JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/46078.14237
Year : 2020 | Month : Nov | Volume : 14 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : EC19 - EC22

Malignant Gastric Neoplasms: A Clinicopathological Study with Special Reference to Serum CA125 Level with Peritoneal Dissemination

Ankita Pranab Mandal1, Adahra Patricia Beso2, Mou Das3, Rama Saha4

1 Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
2 Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, GB Pant Hospital, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Rama Saha, FD-112, Salt Lake City, Sector-III, Kolkata-700106, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: ankitapmandal@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Gastric cancer is a malignant tumour with a fifth position amid all cancers and its mortality rate is third globally. The most common distant mode of metastasis is Peritoneal Dissemination (PD). There is a positive correlation between serum Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) level and PD in cases of malignant gastric neoplasm.

Aim

To study the demographic features, the macroscopic and microscopic features of malignant gastric neoplasm and the relation of serum CA125 level with PD in cases of gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

This cross-divtional observational study was conducted for two years from January, 2018 to January, 2020 on 120 cases at Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal (India). Detailed history taking, clinical examination, routine investigation was done. Peripheral blood sample for CA125 assay was collected. PD was identified through Ultrasonography (USG) or Computed Tomography (CT) or intraoperatively during open surgery. The gastrectomy specimens were sent for gross examination, staging and histopathology. Microsoft excel 2016 and SPSS 18 was used. Chi-square test was used for the comparison between the groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were used for elective assessment.

Results

This study comprised 120 cases with mean age of presentation as 54.3 years and male: female ratio of 2.3:1. Fifty cases (41.6%) were identified as tubular (solid)-poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with 59 cases (49.2%) of stage IIIA and 52 cases (43.3%) of stage IV. The sensitivity and specificity of CA125 was 81.8% and 85.7%. The PPV and NPV were 56.2% and 95.4%.

Conclusion

Early detection of peritoneal disease will help the clinicians to stratify the treatment of gastric cancers. Higher sensitivity suggests that preoperative serum CA125 is a promising tool to predict PD which aids in subsequent alternative mode of treatment, lesser morbidity and better survival of patients.

Keywords

Introduction

Gastric cancer is a malignant tumour with a fifth position amid all cancers and its mortality rate is third, globally [1]. But the frequency varies in several parts of the world. In India, amongst men it is the fifth most common cancer and in women it is in seventh position [2]. Multifactorial causation has an important role in gastric cancer which includes various dietary and environmental factors.

The most common distant mode of metastasis is PD. In such cases, a gastrectomy does not improve the prognosis but can rather hamper the patient’s quality of life [3]. Also, PD is the most common recurrence pattern after curative gastrectomy with extended lymphadectomy [4]. Computed Tomography (CT) scan, Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and laparoscopic evaluation are commonly used to detect PD but they are either inconvenient or overly complex, so surgeons face to unforeseen non-curative operation [5]. Serum tumour markers are usually used for prompt diagnosis of tumour burden and occult metastases in variety of cancer patients. CA125 is an antigenic determinant detected by a murine monoclonal antibody OC125 [6]. Initially, it has been used primarily as a tumour maker for ovarian cancer. However, many new studies suggest that the peritoneum is an important source of CA125 and that there is a positive correlation between serum CA125 level and PD in cases of malignant gastric neoplasm [7-9]. Advanced gastric cancer with PD has poor prognosis and so early detection is necessary. The objective was to study the clinical significance of serum CA125 and its relation to PD in cases of gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted for two years from January, 2018 to January, 2020 on 120 cases at Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal (India). Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (Registration No. ECR/35/Inst/WB/2013) and written informed consent from the patients was taken.

Inclusion criteria: All confirmed cases of malignant gastric neoplasm by endoscopic biopsy planned for gastrectomy and preoperative serum CA125 level done in confirmed malignant gastric neoplasm cases were included in the present study after taking proper informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: Cases with no preoperative serum CA125, received prior chemo-irradiation, critically ill patients unfit for surgery and those refused to give consent for the study were excluded.

