JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/46355.14613
Year : 2021 | Month : Mar | Volume : 15 | Issue : 03 Full Version Page : OC05 - OC08

Bronchodilator Response in Airflow Obstruction after Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis- A Retrospective Analysis

Marina Pires Nishi1, Silvana Spindolade Miranda2, Eduardo Martins Netto3, Eliane Viana Mancuzo4

1 Pneumologist, Department of Pulmonolgy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
2 Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
3 Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bhaia, Brazil.
4 Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Eliane Viana Mancuzo, R Ilacir P Lima 267, Apartment 404, bloc 3 BLOCO 3 APTO 404, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
E-mail: elianevmancuzo4@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) is a risk factor for the development of Obstructive Ventilatory Disorder (OVD). Evaluation of the response to the bronchodilator in patients with OVD, as the exclusive consequence of the PTB sequel, has not been studied.

Aim

To evaluate response of Bronchodilators (BD) in patients treated for PTB with airflow obstruction and without any previous pulmonary diseases or smoking history.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of data (n=60) was done from February 2014 to February 2015, from a previous multicentric study that used 378 participants. There were data of 60 patients without any previous pulmonary diseases, smoking history, and with OVD or OVD with reduced Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). The participants performed spirometry under BD. The BD response was considered positive when an increase in Forced Expiratory Volume in the first divond (FEV1) and/or FVC ≥12% was observed (as a percentage of change from baseline) and ≥200 mL (in absolute values) after administering salbutamol. To verify association between variables and response to BD, the Fisher-Exact Test was performed (p≤0.05 were considered statistically significant). The variables were analysed using SPSS version 22.0.

Results

Of the 59/60 patients that underwent spirometry before and after the use of BD, 13/59 (22.03%) presented a positive response. Among those, 7/59 (11.87%) had FEV1 response, 5/59 (8.47%) FVC response and 1/59 (1.69%) presented a simultaneous response in FEV1 and FVC. Association between socio-demographic, clinical and radiological variables and BD response were not significant.

Conclusion

The response to BD was observed in a quarter of patients with OVD, due to a likely structural change caused by Tuberculosis (TB).

Keywords

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious and transmissible disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis [1]. Although it can be treated, it is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases in adults and is still a global public health problem, reaching millions of people per year, mainly in developing countries [1]. Brazil is part of a group of 30 countries listed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as being of high priority for tackling TB. These countries account for about 90% of the approximately 10.5 million new TB cases that occur each year [2]. PTB is estimated to account for 75% of all TB cases [1].

PTB, as well as smoking, exposure to wood stove smoke, biomass, childhood respiratory tract infections and asthma, have been implicated as risk factors for the development of OVD [3], with smoking being the main one [4]. Approximately, 20% of patients who meet the criteria for airflow obstruction are not smokers, and PTB is considered a possible cause of obstruction [5].

In the lungs, PTB can evolve with destruction of the bronchi and the parenchyma, resulting in scarring, bronchiectasis and fibrosis, which lead to the impairment of lung function, even in adequately treated patients [6]. Functional changes resulting from PTB observed after treatment appear as Restrictive Ventilatory Disorder (RVD), OVD, or Mixed (obstructive-restrictive) Ventilator Disorder (MVD) [3,7,8]. Some studies described that most frequent alteration is OVD [9-12]. However, Santra A et al., showed MVD as the most prevalent (72%) [8]. In Brazil, Maria L et al., observed MVD in 34% and OVD was observed in 34% to 49% by other authors [13-15]. In a multicentre study, without a history of lung disease or smoking prior treatment of PTB, the RVD was the most prevalent (24.7%) [7].

Short-acting BD response, measured by FEV1, in post treatment TB patients, ranged from 7.7 to 21% [16-18]. However, in these studies, individuals with lung disease prior to TB treatment, smokers and former smokers were also included.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the response to bronchodilator in OVD in patients after treatment of PTB without history of smoking or previous lung disease.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study that included data of 60 patients. The data was a part of a larger multicentric study (n=378) that was conducted to compare results from spirometry in patients treated for PTB, with or without previous pulmonary diseases. The detailed methodology of the multicentre study had been previously published [7].

