JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/46147.14259
Year : 2020 | Month : Nov | Volume : 14 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : EC28 - EC32

A Study of Significance of Poorly Differentiated Clusters in Colorectal Carcinomas: Association with Histopathological Prognostic Factors

Shailja Maurya1, Sapna Patel2, Harish Srikantegowda3

1 Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and MPMMCC, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
3 Professor, Department of General Surgery, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Shailja Maurya, 1514/2, Civil Line No. 2, Barahiyaveer, Sultanpur-226022, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: shailjam90@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide with prevalence rate of 47 million per five years and 1.8 million new cases per year. Routinely differentiation-based histologic grading of CRC is used, but its clinical impact is limited by insufficient prognostic value, inter-observer variability and the difficulty of its application to specific CRC’s like mucinous, micropapillary, signet ring cell and medullary carcinomas. To overcome this, Poorly Differentiated Cluster (PDC) based grading have been proposed recently in 2012 by Ueno H et al., PDC is defined as a solid cancer cell nest comprising ≥5 cancer cells, lacking a gland-like structure.

Aim

To compare PDC based grading with conventional World Health Organisation (WHO) grading in redivted specimens of colorectal adenocarcinomas and to evaluate the relationship of PDC grading with known prognostic histopathological parameters.

Materials and Methods

The present study was a descriptive study done duration of three years and two months in the Department of Pathology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. A total of 60 CRC cases were studied. WHO grading was done according to eighth edition, 2018 of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained slides were studied by two pathologists and looked for inter-observer variability by k statistics. Finally, both pathologists arrived at a consensus and was subjected for PDC grading and correlated with other prognostic histological markers. The comparison of data was done by Pearson’s Chi-square test and t-test. The p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Fleiss-Cohen’s weighted k statistics was used for the assessment of inter-observer variability in tumour grading.

Results

There was significant association between PDC grading and WHO grading with k-value of 0.852 and p-value of 0.001. The maximum cases on PDC grading were of G-II type-29 (48.3%) followed by G-III-25 (41.7%) and G-I-6 (10%). There was increase in G-II and G-III carcinomas, as mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinomas were also graded with PDC which was not possible with current WHO grading system.

Conclusion

Present study findings suggest that PDC grading is more reproducible and provides better prognostic stratification as it is less subjective than the conventional WHO grading.

Keywords

Introduction

Globally, CRC is the third most common cancer with 1.8 million new cases per year and a prevalence rate of 47 million per five years [1,2]. In the year 2012, an estimated death due to CRC was approximately 7 lacs. According to Globocon 2018 there were total of 27 thousand new cases of CRC in India [1]. CRC is common in North America, Australia, and Europe when compared to other parts of the globe. A higher burden of CRC is thought to be due to westernised habits [3,4]. In contrast, registries in Asia, Africa, and South America have the lower rates of CRC’s [3]. The typical Indian diet is lower in calories consisting of more fruits and green leafy vegetables. This along with increased physical activity results in lower obesity rates [5,6]. Unfortunately, even inspite of low incidence rates in India, CRC is associated with a low five year survival rate.

For deciding treatment and prognosis, clinicopathological staging of CRC is carried out using the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system [7,8]. However, a good number of CRC’s demonstrate local or distant recurrence in spite of being categorised as low risk by the TNM system. This failure of TNM staging to serve as a reliable prognostic method for patients with intermediate-stage tumours may be overcome by other factors like morphology, molecular methods or treatment that can stratify patients more precisely into different categories of risk.

Thus, the search for additional methods to assess the prognosis of patients with CRC had been a major research focus [7,9]. The routine use of histological prognostic factors like tumour depth, tumour differentiation, Lympho-Vascular Invasion (LVI), Perineural Invasion (PNI) and tumour budding to demonstrate the risk of nodal dissemination in CRC is limited by their high inter-observer variability and low standards. More recently, a novel histological grading system has been highlighted as a histopathological prognostic indicator of CRC. This system considers PDC as clusters composed of ≥5 cancer cells present at the invasive front of the tumour lacking full gland formation, and it may predict the metastatic potential of CRC. PDC assessment in comparison to above mentioned histological predictors is considered more promising [10].