Proper history, clinical examination, routine investigation was done according to the proforma. Rapid Urease Test (RUT) was also performed. Peripheral blood sample for CA125 assay was collected one week prior to surgery. The sera were analysed using an immunoradiometric assay (ovarian cancer antigen (OD289), Omega Diagnostics Ltd., UK). The cut-off value of CA125 was 35U/mL according to the manufacturer’s manual. This data was to be compared among the same patients diagnosed with PD. PD was identified through USG/CT or intraoperatively during open surgery. All the gastrectomy specimens were sent for gross examination, staging and histopathology. The paraffin embedded tissue blocks were subsequently stained for H&E.

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft excel 2016 and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18 (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Statistical forms were used to record the demographic, clinical, laboratory data of each patient. Chi-square test was used for the comparison between the groups. Categorical values were expressed as rate with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were used for elective assessment.

Results

This study comprised 120 cases. Patients in the age group of 51-60 years were most commonly affected [Table/Fig-1]. Mean age of presentation was 54.3 years. Men (84 cases, 70%) were affected mostly then women (36 cases, 30%). The male to female ratio was 2.3:1.

Age and sex-wise distribution of cases (N=120).

Age (in years)MaleFemaleTotalPercentage (%)
31-4065119.2
41-5017112823.3
51-6039104940.8
61-701992823.3
71-801121.7
81-902021.7
Total8436120100
Percentage (%)7030

Majority of the patients complained of anorexia (82 cases, 68%) followed by dyspepsia (60 cases, 50%), pallor (60 cases, 50%) and hematemesis (52 cases, 43%). Consumption of fermented fish/red meat was seen in 75 cases (62.5%) followed by smoking seen in 68 cases (56.7%) [Table/Fig-2]. Family history was present only in 2 cases. Of the total cases, RUT results showed positivity in 14 cases (11.6%). Partial gastrectomy (77 cases, 64.2%) was the most common specimen received [Table/Fig-2]. Antrum (56 cases, 46.6%) was the most common site involved followed by the body (24 cases, 20%) [Table/Fig-2].

Clinicopathological characteristics of the cases.

CategorySubcategoryNumber of cases (%)
Clinical complaintsAnorexia82 (68)
Dyspepsia60 (50)
Pallor60 (50)
Hematemesis52 (43)
Dietary historySmoking68 (56.7)
Alcohol43 (35.8)
Fresh fruits/vegetables20 (16.7)
Fermented fish/meat75 (62.5)
Types of gastrectomy specimensPartial77 (64.2)
Total35 (29.2)
Subtotal6 (5.0)
Total gastrectomy with splenectomy2 (1.6)
Sites of stomach involvedAntral-pyloric17 (14.2)
Antrum56 (46.6)
Pylorus17 (14.2)
Body24 (20.0)
Cardia3 (2.5)
Fundus3 (2.5)
Gross features (Borrmann classification) [10]Polypoid (Type 1)57 (47.4)
Ulcerative (Type 2)41 (34.2)
Infiltrative ulcerative (Type 3)11 (9.2)
Diffuse infiltrative (Type 4)11 (9.2)
WHO classification of Adenocarcinoma (2019) [10]Tubular (solid)-poorly differentiated50 (41.6)
Tubular-moderately differentiated34 (28.3)
Tubular-well differentiated12 (10.0)
Mucinous12 (10.0)
Papillary8 (6.7)
Signet ring cell type4 (3.4)

Gross features or the macroscopic appearances of the gastric cancer were subclassified using Borrmann classification [10] which includes four types. Polypoid (57 cases, 47.4%) was the most common gross feature followed by ulcerative (41 cases, 34.2%) [Table/Fig-2,3a]. Rest of them were infiltrative ulcerative and diffuse infiltrative. According to the WHO classification (2019) of gastric tumour [10], we have categorised adenocarcinoma [Table/Fig-2]. Tubular-poorly differentiated (50 cases, 41.6%) [Table/Fig-3b,c] comprises the majority of the cases followed by tubular-moderately differentiated (34 cases, 28.3%) [Table/Fig-3d]. Tubular-well differentiated, mucinous adenocarcinoma [Table/Fig-4a], papillary adenocarcinoma [Table/Fig-4b] were also diagnosed. Signet ring cell type [Table/Fig-4c,d] was the least common type.

