JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73038.19872
Year : 2024 | Month : Sep | Volume : 18 | Issue : 09 PDF Full Version Page : QC05 - QC07

Clinicopathological Analysis of Adnexal Masses Presenting in a Tertiary Healthcare Centre, Karnataka, India: A Retrospective Observational Study

Sanjana K Murthy1, Kala Katti2, Ramya Karanam3

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
2 Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Sanjana K Murthy, #3419/74, 6th Cross, Gayathrinagar, Bangalore-560021, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: sanjanak2196@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The ovaries, fallopian tubes, and the broad ligament make up the anatomical adnexa. Adnexal masses represent a commonly occurring issue in gynaecology. The majority of ovarian malignancies are detected at advanced stages. The clinical manifestations of adnexal masses vary, with many cancers either showing no symptoms or presenting with vague signs. In the reproductive age group, the most typical manifestation is a benign functional cyst.

Aim

To conduct a clinico-pathological analysis of adnexal masses among women presenting at a tertiary healthcare centre.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Akash Institute of Medical Science and Research Centre, Devanahalli, Karnataka, India, from November 2022 to April 2024. The diagnosis of adnexal mass was based on clinical symptoms, abdominal examination, bimanual examination, and trans-abdominal ultrasound. The CA-125 and other tumour markers were sent depending on the risk of malignancy. All tissues were sent for histopathological examination. The data were collected and tabulated in a Microsoft excel sheet, and percentages were calculated.

Results

This study included 38 cases, in which benign ovarian and para-ovarian cysts were the most common findings, observed in 21 cases (55.3%). There were six cases of benign serous cystadenoma (15.8%), three cases of teratoma (7.9%), two cases of high-grade serous carcinoma (5.3%), one case of germ cell tumour (2.6%), one case of mucinous cystadenoma (2.6%), two cases of endometriotic cysts (5.3%), one case of adnexal cystic degeneration of a fibroid (2.6%), and one rare case of primary fallopian tube carcinoma (2.6%). The most common presenting complaint was abdominal pain, reported in 21 cases (55.3%).

Conclusion

Adnexal masses can present in a variety of forms, ranging from benign cysts to infections and cancers. A thorough history and clinical examination are essential for accurate diagnosis. Investigations support the diagnosis, and histology confirms it.

Keywords

Benign, Clinical presentation, Histopathology, Malignant, Ovarian tumours

Introduction

The word “adnexa” is derived from the Latin word “adnexus,” meaning “appendage.” The anatomical adnexa comprise the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and the broad ligament [1,2]. Ovarian cancer ranks seventh in terms of cancer-related mortality among women and is one of the most common causes of death from gynaecological malignancies [3,4]. Adnexal masses represent a frequently occurring issue in gynaecology [5,6]. Of all gynaecological malignancies, malignant epithelial ovarian tumours are associated with the highest fatality rate [7]. An early diagnosis can result in a 90% five-year survival rate [8].

The clinical manifestations of adnexal masses vary. Most cancers either show no symptoms at all or present vague symptoms such as abdominal distension, lower abdominal pressure, abdominal pain or discomfort, and gastrointestinal or urinary disturbances. Abnormal vaginal bleeding may occur if the tumour is hormonally active [5,9].

In the reproductive age group, the most typical manifestation is a benign functional cyst. Other benign lesions include hydrosalpinx, ectopic pregnancy, tubo-ovarian abscess, endometriotic cyst, and hydatidiform mole. Benign masses may also include pedunculated fibroids, teratomas, para-ovarian cysts, and serous and mucinous cysts. Malignant masses include ovarian, fallopian tube, and gastrointestinal cancers. Epithelial, stromal, and sex cord tumours are the most common types of tumours found in post-menopausal women. Inflammatory factors in the reproductive age group are the main cause of masses involving the fallopian tubes. Pelvic inflammatory disease may be associated with the presence of a tubo-ovarian abscess [9].

This study aimed to conduct a clinicopathological analysis of adnexal masses among women presenting at a tertiary healthcare centre.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Akash Institute of Medical Science and Research Centre, Devanahalli, Karnataka, India from November 2022 to April 2024.

Inclusion criteria: All patients who underwent surgery for adnexal masses during the study period at our centre were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with asymptomatic simple ovarian cysts ≤6 cm were excluded.

