JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/46750.14365
Year : 2020 | Month : Dec | Volume : 14 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : SC11 - SC14

Vitamin D Status in Mothers and their Newborns at a Tertiary Care Centre in Mumbai: A Cross-sectional Study

Avinash L Sangle1, Amol P Jaybhaye2, Ravindra Y Chittal3, Deepak Ugra4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
2 Paediatrician, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
3 Paediatrician, Department of Paediatrics, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
4 Paediatrician, Department of Paediatrics, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Avinash L Sangle, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: dr.avinashsangle@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Indian population has a paradoxically high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. Maternal vitamin D levels are related to outcomes of pregnancy for mother and foetus. To understand the need for screening and appropriate management decisions, data is needed from various regions of India to explore the magnitude of the problem.

Aim

To evaluate the vitamin D levels in pregnant mothers and their newborns at a hospital catering to the affluent population in Mumbai.

Materials and Methods

A cross-divtional study was conducted from August to December 2012. A 100 women of Indian origin, between 20-45 years of age and their newborns who were delivered at the Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre in Mumbai were included. Determination of 25 hydroxy (OH) vitamin D, serum calcium, albumin concentration was done in mothers just before delivery and newborns venous cord blood at the time of delivery. Pearson’s correlation test was used for determining relation between maternal and newborns vitamin D levels and Chi-square test for association of maternal vitamin D levels with their sun exposure and newborns birth weight.

Results

The distribution of serum 25 (OH) vitamin D status in mothers was 75 deficient (75%), 13 insufficient (13%) and 12 sufficient (12%). Mean serum 25 (OH) vitamin D in mothers was 15.09 ng/mL. The distribution of serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels in newborns were 78 deficient (78%), 13 insufficient (13%) and 9 sufficient (9%). Mean serum 25 (OH) vitamin D in neonates was 13.82 ng/mL. There was strong correlation between maternal and newborns serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels with a Pearson correlation coefficient value of 0.94 and the p-value of <0.001.

Conclusion

There was a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant mothers associated with hypovitaminosis D in newborns in this hospital-based study catering to affluent population from Mumbai.

Keywords

Introduction

Evidence is emerging of the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency as reflected by low 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels among Indians predisposing them to bone mineral metabolic imbalance. Skin pigmentation, cultural habits causing little sun exposure, dietary factors, pollution have been suggested as possible reasons for the deficiency [1-5]. Systematic reviews have found a relationship between insufficient 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels during pregnancy and adverse outcomes for mothers as well as neonates [6,7]. Vitamin D deficiency screening is not a part of routine antenatal screening in India and data is needed from various regions of the country to understand the magnitude of the problem and devise appropriate mitigation strategies. The present study evaluates the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant mothers and their newborns at a hospital in Mumbai catering to the affluent population from the region.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was done at the Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology at Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre in Mumbai. Latitude of Mumbai is 18° North. Study was done from August to November 2012 i.e., monsoon and winter months.

Sample size of 85 was estimated for finding a correlation of 0.3 and above between maternal and newborns vitamin D levels with 80% power of study at 5% alpha error. A 100 women and their newborns who were delivered at the hospital were included in this cross-sectional study. All the subjects gave informed consent for the enrollment. The study design was approved by the Ethics committee at Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai (vide letter J5272 dated 14 August 2012).

Mothers of Indian origin, between 20-45 years of age with no history of any chronic disease or long-term treatment with drugs in the previous three months were included. Pregnant women with associated medical conditions such as Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension (PIH), Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), hypothyroidism were excluded from the study. The study included newborns of these mothers with completed 35 weeks of gestation who were healthy and did not required intensive care.

The demographic history such as name, age, height, weight and religion of mothers was documented. The obstetric history of all mothers included the type of conception, parity, calculated gestational age and number of abortions. The mothers reported whether they received any calcium and vitamin D supplements (apart from that incorporated in routine calcium formulations) during the pregnancy. Mothers also reported about the average daily hours of sun exposure, diet (vegetarian/non-vegetarian). We recorded the birth weight of newborns in kilograms, the length in centimetres, head circumference in centimetres on day 4. The weight was measured with a standard weighing scale and length by infantometer. The head circumference was measured with a measuring tape. Each woman delivered between 35 and 41 weeks of gestation after an uneventful pregnancy and gave birth to a singleton infant by spontaneous vaginal delivery or lower segment caesarean section. Gestational age was estimated by the date of the last menstrual period in weeks and days.

