Ophthalmology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/43299.13554
Year : 2020 | Month : Mar | Volume : 14 | Issue : 03 Page : NC01 - NC04

Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Colour Blindness in School Going Children of Wardha Tehsil: A Prospective Study

Sana Beg1, Sohan Lohiya2

1 MBBS, Department of Ophthalmology, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Science, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Sana Beg, F12, Shalinata PG Girls Hostel, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: sanabeg22@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Subnormal vision in childhood affects performance in school or day to day activity and has a poor effect on the future life of a child. Refractive errors are one of the most common reasons and is the most easily correctable cause of vision loss as the spectacles are inexpensive, non-invasive, and useful.

Aim

To determine the Prevalence of Refractive error and Colour Blindness in school going children of Wardha District.

Materials and Methods

A Prospective cross-divtional study was conducted in 6 co-educational randomly selected schools of Wardha. History taking, torchlight examination was performed followed by recording of visual aquity by Snellen’s chart and colour vision by Ishihara 38 plate edition. Children with visual acquity less than 6/9 were dilated using 2% homatropine eye drops, complete mydriasis was achieved following which retinoscopy was done. The Statistical analysis was performed by using “descriptive and inferential statistics” using “chi-square test” and software used in the analysis were “SPSS 24.0 version” and “GraphPad Prism 7.0 version” and the p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Children in the study group were in the range of twelve to fifteen years. About 55.49 percent of the children were males in the study group, 88.67% belonged to upper high socioeconomic status. Only 18.61% of children had a refractive error. Prevalence of myopia was 59.01% followed by astigmatism (26.71%), and hypermetropia (14.29%). The number of cases of refractive errors increased with advancing age. There was no significant association between gender and refractive error. About 60.87% of the children with refractive errors complained of blurring of vision and 28.57% complained of headache. A total of 85.75% of the children with refractive errors in present study were not wearing spectacles. It was observed that 1.62% had colour blindness. Among protans, 1.045% were male, and 0.35% were females. Among deutans 0.23% were male children.

Conclusion

Inspite of refractive error being reversible cause of blindness, we see that uncorrected refractive error is still rampant, even in areas with families of good socio-economic status. This is alarming and it highlights the need to strengthen the existing screening programs.

Introduction

One of God’s most precious gift to humankind is his vision. The eventual moulding of a person’s potentiality lies in his nature, his environments and the quality of his eyesight. Childhood is the formative period which determines one’s physical, intellectual and behavioural pattern. Any problem in vision during these years can hamper the performance of a child in future [1]. Refractive error is an optical system defect intrinsic to the eye, which precludes the light from getting focussed at the retina; thus, reducing normal vision [2]. Refractive error which is left uncorrected is the prime cause of subnormal vision across the world and the second cause of “treatable blindness” [3,4]. It was observed that about 2.3 billion people around the world have refractive errors. Out of these, only few ie 1.8 billion have access to an ophthalmologist for consultation and its correction which leaves around 500 million people, mostly in developing countries, with uncorrected refractive error [5]. Strikingly, 12.8 million are visually impaired because of refractive errors in 5-15-year-old children [6]. Children adapt to the subnormal eyesight by sitting close to the blackboard, keeping their books closer to the eyes while reading, squeesing their eyes and ultimately ignoring work which requires visual concentration. Neither are children mature enough to indicate their difficulties related to vision at an early stage nor the parents are able to notice the gradual development of the refractive error; hence screening is essential [7]. It secondarily has a significant effect on a child’s future employment, earning capacity, family and community, ultimately affecting the growth of a country as a whole.

It is a priority on the global level to undertake an initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness by WHO: VISION 2020- The Right to Sight [8,9].

Another essential problem often left ignored, which must be looked into in these formative years, is of Colour Blindness. Congenital cases are usually X linked recessive, hence seen mostly in males [10]. Colour-blind people are usually unaware of their defect and they adapt to the environment [11]. Its early detection will allow the parents and teachers to make necessary alterations in teaching [12]. This study can help to plan a practical approach and tackle the burden of readily correctable refraction problems in children of 6-15 years of age group and it can also raise awareness regarding the current statistics on the burden of refractive error and colour blindness in school-going children in this area. Hence, the present study was carried out with an aim to find the prevalence of refractive error among school-going children between 6 to 15 years of age group in Wardha, to find out the different forms of refractive error among the study group, and to find out the prevalence of colour blindness in the study group.

