JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/50222.15522
Year : 2021 | Month : Oct | Volume : 15 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : OC20 - OC24

Prognostic Significance of Baseline Serum Calcium Levels in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome- An Observational Study

Rohit Raina1, Puneeta Gupta2

1 Senior Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
2 Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences, Sidhra Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Rohit Raina, H. No. 44, Lane 11, Gurah Keran, Barnai, Bantalab-181123, Jammu, India.
E-mail: rohitraina103@yahoo.com
Abstract

Introduction

The risk stratification is very important for the management of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Extraskeletal calcium plays a critical role in a range of biological processes. There is an urgent need to accurately identify, the additional factors which are important in the clinical course and outcome of patients of ACS.

Aim

To evaluate impact of baseline serum calcium levels in patients with ACS and to determine prognostic significance of baseline serum calcium levels in patients with ACS.

Materials and Methods

The present observational study was conducted on 100 patients of ACS, over a period of one year from December 2018 to December 2019 at Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences, Sidhra, Jammu and Kashmir, India. They were divided into three tertile ranges as: hypocalcaemic (<8.1), normocalcaemic (8.1-10.4), hypercalcaemic (>10.4). The clinical outcome was measured in terms of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) development of acute pulmonary oedema, rates of emergency revascularisation, development of arrhythmias, recurrence of chest pain, mortality within 7 days of admission, readmission rates with reinfarction or any other cardiovascular complication and finally, mortality within 90 days of follow-up. Quantitative variables were compared using ANOVA/Kruskal Wallis Test between the three groups.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 73.29±8.11 years. Baseline calcium on admission was found to be <8.1 mg/dL in ACS patients and more common in males, older age group, patients with higher Body Mass Index (BMI) and was associated with worse prognosis as compared to those with normal serum calcium levels. Mortality within 90 days of follow-up occurred in 42.86%, 20% and 6.25% in unstable angina and 39.29% 11.76% and 13.33% in AMI in hypocalcaemic, normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic groups, respectively. It is inferred that 64% of the patients in hypocalcaemia tertile (n=14) were males in unstable angina and overwhelming 78.57% in AMI.

Conclusion

Hypocalcaemia (corrected calcium <8.1 mg/dL) is common in patients of ACS and a predictor of adverse outcomes.

Keywords

Introduction

The control of communicable diseases and increase in life expectancy due to modified life styles have resulted in increased incidence of Non Communicable Diseases (NCDs) and, thereby, responsible for more than 70% of deaths and more than 80% of Years Lived with Disability (YLD) [1]. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) are a leading cause of death in India involving every class across the social divide and not necessarily those belonging to affluent class as is generally believed [2]. The estimate of age-standardised CVD death rate of 272 per 100,000 population in India is higher than the global average of 235 per 100,000 population [3]. Interestingly, whereas the death rate due to CVD declined by 41% in United States between 1990-2016, in India it rose by 34% from 155.7-209 one death per 100,000 population in the same period and also the CVD is somewhat different from western countries, in India as it shows accelerated course, the early age of onset and the high case fatality rate [3].

In all these years, the prevalence of ischaemic heart disease is increasing and more patients visit the hospital emergency departments with acute coronary events, as a result of which the prognosis is poor in some patients as compared to others [4,5]. It is, therefore assumed that other factors (apart from the patient’s baseline characteristics and traditional risk factors), also play a role in influencing the course of illness in hospital and in immediate postdischarge phase [6].

There has been an ongoing debate on the role of calcium in pathogenesis of vascular diseases but lately, serum calcium levels as an important determinant in acute events was established. Yan SD et al., concluded that lower serum calcium level is a possible indicator of mortality in ACS patients [6]. The extra-skeletal calcium plays a critical role in cardiac contraction, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, electrophysiology of the heart, coagulation pathway and platelet function mediated via the calcium-sensing receptor and in neurotransmitter release, enzyme activity regulation, and blood pressure regulation association [7,8]. Hence, of the present study was to evaluate impact of baseline serum calcium levels in patients with ACS and to determine prognostic significance of baseline serum calcium levels in patients with ACS.