The participants were recruited from February 2014-2015 from the Hospital das Clínicas of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (secondary reference for the treatment of TB); the Brazilian Institute for Tuberculosis Research (IBIT), Salvador, Bahia (primary reference); the University Hospital of the Federal University of Grande Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul (primary reference); and the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (secondary reference). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais: CAAE number 14606113.7.0000.5149.

Inclusion criteria: From the 378 patients in the multicentre study, 60 spirometry results from patients with OVD or OVD with reduced FVC, without previous pulmonary diseases (asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis or silicosis) and without smoking history were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with normal tests, with previous pulmonary disease and smoking history and RVD were excluded [Table/Fig-1].

Flowchart showing the patient distribution.

RVD: Restrictive ventilatory disorder; OVD: Obstructive ventilatory disorder; FVC: Forced vital capacity

Available data were collected from a standardised questionnaire (socio-demographic and clinical data, gender, age, smoking, alcohol consumption and co-morbidities). The time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis of PTB was also assessed. A smoker was considered to be an individual who smoked at least 100 cigarettes or equivalent in his or her lifetime. A former smoker was one whose habit had been discontinued for more than 12 months [19]. In the classification of alcoholism, the CAGE questionnaire was used (CAGE is an acronym referring to four questions: Cut down, Annoyed by criticism, Guilty and Eye-opener) [20].

The diagnosis of pulmonary diseases prior to the treatment of PTB was reviewed by the pulmonologists involved in this study, following the definitions proposed by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for Asthma, Global Initiative for Obstructive Chronic Lung Disease (GOLD) for COPD and Pneumological Practice [4,21,22]. Participants were asked about the occurrence of wheezing in childhood, as well as symptoms of rhinitis and atopic dermatitis.

The presence of cough, sputum, wheezing and dyspnoea (classified according to the scale of the modified Medical Research Council-mMRC) [23] was evaluated on the day of spirometry.

In spirometry, the Koko brand spirometer (Pulmonary Data Service, Inc. Company, Louisville, CO, USA) was used. Acceptance and reproducibility criteria for pulmonary function tests followed the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society [24]. The values found were described as absolute values and as a percentage of the predicted values for the Brazilian population [25]. The technicians who performed the tests were certified by the Brazilian Society of Pulmonology. The tests were performed six months after tuberculosis treatment. In the interpretation of spirometry, the following standards were defined: normal spirometry, OVD, OVD with reduced vital capacity (OVD with reduced VC) and RVD [26]. OVD was considered when the FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio below the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) and the FVC within the LLN. FEV1/FVC ratio and FVC below LLN was considered OVD with reduced FVC. RVD was inferred when FEV1/FVC ratio equal or above LLN and FVC below LLN and clinical and chest radiographs data suggested restriction [26]. To classify the severity of the obstruction in the spirometry, we used a percentage of predicted of FEV1 and FEV1/FVC, with ≥60% mild, 41-59% moderate, and ≤40% severe; for restriction we used percent prediction of FVC ≥60% mild, 51-59% moderate, and ≤50% severe [26]. Salbutamol, 400 μcg, was used as a bronchodilator during the tests. The bronchodilator response was considered positive when observed an increase in FEV1 and/or FVC ≥12% (as a percentage of change from baseline) and ≥200 mL (in absolute values) after administering salbutamol in four separate doses of 100 mcg [27].

Radiological Evaluation

Chest radiographs were performed on dates close to the spirometry, evaluated by radiologists and classified by pulmonologists. Unchanged chest radiographs were classified as normal. For the others, the National Tuberculosis Association (NTA) [28] classification was used: NTA I or minimum; NTA II or moderately advanced. The lesion may be in one or both lungs, its extent should not exceed the volume corresponding to an entire lung if the lesions are not confluent, and, in the presence of confluent lesions, they should not occupy more than the equivalent of one third of the lung; NTA III or very advanced that exceeds the moderate limit.

