JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Radiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2021/45837.14398
Year : 2021 | Month : Jan | Volume : 15 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : TC01 - TC06

Unusual Thoracic Tumours- A Concise Imaging Approach

Alka Goyal1, Meenu Bagarhatta2, Naresh Kumar Mangalhara3, Vikas Jhanwar4, Raghav Tiwari5, Sunita Kumari6

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
2 Head, Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
6 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Naresh Kumar Mangalhara, 33, West Mangal Vihar Extension, Near Riddhi Siddh Chauraha, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: naresh.mangalhara@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

There are certain uncommon large thoracic masses sharing overlapping radiological features with commoner ones except few salient characteristic features. Diagnosing these uncommon tumours has practical implications for patient management and prognosis including obviating unnecessary surgeries.

Aim

To demonstrate characteristic Computed Tomography (CT) features of large common and certain uncommon intra-thoracic masses.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cross-divtional search was done in January 2020, from the archives of patients record in Radiology Department from December 2017 to January 2019 for intra-thoracic tumours. Those tumors or masses meeting inclusion criteria were analysed by two radiologists who were blinded about the histopathologic reports. A probable radiological diagnosis was made and it was later matched-up with the histopathologic reports to reach to a confirmed diagnosis. The unique CT features were separately tabulated and their p-value for a particular diagnosis was calculated using Fisher’s-exact test.

Results

Out of total 23 cases studied, 12 bronchogenic carcinomas and 11 uncommon diagnoses including Solitary fibrous tumour, Synovial sarcoma, Pulmonary blastoma, Askin’s tumour, Schwannoma and Metastasis were found. Subtle rib erosion in Askin’s tumour (p-value=0.004), intra-tumoural vessels in Synovial sarcomas (p-value=0.0006) and intense enhancement in some non-bronchogenic tumours (p-value=0.0137) were found to be significantly associated features.

Conclusion

When encountering an opaque hemithorax on chest radiograph and a large mass on CT, one should look for certain peculiar features of these unusual lung masses to suggest them as a differential diagnosis, as “Our eyes see only what our mind knows”.

Keywords

Introduction

Imaging evaluation of thoracic tumours gives information on the extent of tumour involvement, potential for resectability and its response to therapy [1]. Routine radiological evaluation includes conventional radiography and computed tomography. Chest X-ray is a rather insensitive imaging modality for thoracic tumours. In routine clinical practice, CT is the most common cost effective imaging modality applied for the evaluation of intra-thoracic masses. CT helps in staging, characterisation and prognostic evaluation of mass lesions and thus, alerts the clinicians and radiologists about a malignancy [2]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), can be better informative in certain conditions like to look for chest wall soft tissue details, mediastinal involvement or to determine neurogenic origin of masses [3].

Bronchogenic carcinomas constitute a major bulk of the common thoracic tumours presenting mostly when small in size due to their central location or early metastasis [4]. However, in some cases, they may present at a larger size and may then have to be differentiated from uncommon intra-thoracic masses which mostly present when large in size and show no signs of invasion/metastasis.

It is important to note that the imaging appearances of common and uncommon thoracic tumours exhibit considerable overlap. Hence, the diagnosis of an unusual lung tumour is mostly made retrospectively from a biopsy report [4]. In this study, we aim to demonstrate characteristic CT features of large common and certain uncommon intra-thoracic masses along with their histopathology correlation. We further wish to encourage co-radiologists to include these tumours in differential diagnoses apart from the common ones by identifying their characteristic CT features which has practical implications for patient management and prognosis including deterring unnecessary surgeries.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional data analysis was done on archives of patient record in Radiology Department from December 2017 to January 2019 for intra-thoracic tumours. Study was conducted in January 2020 in SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Since this study involves secondary data analysis, calculation of sample size was not required and all patients meeting the inclusion criteria were treated as sample size. Moreover, since it is a retrospective non-interventional study with treatment of all the patients completed before start of the study, consent was waived-off.

