JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/45161.13845
Year : 2020 | Month : Jul | Volume : 14 | Issue : 07 Full Version Page : OC13 - OC16

Evaluation of Aetiology and Outcome of Acute Kidney Injury in a Tertiary Care Hospital of India- A Prospective Observational Study

VS Gaurav Narayan1, SG Ramya2, Sonal Rajesh Kumar3, SK Nellaiappa Ganesan4

1 Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
4 Professor, Department of General Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Ramya SG, 204, B Block, SRM Medical Staff Quarters, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dr.sgramya@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a rapid decline in renal filtration function. The aetiological spectrum, prevalence of AKI and outcome is highly variable. This variation exists due to the difference in the criteria used, study population and demographic features. Huge differences are noted when AKI is compared in developing and developed countries. Hence, it is important to analyse the spectrum of AKI to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment which shall help in improving the outcome.

Aim

To study the prevalence, aetiology and outcome of AKI in the medical intensive care.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study conducted in a medical intensive care for 18 months where 1490 patients were screened and 403 patients were included as AKI by KDIGO criteria. History, examination, appropriate investigations and treatment details including dialysis were noted. The serum creatinine levels were obtained every day, to know the time of onset of AKI, at the time of death or discharge, and after one month for patients who turned up for follow-up. Patients were categorised based on outcome as survivors and nonsurvivors. Survivors were divided into as fully recovered and partially recovered and those who left the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) against medical advice were termed as lost to follow-up.

Results

A total of 403 patients (27.04% of 1490) of medical intensive care admissions were found to have AKI. Sepsis was the most common cause of AKI. At the end of the month, 78.4% of AKI patients fully recovered, 1.2% partially recovered and the mortality was 14.9%. Mortality was higher in AKI associated with chronic medical conditions like cardiac failure, chronic liver disease and stroke.

Conclusion

If treated early, AKI is mostly reversible. Regional differences in AKI should be studied extensively and local guidelines should be formulated by experts for prevention and early treatment, to improve the disease outcome.

Keywords

Introduction

AKI, previously called acute renal failure is characterised by sudden impairment of kidney function causing accumulation of nitrogenous and other waste products which are normally excreted by the kidneys. The earlier term acute renal failure has been shunned by nephrologists worldwide as a person having AKI may not have permanent loss of renal function and is often completely reversible [1].

AKI is classified based on underlying mechanism into prerenal, renal and postrenal types [2]. It is observed that the age group, aetiology and outcome differ between developed and developing countries and between centres within countries [3-5]. Studies have also identified a drastic change in the trend of aetiologies of AKI. There was a significant drop in the incidence of surgical, and obstetric related AKI, whereas there was a rise in the incidence of AKI due to sepsis, drugs and chronic diseases [3,4]. The prevalence of AKI in hospital set up varies between 17 to 50% in various studies [5-7]. Our country lacks a central registry of AKI, thereby epidemiology of AKI is in grey area and highly variable. Since the impact of AKI on all-cause mortality and cost of healthcare is significant in developing countries like India, it is essential to implement effective strategies for prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of AKI, according to changing trends specific to our geographical area. Studies specific to southern part of India are limited in this regard [8-10]. This study helps in better understanding of prevalence, current trend of aetiological pattern and outcome of AKI in our geographical area, which may help in improving the outcome of AKI patients.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study conducted in medical intensive care in a tertiary hospital of India for a period of 18 months (January 2017 to June 2018).

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age above 18 years, who were admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with AKI or who developed AKI within 48 hours of admission into ICU by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were recruited for the study [11].

AKI is defined as any of the following:

Increase in Serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours; or

Increase in Serum creatinine to ≥1.5 times baseline, which is known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days; or Urine volume <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known pre-existing renal disease like interstitial nephritis, polycystic kidney disease end stage renal disease, patients who received renal transplant, and surgical postoperative patients in medical ICU were excluded.

After obtaining ethical clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee (937/IEC/2016), 1490 patients admitted in medical ICU in study period were screened and 403 patients were selected for study by convenient sampling method according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The minimum sample size was calculated as 288 using sample size formula for single proportion with approximate prevalence as 25% from previous studies and 95% confidence interval [12-14]. They were subjected to detailed history and clinical examination. All the patients underwent the complete haemogram, fasting and postprandial sugars, serum bilirubin and liver enzymes, serum electrolytes, blood urea, serum creatinine, routine urine examination and microscopy, ultrasonography of abdomen and pelvis. Other specific investigations based on individual patients like blood culture, renal biopsy, CT abdomen were also performed. Treatment details including dialysis were noted. The serum creatinine levels were obtained every day, to know the time of onset of AKI, at the time of death or discharge, and after one month for patients who turned up for follow-up. Serum creatinine estimation was done by modified Jaffe method using autoanalyser [15]. AKI staging was done according to KDIGO into stage I, II and III based on rise in serum creatinine.

