JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Ophthalmology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/48160.14813
Year : 2021 | Month : Apr | Volume : 15 | Issue : 04 Full Version Page : NC13 - NC17

Circadian Variation of Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Cross-sectional Study

Raheeba Pakeer Muhammed1, Neeta Sidhan2, Beena Thankappan3

1 Junior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Neeta Sidhan, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Vanchiyoor, Trivandrum-695035, Kerala, India.
E-mail: neetasidhan@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Introduction

Various haemodynamic factors have been implicated as pathophysiological mechanisms in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) other than raised Intraocular Pressure (IOP). However, the exact relationship still remains unclear.

Aim

To examine the circadian pattern of Blood Pressure (BP), IOP and Ocular Perfusion Pressure (OPP) with the aim of understanding their relationships in a cohort of patients with POAG.

Materials and Methods

A cross-divtional study was conducted in which 44 cases of newly diagnosed, non-hypertensive patients with POAG were enrolled and categorised based on the severity of glaucoma. Recording of BP and IOP were done every 4th hourly during a 24 hour hospital stay. The Mean OPP (MOPP) was calculated as 2/3×Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)-IOP. Systolic OPP (SOPP) was calculated as Systolic BP-IOP and Diastolic OPP (DOPP) was calculated as Diastolic BP-IOP. The diurnal, nocturnal and 24 hour fluctuations were derived from the difference between the highest and lowest values within each period. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of the variables with age and severity of POAG were performed

Results

Significant positive correlation of the nocturnal fluctuations in MAP (r=0.533), SOPP (r=0.835), DOPP (r =0.768), MOPP (r=0.685) and 24 hour fluctuation in MOPP (r=0.636) were noted with severity of glaucoma on multivariate analysis. No significant correlation of these parameters with age was noted on multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

Nocturnal dip in OPP was an important observation among patients with POAG, potentially contributing to its pathophysiology.

Keywords

Introduction

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) is a chronic progressive optic neuropathy characterized by retinal ganglion cell death and visual field loss, frequently associated with elevated IOP, recognised as one of the strongest known risk factors [1,2]. However, progression of glaucoma is seen to occur despite adequate reduction of IOP. Vascular risk factors such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, vasospasm etc., have been implicated as likely contributing risk factors in such cases [3,4]. OPP considered as the difference in BP between the arterial and venous parts of the vascular beds all through the eye, it is an important determinant of ocular blood flow [5]. It is expressed as the difference between BP and IOP (since venous pressure is analogous to IOP in the eye) [6]. The study of the relationships between IOP, BP and OPP enables us to hypothetically explain why individuals with high IOP have low OPP while others with low IOP still have low OPP (due to low BP) and hence is relevant to understand the various patterns of IOP and optic nerve damage in glaucoma [7].

Population based studies have shown lower DOPP as an independent risk factor for POAG [8,9], while others have shown wider circadian fluctuations in MOPP to be associated with POAG [10,11]. The exact relationship however between OPP and glaucoma still remains unclear. Moreover as both BP and IOP vary considerably with geographical and racial differences, it is pertinent that variations could occur in the distribution and determinants of OPP and its relationship with glaucoma in the South Indian population too. This study hence was undertaken with the aim of understanding the circadian pattern of OPP among patients from South India.

Materials and Methods

The present study was a cross-sectional observational study which included newly diagnosed, untreated cases of POAG above 40 years of age, attending glaucoma clinic of a tertiary eye hospital in South India. The study duration was 18 months beginning from June 2016 to December 2017. It was commenced after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. (LetterNo:51/HEC/RIOTVPM dated 10/02/2016). Subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited after obtaining a written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria: 1) Age above 40 years; and 2) newly diagnosed, untreated cases of POAG.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with significant anterior segment or corneal pathology affecting proper measurement of IOP by GAT, cases with features of angle closure glaucoma or secondary glaucoma, presence of any other retinal pathology, optic neuropathy due to other causes, cases with systemic hypertension on treatment and those who were not willing to give consent.