Inclusion criteria: All cases having large intra-thoracic masses (>7 cm in widest dimension on CT scan) and all cases having contrast enhanced CT chest scans and whose histopathology reports were traceable were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All cases having masses of cardiac/pericardial or mediastinal origin and those cases who had received neo-adjuvant therapy prior to scanning, were excluded from the study.

Out of total 44 selected cases, 23 cases have been found to meet the above mentioned criteria. All the included chest CT scans were reviewed consensually by two experienced radiologists. Both were blinded about the histopathology reports. All lesions were confirmed to be intra-thoracic and >7 cm and then following information was collected about each one of them- location, shape, margins, enhancement pattern, cavitation, calcification, presence/absence of necrosis, intra-lesional vessels, associated pleural/pericardial effusion, suspect lymphadenopathy and rib involvement [Table/Fig-1].

Imaging characteristics of masses.

S. No.Final diagnosesShapeSize (cm)MarginAdd. features and pressure effectEnhancement patternCavitation/Necrosis/Intra-lesional vesselsCalcificationLAPEffusionRib change
1.Pulmonary blastomaRound15×13Smooth and lobulatedInverted dome and cardiac shiftingHeterogenous and IntenseNecrosis (+++)----
2.Askin’s tumourRound12×8Smooth and lobulatedNo mass effectHomogenous and moderateMinimal necrosisRing like coarse calcification-Mild left pleural and pericardialLeft 4th rib destruction
3.Mucinous adenocarcinoma metastasisOvoid15×11SmoothOpaque hemithoraxHeterogenous intense peripheral and septalNecrosis (+++)Coarse calcification-Minimal left pleural and mild pericardial-
4.Synovial SarcomaRound10×10SmoothLower lung mild cardiac shiftingIntense heterogenous with shaggy inner marginsNecrosis (+++) and large intra-lesional vessels--Mild left pleural and pericardial-
5.Squamous cell carcinomaIrregular12×9UndefineCentralHeterogenousNecrosis(+++)----
6.AdenocarcinomaOval9×7SmoothNo mass effectHeterogenousMild necrosisAbsent within the lesion+Minimal right pleural-
7.AdenocarcinomaRound9.5×9.0SmoothNo mass effectHeterogenousMild necrosis-+--
8.AdenocarcinomaRound9.0×8.5SmoothNo mass effectHeterogenousSignificant necrosis-+Minimal left pleural-
9.Synovial sarcomaRound14×14SmoothCardiac shiftingHeterogenous predominantly peripheral intense with shaggy marginLarge areas of necrosis with intra-tumoural vessels--Minimal left trapped pleural effusion-
10SFTRound13.5×13Smooth and lobulatedLower lung and diaphragmatic flatteningSolid, mild heterogenousSmall necrotic areasTiny foci of calcification---
11.Askin’s tumourOval30×25SmoothCardiac shifting and diaphragmatic inversionHeterogenous and intense with shaggy inner marginsNecrosis (+++)---Left 5th rib destruction
12.SchwannomaRound11×11SmoothParavertebralHomogenous-Speck of calcification at periphery---
13.Squamous cell carcinomaIrregular and spiculated11×9.0UndefineCentrally located with distal collapseHeterogenousNecrosis and cavitation +--Mild right pleural effusion-
14.Squamous cell carcinomaIrregular8.5×7.5UndefineMid lung zoneHeterogenous+-+Minimal right pleural effusion-
15.Squamous cell carcinomaRound7.5×7.0LobulatedPeripheralHeterogenousCavitation +_+Mild right pleural effusion-
16.Small cell carcinomaIrregular10×9.0UndefineCentral with distal collapseHeterogenous+-+Minimal right pleural effusion-
17.Synovial sarcomaRound9.0×9.0Smooth and well definedLower lung and cardiac shiftingHeterogenousNecrosis with intra-tumoural vessels__Mild left pleural effusion-
18.Pulmonary blastomaRound14×13.5Smooth and lobulatedHeterogenous+_+_-
19.Large cell carcinomaOval14×10UndefineHeterogenous+----
20.AdenocarcinomaIrregular11×10SmoothHeterogenous--+Minimal left pleural and pericardial effusion-
21.Large cell carcinomaOval11.3×10.5SmoothPeripheralHeterogenous+-+--
22.Small cell carcinomaIrregular8.6×8.0UndefineCentralHeterogenousFew necrotic areas++Moderate left pleural effusion_
23SFTRound12×11SmoothLower lung no mass effectHeterogenous+__Minimal left pleural effusion-