Statistical Analysis

The variables were entered in a spreadsheet developed in the Excel program and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences program, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The distribution of the variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, while categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequency. To verify the association between socio-demographic, clinical and radiological variables and the response to BD, the Fisher-Exact Test was used. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

A total of 59 patient’s data with OVD, and OVD with reduced FVC, were included in the final analyses [Table/Fig-1]. The socio-demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of the participants are shown in [Table/Fig-2]. There was a higher frequency of males, incomplete primary education and married individuals. The mean age was 47 years. Systemic Arterial Hypertension (SAH) was the most prevalent co-morbidity. Alcoholism was absent in a majority of patients (76.3%). In clinical evaluation, dyspnoea mMRC 0-1 (91.5%) was the most frequent symptom. In the radiological evaluation, a majority of participants (66.1%) presented little or no alteration after treatment. The mean time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of TB was three months.

Clinical, socio-demographic and radiological characteristics.

CharacteristicFeaturesn%
GenderMale3254.2
Female2745.8
Age range (in years)18-291220.3
30-492237.3
50-591118.6
60 and above1423.8
Race/colourWhite711.9
Non-white5288.1
Schooling (a)Complete or incomplete elementary education2949.2
High school or higher education1627.1
Marital status (b)Married/Stable union3152,5
Others2745.8
AlcoholismcYes1322.0
No4576.3
Co-morbiditiesHIV23.4
Hypertension1220.3
Cardiopathy11.7
Diabetes mellitus23.4
Kidney disease46.8
Respiratory symptomsDegree of dyspnea, mMRC 0-15491.5
Cough1627.1
Sputum915.3
Wheezing35.1
NTA classification (d)Normal or NTA-I3966.1
NTA II or III1525.4
Time of symptoms until diagnosis (e)<30 days1220.3
30 days or more3762.7

*mean±standard deviation, mMRC: modified medical research council; NTA: National tuberculosis association; a: n=14, no available data; b: n=1, no available data; c: n=1, no available data; d: n=5, no available data; e: n=10, no available data


The absolute and percentage predicted values obtained in spirometry before and after BD are presented in [Table/Fig-3]. In spirometry, mild OVD was observed in 61.02% of the patients, followed by moderate OVD with reduced FVC in 20.3% [Table/Fig-4].

Spirometric variables (n=59).

ParameterMean (SD)Mean (SD) % of predicted
FVC (L)3.3 (1.1)83.8 (17.6)
FVC-BD (L)3.4 (1.1)84.7 (18.7)
FEV1 (L)2.3 (0.8)70.9 (19.9)
FEV1-BD (L)2.5 (0.9)74.8 (19.7)
FEV1/FVC %69.2 (7.5)

SD: Standard deviation; L: Litre; FVC: forced vital capacity; FVC-BD: Forced vital capacity after use of the bronchodilator; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in the first second; FEV1-BD: Forced expiratory volume after use of the bronchodilator; FEV1/FVC%: ratio forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity in % of predicted


Classification of the seriousness of ventilatory disorder.

Disordern%Graden%
OVD4169.5Mild3661.02
Moderate46.8
Severe11.7
OVD with reduced CVF1830.5Mild46.8
Moderate1220.3
Severe23.38
Total5910059100

OVD: Obstructive ventilatory disorder; FVC: Forced vital capacity


In the results of spirometry after BD use, 13/59 (22.03%) of the patients presented a positive response, which was evidenced in FEV1 in 7/59 (11.9%), and FVC in 5/59 (8.5%). Only 1/59 (1.7%) of the patients presented a confirmed response in FEV1 and FVC simultaneously [Table/Fig-5].

Bronchodilator response in the spirometry (n=59).

Bronchodilator responsen%
FVC58.47
FEV1711.87
FVC and FEV111.69
Total1322.03

FVC: Forced vital capacity; FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in the first second


After Fisher-Exact Test analysis, no significant associations between socio-demographic, clinical and radiological variables, and BD response were observed [Table/Fig-6].

Associated factors for the bronchodilator response.

