JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Psychiatry/Mental Health Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/44389.13789
Year : 2020 | Month : Jun | Volume : 14 | Issue : 06 Full Version Page : VC09 - VC12

Spirituality and Abstinence Self-efficacy in Patients with Alcohol Dependence Syndrome

Dinesh Panati1, Ramya Keerthi Paradesi2, Vinay Kumar Sayeli3, Swetha Panati4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
4 Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Ramya Keerthi Paradesi, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Venkateswara Medical College, Tirupati-517507, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: pramyakeerthi@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Spirituality and self-efficacy are the concepts related to health, which plays a protective role in maintaining abstinence as well as predicts response to treatment in alcohol dependence patients.

Aim

To determine the correlation between Spirituality and Abstinence self-efficacy among patients with alcohol dependence syndrome.

Materials and Methods

An observational study was conducted on 50 patients with DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th edition) for diagnosis of alcohol dependence syndrome. They were recruited from the de-addiction unit of psychiatry ward at a tertiary care centre. Subjects were assessed for spirituality and abstinence self-efficacy using The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual well-being scale (FACIT Sp-12) {12 indicates total number of items in FACIT Sp questionnaire, which consists of three subscales (Meaning, Peace and Faith subscales) of four questions each} and Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy (AASE) scale. Mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency counts for discrete variables were obtained. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to determine the correlation.

Results

The current study demonstrated that the subjects had more spiritual belief in meaning and faith components and less belief in peace component of the FACIT Sp-12. AASE scale showed high efficacy (Total score=78.2±17.2) to remain abstinent. There was a significant positive correlation among two spiritual variables meaning (r-value=0.799) and faith (r-value=0.825) with negative effect, social and positive behaviour, physical and other concerns, craving and urges. There was a negative correlation (r-value=-0.026) with peace component in spiritual well-being and AASE scale.

Conclusion

Spiritual belief and AASE were found to be high in index study. Also, spiritual variables (meaning and faith) had a positive correlation with ASSE, which suggests that patients with high spiritual belief had a better capability to remain abstinent from alcohol and good long term recovery than others.

Keywords

Introduction

According to International Classification of Diseases-10th edition (ICD-10), Alcohol Dependence Syndrome is a disorder characterised by a pathological pattern of alcohol use which causes impairment in social and occupational functioning [1]. It is a chronic disease in which a person craves for drinks that contain alcohol and is notable to control his or her drinking [1]. A person with alcohol dependence needs to drink greater amounts of alcohol to get the same pleasurable effect and develops withdrawal symptoms after discontinuing alcohol use [1]. Alcoholism affects physical as well as mental health which leads to problems with family, friends and work [2].

Appearance of abstinence symptoms such as insomnia, withdrawal tremors etc., is due to interaction of biological and cultural factors, which are important phenomena in Alcohol Dependence [3]. In order to relieve the withdrawal symptoms, the person starts taking alcohol, due to which a strong association is established sustaining both the development and the maintenance of dependence [3].

Investigators have studied predictors and determinants of substance abuse risk and have identified various contributing factors such as family history, gender, alcohol sensitivity, social support, and emotional regulation [4]. Also, researchers explored other potential predictors of substance use, including spirituality and self-efficacy [5].

“Spirituality can be conceptualised as a broad-based motivational construct that can be measured in an empirically rigorous manner”, as facets of spirituality have been found as robust predictors of psychosocial outcomes of substance abuse treatment [6]. Finally, there are indications that spirituality and religiosity are relevant to health, including addiction, and might best be treated as related and complementary, if not integrated constructs [7].

Self-efficacy is defined as the belief or perceived confidence in one’s ability in order to manage a high-risk situation [8]. Perceived efficacy will determine the courses of action people will attempt, their ability to try, and persistence despite setbacks. In an interpersonal or intrapersonal high-risk situation, assessing the patient confidence about his drinking pattern will be helpful in treatment planning [8]. Self-efficacy is a strong predictor for maintaining response to the treatment in alcohol dependence and cigarette smoking [9].

Previous literature showed that there were only a few studies which have used spirituality and AASE in patients with alcohol dependence syndrome [10,11]. Hence, the current study was taken up to determine the probable correlation between spiritual well-being and AASE.

The aim of this study was to assess and determine the correlation between Spirituality and Abstinence self-efficacy among male patients with alcohol dependence syndrome.

Materials and Methods

The present study was a descriptive observational study, conducted in Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute (SRMC & RI), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from December 2013 to July 2014, for a period of eight months.

