JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Ophthalmology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45649.14287
Year : 2020 | Month : Nov | Volume : 14 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : NC10 - NC13

Surgical Outcome of Levator Resection in Congenital Ptosis with Poor Levator Function at a Tertiary Care Centre

Sonali Vinay Kumar1, Sanjay Dhar2, HS Trehan3

1 Associate Professor, Department of Eye, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.
2 Classified Specialist, Department of Ophthalmology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.
3 Consultant and Head, Department of Ophthalmology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Sonali Vinay Kumar, Associate Professor, Department of Eye, Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi-110010, India.
E-mail: sonaliv91775@hotmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Treatment of congenital ptosis is challenging as results are unpredictable. The ideal surgical technique which gives optimal cosmetic outcome without complications is still evolving. Tarso-frontalis sling operation is the preferred standard of care when levator action is poor but it has high rate of complications. Hence, supramaximal levator redivtion has been advocated over the past two decades as an alternative treatment modality.

Aim

To assess the effectiveness of supramaximal levator redivtion in patients with unilateral simple congenital ptosis, having poor levator action (≤4 mm).

Materials and Methods

A longitudinal interventional study was conducted over a period of six months. Fifteen patients, during the study period, underwent supramaximal levator redivtion under General Anesthesia (GA) after taking informed consent from next of kin. All patients were evaluated on day one, one week, one, three and six months after surgery. Surgical outcome measures were change in margin reflex distance-1, vertical palpebral fissure height and inter-eyelid difference of margin reflex distance. Success was defined as margin reflex distance-1 (MRD-1) ≥3 mm and inter-eyelid difference of MRD-1 between 0.5 and 1 mm.

Results

There were 10 females (60%) and 5 males (40%) in the study group. The mean age group at the time of ptosis surgery was 5.73±0.55 years (range from 03 and 11 years). A good surgical outcome was obtained in 12 (80%) patients. In 02 (13.3%) patients under-correction was noted which did not need further intervention as visual axis was clear. Upper lid swelling occurred in one patient (6.6%) which was treated with anti-inflammatory medications.

Conclusion

Supramaximal levator redivtion may be considered in all cases of unilateral ptosis patients with poor levator action as this procedure yields good surgical outcomes.

Keywords

Introduction

Blepharoptosis means drooping of the upper eyelid and when it is present since birth it is known as congenital ptosis. There is abnormal growth and fatty infiltration of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle which causes fibrosis of the muscle in congenital ptosis [1]. Congenital ptosis not only causes cosmetic problem but also results in visual disturbance which results in amblyopia. Amblyopia occurs if the visual axis is obscured by the droopy eyelid or due to associated corneal astigmatism. In ptosis, intervention is required if it obscures the visual axis causing amblyopia, if child develops abnormal head tilt and sometimes for improving the cosmetic appearance of the child [2]. The unpredictable nature of various surgical techniques performed for treating congenital ptosis with poor levator action is still one of the most difficult tasks for oculoplastic surgeon as surgical procedure is often associated with complication like under-correction, lid asymmetry and poor cosmetic results [2,3].

Frontalis sling surgery has been recommended in the treatment of unilateral ptosis in the past decades. In sling surgery the frontalis muscle is connected with upper tarsal plate which results in better eyelid position in primary gaze and causes elevation of the eyelid whenever frontalis muscle is in action [4]. However, it is associated with complication like sling expulsion, exposure, infection, brow scar, suture granuloma and cosmetic disfigurement [5]. Levator resection yields good cosmesis in terms of acceptable lid contour and symmetry but always result in under-correction. The difficulty in managing unilateral congenital ptosis with poor levator action still persists and the ideal surgical procedure is still evolving [6].

The result in various published data about different surgical procedures for treating congenital ptosis varies. The tarso-frontalis sling surgery is easy to perform but has a high recurrence rate [7-10]. The need of one more procedure to address these issues results in dissatisfaction among patients. This study was executed at the study centre to analyse the postoperative surgical outcomes after supramaximal levator resection in congenital ptosis with poor levator resection and it was a first of its kind in Armed Forces population.

Materials and Methods

A longitudinal study was conducted over a period of six months from July 2019 to December 2019, in the eye department of a Tertiary Care Centre. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 15 patients diagnosed with unilateral simple congenital ptosis with poor levator action were included in this study after obtaining informed consent from patients’s next of kin.

Exclusion criteria: Patient with Marcus Gunn jaw-winking phenomenon were excluded from this study.

