JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/47070.14601
Year : 2021 | Month : Mar | Volume : 15 | Issue : 03 Full Version Page : ZC01 - ZC06

Effect of Bleaching with Strawberry Extract and Hydrogen Peroxide on Colour Change, Surface Morphology and Micro-shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Enamel Surface

Rajith Radhakrishnan1, Ravikumar Nesamani2, Kavitha Sanjeev3, Mahalaxmi Sekar4

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
4 Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Kavitha Sanjeev, Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospital, Bharathi Salai, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: researchkavi02@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The search to replace the chemical bleaching agent namely the Hydrogen Peroxide (HP) with a natural substance to whiten the discoloured tooth is a need of the hour, due to the severe roughing and compromised bonding of resin composite to enamel surface by this agent.

Aim

To evaluate and compare the colour and surface changes in enamel surface, and the micro-shear bond strength of resin composite to enamel following bleaching with 35% HP and 2% Strawberry Extract (SE).

Materials and Methods

In this in-vitro study, 30 bovine maxillary central incisors were decoronated and allocated randomly to two groups: group 1 (negative control) (n=15) and group 2 (experimental) (n=15). To evaluate the bleaching efficacy, group 2 specimens were experimentally stained with tea. Baseline colour coordinates (pre-bleach values) (L*, a*, b*) (∆E) were recorded. The crowns were divtioned to obtain four equal parts to obtain 60 specimens and these were allotted randomly to 4 subgroups a, b, c, d (n=15 each) based on the bleaching protocol. Subgroup a, Hydrogen Peroxide (HP). subgroup b, Strawberry Extract (SE); subgroup c, HP+SE (HPS); subgroup d, HP/P (HP/ Proanthocyanidin). Following bleaching, colour coordinates (post-bleach values) (L*, a*, b*) (∆E) were measured as mentioned before. Qualitative analysis of the surface (n=2) for each group was performed using scanning electron microscopy. Micro-shear bond strength of resin composite to the treated specimens (n=13) was determined using universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Kruskal-Wallis one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to calculate the p-value and Post-Hoc Tukey Honest significant Test (HSD) was used to identify the significant groups, p-value (<0.05).

Results

All the post-bleach specimens showed significantly higher mean ∆E (more whiter) values compared to their respective pre-bleach specimens (baseline values) (p-value -<0.05). Among the post-bleach groups, highest ∆E values (more whiter) were observed in subgroup 2c (HPS) (p-value=0.029). Similarly minimal morphological surface irregularities were observed in HPS. Group 1 (negative control) had the highest micro-shear bond strength compared to the experimental groups (group 2). Significantly, higher micro-shear bond strength was observed in subgroups 2b,c,d (SE, HPS, HPP) compared to subgroup 2a (HP) (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion

SE alone or in combination with HP is an efficient and effective dental bleaching agent.

Keywords

Introduction

The desire for whiter teeth among the general population has reached an all-time high with many individuals seeking professional help for non-invasive bleaching techniques. Despite various potential side-effects of peroxide, it has remained the active ingredient in tooth whitening agents in the form of HP and carbamide peroxide [1]. There is evidence to show that 35% HP results in shallow erosions, sensitivity, structural alterations in enamel structure and compromised bonding of resin composite [2,3].

Attempts to minimise these adverse effects by incorporating remineralising agents, calcium and fluoride substitutes, the results have met with limited success [4]. Furthermore, compromised bonding of adhesive restorations to bleached teeth is an important clinical concern. The use of antioxidants and proanthocyanidins appear to completely neutralise the deleterious effects of bleaching and increases the micro-shear bond strength significantly [5-8]. However, it is important to note that these adjunct treatments were unable to reverse the structural damage of enamel surface caused by the bleaching agent [9].

Recently there has been an upsurge in usage of natural substances for treatment of various diseases as they minimise or prevent the side effects [10,11]. Similarly, this has led to a constant search for replacing the existing chemicals in cosmetic dentistry used for various purposes. This change would be welcomed in dentistry if there is an alternative for HP due to its various adverse effects on the enamel surface.

