JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/48845.15036
Year : 2021 | Month : Jun | Volume : 15 | Issue : 06 Full Version Page : DC38 - DC42

A Study on Phenotypic Association between Biofilm and Drug Resistant Klebsiella Species Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections

Ishrath Razia Riaz1, Anusha Hindupur2, Akhil Raj Thota3, Arulmozhi Balakrishnan4, Iswarya Anbazhagan5, Indra Priya Palanisamy6, Prabu Dhandapani7

1 Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Laboratory Division, National Institute of Epidemiology, Indian Council of Medical Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
4 Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
5 Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
6 Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
7 Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Prabu Dhandapani, Dr ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: bruibms@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Urinary Tract Infections (UTI’s) are considered to be one of the most prominent infections, worldwide. Klebsiella species are the commonest cause of community and hospital acquired UTIs. Biofilm production and hyper-mucous production are the important virulence factors among the pathogenic strains of Klebsiella species. Biofilm-associated and Hyper-Mucoviscosity (HMV) variants of Kiebsiella spp. is potent enough to easily colonise the urinary tract, develop the invasiveness of infection and mainly contribute in higher resistance to most classes of antibiotics. Understanding the virulence factors associated with Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Klebsiella spp. would aid in estimating the resistance related mortality.

Aim

To identify and comparatively analyse the HMV, biofilm-producing capacity and drug resistance pattern of archived Klebsiella spp. isolates from UTI.

Materials and Methods

The present retrospective analysis was done from January to March 2020 on 207 archived Klebsiella spp. isolates collected between December 2017 to January 2019. The presumptive identification of Klebsiella spp. was done using standard microbiological techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Klebsiella spp. were tested for biofilm production using microtiter plate method and HMV phenotype by string test. Descriptive statistics and Student’s t-test were performed to analyse the data.

Results

A total of 207 Klebsiella isolates were used in this study and majority (94.6%) of the isolates were identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae subspecies pneumoniae. Out of 207 isolates, 14 isolates (6.8%) were Extensively Drug Resistant (XDR); 141 isolates (68.1%) were MDR; 43 isolates (20.8%) were resistant to one or two class of antibiotics. Biofilm detection assay showed 201 (97.1) out of 207 were strong biofilm producers and 6 (2.9%) were moderate biofilm producers. String test for HMV detection showed only 2 (1%) isolates were positive HMV producers. Among the biofilm producers, majority of the Klebsiella isolates were found to be MDR.

Conclusion

Resistance in Klebsiella spp. is an evolving problem. Majority of the drug resistant Klebsiella isolates used in present study were strong biofilm producers. This study emphasises on the sensible use of last resort drugs to cut down the evolution of resistant strains.

Keywords

Introduction

The UTI is one of the most common and frequent bacterial infection in both the community and hospital setting worldwide and it is an important health problem in all age groups. UTIs account for more than 7 million visits to doctor’s place and complicate over 1 million hospital admissions annually. Community Acquired (CA)-UTIs affect more than 150 million people annually while the prevalence of healthcare associated-UTIs ranges between 1.4- 5.1%. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family are well-known for the cause of UTIs, predominantly Escherichia coli (E. coli) followed by Klebsiella and Proteus [1,2].

Klebsiella is a widely recognised opportunistic pathogen often acting as agents of bacteremia’s, 6-17% UTIs, respiratory tract infections, gastrointestinal tract infections and wound infections, particularly in intensive care unit patients and immunocompromised patients [3]. Success of K. pneumoniae as a pathogen associated with both CA infections and hospital acquired infection has been recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO), due to the major factor that it can confer high-tolerance level of antibiotic resistance [4]. Carbapenems and colistin are the last resort drugs, while fosfomycin and tetracycline are used as alternative drug options and spread of resistance to these antibiotics further increases the concern [5,6]. K. pneumoniae isolates have been associated with hyper production of capsular polysaccharide i.e., HMV phenotype which further confers resistance to serum complement and phagocytosis by white blood cells [7]. K. pneumoniae is also known for its capability to form biofilms, that supports the bacterial attachment to biotic and abiotic surfaces, protecting antibiotics penetration and reducing its effects [8,9].