The urine output criteria were not utilised in this study due to practical constraints. Patients were categorised based on outcome as survivors and nonsurvivors. Survivors were divided into as fully recovered and partially recovered and those who left the ICU against medical advice were termed as lost to follow-up (n=22).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was analysed with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 20 software. Continuous data are expressed as mean±standard deviation, and the means of the survivor and nonsurvivor were compared using an unpaired t-test. Nominal data are expressed as frequencies or proportions, and the Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in frequency between the two study groups. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

During the study period, 1490 patients admitted in the ICU were screened and 403 patients who developed AKI which accounted for 27.04% of the total ICU population. The mean age among the cases was 56±16 years. The maximum number of patients belonged to the age group of 51-65 years (32.7%). The prevalence of AKI was more in male patients (62% in males versus 38% in females). Diabetes was the most common comorbidity associated and there were no comorbidities in 147 patients constituting 36.5% of study population [Table/Fig-1]. 173 patients were having single comorbidities and remainjng 83 had either multiple comorbidities or rare diseases like myasthenia, PAH, cervical carcinoma etc.

Distribution of age, sex and co-morbidities of study population with comparison of survivor and nonsurvivor group. (Chi-square test was used to calculate p-value).

GroupsFrequency (Percentage of total study population) (403)Survivor, (321) (%)Nonsurvivor (60) (%)p-value comparing survivor and nonsurvivorLost to follow-up (22) (%)
Age group in (years)
18-3545 (11.1%)38 (84.4%)2 (4.4%)0.1815 (11.1%)
36-50105 (26.0%)83 (79.0%)17 (16.2%)5 (4.8%)
51-65132 (32.7%)106 (80.3%)19 (14.4%)7 (5.3%)
66-8099 (24.5%)75 (75.8%)20 (20.2%)4 (4%)
>8022 (5.4%)19 (86.4%)2 (2%)1 (4.5%)
Sex
Male250 (62%)196 (78.4%)40 (16.0%)0.41214 (5.6%)
Female153 (38%)125 (1.7%)20 (13.1%)8 (5.2%)
Comorbidities
Diabetes91 (22.6%)77 (84.6%)9 (9.9%)0.125 (5.5%)
Hypertension53 (13.2%)43 (81.1%)8 (15.1%)0.882 (3.8%)
Coronary artery disease29 (7.1%)26 (89.6%)3 (10.4%)0.40Nil

Sepsis was the most common aetiology of AKI in our study (33.7%) followed by other causes such as cardiac failure (13.3%), stroke (11.9%), chronic liver disease (9.4%), Post renal causes (8.4%) and diarrheal diseases (7.9%). The aetiologies which constituted less than 5% each were acute glomerulonephritis (1.9%), drug induced AKI (4.4%), snake bite (4.4%), undiagnosed AKI (1.4%) and miscellaneous causes (2.7%) which comprised of HELLP syndrome (Haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets), sick sinus syndrome, carcinoma of the breast, metastatic cervical carcinoma, myasthenic crisis, severe pulmonary hypertension, benzodiazepine poisoning, Organophosphate compound poisoning, Oleander seed poisoning, multiple myeloma and hypertensive emergency. Among the total study population, 58 patients required dialysis, accounting for 14.4% of the AKI cases [Table/Fig-2]. The postrenal causes were renal calculi, benign prostatic hyperplasia, stricture urethra complicated by urinary tract infection.

Distribution of staging of AKI, aetiologies and dialysed patients with comparison of survivor and nonsurvivor group. Chi-square test was used to calculate p-value.

