JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Anatomy Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/46743.14247
Year : 2020 | Month : Nov | Volume : 14 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : AC01 - AC04

Variation in Facial Index and Nasal Index in Western Maharashtrian Males- An Anthropometric Study

Laxmi Prashant Nivale1, Achleshwar Gandotra2, RR Karambalekar3

1 Ph.D Scholar, SBKS Medical College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India; Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Prakash Institute of Medical Science and Research, Urun-Islampur, Maharashtra, India.
2 Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, SBKS Medical College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Prakash Institute of Medical Science and Research, Urun-Islampur, Maharashtra, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Laxmi Prashant Nivale, Ph.D Scholar, SBKS Medical College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara-391760, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: pnivale@rediffmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Facial anthropometry had proved its great importance in the field of facial reconstructive surgery as well as in the field of forensic science. Specific face types and nose types provides us important information about specific types of races.

Aim

To study the morphometric variation in facial index and nasal index as well as different types of faces and types of noses in the Western Maharashtrian males.

Materials and Methods

An observational study was carried out in the five cities- Sangli, Kolhapur, Islampur, Karad and Satara of Western Maharashtra, India. Total 535 male students of different colleges between the age group of 18-20 years were selected and measurements were taken with the help of Digital Vernier Calliper in the sitting position after due approval from Institutional Ethical Committees and informed consent. The methodology adopted for the measurements was taken from the guidelines given by Farkas LG in his book-“Anthropometric facial proportions in Medicine”.

Results

The mean facial index of Western Maharashtrian males was 89.51 with standard deviation 4.26 and dominant face type was leptoprosopic which was 46.73% and rare type of face was hypereuriprosopic which was 0.19%. Mean nasal index of Western Maharashtrian males was 72.84 with standard deviation 6.86 and dominant nose type was mesorrhine which was 63.74%.

Conclusion

Certain facial and nasal features are common in particular racial group. Its detection can be helpful in reconstructive facial surgeries.

Keywords

Introduction

Anthropometric study of human beings had its roots in ancient days still it is used commonly all over the world as it has proven its importance in the field of cosmetic surgery, facial reconstructive surgery, and dental treatments and also in forensic science [1]. Anthropometric studies are scientific methods and techniques for displaying different measurement and observation on the human being as well as skeleton. Anthropometric studies are very important area for craniofacial surgery and syndromology [2]. Study of nose is also useful in the determination of race and sex of individual or group whose identity is unknown [3]. Facial index in general and nasal index in particular are useful in forensic investigations [4]. Facial index and nasal index provides us an important information about race and ethnicity. By knowing nasal index and type of nose it can be concluded about climatic condition. According to theory of natural selection, people who lives in cold and dry weather possesses long and narrow type of nose and who lives in warm and moist weather possesses broad nose [5]. With this background, the present study was conducted with an aim to study different facial and nasal parameters in adult male population of Western Maharashtra, India.

Materials and Methods

This was an observational type of study carried out from March 2018 to January 2020 over 535 male students of following colleges as shown in [Table/Fig-1]. After getting due approval from both the Institutes: Prakash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Urun-Islampur (Ref No.-PSM/PIMSR/24013/2018) and Sumandeep Vidyapeeth University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India (SVIEC/IN/MEDI/PHD/18004) the study was conducted. NOC letter was obtained from Dean/Principal of respective college. The procedure and purpose of the study was explained to the participants and then written consent was obtained from them.

Number of students recruited from different cities and colleges.

Sr. No.RegionCollege nameNo. of students
1IslampurPrakash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Urun- Islampur93
Loknete Rajaram Bapu Patil Ayurvedic Medical College30
2KolhapurDr JJ Magdum College of Engineering, Jaysingpur52
Dr JJ Magdum Homoeopathic Medical College, Jaysingpur27
Dr JJ Magdum Ayurvedic Medical College, Jaysingpur22
3SangliHon. Shri Annasaheb Dange Ayurvedic Medical College, Post Gradute and Research Centre, Ashta38
Hon. Shri Annasaheb Dange College of Pharmacy (B.Pharm)46
Hon. Shri. Annasaheb Dange College of Pharmacy (D.Pharm)27
4SataraGourishankar Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Limb45
Mahalaxmi Institute of Pharmacy (D. Pharm), Raigaon28
Late. Narayandas Bhawandas Chhabada Institute of Pharmacy, Raigaon25
5KaradKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences “Deemed To Be University” Karad84
Krishna Institute of Nursing Science, Karad18

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: All the participants were residing in the respective city from their forefathers, after taking personal and family history in brief with an age range of 18-20 years were included. This age group was selected because development of face has been completed at 18 years. Students who were not resident of Western Maharashtra were excluded from the study. Individuals with normal craniofacial configuration were selected and those who were having background of genetically transmitted disorders like cleft lip, cleft palate were also excluded from the study.

