JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/44547.13980
Year : 2020 | Month : Sep | Volume : 14 | Issue : 09 Full Version Page : SC01 - SC05

Self-gratification Habits among Children Under Five Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study

Biswajit Biswas1, Mithun Konar2, Archan Sil3, Mousumi Das4, Shibnath Mondal5, Raveesh Kumar6

1 Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
4 Clinical Tutor, Department of Physiotherapy, Burdwan Institute of Medical and Life Sciences, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
5 Senior Resident, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
6 Senior Resident, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Biswajit Biswas, 11/23, Ulhas Mini Township, Ulhas, Burdwan-713104, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: drbiswazeetbiswas@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Self-gratification or masturbation is a normal sexual behaviour; however, masturbation in childhood is less commonly addressed in literature.

Aim

To describe the clinical profile of the children diagnosed with self-gratification condition.

Materials and Methods

This prospective cohort study recruited all cases diagnosed to have the self-gratification condition presenting to the outpatient clinic in the Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India during the period- January 2014 to December 2019. Diagnosis was made from history, home videotapes and sometimes by direct observation of the act during hospital stay. All relevant data pertaining to demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, investigations and treatment were collected in case sheets and were analysed by simple descriptive statistics.

Results

Fifty-four patients were diagnosed to have the condition. Among them, 29 (53.70%) were girls and 25 (46.30%) were boys. The mean age at first symptoms was 20.98±9.31 months (range 3 months to 3 years 4 months). The average age at diagnosis was 26.16±11.35 months (varied from 4 months to 3 years 11 months). The mean frequency of events was 10.31±5.10 times per week, and the mean duration was 9.83±5.98 minutes. Events occurred mostly when children were left alone and bored (n=34, 62.97%). Usual presentations were: rocking in prone position (n=24, 44.44%), intermittent dystonic posturing of the crossed legs (n=23, 42.59%), direct genital manipulation (n=3, 5.56%) and others (n=4, 7.40%)). Two children had been previously misdiagnosed as having definite epilepsy. In 51 cases (94.44%) home videos were available which served as invaluable tools allowing confident diagnosis. Results of urine and stool examination were normal. MRI and EEG performed on two children with suspected epilepsy were reported normal, and antiepileptic drugs were stopped in both. Sixteen children (29.63%) were sent for behavioural therapy and all of them responded well in next one year.

Conclusion

Gratification habits are not uncommon in children and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and other paroxysmal events in early childhood. Home video recording of these actions can be a very influential mean to help in diagnosis and to avoid needless investigations and treatments.

Keywords

Introduction

Self-gratification or masturbation is a normal part of human sexual behaviour. It is said to occur in 90-94% of males and 50-60% of females at some time in their lives [1-4]. However, data on self-gratification behaviours in children under 5 years of age are very limited in literature and they mostly come from case reports and case series [5-13]. Age at onset ranges from 3 months to 5 years, but can occur at any age, even in utero [2,4-6]. Direct genital manipulation is usually absent during gratification spells in children, making the diagnosis difficult at times [2,5]. Usual manifestations of this behaviour include dystonic posture, rocking, friction of thighs, grunting, facial flushing and sweating, and pressure on the perineum [1-6]. Several common features in these children include: no alteration in consciousness, cessation with distraction, normal examination before and after the episode. These apparently bizarre behaviours of the children have often been misdiagnosed as abdominal pain [7,8], epilepsy [3,7,9-11] and paroxysmal dystonia or dyskinesia [12,13]. Several case reports described instances where unnecessary and extensive investigations were performed on such children [7,8]. On many occasions, there had been inappropriate use of medications like anti-epileptic drugs [5,7,10].

This study aims to emphasise that self-gratification or masturbatory habits are quite prevalent among children in our society. Every paediatrician needs to be aware of this, in order to diagnose the condition timely and to prevent unwarranted investigations and inappropriate therapy.

Materials and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted among children presenting to the outpatient clinic in the Department of Paediatric Medicine, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India from January 2014 to December 2019. The study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan (vide memo no. BMC/PG/719). Informed consents were taken from parents, before the beginning of the study. Everyone had the right to withdraw from the study at any time. No added cost was imposed on the families and all information was retained as confidential.

Inclusion criteria: All children 5 years or below who were diagnosed to have the condition during the period mentioned were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Children in whom the diagnosis of epilepsy was confirmed, those with abdominal conditions like Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) or abdominal colic, documented Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), children with genital irritation (diaper rash, pin worms, poor perineal hygiene) were excluded.