ParameterTotal, (403) (Percentage of total study population)Survivor, (321) (%)Nonsurvivor (60) (%)p-value comparing survivor and nonsurvivorLost to follow-up (22) (%)
AKI stages based on KDIGO
I183 (45.4%)179 (97.8%)2 (1.1%)<0.001*2 (1.1%)
II118 (29.2%)90 (76.3%)12 (10.2%)16 (13.6%)
III102 (25.3%)52 (51%)46 (45.1%)4 (3.9%)
Aetiology of AKI
Sepsis136 (33.7%)112 (82.3%)17 (12.5%)0.327 (5.2%)
Diarrhoeal disease32 (7.9%)28 (87.6%)2 (6.2%)0.152 (6.2%)
Cardiac failure54 (13.3%)36 (66.6%)15 (27.7%)0.004*3 (10.7%)
Chronic liver disease38 (9.4%)30 (78.9%)8 (21.1%)0.34-
Acute glomerulonephritis8 (1.9%)7 (87.5%)--1 (12.5%)
Stroke48 (11.9%)35 (72.9%)13 (27.1%)0.02*-
Drug induced18 (4.4%)15 (83.3%)--3 (16.7%)
Postrenal34 (8.4%)30 (88.2%)3 (8.8%)0.271 (3%)
Snake bite18 (4.4%)16 (88.8%)--2 (11.2%)
Others11 (2.7%)8 (72.7%)2 (18.2%)0.71 (9.1%)
Undiagnosed6 (1.4%)4 (66.7%)--2 (33.4%)
Total403 (100%)321 (79.6%)60 (14.9%)-22 (5.5%)
Dialysis58 (14.4%)21 (36.2%)36 (62%)<0.001*1 (1.7%)

*p-value significant at 95% confidence interval.


Among 403 patients of AKI, 321 (79.6%) recovered and 60 patients (14.9%) died. A total of 22 patients (5.5%) patients were lost to follow-up as they left the ICU against medical advice. Among survivors (n=321), 316 patients had complete recovery (78.4%) and 5 patients had partial recovery (1.2%) [Table/Fig-3]. Patients progressing to CKD could not be ascertained in this study as the patients were followed-up only after 1 month. The highest observed mortality rate (20.2%) was in the 66-80 age group [Table/Fig-1]. There was significant difference in mortality among the various stages of AKI. Mortality in stage I, II and III AKI were 1.1%, 10.2% and 45.1%, respectively [Table/Fig-2].

Outcome of AKI at the end of 1 month.

SurvivalGroup based on recoveryFrequencyPercentage
Survivors (n=321)Fully recovered at end of 1 month31678.4%
Partially recovered at end of 1 month51.2%
Nonsurvivors-6014.9%
Lost to follow-up-225.5%

Among the various aetiologies, mortality was significantly higher in AKI with cardiac failure (27.7%), and stroke (27.1%). Survivors and nonsurvivors were compared statistically and it was found that mortality significantly increased as the staging of AKI increased (p-value <0.001). Cardiac failure and stroke caused significant mortality (p-value=0.004 and 0.02 respectively). Among those patients who underwent dialysis, the mortality was 62% [Table/Fig-2].

Discussion

This prospective observational study included 403 patients of AKI by KDIGO criteria and their aetiology and outcome were analysed at the end of one month. AKI was noted in 27.04% of medical intensive care admissions. The prevalence of AKI in intensive care setup is highly variable from studies all over the world. In a multinational study done by Hoste EAJ et al., in the intensive care setup, 57.3% of ICU admissions had AKI [5]. Case J et al., observed that AKI was noted in patients ranged from 20% to 50% with lower incidence seen in elective surgical patients and higher incidence in sepsis patients [12]. Similarly in an Indian study by Avasti G et al., AKI was noted in 17.2% of medical ICU patients compared to 3.1% in surgical ICU [13]. Korula S et al., noted AKI in 16.1% of medical ICU patients [14]. This is comparable with prevalence of our study done in medical intensive care.

The mean age of study population was 56±16 years and 32.7% of the total cases/population belonged to 51-65 years of age. Studies of AKI conducted in India by Eswarappa M et al., Thabah M et al., and Avasti G et al., showed that majority of patients belong to 40-60 years similar to our study [8,9,13].

Males were found to be affected more compared to females (62% versus 38%) similar to other studies [4,9,14,16]. Diabetes (22.6%) was the commonest comorbidity followed by hypertension (13.2%) and coronary artery disease (7.19%). Eswarappa M et al., Thabah M et al., and Korula S et al., also noted diabetes as the most common comorbidity followed by hypertension [8,9,14].

The percentage of the study population in stage I, stage II and stage III AKI were 45.4%, 29.2% and 25.3%, respectively. Hence, majority of study population belonged to less severe, potentially reversible form of AKI like other studies on AKI [16,17].

The most common aetiology of AKI in the present study was sepsis (33.7%). The major cause of sepsis was urinary tract infection, followed by pneumonia and aspiration pneumonitis. Sepsis is found to be the most common aetiology all over the world witnessed by multiple studies [8,9,14,16-18]. Urogenital sepsis was noted as most common cause by Eswarappa M et al., Thabah M et al., and Shah P et al., but Bagshaw SM et al., observed that the predominant sources of sepsis were chest and abdomen [8,9,17,18]. Priyamvada PS et al., found skin was the most common source of sepsis [16]. Prakash J et al., and Singh TB et al., observed drugs as the most common aetiology of AKI [4,19].