Variables of study subjectsFeaturesResponse to BDp-value
NoYes
n=46n=13
n%n%
GenderMale2554.3753.80.97
Female2145.7646.2
Age rangeUp to 29 years1021.7215.40.56
30-49 years1634.8646.2
50-59 years1021.717.7
60 years and above1021.7430.8
BMI, Kg/m2<253780.4969.20.39
≥25919.6430.8
Race/colorWhite510.9215.40.65
Non-white4189.11184.6
SchoolingComplete or incomplete elementary education2363.9666.70.88
High school or higher education1336.1333.3
Marital statusMarried/Stable union2657.8538.50.22
Others1942.2861.5
Alcoholism Yes1021.7325.00.81
No3678.3975.0
Respiratory symptomsDegree of dyspnea: mMRC 0-14495.71090.90.48
Cough1226.1433.3
Sputum510.9433.3
Wheezing36.500.0
NTA classification*Normal or NTA-I3173.8866.70.63
NTA II or III1126.2433.3
Time of symptoms until diagnosis<30 days923.1330.00.65
>30 days3076.9770.0

BMI: Body mass index; llll; mMRC: modified medical research council; NTA: National tuberculosis association; *n=5 NTA no available data: 4 without BD and 1 BD response; Fischer exact test used to calculate the significance; p-value<0.05 to be considered the significance level


Discussion

The main findings of this study, conducted in three regions of Brazil, showed that 13/59 (22.03%) of the participants with airflow obstruction after PTB treatment presented a positive response to bronchodilator in spirometry. It should be noted that patients with a history of lung disease or smoking prior to treatment of PTB were excluded.

The pathophysiology leading to the development of airflow obstruction in PTB is multifactorial in nature [3,6]. Endobronchial involvement may result in localised and diffuse bronchial obstruction, fibrosis, and increased airway resistance. Parenchymal lung destruction may also affect lung compliance, resulting in an increased tendency for peripheral airway collapse and subsequent air entrapment [6]. Thus, the outcome will be a compromised lung function, evolving into airflow obstruction [3,29]. The BD response in patients with treated PTB may be justified by their performance in the mechanisms involved in obstruction, such as mucosal oedema, hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the mucous glands, increased secretion of mucus and hypertrophy of the smooth muscle which alters the airway caliber, increases its resistance and reduces airflow [3,6].

In addition to factors associated with infection, individual characteristics (such as those related to genetics, systemic inflammatory response, and initial extent of PTB lesions) are involved in airflow obstruction [30]. A recent study indicated association of the Matrix-Metalloproteinase (MMP) system in the remodeling mechanisms of pulmonary Extracellular Matrix (ECM), which contributes to the development of airflow obstruction in TB [6]. MMPs play important roles in normal lung immunity. However, in diseased, inflamed or remodeling and repair tissues, these are expressed in excess, which may contribute to the emergence of destructive pulmonary diseases, and proteolytic activity leading to the degradation of the lung ECM [31]. This heterogeneity of lesions affecting the lung should be better studied, especially in relation to pathophysiology and inflammatory phenomena.

In the index study, there was a greater predominance of OVD in relation to OVD with reduced FVC, 69.5% versus 30.5%, respectively, with OVD being the most frequent. Sailaja K and Rao HN also found similar results in their series, with OVD being 62.5% and mixed pattern abnormalities 21.42%; however, the pattern of moderate obstructive abnormalities was the most frequent [32].

In the present study, a positive response to BD was observed in 22.03% of the patients, which is close to the variation described in the literature, from 14 to 21% [16-18]. However, different from what had been observed in previous studies, smokers, ex-smokers and those with other pulmonary diseases prior to the treatment of PTB were excluded, thus reducing confounding factors in the results and reinforcing that the response to BD was probably related to airflow obstruction by the PTB. The therapeutic effect of BD in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD) manifests itself clinically, with a significant improvement in dyspnea due to decreased resistance of small airways and pulmonary hyper-inflation, increasing exercise capacity and improving quality of life [4].

Limitation(s)

The limitation present in this study is the restricted number of participants that were included.

Conclusion(s)

Response to BD was observed in a quarter of patients with OVD who were treated by PTB and without previous pulmonary diseases or smoking history, is likely due to a structural change. The specific treatment of these patients should be studied in future studies.