Materials and Methods

A Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2017-August 2019 in six co-educational schools of Wardha district in which school camps were organised and students of age 6-15 years and of classes 1st to 10th standard participated. Wardha district comprises of 8 Tehsils (Ashti, Karanja, Arvi, Seloo, Wardha, Deoli, Hinganghat, Samudrapur). Population or Wardha District: is 1,300,774 (total population, including institutional and household population). The population of Urban Wardha being-106,444. The Sex Ratio Of Wardha District is 946 [13]. The institutional ethics committee approved the study (IEC Clearance number: DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2017-18/6659) and Prewritten informed consent forms explaining the nature of study and requirement for mydriasis if the subnormal vision was diagnosed was distributed to the parents before the camps were conducted. However, all students were screened according to the school health camp.

Inclusion Criteria

School going children of age 6 years-15 years who were randomly selected and whose parents or legal guardians were ready to give informed consent. The co-educational schools in the study were randomly selected to ensure adequate representation of population.

Exclusion Criteria

Five-year-old children as they tend to be uncooperative for the visual acuity test as suggested by the study on a refractive error by Dandona R et al., were excluded and non-cooperative child, children with conditions that affect visual functions other than refractive errors like: Corneal opacities and Cataracts, ocular injuries and Ptosis were also excluded [14]. Taking 10.12% as prevalence of refractive error with reference to a study performed by Deshpande Jayant D and Malathi K where they studied the prevalence of ocular morbidities among school children in North and according to it a sample size of 725 patients was needed and present study targeted 865 participants [15].

The list of all students was taken from attendance register along with age, address, parents occupation. All students aged 6-15 years from the selected class, except those who were absent were screened. Children were inquired regarding present and past ophthalmological complaints. Torchlight examination was performed. Snellen’s chart was used to take visual acuity for distance. Visual acuity testing for near vision was done by Jaeger’s chart. Colour vision was taken using Ishihara chart (38 plate version) in a well-illuminated room at a distance of 75 centimetres [16]. Visual acuity of students already wearing glasses was also taken for further improvement. If the vision was less than or equal to 6/9 according to Snellen’s chart, Retinoscopy was performed using a self-illuminating streak retinoscope (HEINE) after mydriasis by homatropine keeping a working distance of 66 cm. A 2% Homatropine (eye drops were put in the conjunctival sac twice (15 minutes apart). If the dilation was not achieved, it was repeated after 30 minutes. Children were re-evaluated for pupillary reaction and dilatation. Cycloplegia considered to be complete if the pupillary dilation was more than 6 mm with no pupillary light reflex. Retinoscopy was then performed by self illuminating streak retinoscope. All children diagnosed to have refractive errors were documented, and different patterns of refractive errors were noted. Refractive error was classified according to the following definitions:

Myopia: Error of at least -0.50D, Hypermetropia of at least +0.50D and Astigmatism ≥0.50 D was considered as visually significant and Visual Impairment was determined based on ICD 10

MVI: moderate visual impairment (<6/18-6/60)

SVI: Severe Visual impairment (<6/60-3/60) [17]

Statistical Analysis

The Statistical analysis was performed by using “descriptive and inferential statistics” using “chi-square test” and software used in the analysis were “SPSS 24.0 version” and “GraphPad Prism 7.0 version” and the p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

The prevalence of refractive error was reported to be 18.61% and the colour blindness as 1.62%. In 6-8 years, 127 (14.68%) were males, 120 (13.87%) were females; 9-11 years group had 148 (17.11%) males and 118(13.64%) females and among 12-15 years children, 205 (23.70%) males and 147 (16.99%) females. Mean age group of population under study was 10.53±2.85 years, males being 10.63±2.84 years and females 10.39±2.87 years [Table/Fig-1].

Age and gender-wise distribution of population screened.

The prevalence of colour blindness in present study was 1.62% and among protans, 1.045% were male, and 0.35% were females. Among deutans 0.23% were male children [Table/Fig-2].

Distribution of colour vision among cases.