Study Procedure

The diagnosis of adnexal masses was based on clinical symptoms, per abdominal and bimanual examinations, and trans-abdominal ultrasound. The CA-125 and other tumour markers (AFP, HCG, LDH) were sent depending on the risk of malignancy. Indications for surgery included large masses >6 cm, masses with symptoms, malignant tumours, and patients presenting with acute ovarian torsion. Demographic details of patients, such as age, parity, and menopausal status, were noted. Presenting symptoms were documented, including abdominal pain, abdominal mass, post-menopausal bleeding, weight loss, loss of appetite, and cases presenting with acute ovarian torsion. For all operated cases, routine pre-operative investigations and pre-anaesthetic check-ups were conducted. All tissues were sent for histopathological examination, and the histopathological diagnosis was documented.

Statistical Analysis

The data was collected and tabulated in a Microsoft excel sheet, and the frequencies and percentages were calculated for analysis.

Results

A total of 38 cases were operated on during the study period. The ages of the patients ranged from 13 to 70 years, with three patients being less than 19 years old, 12 patients belonging to the age category of 20-29 years, 13 patients in the 30-39 year age range, four patients aged 40-49 years, and six patients over 50 years of age. In total, 31 patients were pre-menopausal, and seven patients were post-menopausal [Table/Fig-1].

Demographic details of women with adnexal masses (n=38).

Total (%) (n=38)No. of benign cases (%) (n=34)No. of malignant cases (%) (n=4)
Age in years
<193 (8%)3 (9%)Nil
20-2912 (31%)11 (32%)1 (25%)
30-3913 (34%)13 (38%)Nil
40-494 (10%)3 (9%)1 (25%)
>506 (17%)4 (12%)2 (50%)
BMI in kg/m2
<18.59 (23%)6 (18%)3 (75%)
18.5-24.913 (34%)13 (38%)Nil
25-29.911 (30%)11 (32%)Nil
>30.05 (13%)4 (12%01 (25%)
Parity
Nullipara8 (21%)7 (20.5%)1 (25%)
Primipara7 (18%)7 (20.5%)Nil
Multipara23 (61%)20 (59%)3 (75%)
Menopausal status
Pre-menopausal31 (82%)29 (85%)2 (50%)
Post-menopausal7 (18%)5 (15%)2 (50%)

There were 34 benign cases (89%) and four malignant cases (11%). These cases were classified according to age group, with 11 patients in the 20-29 year age category being benign cases and one being a malignant case (germ cell tumour) [Table/Fig-1].

Out of the 38 cases analysed, benign ovarian and para-ovarian cysts were the most common findings, seen in 21 cases (55.3%) [Table/Fig-2]. The most common presenting complaint was abdominal pain, reported in 21 cases (55.3%) [Table/Fig-3].

Frequency of type of adnexal mass among women (n=38).

Type of adnexal massNo. of casesPercentage
Simple ovarian cyst/Benign ovarian cyst1642.1%
Paraovarian cyst513.2%
Benign serous cystadenoma615.8%
Mucinous cystadenoma12.6%
Teratoma37.9%
High-grade serous carcinoma25.3%
Mixed germ cell tumour12.6%
Cystic degeneration of fibroid12.6%
Serous intraepithelial Carcinoma of B/l fallopian tube12.6%
Endometriotic cyst25.3%

Clinical presentation of the study participants (n=38).

PresentationNo. of cases (%)
Asymptomatic4 (10.5%)
Abdominal pain21 (55.3%)
Abdominal mass6 (15.8%)
Postmenopausal bleeding2 (5.3%)
Weight loss4 (10.5%)
Loss of appetite4 (10.5%)
Acute ovarian torsion5 (13.2%)

For most of the simple ovarian cysts, ultrasound reports indicated simple unilocular ovarian cysts. The mature teratoma on ultrasound showed heterogeneous solid cystic hyperechoic lesion. Cystic degeneration of a fibroid on ultrasound showed mixed echogenicity of ovarian origin. A case of fallopian tube carcinoma on ultrasound demonstrated normal adnexa with a bulky uterus.

The CA-125 was measured for 23 cases with suspicion of malignancy. For all the benign ovarian tumours (19 cases), the value was <35 U/mL. For three cases of ovarian malignancy, the CA-125 values were >35 U/mL. In the case of fallopian tube carcinoma, the CA-125 value was 103.5 U/mL. Among the patients with benign ovarian tumours, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic cystectomy, eight patients underwent open cystectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH with BSO) was performed on 10 patients. For all four malignant cases, staging laparotomy was performed.

Discussion

According to studies, ovarian cancer ranks third among female cancer sites in the majority of India’s population-based cancer registries, following breast and cervical cancer [10,11]. This study encompasses the highest number of patients, with 29 (76.3%) in the age category of 20 to 49 years. This finding is consistent with research conducted by Rai R et al., (78.7%), Khandelwal S et al., (84.42%), and Badkur P and Gupta K (78.93%), which indicated that patients were primarily in the 20-49 age range [9,12,13].