The other aetiologies of AKI observed were cardiac failure (13.3%), stroke (11.9%), chronic liver disease (9.4%), postrenal causes (8.4%) and diarrhoeal diseases (7.9%). The aetiologies of AKI observed by Priyamvada PS et al., were 18% due to neurological causes, 14% due to cardiac causes and 4% due to hepatic causes [16]. This pattern of aetiology was similar to that of study by Eswarappa M et al., except that cardiac causes and stroke leading to AKI is higher in our study comparatively [8]. A study by Tsagalis G et al., showed that nearly 1 in 4 patients with stroke developed AKI [20].

The cardiac causes noted were predominantly acute decompensated heart failure secondary to myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease. The most common cause of AKI in liver disease was volume responsive prerenal azotemia in this study, followed by hepatorenal syndrome and acute tubular necrosis similar to a study done by Russ KB et al., [21]. Drugs implicated with AKI in this study were NSAIDS (27.7%), aminoglycoside (22.2%), contrast agents (16.6%), ACE inhibitors (11.1%), unknown native medicines (11.1%), Amlodipine overdose (5.5%) and Cyclosporine (5.5%). Priyamvada PS et al., observed that 30% of AKI was due to drugs and toxins. NSAIDs and aminoglycosides were the most common culprit similar to our study [16]. A total of 14.4% of study population required dialysis. Thabah M et al., observed 21.5% required dialysis and Priyamvada PS et al., observed 30% required dialysis [9,16]. Mortality was observed in 14.9% of total study population where as 78.4% of patients completely recovered at the end of 1 month and 1.2% of patients had partial recovery (creatinine level did not fall back to normal reference range). The mortality rates of AKI reported by other studies in India are higher than that of this study. Ali T et al., reported 33% in hospital mortality and full recovery in 92.5% of survivors [22]. The mortality rates reported by Umesh L et al., Priyamvada PS et al., and Kashinkunti MD, were 52.5%, 28.3% and 9.61%, respectively [10,16,23]. Hoste EAJ et al., in a multinational study on AKI using KDIGO criteria reported around 18% mortality rate [5]. This variability in mortality rates can be explained by varying demographical characteristics of patients, inclusion of surgical intensive care patients, comorbid conditions and different study designs. Higher mortality was observed in males and age more than 65 years. Stage III AKI showed higher mortality (45.1%) compared to stage I AKI and stage II AKI similar to study by Hoste EAJ et al., and Bagshaw SM et al., [5,17]. The mortality in patients who underwent dialysis was 62%. AKI associated with cardiac failure and stroke showed significantly higher mortality.

In the two multicentric studies on AKI by Cerda J et al., and Bouchard J et al., AKI in developed countries were found to be associated with multiorgan failure and sepsis, high mortality, and occurrence in older populations. Similar results were noted in urban centres of developing countries. Mortality was higher in developed countries than developed countries (27.6% versus 17.65%). AKI in rural areas of developing countries were found to occur in younger population, due to single disease and lesser mortality [3,24]. The centre of this study is situated in semi urban area. Though sepsis was the most common cause of AKI in this centre, the mean age is lesser and outcome is better when compared to developed countries. The local guidelines on treatment strategies of AKI which specifically caters the pattern of disease should be developed by experts to improve the outcome.

Strength(s)

This study enlightens about the changing spectrum of AKI in South India and prospective studies using KDIGO criteria which are limited in the area studied.

Limitation(s)

Urine output criteria were not used in the study due to practical constraints which would have missed few cases of AKI and the progression to chronic kidney disease is not studied at the end of three months.

Conclusion(s)

AKI was noted in 27.04% of medical intensive care admissions and the prevalence increased with age. Sepsis was the most common cause of AKI. Major proportion of AKI patients recovered at the end of 1 month and the mortality observed in this study was 14.9%. Mortality was higher in AKI associated with chronic medical conditions and multiple comorbidities. Hence, it is important to identify the aetiology for early initiation of treatment as AKI is predominantly a potentially reversible disease.

*p-value significant at 95% confidence interval.

