 32 (29.09%) graduates and 4 (3.64%) postgraduates. Additionally, 23 (20.91%) MSMs were Commercial Sex Workers (CSWs), and 21 (19.09%) MSM patients were married, thereby posing an increased risk of transmission of infection to their female partners.

Socio-demographic data of MSM patients.

Socio-demographic datan (%)
Age group (years)
18-2961 (55.45)
30-3932 (29.09)
40-4916 (14.55)
>501 (0.91)
Education
Uneducated34 (30.91)
Till primary school31 (28.18)
Till higher secondary9 (8.18)
Graduate32 (29.09)
Postgraduate4 (3.64)
Marital status
Married21 (19.09)
Unmarried89 (80.91)
Occupation
Student6 (5.45)
Daily wages25 (22.73)
Self employed17 (15.45)
Professional30 (27.27)
Unemployed9 (8.18)
CSW23 (20.91)

Among the 110 patients, 74 (67.27%) were brought in by voluntary organisations for screening, while the other 36 (32.73%) patients were direct walk-ins. The most common genital complaint was a genital ulcer, seen in 13 (11.82%) patients, followed by a maculopapular rash on the palms and soles in 7 (6.36%) and urethral discharge in 6 (5.45%) [Table/Fig-2]. Four (3.64%) patients who were asymptomatic at the time of presentation were found to have a sexually transmitted disease upon further laboratory investigation.

Symptoms for presentation to venereology OPD.

Symptomsn (%)
Genital ulcer13 (11.82)
Urethral discharge6 (5.45)
Growth in genitalia4 (3.64)
Maculopapular rash7 (6.36)
Itchy papules over genitalia3 (2.73)
Asymptomatic (screening)77 (70.00)

[Table/Fig-3] illustrates the sexual practices among MSM patients. Sixty-seven (60.91%) men identified as strictly homosexual, while 43 (39.09%) identified as bisexual, although they predominantly preferred male partners. Fifty-seven (51.82%) men were ano-insertive in practice, and 58 (52.72%) reported having unprotected intercourse. Eighty-six (78.18%) men had contact with unknown partners.

Sexual practices in MSM patients.

n (%)
Sexual orientation
Strictly homosexual67 (60.91)
Bisexual43 (39.09)
Details of contact
Known partners24 (21.82)
Unknown partners86 (78.18)
Sexual practice
Insertive57 (51.82)
Receptive40 (36.36)
Both13 (11.82)
Usage of condoms
Protected17 (15.45)
Unprotected58 (52.72)
Irregular use35 (31.82)
Presenting to STD OPD
Direct walk-in36 (32.73)
Through voluntary organisation74 (67.27)

[Table/Fig-4] depicts the most common STDs in the MSM group. The most prevalent STD was found to be syphilis, seen in 15 (13.63%) patients, followed by HIV in 10 (9.09%) patients (among whom six had only HIV and four had a co-infection of HIV and syphilis). The next most common infections were genital herpes in 7 (6.36%), gonorrhea in 6 (5.45%), genital warts in 3 (2.73%), hepatitis B in 3 (2.73%), and genital scabies in 2 (1.81%). All others who came for screening were found to be free of STDs.

Result of the study.

S. No.Diseasen (%)
1.Syphilis15 (13.63)
Primary5 (4.54)
Secondary4 (3.63)
Latent6 (5.45)
2.HIV6 (9.09)
Newly diagnosed3 (2.72)
Already on ART7 (6.36)
HIV with secondary syphilis3 (2.72)
HIV with latent syphilis1 (0.90)
3.Genital Herpes7 (6.36)
4.Gonorrhea6 (5.45)
5.Genital wart3 (2.73)
6.Hepatitis B3 (2.73)
7.Genital scabies2 (1.81)

Discussion

In this study, the prevalence of STIs among MSM was found to be 38.18%. A recent study on the MSM population in Kerala by Pravitha BP et al., (2015-2020) also noted a prevalence of STIs among MSM at 46.30% [8]. Studying prevalence is crucial for public health efforts aimed at preventing the transmission of STIs and HIV.