All patients (n=15) of unilateral congenital ptosis underwent supramaximal levator resection during the study period and all were followed-up for another six months. In all cases detailed history was taken and patients underwent comprehensive eye check-up. Ocular examination included vision, refraction, external and fundus examination. Ptosis examination included measuring vertical palpebral fissure height, margin reflex distance, upper lid crease position, levator muscle action, Bell’s phenomenon and the presence of Marcus Gunn jaw-winking phenomenon [Table/Fig-1]. Margin reflex distance-1 was defined as the distance between the corneal light reflection and the upper eyelid margin (normal value is 4-4.5 mm). The vertical palpebral fissure is the distance between the upper and lower lid margin while the patient is in primary gaze (normal range vary from 8-12 mm). Levator muscle action was defined as excursion of the upper lid from extreme downgaze to extreme upgaze was recorded. Levator function was divided into three groups depending on the amount of lid movement: good (action >8 mm), fair (5-7 mm), and poor (0-4 mm) [11].

Clinical photograph showing unilateral congenital ptosis (black arrow).

Surgical outcome measures were change in margin reflex distance-1, vertical palpebral fissure height and inter-eyelid difference of margin reflex distance-1 with clear visual axis with the eyes in the primary position and resolution of any head tilt. A good surgical outcome was defined as MRD-1 3-4 mm and inter-eyelid difference of MRD-1 between 0.5 to 1 mm in unilateral cases at the last follow-up visit.

Surgical technique: The surgical technique, which was performed by the same surgeon, involved first making a skin incision to match the contralateral lid crease, if present or 10 mm away from the lid margin. Incision was made with radiofrequency cautery and dissection was done in suborbicularis plane to expose the upper third of the tarsal plate. The undersurface of the levator muscle was dissected from the underlying Muller’s muscle and the conjunctiva. The septum was incised to expose the levator, till Whitnall’s ligament, after retracting the preaponeurotic fat. A 6-0 prolene suture was passed through partial thickness of the tarsus at junction of upper two third and lower one third, then it was placed posterior to the levator muscle and then retrieved through the levator muscle inferior to Whitnall’s ligament [Table/Fig-2]. Two more sutures were passed between the levator muscle near to Whitnall’s ligament and the tarsus on medial and lateral side. Three sutures were adjusted as needed and levator was excised. Lid crease was formed by taking the bite through subepidermal area, stump of levator and preseptal orbicularis layer with 6-0 vicryl. Finally, skin was closed with 6-0 vicryl and frost suture was applied to avoid exposure keratopathy in the postoperative period. The eyelid position was adjusted intraoperatively using Berke’s rule as guide to the expected postoperative descent of the eyelid and hence, the upper eyelid was placed at superior limbus as the levator muscle action was poor in all cases [11,12]. Postoperative antibiotic eye drops for one week and lubricants for six weeks were prescribed. The last visit follow-up data with all the measurements were compared with the preoperative data.

Intraoperative photograph showing dissected levator muscle upto Whitnall’s ligament with placement of suture below Whitnall’s ligament (blue arrow) and through tarsal plate (black arrow).

Postoperative evaluation was done on first day, after one week, one, three and six month. The main surgical parameter/outcomes which assessed during each follow-up visit were MRD-1, vertical palpebral fissure height, inter-eyelid difference of MRD-1, eyelid contour and its comparison with normal eyelid and condition of visual axis of the operated eyelid. Clinical photograph was taken in each visit.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was entered in Microsoft Excel 2007 and analysed using Epi info version 3.4.3. Mean, standard deviation and percentages were calculated for preoperative and postoperative examination findings. Paired t-test was applied to determine any statistical difference. A p-value of <0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Ninety-five percent confidence interval for the difference of proportion was also calculated.

Results

A total of 15 patients with congenital ptosis with poor levator action underwent supramaximal levator resection. There were 10 females (60%) and 5 males (40%) in the study group. The mean age group at the time of ptosis surgery was 5.73±0.55 years (range from 03 and 11 years). The preoperative [Table/Fig-3] and postoperative evaluation [Table/Fig-4] included recording of vertical fissure height, margin reflex distance and inter-eyelid difference of margin reflex distance which were correlated [Table/Fig-5].

Preoperative examination findings of the patients.

PatientAgeGenderMRD-1 (mm)VPFH (mm)Inter-eyelid MRD-1 (mm) differenceLAUpper LC
13Female163Not recordedAbsent
24Female1633Absent
33Female0543Absent
43Female1632Absent
56Female-1454Faint
68Female-1634Faint
711Female0543Absent
83Female163Not recordedAbsent
95Male1633Absent
106Male0544Faint
118Male-1452Absent
1210Male0544Faint
135Female0544Faint
148Female-1452Absent
153Male163Not recordedAbsent

MRD: Margin reflex distance; VPFH: Vertical palpebral fissure height; LA: Levator action; LC: Lid crease


Postoperative findings of all operated patients.