All the assessments in this study were carried out only once. The patients who attended the outpatient clinic or were admitted to the inpatient de-addiction unit of the Department of Psychiatry at SRMC &RI, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India were recruited for the study. The sample comprised of 50 patients with DSM-IV [12] diagnosis of alcohol dependence syndrome. After getting the approval of Institutional Ethics Committee (CSP-MED/13/OCT/09/98), the study was commenced. All patients fulfilling the selection criteria were approached and explained about the purpose of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all potential participants.

Inclusion Criteria:

Male patients from 18-60 years of age.

Diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence Syndrome according to DSM-IV.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with any chronic co-morbid physical or psychiatric illness.

History of other substance abuse or dependence.

Those who did not give consent to take part in the study.

Following parameters were assessed in the study:

1. Socio-demographic profile sheet: It was developed for the purpose of study. Consisted of a semi structured proforma to record the following variables regarding the patient such as age, marital status, level of education, socio-economic class, employment and residence (urban/rural). The socio-demographic profile sheet and the scales sheet were given as a hard copy to each patient and made to fill.

2. FACIT Sp-12-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT Sp-12) [13]: It has three subscales with four items in each: 1) Meaning subscale; 2) Peace subscale; and 3) Faith subscale. Each item was rated in Likert format from 0 to 4 (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Somewhat; 3=Quite a bit; and 4=Very much) and each subscale scores ranges from 0 to 16. Each subscale score was obtained by summing up individual scores which was then multiplied by four and divide by the number of items answered [13]. The total score is obtained by summing up of three subscale scores which ranges from 0 to 48. The higher the score the better the spiritual well-being.

3. AASE scale [14]: It has four subscales with five items in each: 1) Negative effect subscale; 2) Social/positive subscale; 3) Physical and other concerns sub scale; 4) Craving and urges subscale. Each item rated in Likert format from 1 to 5 (1=Not at all, 2=Not very, 3=Moderately, 4=Very, 5=Extremely) and each subscale scores ranges from 5 to 25. Mean scores for each subscale, was obtained by summing up of item scores for each subscale and divided by the number of items [14]. The higher the score, the more efficacy to remain abstinent from alcohol.

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered in a Microsoft excel sheet and analysed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15th version (SPSS version 15) under ‘descriptive’ and ‘inferential’ statistics.

Descriptive Statistics: Frequency counts were obtained for socio-demographic details. Mean and standard deviation were computed for all continuous variables e.g., age, income, subscale scores.

Inferential Statistics: Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient was used to examine the association between spiritual well-being and AASE scales.

Results

As shown in [Table/Fig-1], mean age of the male patients was 36.96±6.957 years, 76% were married, 42% were graduates, 76% were employed, patients belonging to, middle, lower middle and lower socio economic classes were 54%, 20% and 16% respectively; 72% hailed from urban locality.

Socio-demographic variables.

Socio-demographic variableN=50
Age (In years) Mean±SD36.96±6.957
Marital status N(%)
Married38 (76%)
Others12 (24%)
Level of education
High school5 (10%)
Intermediate15 (30%)
Graduate21 (42%)
Postgraduate9 (18%)
Socio-economic class
Upper3 (6%)
Upper middle2 (4%)
Middle27 (54%)
Lower middle10 (20%)
Lower8 (16%)
Employed
Yes38 (76%)
No12 (24%)
Locality (Residence)
Urban36 (72%)
Rural14 (28%)

Meaning, faith and peace subscales values are shown in [Table/Fig-2]. The total score of FACIT Sp-12 scale was 36±5.2. This indicates that patients had more spiritual belief in faith and meaning subscales, whereas low belief in peace subscale.

The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy: spiritual well-being scale (FACIT Sp- 12).

SI. no.FACIT Sp-12 subscalesN=50
Mean±SD
1Meaning12±2.3
2Faith14.5±2.8
3Peace9.4±1.3
Total36±5.2

Negative effect, social/positive, physical and other concerns and craving and urges subscales values are shown in [Table/Fig-3]. The total score of AASE scale was 78.2±17.2. This showed that patients had more abstinence self-efficacy.

Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy scale (AASE).

SI. no.AASE subscalesN=50
Mean±SD
1Negative affect16.9±3.8
2Social/Positive18.9±4.2
3Physical and other concerns20.5±4.8
4Craving and urges21.5±4.7
Total78.2±17.2

As shown in [Table/Fig-4], there was a positive correlation between meaning and faith subscales of FACIT Sp-12 scale with AASE scale at r-value 0.799 and 0.825, respectively. There was negative correlation between peace subscale of FACIT Sp-12 scale with AASE scale at r-value – 0.026.