Future studies should investigate the medium and long-term benefits of BD in the clinical and functional improvement of these patients. Studies should be performed in order to verify if this same mechanism occurs in airflow obstruction post PTB.

*mean±standard deviation, mMRC: modified medical research council; NTA: National tuberculosis association; a: n=14, no available data; b: n=1, no available data; c: n=1, no available data; d: n=5, no available data; e: n=10, no available dataSD: Standard deviation; L: Litre; FVC: forced vital capacity; FVC-BD: Forced vital capacity after use of the bronchodilator; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in the first second; FEV1-BD: Forced expiratory volume after use of the bronchodilator; FEV1/FVC%: ratio forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity in % of predictedOVD: Obstructive ventilatory disorder; FVC: Forced vital capacityFVC: Forced vital capacity; FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in the first secondBMI: Body mass index; llll; mMRC: modified medical research council; NTA: National tuberculosis association; *n=5 NTA no available data: 4 without BD and 1 BD response; Fischer exact test used to calculate the significance; p-value<0.05 to be considered the significance level

References

[1]World Health Organisation. Estimated incidence, prevalence and TB mortality. [Accessed 10 May November 2018]. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/  [Google Scholar]

[2]Manual De Recomendações Para O Controle Da Tuberculose No Brasil [Internet]. 2019. Available from: http://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2019/marco/25/manual-recomendacoes-tb-20mar19-isbn.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[3]Sarkar M, Srinivasa Madabhavi I, Kumar K, Tuberculosis associated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Clin Respir J 2017 11(3):285-95.10.1111/crj.1262128268242  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]GOLD. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive. Glob Obstr Lung Dis [Internet]. 2018;http://www.goldcopd.org. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2015_Apr2.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[5]Amaral AFS, Coton S, Kato B, Tan WC, Studnicka M, Janson C, Tuberculosis associates with both airflow obstruction and low lung function: BOLD results Eur Respir J [Internet] 2015 46(4):1104-12.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02325-201410.1183/13993003.02325-201426113680  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Ravimohan S, Kornfeld H, Weissman D, Bisson GP, Tuberculosis and lung damage: From epidemiology to pathophysiology Eur Respir Rev [Internet] 2018 27(147)Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0077-201710.1183/16000617.0077-201729491034  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Mancuzo EV, Martins Netto E, Sulmonett N, Viana VS, Croda J, Kritski AL, Spirometry results after treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis: Comparison between patients with and without previous lung disease: A multicenter study J Bras Pneumol 202 46(2):e2018019810.36416/1806-3756/e2018019832130330  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Santra A, Dutta P, Manjhi R, Pothal S, Clinico-radiologic and spirometric profile of an Indian population with post-tuberculous obstructive airway disease J Clin Diagnostic Res 2017 11(3):OC35-38.10.7860/JCDR/2017/24555.952928511433  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Allwood BW, Myer L, Bateman ED, A systematic review of the association between pulmonary tuberculosis and the development of chronic airflow obstruction in adults Respiration 2013 86(1):76-85.10.1159/00035091723652030  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Chushkin MI, Ots ON, Comprometimento da função pulmonar apís tratamento para tuberculose: o resultado final da doença? J Bras Pneumol 2017 43(1):38-43.  [Google Scholar]