Prevalence of virulent and XDR Klebsiella is increasing gradually in our setting which is a significant global burden of public health. The increase in resistance of Klebsiella spp. is leading to doubtfulness of drug of choice. This emergence of drug resistance can lead to end of antibiotic era. Thus, the aim of the study was to understand, analyse, compare the phenotypic dynamics of antibiotic resistance and virulence in special reference to biofilm and HMV of Klebsiella spp. in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Materials and Methods

The present retrospective study included 207archived Klebsiella spp. isolates which were collected from UTI patients and maintained at the Department of Microbiology, Dr. ALM PG IBMS, University of Madras, Tamil Nadu, India, were included in the study and were stored and maintained at -20°C between December 2017 to January 2019. Retrospective analysis of these archived isolates was performed during Janurary 2020 to March 2020.

The isolates were revived in Macconkey agar and the colonies were subjected to gram staining and biochemical tests to confirm the Klebsiella spp.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

All the isolates were subsequently subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [10]. Extended Spectrum ß-Lactamase (ESBL) resistance was detected using ceftazidime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg) discs for screening, followed by confirmatory test using ceftazidime (30 μg) and ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (10/5 μg) discs. The imipenem-EDTA Combined Disc Test (CDT) was performed to confirm carbapenem resistance among the study isolates, while AmpC lactamases resistance was detected using cefoxitin (30 μg) [11]. Resistance to fluoroquinolones was detected using discs of nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), and levofloxacin (5 μg). Gentamicin (10 μg) and amikacin (30 μg) discs were used to detect resistance to aminoglycosides [11]. The isolates were also tested against other antibiotics like ampicillin (10 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), co-trimoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), meropenem (10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), fosfomycin (200 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) and chloramphenicol (30 μg). E.coli (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 25922) and Klebsiella (ATCC 700603) were used as control strains. The inhibition zones were measured, and results were interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines [11].

Detection of HMV Phenotype using String Test

The HMV phenotype was determined using a modified string test. Klebsiella isolates was cultured on MacConkey agar and the 24 hours culture of Klebsiella obtained were touched with an inoculation loop and then the loop was lifted from the agar surface. Strains were defined as HMV if there was formation of a viscous string longer than 5 mm [7].

Biofilm Detection Assays

The biofilm producing capacity of the Klebsiella isolates was determined by Congo Red Agar (CRA) method and tissue culture plate method. The qualitative detection of biofilm production was performed by CRA method. Briefly, the Klebsiella isolates were inoculated in the CRA medium, composed of brain heart infusion broth (37 gm/L), sucrose (5 gm/L), agar number 1 (10 gm/L) and Congo red dye (0.8 gm/L). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours aerobically. Black colonies with a dry crystalline consistency indicated biofilm production [Table/Fig-1].

Black crystalline biofilm production by standard control strain of E. coli in Congo Red Agar (CRA) medium.

Tissue culture plate method, which is a quantitative, gold-standard method for biofilm detection was performed for all the Klebsiella isolates. Briefly, 1 μL of overnight culture was inoculated into 100 μL of fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) broth in each well of a 96-well polystyrene plate. Negative control wells contained uninoculated sterile broth. After 5-24 hours of static incubation at 37°C, non-adherent bacteria were removed by gentle tapping and the wells were washed gently three times with 200 μL of Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) (pH 7.2). The bacteria were then stained with 200 μL of 0.1% crystal violet for one hour. The supernatant was discarded, and plates were washed with 200 μL of PBS to remove unattached cells. The biofilm-bound dye was then eluted with 200 μL of 70% acetic acid, and the optical density at 595 nm (OD595) was determined. The suitable positive control was used. Each assay was performed in triplicate. Based on the adherence capabilities, the strains were classified as given in [Table/Fig-2] [9].

Formula to interpretate biofilm production.

Average OD valueBiofilm production
OD≤ODc*Nil
ODc<OD≤2×ODcWeak
2ODc<OD≤4×ODcModerate
4×ODc<ODStrong

*ODc-OD cut-off-Three standard deviations above the mean OD of the negative control


Statistical Analysis

The data obtained by quantitative biofilm assay was analysed by Student’s t-test using the online statistical software, GraphPad QuickCalcs. The results were expressed in the form of mean±SD (Standard Deviation). The p-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Bacterial strains: Among the 207 Klebsiella isolates, 196 (94.6%) isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae subspecies pneumoniae, 2 (1.0%) isolates were Klebsiella oxytoca, 2 (1.0%) isolates were Klebsiella aerogenes and 7 (3.4%) belonged to Klebsiella pneumoniae subspecies ozaenae.

