JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/46021.14281
Year : 2020 | Month : Nov | Volume : 14 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : EC37 - EC41

Prospective Study on Histopathological Spectrum of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions in a Teaching Hospital of Southern India

Eslavath Aruna1, V Kalyan Chakravarthy2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2 Professor, Department of Pathology, Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Eslavath Aruna, H. No. 17-1-391/T/242, Lane Beside Saraswathi Sishu Mandhir, Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad-500059, Hyderabad, India.
E-mail: drsujathapasula@gmail.com; draruna@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The Upper Gastrointestinal Tract (UGIT) disorders are quite common in routine clinical practice and have high degree of morbidity and mortality. They can be studied by collecting tissue sample by way of fiberoptic endoscope and by subjecting the tissue to histopathological examination.

Aim

To study the spectrum of histopathological lesions of UGIT lesions by endoscopy.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study done in the Department of Pathology at PSIMS, Chinna Avutapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India, over a period of one year from March 2019 to February 2020 on 160 endoscopic biopsies. All UGIT endoscopic biopsies received were examined histopathologically. The data was entered into excel sheets and percentages and ratios were calculated.

Results

Lesions of UGIT were more common in the age groups of 31 to 50 years and the male to female ratio was 1.9:1. The patient age ranged from 20 years to 78 years. Stomach was the common site for UGIT endoscopic biopsies i.e., 80 (50%) followed by oesophagus 50 (31.2%) and then duodenum 30 (18.7%). At all three sites, non-neoplastic lesions predominated over neoplastic lesions. The gastric malignancies were more common in antral and pyloric regions.

Conclusion

Males in the fourth and fifth decades are more prone for UGIT lesions with predominance of chronic non-specific inflammatory conditions as compared to neoplastic conditions. Malignancy within the stomach, more commonly affects the antrum and pylorus. Malignant lesions are very rare in duodenum.

Keywords

Introduction

The UGIT disorders are quite common in routine clinical practice and have high degree of morbidity and mortality [1]. The UGIT comprises of oral cavity, oesophagus, stomach and duodenum. Several lesions can affect the UGIT which are broadly classified into congenital anomalies, infections, inflammation, benign and malignant neoplasms [2]. To visualise and to get the specimen from the gastrointestinal tract a flexible, fiberoptic endoscopy is used. Endoscopic biopsy in combination with histopathological examination plays an important role in the early diagnosis of oesophago-gastro-duodenal lesions [3]. The flexible fiberoptic endoscope for upper GIT was introduced almost 50 years ago and was used for the first time in 1968. It facilitated the diagnosis of lesions in the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum [1]. Endoscopy provides the ease of direct visualisation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. By endoscopy a tissue sample from the lesion can be collected and studied by histopathology. This procedure has been well established over the years and is the gold standard to diagnose the nature of UGIT lesions [4]. Endoscopic biopsies are performed to diagnose a disease, to monitor the disease process, to assess the response to treatment and also to diagnose any complications at an earlier stage [5].

As there was no published literature from this area of Southern India, the present study reports the nature of UGIT lesions based on histopathology in our local rural population. The objectives were to look at the age and gender distribution, the sites and the types of lesions affecting the UGIT.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Pathology at Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Chinna Avutapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study period was of one year from March 2019 to February 2020. The study had no ethical issues.

Inclusion Criteria

Age range from 20 years to 78 years,

Both genders,

All the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies, which included the lesions from oesophagus, stomach and upto second part of duodenum.

Exclusion Criteria

Age less than 20 years,

Lesions in the oral cavity and pharynx,

Lesions beyond the second part of duodenum.

Sample Collection

A total of 160 biopsy samples from the UGIT were collected by endoscopy and were received from Department of General Surgery. The biopsies were received in formalin containers along with the histopathology test requisitions. Demographic data such as age, gender, duration of symptoms of the patients were noted from the histopathology requisition forms. Other routine investigation results and radiological examination like x-ray and ultrasound reports wherever available were also recorded. All the upper GI endoscopic biopsies were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for adequate time and were processed in automated tissue processor and embedded in paraffin with mucosal surfaces facing uppermost. Sections were cut at five micron thickness and were stained by Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Special stains such as Giemsa, Warthin-Starry stains were also done whenever indicated. Immunohistochemistry studies were not done. The stained slides were examined and histomorphological patterns were studied. Tumours were diagnosed according to the recent WHO classification (2019) [6].

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, the data was entered into excel sheets and percentages and ratios were calculated.

Results

A total of 160 biopsy samples were studied from Upper GIT i.e., from oesophagus, stomach and duodenum.

