JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45082.14358
Year : 2020 | Month : Dec | Volume : 14 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : EC09 - EC09

Study to Evaluate HER2-neu Expression in Different Histopathological Grades of Prostatic Carcinoma in a Tertiary Care Centre, Bareilly

Surbhi Bansal1, Hema Pant2, Tanu Agrawal3, Piyush Kumar4, Pradeep Mehdiratta5

1 Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Professor, Department of Pathology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4 Professor and Head, Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
5 Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Hema Pant, Professor, Department of Pathology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: Panthema18@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the divond most common neoplasm among men around the world. Two routinely used immunocytochemical markers for prostatic epithelium are Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (PAP) and Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA). Various other markers like Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), androgen and progesterone receptors, HER2-neu, low molecular weight keratin, etc., are also used. HER2-neu overexpression has been implicated in tumorigenesis and has been correlated with a poor prognosis for patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and gastric cancer. Use of Trastuzumab for the treatment of breast carcinoma has improved prognosis in HER2-neu positive cases. Recent studies have suggested the correlation of HER2-neu overexpression with higher grades of prostate cancer.

Aim

To study HER2-neu expression in different histopathological grades of prostatic carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

A prospective study was carried out on 41 histopathologically proven cases of prostatic carcinoma in Pathology Department of SRMSIMS, Bareilly over a period of one year and six months (November 2017 to April 2019). Gleason grading and HER2-neu Immunohistochemistry was applied on every case and then correlated. Statistical tests were applied, statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.

Results

A 92.7% (38/41) cases were reported as Prostatic Adenocarcinoma of Non-Mucinous type. Total of 42.5% (17/40) were grouped under Grade group 5, 27.5% (11/40) cases under Grade group 3 and 10% (4/40) under Grade groups 1,2 and 4 each. Out of total, 14.6% (6/41) cases were considered as positive and 80.5% (33/41) cases were considered as negative for HER2-neu expression and 4.9% (2/41) cases were considered as equivocal (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) conformation required). In cases with positive HER2-neu expression, mean group grade was calculated to be 4.83±0.40 and in patients with negative HER2-neu expression, it was 3.38±1.40 (it was calculated to find correlation between group grade and HER2-neu expression). There was a significant statistical difference (p=0.00003668) found between the Gleason Group Grade in HER2-neu positive and negative patients as HER2-neu positivity is seen in higher group grades. One case was reported as neuroendocrine carcinoma in which Gleason grading was not done.

Conclusion

Compared to low Gleason Group Grade carcinoma, higher percentage of HER2-neu expression was seen in high Gleason Group grade carcinoma.

Keywords

Introduction

Worldwide, burden of prostatic carcinoma is expected to grow to 1.7 million new cases and 0.5 million new deaths by 2030 simply due to the growth and ageing of the global population. Incidence of prostate cancer is increasing due to changing lifestyles, increased awareness and access to medical facility. It is coming to the knowledge that we (India) are not very far behind from western countries [1]. True incidence of prostate cancer is not known for India as it is neither a notifiable disease nor much community-based studies are available [2].

Current medical treatment include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, cryosurgery, and other modalities. Usually, in a suspected case of prostate cancer, the use of biomarkers, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), PSA Velocity (PSA-V), percentage free PSA is done which can result in increased detection at an earlier stage and decreasing the number of metastatic patients.

The most common histologic type in prostate carcinoma is adenocarcinoma, followed by basal cell carcinoma, intraductal carcinoma, ductal adenocarcinoma and many more. Gleason grading International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP 2016) is used to grade prostatic carcinoma histologically and collectively a group grade is given based on primary and secondary Gleason score [3].

Various markers used in prostate carcinoma are PAP, PSA, PSMA, androgen and progesterone receptors, HER2-neu, low molecular weight keratins and many more [4].

HER2-neu is a member of the proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase receptor family that is localised to chromosome 17 and is homologous to the neu rat gene [5]. HER2-neu expression has been widely studied in a significant proportion of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and gastric cancer and better prognosis have been documented with the help of Trastuzumab (the humanised monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody) in the treatment of breast carcinoma.