Necrosis (+++)-extensive, SFT: Solitary fibrous tumour; Add.: Additional; LAP: Lymphadenopathy


A probable radiological diagnosis was consensually reached for each case and it was correlated with the histopathology report to reach a confirmed diagnosis.

Statistical Analysis

The unique CT features mentioned in the above list were separately tabulated and p-value for a particular diagnosis was calculated using Fisher’s-exact test. The statistical analysis was done using statistical software SPSS for windows (version 16).

Results

Among the 23 patients studied, 13 were males and 10 were females. Mean age was 44 years (44±10.67 years), ranging from 3-70 years. Core biopsy of all the patients was done in Radiology Department.

Among all the masses studied, 15 (65.22%) had their origin from the lungs, 2 (8.70%) were from pleura, 2 (8.70%) were from chest wall and rest 4 (17.39%) were indeterminate in origin.

The most predominant margin was smooth and lobulated (17 i.e., 73.91%). Most of the masses originating in the lungs, were showing heterogenous density with presence of necrosis (21 out of 23 i.e., 91.30%). Most of them had associated minimal to mild pleural effusion (14 out of 23 i.e., 60.87%). Calcification was seen only in 5 patients (Sr. No. 2,3,10,12,22) (21.74%). Intra-tumoural vessels were seen in 3 lung masses [Table/Fig-1,2 and 3].

Baseline characteristics of subjects including their probable CT diagnosis and final HPE diagnosis.

S. NoAge (years)SexProbable diagnosis on CTLocationSideFinal HPE diagnosis
1.65MBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungLSquamous cell carcinoma
2.62MBronchogenic neoplasm likely squamous cell carcinomaLungRSquamous cell carcinoma
3.58MBronchogenic neoplasm likely squamous cell carcinomaLungRSquamous cell carcinoma
4.63MBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungRSquamous cell carcinoma
5.54FBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungLAdenocarcinoma
6.70FBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungRAdenocarcinoma
7.42MBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungLAdenocarcinoma
8.65MBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungLAdenocarcinoma
9.59MBronchogenic neoplasm likely small cell carcinomaLungRSmall cell carcinoma
10.63MBronchogenic neoplasm likely small cell carcinomaLungLSmall cell carcinoma
11.65MBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungRLarge cell carcinoma
12.66MBronchogenic neoplasm likely non-small cell carcinomaLungRLarge cell carcinoma
13.3MPulmonary blastomaLungRPulmonary blastoma
14.6MPulmonary blastomaLungRPulmonary blastoma
15.36FNeoplastic lesionLungLMucinous adenocarcinoma metastasis
16.20FMesenchymal neoplasm likely sarcomaLung/pleura*LSynovial sarcoma
17.21FMesenchymal neoplasm likely sarcomaLung/pleura*LSynovial sarcoma
18.22FMesenchymal neoplasm likely sarcomaLung/pleura*LSynovial sarcoma
19.16FAskin’s tumourChest wall (left 5th rib)*LAskin’s tumour
20.9MAskin’s tumourChest wall (left 4th rib)*LAskin’s tumour
21.55FBenign mesenchymal neoplasmPleura/chest wall*LSchwannoma
22.45FPleural based neoplasm possibly SFTPleuraRSolitary fibrous tumour
23.47FPleural based neoplasm possibly SFTPleuraLSolitary fibrous tumour

*Masses with indeterminate origin

HPE: Histopathological examination; CT: Computed tomography; M: Male; F: Female; R: Right; L: Left; SFT: Solitary fibrous tumour


Spectrum of CT findings of lung masses along with their relative frequencies.