Hence, the present study was done to compare PDC based grading with conventional WHO grading system in resected specimens of CRC’s and to evaluate its relationship with known prognostic histopathological parameters such as TNM staging, LVI, PNI, Desmoplastic Reaction (DR) and Crohn’s Like Lymphoid Reaction (CLR).

Materials and Methods

It was a descriptive study done in the Department of Pathology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India, for duration between September 2015 to March 2019.

Sample size estimation was done using formula- S=4 PQ/d2 where, P=Prevalence (from previous studies), Q=100-P, d=allowable error (5-20% of P). Sixty histopathologically diagnosed CRC’s including heterogenous CRC’s were included in the study and cases with preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded.

Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC no. JSSMC/PG/4700/2017-18) approval was taken. The clinical and histopathological data was retrieved and 3 μm thick sections were obtained from paraffin blocks and stained with H&E. For all prospective cases gross examination [Table/Fig-1] was done and slides were reviewed by two pathologists to observe the interobserver reproducibility who were blinded to the patient’s clinical information and the tumours were graded according to the recommendations of the WHO-2010 criteria’s. Well differentiated (>95% gland) [Table/Fig-2a], moderately differentiated (50-95% gland) [Table/Fig-2b], poorly differentiated (0-45% gland) [Table/Fig-2c], mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma. Staging was done according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging System [8]. Finally, both pathologists arrived at a consensus, which was later subjected to PDC grading.

Gross specimen of colon showing ulceroinfiltrative growth.

a) Showing back to back arrangement of tumour cells in glandular pattern (H&E, x100); b) Showing tumour cells arranged in irregular glandular pattern (H&E, x100); c) Showing tumour cells arranged in solid sheets (H&E, x100).

PDC was evaluated in representative H&E stained slides at the advancing edge of the tumour and counting was done in the microscopic field of x20 objective lens (i.e., 1 mm microscopic field).

Poorly Differentiated Clusters

Poorly Differentiated Clusters (PDC) are defined as cancer cell clusters in the tumour stroma composed of ≥5 cancer cells and lacking a gland-like structure, regardless of the size of the cluster. The results were quantified as grades: Grade 1: <5 clusters [Table/Fig-3a]; Grade 2: 5-9 clusters [Table/Fig-3b]; Grade 3: ≥10 clusters. With regard to the assessment of mucinous carcinoma [Table/Fig-3c], malignant clusters without tubule formation with infiltration into the stroma and minimal extracellular mucin were classified as PDC’s. Also, clusters with invasive micropapillary pattern or signet ring cells [Table/Fig-3d] were accepted as PDC’s if they had clustering and no tubule formation.

a): Grade I PDC with 2 PDC clusters (H&E, x200); b): Grade II PDC with 9 PDC clusters (H&E, x200); c): Grade III mucinous adenocarcinoma showing >10 PDC clusters (H&E, x200); d): Grade II signet ring cell carcinoma showing >5 PDC clusters (H&E, x200).

The following histopathological prognostic markers were studied: 1) Depth of invasion pT; Nodal Staging; 3) LVI, detection of cancer cells in peritumoural or intramural vessels [Table/Fig-4a]; 4) PNI, defined as tumour cells surrounding at least one-third of the nerve bundle and invading through the nerve sheath [Table/Fig-4b]; 5) The CLR, lymphoid aggregates embedded in a collagenous stroma within muscularis propria or pericolic fibroadipose tissue in advancing edge of CRC [Table/Fig-4c]; 6) DR, cancer-associated response of fibroblasts at the invasive front. Its presence or absence was mentioned with no further grading of DR [Table/Fig-4d]. In present study, CLR was just labelled as present or absent.

a): Showing Lymphovascular Invasion (LVI) (H&E, x200; b): Showing Perineural Invasion (PNI) (H&E, x200); c): Showing Crohn’s Like Lymphoid Reaction (CLR) (H&E, x 200); d): Showing desmoplastic stromal reaction (H&E, x400).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 computer program. All continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD (Standard Deviation) and categorical variables as percentage. The comparison of data from multiple groups was made by Pearson’s chi-square test and p-value was calculated. For interobserver variability independent sample t-test was used for calculating p-value. The p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fleiss-Cohen’s weighted k statistics was also used for the assessment of inter-observer variability in tumour grading.