A sample of venous blood was taken from each woman at the time of vaginal delivery/lower segment caesarean section for the determination of serum calcium, 25 (OH) vitamin D, albumin concentration. Also, a sample of venous cord blood was taken from the infant for determination of serum calcium, 25 (OH) vitamin D, and albumin concentration.

Biochemical Measurements

All blood samples were centrifuged within an hour after collection. Plasma was separated and processed for analysis. The serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D was measured with Elecsys and Cobas C (Roche/Hitachi) immunoassay analyser using Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) method for assessing Vitamin D level. The measuring range of this method was 3.00-70.00 ng/mL (7.50-175 nmol/L). Conversion factors are nmol/L×0.40=ng/mL and ng/mL×2.50=nmol/L. Serum calcium, albumin was measured with Roche/Hitachi Cobas c system. The reference ranges and the interpretations of serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D in both mothers and newborns were: (a) Serum 25-OH <20 ng/mL: Vitamin D deficiency; (b) 21-29 ng/mL: Insufficiency, (c) ≥30 ng/mL: Sufficiency [8].

Statistical Analysis

Results were presented as frequencies, percentages for categorical variables, or means with Standard Deviations (SD) for continuous variables for mothers and newborns separately. The alpha error of 0.05 was considered for statistics. Pearson’s correlation coefficient assessed the relation between Vitamin D levels in mothers and their newborns. Chi-square test for association of maternal Vitamin D levels with their sun exposure and newborns birth weight.

Results

The Mean serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D in mothers was 15.09 ng/mL and Mean serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D in neonates was 13.82 ng/mL [Table/Fig-1,2]. The distribution of serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D status in mothers was 75% deficient, 13% insufficient and 12% sufficient. In this study, the religion of 79% of mothers was Hindu, 13% Muslim, 7% Christian and 1% Buddhist. Majority of the subjects being Hindu, the culture of purdah could not explain the high frequency of Vitamin D deficiency. The distribution of serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D levels in newborns was 78% deficient, 13% insufficient and 9% sufficient.

Maternal characteristics and laboratory parameters.

VariablesnMothers
MeanSDaMedianMinimumMaximum
Age (years)10031.094.443120.0045.00
Weight (kg)10074.0610.167450.90112.90
Height (cm)100161.036.12160150.00174.00
Serum calcium (mg/dL)1009.090.6696.111.1
Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D (ng/mL)10015.096.22133.0053.84
Serum albumin (mg/dL)1003.450.263.52.703.90

a: SD=Standard deviation


Neonatal characteristics and laboratory parameters.

VariablesnNewborns
MeanSDaMedianMinimumMaximum
Gestational age (days)100263.749.79262245.00288.00
Weight (kg)1002.910.4031.823.76
Length (cm)10048.591.604945.0053.00
Head circumference (cm)10033.361.213331.0036.00
Serum calcium (mg/dL)10010.180.99106.111.9
Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D (ng/mL)10013.8211.12113.0048.75
Serum albumin (mg/dL)1003.550.2742.604.30

a: SD=Standard deviation


Serum calcium was within normal range in 92% women. Hypercalcaemia was noticed in 3% women and hypocalcaemia in 5% women. In neonates, serum calcium was within normal range in 95% and lower in 5% cases.

Serum albumin was normal in 59% of mothers and lower than normal range in 41% of mothers. Almost all i.e., 99% of newborns had low serum albumin levels and 1% had normal serum albumin.

About 87% of mothers had a natural conception, whereas 13% had IVF conception. About 49% of mothers were primigravida, and 51% were multigravida. Primipara mothers were 70% and 30% were multipara. Twenty-six mothers had a prior single abortion; seven mothers had earlier two abortions while two of the mothers had three abortions. Sixty-five mothers had no history of abortion.

Only four mothers (4%) had >4 hours/day of daily sun exposure. Fifty-five mothers (55%) reported less than 2 hours/day of sun exposure and 41 mothers (41%) had 2 to 4 hours/day of sun exposure.

Around 72% of mothers were non-vegetarian, and 28% were vegetarian. Only 5% of mothers received the oral Vitamin D Supplements 3,00,000 IU (5 doses of 60,000 IU soft gels) in addition to that incorporated in calcium supplement formulations.

The correlation between maternal and newborns serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D levels with a Pearson correlation coefficient value of 0.94 and the p-value of <0.001 which indicates strong and statistically significant correlation (S) [Table/Fig-3]. The analysis of data reflected the moderate correlation between maternal and newborns serum calcium levels with a Pearson correlation coefficient value of 0.43 and the p-value of <0.001, which shows a statistically significant relationship.

Correlation of maternal serum vitamin D and newborns serum vitamin D levels.