Gross specimen of stomach: (a) Showing ulcerative type of growth. Case of tubular-poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; b) Section shows solid pattern of growth and poorly formed glands (x100, H&E); c) Section shows pleomorphic hyperchromatic cells with vesicular chromatin and prominent nucleoli (x400, H&E). Case of tubular-moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; d) Section shows gland formation lined by pleomorphic hyperchromatic cells (x100, H&E).

Case of mucinous adenocarcinoma: a) Section shows malignant cells floating in pools of mucin (x100, H&E). Case of papillary adenocarcinoma; b) Section shows papillae formation with fibrovascular connective tissue core (x100, H&E). Case of signet ring cell type adenocarcinoma; c) Section shows poorly cohesive signet ring type of cells (x100, H&E); d) Section shows signet ring cells with eccentric nucleus and pools of mucin (x400, H&E).

TNM staging was done. T3 stage (70 cases, 58.3%) comprised the major bulk of the cases followed by T2 (32 cases, 26.7%), T4 (10 cases, 8.3%) and T1 (8 cases, 6.7%). Likewise, N2 nodal staging (72 cases, 60%) was leading followed by N0 (34 cases, 28.4%), N1 (10 cases, 8.3%) and N3 (4 cases, 3.3%). Distal metastasis consisting 43.3% (52 cases) of the cases with liver (25 cases, 48.1%) as the most common site of metastasis followed by PD (22 cases, 42.3%), left supraclavicular lymph node (3 cases, 5.8%), and multiple metastasis (2 cases, 3.8%). Majority of the cases were stage IIIA (59 cases, 49.2%) and stage IV (52 cases, 43.3%) [Table/Fig-5].

Frequency of overall staging.

StageNumber of cases (%)
IA1 (0.8)
IB1 (0.8)
IIA2 (1.6)
IIB1 (0.8)
IIIA59 (49.2)
IIIB3 (2.7)
IIIC1 (0.8)
IV52 (43.3)

For PD, CA125 cut-off value ≥35 U/mL was used as a reference value [7]. CA125 had a very high odds ratio of 27 to assess peritoneal involvement. There was a significant correlation (p-value <0.0001) with PD and CA125 serum assay [Table/Fig-6]. The Chi-square test was 41.9 and degree of freedom as 1. The statistical values are shown in [Table/Fig-7].

Diagnostic ability of CA 125 serum marker.

CA 125 (U/mL) Serum assayPeritoneal Dissemination (PD)Odds ratio95% CI*p-value
PresentAbsent
≥35 U/mL1814277.95-91.66<0.0001
<35 U/mL484

*95% CI: 95% Confidence interval, Chi-square value was 41.9; CA 125: Cancer antigen 125 p-value <0.05 to be considered significant


Statistical evaluation.

StatisticValue95% CI*
Sensitivity81.8%59.72-94.81
Specificity85.7%77.19-91.96
PPV56.2%43.24-68.46
NPV95.4%89.61-98.08
Accuracy85.0%77.33-90.86

*95% CI: 95% confidence interval; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value


Discussion

Gastric cancer is one of the most commonly observed malignant tumors. Incidence and the patterns of gastric cancer show a worldwide variation. High incidence is seen in countries of Southeast Asia, Japan and China as compared to India [11]. Among 120 cases, the mean age of presentation was 54.3 years with male to female ratio of 2.3:1. This was quite similar to the other studies [Table/Fig-8]. Majority of the patients complained of anorexia (68%) followed by dyspepsia (50%), pallor (50%) and hematemesis (43%). These clinical findings were comparable to the other studies [2,12-14]. Family history was present only in 2 cases. This estimate was low due to inadequate history given by the patients. Consumption of fermented fish/red meat was 62.5% followed by smoking (56.7%). This was coherent with other studies [2,14]. As per RUT results, history of preceding H. pylori infection was seen in 11.6% of cases. Nandi A et al., RUT results showed 24.1% positivity [12].