Materials and Methods

This was a single-centre, prospective, observational study conducted in a tertiary care centre, over a period of one year from December 2018 to December 2019 at Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences, Sidhra, Jammu and Kashmir, India. involving 100 diagnosed cases of ACS vide IEC number ASCOMS/IEC/RP&T/2018/288. A written informed consent was obtained from all patients after explaining to them the nature and purpose of the study. ACS was diagnosed according to the criteria defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) [9].

Inclusion criteria: Patients with hypocalcaemia and aged 50-80 years and with normal renal functions tests, with no thyroid abnormality and having no history of malignancy were included in the present study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with renal dysfunction {estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min)}, parathyroid disease, evidence of infection within last 2 weeks, history of malignancy within last 3 years, major trauma or surgery within 4 weeks before admission, patients on calcium and vitamin D supplements and those with hepatic dysfunction were excluded from the study. After serial 12 lead electrocardiogram monitoring and troponin t-test, all routine biochemical tests, baseline serum calcium and albumin levels were done at the time of admission. All serum calcium levels for each patient were corrected for albumin using following formula:

Corrected calcium (mg/dL)=measured total Ca (mg/dL)+0.8 {4.0-serum albumin (g/dL)}, where 4.0 represents the average albumin level. Patients were divided into three tertile ranges depending upon the corrected calcium levels in mg/dL [10].

hypocalcaemic (<8.1);

normocalcaemic (8.1–10.4);

hypercalcaemic (>10.4).

Patients were followed-up for 90 days through routine Outpatient Department (OPD) examinations and hospital medical records.

Statistical Analysis

Normality of data was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If the normality was rejected then non parametric test was used. Statistical tests were applied as follows-Quantitative variables were compared using ANOVA/Kruskal Wallis Test (when the data sets were not normally distributed) between the three groups. The R (version 3.4.1) software was used for managing the data, generating plots, and performing the statistical analyses. Two-sided p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant for all estimates.

Results

In the present study, mean age of the population was 73.29±8.11 years. Out of a total of 100 patients, 40 patients were of unstable angina and 60 were of Acute MI (AMI). It was observed that 64% of the patients in hypocalcaemia tertile (n=14) were males in unstable angina group and overwhelming 78.57% in AMI. On admission, troponin T levels were positive in 66.67% patients of AMI with low baseline serum calcium levels and 33.33% in patients with unstable angina [Table/Fig-1].

Association of troponin T with corrected calcium.

The highest BMI was found to be 27.38 kg/m2 in hypocalcaemic group with mean age of 73.29 years among AMI patients [Table/Fig-2]. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure found to be lower in hypocalcaemic patients in both unstable angina and AMI [Table/Fig-3]. Hypocalcaemic patients requiring emergency revascularisation in unstable angina patients and AMI were 35.71% and 21.43%, respectively. Normocalcaemic patients requiring emergency revascularisation in unstable angina patients and AMI were 70% and 76.47%, respectively. Hypercalcaemic patients requiring emergency revascularisation in unstable angina patients and AMI were 75% and 73.33%, respectively [Table/Fig-4].

Association of baseline characteristics with corrected calcium in unstable angina and AMI.

Baseline characteristicsCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in unstable anginaCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in AMI
Hypocalcaemic (n=14)Normocalcaemic (n=10)Hypercalcaemic (n=16)Hypocalcaemic (n=28)Normocalcaemic (n=17)Hypercalcaemic (n=15)
Age in years
Mean (SD)72.21 (7.53)63.3 (7.66)54.62 (7.9)73.29 (8.11)54.71 (5.88)56.6 (9.5)
Median (IQR)73 (66-78)63 (58-70)54 (49-61)75 (68- 78.500)55 (49.750-57.250)56 (49.250-61.500)
p-value<0.0001<0.0001
Gender
Female5 (35.71%)9 (90.00%)7 (43.75%)6 (21.43%)8 (47.06%)8 (53.33%)
Male9 (64.29%)1 (10.00%)9 (56.25%)22 (78.57%)9 (52.94%)7 (46.67%)
p-value0.0210.068
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2)
Mean (SD)26.19 (3.3)25.55 (3.18)26.84 (3.62)27.38 (4.04)24.52 (2.26)25.98 (2.9)
Median (IQR)26.01 (24.090-29.720)24.93 (24.090-26.400)26.06 (23.915-30.450)27.19 (23.225-30.800)24.22 (23-24.875)25.03 (24.977-27.578)
p-value0.6420.026

p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant


Association of haemodynamic parameters with corrected calcium in unstable angina and AMI.