Strawberry (fragaria spp.) a herbaceous perennial fruit plant belonging to the family “Rosaceae” is grown in many countries. Apart from its various benefits exerted on the well-being of an individual, it is been noted for its natural tooth whitening potential due to its low pH and presence of various constituents namely citric and malic acid as stated by Chacko K et al., in (2018) and Aub M (2010) [10,12].

However, it remains unknown if SE, alone or in combination with HP can achieve the same bleaching effect as HP alone, without the disadvantages of HP such as surface erosion and compromised bonding of resins. Hence, this study was designed to comparatively investigate the effect of SE, with and without HP on the bleaching effectiveness, surface characteristics and micro-shear bond strength of resin composite to bovine enamel and to compare these results with HP bleached enamel, treated with proanthocyanidin to determine its effects on the bleached enamel. The null hypotheses were that: (1) SE does not significantly improve bleaching, compared to HP alone; and (2) SE does not improve the micro-shear bond strength of resin composite to enamel.

Materials and Methods

This invitro study was conducted in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SRM Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The study was started in January 2013 and was conducted over a time period of nine months. Study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee of the University. (SRMU/M&HS/SRMDC/2013/M.D.S/PG/304). Bleaching efficacy and micro-shear bond strength of SE was evaluated. Using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22 with power of 80% and alpha error 5%, the sample size was calculated.

Preparation of Experimental Solutions

The fresh pulpy strawberry was procured from the market (Chennai). A 200 gm of strawberry fruits were cleaned, cut into cubes and blended with 15 mL of distilled water in a blender to obtain about 100 mL of strawberry concentrate. This concentrate was filtered and then transferred into a cooling centrifuge to be processed at 2000 rpm for about 20 minutes at a temperature of 40C. The clear liquid thus collected (2% SE) was stored at 4oC till further use. Similarly, 5 gm of grape seed extract in the form of powder was collected from capsule (Puritans Pride Inc, Oakdale, NY, USA) and dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water to obtain 5% proanthocyanidin solution (P) [Table/Fig-1,2,3 and 4] [13].

35% Hydrogen peroxide.

Strawberry and Strawberry concentrate.

Centrifuge and Strawberry concentrate in centrifuge machine.

Proanthocyanidin powder and Solution.

Specimen Collection

Bovine teeth were used in this study due to similarities with that of human enamel (Nakamichi I et al., 1983) and the ease of obtaining these specimens [14]. The large surface area provided by the bovine teeth enabled us to obtain 4 sections from a single tooth for uniformity of the enamel surface for the groupings. Single rooted, caries free, bovine maxillary central incisor teeth (n=30) were taken (from the butcher’s shop), teeth with fractures, cracks and stains were excluded. The experiments were performed in accordance with the appropriate guidelines [13]. The collected teeth were stored in 0.2% thymol (Aston Fine Chem, Chennai) and kept hydrated until use.

Staining of Teeth and Bleaching Protocol

The teeth were sectioned at the cemento-enamel junction so as to obtain the crown portion and were stored in saline until it was subjected to further experimental procedures. A 15 teeth served as negative control (group 1-N) and did not receive any bleaching procedure nor staining.

The remaining 15 experimental specimens (group-2) were stained artificially based on a previously established protocol as described by Sulieman M et al. A 2 g tea bag (Ranfer Tea, Colombo, Sri Lanka) was suspended in boiling de-ionised water (100 mL) for 5 minutes and then it was cooled down to room temperature. The clear solution [3] followed by straining the solution was used for staining the teeth. Clear tea solution was obtained by straining the solution. The specimens were then immersed in the tea solution for 24 hours, after which they were removed and subjected to reflectance spectrometer (X-Rite Gretag Macbeth, Berlin, Germany) to record the baseline colour variables (pre-bleach) (L*, a*, b*-∆E values). The crowns were then sectioned longitudinally and horizontally to obtain four equal parts (60 specimens) [Table/Fig-5]; each part being randomly allocated to one sub-group (a,b,c,d; n=15 each), depending on the bleaching protocol as stated below [13]. The specimens were mounted on self-curing acrylic resin blocks, exposing only the labial surface.

