JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Oncology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45918.14359
Year : 2020 | Month : Dec | Volume : 14 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : XC01 - XC04

Exploring the Unexplored: Circulating Micromegakaryocytes in Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia

Pallavi Sinha1, Sarika Singh2, Lity Dhar3, Sunita Aggarwal4

1 Resident, Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India.
2 Professor, Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India.
3 Resident, Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India.
4 Professor, Department of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Sarika Singh, House No. 97B, Block C, Express New Apartmens, Sector-105, G.B. Nagar, Noida-201304, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sarikasingh97b@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) is a clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorder characterised by balanced chromosomal translocation called the Philadelphia chromosome. It is clinically divided into Chronic Phase (CP), Accelerated Phase (AP), and Blast Crisis (BC). Disease is seen associated with leukocytosis and myeloid bulge in the peripheral smear. Sighting of circulating Micromegakaryocytes in peripheral smear in CML, is a known entity but long forgotten and a finding not well explored to depend on. They are dysplastic, small megakaryocytes with increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and hypolobated nuclei, at times seen with pinching off platelets though being dysplastic. Besides CML, micromegakaryocytes are also observed in myelodysplasia, and other myeloid neoplasms.

Aim

To assess the frequency of Circulating Micromegakaryocytes in CML in North Indian population and to observe its correlation with clinical staging.

Materials and Methods

This cross-divtional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, from July 2017-July 2018. Forty-five newly diagnosed cases of CML, with median age being 37 years, were included in the study. Of these 22 were males and 23 females. Micromegakaryocytes were identified on peripheral smear stained by Giemsa and by CD61 immunostaining. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 24. Pearson Chi-square was used to calculate p-value. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation was calculated as Pearson correlation coefficient formula.

Results

Micromegakayocytes were found in 37 (82%) cases, out of which 20 (54%) were in CP, 8 (22%) in AP and 9 (24%) in BC. Anaemia was present in 42 (93%) cases. Mean value of micromegakaryocytes were highest in BC (2.6) and lowest in CP (0.57). There was significant positive correlation of micromegakaryocytes with bone marrow fibrosis (p=0.01). There was no significant correlation of micromegakaryocytes with splenomegaly (p=0.41) and basophil count (p=0.79).

Conclusion

Micromegakaryocytes and cytoplasmic fragments of micromegakaryocytes are found in CML in Indian population. There was significant correlation of circulating megakaryocytes with progressive phase and marrow fibrosis. However, study on large number of subjects is needed for better correlation.

Keywords

Introduction

The CML is a clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorder that affects cells of all three lineages. It is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterised by balanced chromosomal translocation called the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. CML progresses in stages termed CP, AP and BC. CML-CP is characterised by leucocytosis with myeloid cell bulge and maintained terminal differentiation accompanied by basophilia and eosinophilia. Blast count is <2% of total leucocyte count. Platelet count may be normal or increased. Marked thrombocytopenia is uncommon in CP [1]. WHO 2016 recommends the defining criteria for CML-AP which are persistent or increasing leucocyte count (>10×109/L), persistent or increasing splenomegaly, persistent thrombocytosis (>1000×109/L), persistent thrombocytopenia (<100×109/L), basophils in peripheral blood ≥20%, 10-19% blast in peripheral blood or bone marrow and additional clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph chromosome [1,2]. Presence of >20% blasts in blood or bone marrow or the presence of extramedullary proliferations of blasts defines CML-BC [1,2].

CML is the most common Leukaemia in Indian adult population [3]. CML accounts for 30-60% of all adult Leukaemia in India [3]. Annual incidence reported worldwide is 1-2 cases per 100000 population [2]. The median age of diagnosis in Europe is 55 years and in American literature, median age reported is 66 years [4,5]. In India, the age of presentation is less and is reported to be in fourth decade [6,7]. There is slight male predominance, with male to female ratio varying from 1:08 to 3:1 in Indian literature [8,9]. Signs and symptoms in CML patients are splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, fatigue, weakness, weight loss, dragging pain, night sweats and anaemia. Most of the newly diagnosed patients present in CP are asymptomatic (50%) [2].