The comparison between serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D levels in mothers and birth weight in newborns found no statistically significant association [Table/Fig-4]. The association between maternal serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D levels and daily hours of sun exposure (up to 2 hours vs >2 hours) was statistically significant [Table/Fig-5]. The five mothers who received 3,00,000 IU Vitamin D supplements were all found to be Vitamin D sufficient. The comparison between serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D levels in mothers and gestational age found no statistically significant association [Table/Fig-6].

Comparison of serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels in mothers and birth weight in newborns.

Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin DBirth weightTotal
Low (<2.5 kg)Normal (≥2.5 kg)
Sufficient11112
Insufficient31013
Deficient175875
Total2179100
Chi-Square testChi-statisticDegrees of freedomp-valueAssociation is not significant
1.3220.517

Comparison of daily sun exposure and serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D levels in mothers.

Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin DSun exposureTotal
0-2 hours/day>2 hours/day
Sufficient3912
Insufficient10313
Deficient423375
Total5545100
Chi-Square testChi-statisticDegrees of freedomp-valueAssociation is significant
6.9220.031

Comparison of gestational age and serum 25 (OH) vitamin D levels in mothers.

Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin DGestational ageTotal
Late preterm (35-36.6 weeks)Term (37-41.6 weeks)
Sufficient4812
Insufficient31013
Deficient255075
Total3268100
Chi-Square testChi-statisticDegrees of freedomp-valueAssociation is not significant
0.54720.761

Discussion

The study results show a very high percentage of pregnant mothers with hypovitaminosis D as well as lower vitamin D levels in newborns. There was a strong, statistically significant relationship between maternal and neonatal vitamin D levels. These findings from a hospital catering to affluent population from the financial capital of India indicate the gravity of the vitamin D problem in the region. We did not find the birth weight to be related to vitamin D levels; however, the study was not powered for the analysis of this parameter. There has been a strengthening of evidence regarding the impact of vitamin D on maternal and foetal outcomes. Hypovitaminosis D in pregnant mothers has been reported to be associated with increased risk of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, bacterial vaginosis in mothers; and small for gestational age and low birth weight babies [6,7,9,10]. Zheng J et al., study has reported that vitamin D deficiency in mothers can lead to metabolic syndrome in offspring, which may be amenable to the correction of vitamin D deficiency [11]. Maternal vitamin D deficiency adversely affects the musculoskeletal development in the child that can manifest up to early childhood in the form of lower bone mineral content, density and muscle mass. Vitamin D deficiency correction in mother can provide long-term benefit in the prevention of osteoporotic fracture in childhood [12-16]. Thorsteinsdottir F et al., studied Danish case cohorts born between 1992-2002 (D-Tect study). They highlighted the importance of prenatal and neonatal vitamin D status in the healthy immune system and lung development. They suggested that higher vitamin D levels in neonates may reduce the risk of developing asthma at ages 3-9 years in children [17]. Our study results are in line with other Indian studies reporting a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant mothers and correlation with neonatal vitamin D levels. [Table/Fig-7] highlights the list and findings of similar Indian studies [14,15,18-21].

Indian studies related to Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant mothers [14,15,18-21].