Haemodynamic parametersCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in unstable anginaCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in AMI
Hypocalcaemic (n=14)Normocalcaemic (n=10)Hypercalcaemic (n=16)Hypocalcaemic (n=28)Normocalcaemic (n=17)Hypercalcaemic (n=15)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Mean (SD)112.14 (21.11)131.8 (24.54)134.88 (13.29)107.29 (14.27)134.59 (16.03)136.8 (19.17)
Median (IQR)108 (94-130)132 (110-150)139 (126 - 143)109 (94-120)130 (128.500-148)130 (123.500-140)
p-value0.007<0.0001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Mean (SD)72.86 (11)77.4 (14.7)85.88 (7.5)69.21 (10.67)89.65 (13.46)86.27 (6.54)
Median (IQR)72 (70-82)79 (62-82)88 (81-92)69 (60-80)90 (82-100)84 (82-89)
p-value0.004<0.0001
Heart rate (bpm) (at the time of admission)
Mean (SD)85.43 (14.32)77.4 (9.14)89 (10.48)87.29 (9.77)74.71 (10.44)84.8 (8.61)
Median (IQR)84 (72-98)76 (74-86)92 (84-98)89 (82-94)72 (67.50-80.50)86 (78-91.50)
p-value0.0590.0003

p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant


Association of emergency revascularisation with corrected calcium in unstable angina and AMI.

Emergency revascularisationCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in unstable anginaCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in AMI
Hypocalcaemic (n=14)Normocalcaemic (n=10)Hypercalcaemic (n=16)Hypocalcaemic (n=28)Normocalcaemic (n=17)Hypercalcaemic (n=15)
No9 (64.29%)3 (30%)4 (25%)22 (78.57%)4 (23.53%)4 (26.67%)
Yes5 (35.71%)7 (70%)12 (75%)6 (21.43%)13 (76.47%)11 (73.33%)
p-value0.0690.0002

p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant


Median LVEF of hypocalcaemic, normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic in unstable angina was 29%, 45% and 55% and in AMI was 30%, 48% and 55%, respectively. Thus, inference can be made that LVEF is significantly lower in hypocalcaemic patients as compared to hypercalcaemic patients [Table/Fig-5].

Association of complications with corrected calcium in unstable angina and AMI.

ComplicationsCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in unstable anginaCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in AMI
Hypocalcaemic (n=14)Normocalcaemic (n=10)Hypercalcaemic (n=16)Hypocalcaemic (n=28)Normocalcaemic (n=17)Hypercalcaemic (n=15)
LVEF (%)
Mean (SD)33.43 (15.53)47.5 (12.08)52.75 (10.02)33.43 (14.74)49.65 (10.45)53.8 (8.2)
Median (IQR)29 (20-48)45 (40-60)55 (45-60)30 (20-45)48 (40-60)55 (49.750-60)
p-value0.0060.0001
Acute pulmonary oedema
Yes7 (50%)3 (30%)3 (18.75%)15 (53.57%)4 (23.53%)2 (13.33%)
p-value0.1860.016
Arrhythmias
Yes7 (50%)1 (10%)3 (18.75%)11 (39.29%)5 (29.41%)4 (26.67%)
p-value0.058*0.649*
Recurrence of chest pain
Yes6 (42.86%)3 (30%)3 (18.75%)15 (53.57%)7 (41.18%)3 (20%)
p-value0.3560.104

p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant


Acute pulmonary oedema was present more in hypocalcaemic patients with unstable angina and AMI as compared to that of normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic patients [Table/Fig-5]. Recurrence of chest pain was higher in hypocalcaemic patients with unstable angina and AMI as compared to that of normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic patients, respectively [Table/Fig-5].

Days of hospitalisation were higher in hypocalcaemic patients with unstable angina and AMI as compared to that of normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic patients [Table/Fig-6].

Association of outcome with corrected calcium in unstable angina and AMI.

OutcomeCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in unstable anginaCorrected calcium (mg/dL) in AMI
Hypocalcaemic (n=14)Normocalcaemic (n=10)Hypercalcaemic (n=16)Hypocalcaemic (n=28)Normocalcaemic (n=17)Hypercalcaemic (n=15)
Days of hospitalisation
Mean (SD)8.64 (2.21)5.1 (0.99)5.06 (0.68)8.82 (2.26)5.53 (0.94)5.47 (0.83)
Median (IQR)8.5 (7-10)5.5 (4-6)5 (5-5.500)9.5 (7 - 10.500)6 (5-6)6 (5-6)
p-value<0.0001<0.0001
Mortality within 7 days of admission
Yes5 (35.71%)1 (10%)2 (12.50%)10 (35.71%)2 (11.76%)1 (6.67%)
p-value0.1870.044
Readmission rate
Yes6 (42.86%)2 (20%)1 (6.25%)13 (46.43%)2 (11.76%)2 (13.33%)
p-value0.0550.014
Mortality within 90 days
Yes6 (42.86%)2 (20%)1 (6.25%)11 (39.29%)2 (11.76%)2 (13.33%)
p-value0.0550.057

p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant


Mortality within 90 days of follow-up was higher in hypocalcaemic patients (42.86%) as compared to normocalcaemic (20%) and hypercalcaemic (6.25%) patients with unstable angina and also higher for hypocalcaemic patients with AMI [Table/Fig-6].

Discussion

The present study conducted to determine prognostic significance of baseline serum calcium levels in patients with ACS. Findings revealed that the serum calcium level is an independent predictor of the cause midterm mortality risk in ACS patients. Serum calcium levels are an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction [5,6]. The low serum calcium levels may influence the cardiac electrophysiology by reducing the calcium influx through the L-type calcium channel, leading to reduced plateau depolarisation and a shortened cardiac action potential. The hypocalcaemia also causes QT prolongation and has postulated to facilitate the development of cardiomyopathy and heart failure, both ultimately leading to poorer outcomes [7,10]. It has also been hypothesised that an increasing level of intracellular calcium in platelet results in increased consumption of calcium, resulting in hypocalcaemia, the assumption being that low calcium level might partially reflect worsened vascular condition in patients of ACS leading to poor outcome [7,10]. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, age, and sex are generally are some confounding factors for CVD [11,12,13].

On admission, troponin T levels were positive in 66.67% patients of AMI with low baseline serum calcium levels and 33.33% in patients with unstable angina [Table/Fig-1]. Hypocalcaemia was documented in 49% cases in a study conducted by Patil S et al., [14]. Significant association was seen between age and corrected calcium in unstable angina patients and AMI patients as also by other authors, indicating that patients in lower quartiles of calcium are older [9,15]. In the present study, mortality within 90 days of follow-up was higher in hypocalcaemia group but overall, the distribution was comparable. Study conducted by Akirov A et al., and also reported similar findings [16]. In the present study, significant association was seen between gender and corrected calcium in unstable angina but not in AMI. Sathyamurthy I et al., and Gomez Alvarez Z et al., reported that males constituted 92% and 76% of their patients with hypocalcaemia, respectively [17,18]. The significant association was seen between BMI and corrected calcium in AMI but not in in unstable angina, in the present study. Meiling J et al., found that hypocalcaemia was predominant in obese individuals with high BMI who were also dyslipidemic [19].

Significant association was also seen between blood pressure and corrected calcium in AMI. However, in a similar study, Meiling J et al., reported no such difference. (p>0.05) [19]. Significant association was seen between heart rate at admission and corrected calcium in AMI (p<0.05) Meiling J et al., also found higher baseline heart rates more in patients with hypocalcaemia, but that was statistically not significant. Thus, blood pressure and heart rates are not shown to significantly associated with corrected calcium levels.

Again, significant association was seen between emergency revascularisation and corrected calcium in AMI but not in unstable angina. The larger percentage of hypocalcaemic subjects were not stable haemodynamically to undergo emergency revascularisation and less percentage is also associated with worse outcome as in some patients’ revascularisation could improve myocardial salvage. In unstable angina and AMI, the LVEF was significantly lower in patients with hypocalcaemia, similar to that seen by Meiling J et al., but not by Lu X et al., [19,20]. The complication of acute pulmonary oedema was significantly more in those with hypocalcaemia in AMI but not in unstable angina. Gomez Polo J et al., and Obradovic S et al., also reported similar findings [21,22].