All study participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination that included a detailed medical history recording, measurement of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) using Snellen chart, slit lamp biomicroscopy. Measurement of IOP was done using Goldman Applanation Tonometry (GAT), Gonioscopy, visual field assessment using Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA), 24-2, Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) standard strategy and dilated fundus and optic disc evaluation using 78/90 Diopter (D) lens.

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) was diagnosed in cases with IOP recorded >21 mmHg at any point at the time of diagnosis, associated with characteristic signs of glaucomatous optic nerve damage (enlarged disc cupping, focal/diffuse neuro retinal thinning/pallor, retinal nerve fibre layer defects, splinter haemorrhages etc.,) which was consistent with reproducible (atleast two) corresponding typical glaucomatous visual field defects and open angle on gonioscopy [12].

Sample size calculation: The minimum sample size calculated was 44, based on the reference study by de Oliveira AP and Kasahara N, [13] using the formula n=(Z1-α/2)2×σ22×μ2). (Z1-α/2) represents the ‘z’ quantile association with 1-α level of confidence. The ‘z’ quantile for 95% confidence interval is 1.96. The mean OPP fluctuation was taken from the reference study, where Mean (μ)-4.0, SD (σ)-2.7, Relative precision (ε)-5%, Confidence Interval (CI)-95%.

Subjects were further categorised based on the severity of glaucoma into early, moderate and severe based on the Hodapp Parish Anderson criteria [14]. The BP and IOP of subjects were recorded during a 24 hour period of hospital stay, with all measurements taken every 4th hourly (4.00 AM, 8.00 AM, 12.00 PM, 4.00 PM, 8.00 PM and 12.00 AM) by the same examiner. Simultaneous measurement of Systolic BP (SBP) and Diastolic BP (DBP) were taken in the right upper arm in sitting position using the mercury sphygmomanometer. In the awake state, measurement of BP was taken after the patient had been seated for atleast 5 minutes, according to the protocol used in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [15]. IOP was then measured by GAT after the subject had been seated at the slit lamp for atleast 5 minutes. During the sleep period, patients were awakened and seated for at least 5 minutes and measurements were taken as elaborated above. All patients were asked to refrain from any physical activity that could affect BP during the hospital stay. The IOP of the affected eye was chosen in unilateral cases, while in bilateral cases, the worse eye was chosen.

The MAP was calculated as DBP +1/3 (SBP–DBP) while MOPP was calculated using the standardised formula MOPP=2/3×MAP-IOP. SOPP was calculated as SOPP=SBP-IOP, and DOPP was expressed as DOPP=DBP-IOP [16]. Nocturnal MAP was calculated as the average of MAP values taken from 8.00 PM to 4.00 AM the following day, and diurnal MAP was calculated as the average of MAP measurements from 8.00 AM to 4.00 PM. Nocturnal MAP and diurnal MAP fluctuation were calculated as the highest minus the lowest MAP value within each period. Nocturnal and diurnal SOPP, DOPP and MOPP fluctuations were calculated in the same manner. Twenty four-hour MOPP fluctuation was calculated as peak MOPP minus trough MOPP.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages while continuous variables are expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Correlation of OPP with age and severity of the disease was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariate Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test. All statistical analysis was done using the SPSS version 16.0. The normality of data was checked in SPSS using the Shapiro Wilk test.

Results

A total of 44 subjects were recruited for the study of which females constituted 43.2%. The mean age was 56.84±9.2 years. The cohort included 15 cases in early stage, 12 cases in moderate stage and 17 cases in severe stage with mean age of 49.4±8.9 years, 55.8±9.4 years and 64.3±4.3 years, respectively [Table/Fig-1].

Distribution of age and sex.

SexAge in yearsTotal
<60>60
N%N%N%
Male1354.212602556.8
Female1145.88401943.2
Total241002010044100

The mean SBP, DBP and MAP recorded were 123.22±10.02 mmHg, 77.46±6.42 mmHg and 92.67±6.91 mmHg [Table/Fig-2] and the mean diurnal and the mean nocturnal MAP fluctuations were 3.12±3.33 mmHg and 5.88±3.82 mmHg, respectively [Table/Fig-3]. The mean IOP in 36 out of 44 cases ranged between 20 to 25 mmHg, the mean IOP fluctuation being 2.55±2.1 mmHg.