Author/s and year publishedRegionNumber of subjects and present study related parametersFindings
Krishnaveni GV et al., [14], 2011Mysore, Karnataka, South IndiaSerum (25 (OH) D) at 28-32 weeks’ in 568 pregnant womenThe median 25 (OH) D was 39.0 nmol/L; of which 379 (67%) mothers had vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L).
Marwaha RK et al., [18], 2011Delhi541 pregnant women of low socio-economic strata recruited for vitamin D evaluation across trimesters and postpartum 6 weeks, serum 25 (OH) vitamin D evaluated in 341 mother infant pairsMean serum 25 (OH) D levels was 23.3±12.2 nmol/L. 96.3% vitamin D deficient mothers (vitamin D <50 nmol/L). Strong correlation of vitamin D levels in mother infant pairs (r=0.779, p=0.0001). High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency across trimesters and postpartum.
Sachan A et al., [19], 2005Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, North India207 urban and rural pregnant women, serum 25 (OH) D and serum calcium, serum 25 (OH) vitamin D evaluated in cord blood of 117 newbornsMean maternal 25 (OH) D: 14±9.3 ng/mL, mean cord blood 25 (OH) D: 8.4±5.7 ng/mL. Vitamin D deficiency (<22.5 ng/mL) was 84.3% in pregnant urban women and 83.6% in rural women. Strong correlation of vitamin D levels in mother infant pairs (r=0.79, p<0.001).
Jani R et al., [20], 2014Mumbai, Maharashtra, Western IndiaSerum 25 (OH) D was measured in 150 pregnant women.All pregnant women 25 (OH) D levels <30.00 ng/mL. Nonaffluent women had lower 25 (OH) D levels than the affluent women (β=-0.20; p=0.03).
Farrant HJW et al., [21], 2009Mysore, Karnataka, South IndiaSerum 25 (OH) D at 30 weeks’ gestation in 559 women. The babies’ anthropometry parameters were evaluated.Median 25 (OH) D: 37.8 nmol/L. Hypovitaminosis D (<20 ng/mL) in 97% women. No association with newborns anthropometry.
Sarma D et al., [15], 2018Guwahati, Assam, Northeast India250 primigravida pregnant women 18-40 years of age in the third trimester and their newborns were evaluated for vitamin D3 levels, association with neonatal skeletal outcomes.Hypovitaminosis D (<30 ng/mL) in 60% of pregnant mothers and newborns (62.4%). Mean levels were 17.51±2.24 ng/mL and 14.51±1.8 ng/mL among the Hypovitaminosis D mothers and their neonates respectively. Adverse skeletal outcomes in neonates of hypovitaminosis D mothers.
Present studyMumbai, Maharashtra, Western IndiaSerum 25 (OH) D was measured in 100 pregnant women and their newborns.Hypovitaminosis D (<30 ng/mL) in 88% of pregnant mothers and 91% newborns. Strong correlation between maternal and neonatal vitamin D levels (0.94, p<0.001).

With the available research data, hypovitaminosis D appears to be a widespread problem in pregnant mothers and neonates across India. Still, there is a lack of clear guidelines for its management. Endocrine society global guidelines state that pregnant and lactating mothers comprise a high risk group that should be screened for vitamin D deficiency and routinely given vitamin D supplementation [22]. However, American College of Gynaecologists committee on obstetric practice opines that although severe deficiency of vitamin D in mothers is known to be associated with adverse skeletal outcomes in newborns, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend screening of all pregnant women for deficiency of vitamin D [23]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines (2016) do not recommend vitamin D supplementation in pregnant mothers for improvement in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on a Cochrane review. WHO recommends advising pregnant women for adequate sunlight exposure and proper nutrition, however, pregnant women with documented vitamin D deficiency are recommended to take supplements of 200 IU, i.e., five micrograms per day [24,25]. Sufficient vitamin D via adequate sun exposure in pregnant women is not feasible in India due to cultural issue of clothing, skin pigmentation, scorching uncomfortable heat, use of sunscreens, atmospheric pollution and overcrowding. Dietary intake of vitamin D is also impacted due to choice of food like vegetarianism, high phytate content of food, high caffeine consumption, cooking practices, and low calcium diet [4,8]. With the lack of guidelines regarding vitamin D screening and supplementation during the antenatal period in India and reports of vitamin D deficiency being a widespread public health concern, there is a need for extensive multicentric studies across the country for proper assessment of the problem and evidence-based recommendations.

Limitation(s)

The study had limitations that serum parathormone was not measured; dietary details are lacking; seasonal variations are not reflected as the study duration was four months. The sample is from a single hospital from Mumbai and generalisation of the findings is not possible.

Conclusion(s)

To conclude, the study results add to the accumulating evidence of a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant mothers and newborns, which needs further evaluation and response.

Declaration: The financial support for the project was granted by Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, Lilavati Hospital, A-791, Bandra Reclamation (W), Mumbai-400050.