Since there is no firm guideline in literature till date regarding how to diagnose gratification behaviours in children, diagnostic criteria were formulated based on evaluation of the consistent clinical findings observed in previous studies [5,13-15]. Children who fulfilled the following two criteria were assumed to have gratification behaviour or masturbating behaviour:

All of them should be present: 1) Typical stereotype with variable duration; 2) No alteration of consciousness during the spells; 3) Cessation with distraction; and 4) Normal appearance and behaviour before and after the spell.

One or more of the following characteristics should be present: 1) Tightening of the adducted thighs in supine (/prone) position with dystonic posturing; 2) Rocking in prone position; 3) Direct manipulation of the genitalia; 4) Rubbing of the perineum against any surface; 5) Facial Flushing and pallor; 6) Grunting noises or other vocalisation; 7) Grimacing; 8) Vacant and staring look; and 9) Fast/irregular breathing.

Diagnosis was made on the basis of careful history taking and watching videoclips meticulously in presence of both the parents. Wherever video-recording of the event was unavailable or was nonconclusive, the child was admitted for 48 hours to directly observe the episode in order to make a correct diagnosis.

A data collecting sheet was developed which included information on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, investigations and modes of treatment. Demographic data included: birth history (birth order, mode of delivery, birth weight, important perinatal events if any), immunisation status, breast feeding practices, major past illness, family structure, education and occupation of parents. Details of gratification spells were noted like- age of onset and diagnosis, frequency, duration, situations when the episodes were observed, behaviours during the spells, physical changes noticed during the episodes and appearance of the child before and after those episodes. Records were kept regarding investigations performed and wherever treatment was required.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical data were initially entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and later they were imported to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. All data were analysed by simple descriptive statistics using SPSS 26.0 software (IBM Corporation, USA).

Results

A total of 54 patients were included in the study. Among them, 29 (53.70%) were girls and 25 (46.30%) were boys [Table/Fig-1].

Demographic data of the population (n=54).

AttributeDescriptionPercentage (%)
GenderBoys: 2546.30
Girls: 2953.70
Age when symptoms were noticed first12 months or younger: 1018.52
More than 12 moths to 3 years: 4175.93
More than 3 years: 35.55
Birth orderFirst born: 2851.85
Second: 2037.04
Third: 611.11
Mode of deliveryNormal vaginal: 3361.11
Cesarean section: 1935.19
Forceps delivery:23.70
Birth weightBoys
More than 2.5 kg: 1629.63
(1.5-2.5) kg: 712.96
Less than 1.5 kg: 23.70
Girls
More than 2.5 kg: 1935.19
(1.5-2.5) kg: 916.67
Less than 1.5 kg: 11.85
Breast feeding practiceExclusively breast fed: 3564.81
Breast feeding + formula: 1935.19
Exclusively formula fed: 000
ImmunisationAll immunised100
Family structureJoint family: 1527.78
Nuclear family: 3666.67
Single parent family: 35.55
Parental educationFather
Primary school: 814.81
High school: 2546.29
College: 1731.49
University: 47.41
Mother
Primary school: 1018.52
High school: 2858.85
College: 1527.78
University: 11.85
Occupation of the parentsFather
School teacher: 1425.92
Other government job: 47.41
Private job: 1324.07
Self-employed: 1833.34
Agriculture: 59.26
Mother
Home-maker: 3259.26
School teacher: 1222.22
Other government job: 23.70
Private job: 814.82

Twenty-eight children (51.85%) in the present study were first born children of their parents. All children in the study group (n=54) were born by institutional delivery. Immunisation status of the study population was 100% as per national immunisation schedule. Twenty-three children (42.59%) received some extra vaccines as per recommendation of Indian Academy of Paediatrics from child care physicians. No major adverse health events in their children were reported by 49 families; three children had history of simple febrile seizure and two had history of neonatal jaundice treated successfully by phototherapy alone [Table/Fig-1].

Thirty-two parents (59.26%) have had come with other medical problems and then, one of the parents declared the concern during conversation. Eighteen parents (33.33%) came directly to seek advice on the peculiar posture/behaviour of their children. Four children (7.41%) were referred to us by local paediatrician for further evaluation. Among these, two children (3.70%) were diagnosed to have seizure disorder, were put on anticonvulsant and patients were not responding. Two patients (3.70%) were referred for further work up of dystonic posturing [Table/Fig-2].

Clinical data of the children with gratification behaviour (n=54).