Micromegakaryocytes are observed in peripheral smear in CML, myelodysplasia, polycythemia vera and Hodgkins lymphoma [10,11]. They are dysplastic, small megakaryocytes with increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and hypolobated nuclei. At times seen with budding platelets through the cytoplasm despite being dysplastic. The platelet count is frequently elevated and the platelets on the blood film are often large and dysmorphic. Micromegakaryocytes in peripheral blood of CML patients have been rarely reported in western literature [12-14]. Though very little literature has been found, it is an observational finding that in Indian patients there is increased evidence of circulating micromegakaryocytes in CML [15]. Due to wide lacunae in existing literature, circulating micromegakaryocytes need to be studied in CML patients. The objectives of this study were to assess circulating micromegakaryocytes in different phases of CML and to observe its correlation with clinical and haematological parameters such as splenomegaly, blast count, basophilia and bone marrow fibrosis.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology and Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India after obtaining Ethical Clearance from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) numbered IEC/MAMC/ (80/08/2020/No 257). Ideal sample size using prevalence of micromegakaryocytes in CML as 47.8% was calculated as 95 (Z2pq/L2, Z=1.96, p=prevalence of micromegakaryocytes in CML, q=100-p, L=allowable error 10%). However, due to time and resource constraints 45 newly diagnosed CML patients visiting CML outpatient department were enrolled in the study.

Inclusion criteria: 45 newly diagnosed CML patients visiting CML Outpatient Department were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with other myeloproliferative neoplasm and patients of CML on chemotherapy were excluded from the study.

Seventeen patients were included retrospectively and 28 were included prospectively in the study. The diagnostic criteria were as per the WHO 2016, such as leukocytosis with myeloid bulge, with associated cytogenetic and molecular finding of Ph chromosome and or Breakpoint Cluster Region Abelson (BCR ABL) fusion gene by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) and/or Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) [1]. A detailed history was taken from each patient and thorough clinical examination was done for presence of hepato-splenomegaly. A written informed consent was obtained from all patients for their inclusion in the study. However, consent was waived-off from the patients included in the study retrospectively.

Two ml of peripheral blood was collected in EDTA vial. The EDTA sample was run within 2 hours of collection on an automated haematology analyser (XT 2000i), to obtain complete blood counts including Haemoglobin (Hb), Total Leukocyte Count (TLC), Red Blood Cell Count (RBC), Platelet count (Plt), and calculated Red cell indices and platelets indices. Two peripheral blood smears were made and one was stained with Giemsa. A 200 cell differential count was done on peripheral blood and micromegakaryocytes were identified morphologically and by CD61 (clone-2C9.G3, Thermo Scientific, RTU) immunostaining.

For CD61 immunostaining second Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS) was fixed in cold methanol and ethanol solution in the ratio of 1:1. The slides were then put in a coplin jar filled with 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6) and heated in microwave for 10 cycles of 3 minutes duration each accompanied by cooling in between 2 cycles which allowed unmasking of epitope. At the end of 10th cycle, 3 washes of PBS buffer was given. Then the slide was incubated overnight with CD61 at 4°C. Incubation with secondary (biotinylated goat anti-polyvalent antibody) and tertiary antibody (peroxidase labelled streptavidin peroxidase complex) was done for 30 minutes each followed by 3 washes of PBS buffer. Freshly prepared Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was applied on the slides and the reaction was monitored under microscope. The slides were counter stained with haematoxylin.

Bone marrow fibrosis was assessed on reticulin stain and was graded according to semi-quantitative bone marrow fibrosis grading system proposed by WHO 2016 [16]. Bone marrow fibrosis was assessed in only 20 cases (due to nonavailability of bone marrow biopsy in all cases).

Statistical Analysis

Data was compiled in Excel and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 24. Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD and categorical variables were presented as percentages. The statistical analysis was done using Pearson chi-square test. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation was calculated as Pearson correlation coefficient formula. Pearsons correlation coefficient (R) ranges from -1 to +1. Negative value implies negative correlation while positive value implies positive correlation.

Results

Forty five newly diagnosed patients of CML reporting to Maulana Azad Medical College were included in the study. Of these, 22 were males and 23 females with male to female ratio being 0.95:1. The age of patients ranged from 13 to 70 years with median age being 37 years. At presentation, 27 patients were in CP, 9 in AP and 9 in BC as per WHO criteria laid in blue book 2016 [1,2].