CT findingsNo. of tumoursPercentage
Location
LungChest wallPleuraIndeterminate1522465.22%8.70%8.70%17.39%
Margins
Smooth/LobulatedUndefined17673.91%26.09%
Enhancement
HomogenousHeterogenousIntense22158.69%91.30%21.73%
Calcification521.74%
Pleural effusion1460.87%
Intra-tumoural vessels313.04%
Chest wall/rib involvement28.69%
Intra-thoracic suspect lymph nodes1043.48%

CT: Computed tomography


Intra-tumoural vessels were found to be extremely significant for the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma [Table/Fig-4]. Both chest wall lesions were associated with subtle rib destruction suggesting osseous origin, later confirmed as Askin’s tumour on histopathology (Sr. No. 2 and 11) [Table/Fig-1]. This association of rib erosion with Askin’s tumour was found to be very statistically significant (p-value 0.004) [Table/Fig-5]. About 10 out of 23 (43.48%) masses had associated lymphadenopathy.

Statistical analysis of intra-lesional vascularity as a CT feature.

CT diagnosisIntra-lesional vascularity presentIntra-lesional vascularity absentTotal
Synovial sarcoma303
Others02020
Total32023

p-value=0.0006 (Extremely statistically significant), calculated via Fischer’s-exact test


Statistical analysis of rib erosion as a CT feature.

CT diagnosisRib erosion presentRib erosion absentTotal
Askin’s tumour202
Others02121
Total22123

p-value= 0.004 (Very statistically significant), calculated via Fischer’s-exact test

CT: Computed Tomography


None of the mass lesion centered in lung parenchyma had rib destruction. Two localised pleural based masses were diagnosed as solitary fibrous tumour on histopathology. About 4 out of 23 masses had indeterminate origin i.e., from lungs/pleura/chest wall, 3 of them proved as synovial sarcomas and 1 as schwannoma on histopathology [Table/Fig-2]. About 5 out of 23 (21.73%) cases had intense enhancement, all 5 tumours being non-bronchogenic in origin and this feature was found to be significantly associated for non-bronchogenic origin (p-value 0.0137) [Table/Fig-6].

Statistical analysis of intense enhancement as a CT feature.

CT featuresIntense enhancement presentIntense enhancement absentTotal
Non-bronchogenic5611
Bronchogenic01212
Total51823

p-value=0.0137 (Statistically significant), calculated via Fischer’s-exact test


The baseline characteristics of subjects included their probable CT diagnosis and final HPE diagnosis. Out of total 4 squamous cell carcinoma on HPE, 2 were confidently diagnosed on CT scan due to presence of cavitation. Rest 2 were diagnosed as non-small cell bronchogenic neoplasm. All 4 adenocarcinomas and 2 large cell carcinomas were confidently diagnosed as bronchogenic non-small cell neoplasm owing to their large size and predominantly peripheral location. Both small cell carcinomas were diagnosed on CT scan confidently as they had typical features like central location and calcification.

Both pleuro-pulmonary blastomas were diagnosed confidently on CT scan due to their typical age of presentation and imaging features. All 3 synovial sarcomas were diagnosed as mesenchymal neoplasm-sarcomas on CT scan which were proven as synovial sarcomas on HPE. Metastasis from carcinoma colon was diagnosed as neoplastic lesion only on CT scan due to its atypical imaging and solitary lesion. Schwannoma was diagnosed as benign mesenchymal neoplasm on CT. Askin’s tumour were correctly diagnosed on CT due to its typical rib erosion feature. Both solitary fibrous tumours were suggested on CT due to pleural based neoplastic localised masses [Table/Fig-2].