There are studies about HER2-neu overexpression in prostatic carcinoma and many recent studies have suggested its importance in progression to a more aggressive disease [6]. So in this study, we aimed to assess the expression of HER2-neu in different histopathological grades of prostatic carcinoma in patients from a Tertiary Care Centre.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

A prospective study was carried out in the Department of Pathology of SRMSIMS, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, over a period of 18 months (November 2017 to April 2019) and included 41 histopathologically proven cases of prostatic carcinoma. Institutional Ethical Committee Clearance was obtained prior to the study. (IEC No. SRMSIMS/2017-18/108). All the Trans-Urethral Resection of Prostate (TURP)/ core biopsy specimen submitted to the department of pathology during the above mentioned period, were collected from the patients diagnosed as prostatic carcinoma, admitted under the department of surgery (urology) were included in the study. A Written consent was obtained from all the patients. All nonmalignant cases, inadequate biopsies and autolysed specimens were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated with the help of the formula

n=Z2(1-α/2) p(1-p)/d2

where Z2(1-α/2) = (1.96)2, d=0.01 and p=prevalence within institute is 10.7% according to which minimum number of cases calculated was 37 [7,8].

Study Procedure

A detailed clinical history was obtained from the patient records along with details of radiological investigations. All formalin fixed specimen were processed and were subjected to H&E stain. Stained sections were examined under light microscopy for histopathological diagnosis and tumour was classified according to the Gleason grading system according to ISUP 2016 [3].

Selected sections were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for HER2-neu. The Anti-HER2-neu antigen, IHC kit of BioGenex RTU was used. Positive (known HER2+breast carcinoma) and negative controls (primary antibody omitted) were used.

A golden brown membrane staining was considered as a positive reaction [Table/Fig-1].

Grading of the IHC staining for HER2-neu overexpression[4].

Staining patternScoreHER2-neu protein overexpression assessment
No staining observed or membrane staining observed in <10% of the tumour cells0Negative
A faint/barely perceptible membrane staining is detected in >10% of the tumour cells. The cells are only stained in part of their membrane+1Negative
Weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in >10% of the tumour cells+2Equivocal
Strong complete membrane staining observed in >30% of the tumour cells (formerly 10%)+3Strongly positive

A score of 3+ HER2-neu was considered positive for immunostaining, 2+ was considered equivocal while the score of 1+ and 0 were considered negative. If the immune test gives a result of 2+, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) was recommended which was not done due to non availability.

Data Compilation

Collected data include all 41 cases of prostatic carcinoma with their age, presenting complaints, ultrasonographic findings (wherever available), Serum PSA levels (wherever available), histological diagnosis, and HER2-neu expression, were compiled in pre-structured proforma and tabulated on Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for further analysis.

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and statistical tests (Student’s t test) were applied, statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.

Results

The study comprises 41 cases of histologically proven prostatic carcinoma, which was correlated with their age, histological type, histologic grade, Serum PSA levels, ultrasonographic findings and HER2-neu status.

Following observations were noted- Most common presenting symptom was retention of urine (30,73.1%), followed by obstructive and irritative voiding (13,31.7%), burning micturition (8,19.5%), haematuria (7,17.0%), dribbling of urine (6,14.6%) and abdominal pain (5,12.19%). Few other clinical complaints like generalised body ache, pain, and swelling in lower limbs, fever, anaemia were also noticed in some patients collectively contributing to 30% retention of urine [Table/Fig-2].

Different clinical presentations of patients.

Age wise distribution of prostate carcinoma is shown in [Table/Fig-3]. Out of 39 (in two cases ultrasound was not done) cases that were subjected to ultrasonography, almost similar number of cases i.e., 16 and 15 cases had grade III prostatomegaly and grade II prostatomegaly, respectively and there were four cases that had grade I and IV prostatomegaly each [Table/Fig-4].

Age wise distribution of prostate carcinoma.

S. No.Age group (years)No. of casesPercentage
141-5012.4
251-60512.2
361-701434.1
471-801741.5
581-9049.8
Range of distribution45-83 years
Mean age of presentation70.58 years
Standard deviation8.18 years

Distribution of cases based on Ultrasound findings.