Anaemia (Hb <12 g/dL in females and <13 g/dL in males) was observed in 42 (93%) cases of CML. Out of this, 26 (61.9%) patients were in CP, 7 (16.6%) in AP, 9 (21%) in BC. Hyperleukocytosis (leucocytes count >1 lacs/microliter) was found in 23 (51%) patients. Blast count ranged from 0-7/100 WBCs in CP, 10-15/100 WBCs in AP and 22-45/100 WBCs in BC. There was significant positive correlation of micromegakaryocytes with blast count. (p=0.01, R=0.547). Basophil count ranged from 0-5/100 WBCs in CP, 0-6/100 WBCs in AP and 0-5/WBCs in BC. Thrombocytopenia was seen in 10 (22%) cases while thrombocytosis was seen in 11 (24%) cases of CML. Thrombocytopenia was seen in 3 (11.1%) patients with CP, 1 (11.1%) patient with AP and 6 (66.6%) patients with BC [Table/Fig-1]. Splenomegaly was observed in 43 (95%) patients, out of these 22 patients had moderate splenomegaly and 21 patients had massive splenomegaly. There was no significant correlation of splenomegaly (p=0.41) and basophil count (p=0.79) with micromegakaryocytes [Table/Fig-1].

Clinicohaematological parameters in different phases of CML.

Phases of CMLBlast Range (/100 WBCs)Basophil Range (/100 WBCs)Anaemia (N=42, 93%)TCP (n=10, 22%)TCS (n=11, 24%)LCS>1L (n=23)Splenomegaly (n=43, 95%)BM Fibrosis (n=20)
CP (n=27)0-70-52631014269/10
AP (n=9)10-150-6711484/4
BC (n=9)22-450-5960596/6

TCP: Thrombocytopenia; TCS: Thrombocytosis; LCS: Leucocytosis; BM: Bone marrow


Circulating micromegakaryocytes [Table/Fig-2a,b] were seen in 37 (82%) cases of CML out of which 20 (54%) were in CP, 8 (22%) in AP and 9 (24%) in BC. Twenty out of 27 (74%) patients with CP, 8/9 (89%) patient with AP and 9/9 (100%) patient with BC had circulating micromegakaryocytes. Range of micromegakaryocytes in CP was 0-2/100 WBC, with a mean of 0.57. Circulating micromegakaryocytes increased in AP (Range-0-3/100 WBC, mean-1.7) and BC (Range-0.5-5/100 WBCs, mean-2.6) [Table/Fig-3].

(a) Micromegakaryocytes are seen pinching of dysplastic platelets. (arrow) (Giemsa, 600x). (b) Micromegakaryocytes are seen pinching of dysplastic platelets. (arrow) (CD61, 1000x).

Correlation of circulating Micromegakaryocytes with different phases of CML.

Phases of CMLBlast range (No./100 WBCs)Zero mMgk/100 WBCs0.5 mMgk/100 WBCs1 mMgk/100 WBCs2 mMgk/100 WBCs3-5 mMgk/100 WBCsMean mMgk
CP (n=27)0-77118100.57
AP (n=9)10-15111511.7
BC (n=9)22-45011342.6

p=0.001, r-0.547 (Pearson chi-square test)

mMgk: micromegakaryocytes; WBCs: White blood cells


Bone marrow fibrosis was assessed in 20 cases, as biopsy was available in these cases only. Bone marrow fibrosis was detected in 19/20 (95%) cases with CML. Out of these, 9 were in CP with fibrosis ranging between grade 1-2, 4 in AP with fibrosis between grade 1-2, 6 in BC with fibrosis between grade1-3 [Table/Fig-4]. Six (60%) patients with Grade 1 Fibrosis had circulating micromegakaryocytes <0.5, while 7 (78%) patients with Grade 2/3 Fibrosis had ≥1/100 WBCs circulating micromegakaryocytes [Table/Fig-4]. There was significant increase in BM fibrosis as circulating micromegakaryocyte increased (p=0.01 and Pearson correlation=0.543).

Correlation of micromegakaryocytes with bone marrow fibrosis.

Number of Mmgk/100 WBCsNumber of patients with BMF grade 0Number of patients with BMF grade 1Number of patients with BMF grade 2Number of patients with BMF grade 3
01200
<0.50402
10211
20221
3-50011

p=0.01, r-0.543 (Pearson Chi-square test)

BMF: Bone marrow fibrosis; Mgk: Megakaryocyte, WBCs: White blood cells


Discussion

Appearance of megakaryocytes in peripheral blood is seen in various diseases like Myelogenous Leukaemia, Polycythemia Vera, myelodysplastic syndrome, hodgkins disease and some cases of sepsis [17]. It was suggested by George Minot for the first time in literature in early 1922 that appearance of megakaryocytes in peripheral blood in Myelogenous Leukaemia indicates an impending change in character of the disease [18].