Mean of parameters.

ParametersMean (mmHg)SD
SBP123.2210.02
DBP77.466.42
MAP92.676.91
IOPPeak24.142.23
Trough21.592.34
SOPP100.329.63
DOPP54.575.89
MOPP46.524.37

SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; IOP: Intraocular pressure; SOPP: Systolic ocular perfusion pressure; DOPP: Diastolic ocular perfusion pressure; MOPP: Mean ocular perfusion pressure


Correlation of parameters with glaucoma severity using Pearson correlation.

ParametresGlaucoma severityrp-value
Early (N=15)Moderate (N=12)Severe (N=17)Total
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMean
IOP fluctuation1.800.841.921.103.652.882.55±2.10.4150.520
Mean IOP22.991.7022.431.6823.112.2922.8±1.90.0320.883
Mean SBP120.708.46125.5311.79123.8110.08123.2±10.020.1280.405
Mean DBP76.954.7177.897.9077.626.9377.46±6.420.0430.781
Mean MAP91.205.4193.607.7993.327.6192.67±6.90.1290.720
MAP diurnal fluctuation1.401.343.474.034.393.563.12±3.330.2530.330
MAP nocturnal fluctuation2.331.736.413.528.642.815.88±3.820.533<0.001
SOPP diurnal fluctuation2.122.452.742.333.832.552.26±2.550.0420.788
SOPP nocturnal fluctuation2.721.464.822.5311.22.574.24±3.60.835<0.001
DOPP diurnal fluctuation1.651.22.432.454.262.372.95±2.510.3580.17
DOPP nocturnal fluctuation2.21.415.262.2510.712.53.9±2.80.768<0.001
MOPP diurnal fluctuation1.330.752.512.513.061.992.32±1.960.2320.130
MOPP nocturnal fluctuation2.271.345.612.349.242.015.87±3.530.685<0.001
MOPP 24 hr fluctuation2.871.236.502.6210.292.236.72±3.780.636<0.001

Fluctuations in IOP showed no significant correlation with age (p-value=0.12) or severity of glaucoma (p-value=0.52). Nocturnal MAP fluctuation, however, showed positive correlation with age (p<0.001, r=0.447) and severity of glaucoma (p<0.001, r=0.533) [Table/Fig-3,4].

Correlation of parameters with age using Pearson correlation.

ParametersMeanrp-value
IOP fluctuation2.55±2.10.3770.12
MAP diurnal fluctuation3.12±3.330.2840.071
MAP nocturnal fluctuation5.88±3.820.447<0.001
SOPP diurnal fluctuation2.26±2.550.1180.446
SOPP nocturnal fluctuation4.24±3.60.577<0.001
DOPP diurnal fluctuation2.95±2.510.2010.190
DOPP nocturnal fluctuation3.9±2.80.481<0.001
MOPP diurnal fluctuation2.32±1.960.0570.712
MOPP nocturnal fluctuation5.87±3.530.557<0.001
MOPP 24 Hour fluctuation6.72±3.780.510<0.001

The 24 hour SOPP profile showed a dip in its values at 4.00 AM in 19 cases and 8.00 AM in 10 cases as shown in [Table/Fig-5]. The 24 hour DOPP profile showed a nocturnal dip in its values at 12.00 AM in 21 cases and 4.00 AM in 16 cases as shown in [Table/Fig-5]. The diurnal fluctuations of both SOPP and DOPP did not show any correlation with age or severity of glaucoma. The nocturnal SOPP fluctuations however showed significant positive correlation with age (p<0.001, r=0.577) and severity of glaucoma (p<0.001, r=0.835). The nocturnal DOPP fluctuations too showed significant positive correlation, with age (p<0.001, r=0.481) and more so with severity of glaucoma (p<0.001, r=0.768). [Table/Fig-3,4].

Distribution of time of trough of SOPP, DOPP and MOPP.

The 24 hour MOPP profile also showed a nocturnal dip at 12.00 AM in 20 cases and 4.00 AM in 15 cases as shown in [Table/Fig-5].

Diurnal MOPP fluctuation did not show any significant correlation while nocturnal MOPP fluctuation showed significant correlation with age (p<0.001, r=0.557) and severity of disease (p<0.001, r=0.685) [Table/Fig-6].