Distribution of cases based on the site: There were 50 (31.2%) cases from oesophageal lesions, 80 (50%) cases from stomach and 30 (18.7%) cases with duodenal lesions. Majority of UGIT endoscopic biopsies were obtained from stomach [Table/Fig-1].

Age, gender and site-wise distribution of biopsies. M: Male; F: Female.

Oesophagus (50)Stomach (80)Duodenum (30)Total
Age (years)MFTotalMFTotalMFTotalMFTotal
20-3001010207061303020511920
31-40230528241236040307512071
41-50040610101121110415252146
51-600201030301040201037310
61-7004010505-05---9110
71-8001010201-01---213
Total35 (70%)15 (30%)50 (100%)50 (62.5%)30 (37.5%)80 (100%)20 (66.6%)10 (33.3%)30 (100%)105 (65.6%)55 (34.3)160 (100%)

Non-neoplastic versus neoplastic lesions based on site: In the present study among oesophageal biopsies, 30 (60%) were non-neoplastic and 20 (40%) were neoplastic [Table/Fig-2]. There were also a few premalignant/dysplastic lesions in the oesophageal biopsies showing disordered arrangement of the epithelium and nuclear hyperchromasia with intact basement membrane [Table/Fig-3]. There were 4 (8%) cases of frank squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus with cellular features of malignancy and infiltration into the underlying stroma [Table/Fig-4]. Among gastric biopsies, 70 (87.5%) were non-neoplastic and 10 (12.5%) were neoplastic. Chronic non-specific gastritis was the most common finding in the non-neoplastic group and was seen in 38 (47.5%) cases [Table/Fig-5]. Among duodenal biopsies all 30 (100%) were non-neoplastic. Males were predominant i.e., 65.6% as compared to females i.e., 34.3% and the male to female ratio was 1.9:1 [Table/Fig-1].

Pattern of histopathological lesions and site of endoscopic biopsies in oesophagus.

OesophagusSiteNo. of cases
Non-neoplastic-(30/50)
Normal studyUpper 2/3rd06 (12%)
Chronic non-specific oesophagitisUpper 1/3rd20 (40%)
Oesophageal ulcerUpper 1/3rd04 (8%)
Neoplastic- (20/50)
Benign-06
Squamous papillomaUpper 1/3rd06 (12%)
Malignant and premalignant-14
Low grade dysplasiaMiddle 2/3rd05 (10%)
High grade dysplasiaLower 1/3rd04 (8%)
Well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomaLower 2/3rd04 (8%)
Adenocarcinoma of oesophagusLower 1/3rd01 (2%)
Total50 (100%)

Non-neoplastic lesions were more common than neoplastic lesions in oesophagus


Oesophageal dysplasia showing dysplastic squamous cells (H&E100X).

Squamous cell carcinoma of oesophagus showing infiltrating squamous cells (H&E 40X).

Pattern of histopathological lesions and site of endoscopic biopsies in stomach.

StomachSiteNo. of cases
Non-neoplastic (70)
Acute gastric ulcerPylorus07 (8.7%)
Chronic peptic ulcerPylorus15 (18.7%)
Chronic non-specific antral gastritisAntrum38 (47.5%)
Chronic atrophic gastritisPylorus02 (2.5%)
Hyperplastic polypPylorus08 (10%)
Neoplastic (10)
Gastric adenocarcinomaPylorus04 (5%)
Signet ring cell adenocarcinomaAntrum06 (7.5%)
Total80 (100%)

Non-neoplastic lesions were more common than neoplastic lesions in stomach


The oesophageal and gastric biopsies were most frequently received from the patients in 3rd decade and biopsies from both locations were common in males as compared to females. Duodenal biopsies were most frequently received from the patients in 4th decade and here also males were predominant as compared to females. Among non-neoplastic lesions chronic non-specific antral gastritis was the most common of all. Among malignancy all 10 cases were seen in antrum and pylorus region of stomach. All the patients with malignant lesions had presented with the complaints of pain in abdomen and loss of appetite.

Pattern of histopathological lesions and site of endoscopic biopsies in duodenum: There were 20 (66.6%) cases of chronic non-specific duodenitis and 10 (33.3%) cases of duodenal ulcer. All the 30 cases had sampling from the first part of duodenum. There were no cases of duodenal neoplasia.