Calibrated Standard Vernier calliper (30 centimetre length with accuracy of 0.01 mm) was used to take facial measurements. All the facial soft tissue landmarks were first marked with the help of skin marking pencil and then the measurements were taken in sitting position by the author by standing in front of the participants. Keeping the left hand on the head of the subject and holding the tip of upper arm of the calliper with thumb and index finger on the marked point of face and sliding the lower arm of calliper in upward direction up to desired marking so that the tip just touches the desired point. Participants were asked to remain quiet with erect neck with gently closed lips and avoid talking or laughing while taking measurements. All the facial measurements were taken in millimetres.

The following facial measurements were taken-

2a) Facial Height/length (n-mn/gn)- distance between nasion (n) to menton (mn/gn); 2b) Facial width/breadth- distance between right and left zygion (zy-zy); 2c) Height/Length of nose (n-sn)- distance between nasion (n) to subnasale (sn); 2d) Width of nose (al-al)- distance between right and left alar of nose [Table/Fig-2a-d].

a) Showing measurement of face height (n-mn); b) Showing measurement of face width (zy-zy); c) Shows height of nose (n-sn); d) Shows width of nose (al-al).

Facial index: Face length (n-mn/gn)/Face width (zy-zy)×100.

It is called as prosopic facial index and different face types were categorised according to Banister classification [6] in the text book of medical anthropometry by Farkas LG in Anthropometric facial proportion in Medicine [7] which are as follows:

1) Hypereuriprosopic (very broad face)- when the facial index is lesser than or equal to 79.9 [Table/Fig-3].

Different types of faces. (Image from left to right)

2) Euriprosopic (broad face)- when the facial index is between 80 to 84.9 [Table/Fig-4].

3) Mesoprosopic (round face)- when the facial index is between 85 to 89.9 [Table/Fig-5].

4) Leptoprosopic (long face)- when the facial index is between 90 to 95 [Table/Fig-6].

5) Hyperleptoprosopic (very long face)- when the facial index is above 95 [Table/Fig-7].

Nasal index: Width of nose (al-al)/Length of nose (n-sn)×100.

Paul Topinard (1830-1911) defined the nasal index [8]. On the basis of this index, the following three types of noses were categorised:

1] Leptorrhine (long nose)- when the nasal index <70.

2] Mesorrhine (medium nose)- when the nasal index is between 70 to 84.9.

3] Platyrrhine (flat nose)- when the nasal index is >85.

Statistical Analysis

All the collected data were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis (mean, standard deviation). It was analysed by using descriptive statistics. Software used was R statistical software with 3.5 version.

Results

Mean face height (142.54 mm), face width (125.85 mm), nose height (52.76 mm) and nose width (38.27 mm) are shown in [Table/Fig-8] with standard deviation. The study results showed that mean facial index in Western Maharashtrian males was 89.51 with standard deviation 4.26 and mean nasal index was 72.84 with standard deviation 6.86 [Table/Fig-9].

Mean- facial length, facial width, nose length, nose width with standard deviation.

VariableMean (mm)Standard deviation
Face length142.546.68
Face width125.855.52
Nose length52.764.04
Nose width38.272.72

Mean, standard deviation, maximum and minimum values for facial and nasal index.

VariableMeanStandard deviationMinimumMaximum
Facial index89.514.2689.4791.39
Nasal index72.846.8655.7489.74

The dominant type of male face was leptoprosopic (46.73%). Similarly, the dominant nose type was mesorrhine (63.74%) followed by leptorrhine (34.02%) [Table/Fig-10,11].

Distribution of face types in Western Maharashtrian males.