S. No.USG findingNo. of cases (39)Percentage (%)
1Grade I Prostatomegaly410.2
2Grade II Prostatomegaly1538.5
3Grade III Prostatomegaly1641.1
4Grade IV Prostatomegaly410.2

Only thirty of the forty-one cases had S. PSA levels measured before the biopsy/surgery. It was observed that the maximum number of cases that were 28 had S. PSA levels of >20 ng/mL. S. PSA levels of one case each fall in the category of <4 ng/mL and 4-11 ng/mL, respectively. None of them had the S. PSA levels of 11-20 ng/mL. In eleven cases S. PSA levels were not available [Table/Fig-5].

Distribution of cases based on Serum PSA level.

Comparison of mean age, mean S. PSA levels and mean Gleason Group Grade based on over expression of HER2-neu is shown in [Table/Fig-6].

Comparison of mean age, mean S. PSA levels and mean Gleason Group Grade based on over Expression of HER2-neu.

Out of forty-one cases, the maximum number of cases i.e., 92.7% (38/41) was reported as prostatic adenocarcinoma of nonmucinous type. A 2.43% (1/41) cases were reported as mucinous adenocarcinoma and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma each respectively. One (2.43%) case even reveals squamous differentiation [Table/Fig-7,8,9,10 and 11].

Distribution of cases according to histological type.

a) Prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason 3+3=6 (H&E,100x). b) Prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason 4+4=8 (H&E,400x).

(a) Prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason 4+4=8: Cribriform Pattern (H&E,400x). (b) Prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason 5 +5=10: Solid Pattern (H&E,100x).

a) Prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason 5+5=10: Comedonecrosis (H&E,100x). b) Mucinous Prostatic adenocarcinoma (H&E,400x).

Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (H&E,400x).

[Table/Fig-12] shows distribution of cases as per Gleason grading system. One case was reported as neuroendocrine carcinoma in which Gleason grading was not done (but was included in the study because as per topic we have to include all prostatic carcinoma cases). As shown in [Table/Fig-13], 42.5% were grouped under grade group 5, 27.5% under grade group 3, Four (10%) cases were grouped under grade groups 1,2 and 4 each.

Distribution of cases according to Gleason grading.

S. No.Gleasons gradingNo. of cases (40)Percentage (%)
16 (3+3)410
27 (3+4)410
37 (4+3)1127.5
48 (4+4)410
58 (3+5)00
68 (5+3)00
79 (4+5)1025
89 (5+4)615
910 (5+5)12.5
10TOTAL40100
One case was reported as neuroendocrine carcinoma in which gleason grading was not done

Distribution of cases according to Grade grouping.

S. No.Grade GroupsNo. of cases (40)Percentage (%)
1Grade Group 16 (3+3)410
2Grade Group 27 (3+4)410
3Grade Group 37 (4+3)1127.5
4Grade Group 48 (3+5)410
8 (5+3)
8 (4+4)
5Grade Group 59 (5+4)1742.5
9 (4+5)
10 (5+5)
6Total40100
One case was reported as neuroendocrine carcinoma in which gleason grading was not done

A 14.6% cases show a membrane positivity of +3 [Table/Fig-14a] and thus they were considered as positive and in 80.5% cases were negative [Table/Fig-14b] for HER2-neu expression. A 4.9% cases demonstrated +2 [Table/Fig-14c] membrane positivity which is considered as equivocal and needs to be confirmed with the help of FISH method. Due to the unavailability of FISH method these two cases were considered as unequivocal and were kept separately [Table/Fig-15].

HER2-neu expression(400x); 3+: Strong complete membrane staining seen in >30% of the tumour cells. (b) HER2-neu expression(400x):1+: Faint membrane staining in >10% of the tumour cell. (c) HER2-neu expression(400x); 2+: Weak to moderate complete membrane staining in >10% of the tumour cells.

HER2-neu expression in cases.

S. No.HER2-neu expressionNo. of cases (41)Percentage (%)
1Negative0, +13380.5
2Equivocal+224.9
3Positive+3614.6
Total41

In cases with positive HER2-neu expression, mean group grade was calculated to be 4.83±0.40 and in patients with negative HER2-neu expression, mean prostatic volume was 3.38±1.40. There was a significant statistical difference (p=0.00003668) found between the Gleason Group Grade in HER2-neu positive and negative patients as HER2-neu positivity is seen in higher group grades [Table/Fig-16].