Correlation of MOPP with age and Glaucoma severity using Pearson Correlation.

MOPPAgeGlaucoma severity
≥60 y<60 yTotalrpEarlyModerateSevereTotalrp
Diurnal fluctuation2.7±2.21.9±1.62.3±1.90.0570.7121.3±0.72.5±2.53.0±1.92.3±1.90.2320.130
Nocturnal fluctuation7.9±3.14.1±2.85.8±3.50.557<0.0012.27±1.35.61±2.39.2±205.8±3.50.685<0.001
24 hr fluctuation9.0±3.44.7±2.96.7±3.70.510<0.0012.8±1.26.5±2.610.2±2.26.7±3.70.636<0.001

On multivariate analysis [Table/Fig-7], the correlation of the nocturnal parameters (fluctuation in MAP, SOPP, DOPP and MOPP) and 24 hour MOPP fluctuation with age were not found to be statistically significant. On the other hand, their correlation with severity of glaucoma remained statistically significant (p<0.001). The diurnal parameters did not show any significant correlation with age or severity of glaucoma.

Multivariate analysis using ANOVA test.

SourceDependent variableType III sum of squaresdfMean squareFp
AgeNocturnal MAP fluctuation39.219139.2196.1150.018
Nocturnal SOPP fluctuation2.43612.4360.4800.493
Nocturnal DOPP fluctuation0.60210.6020.1250.726
Nocturnal MOPP9.24919.2492.6310.113
24 hour MOPP fluctuation12.802112.8023.3050.077
Severity of glaucomaNocturnal MAP fluctuation142.068271.03411.075<0.001
Nocturnal SOPP fluctuation439.7262219.86343.274<0.001
Nocturnal DOPP fluctuation370.8062185.40338.496<0.001
Nocturnal MOPP210.1302105.06529.888<0.001
24 hour MOPP fluctuation249.8852124.94332.254<0.001

Discussion

In present study, the mean IOP in 36 out of 44 cases ranged between 20 to 25 mmHg with the mean IOP fluctuation being 2.55±2.1 mmHg. Similar results were also noted by de Oliveira AP and Kasahara N., [13]. The role of IOP fluctuations in glaucoma progression remains controversial. A study by Asrani S et al., using self-tonometry had found strong association between diurnal and short term IOP fluctuations in glaucoma progression [17], while studies in ocular hypertensives and normal tension glaucoma have shown contradicting results [18,19]. No significant association of IOP fluctuations and severity of glaucoma were found in present study. Factors such as variations in the study population, criteria used to define progression, the time and type of tonometry and data analysis might have contributed to these differences.

The mean values of SBP, DBP and MAP in present study were similar to the study by Sung KR et al., although the mean diurnal and nocturnal MAP fluctuation were less pronounced [16]. Significant association of nocturnal MAP fluctuations with severity of glaucoma was noted in present study. Sung KR et al., too, reported similar results with greater nocturnal MAP fluctuations in their study group with visual field progression [16].

The SOPP in POAG showed conflicting observations. In present study, majority (>50% cases) had SOPP more than 100 mmHg. In the Singapore Malay Eye Study [20] however, higher values (mean 134.5±24.6 mmHg) were observed in glaucoma while the Barbados Eye study [21], reported patients with lower mean SOPP (<101.3 mmHg) to have increased relative risk of developing POAG. Low SOPP was also reported to be a predictor for glaucoma progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) [9,22].

The DOPP values in 25 out of 44 cases were in the range 50-60 mmHg. Low DOPP has been implicated as a risk factor for glaucoma in numerous population based studies [9,21,23-24]. These studies, in line with the Egna-Neumarkt Study [25] have proposed a strong association with DOPP values <55 mmHg. However in many of these studies the results were not adjusted for glaucoma medications or anti-hypertensive treatment.

The mean of MOPP observed in present study were found to be lower than the Singapore Malay Eye Study [19], (51.6±10.2), which also reported high risk of glaucoma with DBP, MOPP or DOPP values in the lowest quartile. Another study [26] on the other hand, have shown no significant association of the amplitude of MOPP with glaucoma severity.