Results

Among 60 cases studied, the age of the patients ranged from 30 years to 82 years, with mean age of 59.13±13.85 years. Maximum number of patients belonged to 6th and 7th decades, amounting to total 30 cases (50%). A total of 28 (47%) were males and 32 (53%) were females with Male:Female ratio of 1:0.87. Commonest location of CRC was colon amounting to 36 cases (60%) followed by 15 cases (25%) in rectum and 9 cases (15%) in caecum [Table/Fig-5].

Representing age, sex, location, WHO and PDC grading in colorectal carcinomas.

FeatureG1G2G3Totalp-value
Total cases6292560
Age30-82 years (mean-59.13±13.85)
GenderMale28 (47%)
Female32 (53%)
M:F ratio1:0.87
SiteColon31815360.077
Caecum1179
Rectum210315
WHO grading pathologist 1WD*33170.007
MD*1231438
PD*0044
MAC*2259
SRCC*0011
WHO grading pathologist 2WD*34180.003
MD*1231337
PD*0055
MAC*2259
SRCC0011
pTT110010.136
T229920
T33181435
T4a0224
pN#N041615350.12
N117412
N21168
LVIYes21918390.203
No410721
PNIYes175130.890
No5222047
DRYes31916380.770
No310922
CLRYes62121480.247
No08412

*G1-PDC Grade 1, G2-PDC Grade 2, G3-PDC Grade 3; #There were five pN cases i.e lymphnodes

WD: Well differentiated; MD: Moderately differentiated; PD: Poorly differentiated; MAC: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; SRCC: Signet ring cell carcinoma; T: Tumour; N: Node; LVI: Lympho vascular invasion; PNI: Perineural invasion; DR: Desmoplastic Reaction, CLR: Chron’s like lymphoid reaction


WHO Grading

According to pathologist 1, 38 cases (63%) were reported as moderately differentiated followed by nine cases (15%) of mucinous adenocarcinomas, seven cases (11%) of well differentiated, four cases (7%) of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and one case (2%) of signet ring cell adenocarcinoma, while pathologist 2 reported 37 cases (61.7%) of moderately differentiated, eight cases (13.3%) of well differentiated and five cases (8.3%) of poorly differentiated while numbers of mucinous adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma were same as pathologist 1 [Table/Fig-2a-c]. Finally, both pathologists arrived at a consensus which was later subjected to PDC grading [Table/Fig-5].

PDC Grading

According to PDC grading, maximum cases fell in the grade-II category followed by grade-III and grade-I. A total of 29 cases (48.3%) were of grade-II followed by 25 (41.7%) grade-III and only six cases (10%) of grade-I categories [Table/Fig-3a-d,5].

Histological Prognostic Markers

Lympho Vascular Invasion (LVI) was positive in 39 cases [Table/Fig-5]. Among them 19 cases were from grade-II, 18 cases from grade-III followed by two cases from grade-I. PNI was positive in 13 cases [Table/Fig-5], among them seven cases were from grade-II followed by five cases from grade-III and one case from grade-I. Forty eight cases (80%) showed CLR at the invasive front of the tumour. In rest 12 cases (20%) it was absent [Table/Fig-5]. Thirty eight cases (63%) showed DR [Table/Fig-4d] while rest 22 cases (37%) were negative for the same [Table/Fig-5]. DR was reported as either positive or negative but was not graded into mature, intermediate and immature forms in present study. In T3 category there were 35 cases (58.3%) followed by 20 cases (3.3%) of T2, four cases (6.7%) of T4a and one case of T1. There were no cases of T4b. The patients were grouped using the TNM staging for lymph node as pNx in five cases (8.3%) where lymph node status could not be assessed. There were 35 cases of pN0 (58.3%), four cases (6.7%) showed metastasis in 1 regional lymph node (pN1a), five (8.3%) cases in 2 to 3 regional lymph nodes (pN1b), three cases (5%) showed tumour deposits in the subserosa, mesentery or non-peritonealised pericolic region (pN1c), five cases (8.3%) showed metastasis in 4-6 regional lymph nodes (pN2a), three cases (5%) showed metastasis in 7 or more regional lymph nodes (pN2b).