Circulating micromegakaryocytes were seen in 82% cases of CML. Anand M et al., found circulating micromegakaryocytes in 47.8% patients. In this study, 74% patients with CP, 89% patients with AP and 100% patient with BC had circulating micromegakaryocytes. In a study by Anand M et al., 106/235 (45.1%), 41/65 (63.1%) and 8/24 (33.3%) patients in CP, AP and BC phases had circulating megakaryocytes. Present study shows that there is a significant increase in circulating micromegakaryocytes with increase in blast count (p<0.01 and Pearson correlation=0.547). Median value of micromegakaryocytes in CP, AP and BC was 0.5, 2 and 3. Median values of micromegakaryocytes in the study by Anand M et al., was 0.75% for CP, 2.0% for AP and 6.0% for BC, which is quite similar to present study [15].

Megakaryocytes in the peripheral blood appears slightly different from that present in bone marrow. Nucleus of the megakaryocytes present in peripheral blood gets stripped off from their cytoplasm, however some cytoplasm remains which are in process of differentiation towards platelets. Thus, in circulation micromegakaryocytes are seen pinching-off dysplastic platelets from the surface [Table/Fig-2a,b] [11]. In bone marrow, the megakaryocytes have abundant cytoplasm with pseudopods whose segmentation results in the formation of platelets. Nucleus in the bone marrow is more vesicular and lobulated. The nucleus of megakaryocytes seen in the peripheral blood are smaller and are of various shapes and sizes varying from mono nuclear to binuclear and stains very deeply and are hyperchromatic [17].

Anand M et al., described the morphology of circulating micromegakaryocytes in CP and BC of CML. In CP, the micromegakaryocytes are mature and small, lymphocyte-like cells with non-lobulated nucleus and scant cytoplasm. Platelets budding from the cytoplasm can be seen. However in BC, these micromegakaryotes are large lobulated granular or agranular cytoplasmic masses. These are connected by narrow bridges of cytoplasm coming-off from blasts. As the micromegakaryocytes mature, there is decrease in nuclear size and deepening of chromatin condensation [15].

It is advisable that all patients of CML should be screened routinely for circulating micromegakaryocytes in peripheral smear so as to predict their behaviour especially in Indian backdrop as patients in Indian settings show more pronounced leukocytosis, marrow fibrosis and behave in different manner than their western counterpart [15]. This is especially more important in resource constrained centers where molecular and flowcytometric follow-up of these patients is a limiting factor as this needs just morphological training. Megakaryocytes in the peripheral blood have been reported in very few studies [15,19]. However, megakaryocytic BC has been reported in some studies and case reports [20].

Limitation(s)

This study is limited due to its small sample size. CD61 immunostaining could not be done in all cases as few cases were collected retrospectively. Bone Marrow fibrosis was only studied in 20 cases and longitudinal data could not be assessed so as to more conclusively follow these patients for longer duration.

Conclusion(s)

Micromegakaryocytes and cytoplasmic fragments of micromegakaryocytes are found in peripheral blood in CML. With progressive phase and increase in blast count and marrow fibrosis circulating micromegakaryocytes increase in circulation thus predating the outcome of disease in substantial manner. This is in contrast to western data where micromegakaryocytes are not so profound in blood. However, a study on large number of subjects with longitudinal follow-up is needed for better correlation.

TCP: Thrombocytopenia; TCS: Thrombocytosis; LCS: Leucocytosis; BM: Bone marrowp=0.001, r-0.547 (Pearson chi-square test)mMgk: micromegakaryocytes; WBCs: White blood cellsp=0.01, r-0.543 (Pearson Chi-square test)BMF: Bone marrow fibrosis; Mgk: Megakaryocyte, WBCs: White blood cells

References

[1]Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukaemia Blood 2016 127(20):2391-405.10.1182/blood-2016-03-64354427069254  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Vardiman JW, Melo JV, Baccarani M, Radich JP, Thiele HM, Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia, in: S.H. Swerdlow, E. Campo, N.L. Harris, E.S. Jaffe, et al., (Eds.) WHO Classifification of Tumors of the Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2017 Revised edition, pp. 30-36   [Google Scholar]

