JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/47868.14520
Year : 2021 | Month : Feb | Volume : 15 | Issue : 02 Full Version Page : SC10 - SC13

Short Term Outcome of Children with Antenatally Diagnosed Heart Disease: A Retrospective Single Centre Study

Dheeraj Deo Bhatt1, Dinesh Kumar2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital, Delhi, India.
2 Professor, Department of Paediatrics, ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital, Delhi, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Dheeraj Deo Bhatt, D6/99, Kaveri Apartment, Vasant Kunj, Delhi, India.
E-mail: dheeraj491@hotmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The aim of foetal echocardiography is to improve the outcome of foetuses with congenital heart diseases. Impact of foetal echocardiography on the foetuses with antenatally diagnosed heart disease is less studied in public divtor hospitals in India.

Aim

To evaluate the short term outcome of infants born with antenatally diagnosed heart disease.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective observational study conducted from April 2016 to June 2019 in a tertiary care public hospital in Northern India. Data was tabulated as mean, frequency and percentages, analysis were done in Microsoft excel 2013. Study included total of 1013 patients who underwent foetal echocardiography during the study period.

Results

Heart disease was found in 59 patients after excluding five cases of ductal constriction. Referral for foetal echocardiography was frequently late. Among the group with abnormal foetal echocardiography, the mean gestational age at the time of diagnosis was 28.4 weeks. Follow-up data was available for 45 patients. A 24.4% (11/45) of those diagnosed with heart disease did not survive till term. 50% (17/34) of those born died before three months of age. Only two neonates underwent surgery before three months of age. Overall, 62.2% did not survive beyond three months of age.

Conclusion

It was found that referrals for foetal echocardiography in setting were frequently late. Despite antenatal diagnosis the outcome for foetuses with heart disease was less than optimal. This reflects both the complexity of heart disease as well as lack of paediatric cardiac care to young infants in the setting. Access to high quality cardiac care for infants and neonates are essential for foetal echocardiography to have a meaningful impact on foetuses with heart disease.

Keywords

Introduction

Congenital heart disease is the most common malformation affecting human foetuses. The aim of foetal echocardiography is to identify structural heart disease or rhythm disorders in foetuses in order to improve their outcome. As a result of increasing awareness among physicians as well as patients, greater number of pregnant females are now-a-days undergoing foetal echocardiography. Though the impact of foetal echocardiography on the outcome of infants with congential heart disease has been well studied in the west, there are only a handful of studies on this topic from India [1-5]. Most of these studies are from private institutions in Kerala, India. There is scarcity of data on this topic from other parts of India, especially from public sector hospitals. Survival of the foetuses with congenital heart disease depends on various factors like presence of extracardiac anomalies, severity of cardiac lesion, socio-economic status, religious/social influence and access to paediatric cardiac care [1-5]. All of these factors may vary in different healthcare settings even within a country. Therefore, there is a need to assess the effect of foetal echocardiography on the outcome of foetuses in other parts of the country.

This study was done to evaluate the outcome of foetuses who were antenatally detected to have heart disease in a public sector hospital in Northern India.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective observational study which was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics of a tertiary care public hospital in Northern India from April 2016 to June 2019. Ethical committee clearance and consent was not taken as this was a retrospective review of records of data. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Patients who were referred for foetal echocardiography were included in the study. Patients who had repeat foetal echocardiography during the period or those undergoing first trimester foetal echocardiography were excluded.

Foetal echocardiography was done on Philips XD 11 E machine with an S 2-5 curvilinear probe. Referred patients were divided into lower and higher risk groups. Lower risk pregnancies were defined as those pregnancies where the risk of the foetus having congenital heart disease was less than 1% as per the American Heart Association (AHA). Higher risk pregnancies were those which had more than 1% risk of having foetuses with heart disease [6]. After echocardiography, parents of foetuses with heart disease were explained about the nature of the cardiac lesion and the possible management options were discussed. They were then sent back to the referring Obstetricians. Children with complex and potentially serious heart disease were advised to conduct delivery of their child at a tertiary care cardiac centre. The actual delivery and postnatal management of these foetuses were done in different public sector hospitals, including our own hospital. All patients were advised postnatal echocardiography for confirmation of diagnosis. Data about the demography, indication, result of foetal echocardiography and outcome was retrieved from records.

Statistical Analysis

Data was tabulated as mean (standard deviation), percentages and frequencies analysis was done in Microsoft Excel 2013.