Clinical dataDescriptionNumber (percentage)
How did the parents come to us?1. Came with other medical problem32 (59.26%)
2. Gratification as main complaint18 (33.33%)
3. Suspected epilepsy (referred to us)2 (3.70%)
4. Dystonia for evaluation (referred to us)2 (3.70%)
Availability of the videoclips1. Available51 (94.44)
2. Not available3 (5.56%)
Modes of diagnosis (done on the basis of)1. Clinical presentation + videoclips49 (90.74%)
2. Hospitalisation and direct observation5 (9.26%)
Age at first symptomsMean-20.98±9.31 months-
Range-3 months to 3 years 4 months-
Age at final diagnosisMean-26.16±11.35 monthsRange-4 months to 3 years 11 months--
Delay between first presentation and final diagnosis of the eventMean-5.3 months-
Range- 1 month to 1 year 1 month-
Frequency of the spellsMean-10.31±5.10 times/week-
Range-3/week to 19/week-
Length of the spellsMean-9.83±5.98 minutes-
Range-3 minutes to 26 minutes-
Usual manifestations of the spells /physical changes1. Rocking in prone position24 (44.44%)
2. Intermittent dystonic posturing of the crossed legs23 (42.59%)
3. Direct manipulation of the genitalia3 (5.56%)
4. Apparent rocking and rubbing of both legs in sitting position2 (3.70%)
5. Grunting noise with excessive sweating in knee-chest position2 (3.70%)
Situations when episodes were observed (some children exhibited these behaviours in more than one situation)1. In bed, lonely and bored34 (62.97%)
2. In any situation11 (20.37%)
3. While watching television6 (11.11%)
4. On tricycles5 (9.25%)
5. During nappy change3 (5.56%)
6. While climbing to mother’s trunk2 (3.70%)
Behaviours during the spells (some children exhibited more than one behavioural change)1. Flushing and sweating35 (64.81%)
2. Fatigue7 (12.96%)
3. Sleep6 (11.11%)
4. Grunting noises13 (20.07%)
Investigations1. Urine RE and C/S, Stool RE (done to everyone, all reported normal)100%
2. MRI brain and EEG (done in two children with suspect epilepsy reported normal)3.70%
Treatments1. No treatment required38 (70.37%)
2. Psychiatry consultation and behavioural therapy16 (29.63%)
Follow-up/ImprovementAll children showed improvement (reduction in frequency of spells) in 1-year follow-up period100%

It was possible to make a firm diagnosis by careful history taking and observation of videoclips in 49 children (90.74%). In spite of careful examination of video-recordings, diagnosis was in doubt in 2 of such children. Three families could not provide any video-recording of the events. Thus, 5 children (9.26%) required hospitalisation so that the episodes could be directly observed by the medical personnel to make a more confident diagnosis [Table/Fig-2].

The frequency of events varied from 3/week to 19/week (mean of 10.31±5.10 times/week). The mean length of events was 9.83±5.98 minutes (range 3 min to 26 min) [Table/Fig-2].

Parental aggression was noticed in one case (1.85%) and familial disharmony was noticed in two cases (3.70%). History of gratification habit in other sibling was reported in two families.

Detailed physical, neurological and genital examination were performed on all children and findings were mostly noncontributory. Routine urine and stool tests and urine culture results, performed on all, were reported normal. MRI brain and EEG were performed on two children referred to us as epilepsy. No abnormality was detected in any, and anticonvulsant was stopped in both. Parents of all children were advised to use distraction technique on noticing the spell and to avoid creating stressful situation for them. This simple step helped most of the children (n=38, 70.37%) in the present study group. Sixteen children (29.63%), however, were sent for behaviour therapy and all of them responded well within next one year. No other behavioural problem was noticed among them.

Discussion

Masturbation is a normal human behaviour and it can occur at any age [1,2,6]. Most of the physiological changes that happen in adolescents or adults, also happen to these children. The difference between children doing it and others is that, children do not know what they are doing is sexual yet [1-3].

Among 54 children in the present study population, 29 (53.70%) were girls and 25 (46.30 %) were boys. Most of the studies in literature shows higher prevalence of gratification behaviours among girls [Table/Fig-3] [4,5,11,13-15]. Tashakori A et al., however found boys masturbating more than girls in their study on 98 children [9]. Most parents in the present study (n=32, 59.26%) did not come to seek medical attention with masturbation or gratification as principal complaint. They came with some other health issues of their children and during conversation; one of the parents initiated the topic. Almost all the parents expressed a feeling of guilt and shame while discussing these events. Othman SA and Unal F also had similar experiences during their study period [11,16]. Exact prevalence of childhood gratification and its’ gender distribution is very difficult to know since lot of factors like cultural and religious beliefs, social awareness and understanding regarding sex and sexuality, and educational status of the parents, all interfere with the pattern of reporting of such events across different cultures, societies and countries [14,17].