Type of faceNo. of subjectsPercent
Euriprosopic10319.25%
Hypereuriprosopic10.19%
Hyperleptoprosopic142.62%
Leptoprosopic25046.73%
Mesoprosopic16731.21%
Total535100%

Distribution of nose types in Western Maharashtrian males.

Type of noseNo. of subjectsPercent
Leptorrhine18234.02%
Mesorrhine34163.74%
Platyrrhine122.24%
Total535100%

Discussion

The present study results showed the predominant face type of Western Maharashtrian males was leptoprosopic. It correlates with study done in South Indian and North Indian population by Ashwini C et al., [9]. It is also in conformity with Uttarakhand males by Ansari S et al., [10]. It contradicts with males in Haryana by Anand S et al., and with Gujarati males by Kanan U et al., [11,12].

From [Table/Fig-12], it was clear that Serbian male (Jeremic D et al.,) showed similar face type with Western Maharashtrian males while Nepali males (Pandey N et al.,), Malay males (Yesmin T et al.,) and Turkish males (Ozsahm E et al.,) were having different face type than males in present study [9-16].

Shows comparison of male face types with other studies in India in percentage [9-16].

Name of AuthorPopulationHypereuriprosopicEuriprosopicMesoprosopicLeptoprosopicHyperletoprosopic
Ashwini C and Karinagannanavar A [9]South India9.0918.1810.94021.81
North India014.2828.5746.4210.71
Ansari S et al., [10]Uttarakhand411283720
Anand S et al., [11]Haryana1143532716
Kanan U et al., [12]Gujarat35.24318.23.60
Pandey N et al., [13]Nepal132348.6613.332
Jeremic D et al., [14]Serbia0017.7876.675.56
Yesmin T et al., [15]Malay121845205
Ozsahm E et al., [16]Turkish18.135.3633.218.74.7
Present studyWestern Maharashtra0.1919.2531.2146.732.65

Present study showed the mean nasal index in Western Maharashtrian males was 72.84 and predominant nose type was mesorrhine. It correlates with the males of Sindhis in Rajasthan (Choudhary A and Choudhary DS), of Jammu and Kashmir (Jabeen N et al.,), of Karnataka and Kerala (Shivananad ND et al.,), of Uttar Pradesh (Ray SK et al.,), and Santhals of West Bengal (Shah MRI et al.,) in India whereas contradicts Jats in Rajasthan (Choudhary and Choudhary DS) [2] and Bengalis in West Bengal (Shah MRI et al.,) in India [Table/Fig-13] [2,4,17-21].

Shows comparison of nose types with other studies [2,4,17-21].

Author/YearPopulationNasal indexPredominant type of nose
Shivanand ND et al., (2016) [17]Karnataka73.37Mesorrhine
Kerala82.99Mesorrhine
Jabeen N et al., (2019) [4]Jammu and Kashmir72.15Mesorrhine
Ray SK et al., (2016) [18]Uttar Pradesh75.86Mesorrhine
Choudhary A and Choudhary DS (2012) [2]Jats68.09Leptorrhine
Sindhis70.72Mesorrhine
Shah MRI et al., (2015) [19]Santhals80.00Mesorrhine
Bengalis65.90Leptorrhine
Mohammad I et al., (2018) [20]Nigeria74.08Mesorrhine
Asthuta AR and Pradiptha IPY (2019) [21]Indonesia74.08Platyrrhine
Present studyWestern Maharashtra72.84Mesorrhine

The nose of Western Maharashtrian males correlates with Nigerian males (Mohammad I et al.,) but different from Indonesian male nose type Asthuta AR and Pradiptha IPY [20,21].

From the above results, it is clear that face types and nose type helps to determine the characteristic racial features. Present study results will help surgeons in facial reconstructive surgery and so, also in rhinoplasty of males.

Limitation(s)

As the study is focussed on only five cities of Western Maharashtra, the results of it cannot be generalised to whole of Western Maharashtra. More extensive work is required for generalisation.

Conclusion(s)

Certain human facial features are commonly found among certain racial groups or in any specific geographical place. By finding out such a specific face type will help in reconstructive and facial plastic surgeries. Furthermore, extensive study is required in this field to establish all the parameters of face. From this study, it is concluded that majority of Western Maharashtrian males were having leptoprosopic type of face 46.73% and mesorrhine type of nose (63.74%).