Bovine teeth sample.

Group 1 (n=15)

Negative control (N)

Group 2 (n=60)

Group 2a (n=15): 35% HP (Thermo fisher scientific India Pvt., Ltd., Mumbai, India)

Group 2b (n=15): 2% SE

Group 2c (n=15): HP+SE (1:1) (HPS)

Group 2d (n=15): HP followed by 5% Proanthocyanidin solution (P) (HPP)

The labial surface of the specimens of group 2 was exposed to the respective bleaching agent for 5 minutes using cotton tip applicator replenishing every minute. The teeth were then rinsed and stored in artificial saliva at room temperature for 24 hours [13]. All the specimens were further subjected to reflectance spectrometer to obtain the post-bleach colour variables L*, a*, b* according to the CIE (Commission Internationale de l’eclairage) L*a*b colour system. The colour change (ΔE) was calculated using the formula [13]:

ΔE={(ΔL*) 2+(Δa*) 2+(Δb*) 2}½, Where L*, a*, b* represents value of colour using hue, value, and chroma

To evaluate the whiteness after bleaching, the colour changes before and after bleaching was taken as an index [13]. All the procedures were performed at room temperature by the same operator under aseptic conditions.

Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis

To analyse the effect of bleaching solutions on the surface morphology of enamel, 2 of 15 specimens of all groups were subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopic analysis (SEM JEOL model, JSE-5610 LV). The specimens were vacuum desiccated first in alcohol (Alpha Chemika Mumbai, India) and subsequently in acetone (Prasol Chemicals Private Limited, Mumbai) and finally sputter-coated with gold (Rare Earth, Mumbai, India). Micrographs were exposed at a magnification of 1000X. The complete labial surface area was scanned and random areas were selected to be scanned for Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images.

Micro-Shear Bond Evaluation

The remaining specimens from each group (n=13) were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, rinsed with water for 20 seconds, and bonded with self-etch adhesive (Adper Easy One, 3M ESPE, Germany). This was followed by composite build-up of 5 mm height and 3 mm diameter using Teflon mold (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE, Dental Products, USA). The enamel composite blocks were sectioned to obtain 1×1 mm sticks [Table/Fig-5] using a low speed diamond disc under water coolant. The enamel-composite interface of the specimen was subjected to shear load using Instron Universal Testing Machine (LR 100K, Lloyd Instruments, Largo, FL, USA) at a cross head speed of 1mm/min. The obtained values were recorded in MPa.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed with SPSS software. (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22). Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey’s test were used to test the statistical significance. The p-value was set at 5%.

Results

The null hypothesis of the study was rejected. The results of colour change and micro-shear bond strength values of this in-vitro study are given in [Table/Fig-6,7,8,9,10 and 11], respectively. SEM image is represented in [Table/Fig-12a-e].

Descriptive statistics comparing the mean and standard deviation of pre-bleach ∆E values for all the group 2 specimens.

GroupsNMeanStd. DevStd.Error95% Confidence interval for meanMinimumMaximum
Lower boundUpper bound
2a (HP)1511.590.330.0811.4011.7711.1012.12
2b (SE)1511.550.430.1111.3111.7911.0012.20
2c (HPS)1511.590.220.0511.4611.7111.2012.10
2d (HPP)1511.670.290.0711.5111.8411.3212.21

HP: Hydrogen peroxide; SE: Strawberry extract; HPS: Hydrogen peroxide and strawberry; HPP: Hydrogen peroxide and proanthocyanidin solution


Descriptive statistics comparing the mean and standard deviation of post-bleach ∆E values for group 2 specimens.