Drug resistance: Out of 207 isolates included in the study, 14 isolates (6.8%) were XDR; 141 isolates (68.1%) were MDR; 43 isolates (20.8%) were resistant to only one or two classes of antibiotic, while 9 isolates (4.3%) were totally susceptible. ESBL production was observed in 159 (76.8%) of the isolates. Amp-C lactamases were detected in 141 (68.1%) of the isolates. By CDT, carbapenem resistance was detected in 74 (35.7%) of the isolates.

Resistance to cotrimoxazole, cefepime and azithromycin was observed in 147 (71%), 159 (76.8%) and 165 (79.7%) of the Klebsiella isolates respectively. Highest sensitivity was observed for chloramphenicol 112 (54.1%), followed by fosfomycin 108 (52.2%). The [Table/Fig-3] summarises the antibiotic profile of Klebsiella isolates used in this study.

Antibiogram of Klebsiella isolates included in this study.

AntibioticsConcentration (μg)Interpretation
Resistant n (%)Intermediate n (%)Susceptible n (%)
Cephalosporins
Cefoxitin- 2nd Gen30141 (68.1)9 (4.3)57 (27.5)
Cefotaxime- 3rd Gen30175 (84.5)13 (6.3)19 (9.2)
Ceftriaxone- 3rd Gen30164 (79.2)9 (4.3)34 (16.4)
Ceftazidime- 3th Gen30159 (76.8)9 (4.3)39 (18.8)
Cefepime- 4th Gen30159 (76.8)5 (2.4)43 (20.8)
Carbapenems
Meropenem10108 (52.2)22 (10.6)77 (37.2)
Imipenem1074 (35.7)44 (21.3)89 (43.0)
Fluoroquinolones
Nalidixic acid- 1st Gen30155 (74.9)4 (1.9)48 (23.2)
Ciprofloxacin- 2nd Gen5157 (75.8)15 (7.2)35 (16.9)
Norfloxacin- 2nd Gen10153 (73.9)5 (2.4)49 (23.8)
Ofloxacin- 2nd Gen5146 (70.5)11 (5.3)50 (24.2)
Levofloxacin- 2nd Gen5149 (72.0)7 (3.4)51 (24.7)
Aminoglycosides
Gentamycin10102 (49.3)26 (12.6)79 (38.2)
Amikacin30111 (53.6)19 (9.2)77 (37.2)
Penicillin’s
Ampicillin10198 (95.7)4 (1.9)5 (2.4)
Piperacillin100141 (68.1)29 (14.0)37 (17.9)
Other antibiotics
Ceftazidime/Clavulanic acid10.0/5.0163 (78.74)044 (21.25)
Aztreonam30149 (71.98)12 (5.79)46 (22.22)
Azithromycin15165 (79.71)2 (0.96)40 (19.32)
Tetracycline30127 (61.35)5 (2.41)75 (36.23)
Chloramphenicol3086 (41.54)9 (4.34)112 (54.10)
Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole (Co-trimoxazole)1.25/23.75147 (71.01)3 (1.44)57 (27.53)
Fosfomycin20085 (41.06)14 (6.76)108 (52.17)

Eighty-one different combinations of drug resistance patterns were observed among the 207 Klebsiella isolates included in the study (supplementary). Combination 19 (C19) was the most frequently observed combination with 14 (6.8%) isolates belonging to XDR category, followed by C60 and C67 with 13 (6.3%) and 11 (5.3%) of the isolates belonging to MDR category respectively. The details of other drug resistance combination patterns are shown in [Table/Fig-4].

Different combinations of drug resistance observed among the study isolates.

String test: Out of 207 isolates, only 2 (1.0%) isolates showed the HMV phenotype [Table/Fig-5].

Viscous string denoting Hyper-Mucoviscosity (HMV) of the Klebsiella strain.

Biofilm detection: In biofilm detection by CRA method, none of the isolates showed black crystalline formation.

In titre plate method, based on the ODc cut-off=0.048, 201 (97.1%) of the Klebsiella isolates were found to be strong biofilm producers (mean OD=0.88±1.06) and 6 (2.9%) of the isolates showed moderate biofilm formation (mean OD=0.17±0.02) [Table/Fig-6].