Correlation between subscales of AASE and FACIT Sp-12.

SI. no.ParametersMeaningFaithPeace
1Negative affectr=0.685p<0.001**r=0.675p<0.001**r=-0.038p=0.767
2Social/Positiver=0.778p<0.001**r=0.823p<0.001**r=-0.003p=0.965
3Physical and other concernsr=0.739p<0.001**r=0.788p<0.001**r=-0.067p=0.616
4Craving and urgesr=0.789p<0.001**r=0.809p<0.001**r=-0.034p=0.789
Totalr=0.799p<0.001**r=0.825p<0.001**r=-0.026p=0.852

*p<0.05 statistically significant; **p<0.001 statistically highly significant


Discussion

The current study aimed at correlating FACIT Sp-12 scale with AASE scale in alcohol dependent patients. Majority of the patients in present study were middle aged males, married, had completed their graduation, belonged to middle socio-economic class and resided in urban localities. In a study done by Martins ME et al., patients were middle aged males, studied upto high school, married and active workers [15]. This can be compared with present study except that patients were well educated.

In present study, we found that Meaning and Faith subscales of FACIT Sp–12 scale had higher mean scores 12 and 14.5, respectively whereas Peace subscale which had a lower mean score of 9.4. In a study done by Jafari N et al., Meaning and Faith subscales had higher scores 10.97, 11.03 respectively, whereas peace subscale had a lower score 10.30 [16]. In another study done by Fradelos EC et al., Meaning and Faith subscales had higher scores 12.49, 9.49, respectively, whereas Peace subscale had lower score 8.64 [17]. This shows that present study can be comparable to previous studies which had similar results. This indicates that spirituality has positive role in maintaining abstinence in alcohol dependent patients. Similarly, in a study conducted by Miller WR, there was a strong evidence of spiritual involvement as a protective factor against alcohol abuse [18]. Vice versa, a study by Robinson EA et al., showed that alcohol abuse can have negative effect on spirituality [19]. So, it clearly indicates that spirituality plays a role in maintaining abstinence in alcohol dependence patients.

In present study, the total AASE score was 78.2±17.2, this higher score indicates that patients had more efficacy to remain abstinent from alcohol. Similar study in the past has shown that self-efficacy has been found to predict the alcohol use [20]. However, in a study done by Stephens RS et al., they found that self-efficacy was related to occurrence or frequency of drinking or drug use [21]. They observed Predictive validity was stronger for frequency of post-treatment substance use than for abstinence [21]. From this, it is clear that, self-efficacy helps in abstinence in alcohol dependence patients.

In present study, we found a positive correlation of Meaning and Faith subscales of FACIT Sp- 12 scale with subscales of AASE scale, pearson’s correlation values (r) 0.799 and 0.825 respectively. There was a negative correlation with Peace component of FACIT Sp-12 scale with components of AASE scale r-value -0.026. This clearly indicates that patients with greater spiritual beliefs will have more self-efficacy to remain abstinent from alcohol. Similar to present study results, a study done by Piderman KM et al., concluded that significant association exists between spiritual well-being and alcohol abstinence self-efficacy (r=0.56) [10]. In another study done by Kim MY and Byun EK a positive correlation (r=0.23) was observed between spiritual well-being with abstinence self-efficacy and it was statistically significant [22]. However, in a study conducted by Bluma L, there were no significant differences in scores obtained for FACIT Sp-12 and AASE scales with p value being 0.74 [23]. There was no difference in high or low spiritual beliefs and their abilities to remain abstinent from alcohol.

Strengths of this study included the subject’s common diagnosis of alcohol dependence, power of spirituality to remain abstinent and instruments used in the study have been used in published research. However, similar studies must be carried out for further replication and to comprehend its significance.

Limitation(s)

The sample size was relatively small. The study sample had no control group to find the impact of spiritual variables. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were not measured which are the diagnostic indicators of a mental health disorder.

Conclusion(s)

Spiritual belief and AASE were found to be higher in index study. Also, spiritual variables (Meaning and Faith) had a positive correlation with AASE, which suggests that patients with high spiritual belief may have better capability to remain abstinent from alcohol and good long term recovery.