PatientMRD-1 (mm)VPFH (mm)Inter-eyelid MRD-1 (mm) difference
1490
23.590.5
33.590.5
4381
5272
63.58.50.5
7490
8381
93.590.5
10272
113.590.5
12381
13490
143.58.50.5
15381

MRD: Margin reflex distance; VPFH: Vertical palpebral fissure height


Comparison between preoperative and postoperative surgical outcome parameters.

ParameterPreoperative meanPostoperative meanp-value95% CI
MRD-10.26±0.77 mm3.26±0.6 mm<0.00012.48 to 3.51
VPFH5.26±0.77 mm8.4±0.68 mm<0.00012.59 to 3.68
Inter eyelid MRD-1 difference3.73±0.62 mm0.73±0.62mm<0.00012.53 to 3.46

Values are represented as Mean±SD. All measurements are in millimetres. p-value of less than 0.05 is considered as significant. Favourable outcome is defined as MRD-1, within 1 mm of the contralateral eye. MRD1, margin reflex distance; PFH, palpebral fissure height


The mean preoperative levator action was 3.16±0.79 mm. Vertical palpebral fissure height increased from mean of 5.26±0.77 mm to a mean of 8.4±0.68 mm (p<0.0001; 95% CI, 2.59 to 3.68) postoperatively after one week which remained same at the last visit (after six months of surgery) . Margin reflex distance-1 increased from a mean of 0.26±0.77 mm to 3.26±0.6 mm (p<0.0001; 95% CI, 2.48 to 3.51) postoperatively after one week which remained same after 06 months and the range was 2. Inter-eyelid difference of margin reflex distance-1 decreased from mean of 3.73±0.62 to 0.73±0.62 mm (p<0.0001; CI, 2.53 to 3.46) postoperatively after one week which remained same after six months. The mean MRD in normal eye was 4 mm. A visible improvement was noted in the lid height and contour with clear visual axis in all patients [Table/Fig-6].

One week postoperative clinical photograph showing improvement following ptosis correction with levator resection (black arrow).

Complications which were encountered were under-correction as MRD-1 was 2 mm in two patients (13.3%) and upper lid swelling in one patient (6.6%), which persisted even after one week of surgery. As visual axis was clear in two cases after one month in whom under-correction (MRD-1 remained 2 mm) was found, observation was advised and three monthly follow-up. Upper lid swelling subsided after a seven days course of Antinflammatory medications.

Discussion

Supramaximal levator resection for severe unilateral ptosis was first introduced in 1984 [13]. Levator resection results in better cosmesis such as the presence of dynamic blink, preservation of natural eyelid contour and a lack of dependency on the frontalis muscle action for opening eyes compared to frontalis suspension surgery. In this study, all patients with poor levator action subjected to supramaximal levator resection instead of tarsofrontalis sling operation. The supramaximal levator resection attained good surgical outcomes for congenital ptosis with poor levator action in 80% of cases as postoperative MRD-1 was found to be 3 mm. These patients had an excellent reduction in ptosis with a free visual axis, reducing the risk of amblyopia. These study findings are in concordance with Cruz AA et al., and Mete A et al., that achieved success rate of 91.4% and 70% in their study, respectively [3,14]. In the study by Chen W et al., which reported excellent results in 8 out of 10 (80%) patients in unilateral congenital ptosis and in 14 of 15 patients (93.3%) in bilateral condition with levator action of 4 mm or less, who underwent maximal levator resection [15]. Supramaximal levator resection was also reported to be effective for correction of congenital ptosis associated with blepharophimosis syndrome in a study by Decock CE et al., [16].

However, Pak J et al., showed good outcome only in 2 of 7 cases (28.6%) and Park DH et al., reported satisfactory outcome in 35 of 65 cases (53.9) [17,18]. Anderson RL et al., also reported success rate of 71% over a one year follow-up in patients, who were treated with supramaximal levator muscle resection [19].

In some patient’s, undercorrection was noticed; however visual axis was clear so observation was advised in these two cases. Postoperatively patient had lagophthalmos and lid lag on downgaze which became less visible after three months. It happened because pretarsal orbicularis muscle regained its strength within few months postoperatively.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of this study is that the surgical outcomes of supramaximal levator resection were not compared with tarsofrontalis sling operation. The other limitation of this study includes its small sample size and short follow-up. A larger study group would be helpful to validate the surgical effectiveness of maximal levator resection.

