JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Biochemistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45002.14155
Year : 2020 | Month : Oct | Volume : 14 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : BC24 - BC27

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Disease in Metabolic Syndrome Patients

Shahid Iqbal1, Anju Mittal2, Sudeep Kumar3, Sumesh Prasad Sah4, Imran Mustafa5, Manju Sharma6

1 Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4 Demonstrator, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
5 Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
6 Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Anju Mittal, Department of Biochemistry, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: anju21mittal@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a condition that increases the risk of cardiac disease, diabetes, hypertension and may be associated with microalbuminuria.

Aim

To investigate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and to determine albumin to creatinine ratio as a predictor of cardiovascular disease in metabolic syndrome.

Materials and Methods

This was a hospital based cross-divtional study conducted from February 2019 to January 2020 in the Department of Biochemistry and Outpatient Department of Muzaffarnagar Medical College, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. Out of enrolled 795 subjects, 452 were male and 343 were female. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was calculated on the basis of metabolic syndrome criteria. Anthropometric parameters like age, weight, height, blood pressure and the biochemical parameters including fasting blood sugar, triglyceride, Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP), urinary albumin, serum creatinine and urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio were measured in study population. SPSS version 16 was used for statistical analysis and student independent sample t-test was used for comparing differences amongst the variables. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Out of 795 subjects, 152 patients (19.12%) were hypertensive, 85 patients (10.69%) were diabetic and 29 patients (3.65%) were hypertensive with diabetic. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was around 18.11% (144 subjects), out of which 52.78% were female and 47.22% were male. Out of 144 Metabolic Syndrome subjects, 23 subjects were diabetic, 32 were hypertensive, 14 were diabetic with hypertensive and 75 were others. The mean levels of urinary albumin creatinine ratio were increased significantly in metabolic syndrome subjects and the increase in urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (uACR) was more in metabolic syndrome subjects having Diabetes and Hypertension both.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that the microalbuminuria is associated with metabolic syndrome. The microalbuminuria was found to be more significant in metabolic syndrome subjects who were diabetic with hypertensive as compared to diabetic or hypertensive alone.

Keywords

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome reflects metabolic and vessel risk factor viz., hormone resistance, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, central avoirdupois, pre-diabetes or polygenic disease, hyperinsulinaemia and dyslipidemia [1]. Sedentary lifestyle, sugar sweetened beverage consumption and increased portion sizes all may lead to obesity. Rising rates of electronic device use and time spent watching television may be correlated with increased risk of obesity [2]. There are various definitions and criteria of metabolic syndrome [3-6] and it is agreed that a combination of three or more components, waist circumference, elevated triglycerides, low HDL-c, raised blood pressure and elevated fasting blood glucose must be present. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) proposed a new definition of metabolic syndrome in April 2006 [6].

The Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (ACR) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and other health outcomes. Urinary albumin excretion has been associated with accrued Insulin Resistance (IR) [7], hypertension, vascular inflammation, blood vessels stiffness [8], nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular events, and mortality, throughout the biological range, even at levels traditionally considered normal (<30 mg/gm) [9].

According to the initial data from a observational study [10], the ACR may have some role in predicting a future risk of diabetes and also on the observed benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reducing the development to diabetes because of antiproteinuria effects [11]. However, Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) did not prove that microalbuminuria is an independent predictor of future risk of diabetes according to the follow-up information [12]. Microalbuminuria independently associated with metabolic syndrome, however studies on the association between microalbuminuria and different components of metabolic syndrome, to some extent, are conflicting. Hence, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and to determine the ACR as a marker of cardiovascular disease in metabolic syndrome.

Materials and Methods

This hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry and Outpatient Department of Muzaffarnagar Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarnagar from February 2019 to January 2020. Permission from the Ethical Committee (MMC/PO/2019/54) and informed consent were taken from every subject prior to the study. The sample size was calculated by using the prevalence rate of Metabolic Syndrome in Western UP (11.17%) [13].

Inclusion criteria: The patients were selected on the basis of metabolic syndrome criteria proposed by IDF 2006 [14] within the age group of 20 to 65 years. Subjects taking anti-hypertensive drugs or hypoglycaemic drugs were considered to have high BP or a high fasting glucose level, respectively. The cut-off value for fasting blood glucose was >120 mg/dL and for systolic blood pressure was 146 mm of Hg and diastolic blood pressure was 92 mm of Hg in patients taking hypoglycaemic and anti-hypertensive drugs, respectively.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with acute and chronic nephritis, severe uncontrolled hypertension, congestive cardiac failure, chronic cigarette smokers, chronic alcoholism, pregnancy, fever, severe exercise, psychological stress and any other chronic disease were excluded from the study.