Discussion

There are a wide variety of large thoracic tumours which present with imaging features mimicking those of the common varieties of bronchogenic carcinomas. On initial chest radiographs, these masses usually appear as an opaque hemithorax or an obvious large opaque mass. CT scan, however, remains the imaging modality of choice [3]. Moreover, the CT scanners are day by day becoming more sophisticated in design and versatility and hence, will surely remain the principal imaging modality for evaluation of thoracic masses in near future [5].

In the present study, out of all 23 large thoracic masses, 15 originated from lungs. Out of these 23, 12 were epithelial tumours arising from lung (4-squamous cell, 2-small cell, 4-adenocarcinomas and 2-large cell carcinoma), 10 were mesenchymal tumours (3 synovial cell sarcomas, 2-askin’s tumour, 2-solitary fibrous tumour, 2-pulmonary blastoma and 1-schwannoma) and 1 was metastasis from mucinous adenocarcinoma of colon.

Now taking each tumour independently, CT scan of the four squamous cell carcinoma cases showed heterogeneity due to the presence of necrosis, three of them showed undefined margins and one showed lobulated margins. Although cavitation is an important feature of squamous cell carcinoma [5], this feature was seen in only two out of four cases in this study. Three out of four cases had associated pleural effusion. Suspect lymph nodes were present in two cases. In the present study, complete lung collapse was seen in one centrally located cavitating tumour which later proved to be squamous cell carcinoma on histopathology. One of the cases also had additional large necrotic well defined nodule in the opposite lung.

The CT of four adenocarcinomas included in the study showed large smoothly marginated peripherally located heterogenous necrotic masses with associated lymphadenopathy in all and minimal effusion present in three cases.

Small cell carcinoma was found in two cases. On CT scan, one of them had centrally located large calcified mass with distal collapse, pleural effusion and hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The other one showed left pleural effusion, large confluent mediastinal lymphadenopathy with left hilar involvement having internal calcification. Intra-tumoural calcification has also been described in up to 23% patients with small cell carcinoma in a study done by Carter BW et al., [6].

Large cell carcinomas were found in two cases. They showed non-specific findings on CT scan including large heterogenous well defined masses with no effusion. However, one of them had suspected mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Similar findings of having large heterogenous masses with/without lymphadenopathy have also been observed by Hollings N and Shaw P [5].

There were three cases of pleuro-pulmonary synovial sarcoma of the chest in the present study originating either in lung or pleura. Majority of the cases reported in literature as pleuro-pulmonary synovial sarcoma had peripheral/parafissural location with an uncertain origin from pleura/lung due to large size [7]. Same was true for all three cases in this study. All of them further showed relatively homogenous large opacity on chest X-ray with contralateral mediastinal shifting and no obvious bony erosion/lymphadenopathy, while on CT scan, all cases had large heterogenous masses with extensive necrosis and peripheral enhancement with septations and large intra-lesional vessels. Intra-tumoural vessels were found as a very common internal feature (92.9%) in a study done by Kim GH et al., [8]. All of them had ipsilateral minimal to mild pleural effusion with contralateral mediastinal shifting. None of them had calcification/suspect lymphadenopathy or thoracic wall invasion [Table/Fig-7].

Synovial sarcoma in 20-year-old female. (a). Chest skiagram showing large round opacity in left mid and lower zones with mild right sided cardiac shifting.(b) and (c) Axial contrast enhanced CT scans showing large intensely enhancing necrotic soft tissue density mass lesion with prominent intra-lesional vessels.

Two cases diagnosed as Askin’s tumour presented as opaque hemithorax on chest X-ray and large extrapulmonary masses with solitary rib destruction on CT scan. One of them had predominantly homogenous enhancement, internal calcification as well as pleural effusion. Other showed heterogenous enhancement with extensive necrosis and contralateral mediastinal shifting. None of them had lymphadenopathy. Solitary rib destruction is a rather specific feature, present in 25-63% cases [9]. Subtle bony changes are sometimes very difficult to identify on chest X-rays so CT scan is a must to pick up this key feature of Askin’s tumour [Table/Fig-8] [10].