In the current study, most benign tumours (70.6%) were observed in the age group of 20-39 years, while most malignant tumours were seen in the menopausal age group (75%). However, in this study, benign tumours (89.5%) were higher than those reported by Deshmukh V et al., (30%) and Garg R and Suboohi A, (56%), but similar to studies conducted in Karnataka by Divya KP et al., (76%) and Radhamani S (90.46%) [11,14-16].

Additionally, another finding corroborated by the present study showed that among the four malignant patients, two (50%) were older than 50, one (25%) was in the age group of 40-49 years, and one (25%) was younger, representing the age group of 20 to 29 years. Given that there is a 1-1.5 percent lifetime risk of ovarian carcinoma, it is advised that women over 50 should be examined for ovarian malignancy when they present with suggestive symptoms [5]. Malignancy is more common in post-menopausal women. In this study, two of the four malignant patients were post-menopausal, while the remaining two were pre-menopausal. This finding aligns with studies by Khandelwal S et al., and Rai R et al., which reveals that postmenopausal individuals had malignant lesions in 55.5% and 47% of cases, respectively [9,12].

In this study, abdominal pain was the most common presentation, occurring in 55.3% of cases. A comparable incidence was reported by Khandelwal S et al., (63.8%), Bhagde AD et al., (92%), Hassan SA (58.2%), Champawat C and Wani RJ (79.5%), Manivasakan J and Arounassalame B (70.5%), and Neelgund S and Hiremath P (67.5%) [9,17-21]. An abdominal mass was detected in 15.8% of the patients in our study. However, contrary to our findings, Kim SI et al., observed that the most prevalent presenting symptoms were abdominal discomfort (66.92%) and abdominal mass (28.11%) [22]. Additionally, Deshmukh V et al., reported an abdominal mass in 37.5% of their patients [11].

According to the current study, the simple ovarian cyst (42.1%) was the most prevalent benign tumour, followed by serous cystadenoma (15.8%) and paraovarian cyst (13.2%). However, present findings did not correlate with results reported by Das MJ et al., and Kanthikar SN et al., who discovered that 41.89% and 35.71% of their subjects had serous cystadenoma, respectively [4,23]. Furthermore, Sharma I et al., found serous cystadenoma to be the most prevalent tumour (34%) [24].

As seen in this study, most ovarian tumours present with vague symptoms such as abdominal pain (55.3%), abdominal mass (15.8%), weight loss (10.5%), and loss of appetite (10.5%) in both benign and malignant cases. Therefore, it is essential to screen patients with these symptoms using ultrasound for early detection of ovarian tumours. Early detection can also change the treatment modality depending on the size and nature of the tumour, as most benign cases can be managed with laparoscopic procedures.

Limitation(s)

The study had a limited sample size, which may mean that the results do not accurately reflect the histological patterns and clinical symptoms of all women in India with adnexal masses; instead, they are specific to our region. Additionally, the retrospective study design poses an inherent limitation.

Conclusion(s)

Adnexal masses encompass a variety of forms, ranging from benign cysts to advanced carcinoma. These masses have a range of histopathological diagnosis that present clinically with vague and non-specific symptoms. They also exhibit a bimodal presentation with extremes of age. As a result, by the time most malignancies are diagnosed, they are often at an advanced stage. Therefore, prompt diagnosis of adnexal masses is crucial in determining the appropriate treatment modality, as most benign masses can be managed through minimally invasive procedures.

Author Declaration:

  • Financial or Other Competing Interests: None

  • Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes

  • Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes

  • For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

  • Plagiarism Checking Methods: [Jain H et al.]

  • Plagiarism X-checker: May 29, 2024

  • Manual Googling: Jun 20, 2024

  • iThenticate Software: Jul 20, 2024 (6%)

  • ETYMOLOGY:

    Author Origin

    Emendations:

    6

    References

    [1]Dutta DC, Textbook of Gynaecology, Anatomy of the female pelvic organs. In: Hiralal K, edrTextbook of Gynaecology 2008 5th ediCalcutta, IndiaNew Central Book Agency (P) Ltd  [Google Scholar]

    [2]Jeffcoate’s Principles of Gynaecology 2014 8th edition:490-527.  [Google Scholar]

    [3]Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A, Buskwofie A, Schorge JO, Adnexal mass in the postmenopausal patientClin Obstet Gynecol 2015 58(1):53-65.  [Google Scholar]