Biofilm production of the Klebsiella strain by titre plate method.

OD valueBiofilm production levelBiofilm producers n (%)
ODc cut-off - 0.048
>0.048 to ≤0.096Weak0/207
>0.096 to ≤0.192Moderate6/207, (2.9%)
>0.192Strong201/207, (97.1%)

Of the 201 strong biofilm producers, 13 (6.5%) were XDR strains (mean OD=0.43±0.18), 138 (68.6%) were MDR strains, 41 (20.4%) isolates were resistant to either one or two classes of antibiotics only (mean OD=0.44±0.20) and 9 (4.5%) of the Klebsiella isolates were susceptible to all the antibiotics (mean OD=0.43±0.19). Among the six moderate biofilm producing strains, 1 (16.7%) isolate was found to be XDR (mean OD=0.19±0) and 3 (50%) strains belonged to MDR category (mean OD=0.16±0.02) 2 (33.3%) isolates were resistant to either one or two classes of antibiotics only.

On analysing the OD values of XDR (mean OD=0.41±0.18) and MDR (mean OD=0.44±0.2) Klebsiella isolates, no significant variation was observed (p=0.5529). Similarly, there was a very little variation between the OD values of XDR and susceptible (mean OD=0.43±0.19) strains (p=0.8015).

Discussion

In the present study, the biofilm forming ability of the Klebsiella isolates with respect to antibiotic resistance was analysed, owing to the rapid emergence of MDR and XDR Klebsiella strains. In this study, majority of the Klebsiella isolates obtained from urine samples were identified as K. pnuemoniae. The result of this study was in line with other studies that have documented K. pnuemoniae as the predominant cause of UTI:3.8% of K. pnuemoniae isolates vs 0.7% of other Klebsiella spp. in Nepal [12]; 8.78% vs 5% in Pakistan [13] and 65.5% vs 34.5% in Ghana [14]. Mohammed MA et al., reported that K.pneumonia (16.3%) was the only Klebsiella spp. identified among 160 culture positive urine samples [15]. K. oxytoca as a cause of bacterial UTI is being frequently reported from other studies [14-17]. In the present study, 1% of the Klebsiella isolates were identified as K.oxytoca. In studies from Iraq and Zimbabwe, K.oxytoca was identified in 11% and 7% of the Klebsiella strains obtained from urine samples respectively [16,17]. In another study, K.oxytoca accounted for 38% of the Klebsiella-associated UTI [14]. In a study by Mohammed MA et al., K.pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae (16.3%) was the most frequently detected Klebsiella species in urine samples, which was similar to present study. Also, in this study, K.oxytoca was identified in 2.5% of 160 bacterial species isolated from urine samples [15].

In this study, majority of the Klebsiella isolates were sensitive to chloramphenicol, followed by fosfomycin and imipenem. However, contrasting results have been documented in other studies. While Klebsiella strains showed maximum sensitivity to aztreonam, levofloxacin and piperacillin in a study from Turkey, another study from Russia found that all the urinary K. pneumoniae strains were sensitive to meropenem, amikacin and ciprofloxacin [18,19]. In line with present study findings, a study from North India found that the Klebsiella isolates were sensitive to fosfomycin and carbapenem group [20]. In South India, it was reported that the urinary K. pneumoniae isolates were sensitive to amikacin, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone [21].

High resistance was shown by the Klebsiella isolates used in this study to the commonly prescribed antibiotics like ampicillin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. Similar results have been documented in other studies [21-23]. This could be due to the fact that these antibiotics have been used as first line drugs for UTI for many years, which has resulted in greater resistance in the community.

ESBL producers are more often implicated in UTIs, with prolonged duration of hospital stay, increased cost of hospitalisation and high mortality rate associated with ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp [24]. In present study, ESBL production was seen in 76.8% of the Klebsiella isolates which was very high when compared to other studies [21,25,26].

Carbapenems are the first choice of treatment for infections caused by Klebsiella strains producing ESBL and Amp-C enzymes [27-29]. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae has become a global threat. The results of this study showed that 35.7% of the Klebsiella isolates were carbapenem resistant, which was inconsistent with a previous study from South India [21].

String test revealed that only two isolates belonged to the HMV phenotype. This was in contrast to the results obtained by Vuotto C et al., wherein none of the Klebsiella spp isolates were classified as HMV, despite producing moist mucoid colonies [30].