Askin’s tumour in nine-year-old male child. (a) Chest skiagram showing large homogenous round opacity in left upper and mid zones.(b) and (c) Coronal contrast enhanced CT scans showing large intensely enhancing homogenous soft tissue density mass with lobulated margins in left hemithorax having minimal necrotic component, coarse calcification (black arrow) and associated destruction of left 4th rib (white arrow), not evident in skiagram even in retrospect.(d) Axial contrast enhanced CT scans show soft tissue density solid lesion, also note mild left pleural and pericardial effusion.

Two cases of pulmonary blastoma in young children, showed large heterogenous solid-cystic mass lesions with adjacent lung atelectesis and no effusion or rib changes on CT scan. These features were though non-specific but matched closely with those mentioned by Khan AA et al., [Table/Fig-9] [11].

Pulmonary blastoma in three-year-old male child. (a) Chest skiagram showing large homogenous opacity in right mid and lower zones with left sided mediastinal shifting. (b) and (c). Axial and coronal contrast enhanced CT scans showing large intensely enhancing heterogenous soft tissue density mass with extensive necrosis in right hemithorax and mass effect as evidenced by diaphragmatic flattening(white arrow) and left sided mediastinal shifting.

Two pleural lesions have been included in the study having features typical of solitary fibrous tumours i.e., peripheral location, heterogenous solid masses with minimal effusion and no calcification/rib changes on CT scan. Literature has described homogeneity in smaller tumours and heterogeneity appearing with increasing size in larger lesions due to haemorrhage and necrosis [Table/Fig-10] [12].

Solitary fibrous tumour in 44-year-old female. (a). Chest skiagram showing large round opacity in right lower zone.(b) and (c) Axial and coronal contrast enhanced CT scans showing heterogenous soft tissue density mass lesion in right hemithorax showing small necrotic areas and few foci of calcification, no effusion present. Mass effect of solid lesion is evident as diaphragmatic flattening on coronal images (black arrow).

Another large mass with unusual diagnosis on histopathology was Schwannoma. The CT scan showed all non-specific features like smoothly marginated homogenous extrapulmonary mass lesion in left apical region, with speck of calcification at periphery and no associated pleural effusion/bony changes. Patient further underwent contrast MRI for soft tissue characterisation. Similar findings has also been reported in literature by Ravikanth R [13,14]

Intense enhancing component on CT scan was yet another characteristic feature which was significantly associated with non-bronchogenic tumours.

Finally, the mass with most unusual diagnosis on histopathology was solitary metastasis from mucinous adenocarcinoma of colon whose CT scan showed large heterogenous mass having coarse calcification and cystic component alongwith complete atelectesis of ipsilateral lung and minimal pleural effusion. This was not confidently diagnosed as metastasis on imaging owing to its unusual imaging pattern i.e., large size and solitary lesion, although previous literature has also mentioned a whole spectrum of unusual findings on CT for lung metastases including those found in the case included in this study [Table/Fig-11] [15].

Solitary metastasis in thirty six-year-old female (known case of mucinous carcinoma of colon). (a). Non contrast CT scan showing large heterogenous mass lesion in left hemithorax with coarse calcific focus (black arrow). (b) and (c) Axial and Coronal contrast enhanced CT scans showing large intensely predominantly peripherally enhancing soft tissue density mass with cystic component and associated minimal left pleural and mild pericardial effusion.

Limitation(s)

Limitations of this study are that it is single institute study with a small sample size. So, the conclusions drawn need to be validated by larger studies before applying it to the general population.

Conclusion(s)

Thus, to conclude, it can be safely suggested that on encountering an opaque hemithorax on chest X-ray and a large mass on CT (with no signs of local invasion or significant pleural effusion or distant metastasis), one should specifically look for some salient characteristic imaging features like the presence of intra-tumoural vessels, subtle rib destruction, coarse calcification, intensely enhancing soft tissue component on CT scan. These imaging characteristics if present, may alert us towards an uncommon diagnosis which may be suggested right away at imaging, while histopathology report is still being awaited. This study however, paves way for future study and research and tends to encourage radiologists to keep unusual and less frequent yet very important differentials in day to day clinical practice.