Results

There were a total of 1013 patients who underwent foetal echocardiography from April 2016 to June 2019 in the hospital. The age of mother and gestational age at the time of foetal echocardiography is shown in [Table/Fig-1]. Sixty four foetuses had abnormal findings. After excluding five foetuses with ductal constriction, there were a total of fifty-nine foetuses with structurally abnormal hearts.

Age and period of gestation of patients at the time of foetal echocardiography.

VariablesValue
Total number of patients (n)1013
Average age (SD) (years)27.3 (4.4)
Average Period of Gestation (SD) (weeks)26.3 (4.4)
Average age, in those with heart disease (SD) (years)26.0 (4.3)
Average period of gestation, in those with heart disease (SD) (weeks)28.5 (5.2)

711/1013, (70.2%) of the patients who were referred for foetal echocardiography were at low risk pregnancies while 29.8% were at high risk. The indications for referral and the number of foetuses with structurally abnormal hearts are tabulated in [Table/Fig-2,3].

Referral indications and number of patients with heart disease with each indication in high risk patients.

Referral indicationNumber of patients (n)Patients with heart disease in each group (n)
Maternal diabetes1182
Cardiac anomaly in ultrasound6751
Extra-cardiac anomaly in ultrasound370
Previous child with heart disease311
Twin pregnancy290
Others200
Total30254

Referral indications and number of patients with heart disease with each indication in low risk patients.

Referral indicationNumber of patients (n)Patients with heart disease in each group (n)
No specific indication5225
Echogenic focus982
Drugs during pregnancy251
Bad obstetric history242
IUGR100
Others320
Total71110

IUGR: Intrauterine growth retardation


The indication with the highest yield was abnormal heart seen in level two ultrasound, 76% of those who were referred for foetal echocardiography had structurally abnormal heart. Out of 51 such patients, 34 (66.7%) were referred because of an abnormality seen in the four chamber view and the remaining 17 were referred for an abnormal three vessel view.

Short term outcome data was available for 45 out of 59 patients. [Table/Fig-4] shows the variety of heart diseases diagnosed and their short term outcome till three months. Overall 28/45 (62.2%) of those who were antenatally diagnosed to have heart disease did not survive beyond the first three months.

Abnormalities detected in foetal echocardiography and their short term outcome.

DiagnosisNumber of patients (n)Died before birth (n)Total death in three month (n)
VSD1502
Single ventricle725
HLHS525
PA IVS303
AVSD323
TOF312
TGA101
DORV/Coarctation212
Coarctation101
Ebstein101
DCM222
HCM111
ccTGA100
Total451128

VSD: Ventricular septal defect; SV: Single ventricle; HLHS: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; PA VS: Pulmonary atresia with ntact ventricular septum; AVSD: Atrioventricular septal defect; TOF: Tetralogy of Falot; TGA: Transposition of great arteries; DORV: Double outlet right ventricle; DCM:Dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ccTGA: Congenitally corrected TGA


Discussion

Ideally, all children with congenital heart diseases, especially the ones requiring intervention in the first few months of life should have an antenatal diagnosis by foetal echocardiography. This will help the parents in planning the pregnancy, place of delivery and arranging the logistics so that the outcome of the foetus is improved.

In this study, the outcome of foetuses who had an antenatal diagnosis of heart disease were studied. The majority of patients were from low socio-economic strata. Delivery and subsequent treatment of foetuses/neonates/infants was done in different public sector hospitals in Delhi.

The ideal timing of foetal echocardiography is 18-22 week as per the AHA guidelines [6]. In the present study, most referrals were late. Among those detected to have structural heart disease, the mean gestational age at the time of foetal echocardiography was 28.4 weeks. Thus, most patients with structural heart disease had their antenatal diagnosis well beyond the legal time limit for medical termination of pregnancy. This pattern of late referral has been seen in previous studies from India [7-9].

Most referrals for foetal echocardiography (70.2%) in the present study had lower risk pregnancies. A 1.4% of the lower risk cases had heart disease compared to 16.2% of the higher risk cases. The AHA guideline states that foetal echocardiography is not indicated in those mothers who have lower risk pregnancies, which is defined as those pregnancies with less than 1% risk for heart disease in their foetus. However, in the present study, the majority of the subjects were from this lower risk group. This study reiterates the value of adhering to existing guidelines for referral as there was high yield of heart disease in the higher risk cases only.