In both, unstable angina and in AMI incidence of arrhythmias didn’t differ significantly in patients within three tertiles in the present study. In comparison, Gomez Alvarez Z et al., and Gomez Polo JC et al., reported more patients of sustained ventricular arrhythmias and atrioventricular block and Yarmohammadi H et al., found sudden cardiac arrest more common in patients with hypocalcaemia [18,21,23]. The recurrence of chest pain was comparable in both unstable angina and AMI with no significant association with calcium levels.

Kumar S and Saxena P, found higher risk for several in-hospital complications in their study [24]. Days of hospitalisation were significantly longer in hypocalcaemic patients as compared to normocalcaemic and hypercalcaemic patients in both unstable angina and AMI. The findings are in contrast to those reported by Lu X et al., [20]. There is very limited research which describe the association between serum calcium levels and mortality at the end of first 7 days; which was higher in hypocalcaemic patients with AMI but overall, the distribution was comparable in unstable angina. The readmission rate in AMI was significantly more in hypocalcaemic group but not in unstable angina. Obradovic S et al., reported similar correlation [22].

The present study didn’t find significant association between mortality within 90 days of follow-up and corrected calcium in unstable angina and in AMI. However, Gomez Alvarez Z et al., Lu X et al., Sauter TC et al., and Miura S et al., found in-hospital mortality significantly higher in hypocalcaemics (12.7%) as compared to normocalcaemics (6.5%) and hypercalcaemics subjects (2.9%) [18,20,25,26].

Limitation(s)

The study evaluated serum calcium only at the time of admission, but serum calcium levels may vary over time. Although, numerous relevant points were considered some potential confounders (e.g., vitamin D, bone metabolites, and thyroid hormones) were not considered. Present study revealed that serum calcium can be used as an available biomarker in the midterm risk stratification of patients with ACS. Further studies can be done to clarify the underlying mechanisms and to determine how therapy affecting serum calcium levels can improve the prognosis.

Conclusion(s)

In order to identify patients with potential outcomes early, the measurement of total serum calcium is an easy and economical strategy as soon as the initial management of the patient is started. This is especially important in a country like India with limited healthcare facilities and resource as there is need for appropriate triage and clinical resource utilisation including decisions regarding transfer to tertiary centres and for early hospital discharge in low-risk patients.

p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significantp-value <0.05 was considered statistically significantp-value <0.05 was considered statistically significantp-value <0.05 was considered statistically significantp-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant

References

[1]The World health report: Today’s challenges. Geneva, World Health Organisation, [http://www.who.int/whr/2003/en]  [Google Scholar]

[2]India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative CVD CollaboratorsThe changing patterns of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016 Lancet Glob Health 2018 6(12):e1339-51.Doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30407-8. Epub 2018 Sep 12. PMID: 30219317; PMCID: PMC6227386  [Google Scholar]