Weight was measured in Kilogram by an electronic weighing machine (Commercial scale). Height was recorded in centimeter using a height scale. Abdominal girth was measured using a measuring tape and was recorded in centimeter. The level of measurement was midway between lower costal margin and iliac crest which approximately correspond to mid umbilicus level. The tape was held in parallel to the floor and without compression of the skin at normal expiration.

Blood Pressure

The measurement of blood pressure was taken in sitting posture after resting for minimum of 10-15 minutes. Three consecutive reading were recorded at an interval 2-5 minutes on the same day or in subsequent OPDs before final conclusion of high blood pressure.

Blood Sample Collection

The individuals were requested for overnight fast. Blood was taken from anticubital vein in a single disposable syringe. Sample was centrifuged and serum was separated. Fasting plasma glucose level and lipid parameters were done by enzymatic method by using automated analyser.

Urine Sample Collection and Processing

For the screening of urinary albumin and urinary creatinine concentration, first morning void (timed) Quantitative midstream urine sample was taken. Urinary Albumin (BCG method) and Creatinine (Jaffe’s method) were estimated by using automated analyser (CPC Turbo Chem 100).

Urine Albumin Creatinine ratio (uACR)=Urinary Albumin (mg/dL)/Urinary Creatinine (gm/dL).

Statistical Analysis

SPSS version-16 was used for Statistical analysis. Student’s independent sample t-test was used to determined the statistical differences between the groups and p-value less then 0.05 considered as statistically significant.

Results

[Table/Fig-1] showed the general characteristics of total study population as well as metabolic syndrome subjects. The present study included 795 subjects out of which 452 were male and 343 were female. Out of the 795 subjects, 152 (19.12%) subjects were hypertensive, 85 (10.69%) were Diabetic and 29 subjects (3.65%) were Diabetic with hypertension and others 529 (66.54%). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was found to be 18.11% (144 subjects, 76 were female and 68 were male). Out of 144 metabolic syndrome subjects, 23 were diabetic (15.97%), 32 were Hypertensive (22.22%), 14 were hypertensive with diabetic (9.72%) and 75 subjects were others (52.09%).

General characteristics of total study population and metabolic syndrome subjects.

Total study subjects (N=795; M/F=452/343)Metabolic syndrome (n=144 (18.11%); M/F=68/76
HypertensionDiabetesDiabetes with hypertensionOther*HypertensionDiabetesDiabetes with hypertensionOther**
152 (19.12%)85 (10.69%)29 (3.65%)529 (66.54%)32 (22.22%)23 (15.97%)14 (9.72%)75 (52.09%)

*They may be pre-diabetes, pre-hypertensive, obese or healthy individual

**They are metabolic syndrome obese subjects and might be pre-diabetic or pre-hypertensive


[Table/Fig-2] showed the mean level of anthropometric and other biochemical parameters in general population. The mean levels of fasting blood glucose, waist circumference, BMI, waist-to-height ratio and triglyceride were found to be increased significantly in male subjects as compared to female subjects while the mean levels of diastolic and systolic blood pressure were found to be increased insignificantly in male as compared to female subjects. In the present study, significantly decreased level of HDL-c was found in female subjects as compared to males whereas LAP was found to be significantly increased in female subjects as compared to male subjects.

Represents demographic and biochemical parameters in study subjects.

S. No.VariablesMale (452)Female (343)p-value
1WC (cm)85.67±6.1695.96±7.37<0.001
2WC to Height (WHt) ratio (%)0.55±0.050.57±0.51<0.001
3BMI (Kg/m2)26.61±3.3824.28±3.24<0.001
4SBP (mm of Hg)121±8.29122.34±8.440.02
5DBP (mm of Hg)79.41±8.9880.70±10.43>0.05
6HDL-c (mg/dL)49.04±9.5945.31±8.04<0.001
7TG (mmol/L)1.62±0.321.55±0.370.006
8FBS (mg/dL)83.91±15.2993.20±37.48<0.001
9Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP)46.0±16.9750.31±20.9<0.001
10Urine albumin (mg/dL)52.76±60.0858.66±66.410.19
11Urine creatinine (gm/dL)1.47±0.941.56±1.010.19
12uACR (mg/gm)30.04±12.1731.06±13.890.27

WC: Waist circumference, BMI: Body mass index, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure, HDL-c: High density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG: Triglycerides, FBS: Fasting blood sugar, uACR-: urine Albumin to creatinine ratio.