GroupsNMeanStd. DevStd.Error95% Confidence interval for meanMinimumMaximum
Lower boundUpper bound
2a (HP)1519.060.520.1318.7619.3518.0220.10
2b (SE)1518.730.380.0918.5218.9518.0419.56
2c (HPS)1521.132.290.5919.8622.4019.0929.04
2d (HPP)1517.230.460.1216.9717.4916.4817.94

Comparison of the mean and standard deviation of pre and post-bleach ∆E values for group2 specimens. Post-Hoc test was used to identify the significant groups. p-value (<0.05)

GroupsPre-bleach (ΔE values)Post-bleach (ΔE values)Difference (ΔE values)p-value
Mean±SD
2a (HP)11.59±0.3319.06±0.527.47±0.19<0.05
2b (SE)11.55±0.4318.73±0.387.18±0.05
2c (HPS)11.59±0.2221.13±2.209.54±1.98
2d (HPP)11.67±0.2917.23±0.465.56±0.17

Multiple comparison between post bleach mean ∆E values for group 2 specimens.

Dependent variableGroupsMean differencep-value
Delta E(ΔE)p2a (HP)2b (SE)-2.190.100
2c (HPS)-1.300.050*
2d (HPP)-2.170.001*
2b (SE)2c (HPS)0.090.342
2d (HPP)0.021.000
2c (HPS)2d (HPP)-0.080.029*

*p-value (<0.05) are significant


Comparison of mean and standard deviation for micro-shear bond strength values in MPa for all the groups.

GroupsNMeanStd. DevStd. Error95% Confidence interval for meanMinimumMaximum
Lower boundUpper bound
I (N)1336.20380.819930.2274135.708436.699334.7137.51
2a (HP)1327.38541.072730.2975226.737128.033625.3229.10
2b (SE)1329.48771.242960.3447428.736630.238827.3031.51
2c (HPS)1328.61380.971820.2695328.026629.201127.2030.25
2d (HPP)1329.53381.595270.4424528.569830.497927.3233.50

Multiple comparisons of mean micro-shear bond strength values among the experimental groups (MPa). One-way ANOVA was used to calculate the p-value.

(I) Groups(J) GroupsMean difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence interval
Lower boundUpper bound
1(N)2a (HP)8.81846*0.45934<0.001***7.526610.1103
2b (SE)6.71615*0.45934<0.001***5.42438.0080
2c (HPS)7.59000*0.45934<0.001***6.29818.8819
2d (HPP)6.67000*0.45934<0.001***5.37817.9619
2a (HP)1 (N)-8.81846*0.45934<0.001***-10.1103-7.5266
2b (SE)-2.10231*0.45934<0.001***-3.3942-0.8104
2c (HPS)-1.228460.459340.070-2.52030.0634
2d (HPP)-2.14846*0.45934<0.001***-3.4403-0.8566
2b (SE)1(N)-6.71615*0.45934<0.001***-8.0080-5.4243
2a(HP)2.10231*0.45934<0.001***.81043.3942
2c(HPS)0.873850.459340.327-0.41802.1657
2d(HPP)-0.046150.459341.000-1.33801.2457
2c (HPS)1 (N)-7.59000*0.45934<0.001***-8.8819-6.2981
2a (HP)1.228460.459340.070-0.06342.5203
2b (SE)-0.873850.459340.327-2.16570.4180
2d (HPP)-0.920000.459340.277-2.21190.3719
2d (HPP1 (N)-6.67000*0.45934<0.001***-7.9619-5.3781
2a (HP)2.14846*0.45934<0.001***0.85663.4403
2b (SE)0.046150.459341.000-1.24571.3380
2c (HPS)0.920000.459340.277-0.37192.2119

Post-Hoc Tukey HSD was used to identify the significant groups. p-value (<0.05). *** denotes highly significant; HPS: Hydrogen peroxide and strawberry; HPP: Hydrogen peroxide and proanthocyanidin solution


a- Group 1(N) No visible surface changes observed; b- Group 2a (HP) More roughened enamel surface with the presence of few dissolved particles (green arrow); c- Group 2b (SE) Lesser number of irregularities on the enamel surface with few particles (green arrow); d- Group 2c (HPS) Minimal morphological surface irregularities with absence of cracks; e- Group 2d (HPP) Lesser surface irregularities observed with presence of debris (green arrow).

Higher the ∆E values, better is the bleaching efficacy, i.e., more whiter is the tooth. In group 2, post-bleach ∆E values of all the specimens were significantly higher than all the respective ∆E pre-bleach specimens. (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-8].