Inter-observer Variability between two Pathologists

Inter-observer variability among pathologists was maximum in diagnosing poorly differentiated carcinoma followed by mucinous adenocarcinoma. There was a significant association between two pathologists with k-value of 0.852 and p-value of 0.001 which was statistically significant [Table/Fig-6].

Showing inter-observer variability between two pathologists.

Association of observation by pathologist 1 and pathologist 2WHO gradePercentage
Well differentiated100%
Moderately differentiated94.7%
Poorly differentiated75%
Signet ring cell carcinoma100%
Mucinous adenocarcinoma80%

PDC with WHO Grading

Fleiss-Cohen’s weighted k statistics was used for the assessment of inter-observer variability in tumour grading. There was a significant association between PDC grading and WHO grading done by Pathologist-1 and Pathologist 2 with p-value of 0.007 (≤0.05) and 0.003 (≤0.05) respectively. Finally, both pathologists arrived at a consensus, which was later subjected to PDC grading [Table/Fig-5].

Discussion

One of the leading and most common causes of human cancer-related death is CRC [11]. The most widely used pathologic variables in histologic grading of CRC was framed by WHO and AJCC, but however it is very difficult to accurately define it due to difficulty in categorising variable degrees of differentiation which is one of the most distinctive characterstic features of this tumour. Till date, no single standard international criteria have been established for deciding whether grading should be diagnosed based on predominant pattern of differentiation or on considering the area of least differentiation [12]. Prognosis and treatment decisions of CRC’s are made primarily based on the extent of the disease, as defined by the TNM staging system. Unfortunately, a good number of CRC’s behave poor in spite of being labelled as low risk based on their TNM staging system [7]. Many studies have been taken up saying that PDC’s are independent prognostic factors in CRC’s and hence PDC assessment has a strong influence to increase prognostic accuracy and also to frame the treatment algorithms. In the present study, 60 resected cases of colorectal adenocarcinomas were graded according to the number of PDC’s as defined by Ueno H et al., and were analysed to determine the relationship of PDC grades with known histopathological prognostic factors [13]. Maximum number of patients was in the age group of 6th and 7th decades which was comparable with studies done by Kinoshita O et al., Ueno H et al., and Baressi V et al., [14-16]. There was female predominance with male to female ratio of 1:0.87 and was comparable with the study done by Kinoshita O et al., Colon was the commonest location followed by rectum and caecum [14].

Histological Grade and Inter-observer Variability

The issue of reproducibility in any tumour is always related to histopathologic diagnosis, and tumour grading is not an exception for this rule. The objective judgement of the WHO grading is therefore very problematic with significant inter-observer variability and the k-value of this 3-tiered WHO grading system was reported variously. Study done by Chandler IP and Houlston RS showed k-value of 0.35 [17], another study done by Ueno H et al., had k-value of 0.52 [13] and in the present study k-value was 0.852 with p-value of 0.001 which was statistically significant [Table/Fig-7].

Showing comparison between WHO and PDC grading ]12,13,16].

Comparison of histological grade of the present study with other studies
StudyTotal no. of casesWDMDPDMAC
Kim JW et al., [12]20145133167
Ueno H et al., [13]5002102471330
Present studyPathologist 16073949
Pathologist 26083759
Comparison of PDC grading with other studies
StudyG-IG-IIG-III
Ueno H et al., [13]156198146
Kim JW et al., [12]855858
Basressi V et al., [16]854324
Present Study62925
Comparison of PDC and WHO grading with present study and other studies
G-IG-IIIG-II
Ueno H et al., [13]
WD*868539p-value<0.0001
MD*5610190
PD*238
MAC*1299
Kim JW et al., [12]
WD*3564p-value<0.001
MD*524833
PD*0314
MAC*313

*WD: Well differentiated; MD: Moderately differentiated; PD: Poorly differentiated; MAC: Mucinous adenocarcinoma


Poorly Differentiated Clusters (PDC)

Present study showed maximum cases falling into grade-II category which correlated with study done by Ueno H et al., while other studies showed maximum of grade-I followed by grade-II and grade-III [Table/Fig-7] [13].