High rates of partner turnover, high-risk sexual practices, and inconsistent condom use contribute to the increased transmission of STIs and HIV among these men. Additional factors, such as stigma associated with this population, discrimination, and barriers to accessing healthcare, further increase the risk [7]. MSM are at greater health risk than heterosexual men not only because of promiscuity but also due to the nature of sexual practices among men. Anal intercourse is relatively common among MSM, and the rectum differs significantly from the vagina. The vagina has stratified squamous epithelium with secretions that help with lubrication during sexual intercourse, allowing it to endure friction without damage and resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm [9]. In contrast, the rectum and anal canal consist of delicate muscles that cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, leading to trauma, damage to the anal sphincter, anal tears, and fecal incontinence [10]. All of these factors expose both participants to blood and organisms in feces, resulting in infection, inflammation, and enhanced susceptibility to STIs. The fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, makes anogenital intercourse a particularly efficient means of HIV transmission [11].

In this study, the most common age group of MSM was 18 to 29 years, which was comparable to the findings of Aggarwal P et al., where the common age group ranged from 20 to 29 years [7], and Setia MS et al., where the common age group ranged from 18.5 to 28.7 years [5]. Similarly, in Pravitha BP et al., study a majority of patients were in the age group of 20 to 30 years (47.3%) [8].

In this study, 29.09% of MSM were graduates, and 3.64% were post-graduates. In Aggarwal P et al., 17.31% and 3.85% were graduates and postgraduates, respectively [7]. In this study, 15.45% were self-employed, and 27.27% were professionals. Similar findings were noted in Pravitha BP et al., study, where most patients (82.4%) among MSM were semiprofessional workers [8]. Unlike the studies conducted by Setia MS et al., Aggarwal P et al., and Pravitha BP et al., this study noted that 20.90% of MSM were CSWs [5,7,8].

In this study, 19.09% of MSM patients were married. This findingwas similar to that of Aggarwal P et al., where 34.62% were married [7], and Setia MS et al., which noted that 22% of MSM were married [5]. Pravitha BP et al., study found that 41.9% of MSM were married [8]. These MSM, who are married to women, often feel obligated to have intercourse with their wives to fulfil societal expectations of having children, thereby increasing the risk of STI transmission to females. In this study, strict MSM accounted for more (60.91%) than bisexual MSM, which was contrary to the findings of Aggarwal P et al., where bisexual individuals comprised a greater percentage (63.46%) than strict homosexuals [7]. These bisexual individuals serve as a bridge population for STI transmission [3]. Therefore, it is crucial to trace, treat, and follow-up with married and bisexual MSM due to their significant role in the spread of STIs.

Additionally, 67.27% of MSM were brought in by voluntary organisations for screening, while 3.63% of MSM who were initially asymptomatic later received an STI diagnosis. This underscores the importance of screening. Voluntary organisations also play a vital role in tracing MSM individuals, creating awareness among them regarding STI risks, motivating them for regular screenings, and counseling them on the proper use of condoms. Through regular screening, STIs can be diagnosed at an early stage, allowing for appropriate treatment to be initiated and thereby preventing complications.

In previous studies by Setia MS et al., and Brahmam GN et al., genital herpes was found to be the most common STI among MSM [5,12]. In the study, conducted by Aggarwal P et al., genital warts were the most common STI, occurring in 23.08% of cases, followed by HIV in 23.08% and syphilis in 21.15% [7]. Viral STIs were found to be more common in these studies. In contrast, the study by Pravitha BP et al., found that syphilis was the most common STI, present in 64.9% of cases, followed by genital warts in 36.5% and HIV in 14.9% [8]. Similarly, in this study, syphilis was the most common STI, found in 13.63% of MSM, followed by HIV in 9.09%. This changing trend from viral STIs to bacterial STIs has been observed after the year 2015 and continues to the present [8,13,14].

In this study, HIV co-infection with syphilis was found in 3.63% of patients. Similar findings were noted in other Indian studies, such as the study by Pravitha BP et al., [8], where HIV co-infection with syphilis was reported in 8.1% of patients and in the study by Aggarwal P et al., where the HIV-syphilis co-infection was reported in 5.77% of patients [7]. This HIV co-infection with syphilis could enhance HIV replication by increasing the activation of the immune system and causing cytokine alterations. This co-infection negatively impacts immune recovery and the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy [15,16]. A comparison of data with similar studies has been presented in [Table/Fig-5] [4,5,7,8,17-22].

Comparison of data with similar studies on Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) in MSM [4,5,7,8,17-22].