References

[1]Vegter F, Hage JJ, Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2000 106(5):1090-96.10.1097/00006534-200010000-0002111039382  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Choudhary A, Choudhary DS, Comparative anthropometric study of nasal parameters between two ethnic groups of Rajasthan state International Journal of Medicine and Public Health 2012 2(2):46-48.10.5530/ijmedph.2.2.10  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[3]Oladipo G, Udoaka A, Afolabi E, Manuel BI, Nasal parameters of Itsekiris and Urhobos of Nigeria Int J Biol Anthropol 2008 3:01-05.10.5580/91a  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Jabeen N, Magotra R, Choudhary S, Sharma AK, Study of nasal index in different zones of Jammu and Kashmir JK SCIENCE 2019 22(2):72-75.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Hall RL, Hall DA, Geographic variation of native people along the Pacific Coast Hum Biol 1995 67(3):407-26.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Banister M, Williams P, Dyson M, Dussak JE, Gray’s Anatomy 1995 38th edLondonChurchill Livingstone:607-12.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Farkas LG, Munro IR, Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine Charles Thomas Springfield 1987   [Google Scholar]

[8]Topinard P, Elements d’Anthropologie Generale, Paris 1885 Delahaye & Lecrosnier:244-307.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Ashwini C, Karinagannanavar A, A study of facial index among North and South Indian students of JSS Medical College International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research 2014 3(2):136-140.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Ansari S, Singala M, Ravi KS, Facial anthropometry in adult Jaunsari tribe population of Dehradun district of Uttarakhand Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2019 13(4):AC01-03.10.7860/JCDR/2019/40319.12795  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Anand S, Tripathi S, Chopra A, Khaneja K, Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face and their co-relation to phi among Indians in Moradabad population: A survey The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2015 15(2):12510.4103/0972-4052.15503326929498  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Kanan U, Gandotra A, Desai A, Andani R, Variation in facial index of Gujarati males- A photometric study International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences 2012 1(4):27-31.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Pandey N, Gogoi P, Budathoki D, Gopal KC, Anthropometric study of facial index of medical students Journal of Kathmandu Medical College 2015 4(4):131-34.10.3126/jkmc.v4i4.18256  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Jeremic D, Kocic S, Vulovic M, Sazdanovic M, Sazdanovic P, Jovanovic B, Anthropometric study of the facial index in the population of central Serbia Arch Biol Sci Belgrade 2013 65(3):1163-68.10.2298/ABS1303163J  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[15]Yesmin T, Thwin SS, Urmi SA, Wai MM, Zaini PF, Azwan K, A study of facial index among Malay Population Journal of Anthropology 2014 2014:72697410.1155/2014/726974  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[16]Ozsahm E, Kizilkanat E, Boyan N, Soames R, Oguz O, Evaluation of face shape in Turkish Individuals Int J Morphol 2016 34(3):904-08.10.4067/S0717-95022016000300015  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[17]Shivanand ND, Bidarkotimath S, Kumar S, Comparison of nasal index in Karnataka and Kerala population Journal of Evidence Base of Medicine and Health Care 2016 3(20):823-24.10.18410/jebmh/2016/187  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[18]Ray SK, Saha K, Kumar A, Banjare S, Anthropometric study of nasal index among the population of Western Uttar Pradesh Region International Journal Scientific Study 2016 4(2):65-70.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Shah MRI, Anwar S, Mandal DK, Yesmin S, Ahmad S, Anthropometry of the nose: A comparative study between adult male Santhals and Bengalis in Bangladesh Mediscope 2015 2(2):28-32.10.3329/mediscope.v2i2.25407  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[20]Mohammad I, Mokhtari T, Ijaz S, Omotosha AD, Ngaski AA, Milaniford M, Anthropometric study of nasal index in Hausa ethnic population of northwest Nigeria Contemp Med Sci 2018 4(1):26-29.10.22317/jcms.03201806  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[21]Asthuta AR, Pradiptha IPY, Anthropometric study of nasal index of the Bali aga population ORLI, Tahun 2019 49(1):35-39.10.32637/orli.v49i1.273  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]