    [4]Das M, Yadav D, Sethi N, Sharma S, Khunteta N, Mohan A, Histopathological evaluation of ovarian carcinoma post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its correlation to disease outcome: A retrospective study of 30 casesIndian Journal of Gynaecologic Oncology 2023 21(4):79  [Google Scholar]

    [5]Berek JS, Berek & Novak’s Gynaecology 2012 15th edPhiladelphiaLippincott Williams & Wilkins  [Google Scholar]

    [6]American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – GynaecologyPractice bulletin no 174: Evaluation and management of adnexal massesObstet Gynaecol 2016 128(5):e210-26.  [Google Scholar]

    [7]Yazbek J, Helmy S, Ben-Nagi J, Holland T, Sawyer E, Jurkovic D, Value of preoperative ultrasound examination in the selection of women with adnexal masses for laparoscopic surgeryUltrasound Obstet Gynaecol 2007 30(6):883-88.  [Google Scholar]

    [8]Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Carcinoma of the ovaryInt J Gynaecol Obstet 2003 83(Suppl 1):135-66.10.1016/s0020-7292(03)90118-4  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

    [9]Khandelwal S, Pinkey L, Sangwan V, Rajiv M, Sunita S, Monika GB, A clinicopathological review of adnexal masses in a tertiary care centre of rural Haryana- A retrospective studyJ Evid Based Med Healthc 2021 8(30):2719-23.  [Google Scholar]

    [10]Saini SK, Shrivastava S, Singh Y, Dixit AK, Prasad SN, Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer, a single institution-based study in IndiaClin Cancer Investig J 2016 5:20-24.  [Google Scholar]

    [11]Deshmukh V, Suboohi A, Clinicopathological analysis of ovarian tumours: Experience of 3 years in a cancer hospitalThe New Indian Journal of OBGYN 2022 9(1):122-26.  [Google Scholar]

    [12]Rai R, Bhutia PC, Tshomo U, Clinicopathological profile of adnexal masses presenting to a tertiary-care hospital in BhutanSouth Asian J Cancer 2019 8(3):168-72.  [Google Scholar]

    [13]Badkur P, Gupta K, Clinico-pathological correlation of adnexal masses in a tertiary care centreMed Sci 2016 5(4):526-29.  [Google Scholar]

    [14]Garg R, Sing S, Rani R, Agrawal M, Rajvanshi R, A clinicopathological study of malignant ovarian tumours in IndiaJ South Asian Federation of Menopause Societies 2014 2(1):09-11.  [Google Scholar]

    [15]Divya KP, Prabhu S, Prasad SBS, Validity of International ovarian tumour analysis simple rules in characterization of ovarian massInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol 2023 12(7):2128-32.  [Google Scholar]

    [16]Radhamani S, Akhila MV, Evaluation of adnexal masses- correlation of clinical, sonological and histopathological findings in adnexal massesInt J Sci Stud 2017 4(11):88-92.  [Google Scholar]

    [17]Bhagde AD, Jani SK, Patel MS, Shah SR, An analytical study of 50 women presenting with an adnexal massInternational Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2017 6(1):262-66.  [Google Scholar]

    [18]Abduljabbar HS, Bukhari YA, Al Hachim EG, Alshour GS, Amer AA, Shaikhoon MM, Review of 244 cases of ovarian cystsSaudi Med J 2015 36(7):834-38.  [Google Scholar]

    [19]Champawat C, Wani RJ, Management of adnexal masses: Save the ovariesInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol 2017 6(12):5540-43.  [Google Scholar]

    [20]Manivasakan J, Arounassalame B, A study of benign adnexal massesInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol 2012 1(1):12-16.  [Google Scholar]

    [21]Neelgund S, Hiremath P, A retrospective study of ovarian cystsInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol 2016 5(6):1969-73.  [Google Scholar]

    [22]Kim SI, Lim MC, Lim J, Won YJ, Seo SS, Kang S, Incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer according to histologic subtypes in Korea, 1999 to 2012J Gynecol Oncol 2016 27(1):e5  [Google Scholar]

    [23]Kanthikar SN, Dravid NV, Deore PN, Nikumbh DB, Suryawanshi KH, Clinico-histopathological analysis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the ovary: A 3-year prospective study in Dhule, North Maharashtra, IndiaJ Clin Diagn Res 2014 8(8):FC04-07.  [Google Scholar]

    [24]Sharma I, Sarma U, Dutta UC, Pathology of ovarian tumour-A hospital based studyInt J Med Sci Clin Inv 2014 1(6):284-86.  [Google Scholar]