S. No.Name and year of studyPlace of studyNo. of subjectsPrevalence of STI (in %)Most common STI
1.Pravitha BP et al., [8] (2015-2020)Kerala7446.30Syphilis
2.Aggarwal P et al., [7] (2013-2014)New Delhi527.05Genital wart
3.Setia MS et al., [5] (2006)Mumbai15058.26Genital Herpes
4.Garg T et al., [4] (2004-2010)Delhi7510.15Syphilis
5.Go VF et al., [17] (2004)Chennai465.90HIV
6.Mwaniki SW [18] (2021)Kenya24831.99Chlamydia
7.Ye ZH et al., [19] (2020)China17723.70Human Papilloma virus
8.Hart TA et al., [20] (2017-2019)Canada244956.80HIV
Montreal117945.10Syphilis
Toronto51757.59HIV
Vancouver75349.09HIV
9.Hakim AJ et al., [21] (2016-2017)Papua New Guinea Port Moresby40027.00Chlamydia
Lae35232.30Chlamydia
Mt Hagen11127.60Chlamydia
10.Fournet N [22] (2006-2012)Netherland218320.60Chlamydia
11.Present study Jan-Dec 2023Chennai11038.18Syphilis

In this study, it was noted that a significant number of individuals (78.18%) had contact with unknown male partners, making contact tracing very difficult and resulting in the spread of STIs to other MSM. To address this issue, social media platforms can be utilised to create awareness among MSM [23].

Some suggested strategies to decrease the prevalence of STIs in this high-risk group include increasing awareness about the signs and symptoms of STIs before entering dating apps. This knowledge helps individuals recognise early symptoms and seek treatment promptly, thereby reducing the likelihood of transmission to partners. While using dating apps, it is essential to emphasise the importance of using protection (condoms) during sexual activity. Lastly, better coordination between physicians and voluntary organisations for field-level tracing of MSM groups and their contacts will ensure that MSM individuals undergo regular screening, early diagnosis, and treatment, ultimately decreasing the prevalence of STIs.

Limitation(s)

As this is a record-based study, retrieving detailed histories was challenging. More information regarding the contacts could not be obtained. Additionally, no comparison was made between STIs among MSM and STIs among heterosexual men.

Conclusion(s)

The MSM is a high-risk group due to the high prevalence of STIs among them. In this study, the prevalence of STIs was found to be 38.18%, with syphilis being the most common STI, affecting 13.63% of the subjects. As the prevalence of syphilis and HIV among this vulnerable group continues to rise, it is crucial to create awareness about STI risks and encourage regular screening to facilitate early diagnosis and prompt treatment. Since a significant portion of the MSM population is young and educated, combining traditional outreach and educational approaches with digital interventions will be a powerful strategy for maximising healthcare initiatives within the MSM community.

Author Declaration:

    Financial or Other Competing Interests: None

    Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes

    Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes

    For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

Plagiarism Checking Methods: [Jain H et al.]

    Plagiarism X-checker: May 19, 2024

    Manual Googling: Jun 15, 2024

    iThenticate Software: Oct 07, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY:

Author Origin

Emendations:

8

References

[1]Rao TS, Jacob KS, Homosexuality and India Indian J Psychiatry 2012 54(1):01-03.10.4103/0019-5545.9463622556428  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Biswas M, Socio-economically convenient ‘coming-out’ decision of India’s lesbian, gay, bisexual community Int J Res Cult Soc 2018 2(2):324  [Google Scholar]