Age and sex incidences, most common site affected and TNM stage compared to other studies [2,12-14].

Name of the studyMean age (years)Male:Female ratioMost common site affectedTNM staging
Barad AK et al., [2]58.22.2:1AntrumIV
Nandi A et al., [12]53.022.4:1AntrumIII
Shirin L and Rahman MM [13]52.893:1PyloricIV
Safaee A et al., [14]59.72.5: 1PyloricIV
Present study54.32.3:1AntrumIII

The most common site affected was antrum (46.6%). This was compared to other studies [Table/Fig-8]. Polypoid (Borrmann type 1) (47.4%) was the most common gross feature so as in the study done by Nandi A et al., [12]. The maximum palliative surgery was partial gastrectomy. Similar findings were seen with other studies [12,14,15]. Among the adenocarcinoma, the most common type was tubular (solid)-poorly differentiated. This was consistent with other studies [2,12-14]. According to the TNM staging, stage III (49.2%) was among the majority followed by stage IV (43.3%) as compared to the other studies [Table/Fig-8].

Gastric carcinomas are a biologically and genetically heterogenous group of tumours with multifactorial aetiologies. It occurs mostly in persons aged 30 years or more and incidence increases progressively with age in both men and women [16]. The common aetiology is smoking, dietary factors such as high intake of smoked meat, salt preserved food and low intake of fresh fruit and vegetables, H. pylori infection [17]. Histological types of adenocarcinoma are subclassified into different categories as tubular composed of slit-like and branching tubules, papillary has elongated finger-like supported by fibrovascular connective tissue cores, mucinous composed of extracellular mucin pools (>50%), signet ring cell type characterised by cytoplasmic mucin with an eccentrically placed nucleus and mixed is composed of glandular and signet ring/poorly cohesive cellular components. CK7, CK20, MUC6, CDX2 are specific for primary gastric adenocarcinomas [18].

The prognosis for advanced gastric cancer especially with PD is poor and the quality of life is also compromised. So, early diagnosis of the degree and extent of PD is essential. Nowadays, USG/CT is used to assess the PD. The specificity is high but the sensitivity is low and with a drawback in finding the nodules less than 5 mm [19]. Laparoscopic examination is well-precise but it is an invasive procedure. Nonetheless, current serum tumour markers can be easily and cost-effectively identified and can be useful for the preoperative staging of neoplasms, postoperative monitoring of treatment and early diagnosis of recurrence.

Tumour marker is selectively secreted by cancer cells alone, in the blood or in other body fluids. CA125 is a repeating peptide epitope of the mucin MUC16 and is identified as a 5797-base pair cDNA isolated from the OVCAR-3 cDNA library [20]. Promoting cancer cell proliferation and inhibiting anticancer immune responses are its biological function. CA125 is formerly found as a distinctive biological marker for ovarian cancer and is considered to be a method for detection of gastric cancer [21]. CA125 is also related to ovarian, uterine, lung and pancreatic cancers [22]. Some studies have shown that Systemic Inflammatory Response (SIR) and fibrinogen also plays an important role in tumour progression and metastasis in advanced gastric cancer [23-25].

For PD, CA125 cut-off value ≥35 U/mL was used as a reference value. The sensitivity and specificity of CA125 was compared with other studies [Table/Fig-9] [13,26-29]. Emoto S et al., showed sensitivity of 46% [30]. CA 125 had the highest odds ratio 27(95% CI: 7.95-91.66) for predicting PD. Similarly, to Shirin L and Rahman MM (18.3, 95% CI: 4.39-76.64) [13], Hwang GI et al., (24.46, 95% CI: 11.17-53.37) [28] and Nakata B et al., (14.56, CI: 3.23-65.5) [7]. The PPV and NPV were 56.2% and 95.4%. This was comparable with the studies done by Shirin L and Rahman MM (PPV: 65%, NPV: 91%) [13] and Chen C et al., (PPV: 83.3%, NPV: 62.6%) [26]. Most gastric cancer are asymptomatic and so most cases present at late stage. Peritoneal metastasis is one such event and in such cases, a gastrectomy does not improve the prognosis but can rather hamper the patient’s quality of life. Hence, the need of a diagnostic tool which could correctly predict peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is important.