Necrosis (+++)-extensive, SFT: Solitary fibrous tumour; Add.: Additional; LAP: Lymphadenopathy*Masses with indeterminate originHPE: Histopathological examination; CT: Computed tomography; M: Male; F: Female; R: Right; L: Left; SFT: Solitary fibrous tumourCT: Computed tomographyp-value=0.0006 (Extremely statistically significant), calculated via Fischer’s-exact testp-value= 0.004 (Very statistically significant), calculated via Fischer’s-exact testCT: Computed Tomographyp-value=0.0137 (Statistically significant), calculated via Fischer’s-exact test

References

[1]Santos MK, Sommer G, Puderbach M, Safi S, Schnabel PA, Kauczor HU, Primary intrathoracic malignant mesenchymal tumours: Computed tomography features of a rare group of chest neoplasms Insights Imaging 2014 5:237-44.10.1007/s13244-013-0306-024407922  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H, Nakata H, Kasai T, Hashimoto H, Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: Correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival Radiology 2001 220(3):803-09.10.1148/radiol.220300170111526285  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Dillman JR, Pernicano PG, McHugh JB, Attili AK, Mourany B, Pinsky RW, Cross-sectional imaging of primary thoracic sarcomas with histopathologic correlation: A review for the radiologist Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2010 39(1):17-29.10.1067/j.cpradiol.2009.02.00119931110  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Bhatia K, Ellis S, Unusual lung tumours: An illustrated review of CT features suggestive of this diagnosis Cancer Imaging 2006 6(1):72-82.10.1102/1470-7330.2006.001316829468  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Hollings N, Shaw P, Diagnostic imaging of lung cancer Eur Respir J 2002 19(4):722-42.10.1183/09031936.02.0028000211999004  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Carter BW, Glisson BS, Truong MT, Erasmus JJ, Small cell lung carcinoma: Staging, imaging, and treatment considerations Rad Graph 2014 34(6):1707-21.10.1148/rg.34614017825310425  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Frazier AA, Franks TJ, Pugatch RD, Galvin JR, Pleuropulmonary synovial sarcoma Rad Graph 2006 26(3):923-40.10.1148/rg.26305521116702463  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Kim GH, Kim MY, Koo HJ, Song JS, Choi CM, Primary pulmonary synovial sarcoma in a tertiary referral center: Clinical characteristics, CT, and 18F-FDG PET findings, with pathologic correlations Medicine 2015 94(34):e139210.1097/MD.000000000000139226313782  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Keehn B, Jorgensen SA, Towbin AJ, Towbin R, Askintumour Appl Radiol 2017 46(6):32-33.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Ablin DS, Azouz EM, Jain KA, Large intrathoracic tumours in children: Imaging findings AJR 1995 165(4):925-34.10.2214/ajr.165.4.76769947676994  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Khan AA, El-Borai AK, Alnoaiji M, Pleuropulmonary Blastoma: A case report and review of the literature Case Rep Path 2014 (14):01-06.10.1155/2014/50908625177506  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Marc P, Fischer S, Brundler M-A, Sekine Y, Keshavjee S, Solitary fibrous tumours of the pleura Ann Thorac Surg 2002 74(1):285-93.10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03374-4  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Ravikanth R, A rare case of primary benign schwannoma of the pleura Digit Med 2017 3(1):36-38.10.4103/digm.digm_31_16  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Mathew B, Purandare NC, Shah S, Puranik A, Agrawal A, Rangarajan V, Lung masses of unusual histologies mimicking malignnacy: Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography appearance Indian J Nucl Med 2019 34(4):295-301.10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_116_1931579235  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Seo JB, Im J-G, Goo JM, Chung MJ, Kim M-Y, Atypical pulmonary metastases: Spectrum of radiologic findings Rad Graph 2001 21:403-17.10.1148/radiographics.21.2.g01mr1740311259704  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]