Comparison of clinical data of other similar studies with the present study [4,5,11,13-15].

Clinical characteristicsNechay A et al., [5]Yang ML et al., [13]Hiyam Shamo’on [14]Ajlouni HK et al., [15]Othman SA [11]Gündüz S et al., [4]Present study
Place and time periodFraser of Allander Neurosciences Unit, Scotland. 1972-20024 paediatric neurology clinics, USA. 1997-2002Paediatricclinic of Queen Alia Military Hospital, Jordan. 2000-20043 paediatric neurology clinics, Jordan. 2004-2006Paediatric Medicine OPD, Sea Ports Corporation Hospital, Sudan. 2011-2012Paediatric Medicine OPD Turgut Özal University, Turkey. 2015Paediatric Medicine OPD, Burdwan Medical College, India. 2014-2019
Study population31 children(Male-11, Female-20) Age - (0-8) years12 children(Male-0, Female-12) Age- (0-5) years15 children(Male-6, Female-9) Age- (0-6) years13 children(Male-3, Female-10) Age- (0-5) years11 children(Male-6, Female-5) Age- (0-8) years11 children(Male-3, Female-8) Age- (0-5) years54 children(Male-25, Female-29) Age- (0-5) years
Age at first symptoms (mean/median, range)12.5 months (2 months to 5 years 5 months)11 months (3 months to 3 years)18.5 months19.5 months (4 months to 3 years)38.9 months (10 months to 6 years)20.91±11.88 months (6 months to 3 years 3 months)20.98±9.31 months (3 months to 3 years 4 months)
Age at final diagnosis (mean/median±range)35 months (5 months to 8 years)Data unavailable10 months to 6 years2.02±0.91 years6 years (1 to 8 years)26.63±12.61 months (8 months to 4 years)26.16±11.35 months (4 months to 3 years 11 months)
Average frequency of events16 times/week (1/week to 12/day)Data unavailable3 times/ week to 10 times/ day.4 times/dayData unavailable8±7.47 times/week (1/week to 21/week)10.31±5.10 times/week (3/week to 19/week)
Average duration of spells9 minutes (30 seconds to 2 hours)less than 1 minute to several hours7 minutes3.9 minutesData unavailable7.45±4.25 minutes (2 minutes to 15 minutes)9.83±5.98 minutes (3 minutes to 26 minutes)
Common manifestationsDystonic posture with rubbing of thighs-19, Rocking pelvic movements-9Dystonic posturing-12, Rhythmic pelvic movements-11Dystonic posture with crossed legs-10, Rocking pelvic movements-10Prone-10, Supine-3, Knee-chest position-2Dystonic posture, crossed legs, supine-4 Rocking in prone position-4 Direct genital manipulation-3Supine-4, Prone-4, Hand on pubic area-7Rocking in prone position-24 Dystonic posture, crossed legs, supine-23 Direct genital manipulation-3, rocking and rubbing of both legs-2, Grunting noise-2
Situation when events took placeCar seat-11, Any situation-10, When bored-5, In relation to sleeping-5, When tired-3, In front of televioion-2, In baby walker-2Not clearNo definite time-12, During nappy change-3Data unavailableWhen bored-3, Baby sitter-2, Sleep related-2Not clearWhen bored-34, Any situation-11, While watching television-6, On tricycles-5, During nappy change-3, Climbing on mother’s trunk-2
Behaviours during spellsGrunting noises-10, Vacant look-7, Sweating-6, Fatigue-4, Induction of sleep-4, Pale and frightened-1Grunting-12, Sweating-4, Irregular breathing-12, Facial flushing-8, Vacant staring-7Sweating-8, Vacant look- 6, Grunting noises-2, Frightened-2Facial flushing-13, Sweating-5, Induction of sleep-9Sweating and flushing-8Sweating-6, Vocalisation-4Sweating and flushing-35, Grunting noises-13, Fatigue-7, Sleep-6
Common misdiagnosisEpilepsy-suspected and investagted-12, treated with drugs-1 Dystonia-1Movement disorder-12 (8 patient received various drugs including ani-epileptics)Suspect UTI-8, Pain abdomen-4, Possible epilepsy-3Epilepsy-5Epilepsy-1, UTI-1Suspect epilepsy-1Epilepsy-2, Dystonia-2
Video recordings9 helped in diagnosisAll had videoclips of the events1 patientData unavailableWas available in 1 and it helpedAll had video-recordings of the eventsWas available in 51, helped in 49
Treatment and follow-upNot mentioned11 showed improvementBehavioural treatment-13, Local xylocaine gel application-210 children lost to follow-upNot mentionedPsychiatry consultation for all16 needed psychiatric consultation and behaviour therapy