It has been reported that the CRA method has very poor sensitivity in detecting biofilm when compared with the tissue culture plate method [8]. Similarly, in the present study none of the isolates were found to produce exopolysaccharide by CRA, while all the 207 isolates were found to be biofilm producers by tissue culture plate method. CRA method was not recommended for biofilm detection by Knobloch JK et al., in their study [31].

Biofilm producing organisms are considered to be intrinsically more resistant to antimicrobial agents. In the present study, 97.1% of the Klebsiella spp isolates were strong biofilm producers. However, no significant association was found between antibiotic resistance and biofilm forming ability, contradicting the results of previous reports [30-32]. In support of present study findings, Nirwati H et al., observed no association between K. pnuemoniae MDR strains and biofilm production based on statistical analysis [33].

This study emphasises on the judicious use of last line drugs and provides adequate knowledge about the current trends in susceptibility patterns of urinary Klebsiella spp. isolates and also confers in-depth phenotypic correlation between drug resisting and biofilm producing capacity among urinary Klebsiella spp. isolates.

Limitation(s)

The present study focused on the phenotypic correlation in association in depth without any molecular analysis and a detailed molecular level research has to be conducted further to understand insights of the biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance.

Conclusion(s)

In this study, majority of the Klebsiella strains were resistant to most classes of the drugs and resistance profile was found to be high with ESBL production. In this study, there was high incidence of MDR Klebsiella spp and majority of MDR Klebsiella isolates were strong biofilm producers. Hence, biofilm may be one of the important factors for the drug resistance among the Klebsiella species causing UTI.

References

[1]Kalal BS, Nagaraj S, Urinary tract infections: A retrospective, descriptive study of causative organisms and antimicrobial pattern of samples received for culture, from a tertiary care setting Germs 2016 6(4):132-38.10.11599/germs.2016.110028053916  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Tabak YP, Sung AH, Ye G, Vankeepuram L, Gupta V, McCann E, Attributable clinical and economic burden of carbapenem-non-susceptible gram-negative infections in patients hospitalised with complicated urinary tract infections J Hosp Infect 2019 102(1):37-44.10.1016/j.jhin.2018.11.01830503367  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, Study Guide for Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology-E-Book 2016 Jun 30 Elsevier Health Sciences  [Google Scholar]

[4]Mendelson M, Matsoso MP, The World Health Organization global action plan for antimicrobial resistance SAMJ: South African Medical Journal 2015 105(5):32510.7196/SAMJ.964426242647  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Sherry N, Howden B, Emerging gram-negative resistance to last-line antimicrobial agents fosfomycin, colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam–epidemiology, laboratory detection and treatment implications Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2018 16(4):289-306.10.1080/14787210.2018.145380729543500  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Sahoo RK, Das A, Sahoo S, Gaur M, Rao EV, Subudhi E, The first report of colistin–carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae ST70 isolated from the pediatric unit in India Braz J Microbiol 2020 51(1):01-03.10.1007/s42770-019-00181-431707716  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Mohammed ES, Flayyih MT, Detection of rmpA and magA genes and hypermucoviscosity phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from water samples in compare with clinical isolates Curr Res Microbiol Biotechnol 2018 6(1):1424-30.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Hassan A, Usman J, Kaleem F, Omair M, Khalid A, Iqbal M, Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates Braz J Infect Dis 2011 15(4):305-11.10.1016/S1413-8670(11)70197-0  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[9]Mathlouthi A, Pennacchietti E, Biase D, Effect of temperature, pH and plasmids on in vitro biofilm formation in escherichia coli Acta Naturae 2018 10(4):129-32.10.32607/20758251-2018-10-4-129-13230713773  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Bauer AT, Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method Am J Clin Pathol 1966 45:149-58.10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.4935325707  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11] Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-eighth Informational Supplement 2018 Wayne, Pennsylvania, USACLSI  [Google Scholar]