Discussion

Lesions of UGIT are commonly encountered in clinical practice and if they are severe, recurrent or chronic then often they are subjected to endoscopy followed by biopsy. The most common indications for UGIT endoscopy are dyspepsia, dysphagia and odynophagia, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), nausea and vomiting that is persistent, occult gastrointestinal bleeding, and surveillance for malignancy. Upper GI endoscopy is very useful for removal of foreign body and is also indicated for stricture dilatation [7]. In the present study, an attempt was done to evaluate the type of lesions of UGIT in our local population. In the present study, a total of 160 endoscopic biopsies from UGIT were examined histopathologically. Krishnappa R et al., studied 100 cases of upper GI endoscopic biopsies [8]. In their study the male to female ratio was 2.03:1 and more number of cases was seen in the fourth and fifth decades.

In the Bhat N et al., study, 200 cases were studied with a wide range of patient age from 16 years to 95 years and the mean age was 56.63 years [9]. In a similar study by Rani D et al., histopathological examination was done in 100 endoscopic biopsies from the UGIT lesions [10]. In a study by Bhargavi M et al., study a total of 106 cases were studied [11]. In a study by Theresa JM et al., 152 cases of upper gastrointestinal lesions were studied [12]. In the present study, maximum number of cases was among 31-40 years and 41-50 years. The youngest patient in present study was 20-year-old, while the oldest was 78 years [Table/Fig-1]. Rani D et al., in their study observed the youngest patient to be 21-year-old, while the oldest one was of 80 years [10]. Maximum number of cases was in 5th to 7th decades of life in their study. In the Duraisamy PR et al., study, the age range was from 23 years to 90 years with a mean of 57 years [13]. In the Theresa JM et al., study, the commonly affected age group was 31-40 years followed by 41 to 50 years [12]. The youngest age included in the study was 16 years and the eldest age was 72 years.

In present study, there was a slight male preponderance and the male to female ratio was 1.9:1 [Table/Fig-1]. In the Rani D et al., study, there were 61 males and 39 females and the male to female ratio was 1.5:1 [10]. In the Duraisamy PR et al., study, there were 132 males and 64 female patients and the male to female ratio was 2:1 [13]. In the Bhat N et al., and Theresa JM et al., studies, there were 120 (63.54%) males and 80 (36.46%) females, the male:female ratio being 1.5:1 and 87 males and 65 females with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1, respectively [9,12].

In present study, out of 100 cases, 31.2% (50/160) of the biopsies were from the oesophagus, 50% (80/160) were from the stomach and 18.7% (30/160) were from the duodenum [Table/Fig-1]. Bhat N et al., reported the site-wise distribution of endoscopic biopsies as gastric 110 (55%), oesophagus 48 (24%), gastro-oesophageal junction as 22 (11%) and duodenum 20 (10%) [9]. Rani D et al., in their study reported 30% of the biopsies from oesophagus, 46% from stomach and 24% were from duodenum [10]. Bhargavi M et al., observed 60% biopsies from stomach followed by oesophagus (23%) and duodenum (17%) [11]. Theresa JM et al., reported 74% biopsies was from stomach, 15% from oesophagus, and the remaining 1% biopsies from duodenum [12]. Present study observations for the site wise distribution of lesions in UGIT compare well with the observations of above authors. In present study, the non-neoplastic pathologies predominated over neoplastic pathologies in all upper GI sites. Most of the studies have observed predominance of non-neoplastic lesions in upper GIT [Table/Fig-6] [8-12]. Bhargavi M et al., reported squamous cell carcinoma as the most common malignancy in the middle third of the oesophagus [11]. The incidence of oesophageal carcinoma was higher in the study by Bhat N et al., [Table/Fig-7] [9]. It could be due to the geographical region, environmental factors or due to the practice of consuming salted tea with sodium bicarbonate that is common in this region.

Comparative studies of endoscopic lesions [8-12].

Comparative studiesOesophagusStomachDuodenum
Non-neoplasticNeoplasticNon-neoplasticNeoplasticNon-neoplasticNeoplastic
Krishnappa R et al., (2013) [8]14 (56%)11 (44%)41 (60%)27 (40%)5 (71%)2 (28.5%)
Bhat N et al., (2018) [9]36 (75%)12 (25%)76 (69.09%)34 (30.90%)14 (70%)06 (30%)
Rani D et al., (2019) [10]02 (6.7%)28 (93.3%)32 (69.6%)14 (30.4%)20 (83.3%)04 (16.7%)
Bhargavi M et al., (2019) [11]07 (29.2%)17 (70.8%)28 (43.7%)36 (56.3%)16 (88.9%)02 (11.1%)
Theresa JM et al., (2020) [12]16 (72.7%)06 (27.2%)104 (92%)9 (7.96%)17 (100%)Nil
Present study (2020)30 (60%)20 (40%)70 (87.5%)10 (12.5%)30 (100%)Nil

Comparative studies of endoscopic oesophageal biopsies [9,10].