Conclusion(s)

Levator resection is an effective alternative for tarsofrontalis sling operation as it leads to good surgical outcomes in patients diagnosed with congenital ptosis. It allows normal physiological use of levator action, despite its poor function in congenital ptosis which yields good result by avoiding all complications which are associated with tarsofrontalis sling operation.

MRD: Margin reflex distance; VPFH: Vertical palpebral fissure height; LA: Levator action; LC: Lid creaseMRD: Margin reflex distance; VPFH: Vertical palpebral fissure heightValues are represented as Mean±SD. All measurements are in millimetres. p-value of less than 0.05 is considered as significant. Favourable outcome is defined as MRD-1, within 1 mm of the contralateral eye. MRD1, margin reflex distance; PFH, palpebral fissure height

References

[1]Lee JH, Aryasit O, Kim YD, Woo K, Lee L, Johnson O, Maximum levator resection in unilateral congenital ptosis Br J Ophthalmol 2017 101:740-46.10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-30916327601423  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Lee JH, Kim YD, Surgical treatment of unilateral severe simple congenital ptosis Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2018 8(1):03-08.10.4103/tjo.tjo_70_1729675342  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Cruz AA, Akaishi PM, Mendonca AK, Bernadini F, Devoto M, Garcia DM, Supramaximal levator resection for severe unilateral congenital blepharoptosis Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2014 30:366-71.10.1097/IOP.000000000000010524759292  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Al Mujaini A, Wali A, Total levator resection Oman Journal of Ophthalmology 2010 3:122-25.10.4103/0974-620X.7188621120047  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Ho YF, Wu SY, Tsai YJ, Factors associated with surgical outcomes in congenital ptosis. A 10 year study of 319 cases Americal Journal of Ophthalmology 2017 175:173-82.10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.01328040525  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Skaat A, Fabian I, Spierer A, Rosen N, Rosner M, Simon B, Congenital Ptosis repair- surgical, cosmetic and functional outcome: A report of 162 cases Can J Ophthalmol 2013 48:93-96.10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.09.01023561601  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Ben GJ, Macedo AA, Schwarcz RM, Debbie Y, McCann J, Goldberg RS, Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: Evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material Am J Ophthalmol 2005 140:877-85.10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.03116214102  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Kersten RC, Bernaridi FP, Khouri L, Moin M, Roumeliotis A, Kulwin DR, Unilateral frontalis sling for the surgical correction of unilateral poor function test ptosis Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005 140:877-85.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Bernaridini FP, Devoto MH, Priolo E, Treatment of unilateral congenital ptosis Ophthalmology 2007 114:622-23.10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.01717324711  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Yoon JS, Lee SY, Long term functional and cosmetic outcomes after frontalis suspension using autogenous fascia lata for pediatric congenital ptosis Ophthalmology 2009 116:1405-14.10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.04019481809  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Berke RN, Results of resection of the levator muscle through a skin incision in congenital ptosis AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1959 61:177-201.10.1001/archopht.1959.0094009017900113616781  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Cates CA, Tyres AG, Outcomes of anterior levator resection in congenital blepharpharotosis Eye(Lond) 2001 15:770-73.10.1038/eye.2001.24711827000  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Epstein GA, Putterman AM, Super maximum levator resection for severe congenital blepharoptosis Ophthalmic Surg 1984 15:971-79.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Mete A, Cagatay HH, Pamukcu C, Kimyon S, Saygili O, Gungor K, Maximal levator muscle resection for primary congenital blepharoptosis with poor levator function Semin Ophthalmol 2017 32:270-75.10.3109/08820538.2015.106833926337191  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Chen W, Liu Z, Tian Q, Niu H, Liu F, Wang X, Levator resection with suspensory ligament of the superior fornix suspension for correction of pediatric congenital ptosis with poor levator function Eye (Lond) 2016 30:1490-95.10.1038/eye.2016.16527518546  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Decock CE, Shah AD, Delaey C, Forsyth R, Bauters W, Kestelyn P, Increased levator muscle function by supramaximal resection in patients with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome Arch Ophthalmol 2011 129:1018-22.10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.21821825186  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Pak J, Shields M, Putterman AM, Superior tarsectomy augments super maximum levator resection in correction of severe blepharoptosis with poor levator function Ophthalmology 2006 113:1201-08.10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.03216815403  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Park DH, Choi WS, Yoon SH, Shim JS, Comparison of levator resection and frontalis muscle transfer in the treatment of severe blepharoptosis Ann Plast Surg 2007 59:388-92.10.1097/01.sap.0000258456.24810.c817901729  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Anderson RL, Jordan DR, Dutton JJ, Whitnall’s sling for poor function ptosis Arch Ophthalmol 1990 108:1628-32.10.1001/archopht.1990.010701301300432244848  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]