Comparison of mean of Gleason Group Grade with HER2-neu expression (mean of gleason group grades in HER2-neu positive and negative cases were calculated).

S. No.HER2-neu expressionMeanp-value
Gleason Group GradePositive4.83±0.400.00003668
Negative3.38±1.40

Discussion

According to recent studies, prostate cancer is responsible for nearly 6% of all male cancer death. Almost 95% of the patients are in an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Overexpression of HER2-neu oncogene has been widely studied and frequently detected in breast, ovarian, lung, bladder and gastric cancers. In prostate cancer, the role of HER2-neu overexpression remains uncertain since conflicting results emerge from various studies.

In the present study, a total of 41 histopathologically proven cases of prostatic carcinoma were evaluated. HER2-neu overexpression by the IHC method was observed in 6 (14.6%) cases. HER2-neu overexpression is higher than the study done by the United States National Cancer Institute conducted in 2002. They found overexpression of HER2-neu in 5 cases out of 62 i.e., 8.0% where 1 case was 3+ and 4 were 2+, which were later confirmed by FISH.

Gu K et al., reported HER2-neu positivity in 62% of cases [9]. HER2-neu overexpression was reported as 29% in Ross JS et al., [10]. These numbers are quite high when compared to the present study. Zahir ST et al., reported HER2-neu overexpression in 4 (10%) cases [11]; Musalam A et al., in 17 (37%) [12]. Overall, in agreement with these studies, Authors found overexpression of HER2-neu in prostate carcinoma in the present study, but the percentage of cases showing HER2-neu overexpression was less when compared to these studies which could be due to nonavailability of FISH and/or low sample size.

S. PSA and HER2-neu immunostaining, In the present study, only thirty of the forty-one cases had S. PSA levels measured before the biopsy/surgery and were evaluated with respect to HER2-neu immunostaining in those thirty cases. Out of 30, six cases were HER2-neu positive and rest 24 were negative. Correlation was found between S. PSA levels and HER2-neu expression (p-value=0.047; r = +0.179). In HER2-neu positive cases, mean S. PSA is quite higher (209.09±48.42) when compared to mean S. PSA in HER2-neu negative cases (141.32±118.73) [Table/Fig-17]. Similar relationship was found in the study conducted by Zahir ST et al., [11], (p= 0.019; r=0.449) [12]. The present study was not in concordance with the study done by Musalam A et al., and Minner S et al., [12,13]. Musalam A et al., [12] showed that there was no significant correlation between total S. PSA and HER2-neu overexpression in prostate carcinoma [Pearson (r)=-0.009, p-value=0.9461] [12]. Similarly, Minner S et al., did not find any correlation between HER2-neu expression and preoperative S. PSA [13].

Comparison of S. PSA Levels (ng/mL) with HER2-neu expression.

HER2-neu expressionMeanp-valuePearson coefficient (29)
S. PSA levels (ng/mL)Positive209.09±48.420.047+0.179
Negative141.32±118.73

Gleason Group Grade and HER2-neu expression [Table/Fig-18]. In the present study, Gleason grading was done in 40 cases, remaining one case was reported as small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. There was a significant correlation between Gleason group grading and HER2-neu overexpression (p-value=0.00003668, highly significant).

Correlation between Gleason grading and HER2-neu expression.

Correlation between Gleason grading and HER2-neu expression (p-value)
Present studyp=0.00003668
Minner S et al., [13]p<0.0001

Similar results were obtained by Minner S et al., as they found a significant correlation between Gleason grading and HER2-neu immunostaining (p<0.0001, each i.e., separately calculated in all groups) [13]. Not many comparative studies are available for group grading system as this system of scoring is recently introduced in 2016 [11].

In the present study, patient age, S. PSA and Gleason group grading shows a positive and significant relationship with HER2-neu expression whereas prostatic volume in cc does not show a significant relationship with HER2-neu expression. The exact role of HER2-neu expression in pathogenesis and treatment of prostate carcinoma is still unknown The question, whether patients of prostatic carcinoma could benefit from monoclonal antibodies therapy targeting HER2-neu receptor is still unresolved till date. Therapeutic effect of Herceptin has been observed in animal models which support the potential utility of such treatment [13].