Various studies from the west have documented the positive impact of prenatal diagnosis on specific types of heart diseases [10-12]. The heart diseases known to have been positively impacted due to pre-natal diagnosis are hypoplastic left heart syndrome, coarctation of aorta, transposition of great arteries and pulmonary atresia. Though one may think that antenatal diagnosis would help the foetus and ensure its survival, it is not always true. In a study published in lancet in 1999, half of the foetuses with antenatally diagnosed heart disease ended in termination of pregnancy in UK [13].

There are a handful of studies from India which have described the postnatal outcome of foetuses with antenatally diagnosed heart disease [Table/Fig-5] [1-5]. Most of these studies are from private tertiary care medical centres from Kerala. There is only one small study on this subject from a public hospital in North India. The patients attending a public sector hospital are generally of low socio-economic status and it is difficult for them to access neonatal cardiac care.

Tabulation of data from previous studies from India which have described outcome of foetuses with antenatally detected heart disease.

Author and year of publicationNumber of foetuses includedSettingPercentage not surving till termPostnatal outcome (among those born alive)Percentage undergoing procedures (among those born alive)
Vaidyanathan B et al., [2], 201368 (all conotruncal anomalies)Private tertiary care cardiac centre in Kerala54.417.8% died in neonatal period17.8%
Changlani TD et al., [1], 2015552 overall, 121 followed-upPrivate tertiary care cardiac centre in Kerala44.014% died in neonatal period.27.2%
Sharma S et al., [3], 201718Public medical college hospital in Punjab27.815.3% of the 13 live born died in neonatal periodNot available
Devadasan S et al., [4], 2018290 major congenital heart diseasePrivate tertiary care cardiac centre in Kerala78.631% of the 62 live born cases died by one year29% (exact timing not mentioned)
Vaidyanathan B et al., [5], 2020504(all univentricular heart)Private tertiary care cardiac centre in Kerala54.039.5% died at a median follow-up 10 months16.2% underwent neonatal procedures
Bhatt DD and Kumar D, (Present study), 202159Follow-up data available for 45Public sector tertiary care centre in Delhi18.650% of 34 live birth died before three months5.9% underwent neonatal procedures

These previous studies show that, there is high rate of foetal loss in pregnancies with antenatally detected heart disease. The percentage of foetuses not surviving till term in previous Indian studies range form 27.8-78.6 [1-5]. In the present study, out of the 45 patients whose follow-up was available 11/45 (24.4%) did not result in live birth. Foetal losses are due to spontaneous abortions, intrauterine deaths and medical termination of pregnancies. Slightly lesser percentage of foetal loss in present study may be due to the fact that all diagnoses were made after the legal time limit of termination of pregnancy and hence medical termination did not contribute to the foetal losses.

In the present study, out of 34 live births, 17 (50.0%) died before three months of age with neonatal mortality of 41.1%. This was in contrast to previous studies where the mortality rate was lower than present study [1-5]. The percentage of death in the neonatal period in previous studies range from 14-17.8% [1-3]. One previous study has reported a mortality of 31% at one year whereas another has reported 39.5% mortality at a median follow-up of 10 months [4,5].

The poor postnatal outcome in present study reflects the complex nature of heart diseases as well as lack of access to timely cardiac interventional or surgical treatment to neonates and small infants with congenital heart disease. The outcome of neonate with heart disease depends upon a variety of factors including associated diseases, severity of heart disease, parental socio-economic status, access to care, and parental decision to continue cardiac care. In our study, all the parents of the affected newborns had the intention to continue cardiac care.

In the present study, out of the 17 newborn who died, eight were delivered in tertiary care paediatric centre, eight in a tertiary care cardiac centre and one was a home delivery. Out of these 17 infants, two infants with Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) died of non-cardiac cause. One had birth asphyxia and another had undiagnosed trachea-oesophageal fistula, which was successfully operated. Subsequently, patient developed pneumonia and died due to pneumonia. None of the patients with a diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, pulmonary atresia with intact septum, coarctation of aorta, Ebstein’s anomaly or transposition of great arteries survived beyond the first month. Out of the 34 live birth with heart disease, 24 required surgical or catheter intervention but only two patients underwent any surgery or intervention in the first three months of life. Both of these were neonatal BT shunt and out of these one survived. This is again in contrast to previous studies from Southern India where higher percentage (16.8-17.2) of newborns with heart diseases underwent interventions [1,2,5].