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of CA125 with other studies [13,26-29].

Name of the study (year of study)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Shirin L and Rahman MM (2016) [13]7386
Chen C et al., (2017) [26]28.799
Haung C et al., (2019) [27]79.184.9
Hwang GI et al., (2004) [28]38.698.4
Fujimura T et al., (2002) [29]55100
Present study81.885.7

CA125: Cancer antigen 125


Limitation(s)

Firstly, the assessment of postoperative level of serum CA125 for recurrence patterns of gastric cancer was not done. Secondly, small sample size for shorter period of time and thirdly, only one serum marker CA125 was evaluated as the other serum markers like CA 72-4, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 were not routinely tested for gastric carcinoma patients in our hospital.

Conclusion(s)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and remains to be an important malignant disease with significant geographical, ethnic and socio-economic difference in distribution. Majority of malignant gastric neoplasms are asymptomatic and hence, presents in late stage. Early detection of peritoneal disease will help the clinicians to stratify the treatment of gastric cancers and to decide whether to go for surgical or palliative intervention. Higher sensitivity suggests that preoperative serum CA125 is a promising tool to predict PD which aids in subsequent alternative mode of treatment, lesser morbidity and better survival of patients.

*95% CI: 95% Confidence interval, Chi-square value was 41.9; CA 125: Cancer antigen 125 p-value <0.05 to be considered significant*95% CI: 95% confidence interval; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive valueCA125: Cancer antigen 125

References

[1]Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 2018 68(6):394-424.10.3322/caac.2149230207593  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Barad AK, Mandal SK, Harsha HS, Sharma BM, Singh TS, Gastric cancer-a clinicopathological studying a tertiary care centre of North-eastern India J Gastrointest Oncol 2014 5(2):142-47.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, Gastric cancer, version 3.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016 14(10):1286-312.10.6004/jnccn.2016.013727697982  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Leake PA, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R, Lourenco L, Helyer L, Mahar A, A systematic review of the accuracy and indications for diagnostic laparoscopy prior to curative-intent resection of gastric cancer Gastric Cancer 2012 15(Suppl 1):S38-47.10.1007/s10120-011-0047-z21667136  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Duffy MJ, Sturgeon CM, Sölétormos G, Barak V, Molina R, Hayes DF, Validation of new cancer biomarkers: A position statement from the European group on tumour markers Clin Chem 2015 61(6):809-20.10.1373/clinchem.2015.23986325882892  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Bast RC, Feeney M, Lazarus H, Nadler LM, Colvin RB, Knapp RC, Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma J Clin Invest 1981 68(5):1331-37.10.1172/JCI1103807028788  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Nakata B, Chung KH, Kato Y, Yamashita Y, Maeda K, Onoda N, Serum CA 125 Level as a Predictor of Peritoneal Dissemination in Patients with Gastric Carcinoma Cancer 1998 83(12):2488-92.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12<2488::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Kim DH, Yun HY, Ryu DH, Han SH, Han JH, Yoon SM, Preoperative CA125 is significant indicator of curative resection in gastric cancer patients World J Gastroenterol 2015 21(4):1216-21.10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.121625632195  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Feng F, Tian Y, Xu G, Liu Z, Liu S, Zheng G, Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer BMC Cancer 2017 17:73710.1186/s12885-017-3738-y29121872  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Bing Hu, Nassim El Hajj, Scott Sittler, Nancy Lammert, Robert Barnes, Aurelia Meloni-Ehrig, Gastric cancer: Classification, histology and application of molecular pathology J Gastrointest Oncol 2012 3(3):251-61.doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.021  [Google Scholar]