Most of the children in the present study manifested such behaviour before 3 years of age (mean age at first presentation was 20.98±9.31 months). Nechay A et al., observed a mean age of 12.5 months at presentation in their study [5]. Hiyam Shamo’on found in his study on Jordan population, 18.5 months as mean age at first symptoms [14]. Nechay A et al., found in their study of 31 children with gratification habits: average age at diagnosis was 35 months; the frequency of events varied from 1/week to 12/day; mean length of the spells was 9 minutes [5]. Hiyam Shamo’on reported the frequency of the event to vary from 3 times/week to 10 times/day [14]. The mean duration of the event was 7 minutes. The study findings on these features were consistent with these studies [5,14]. Average delay between first manifestation and diagnosis of the event was less in the present study (mean delay of 5.3 months, range- 1 month to 1 year 1 month) as compared to Nechay A et al., study findings (mean delay of 16 months) [5]. Most common patterns of gratification noticed in the present study were tightening of the thighs with dystonic posturing in girls (n=23, 42.59%) and rocking in prone position in boys (n=17, 31.49%). Direct genital manipulation was uncommon and was seen only in 3 children (5.56%). These findings were consistent with other studies [5,7,11,14]. In most studies children seemed to have a delightful feeling during the episodes [4,5,11,14]; Nechay A, et al., however, reported one child to be cyanosed and frightened during the spell [5]. Two children in the present study population were initially misdiagnosed as epilepsy and were put on anticonvulsants, and other two children were referred to us for further evaluation of possible dystonia. Misdiagnosis in this age group possibly happens due diverse and sometimes peculiar manifestations of the spells, striking absence of direct genital manipulation in most cases and lack of awareness among parents and paediatricians about this entity. Nechay A et al., Fleisher DR and Morrison A, and Ibrahim A and Raymond B reported instances of childhood gratification being initially misdiagnosed and treated as epilepsy [5,7,10]. Mink JW and Neil JJ, and Yang ML et al., reported that childhood gratification was misdiagnosed as movement disorders [12,13]. Fleisher DR and Morrison A, and Couper RT and Huynh H have described dramatic examples of masturbation mimicking abdominal pain in girls [7,8]. With smartphones being available to almost every family now-a-days, it is possible to video-record all these events. This can clarify most of the findings and misdiagnosis can thus be avoided.

Aetiology and predisposing factors of gratification behaviours in children are still poorly understood [9,15,17,18]. Possible sexual abuse, genital irritation, familial stress, emotional deprivation and lack of breast feeding were found to have a positive correlation with childhood gratification behaviour [10,15-17]. No relationship was obtained between masturbation and factors such as age, gender, parental education, being a single-child, being a first born and the baby’s sleeping place in the study conducted by Tashakori A et al., [9]. The present study was on a small sample and it was not a case-control study to make any assumption on aetiological perspectives.

Childhood gratification can be diagnosed clinically based on meticulous history taking, careful evaluation of videoclips in presence of parents and sometimes by direct observation of the act [5,11,14,19]. Unnecessary investigations should be avoided. Once diagnosis is established, possibility of sexual abuse and sources of genital irritation have to be ruled out. Parents should be counselled and reassured about the benign nature of the entity. They should be taught that punishing the child or shouting at them does not help, rather attempt should be made to distract them during episodes and to engage them into another playful activity [19-21]. Some children, however, might require psychiatric evaluation and behavioural therapy.

Limitation(s)

Most of the data available on childhood gratification are derived either from case reports or from studies carried out on very small sample sizes. This holds true for the present study also.

Further prospective studies including cases and controls need to be carried out on sufficiently larger population size to understand why some children are more prone to these kind of behavious than others; and these children should be prospectively followed-up well into their adulthood to observe whether these early childhood behaviours impart any adverse effect on their adult psycho-sexual tendencies.