The circadian patterns of OPP also have shown a great deal of variation. For example, in a study by Costa VP et al., [27] the 24 hr OPP profile revealed higher mean SOPPs during the morning hours (08:00 AM and 10:00 AM) while in present study the lowest SOPP were noted in the early morning hours. In present study significant association was found between nocturnal SOPP fluctuation and severity of glaucoma. Sung KR et al., too had reported greater SOPP fluctuation in their study group, but diurnal and nocturnal fluctuations were not assessed separately [16].

The circadian pattern of DOPP in present study, with trough occurring during midnight to early morning hours has been reported consistently with many studies [28-30]. In general, DOPP curves have shown to correlate well with the BP curves. In present study, nocturnal DOPP fluctuation was found to show significantly correlation with severity of glaucoma while diurnal DOPP fluctuations did not show any significant. Sung KR et al., again had observed greater DOPP fluctuations in their group, but had not assessed diurnal and nocturnal fluctuations separately [16].

The 24 hour MOPP fluctuation was found to be the most consistent prognostic factor in glaucoma progression reported by many studies [10,11,26]. The present study showed significant correlation not only of 24 hour MOPP fluctuation, but also of the nocturnal MOPP fluctuation, with the severity of glaucoma. The MOPP rhythm has been observed to be closely related to the 24 hour BP curve, rather than the IOP curve. This implied that IOP changes hardly affect OPP changes [26].

The above results imply nocturnal dip in OPP, especially in advanced POAG raising a role of haemodynamic factors in the progression of POAG. These observations can further be extrapolated to prevent nocturnal hypotension especially in hypertensive patients by appropriate drug scheduling and tailoring of pharmacotherapy.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of present study included the relatively small sample size and the absence of a normal age matched control group to compare the different variables. As 24 hour hospitalisation of normal subjects (as controls) with 4th hourly measurements of IOP and BP, disrupting their sleep rhythm, had its own ethical and feasibility concerns, authors could not get ready volunteers. Both BP and IOP recordings were measured in the sitting position after waking the patients from sleep, disrupting the prevailing physiological state. Use of automated 24 hour ambulatory monitoring devices would be ideal for recording the measurements without such fallacies.

Conclusion(s)

The 24 hour circadian variation of OPP in POAG showed a nocturnal dip in all OPP parameters (systolic, diastolic as well as Mean OPP), which showed a significant correlation with the severity of the disease in most of the patients. The findings hence support the incorporation of OPP evaluation in the clinical evaluation and management of glaucoma.

SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; IOP: Intraocular pressure; SOPP: Systolic ocular perfusion pressure; DOPP: Diastolic ocular perfusion pressure; MOPP: Mean ocular perfusion pressure

References

[1]Moore D, Harris A, Wudunn D, Kheradiya N, Siesky B, Dysfunctional regulation of ocular blood flow: A risk factor for glaucoma? Clin Ophthalmol 2008 2(4):849-61.10.2147/OPTH.S277419668439  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Wilson MR, Martone J, Epidemiology of chronic open angle glaucoma. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, editors The Glaucomas 1996 1st edSt LouisMosby:725-53.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Omoti AE, Enock ME, Okeigbemen VW, Akpe BA, Fuh UC, Vascular risk factors for open angle glaucoma in African eyes Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2009 16:146-50.10.4103/0974-9233.5622920142982  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Deokule S, Weinreb RN, Relationships among systemic blood pressure, intraocular pressure, and open-angle glaucoma Can J Ophthalmol 2008 43(3):302-07.10.3129/i08-06118493272  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Hayreh SS, Blood flow in the optic nerve head and factors that may influence it Prog Retin Eye Res 2001 20(5):595-624.10.1016/S1350-9462(01)00005-2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]Quaranta L, Katsanos A, Russo A, Riva I, 24-hour intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in glaucoma Surv Ophthalmol 2013 58(1):26-41.10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.05.00323217586  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Caprioli J, Coleman AL, Blood Flow in Glaucoma DiscussionBlood pressure, perfusion pressure, and glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 2010 149(5):704-12.10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.01820399924  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigley HA, Javitt JC, Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma. A population-based assessment Arch Ophthalmol 1995 113(2):216-21.10.1001/archopht.1995.011000201000387864755  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z, EMGT GroupPredictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial Ophthalmology 2007 114(11):1965-72.10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.01617628686  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Choi J, Kim KH, Jeong J, Cho HS, Lee CH, Kook MS, Circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure is a consistent risk factor for normal-tension glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007 48(1):104-11.10.1167/iovs.06-061517197523  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Choi J, Jeong J, Cho HS, Kook MS, Effect of nocturnal blood pressure reduction on circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure: A risk factor for normal tension glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006 47:831-36.10.1167/iovs.05-105316505014  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Bowling B, Kanski’s clinical ophthalmology. A systematic approach 2015 8th edElsevier:349  [Google Scholar]