[Table/Fig-3] represented the mean value of demographic and biochemical parameters in metabolic syndrome in both male and female subjects. Significant increase was found in Waist Circumference, waist to height ratio, fasting blood sugar and LAPs in male subjects as compared to female subjects.

Shows biochemical and demographical parameters in metabolic syndrome.

S. No.ParametersMale (68)Female (76)p-value
1WC (cm)104.48±4.7994.61±4.890.001
2WC to height (WHt) ratio (%)0.062±0.0270.58±0.0340.001
3BMI (Kg/m2)27.22±3.0627.86±3.370.24
4SBP (mm of Hg)130.16±8.77128.8±7.600.32
5DBP (mm of Hg)84.61±6.2383.08±4.830.10
6HDL-c (mg/dL)41.52±6.9341.93±7.570.73
7TG (mmol/L)1.29±0.281.90±0.250.60
8FBS (mg/dL)126.96±72.27100.01±21.720.0025
9Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP)77.15±16.8370.27±15.620.01
10Urine albumin (mg/dL)183.74±47.98181.63±40.360.77
11Urine creatinine (gm/dL)3.53±0.413.52±0.420.94
12uACR (mg/gm)52.86±15.7352.18±12.810.77

WC: Waist circumference, BMI: Body mass index, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure, HDL-c: High density lipoprotein, TG: Triglycerides, FBS: Fasting blood sugar


[Table/Fig-4] represented the mean value of uACR, urine creatinine and Urine albumin in Diabetic, Hypertensive, diabetic with hypertensive and other subjects who are MetS subjects. The increases in above parameters were more in subjects who were diabetic with hypertensive as compared to hypertensive or diabetic alone.

Shows the values of uACR, Urine Albumin and Creatinine in different group of metabolic subjects.

VariablesMetabolic syndrome (144)
Others (75)HTN (32)DM (23)DM with HTN (14)
Urine albumin (mg/dL)Mean173.55180.31190.56283.77
SD24.0712.6913.9256.90
p-value-0.140.001<0.0001
Urine creatinine (gm/dL)Mean3.403.443.583.96
SD0.490.420.640.63
p-value-0.690.160003
uACR (mg/gm)Mean52.6153.2554.1373.02
SD11.238.708.6516.41
p-value-0.770.55<0.0001

S=statistically significant, NS=statistically nonsignificant when metabolic syndrome subjects having DM (Diabetes Mellitus), HTN (Hypertension), DM and HTN with both compared with group no having DM as well as HTN


Discussion

Microalbuminuria predicts increase in cardiovascular diseases and diabetic nephropathy [15] which are the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Metabolic syndrome is found to be highly prevalent worldwide, especially in affluent countries [16]. In the present study, the mean value of LAP in total study population was more in female subjects as compared to male subjects and it was statistically significant, while the mean value of LAP in male metabolic syndrome subject was more as compared to female metabolic syndrome subjects and it was statistically significant. LAP is a simple and better clinical indicator for the prediction of metabolic syndrome as compared to waist to height ratio and BMI [17].

In the present study, out of total studied subjects 10.69% were diabetic, 19.12% were hypertensive and 3.65% subjects were diabetic with hypertension. As per IDF guideline, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was around 18.11% (8.55% were in males and 9.55% in female) and 15.97% metabolic subjects having diabetes, 22.22% having HTN and 9.72% metabolic syndrome subjects having diabetic as well HTN both. In the present study, many of the metabolic syndrome subjects were not having diabetes as well as hypertension but they were obese and may be pre-hypertensive and pre-diabetic and they were not further categorised. A researcher in their study found the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was around 19.18% and in their study, the number of female metabolic syndrome subjects were more and they concluded that female were more prone to develop metabolic syndrome as compared to male subjects [17].

In the present study, the uACR magnitude was found to be increased in metabolic syndrome. This magnitude was more elevated in metabolic subjects having DM with HTN, DM or HTN alone, respectively. The results suggested that uACR may have a significant role in predicting the metabolic syndrome subjects due to their pronicity to CVD and the severity was more in patient of DM with HTN as compared to DM or HTN alone. The level of uACR was increased in patients with metabolic syndrome, may be for the reason that earlier management for MetS should be started to prevent the progression of chronic kidney disease and other cardiovascular disease. Many researchers in their studies showed positive association between urinary albumin and increased cardiovascular risk [18,19].