In the present setting, despite prenatal diagnosis, the outcome of foetuses which require early intervention is suboptimal due to complexity of diseases and lack of access to timely intervention. Only one public sector hospital in Delhi is routinely doing cardiac surgical or interventional treatment in neonates and small infants, more such centres are needed. Many private institutions are providing neonatal cardiac care but access to such care for people from low socio-economic status needs to be improved. Kerala has successfully implemented a program called Hridyam for children with heart disease. A web based registry was used to allocate children with heart disease to various public and private institutes for treatment according to the clinical priority [14]. Similar government program is needed in other parts of the country to improve the outcome of foetuses with antenatlly detected heart disease.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of this study was the small size, retrospective nature of the study and loss to follow-up of study subjects.

Conclusion(s)

It is concluded from present study that, the referral for foetal echocardiography is frequently delayed and majority of referrals are of low risk cases. Earlier and more selective referral for foetal echocardiography is desirable. This will give the parents of foetuses with serious congenital heart disease adequate time to decide about continuing pregnancy versus opting for medical termination of pregnancy. In this study, the outcome of children with antenatally diagnosed heart disease was less than optimal. Infrastructure and manpower in public sector hospitals should be developed in order to cater to the children requiring intervention in neonatal and early infancy. Government health schemes should be designed such that timely intervention of neonates with heart disease is possible in both public and private sector hospitals.

IUGR: Intrauterine growth retardationVSD: Ventricular septal defect; SV: Single ventricle; HLHS: Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; PA VS: Pulmonary atresia with ntact ventricular septum; AVSD: Atrioventricular septal defect; TOF: Tetralogy of Falot; TGA: Transposition of great arteries; DORV: Double outlet right ventricle; DCM:Dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ccTGA: Congenitally corrected TGA

References

[1]Changlani TD, Jose A, Sudhakar A, Rojal R, Kunjikutty R, Vaidyanathan B, Outcomes of infants with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease delivered in a tertiary-care paediatric cardiac facility Indian Paediatr 2015 52(10):852-56.10.1007/s13312-015-0731-x26499008  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Vaidyanathan B, Kumar S, Sudhakar A, Kumar RK, Conotruncal anomalies in the foetus: Referral patterns and pregnancy outcomes in a dedicated foetal cardiology unit in South India Annals of Paediatric Cardiology 2013 6(1):15-20.10.4103/0974-2069.10722723626429  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Sharma S, Kaur N, Kaur K, Naveen NC, Role of echocardiography in prenatal screening of congenital heart diseases and its correlation with postnatal outcome J Clin Diag Res 2017 11(4):12-14.10.7860/JCDR/2017/25929.975028571229  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Devadasan S, Balakrishnan B, Batra M, Sreeja P, Swapneel NP, Gopinathan K, Trends and outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac defects: Experience of a dedicated fetal medicine centre from south India Journal of Fetal Medicine 2018 5:225-31.10.1007/s40556-018-0186-y  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[5]Vaidyanathan B, Vijayaraghavan A, Thomas S, Sudhakar A, Pregnancy and early post-natal outcomes of fetuses with functionally univentricular heart in a low-and-middle-income country Cardiol Young 2020 30(12):1844-50.10.1017/S104795112000292932959750  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, Copel JA, Sklansky MS, Abuhamad A, Diagnosis and treatment of foetal cardiac disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. American Heart Association Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Joint Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing Circulation 2014 129(21):2183-242.10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d24763516  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Chitra N, Vijayalakshmi IB, Foetal echocardiography for early detection of congenital heart diseases J Echocardiogr 2017 15(1):13-17.10.1007/s12574-016-0308-227530200  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Nair A, Radhakrishnan S, Evaluation of referral pattern for fetal echocardiography at a tertiary care center in northern India and its implications J Obstet Gynaecol India 2016 66(Suppl 1):258-62.10.1007/s13224-016-0872-427651614  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Saxena A, Shrivastava S, Kothari SS, Value of antenatal echocardiography in high risk patients to diagnose congenital cardiac defects in foetus Indian J Paediatr 1995 62(5):575-82.10.1007/BF0276188110829925  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH, Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome Circulation 2001 103(9):1269-73.10.1161/01.CIR.103.9.126911238272  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Bonnet D, Coltri A, Butera G, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Kachaner J, Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality Circulation 1999 99(7):916-18.10.1161/01.CIR.99.7.91610027815  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Franklin O, Burch M, Manning N, Sleeman K, Gould S, Archer N, Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta improves survival and reduces morbidity Heart 2002 87(1):67-69.10.1136/heart.87.1.6711751670  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Bull C, Current and potential impact of foetal diagnosis on prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK. British Paediatric Cardiac Association Lancet 1999 354(9186):1242-47.10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01167-8  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]A based registry [Internet] [Last accessed on 2021 Jan 21]. Available from: https://hridyam.in  [Google Scholar]