References

[1]Hilton R, Acute renal failure BMJ 2006 333(7572):786-90.10.1136/bmj.38975.657639.AE17038736  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Makris K, Spanou L, Acute Kidney Injury: Definition, Pathophysiology and Clinical Phenotypes Clin Biochem Rev 2016 37(2):85-98.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Cerdá J, Bagga A, Kher V, Chakravarthi R, The contrasting characteristics of acute kidney injury in developed and developing countries Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology 2008 4(3):138-53.10.1038/ncpneph072218212780  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Prakash J, Singh TB, Ghosh B, Malhotra V, Rathore SS, Vohra R, Changing epidemiology of community-acquired acute kidney injury in developing countries: Analysis of 2405 cases in 26 years from eastern India Clinical Kidney Journal 2013 6(2):150-55.10.1093/ckj/sfs17826019843  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Hoste EAJ, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Cely CM, Colman R, Cruz DN, Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: The multinational AKI-EPI study Intensive Care Med 2015 41(8):1411-23.10.1007/s00134-015-3934-726162677  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Mohammed ZA, Suresh AA, Kumar P, Attur RP, Acute kidney injury: Prevalence and outcomes in southern Indian population Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2018 12(5):LC05-10.10.7860/JCDR/2018/32512.11486  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[7]Lameire NH, Bagga A, Cruz D, DeMaeseneer J, Endre Z, Kellum J, Acute kidney injury: An increasing global concern Lancet 2013 382(9887):170-79.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60647-9  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Eswarappa M, Gireesh MS, Ravi V, Kumar D, Dev G, Spectrum of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: A single center study from South India Indian J Nephrol 2014 24(5):280-85.10.4103/0971-4065.13299125249716  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Thabah M, Kaaviya R, Vadivelan M, Balamurugan N, Parameswaran S, Community acquired AKI: A prospective observational study from a tertiary level hospital in Southern India Indian J Nephrol 2019 29(4):25410.4103/ijn.IJN_238_1831423059  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Umesh L, Shivaprasad SM, Niranjan MR, Leelavathi V, Sreedhara CG, Rajiv EN, Acute kidney injury: Experience from a state run tertiary care centre in Southern India Int J Med Res Health Sci 2016 5(5):83-87.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute kidney injury work groupKDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury Kidney Int 2012 2:01-138.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Case J, Khan S, Khalid R, Khan A, Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit Crit Care Res Pract 2013 2013:47973010.1155/2013/47973023573420  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Avasthi G, Sandhu JS, Mohindra K, Acute renal failure in medical and surgical intensive care units-a one year prospective study Renal Failure 2003 25(1):105-13.10.1081/JDI-12001747312617338  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Korula S, Balakrishnan S, Sundar S, Paul V, Balagopal A, Acute kidney injury-incidence, prognostic factors, and outcome of patients in an Intensive Care Unit in a tertiary center: A prospective observational study Indian J Crit Care Med 2016 20(6):332-36.10.4103/0972-5229.18390427390456  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Peake M, Whiting M, Measurement of serum creatinine-current status and future goals Clin Biochem Rev 2006 27(4):173-84.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Priyamvada PS, Jayasurya R, Shankar V, Parameswaran S, Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center Indian J Nephrol 2018 28(6):413-20.10.4103/ijn.IJN_191_1730647494  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R, A comparison of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(5):1569-74.10.1093/ndt/gfn00918281319  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Shah P, Gireesh M, Kute V, Vanikar A, Gumber M, Patel H, Renal involvement in sepsis: A prospective single-center study of 136 cases Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2013 24(3):62010.4103/1319-2442.11108923640650  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Singh TB, Rathore SS, Choudhury TA, Shukla VK, Singh DK, Prakash J, Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury in medical, surgical, and intensive care unit: A comparative study Indian J Nephrol 2013 23(1):24-29.10.4103/0971-4065.10719223580801  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Tsagalis G, Akrivos T, Alevizaki M, Manios E, Theodorakis M, Laggouranis A, Long-term prognosis of acute kidney injury after first acute stroke CJASN 2009 4(3):616-22.10.2215/CJN.0411080819211666  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Russ KB, Stevens TM, Singal AK, Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis J Clin Transl Hepatol 2015 3(3):195-204.10.14218/JCTH.2015.0001526623266  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Ali T, Khan I, Simpson W, Prescott G, Townend J, Smith W, Incidence and outcomes in acute kidney injury: A comprehensive population-based study J Am Soc Nephrol 2007 18(4):1292-98.10.1681/ASN.200607075617314324  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Kashinkunti MD, Clinical spectrum of Acute Kidney injury: A study from tertiary care hospital Int J Pharmaceut Biol Res 2013 4(4):165-69.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Bouchard J, Acharya A, Cerda J, Maccariello ER, Madarasu RC, Tolwani AJ, A prospective international multicenter study of AKI in the intensive care unit CJASN 2015 10(8):1324-31.10.2215/CJN.0436051426195505  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]