[13]de Oliveira AP, Kasahara N, Correlation between ocular perfusion pressure fluctuation and glaucoma severity Int Ophthalmol 2015 35:187-92.10.1007/s10792-014-9929-524643517  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR, Clinical decisions in glaucoma 1993 1st edSt LouisThe CV Mosby Co:52-61.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: Objectives and design Am J Epidemiol 2002 156:871-81.10.1093/aje/kwf11312397006  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Sung KR, Lee S, Park SB, Choi J, Kim ST, Yun SC, Twenty-four-hour ocular perfusion pressure fluctuation and risk of normal-tension glaucoma progression Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009 50:5266-74.10.1167/iovs.09-371619474398  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K, Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma J Glaucoma 2000 9:134-42.10.1097/00061198-200004000-0000210782622  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Diurnal IOP fluctuation: Not an independent risk factor for glaucomatous visual field loss in high-risk ocular hypertension Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005 243:513-18.10.1007/s00417-004-1103-815756577  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Daugeliene L, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y, Risk factors for visual field damage in normal tension glaucoma eyes Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999 237:105-08.10.1007/s0041700502039987625  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Zheng Y, Wong TY, Mitchell P, Friedman DS, He M, Aung T, Distribution of ocular perfusion pressure and its relationship with open angle glaucoma: The Singapore Malay Eye Study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010 51:3399-404.10.1167/iovs.09-486720164462  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, Honkanen R, Nemesure B, Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: The Barbados Eye Studies Ophthalmology 2008 115:85-93.10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.01717629563  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M, Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Arch Ophthalmol 2002 120:1268-79.10.1001/archopht.120.10.126812365904  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, Hyman LG, Schachat AP, Risk factors for open angle glaucoma. The Barbados Eye Study Arch Ophthalmol 1995 113:918-24.10.1001/archopht.1995.011000700920317605285  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, Munoz B, Klein R, Snyder R, The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: Proyecto VER Arch Ophthalmol 2001 119:1819-26.10.1001/archopht.119.12.181911735794  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, Bernardi P, Morbio R, Varotto A, Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: The Egna-Neumarkt Study Ophthalmology 2000 107:1287-93.10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00138-X  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[26]Renard E, Palombi K, Gronfier C, Pepin JL, Noel C, Chiquet C, Twenty-four hour (Nyctohemeral) rhythm of intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in normal-tension glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010 51:882-89.10.1167/iovs.09-366819684006  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Costa VP, Jimenez-Roman J, Carrasco FG, Lupinacci A, Harris A, Twenty-four-hour ocular perfusion pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 2010 94:1291-94.10.1136/bjo.2009.16756920516145  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Quaranta L, Gandolfo F, Turano R, Rovida F, Pizzolante T, Musig A, Effects of topical hypotensive drugs on circadian IOP, blood pressure, and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in patients with glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006 47:2917-23.10.1167/iovs.05-125316799034  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Quaranta L, Konstas AGP, Rossetti L, Garcia-Feijoo J, O’Brien C, Nasr MB, Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with perkins applanation tonometry Eye (Lond) 2010 24:1252-58.10.1038/eye.2009.30019960033  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Quaranta L, Miglior S, Floriani I, Pizzolante T, Konstas AG, Effects of the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination and latanoprost on circadian diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008 49:4226-31.10.1167/iovs.08-174418502991  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]