Hypertension can speed up the diabetic nephropathy and can cause microalbuminuria [20]. It is also being considered as an independent risk factor for diabetic neuropathy [21]. Microalbuminuria is used to predict renal disease in patients with high risk of progression to renal failure [15]. It is no surprise that low creatinine clearance was shown to have a significant association with microalbuminuria.

The kidneys filter wastes and extra fluids from blood, and they use a lot of blood vessels for this. The nephrons do not receive the required oxygen and nutrients because of the damage of blood vessels. Raised blood pressure may narrow the arteries around the kidneys and weaken or harden them. Due to this, kidneys lose their ability to filter blood because arteries unable to deliver enough blood to the kidney tissue and the nephrons do not receive the oxygen and nutrients. There are multiple risk factors for microalbuminuria and studies have shown poor glycaemic control and increased duration of diabetes, and increased creatinine as important risk factors [22].

Metabolic syndrome causes endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, increased leakage of macromolecules and these are further aggravated by Diabetes and Hypertension in metabolic syndrome. Endothelial dysfunction may precede microalbuminuria. Endothelial glycocalyx forms a barrier to protein permeability in both systemic and glomerular capillaries. The presence of microalbuminuria implies dysfunction of the glomerular filtration barrier. This study showed that microalbuminuria is common condition in metabolic syndrome and was found much more in subjects having diabetes and hypertension [23].

A researcher wrote an article on microalbuminuria, cardiovascular disease and hypertension and concluded that low grade microalbuminuria is associated with CVD [24]. Metabolic syndrome and microalbuminuria, both have been associated to CVD [25]. Both metabolic syndrome and microalbuminuria may cause small vessel disorders through endothelial dysfunction that makes an individual susceptible to organ damage [26]. Excessive fat accumulation and changes in the synthesis and secretion of adipokines might be the causative factor for the development of type 2 diabetes, hypertension and CVD [27].

Limitation(s)

The study had small population size so a study with large sample should be conducted to verify the results of the present study.

Conclusion(s)

In conclusion, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was around 18.11% and in this study, the dominancy of female was noted in metabolic syndrome. The present study revealed a strong relationship between microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk in metabolic syndrome, diabetes and hypertension. Hence, the management in early stage of metabolic syndrome may include estimation of uACR in all patients to prevent cardiovascular disease.

*They may be pre-diabetes, pre-hypertensive, obese or healthy individual**They are metabolic syndrome obese subjects and might be pre-diabetic or pre-hypertensiveWC: Waist circumference, BMI: Body mass index, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure, HDL-c: High density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG: Triglycerides, FBS: Fasting blood sugar, uACR-: urine Albumin to creatinine ratio.WC: Waist circumference, BMI: Body mass index, SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure, HDL-c: High density lipoprotein, TG: Triglycerides, FBS: Fasting blood sugarS=statistically significant, NS=statistically nonsignificant when metabolic syndrome subjects having DM (Diabetes Mellitus), HTN (Hypertension), DM and HTN with both compared with group no having DM as well as HTN