Among the post-bleach specimens, highest and the lowest ∆E values were observed in-group 2c (HPS); (21.13±2.29) and group 2d (HPP); (17.23±0.46) respectively (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-7].

The SEM micrographs of HP showed more roughened enamel surface with presence of cracks [Table/Fig-12b]. Lesser number of irregularities were observed in group 2b (SE) and 2d (HPP) [Table/Fig-12c,e]. Minimal morphological surface irregularities with absence of cracks were observed in group 2c (HPS) [Table/Fig-12d] which was comparable to the unbleached specimens of group 1 [Table/Fig-12a].

The control (group 1) showed significantly higher micro-shear bond strength (36.20±0.81MPa) compared to the experimental groups 2a (27.38±1.07MPa); 2b (29.48±1.24MPa); 2c (28.61±0.97MPa) and 2d (29.53±1.59MPa) (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-10]. Among the groups, the micro-shear bond strength of group 2a (27.38±1.07 MPa) was significantly lesser than groups 1, 2b and 2d but not significantly different from group 2c (p>0.05) [Table/Fig-11]. Both the antioxidants (strawberry and proanthocyanidin) showed significantly higher micro-shear bond strength compared to 35% H2O2 (p<0.05).

Similarly minimal morphological surface irregularities were observed in HPS. Significantly higher micro-shear bond strength was observed in all the antioxidant group SE, HPS, HPP compared to HP.

Discussion

Hydrogen Peroxide (HP) is the most commonly used dental bleaching agent. Ionic dissociation of HP releases free radicals namely nascent oxygen, per-hydroxyl, hydroxyl radical and superoxide anions [15,16]. These highly reactive radicals disrupt the electron conjugation by breaking down the highly conjugated organic molecules involving carbon, nitrogen and oxygen atoms, into smaller, less pigmented ones, thus changing the absorption energy of the molecule [17]. The consequent shift of the visible absorption spectrum of compound from a longer to a shorter wavelength (a colourless compound) forms the basis of whitening/bleaching action on the substrate. However, the permeability of enamel to small ions (Atkinson HF 1947), results in the formation of peroxide apatite [18]. These residual peroxides interfere with resin polymerisation and adversely affect the micro-shear bond strength of the resin composite when placed immediately [19-21]. Owing to these problems, substances with minimal deleterious effect on the tooth surface are a welcome change in dentistry.

Strawberry, a widely grown hybrid species of genus Fragaria contains phytochemicals such as ellagitannin, agrimoniin, fisetin, and other polyphenols including flavonoids, such as anthocyanins and flavanols; phenolic acids such as hydroxybenzoic acid and hydroxycinnamic acid [12-22]. Several of these compounds are potent antioxidants. Citric acid (885), maleic acid and ellagic acid comprise the acid content [10,12]. In this study, it was demonstrated that SE was able to whiten enamel without altering the surface characteristics, and more importantly, without compromising the bonding of adhesive restorations.

With regards to the bleaching effectiveness, pre-bleaching values of all the groups were not significant, implying equal distribution of specimens within the groups. Post-bleaching delta E values of all the groups were statistically significantly higher compared to the pre-bleach values (p<0.05). Higher the delta E values, better is the stain removal hence more whiter is the surface of the teeth. Thus, post-bleach specimens were more whiter compared to pre-bleach specimens. This suggests that all treatments bleached effectively the tea-stained enamel (more whiter). All treatment groups (post-bleach), showed statistically significant difference in the ∆E values (p<0.05). When comparing the bleaching agents alone, the teeth bleached with SE were as white as compared to HP, i.e., it was not statistically significant (p>0.05), implying that SE had equal bleaching efficacy as the standard HP.