[11]De La Mora IL, Martínez-Oceguera D, Laniado-Laborín R, Chronic airway obstruction after successful treatment of tuberculosis and its impact on quality of life Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015 19(7):808-10.10.5588/ijtld.14.098326056106  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Powers M, Sanchez TR, Welty TK, Cole SA, Oelsner EC, Yeh F, Lung function and respiratory symptoms after tuberculosis in an American indian population the strong heart study Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020 17(1):38-48.10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-281OC31553638  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Maria L, Ramos M, Sulmonett N, Ferreira CIDS, Henriques JF, Miranda SSDE, Artigo Original J Bras Pneumol 2006 32(1):43-47.10.1590/S1806-3713200600010001017273568  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Di Naso FC, Pereira JS, Schuh SJ, Unis G, Functional evaluation in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis sequelae Rev Port Pneumol 2011 17(5):216-21.10.1016/j.rppneu.2011.06.01021803536  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Nihues S de SE, Mancuzo EV, Sulmonetti N, Sacchi FPC, de Souza Viana V, Netto EM, Chronic symptoms and pulmonary dysfunction in post-tuberculosis Brazilian patients Brazilian J Infect Dis 2015 19(5):492-97.10.1016/j.bjid.2015.06.00526254689  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Lee JH, Chang JH, Lung function in patients with chronic airflow obstruction due to tuberculous destroyed lung Respir Med 2003 97(11):1237-42.10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00255-5  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[17]Yum HK, Park IN, Effect of inhaled tiotropium on spirometric parameters in patients with tuberculous destroyed lung Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2014 77(4):167-71.10.4046/trd.2014.77.4.16725368662  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Gupte AN, Paradkar M, Selvaraju S, Thiruvengadam K, Shivakumar SVBY, Sekar K, Assessment of lung function in successfully treated tuberculosis reveals high burden of ventilatory defects and COPD PLoS One 2019 14(5):01-18.10.1371/journal.pone.021728931120971  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation- United States MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009 58(44):1227-32.Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=105342903&site=ehost-live  [Google Scholar]

[20]Masur J, Monteiro MG, Validation of the “CAGE” alcoholism screening test in a Brazilian psychiatric inpatient hospital setting Brazilian J Med Biol Res= Rev Bras Pesqui medicas e Biol 1983 16(3):215-18.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Page PM, Broek JL, Bousquet J, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bonini S, Canonica GW, GINA 2017 Guidelines Glob Initiat Asthma 2017 126(3)http://ginasthma.org/2017-gina-report-global-strat  [Google Scholar]

[22]Maciel R AM, Prática Pneumolígica. Segunda Ed. Maciel R AM, editor 2017 Rio de Janeiro:21-747.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Fletcher CM, Standardised questionnaire on respiratory symptoms: A statement prepared and approved by the MRC Committee on the Aetiology of Chronic Bronchitis (MRC breathlessness score) BMJ 1960 2:1662PMCID: PMC2098438  [Google Scholar]

[24]Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Standardisation of spirometry Eur Respir J 2005 26:319-38.10.1183/09031936.05.0003480516055882  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Pereira CAC, Sato T, Rodrigues SC, Novos valores de referência para espirometria forçada em brasileiros adultos de raça branca J Bras Pneumol 2007 33(4):397-406.10.1590/S1806-3713200700040000817982531  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Pereira CAC, Neder JA, Diretrizes para testes de função pulmonar J Bras Pneumol 2002 28(3):S1-238.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Interpretative strategies for lung function tests Eur Respir J 2005 26(5):948-68.10.1183/09031936.05.0003520516264058  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Cruz RC, De Albuquerque MF, Campelo AR, Costa e Silva EJ, Mazza E, Menezes RC, Pulmonary tuberculosis: association between extent of the residual pulmonary lesion and alteration in the lung function [Article in Portuguese] Rev Assoc Med Bras 2008 54(5):406-10.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-4230200800050001210.1590/S0104-4230200800050001218989560  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Byrne AL, Marais BJ, Mitnick CD, Lecca L, Marks GB, Tuberculosis and chronic respiratory disease: A systematic review Int J Infect Dis [Internet] 2015 32:138-46.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.01610.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.01625809770  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Radovic M, Ristic L, Ciric Z, Dinic-Radovic V, Stankovic I, Pejcic T, Changes in respiratory function impairment following the treatment of severe pulmonary tuberculosis - limitations for the underlying COPD detection Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis [Internet] 2016 11(1):1307-16.Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/changes-in-respiratory-function-impairment-following-the-treatment-of--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPD10.2147/COPD.S10687527366058  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Elkington P, Shiomi T, Breen R, Nuttall RK, Ugarte-Gil CA, Walker NF, MMP-1 drives immunopathology in human tuberculosis and transgenic mice J Clin Invest 2011 61(3):259-66.10.1172/JCI4566621519144  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Sailaja K, Rao HN, Study of pulmonary function impairment by spirometry in post pulmonary tuberculosis J Evol Med Dent Sci 2015 4(42):7365-70.10.14260/jemds/2015/1068  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]