Oesophageal biopsiesBhat N et al., (2018) [9]Rani D et al., (2019) [10]Present study (2020)
Reflux oesophagitis-02 (6.7%)-
Chronic non-specific oesophagitis3 (6.25%)-20 (40%)
Oesophageal dysplasia2 (4.16%)-09 (18%)
Hyperplastic polyp2 (4.16%)--
Squamous papilloma1 (2.08%)3.3%06 (12%)
Well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma7 (20%)06 (20%)04 (8%)
Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma23 (65.71%)12 (40%)-
Poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma05 (14.28%)06 (13.3%)-
Adenocarcinoma-05 (16.7%)-
Non-specific pathology03--

In the study, by Theresa JM et al., common non-neoplastic lesion among the oesophageal biopsies were chronic non-specific oesophagitis [12], followed by oesophageal ulcer. The common neoplastic lesion observed was squamous cell carcinoma and there were three cases of Barret’s oesophagus. Barrett’s oesophagus is worrisome because it predisposes to adenocarcinoma of oesophagus and has 20 times increased risk [14]. One of the advantages of endoscopic biopsy is that it can pick up premalignant lesions. In present study, 9 (18%) cases of oesophageal dysplasia were detected [Table/Fig-2]. This helps the clinician for further patient management and surveillance. Multiple biopsies (≥8) from the base and edges of gastric ulcers are recommended if there is suspicion of malignancy or if the endoscopy is suggestive of malignancy [15]. Exfoliative cytology can also be performed and is complementary to biopsy [16]. Diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma is not so common but even when it is present, the mucosa may appear unremarkable. In such cases, there is low distensibility and with appropriate clinical context it should prompt multiple biopsies [15]. Chronic non-specific gastritis is a most common pathology in the stomach. In the present study, there were 47.5% cases of chronic non-specific gastritis [Table/Fig-5]. Bhat N et al., and Bhargavi M et al., observed similar incidence of 43.6% and 42.9% cases in their studies, respectively [Table/Fig-8] [9,11].

Comparative studies of endoscopic gastric biopsies [9-11].

Endoscopic gastric biopsiesBhat N et al., (2018) [9]Rani Det al., (2019) [10]Bhargavi M et al., (2019) [11]Present study (2020)
Gastric ulcer-04 (8.8%)-22 (27.5%)
Hyperplastic polyp14 (12.72%)04 (8.8%)-08 (10%)
H. pylori gastritis26 (54.16%)19.5%42.9%-
Chronic non-specific gastritis48 (43.63%)15%38 (47.5%)
Chronic atrophic gastritis---02 (2.5%)
Fundic gland polyp17.5%-
Adenocarcinoma/Signet ring cell carcinoma28 (25.45%)15%34 (94.4%)10 (12.5%)
Tubular adenocarcinoma-11%--
Papillary adenocarcinoma-01 (2.2%)--
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)-01 (2.2%)--
Others1 (0.90%)---

Suspected celiac disease is a very common indication for duodenal biopsy. As the histological changes may be patchy in distribution, four to six biopsies of the duodenal bulb and distal duodenum are recommended. Whenever celiac disease is not suspected but still if any minor abnormalities of the duodenal mucosa are seen, then biopsies are not indicated [16]. In our study, the most common histopathological diagnosis for duodenal biopsies was non-specific duodenitis. Bhat N et al., reported lower incidence (30%) in their study material [9]. No duodenal malignancies was observed in present study. Similar findings were reported by above authors [Table/Fig-9]. The lower GIT has more of non-neoplastic lesions as compared to neoplastic lesions with non-specific colitis being the most common lesion [17]. A similar trend is seen in the upper GI tract also with predominance of non-specific inflammation. Sometimes limitations of histopathological examination are seen like very tiny tissue samples, fragmented biopsy material, pinching artefacts and processing artefacts. Multiple tissue bits and adequate biopsy material taken from representative areas can overcome these limitations.

Comparative studies of endoscopic duodenal biopsies [8-12].

Duodenal biopsiesKrishnappa R et al., (2013) [8]Bhat N et al., (2018) [9]Rani D et al., (2019) [10]Bhargai M et al., (2019) [11]Theresa JM et al., (2020) [12]Present study (2020)
Celiac disease-3 (15%)14 (58.5%)---
Non-specific duodenitis4 (57%)6 (30%)03 (12.5%)161720 (66.6%)
Duodenal ulcer1 (14%)2 (10%)---10 (33.3%)
Adenocarcinoma1 (14%)2 (10%)03 (12.5%)01--
Tubular adenoma1 (14%)3 (15%)---
Normal histology-3 (15%)02 (8.3%)01--
Giardiasis-01 (4.1%)---
Lowgrade neuroendocrine tumour G1 (carcinoid)-1 (5%)01 (4.1%)01--

Limitation(s)

This was only an observational study with limited sample size. Some of the patients had undergone previous biopsy (at outside hospitals) but the reports were not available to compare evolution of the lesions. Also, immunohistochemistry and molecular studies could not be done. Larger and further studies are needed to evaluate the predisposing risk factors for upper GIT lesions.