Song and palmer in 2008 have reported that many fruits namely strawberries, lemon, apples, pears etc., contain H2O2 during their metabolism process [23]. Apart from HP, strawberry also has ellagic acid (C14H6O8) possessing potential OH clusters, these clusters is claimed to act as a powerful oxidiser during tooth whitening process. The OH and H radicals gets released from the ellagic acid and reacts with the organic molecules disrupting the electron conjugation, thereby changing the energy absorption by forming smaller organic molecules with lighter colour [24]. OH clusters in ellagic acid compared to carboxylic group (COOH) clusters (present in other acids) have larger electronegativity and breaks easily to react with the organic molecules of the tooth enamel. The more the ellagic acid in a fruit the more effective is the bleaching process. Ellagic acid in strawberries range to around 0.43-4.64 mg/g dry weight compared to only around 0.13 mg/g in other fruits [24]. These can be substantiated with the results obtained in this study. Hence, strawberry seems to be a good alternative for tooth bleaching. Based on these results, our first null hypothesis was rejected.

HP (35%) appears to have a concentration-dependent bleaching effectiveness, which is attributed to higher content of the low molecular weight oxygen free radicals (34.014 g/mol) [23,25]. The similar efficacy of SE as compared to HP may be attributed to its pH (3.27-3.86) and the presence of the acidic components namely ascorbic acid [12]. Ascorbic acid in strawberry may increase the surface energy by removing the surface debris, thereby allowing the citric and maleic acid to penetrate into the tooth surface to remove the surface stains. This may also explain the synergistic colour change in the combination group (HPS). Both peroxide and the acids could have caused disruption of more number of complex stain molecules into smaller simpler molecules making it colourless [1]. Specimens treated with HP followed by proanthocyanidin (HPP) showed the least improvement in ∆E values and the differences were statistically significant compared to HPS (p<0.05). Indeed, this was expected as proanthocyanidin alone have not been reported to have any bleaching activity. It may also be so that the free radical scavenging action of proanthocyanidin, may have hindered the bleaching efficacy of H2O2 [24,26].

This study used SEM to analyse the surface characteristics of bleached enamel. HP has a pH ranging between 4.0-7.5 based on their peroxide concentration. The greater the peroxide concentration, the more acidic is the solution. Enamel demineralisation begins at pH less than 5.2, and thus, high concentrations of HP could have caused enamel erosion [25-28]. SEM images of the groups treated with HP or HPP showed significant surface roughness [Table/Fig-12b,e]. Interestingly, specimens where HPS was used did not show significant surface roughness [Table/Fig-12d].

Natural antioxidants occur in all parts of plants. The phytochemicals namely phenolics, anthocyanins and other flavonoids that are present in plant tissues are responsible for the antioxidant capacity [21,27,29]. Wang SY and Lin HS, has stated that extracts of berry fruits had good source of natural antioxidants with remarkable high scavenging activity towards superoxide radicals generated chemically [22]. Moreover among the berries, the highest total antioxidant capacity (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity-ORAC) has been observed for strawberries [29,30]. While the antioxidants in the SE may have counteracted the adverse effects of free radicals on the enamel matrix, these results imply that such effects are achieved without any reduction in bleaching efficiency.

Specimens treated with HP alone showed the lowest micro-shear bond strength of resin composite. This may be attributed to the oxidation of organic and inorganic components, and dissolution of enamel mineral content following the application of higher concentration of HP. These findings are in accordance with the results of previous studies by Sulieman M et al., Seghi RR and Denry I and Pinto CF et al., [3,17,26,28]. While one may expect that this group, with its increased surface roughness, may also result in high micro-shear bond strength values, the presence of residual oxygen on the enamel surface, prevents complete polymerisation of the resin, resulting in poor bonding [22,31].

Specimens treated with SE, HPS and HPP showed increased micro-shear bond strength values compared to those treated with HP alone. It can be inferred that, the restoration can be done immediately following the bleaching procedure. Hence, two weeks of waiting period can be avoided, to nullify the presence of oxygen radicals which otherwise could result in incomplete polymerisation. Based on the results of this study, the second null hypothesis was also rejected. However, these micro-shear bond strength values were still significantly less than the untreated controls, indicating that once bleached, any attempts at reversal may not increase micro-shear bond strength values to levels comparable to untreated enamel. The efficacy of SE and proanthocyanidin in reversing the compromised micro-shear bond strength may be attributed to flavonoids, which function as scavengers of free radicals by rapid donation of hydrogen atoms to radicals [30-34].