[12]Shakya P, Shrestha D, Maharjan E, Sharma VK, Paudyal R, ESBL production among E. coli and Klebsiella spp. causing urinary tract infection: A hospital-based study Open Microbiol J 2017 11:23-30.10.2174/187428580171101002328553414  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Dar SF, Atif MM, Arshad MH, Hayat MF, Dar TF, Urinary tract pathogens and their patterns of resistance to commonly used antibiotics Rawal Med J 2020 45(1):22-26.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Quansah E, Amoah Barnie P, Omane Acheampong D, Obiri-Yeboah D, Odarkor Mills R, Asmah E, Geographical distribution of β-Lactam resistance among Klebsiella spp. from selected health facilities in Ghana Trop Med Infect Dis 2019 4(3):117-30.10.3390/tropicalmed403011731484298  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Mohammed MA, Alnour TM, Shakurfo OM, Aburass MM, Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacterial strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Messalata Central Hospital, Libya Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2016 9(8):771-76.10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.06.01127569886  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Mbanga J, Dube S, Munyanduki H, Prevalence and drug resistance in bacteria of the urinary tract infections in Bulawayo province, Zimbabwe East Afr J Public Health 2010 7(3):229-32.10.4314/eajph.v7i3.6473321516960  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]AL-Khikani FH, Abadi RM, Ayit AS, Emerging carbapenemase Klebsiella oxytoca with multidrug resistance implicated in urinary tract infection Biomedical Biotechnol Res J 2020 4(2):148-51.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Demir M, Kazanasmaz H, Uropathogens and antibiotic resistance in the community and hospital-induced urinary tract infected children J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020 20:68-73.10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.01931340182  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Khaertynov KS, Anokhin VA, Rizvanov AA, Davidyuk YN, Semyenova DR, Lubin SA, Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from neonates with sepsis Front Med 2018 5:225-33.10.3389/fmed.2018.0022530155466  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Chooramani G, Jain B, Chauhan PS, Prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of bacteria causing urinary tract infection; study of a tertiary care hospital in North India Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 2020 8(3):890-93.10.1016/j.cegh.2020.02.018  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[21]Dillirani V, Suresh R, A study on prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of urinary Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care centre in South India Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2018 7(4):969-73.10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.103  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[22]Basavaraj CM, Jyothi P, Antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from patients with urinary tract infections in SBMPMC hospital Bijapur, India Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2014 5:376-82.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Pai V, Nair B, Etiology and sensitivity of uropathogens in outpatients and inpatients with urinary tract infection: Implications on empiric therapy Ann Trop Med Public Health 2012 5(3):181-84.10.4103/1755-6783.98610  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S, Kaye KS, Ben-Ami R, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y, Clinical and economic impact of bacteremia with extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae Antimicrob Agents Chemotherapy 2006 50(4):1257-62.10.1128/AAC.50.4.1257-1262.200616569837  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Romero ED, Padilla TP, Hernández AH, Grande RP, Vázquez MF, García IG, Prevalence of clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. producing multiple extended-spectrum β-lactamases Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007 59(4):433-37.10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.06.00717913435  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]El Bouamri MC, Arsalane L, El Kamouni Y, Zouhair S, Antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary Klebsiella pneumoniae and the emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains: A retrospective study from a university hospital in Morocco, North Africa Afr Journal Urol 2015 21(1):36-40.10.1016/j.afju.2014.10.004  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[27]Paterson DL, Bonomo RA, Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: A clinical update Clin Microbiol Rev 2005 18(4):657-86.10.1128/CMR.18.4.657-686.200516223952  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Pitout JD, Laupland KB, Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae: An emerging public-health concern Lancet Infect Dis 2008 8(3):159-66.10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70041-0  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[29]Jacoby GA, AmpC β-lactamases Clin Microbiol Rev 2009 22:161-82.10.1128/CMR.00036-0819136439  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Vuotto C, Longo F, Pascolini C, Donelli G, Balice MP, Libori MF, Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary strains J Appl Microbiol 2017 123(4):1003-18.10.1111/jam.1353328731269  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Rohde H, Mack D, Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus Med Microbiol Immunol 2002 191(2):101-06.10.1007/s00430-002-0124-312410349  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Subramanian P, Shanmugam N, Sivaraman U, Kumar S, Selvaraj S, Antiobiotic resistance pattern of biofilm-forming uropathogens isolated from catheterised patients in Pondicherry, India Australas Med J 2012 5(7):344-48.10.4066/AMJ.2012.119322905060  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Nirwati H, Sinanjung K, Fahrunissa F, Wijaya F, Napitupulu S, Hati VP, Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital, Klaten, Indonesia BMC Proc 2019 13(11):01-08.10.1186/s12919-019-0176-731890013  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]