Out of the total of 865 students screened, 704 (81.39%) had Emmetropia, and 161 (18.61%) had Ametropia. Maximum students (88.67%) belonged to class I according to Modified Prasad scale [18], followed by class II (8.21%) and then class I (3.12%). In our study, out of 161 patients who had a refractive error, 95 (59.01%) children had Myopia, 43 (26.71%) children had Astigmatism and 23 (14.29%) children had Hypermetropia [Table/Fig-3].

Age and refractive errors.

Refractive errors6-8 years9-11 years12-15 yearsTotal
Myopia6197095 (59.01%)
Hypermetropia69823 (14.29%)
Astigmatism6132443 (26.71%)
Total18 (11.18%)41 (25.47%)102 (63.35%)161 (100%)

Value of χ2: 29.49; p-value: 0.0001; Significant


The number of cases of refractive errors increased with advancing age. Myopia was the most predominant type of refractive error in all the age groups and the results were statistically significant [Table/Fig-3].

There was no significant association between gender and refractive error [Table/Fig-4].

Gender and refractive errors.

Refractive errorsMaleFemaleTotal
Myopia514495 (59.01%)
Hypermetropia16723 (14.29%)
Astigmatism232043 (26.71%)
Total90 (55.90%)71 (44.10%)161 (100%)

Value of χ2: 4.07; p-value: 0.13; Not Significant


Majority of children diagnosed to have refractive errors were categorised as having no visual impairment and 2.48% of children were categorised as blind (<3/60) [Table/Fig-5].

Distribution of cases of refractive errors according to visual impairment.

Visual impairmentNo. of CasesPercentage
6/6-6/18 (Normal)8653.42
<6/18-6/60 (MVI)5131.68
<6/60-3/60 (SVI)2012.42
<3/60 (Blind)42.48
Total161100

Majority of children with refractive errors complained of blurring of vision. By applying the chi-square test of the difference between two proportions, the proportion of cases with the blurring of vision was found to be significantly higher than other symptoms (p<0.01) [Table/Fig-6].

Distribution of cases of refractive error as per symptoms.

SymptomsNo. of patientsPercentage
Blurring of vision9860.87
Headache4628.57
Eyestrain31.86
Pain in/around the eye74.35
Diplopia/Polyopia10.62
Watering63.73

It was observed that only 17 children with myopia, 1 with hypermetropia and 5 with astigmatism were using spectacle, i.e., total 23(14.29%) were using spectacle [Table/Fig-7].

Refractive errors and history of (H/O) wearing spectacles.

Refractive errorsH/O wearing spectaclesNo. H/O wearing spectaclesTotal
Myopia177895 (59.01%)
Hypermetropia12223 (14.29%)
Astigmatism53843 (26.71%)
Total23 (14.29%)138 (85.71%)161 (100%)
χ2-value6.22, p-value=0.044, Significant

Discussion

There is a massive ice berg of refractive errors and colourblindness in present study population. Most of the children in the study group were in the range of twelve to fifteen years (40.69%). This is similar to study by Saha M et al., [19]. Among all the study participants, maximum patients did not have a refractive error. Only 18.61% of children had a refractive error. Seema S et al., conducted a study in Haryana where prevalence of refractive error in 6-15-year-old was 13.65% and Singh V et al., in West Uttar Pradesh observed 17.36% prevalence the results of which were similar to the current study [20,21]. Among a total of 161 children diagnosed with refractive error, maximum children had myopia (59.01%) followed by astigmatism (26.71%), and the least number of children had hypermetropia (14.29%). Studies which shows the different pattern of refractive errors is tabulated in [Table/Fig-8] [22-28].

Comparison of pattern of refractive errors in various studies [22-28].

Name of the studyMyopiaHypermetropiaAstigmatism
Present study59.01%14.29%26.71%
Sarma KD et al., [22]81.92%3.91%).14.89%
Pavithra MB et al., [23]62.9%14.4%22.7%
Sethi S and Kartha GP [24]63.5%11.2%20.4%
Ali ABM et al., [25]53%9.3%22.9%
Warad C et al., [26]82.67%9.3%,7.9%
Kawuma M and Mayeku R [27]11%37%52%
Chatterjee S et al., [28]58.217.7%16.3%
Samant PL et al., [29]78.57%21.43%-

The number of cases of refractive errors increased with advancing age. Myopia was the most predominant type of refractive error in all the age groups. Patil M et al., reported that maximum refractive error was in age group of 10-12 years [30]. Singh H, found it most commonly in the age group of 8-10 years [31] and Padhye AS et al., found them in 9-12 years [32]. Sun JT et al., found in their study that the prevalence of myopia in children increased with increasing age and that girls were no more likely to suffer from myopia than boys [33]. Theophanous C et al., concluded that the prevalence of myopia increased with age [34]. These results are comparable to present study.