Limitation(s)

As the present research represents the first report comparing the bleaching efficacy of SE with HP and bonding of resin composite following bleaching, the actual depth of resin penetration by means of Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM), the possible chemical mechanism and its long term efficacy remains a major limitation of this study. Also, other limitation of this study is that, the SEs bleaching efficacy was explored only on tea stained enamel surface, whereas it would have been interesting to explore its activity in non-vital discoloured teeth, fluorosis, which will be, indeed, a possible aim of our future research.

Conclusion(s)

This study highlights that enamel bleaching with SE, effectively bleaches the surface, without significant adverse effects on the enamel surface and allows for immediate bonding procedures without compromising the micro-shear bond strength of the resin.

HP: Hydrogen peroxide; SE: Strawberry extract; HPS: Hydrogen peroxide and strawberry; HPP: Hydrogen peroxide and proanthocyanidin solution*p-value (<0.05) are significantPost-Hoc Tukey HSD was used to identify the significant groups. p-value (<0.05). *** denotes highly significant; HPS: Hydrogen peroxide and strawberry; HPP: Hydrogen peroxide and proanthocyanidin solution

References

[1]Carey CM, Tooth whitening: what we now know J Evid Based Dent Pract 2014 (Suppl 14):70-76.10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.02.00624929591  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Xu B, Li Q, Wang Y, Effects of pH values of hydrogen peroxide bleaching agents on enamel surface properties Oper Dent 2011 36(5):554-62.10.2341/11-045-121859312  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Sulieman M, Addy M, Macdonald E, Rees JS, A safety study in vitro for the effects of an in-office bleaching system on the integrity of enamel and dentine J Dent 2004 32(7):581-90.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.06.00315386865  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Borges AB, Samezima LY, Fonseca LP, Yui KC, Borges AL, Torres CR, Influence of potentially remineralising agents on bleached enamel microhardness Oper Dent 2009 34(5):593-97.10.2341/08-081-L19830975  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Lai SC, Tay FR, Cheung GS, Mak YF, Carvalho RM, Wei SH, Reversal of compromised bonding in bleached enamel J Dent Res 2002 81(7):477-81.10.1177/15440591020810070912161460  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Turkun M, Kaya AD, Effect of 10% sodium ascorbate on the shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached bovine enamel J Oral Rehabil 2004 31(12):1184-91.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01369.x15544654  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Garcia-Godoy F, Dodge WW, Donohue M, O’Quinn JA, Composite resin bond strength after enamel bleaching Oper Dent 1993 18(4):144-47.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Rafighi A, Valizadeh H, Ajami AA, Helai ZN, Comparison of the effect of hydrogel and solution forms of sodium ascorbate on orthodontic bracket-enamel shear bond strength immediately after bleaching: An in vitro study Indian J Dent Res 2010 21(1):54-58./10.4103/0970-9290.6281820427908  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Nair M, Nesamani R, Sanjeev K, Sekar M, Renganathan S, Effect of single and two step application of antioxidant incorporated bleaching agents on bond strength of resin composite and surface changes in enamel Biol Med (Aligarh) 2016 8(7):01-05.10.4172/0974-8369.1000348  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[10]Chacko K, Archana M, Meera P, Vidya V, Jithin P, Comparison between the effect of commercially available chemical teeth whitening paste and teeth whitening paste containing ingredients of herbal origin on human enamel Ayu 2018 39(2):113-17.10.4103/ayu.AYU_82_1830783367  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Anissya P, Tadeus AJ, Opik TH, Teeth re-whitening effect of strawberry juice on coffee stained teeth Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry 2013 25(1):15-20.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Aub M, Ullah J, Zeb AMA, Evaluation of strawberry juice preserved with chemical preservatives at refrigeration temperature Int J Nutr Metab 2010 2(2):027-32.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Gopinath S, James V, Vidya S, Karthikeyan K, Kavitha S, Mahalaxmi S, Effect of bleaching with two different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide containing sweet potato extract as an additive on human enamel: An invitro spectrophotometric and scanning electron microscopy analysis J Cons Dent 2013 16(1):45-48.10.4103/0972-0707.10529823349576  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T, Bovine teeth as possible substitute in the adhesion test J Dent Res 1983 62(10):1076-81./10.1177/002203458306201015016352757  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Chng HK, Ramli HN, Yap AU, Lim CT, Effect of hydrogen peroxide on intertubular dentine J Dent 2005 33(5):363-69.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.01215833391  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Goldstein, Ronald E, Garber, David A. Complete dental bleaching. Quintessence Pub. Co, Chicago 1995  [Google Scholar]