[3]Bhutani M, Kochupillai V, In: Hematological malignancies in India Progress in Hematologic Oncology. Kumar L, editor 2003 New YorkPub. The Advanced Research Foundation New York:10  [Google Scholar]

[4]Tardieu S, Brun-Strang C, Berthaud P, Michallet M, Guilhot F, Rousselot P, Management of chronic myeloid Leukaemia in France: A multicentered cross-sectional study on 538 patients Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005 14(8):545-53.10.1002/pds.104615534856  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Cortes JE, Richard TS, Hagop K, In: Chronic myelogenous Leukaemia Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach 2007 10th ed. Padzur R, Coia LR, Hoskins WJ, Wagman LD, editorsLawrenceCMP Medica:789  [Google Scholar]

[6]Rajappa S, Varadpande L, Paul TR, Jacob RT, Digumarti R, Report of chronic myeloid Leukaemia in chronic phase from Dr.SenthilRajappa, 2002-2009 Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013 34(3):208-10.10.4103/0971-5851.12374524516313  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Agarwal MB, Agarwal UM, Rathi SS, Masurkar S, Zaveri B, Report of chronic myeloid Leukaemia in chronic phase from Ashirwad Hematology Centre, Mumbai, 2002-2009 Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013 34(3):199-203.10.4103/0971-5851.12374124516310  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Parikh P, Report of chronic myeloid Leukaemia in chronic phase from Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, 2002-2008 Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013 34(3):164-67.10.4103/0971-5851.12371624516299  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Deotare UR, Chudgar U, Bhagat E, Report of patients with chronic myeloid Leukaemia, from hematology clinic, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 2000-2010 at 1 stmyelostone meeting: Indian evidence of chronic myelogenous Leukaemia Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2013 34(3):193-95.10.4103/0971-5851.12373424516308  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Erber WN, Jacobs A, Oscier DG, O’Hea AM, Mason DY, Circulating micromegakaryocytes in myelodysplasia J Clin Pathol 1987 40(11):1349-52.10.1136/jcp.40.11.13493320097  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Anand M, Kumar R, Singh S, Megakaryoblastic lineage of peripheral blood blasts of CML blast crisis identified by budding dysplastic platelets Am J Hematol 2004 75(4):239-40.10.1002/ajh.2004115054817  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Anastasi J, Vardiman JW, Chronic myeloid Leukaemia and the chronic myeloprolifertive diseases, in: D.M. Knowles (Ed.) Neoplastic Hematopathology 2000 PhiladelphiaLippincott Williams and Wilkins:1745-90.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Graham SJ, Cotelingam JD, Chronic Leukaemias. in: HR. Schumacher, WA. Rock Jr., S.A. Stass (Eds.) Handbook of Hematologic Pathology 2000 New YorkMarcel Dekker  [Google Scholar]

[14]Kantarjian H, Keating M, Faderl S, Talpaz M, Chronic myeloid Leukaemia, in: VT. DeVita Jr, S. Hellman, SA. Rosenberg (Eds.) Cancer, Principles and Practice of Oncology 2001 PhiladelphiaLippincott Williams and Wilkins:2433-47.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Anand M, Hazarika B, Kumar L, Kumar R, Chopra A, High abundance of circulating megakaryocytic cells in chronic myeloid Leukaemia in Indian patients. Revisiting George Minot to re-interpret megakaryocytic maturation Blood Cells Mol Dis 2016 60:28-32.10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.05.00327519941  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Orazi A, Gianelli U, Barbui T, Barosi G, Primary Myelofibrosis, in: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, et al., (Eds.) WHO Classifification of Tumors of the Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2017 Revised edition :44-50.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Minot GR, Megacaryocytes in the peripheral circulation J Exp Med 1922 36(1):01-07.10.1084/jem.36.1.119868650  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Whitby L, The significance of megakaryocytes in the peripheral circulation Blood 1948 3(8):934-38.10.1182/blood.V3.8.934.93418873540  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Sharma S, Sharma P, Sachdeva MUS, Binota J, Sood A, Malhotra P, Circulating mature megakaryocytes in an unusual case of BCR-ABL1-positive CML Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2018 34:762-64.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0977-210.1007/s12288-018-0977-230369761  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Khemka R, Gupta M, Jena N, CML with megakaryocytic blast crisis: Report of 3 cases Pathol Oncol Res 2019 25(3):1253-58.10.1007/s12253-018-0484-730357754  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]