Conclusion(s)

UGIT lesions are more common in adults in the fourth and fifth decades and are more common in males as compared to females. Non-neoplastic conditions predominate over neoplastic conditions. The antrum and pylorus are favoured sites for gastric malignancy. Malignant lesions are very rare in duodenum. Further large scale studies are recommended to search for environmental causes that give rise to upper GI pathologies. Further studies incorporating genetic and molecular testing are recommended to better understand the molecular mechanisms of upper GI malignancies.

Non-neoplastic lesions were more common than neoplastic lesions in oesophagusNon-neoplastic lesions were more common than neoplastic lesions in stomach

References

[1]Blackstone MO, Endoscopic interpretation Normal and pathologic appearances of Gastrointestinal tract 1984 New YorkRaven Press:13-15.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Gulia SP, Chaudhury M, Noorunnisa N, Balakrishnan CD, Balagurunathan K, Interpretation of upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic mucosal biopsies: A study conducted in teaching hospital in Puducherry, India Int J Med Health Sci 2012 1(3):17-24.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Afzal S, Ahmad M, Mubarik A, Saeed F, Rafi S, Saleem N, Morphological spectrum of gastric lesions endoscopic biopsy findings Pak Armed Forces Med J 2006 56(2):143-49.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Islam SKMJ, Ahmed ASMM, Ahamad MSU, Hafiz SAMMA, Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal lesions, experience in a port city of Bangladesh CMOHSMC 2014 13:11-14.10.3329/cmoshmcj.v13i3.20997  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[5]Jeshtadi A, Mohammad AM, Kadaru MR, Nagamuthu EA, Kalangi H, Boddu A, Study of gastric biopsies with clinicopathological correlation-A tertiary care centre experience J Evid Based Med Healthc 2016 3(57):2937-40.10.18410/jebmh/2016/639  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019  [Google Scholar]

[7]Cooper GS, Indications and contraindications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America 1994 4(3):439-54.10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30489-6  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Krishnappa R, Horakerappa MS, Karar A, Mangala G, A study on histopathological spectrum of upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic biopsies Int J Med Res Health Sci 2013 2:418-24.10.5958/j.2319-5886.2.3.073  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[9]Bhat N, Sheikh BA, Mir JN, Reshi R, Wani LA, Farooq S, Histopathological study of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies-One year prospective study British Biomedical Bulletin 2018 6(2):315  [Google Scholar]

[10]Rani D, Bhuvan S, Gupta A, A study of morphological spectrum of upper gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopy and correlation between endoscopic and histopathological findings Indian J of Pathol and Oncol 2019 6(1):28-34.10.18231/2394-6792.2019.0005  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Bhargavi M, Manjunath HK, Geethamani V, Dharani VC, Sushma TA, Akshatha B, Histomorphological analysis of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies: A retrospective study of 106 cases National Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2019 8(4):PO04-PO07.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Theresa JM, Lavanya M, Gerard RJ, Basha SK, Evaluating the spectrum of histomorphological patterns on endoscopic biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract disorders J Tropical Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 2020 6(1):01-09.10.17511/jopm.2020.i01.01  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Duraisamy PR, Chithambram L, Ibrahim SS, Madasamy K, Balan LK, Thandavarayan K, Histomorphology of upper GI Endoscpic biopsies: A study in urban care centre Annals of Applied Bio-Sciences 2017 4(4):A188-94.10.21276/AABS.1775  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Peixoto A, Silva M, Pereira P, Macedo G, Biopsies in gastrointestinal endoscopy: When and how GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology 2016 23(1):19-27.10.1016/j.jpge.2015.07.00428868426  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Loughrey MB, Johnston BT, Guidance on the effective use of upper gastrointestinal histopathology Frontline Gastroenterol 2014 5:88-95.10.1136/flgastro-2013-10041428840905  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Sharaf RN, Shergill AK, Odze RD, Krinsky ML, Fukami N, Jain R, Endoscopic mucosal tissue sampling Gastrointest Endosc 2013 78:216-24.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Geetha Ch, Pavani M, Shailaja P, Deshpande AK, Histomorphological spectrum of colonic biopsies: A two-year study IJPO 2018 5(2):242-48.  [Google Scholar]