[17]Seghi RR, Denry I, Effects of external bleaching on indentation and abrasion characteristics of human enamel in vitro J Dent Res 1992 71(6):1340-44.10.1177/002203459207100612011613185  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Atkinson HF, An investigation into permeability of human enamel using osmotic methods Br Dent J 1947 83(10):205-14.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Attin T, Hannig C, Wiegand A, Attin R, Effect of bleaching on restorative materials and restorations- a systematic review Dent Mater 2004 20(9):852-61.10.1016/j.dental.2004.04.00215451241  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Dishman MV, Covey DA, Baughan LW, The effects of peroxide bleaching on composite to enamel bond strength Dent Mater 1994 10(1):33-36.10.1016/0109-5641(94)90019-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[21]Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvaiho RM, Reversal of compromised bonding in bleached enamel J Dent Res 2001 80(10):1919-24.10.1177/0022034501080010110111706952  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Wang SY, Lin HS, Antioxidant activity in fruits and leaves of blackberry, raspberry and strawberry varies with cultivar and developmental stage J Agri Food Chem 2000 48(2):140-46.10.1021/jf990834510691606  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Stephanie Hayati AT, Sukartini E, Differences in tooth whitening effect between strawberry juice and apple juice in vitro Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry 2012 24(1):65-70.10.24198/pjd.vol24no1.15385  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Lu S, Song J, Campbell-Palmer L, A modified chemiluminescence method for hydrogen peroxide determination in apple fruit tissues Sci Hort 2009 120(3):336-41.10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.003  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[25]Alqahtani MQ, Tooth bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: A literature review The Saudi Dental Journal 2014 26(2):33-46.10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.00225408594  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Fine AM, Oligomeric proanthocyanidin complexes: history, structure, and phytopharmaceutical applications Altern Med Rev 2000 5(2):144-51.  [Google Scholar]

[27]McCracken MS, Haywood VB, Demineralisation effects of 10% carbamide peroxide J Dent 1996 24(6):395-98.10.1016/0300-5712(95)00113-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[28]Pinto CF, Oliveria Rd, Cavalli V, Giannini M, Peroxide bleaching agent effects on effects on enamel surface microhardness, roughness and morphology Braz Oral Res 2004 18(4):306-11.10.1590/S1806-8324200400040000616089261  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Giampieri F, Tulipani S, Alvarez-Suarez JM, Quiles JL, Mezzetti B, Battino M, The strawberry: Composition, nutritional quality and impact on human health Nutr J 2012 28(1):09-19.10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.00922153122  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Wang H, Cao G, Prior RL, Total antioxidant capacity of fruits J Agri Food Chem 1996 44:701-05.10.1021/jf950579y  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[31]Vidhya S, Srinivasulu S, Sujatha M, Mahalaxmi S, Effect of grape seed extract on the bond strength of bleached enamel Oper Dent 2011 36(4):433-38.10.2341/10-228-L21834712  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Soobrattee MA, Bahorun T, Aruoma OI, Chemo preventive actions of polyphenolic compounds in cancer Bio Factors 2006 27(1-4):19-35.10.1002/biof.552027010317012761  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Huang W, Zhang H, Liu W, Li C, Survey of antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of blueberry, blackberry, and strawberry in Nanjing J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2012 13(2):94-102.10.1631/jzus.B110013722302422  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Harborne JB, Williams CA, Advances in flavonoid research since 1992 Phytochemistry 2000 55(6):481-504.10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00235-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]