There was no significant association between gender and refractive error according to present study. In a study by Patil M et al., also no significant association was found between refractive errors and sex, also it was found that 94% of children had no visual impairment [30]. In a similar study in central India by Singh H, 28.78% of children had Visual aquity between 6/24 to 6/60 and 5.67% had <6/60 [31]. The results of these studies are in agrrement with the current study. Majority of the children with refractive errors in current study were not wearing spectacles (85.71%). Sarma KD and Krishantreya M, observed 75.53 % of cases of ammetropia were detected during the study, out of which only 24.47% were already wearing spectacles [22]. Prema N in the study noted that only 7% of students with poor vision used eyeglasses [35].

It was observed in present study that 1.62% of children had colour blindness. Among protans, 1.045 % were male, and 0.35% were females. Among deutans 0.23 % were male children. Reddy AV et al., conducted a study in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh and concluded that the prevalence of colour blindness was 1.9% out of which 1.71% were males and 0.184% females. Among them, 90.3% were protanopes, 9.7% were deuteranopes, and none were tritanope [36]. According to Agrawal S and Bansod N, 2.02% were colour blind which includes 11 boys (3.16%) and 1 girl (0.40%) and out of them 2.87% of boys had deuteranomaly, and one boy (0.29%) showed protanomaly [37]. These results are similar to present study.

Limitation(s)

In present study right, and left eyes are not being compared separately. Present study is a cross-sectional one, hence determination of temporal associations among various variables in the study was not done. Only protanopes and deuteranopes was identified by Ishihara chart. Amblyopia and squint can be associated with refractive error, but these are not included in the study. It is a school-based survey and only six schools were surveyed. Hence study should also be undertaken on a larger scale in future.

Conclusion(s)

It was concluded that inspite of being an urban area with good literacy rate and maximum population belonging to class I socioeconomic status, 61% of students with refractive error out of which 85.71% were not using spectacles and 2.48% were even categorised as blind. This is alarming as refractive error is a treatable cause of blindness. This can be accounted on the lack of awareness regarding symptoms of refractive error and importance of early diagnosis and treatment.

Value of χ2: 29.49; p-value: 0.0001; SignificantValue of χ2: 4.07; p-value: 0.13; Not Significant

References

[1]GLOBALDATAFINALforweb.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/blindness/GLOBALDATAFINALforweb.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[2]Koroye-Egbe A, Ovenseri-Ogbomo G, Adio AO, Refractive error status in Bayelsa state, Nigeria Nigerian Journal of Ophthalmology 2010 18(2):57-61.10.4314/njo.v18i2.70764  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[3]Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Vilas K, Prasad MN, Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001 42(5):908-16.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, Schlenther G, Naidoo KS, Resnikoff S, Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error Bull World Health Organ 2012 90(10):728-38.10.2471/BLT.12.10403423109740  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Holden BA, Sulaiman S, Knox K, The challenge of providing spectacles in the developing world Community Eye Health 2000 13(33):09-10.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP, Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004 Bull World Health Organ 2008 86(1):63-70.10.2471/BLT.07.04121018235892  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Yingyong P, Refractive errors survey in primary school children (6-12-year-old) in 2 provinces: Bangkok and Nakhonpathom (one year result) J Med Assoc Thai m2010 93(10):1205-10.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Thylefors B, A global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness Community Eye Health 1998 11(25):110.1016/S0002-9394(99)80239-6  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[9]Pararajasegaram R, VISION 2020 The Right to Sight: From strategies to action Am J ophthalmol 1999 128:359-60.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Simunovic MP, Colour vision deficiency Eye 2010 24(5):747-55.10.1038/eye.2009.25119927164  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Cole BL, Assessment of inherited colour vision defects in clinical practice Clinical and Experimental Optometry 2007 90(3):157-75.10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00135.x17425762  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Rigaudiere F, Leid J, Vienot F, Le JG, Neurophysiological basis and clinical tests for assessment of X-linked color vision deficiencies in school children Journal Francais D’ophtalmologie 2006 29(1):87-102.10.1016/S0181-5512(06)73755-X  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Wise T. DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK. Available from: http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/2708_PART_B_DCHB_%20WARDHA.pdf. :276  [Google Scholar]