References

[1]Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D, Karnieli E, The metabolic syndrome from insulin resistance to obesity and diabetes Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2008 37(3):559-79.10.1016/j.ecl.2008.05.00218775352  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Cespedes EM, Gillman MW, Kleinman K, Rifas-Shiman SL, Redline S, Taveras EM, Television viewing, bedroom television, and sleep duration from infancy to mid-childhood Pediatrics 2014 133(5):e1163-71.10.1542/peds.2013-399824733878  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Circulation 2009 120(16):1640-45.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.19264419805654  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: An american heart association/national heart, lung, and blood institute scientific statement Circulation 2005 112(17):2735-52.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.16940416157765  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J, for the IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus GroupThe metabolic syndrome-A new worldwide definition Lancet 2005 366(9491):1059-62.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]Huang PL, A comprehensive definition for metabolic syndrome Dis Model Mech 2009 2(5-6):231-37.10.1242/dmm.00118019407331  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Parvanova AI, Trevisan R, Iliev IP, Dimitrov BD, Vedovato M, Tiengo A, Insulin resistance and microalbuminuria: A cross-sectional, case control study of 158 patients with type 2 diabetes and different degrees of urinary albumin excretion Diabetes 2006 55(5):1456-62.10.2337/db05-148416644705  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Shin DI, Seung KB, Yoon HE, Hwang BH, Seo SM, Shin SJ, Microalbuminuria is independently associated with arterial stiffness and vascular inflammation but not with carotid intima-media thickness in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes or essential hypertension J Korean Med Sci 2013 28(2):252-60.10.3346/jkms.2013.28.2.25223400641  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Brantsma AH, Bakker SJ, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE, Gansevoort RT, Urinary albumin excretion as a predictor of the development of hypertension in the general population J Am Soc Nephrol 2006 17(2):331-35.10.1681/ASN.200511115316434504  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Brantsma AH, Bakker SJ, Hillege HL, De Zeeuw D, De Jonq PE, Gansevoort RT, Urinary albumin excretion and its relation with C-reactive protein and the metabolic syndrome in the prediction of type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2005 28(10):2525-30.10.2337/diacare.28.10.252516186291  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G, Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators N Engl J Med 2000 342(3):145-53.10.1056/NEJM20000120342030110639539  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Friedman AN, Marrero D, Ma Y, Ackermann R, Venka T, Narayan KM, Barrett Connor E, Value of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio as a predictor of type 2 diabetes in prediabetic individuals Diabetes Care 2008 31(12):2344-48.10.2337/dc08-014818796622  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Zafar KS, Pious T, Singh PS, Gautam RK, Yadav SK, Singh P, Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a rural population- A cross sectional study from Western Uttar Pradesh, India Int J Res Med Sci 2017 5(5):2223-28.10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20171873  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]The IDF consensus: Worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. 2006. 01-07  [Google Scholar]

[15]Maahs DM, Snively BM, Bell RA, Dolan L, Hirsch I, Imperatore G, Higher prevalence of elevated albumin excretion in youth with type 2 than type 1 diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study Diabetes Care 2007 30(10):2593-98.10.2337/dc07-045017630264  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Ford ES, Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the international diabetes federation among adults in the U.S Diabetes Care 2005 28(11):2745-49.10.2337/diacare.28.11.274516249550  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Mittal A, Kumar S, Arora M, Mahat RK, Batra J, Lipid accumulation products: A better marker for prediction of metabolic syndrome Int J Clin Biochem Res 2019 6(2):243-46.10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.054  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[18]Klausen K, Borch-Johnsen K, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Jensen G, Clausen P, Scharling H, Very low levels of microalbuminuria are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and death independently of renal function, hypertension, and diabetes Circulation 2004 110(1):32-35.10.1161/01.CIR.0000133312.96477.4815210602  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Zeeuw DD, Parving HH, Henning RH, Microalbuminuria as an early marker for cardiovascular disease J Am Soc Nephrol 2006 17(8):2100-05.10.1681/ASN.200605051716825327  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Afkhami-Ardekani M, Modarnesi M, Amirichaghmaghi E, Prevalence of microalbuminuria and its risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients Indian J Nephrol 2008 18(3):112-17.10.4103/0971-4065.4369020142916  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Kubba S, Agarwal SK, Prakash A, Puri V, Babbar R, Anuradha S, Effect of losartan on albuminuria, peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in normotensive microalbuminuric type 2 diabetics Neurol India 2003 51(3):355-58.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Ansar MM, ShahrokhiRad R, Lebady MK, Risk factors of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients in north of Iran- Rasht Nephro-Urol Mon 2017 9(1):e4003110.5812/numonthly.40031  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[23]Satchell SC, Tooke JE, What is the mechanism of microalbuminuria in diabetes: A role for the glomerular endothelium? Diabetologia 2008 51(5):714-25.10.1007/s00125-008-0961-818347777  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Pollak J, Sypniewska G, Microalbuminuria and risk of cardio vascular diseases in patients with diabetes and hypertension Biochemia Medica 2008 18(1):25-34.10.11613/BM.2008.004  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[25]Lin CC, Liu CS, Li TC, Chen CC, Li CI, Lin WY, Microalbuminuria and the metabolic syndrome and its components in the Chinese population Eur J Clin Invest 2007 37(10):783-90.10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01865.x17888089  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Czernichow S, Greenfield JR, Galan P, Jellouli F, Safar ME, Blacher J, Macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction in the metabolic syndrome Hypertens Res 2010 33(4):293-97.10.1038/hr.2009.22820075933  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Goralski KB, Sinal CJ, Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Getting to the fat of the matter Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2007 85(1):113-32.10.1139/y06-09217487251  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]