In the present study, a higher significant relation between HER2-neu expression, and Gleason group grading of prostatic carcinoma, argue in favor of using HER2-neu as a drug target in high grades of prostatic carcinoma.

Limitation(s)

However, there were few limitations in this study. The sample size was low, thus choice for statistical tests was limited and two cases in this study showed equivocal expression on HER2-neu staining which needs to be confirmed by FISH technique, which was unavailable in our institute. Because of this, these two cases were neither classified as positive nor negative.

Conclusion(s)

Compared to low Gleason Group Grade carcinoma, higher percentage of HER2-neu expression is seen in high Gleason Group Grade carcinoma. Statistically significant difference is found between the S. PSA levels (ng/mL) and HER2-neu expression and also between the age group of the patients and HER2-neu expression. No significant statistical difference was found between the prostatic volume on ultrasonography and HER2-neu expression.

Moreover, the effect of trastuzumab was limited in a few clinical prostate cancer trials. It could be argued, nevertheless, that different dosages of trastuzumab or combination therapy would be required to be effective in prostate cancers showing overexpression. Independent of this, it might be interesting to include prostate cancer patients in clinical studies using new generations of more efficient anti-HER2 therapy such as the anti-HER2 recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody 2C4 or antisense approaches. So in future studies with larger sample size and availability of FISH, the role of this receptor in worsening prognosis of prostate cancer can be spoken with great certainty.

References

[1]Toivanen R, Shen MM, Prostate organogenesis: Tissue induction, hormonal regulation and cell type specification The Company of Biologists Ltd 2017 144:1382-98.10.1242/dev.14827028400434  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Hariharan K, Padmanabha V, Demography and disease characteristics of prostate cancer in India Indian Journal of Urology 2016 32(2):103-08.10.4103/0970-1591.17477427127351  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System Am J SurgPathol 2016 40(2):244-52.10.1097/PAS.000000000000053026492179  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Rosai J, Ackerman L, Rosai J, Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology 2011 Vol (2)Edition 10thEdinburghMosby  [Google Scholar]

[5]Sanchez KM, Sweeney CJ, Mass R, Koch MO, Eckert GJ, Geary WA, Evaluation of HER-2/neu Expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A request for a standardized, organ specific methodology Cancer 2002 95:1650-55.10.1002/cncr.1083912365012  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Kumar V, Robbins basic pathology 2013 9th edPhiladelphiaElseviersaunders  [Google Scholar]

[7]Kim D, Kim S, Moon H, Park S, Kim Y, Choi H, The role of TURP in the detection of prostate cancer in BPH patients with previously negative prostate biopsy Korean Journal of Urology 2010 51(5):31310.4111/kju.2010.51.5.31320495693  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Perera M, Lawrentschuk N, Perera N, Bolton D, Clouston D, Incidental prostate cancer in transurethral resection of prostate specimens in men aged up to 65 years Prostate Int 2020 4:11-14.10.1016/j.prnil.2015.10.01627014658  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Gu K, Mes-Masson AM, Gauthier J, Saad F, Overexpression of her-2/neu in human prostate cancer and benign hyperplasia Cancer Letters 1996 99:185-89.10.1016/0304-3835(95)04061-7  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[10]Ross JS, Sheehan CE, Hayner-Buchan AM, Ambros RA, Kallakury BVS, Kaufman RP, Prognostic significance of HER-2/neu gene amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization of prostate carcinoma American Cancer Society 1997 79:2162-70.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970601)79:11<2162::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-U  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Zahir ST, Tafti HF, Rahmani K, Overexpression of her-2/neu in patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014 15(15):6425-28.10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.15.642525124637  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Musalam A, Andarawi M, Osman M, Al-Shriam M, Elrefaie A, Mahfouz AA, Alterations of COX-2, HER-2/neu and E-Cadherin protein expression in the prostatic adenocarcinoma: Preliminary findings Am J Transl Res 2019 11(3):1653-67.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Minner S, Jessen B, Stiedenroth L, Burandt E, Köllermann J, Mirlacher M, Low Level Her2 Overexpression is associated with rapid tumour cell proliferation and poor prognosis in prostate cancer Clin Cancer Res 2010 16(5):1553-60.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-254620179235  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]