*p<0.05 statistically significant; **p<0.001 statistically highly significant

References

[1]Schuckit MA, Smith TL, Hesselbrock V, Bucholz KK, Bierut L, Edenberg H, Clinical implications of tolerance to alcohol in nondependent young drinkers The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2008 34(2):133-49.10.1080/0095299070187700318293230  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Edwards G, Gross MM, Alcohol dependence: Provisional description of a clinical syndrome Br Med J 1976 1:1058-61.10.1136/bmj.1.6017.1058773501  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Gigliotti A, Bessa MA, Alcohol dependence syndrome: Diagnostic criteria Braz J Psychiatry 2004 26(Suppl 1):S11-13.10.1590/S1516-44462004000500004  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Hill PC, Pargament KI, Advances in the conceptualisation and measurement of religion and spirituality. Implications for physical and mental health research Am Psychol 2003 58(1):64-74.10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.6412674819  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Fleury MJ, Grenier G, Bamvita JM, Perreault M, Caron J, Predictors of alcohol and drug dependence Can J Psychiatry 2014 59(4):203-12.10.1177/07067437140590040525007113  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Shorkey C, Uebel M, Windsor LC, Measuring dimensions of spirituality in chemical dependence treatment and recovery: Research and practice Int J of Mental Health and Addiction 2008 6(3):286-305.10.1007/s11469-007-9065-9  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[7]Geppert C, Bogenschutz MP, Miller WR, Development of a bibliography on religion, spirituality and addictions Drug Alcohol Rev 2007 26(4):389-95.10.1080/0959523070137382617564874  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Williams DM, Rhodes RE, The confounded self-efficacy construct: conceptual analysis and recommendations for future research Health Psychol Rev 2016 10(2):113-28.10.1080/17437199.2014.94199825117692  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Sitharthan T, Job RF, Kavanagh DJ, Sitharthan G, Hough M, Development of a controlled drinking self-efficacy scale and appraising its relation to alcohol dependence J Clin Psychol 2003 59(3):351-62.10.1002/jclp.1012712579550  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Piderman KM, Schneekloth TD, Pankratz SV, Maloney SD, Altchuler SI, Spirituality in alcoholics during treatment The Am J on Addiction 2007 16(3):232-37.10.1080/1055049070137561617612829  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Bliss DL, Empirical research on spirituality and alcoholism: A review of the literature J of Social Work Practice in the Addictions 2007 7(4):05-25.10.1300/J160v07n04_02  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[12]Bell CC, DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders JAMA 1994 272(10):828-29.10.1001/jama.1994.03520100096046  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Bredle JM, Salsman JM, Scott M, Arnold BJ, Cella D, Spiritual well-being as a component of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) Religions 2011 2:77-94.10.3390/rel2010077  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]DiClemente CC, Carbonari JP, Montgomery RP, Hughes SO, The alcohol abstinence self-efficacy scale J Stud Alcohol 1994 55(2):141-48.10.15288/jsa.1994.55.1418189734  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Martins ME, Ribeiro LC, Feital TJ, Baracho RA, Ribeiro MS, Religious-spiritual coping and the consumption of alcoholic beverages in male patients with liver disease Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP 2012 46(6):1340-47.10.1590/S0080-6234201200060000923380776  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Jafari N, Farajzadegan Z, Loghmani A, Majlesi M, Jafari N, Spiritual well-being and quality of life of Iranian adults with type 2 diabetes Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014 2014:61902810.1155/2014/61902824600478  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Fradelos EC, Tzavella F, Koukia E, Tsaras K, Papathanasiou IV, Aroni A, The translation, validation and cultural adaptation of functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being 12 (facit-sp12) scale in Greek language Materia Socio-Medica 2016 28(3):22910.5455/msm.2016.28.229-23427482168  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Miller WR, Researching the spiritual dimensions of alcohol and other drug problems Addiction 1998 93(7):979-90.10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9379793.x9744129  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Robinson EA, Brower KJ, Kurtz E, Life-changing experiences, spirituality and religiousness of persons entering treatment for alcohol problems Alcoholism Treatment 2003 21(4):03-16.10.1300/J020v21n04_02  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[20]Maisto SA, Connors GJ, Zywiak WH, Alcohol treatment, changes in coping skills, self-efficacy, and levels of alcohol use and related problems 1 year following treatment initiation Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2000 14(3):257-66.10.1037/0893-164X.14.3.25710998951  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Stephens RS, Wertz JS, Roffman RA, Self-efficacy and marijuana cessation: A construct validity analysis Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1995 63(6):1022-31.10.1037/0022-006X.63.6.10228543705  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Kim MY, Byun EK, Factors affecting social problem-solving ability in male alcohol dependent patients J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2016 25(4):316-26.10.12934/jkpmhn.2016.25.4.316  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[23]Bluma L, The role of spirituality in alcohol abstinence self-efficacy amongst alcoholics anonymous members Drugs and Alcohol Today 2018 18(4):227-39.10.1108/DAT-09-2017-0049  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]