PDC with WHO Grading of CRC

Present study proved that PDC grading has a more proportionate distribution of tumours compared to WHO grading. By WHO grading, 63% were moderately differentiated, 11% well differentiated, 7% poorly differentiated and rest 15% were mucinous adenocarcinomas. By PDC grading, G-II and G-III tumours increased to 48.3% and 41.7% respectively while G-I was only 10% with p-value of 0.003 which was statistically very significant. This also reflects biological aggressiveness of mucinous and signet ring cell carcinomas. Thus, PDC grading has strong ability to stratify patients into prognostic outcome compared to WHO grading. Present study with p-value of 0.003 is in concordance with the studies done by and Kim JW et al., Ueno H et al., with p-value<0.001 in all the three studies [Table/Fig-7] [12,13].

PDC Grading with Histopathological Prognostic Markers

In the present study, majority of cases were of pT3 (58.3%) followed by pT2 (33.3%) and pT4a (6.7%) which was comparable with study done by Baressi V et al., [10] while other studies showed pT3 followed by pT4a and pT2 except by Kim JW et al., [12] which showed pT3 followed by pT1, pT2, and pT4. Number of T3 and T2 cases was high in present study as most of the patient presented with advanced stage [Table/Fig-5]. Present study did not show any significant association between PDC and depth of invasion (pT) with p-value of 0.136 which was comparable to study done by Baressi V et al., [Table/Fig-5] [10]. In 5 (8.3%) out of 60 cases, lymph nodes could not be assessed in present study. The maximum cases were of N0 followed by N1 and N2 which was in concordance with other studies done by Barresi V et al., Kim JW et al., Ueno H et al., and Ueno H et al., [10,12,13,15]. There was near significant association between nodal staging and PDC grading with p-value of 0.12 [Table/Fig-5]. Patients with LVI and PNI tumours were more likely to have poor differentiation, high PDC grade, increased depth of invasion and advanced N category as found in present study with increased cases of PDC G-II and G-III tumours. One of the histological hallmark of invasive CRC is the response of fibrotic stroma induced by a tumour [18]. In present study, maximum cases with DR fell into G-II followed by G-III and G-I [Table/Fig-5]. CLR was associated with lower rate of loco regional recurrence, lesser distant metastasis, good cancer-specific and overall survival rate [19]. In present study, 48 out of 60 had CLR.

Limitation(s)

Main limitation of this study was that our institute is not cancer centre thus sample size was limited and this can be the reason for not finding significant association between PDC and histological predictors.

Conclusion(s)

Poorly differentiated clusters grading is a novel grading system and is more superior than WHO grading system in terms of inter-observer agreement and prognostic power. It is also proved that specific types like mucinous and signet ring cell carcinomas can be graded by the PDC grading system, as the current WHO system cannot be applied to all CRC types. Hence, PDC grading can be used as a new upcoming parameter having stability in distinguishing prognostic events and in planning therapy. There is a strong need to eliminate the inter-observer variability for the better prognosis and treatment of patients with CRC’s. PDCs is relatively a new parameter and is not much studied yet. This grading system deserves to be studied in a larger population of patients with CRC’s to further test its reproducibility, prognostic value and its significance in histological subtypes.