[3]Unyapipat C, In-iw S, Manaboriboon B, Influence of online dating apps on sexual risk adolescents and youths in Thailand: An online cross-sectional survey Siriraj Med J 2023 75(9):612-21.10.33192/smj.v75i9.264171  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Garg T, Chander R, Jain A, Barara M, Sexually transmitted diseases among men who have sex with men: A retrospective analysis from Suraksha clinic in tertiary care hospital, India J Sex Transm Dis 2012 33:16-19.10.4103/0253-7184.9380622529448  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Setia MS, Lindan C, Jerajani HR, Kumta S, Ekstrand M, Mathur M, Men who have sex with men and transgenders in Mumbai, India: An emerging risk group for STIs and HIV Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006 72:425-57.10.4103/0378-6323.2933817179617  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Saha MK, Mahapatra T, Biswas S, Ghosh P, Mahapatra S, Deb AK, Sociobehavioural correlates of HIV risk among men who have sex with men in Chhattisgarh, India: Analysis of sentinel surveillance data Jpn J Infect Dis 2015 68:38-44.10.7883/yoken.JJID.2013.06825420644  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Aggarwal P, Bhattar S, Sahani SK, Bhalla P, Garg VK, Sexually transmitted infections and HIV in self-reporting men who have sex with men: A two-year study from India J Infect Public Health 2016 9:564-70.10.1016/j.jiph.2015.12.00726776704  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Pravitha BP, Prathap P, Asokan N, Sudhiraj TS, The profile of sexually transmitted infections of men who have sex with men: A tertiary care centre-based comparative cross-sectional study Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS 2023 44(2):128-131.10.4103/ijstd.ijstd_14_2138223149  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Jenness SM, Begier EM, Neagius A, Murrill CS, Wendal T, Hagen H, Unprotected anal intercourse and sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk heterosexual women Am J Public Health 2011 101(4):745-50.10.2105/AJPH.2009.18188320558790  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Hladik F, McElrath MJ, Setting the stage: Host invasion by HIV Nat Rev Immunol 2008 8:447-57.10.1038/nri230218469831  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Haase AT, Targeting early infection to prevent HIV-1 mucosal transmission Nature 2010 464:217-23.10.1038/nature0875720220840  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Brahmam GN, Kodavalla V, Rajkumar H, Rachakulla HK, Kallam S, Myakala SP, Sexual practices, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections among self-identified men who have sex with men in four high HIV prevalence states of India AIDS 2008 22(Suppl 5):S45-57.10.1097/01.aids.0000343763.54831.1519098479  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Shah BJ, Karia DR, Pawara CL, Syphilis: Is it making a resurgence? Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS 2015 36(2):178-81.10.4103/2589-0557.16717026692612  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Kamat S, Vaghasia A, Dharmender J, Kansara KG, Shah BJ, Syphilis: Is it back with a bang? Indian Dermatol Online J 2024 15(1):73-77.10.4103/idoj.idoj_187_2338283002  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Ren M, Dashwood T, Walmsley S, The intersection of HIV and syphilis: Update on the key considerations in testing and management Curr HIV AIDS Rep 2021 18:280-88.10.1007/s11904-021-00564-z34091858  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Fan L, Yu A, Zhang D, Wang Z, Ma P, Consequence of HIV/syphilis co-infection on HIV viral load and immune response to antiretroviral therapy Infect Drug Resist 2021 14:2851-62.10.2147/IDR.S32064834335031  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Go VF, Srikrishnan AK, Sivaram S, Murugavel GK, Galai N, Johnson SC, High HIV prevalence and risk behavior in men who have sex with men in Chennai, India J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004 35:314-19.10.1097/00126334-200403010-0001415076248  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Mwaniki SW, Kaberia PM, Mugo PM, Palanee-Phillips T, Prevalence of five curable sexually transmitted infections and associated risk factors among tertiary student men who have sex with men in Nairobi, Kenya: A respondent-driven sampling survey Sex Health 2023 20(2):105-17.10.1071/SH2211437071576  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Ye ZH, Chen S, Liu F, Cui ST, Liu ZZ, Jiang YJ, Patterns of sexually transmitted co-infections and associated factors among men who have sex with men: A cross-sectional study in Shenyang, China Public Health 2022 10:84264410.3389/fpubh.2022.84264435712312  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Hart TA, Moore DM, Noor SW, Lachowsky N, Grace D, Cox J, Prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections, and related preventive and risk behaviours, among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver: Results from the Engage Study Can J Public Health 2021 112(6):1020-29.10.17269/s41997-021-00546-z34142353  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Hakim AJ, Iwamoto C, Badman SG, Willie B, Pekon S, Aeno H, High prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea and the need for sexually transmitted infection testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Papua New Guinea Sex Transm Dis 2021 48(2):109-17.10.1097/OLQ.000000000000130032976356  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Fournet N, Koedijk FDH, van Leeuwen AP, van Rooijen MS, van der Sande MA, van Veen MG, Young male sex workers are at high-risk for sexually transmitted infections: A cross-sectional study from Dutch STI clinics, the Netherlands, 2006-2012 BMC Infect Dis 2016 16:6310.1186/s12879-016-1388-326847196  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Zou H, Fan S, Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Sex Behav 2017 46(4):885-94.Epub 201610.1007/s10508-016-0709-327043837  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]