[3]Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A, Cardiovascular diseases in India: Current epidemiology and future directions Circulation 2016 133(16):1605-20.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.00872927142605  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Chow C, Cardona M, Raju PK, Iyengar S, Sukumar A, Raju R, Cardiovascular disease and risk factors among 345 adults in rural India–the Andhra Pradesh Rural Health Initiative Int J Cardiol 2007 116:180-85.10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.03.04316839628  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Gupta R, Joshi P, Mohan V, Reddy KS, Yusuf S, Epidemiology and causation of coronary heart disease and stroke in India Heart 2008 94:16-26.10.1136/hrt.2007.13295118083949  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Yan SD, Liu XJ, Peng Y, Xia TL, Liu W, Tsauo JY, Admission serum calcium levels improve the GRACE risk score prediction of hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome Clin Cardiol 2016 39(9):516-23.Epub 2016 Jun 910.1002/clc.2255727279131  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Reid IR, Bristow SM, Bolland MJ, Calcium and cardiovascular disease Endocrinol Metab 2017 32(3):339-49.10.3803/EnM.2017.32.3.33928956363  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Shiyovich A, Plact Y, Gilutz H, Serum calcium levels independently predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2018 28(5):510-16.Epub 2018 Feb 110.1016/j.numecd.2018.01.01329501443  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease Report of the Joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organisation Task Force on Standardisation of Clinical Nomenclature Circulation 1979 59:607-09.10.1161/01.CIR.59.3.607761341  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Shirakabe A, Kiuchi K, Kobayashi N, Okazaki H, Matsushita M, Shibata Y, Importance of the corrected calcium level in patients with acute heart failure requiring intensive care Circ Rep 2020 3(1):44-54.10.1253/circrep.CR-20-006833693289  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Wang Y, Ma H, Hao X, Yang J, Chen Q, Lu L, Low serum calcium is associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a Chinese population with coronary artery disease Sci Rep 2016 6:2228310.1038/srep2228326924008  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Kannel WB, Neaton JD, Wentworth D, Thomas HE, Stamler J, Hulley SB, Overall and coronary heart disease mortality rates in relation to major risk factors in 325,348 men screened for the MRFIT. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Am Heart J 1986 112(4):825-36.10.1016/0002-8703(86)90481-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Rosenman RH, Brand RJ, Jenkins D, Friedman M, Straus R, Wurm M, Coronary heart disease in Western Collaborative Group Study. Final follow-up experience of 8 1/2 years JAMA 1975 233:872-77.10.1001/jama.1975.032600800340161173896  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Patil S, Gandhi S, Prajapati P, Afzalpurkar S, Patil OA, Khatri M, A study of electrolyte imbalance in acute myocardial infarction patients at a tertiary care hospital in western Maharashtra International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2016 3(12):3568-71.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Hromadka M, Dragounova E, Bernat I, Seidlerova J, Ostadal P, Rokyta R, Do ionised calcium and phosphorus levels have any prognostic value in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction J Clin Exp Cardiolog 2015 6:38510.4172/2155-9880.1000385  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[16]Akirov A, Gorshtein A, Shraga-Slutzky I, Shimon I, Calcium levels on admission and before discharge are associated with mortality risk in hospitalised patients Endocrine 2017 57(2):344-51.10.1007/s12020-017-1353-y28667379  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Sathyamurthy I, Shyam P, Kirubakaran K, Srinivasan K, Jayanthi K, 25 Hydroxy vitamin D3 levels in acute coronary syndrome Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2012 2(4):141-43.10.1016/j.jicc.2012.10.001  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[18]Gomez-Alvarez Z, Gomez Polo J, Ferrera C, Ruiz-Pizarro V, Rico C, Noriega F, Hypocalcaemia at admission: A predictor of prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes European Heart Journal 2018 39(1):175010.1093/eurheartj/ehy565.P1750  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[19]Meiling J, Baofa Y, Guangjing Z, Hui W, Effects of hypocalcaemia on prognosis of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and nursing observation Int J Clin Exp Med 2018 11(9):9762-67.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Lu X, Wang Y, Meng H, Chen P, Huang Y, Wang Z, Association of admission serum calcium levels and in-hospital mortality in patients with Acute ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction. An eight-year, single-center study in China PLoS ONE 2014 9(6):e9989510.1371/journal.pone.009989524926660  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Gomez Polo J, Ferrera C, Ruiz-Pizarro V, Gomez-Alvarez Z, Romero-Delgado T, Rico C, Usefulness of hypocalcaemia at admission as a prognostic marker in patients with acute coronary syndromes Eur Heart J 2019 40(1):547710.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0431  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[22]Obradovic S, Vukotic S, Banovic M, Dzudovic B, Marinkovic J, Vujanic S, Prognostic value of serum parathyroid hormone in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients Vojnosanitetski Pregled 2017 74(3):232-40.10.2298/VSP150816108O  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[23]Yarmohammadi H, Uy-Evanado A, Reinier K, Rusinaru C, Chugh H, Jui J, Serum calcium and risk of sudden cardiac arrest in the general population Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2017 92(10):1479-85.10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.02828943016  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Kumar S, Saxena P, To evaluate the role of plasma vitamin D level as a prognostic marker and its relation to in-hospital complications in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Int J Adv Med 2016 3(4):976-81.10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20163734  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[25]Sauter TC, Lindner G, Ahmad SS, Leichtle AB, Fiedler GM, Exadaktylos AK, Calcium disorders in the emergency department: Independent risk factors for mortality PLoSONE 2015 10(7):e013278810.1371/journal.pone.013278826172117  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Miura S, Yoshihisa A, Takiguchi M, Shimizu T, Nakamura Y, Yamauchi H, Association of hypocalcaemia with mortality in hospitalised patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease J Card Fail 2015 21(8):621-27.Doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 May 14. PMID: 25982827  [Google Scholar]