[11]Satyanarayana L, Asthana S, Life time risk for development of ten major cancers in India and its trends over the years 1982 to 2000 Indian J Med Sci 2008 62(2):35-44.10.4103/0019-5359.3936518319530  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Nandi A, Biswas PK, Kar M, Sinha SK, Clinicopathological profile of gastric cancer in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India: A prospective 2-year study Clin Cancer Investig 2014 3(1):14-20.10.4103/2278-0513.125786  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Shirin L, Rahman MM, Clinical significance of CA125 level with clinicopathological variables and peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastric carcinoma Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access 2016 4(2):0009010.15406/ghoa.2016.04.00090  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Safaee A, Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Fatemi SR, Ghiasi S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Zali MR, Clinicopathological Features of Gastric Cancer: A Study Based on Cancer Registry Data Iranian Journal of Cancer 2009 2(2):67-70.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Kim DY, Ryu SY, Kim YJ, Kim SK, Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma in young patients Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003 388(4):245-49.10.1007/s00423-003-0387-112861416  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Sitarz R, Skierucha M, Mielko J, Offerhaus GJ, Maciejewski R, Polkowski WP, Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment Cancer Manag Res 2018 10:239-48.10.2147/CMAR.S14961929445300  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Hirohata T, Kono S, Diet/nutrition and stomach cancer in Japan Int J Cancer 1997 S10(71):34-36.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(1997)10+<34::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-A  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[18]O’Connell FP, Wang HH, Odze RD, Utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing primary adenocarcinomas from metastatic breast carcinomas in the gastrointestinal tract Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005 129(3):338-47.10.5858/2005-129-338-UOIIDP15737028  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Kim SJ, Kim H-H, Kim YH, Hwang SH, Lee HS, Park DJ, Peritoneal metastasis: detection with 16-or 64-detector row CT in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer Radiology 2009 253(2):407-15.10.1148/radiol.253208227219789243  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Yin BW, Lloyd KO, Molecular cloning of the CA125 ovarian cancer antigen: Identification as a new mucin, MUC16 J Biol Chem 2001 276(29):27371-75.10.1074/jbc.M10355420011369781  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Wang Z, Tian YP, Clinical value of serum tumour markers CA19-9, CA125 and CA72-4 in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma Mol Clin Oncol 2014 2(2):265-68.10.3892/mco.2013.22624649344  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Cragun JM, Screening for ovarian cancer Cancer Control 2011 18(1):16-21.10.1177/10732748110180010321273976  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F, Cancer-related inflammation Nature 2008 454(7203):436-44.10.1038/nature0720518650914  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Perisanidis C, Psyrri A, Cohen E, Engelmann J, Heinze G, Perisanidis B, Prognostic role of pretreatment plasma fibrinogen in patients with solid tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer Treat Rev 2015 41(10):P960-70.10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.00226604093  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Cumulative prognostic scores based on plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin levels in esophageal cancer patients treated with transthoracic esophagectomy: Comparison with the Glasgow prognostic score Ann Surg Oncol 2015 22(1):302-10.10.1245/s10434-014-3857-524952029  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Chen C, Chen Q, Zhao Q, Liu M, Guo J, Value of combined detection of serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, CA15-3 and CA12-5 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 2017 47(3):260-63.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Huang C, Liu Z, Xiao L, Xia Y, Huang J, Luo H, Clinical significance of serum CA125, CA19-9, CA72-4, and fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination Front Oncol 2019 9:115910.3389/fonc.2019.0115931750248  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Hwang GI, Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Shin JH, Park YL, Dai Kim H, Predictive value of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels for peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma Cancer Res Treat 2004 36(3):178-81.10.4143/crt.2004.36.3.17820396541  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Fujimura T, Kinami S, Ninomiya I, Kitagawa H, Fushida S, Nishimura G, Diagnostic laparoscopy, serum CA125, and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer Endoscopy 2002 34(7):569-74.10.1055/s-2002-3322812170412  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Emoto S, Ishigami H, Yamashita H, Yamaguchi H, Kaisaki S, Kitayama J, Clinical significance of CA125 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination Gastric Cancer 2012 15(2):154-61.10.1007/s10120-011-0091-821892754  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]