a: SD=Standard deviationa: SD=Standard deviation

References

[1]Agarwal KS, Mughal MZ, Upadhyay P, Berry JL, Marwer EB, Puliyel JM, The impact of atmospheric pollution on vitamin D status of infants and toddlers in Delhi, India Arch Dis Child 2002 87:111-13.10.1136/adc.87.2.11112138058  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Arya V, Bhambari R, Godbole MM, Mithal A, Vitamin D status and its relationship with bone mineral density in healthy Asian Indians Osteoporosis Int 2004 1:56-61.10.1007/s00198-003-1491-313680103  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Goswami R, Gupta N, Goswami D, Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Kochupillai N, Prevalence and significance of low 25-hydroxy D concentrations in healthy subjects in Delhi Am J Clin Nutr 2000 72:472-75.10.1093/ajcn/72.2.47210919943  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Harinarayan CV, Ramalakshmi T, Prasad UV, Sudhakar D, Srinivasarao PV, Sarma KV, High prevalence of low dietary calcium, high phytate consumption, and vitamin D deficiency in healthy south Indians Am J Clin Nutr 2007 85:1062-67.10.1093/ajcn/85.4.106217413106  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Harinarayan CV, Akhila H, Modern India and the tale of twin nutrient deficiency-calcium and vitamin d-nutrition trend data 50 years-retrospect, introspect, and prospect Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019 10:49310.3389/fendo.2019.0049331447775  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Kaludjerovic J, Vieth R, Relationship between vitamin D during perinatal development and health J Midwifery Womens Health 2010 55:550-60.10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.02.01620974417  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Aghajafari F, Nagulesapillai T, Ronksley PE, Tough SC, O’Beirne M, Rabi DM, Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies BMJ 2013 346:f116910.1136/bmj.f116923533188  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Ritu G, Gupta A, Vitamin D deficiency in India: Prevalence, causalities and interventions Nutrients 2014 6(2):729-75.10.3390/nu602072924566435  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Taneja A, Gupta S, Kaur G, Jain NP, Kaur J, Kaur S, Vitamin D: Its deficiency and effect of supplementation on maternal outcome J Assoc Physicians India 2020 68(3):47-50.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Gilani S, Janssen P, Maternal vitamin D levels during pregnancy and their effects on maternal-fetal outcomes: a systematic review J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019 Dec 21 :piiS1701-2163(19)30847-310.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.01331874818  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Zheng J, Liu X, Zheng B, Zheng Z, Zhang H, Zheng J, Maternal 25-Hydroxyvitamin D deficiency promoted metabolic syndrome and downregulated Nrf2/CBR1 pathway in offspring Front Pharmacol 2020 11:9710.3389/fphar.2020.0009732184720  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Nabulsi M, Mahfoud Z, Maalouf J, Arabi A, Fuleihan GE, Impact of maternal veiling during pregnancy and socioeconomic status on offspring’s musculoskeletal health Osteoporos Int 2008 19:295-302.10.1007/s00198-007-0459-017767368  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Javaid MK, Crozier SR, Harvey NC, Gale CR, Dennison EM, Boucher BJ, Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at 9 years; a longitudinal study Lancet 2006 367:36-43.10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67922-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Winder NR, Hill JC, Noonan K, Boucher BJ, Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and body composition and cardiovascular risk markers in Indian children: The Mysore Parthenon Study Am J Clin Nutr 2011 93(3):628-35.10.3945/ajcn.110.00392121228264  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Sarma D, Saikia UK, Das DV, Fetal skeletal size and growth are relevant biometric markers in Vitamin D deficient mothers: A North East India prospective cohort study Indian J Endocr Metab 2018 22:212-16.10.4103/ijem.IJEM_652_1729911034  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Viljakainen HT, Saarnio E, Hytinantti T, Miettinen M, Surcel H, Mäkitie O, Maternal vitamin D status determines bone variables in the newborn J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010 95(4):1749-57.10.1210/jc.2009-139120139235  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Thorsteinsdottir F, Cardoso I, Keller A, Stougaard M, Frederiksen P, Cohen AS, Neonatal vitamin D status and risk of asthma in childhood: Results from the D-Tect study Nutrients 2020 12(3):84210.3390/nu1203084232245170  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Marwaha RK, Tandon N, Chopra S, Agarwal N, Garg MK, Sharma B, Vitamin D status in pregnant Indian women across trimesters and different seasons and its correlation with neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels Br J Nutr 2011 106(9):1383-89.10.1017/S000711451100170X21736816  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Sachan A, Gupta R, Das V, Agarwal A, Awasthi PK, Bhatia V, High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their newborns in northern India Am J Clin Nutr 2005 81:1060-64.10.1093/ajcn/81.5.106015883429  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Jani R, Palekar S, Munipally T, Ghugre P, Udipi S, Widespread 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in affluent and nonaffluent pregnant Indian women Biomed Res Int 2014 2014:892162Epub 2014 Jun 1810.1155/2014/89216225045711  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Farrant HJW, Krishnaveni GV, Hill JC, Boucher BJ, Fisher DJ, Noonan K, Vitamin D insufficiency is common in Indian mothers but is not associated with gestational diabetes or variation in newborn size European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009 63(5):646-52.10.1038/ejcn.2008.1418285809  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011 96(7):1911-30.Epub 2011 Jun 6. Erratum in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Dec;96(12):390810.1210/jc.2011-038521646368  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Vitamin D: Screening and supplementation during pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 495. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2011 118:197-98.10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f06b21691184  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. 2016 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf?sequence=1 Accessed 31 March 2020  [Google Scholar]

[25]De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Lombardo LK, Peña Rosas JP, Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 (1):CD00887310.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub326765344  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]