*G1-PDC Grade 1, G2-PDC Grade 2, G3-PDC Grade 3; #There were five pN cases i.e lymphnodesWD: Well differentiated; MD: Moderately differentiated; PD: Poorly differentiated; MAC: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; SRCC: Signet ring cell carcinoma; T: Tumour; N: Node; LVI: Lympho vascular invasion; PNI: Perineural invasion; DR: Desmoplastic Reaction, CLR: Chron’s like lymphoid reaction

References

[1]Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of Incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 1885 countries CA Cancer J Clin 2018 68:394-424.10.3322/caac.2149230207593  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J, Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008 Int J Cancer 2013 132:1133-45.10.1002/ijc.2771122752881  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E, Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer CA Cancer J Clin 2009 59:366-78.10.3322/caac.2003819897840  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A, Colorectal cancer statistics 2017 CA Cancer J Clin 2017 67:177-93.10.3322/caac.2139528248415  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]National Cancer Registry Programme (2010) Development of an atlas of cancer in India. First all India report: 2001-2002. Available from http://www.canceratlasindia.org/chapter3_5.aspx. Accessed 2018  [Google Scholar]

[6]Pathy S, Lambert R, Sauvaget C, Sankaranarayanan R, The incidence and survival rates of colorectal cancer in Indian remain low compared with rising rates in East Asia Dis Colon Rectum 2012 5:900-06.10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825afc4e22810477  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Puppa G, Sonzogni A, Colombari R, Pelosi G, TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: A critical appraisal of challenging issues Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010 134:837-52.10.5858/134.6.83720524862  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Nagtegaal ID, Arends MJ, Odze RD, Lam AK, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours 2019 5th edition. Tumors of the colon and rectumLyonIARC Press  [Google Scholar]

[9]Mitrovic B, Schaeffer DF, Riddell RH, Kirsch R, Tumour budding in colorectal carcinoma: Time to take notice Mod Pathol 2012 25:131510.1038/modpathol.2012.9422790014  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Barresi V, Branca G, Ieni A, Reggiani Bonetti L, Baron L, Mondello S, Poorly Differentiated Clusters (PDCs) as a novel histological predictor of nodal metastases in pT1 colorectal cancer Virchows Arch 2014 464:655-62.10.1007/s00428-014-1580-z24771119  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M, Cancer statistics, 2001 CA Cancer J Clin 2001 51:15-36.10.3322/canjclin.51.1.1511577478  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Kim JW, Shin MK, Kim BC, Clinicopathological impacts of poorly differentiated cluster-based grading system in colorectal carcinoma J Korean Med Sci 2015 30:16-23.10.3346/jkms.2015.30.1.1625552879  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Ueno H, Kajiwara Y, Shimazaki H, Shinto E, Hashiguchi Y, Nakanishi K, New criteria for histologic grading of colorectal cancer Am J Surg Pathol 2012 36:193-201.10.1097/PAS.0b013e318235edee22251938  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Kinoshita O, Kishimoto M, Murayama Y, Kuriu Y, Nakanishi M, Sakakura C, The number of metastatic lymph nodes exhibiting poorly differentiated clusters predicts survival in patients with pStage III colorectal cancer Int J Colorectal Dis 2016 31:283-90.10.1007/s00384-015-2393-526412250  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Ueno H, Hase K, Hashiguchi Y, Shimazaki H, Tanaka M, Miyake O, Site-specific tumour grading system in colorectal cancer: Multicenter pathologic review of the value of quantifying poorly differentiated clusters Am J Surg Pathol 2014 38:197-204.10.1097/PAS.000000000000011324418853  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Barresi V, Bonetti LR, Ieni A, Domati F, Tuccari G, Prognostic significance of grading based on the counting of poorly differentiated clusters in colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma Hum. Pathol 2015 46:1722-29.10.1016/j.humpath.2015.07.01326344416  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Chandler IP, Houlston RS, Interobserver agreement in grading of colorectal cancers-findings from a nationwide web-based survey of histopathologists Histopathology 2008 52:49410.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.02976.x18315602  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Ueno H, Shinto E, Shimazaki H, Kajiwara Y, Sueyama T, Yamamoto J, Histologic categorization of desmoplastic reaction: Its relevance to the colorectal cancer microenvironment and prognosis Ann Surg Oncol 2015 22:1504-12.10.1245/s10434-014-4149-925395146  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Maoz A, Dennis M, Greenson JK, The crohn’s-like lymphoid reaction to colorectal cancer-tertiary lymphoid structures with immunologic and potentially therapeutic relevance in colorectal cancer Front Immunol 2019 10:188410.3389/fimmu.2019.0188431507584  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]