Conclusion(s)

Gratification behaviour can be seen in young children, and it is not pathological. Owing to various religious and cultural taboos attached to this, it can be a cause of enormous anxiety and guilty feelings among parents and family members. All paediatricians should be aware of the condition and its various display patterns in order to diagnose them timely and to avoid unnecessary investigations and harmful therapy. Since paediatricians occupy a privileged place in all societies, they can play an important role to educate children and parents about normal sexual development and to help prevent or rectify misconceptions about masturbation or gratification habits.

Author’s contribution: BB- Concept, manuscript writing and critical revision; MK, AS- Manuscript editing; MD, SM, RK- Compilation of records, review of literature.

References

[1]Strachan E, Staples B, Masturbation Paediatrics in Review 2012 33:190-91.10.1542/pir.33-4-19022474119  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Wilkinson B, John RM, Understanding masturbation in the paediatric patient J Paediatr Health Care 2018 32(6):639-43.10.1016/j.pedhc.2018.05.00130075984  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Mallants C, Casteels K, Practical approach to childhood masturbation-A review Eur J Paediatr 2008 167(10):1111-17.10.1007/s00431-008-0766-218575886  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Gündüz S, Uşak E, Yüksel CN, Eren A, Early childhood masturbation Medical Journal of Islamic World Academy of Sciences 2015 23(2):59-62.10.12816/0014500  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[5]Nechay A, Ross LM, Stephenson JBP, O’Regan M, Gratification disorder (“infantile masturbation”): A review Arch Dis Child 2004 89:225-26.10.1136/adc.2003.03210214977696  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Fernández VR, Cajal CL, In utero gratification behaviour in male fetus Prenatal Diagnosis 2016 36:985-86.10.1002/pd.492327601352  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Fleisher DR, Morrison A, Masturbation mimicking abdominal pain or seizures in young girls J Paediatr 1990 116:810-14.10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82678-2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Couper RT, Huynh H, Female masturbation masquerading as abdominal pain J Paediatr Child Health 2002 38:199-200.10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00769.x12031007  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Tashakori A, Safavi A, Neamatpour S, Lessons learned from the study of masturbation and its comorbidity with psychiatric disorders in children: The first analytic study Electron Physician 2017 9(4):4096-100.10.19082/409628607641  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Ibrahim A, Raymond B, Gratification disorder mimicking childhood epilepsy in an 18-month-old Nigerian girl: A case report and review of the literature Indian J Psychol Med 2013 35(4):417-19.10.4103/0253-7176.12224724379510  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Othman SA, Self-gratification in sudanese children: Indisputable but implausible. case reports and literature review Merit Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 2015 3(9):459-61.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Mink JW, Neil JJ, Masturbation mimicking paroxysmal dystonia or dyskinesia in a young girl Mov Disord 1995 10:518-20.10.1002/mds.8701004217565838  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Yang ML, Fullwood E, Goldstein J, Mink JW, Masturbation in infancy and early childhood presenting as a movement disorder: 12 cases and a review of the literature Paediatrics 2005 116:1427-32.10.1542/peds.2005-053216322167  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Hiyam Shamo’on, Early childhood masturbation: A clinical study JMJ 2005 39(1):23-26.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Ajlouni HK, Daoud AS, Ajlouni SF, Ajlouni KM, Infantile and early childhood masturbation: Sex hormones and clinical profile Ann Saudi Med 2010 30(6):471-74.10.4103/0256-4947.7227121060161  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Unal F, Predisposing factors in childhood masturbation in Turkey Eur J Paediatr 2000 159:338-42.10.1007/s00431005128310834518  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Kellogg ND, Clinical report-The evaluation of sexual behaviours in children Paediatrics 2009 124:992-98.10.1542/peds.2009-169219720674  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Doust ZK, Shariat M, Zabandan N, Tabrizi A, Tehrani F, Diagnostic value of the urine mucus test in childhood masturbation among children below 12 years of age: A cross-sectional study from Iran Iran J Med Sci 2016 41(4):283-87.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Pandurangi AA, Pandurangi SA, Mangalwedhe SB, Mahadevaiah M, Gratification behaviour in a young child: Course and management Journal of the Scientific Society 2016 43(1):48-50.10.4103/0974-5009.175464  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[20]Omran MS, Ghofrani M, Juibary AG, Infantile masturbation and paroxysmal disorders Indian J Paediatr 2008 75(2):183-85.10.1007/s12098-008-0028-318334803  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Franić T, Franić IU, Infantile masturbation- exclusion of severe diagnosis does not exclude parental distress- Case report Psychiatria Danubina 2011 23(4):398-99.  [Google Scholar]