[14]Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Sahare P, Narsaiah S, Munoz SR, Refractive error in children in a rural population in India Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2002 43(3):615-22.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Deshpande Jayant D, Malathi K, Prevalence of ocular morbidities among school children in rural area of North Maharashtra in India Natl J Community Med 2011 2:302-04.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Woldeamanuel GG, Geta TG, Prevalence of color vision deficiency among school children in Wolkite, Southern Ethiopia BMC Research Notes 2018 11(1):01-05.10.1186/s13104-018-3943-z30486898  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]World Health Organization. Prevention of blindness & deafness. Consultation on development of standards for characterization of visual loss and visual function [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 4-5 september 2003. WHO/PBL/03. 91). [cited 2010 Nov 20]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc. who. int/hq/2003/WHO/PBL/03.91.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[18]Pandey VK, Aggarwal P, Kakkar R, Modified BG Prasad Socio-economic Classification, Update-2019 Indian J Comm Health 2019 31(1):123-25.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Saha M, Ranjan A, Islam MN, Mukherji S, Prevalence of refractive errors among the school going children at a tertiary center of West Bengal International Journal of Scientific Study 2017 5(4):179-82.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Seema S, Vashisht BM, Meenakshi K, Manish G, Magnitude of refractive errors among school children in a rural block of Haryana The Internet Journal of Epidemiology 2009 6(2):1540-2614.10.5580/1e5f  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[21]Singh V, Malik KP, Malik VK, Jain K, Prevalence of ocular morbidity in school going children in West Uttar Pradesh Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2017 65(6):50010.4103/ijo.IJO_676_1528643716  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Sarma KD, Krishnatreya M, A Study on refractive errors among the school children of Guwahati City International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2016 3(8):2258-60.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Pavithra MB, Maheshwaran R, Sujatha R, A study on the prevalence of refractive errors among school childern of 7-15 years age group in the field practice areas of a medical college in Bangalore Int J Med Sci Public Health 2013 2(3):641-45.10.5455/ijmsph.2013.220420131  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Sethi S, Kartha GP, Prevalence of refractive errors in school children (12-17 years) of Ahmedabad City Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2000 25(4):181  [Google Scholar]

[25]Ali ABM, Talha AK, Elmadina AEM, Refractive errors status among children examined at optical center in Khartoum state Sudanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2016 8(1):10-13.10.4103/1858-540X.184236  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[26]Warad C, Suranagi PV, Poornima N, Prevalence of refractive errors among school children in and around Davangere Journal of Public Health and Medical Research 2014 2(2):28-31.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Kawuma M, Mayeku R, A survey of the prevalence of refractive errors among children in lower primary schools in Kampala district African Health Sciences 2002 2(2):69-72.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Chatterjee S, Biswas D, Kumar J, Prevalence of refractive errors in school children in the urban population of Kolkata, India: A prospective study Int J Res Health Sci 2014 2:1185-87.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Samant PL, Bangal SV, Giri PA, Bhandari AJ, Refractive errors as a cause of childhood blindness in school going children of a rural set-up International Journal of Healthcare and Biomedical Research 2015 3(03):45-51.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Patil M, Mehta R, Dhamdhere I, Study of prevalence and socio-demographic features of refractive error in children attending secondary school Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2016 2(1):68-71.10.5958/2395-1451.2016.00019.620142964  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Singh H, Pattern of ocular morbidity in school children in central India Strabismus 2011 63(2. 08):00-30.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Padhye AS, Khandekar R, Dharmadhikari S, Dole K, Gogate P, Deshpande M, Prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and other eye problems among urban and rural school children Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2009 16(2):69-74.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Sun JT, An M, Yan XB, Li GH, Wang DB, Prevalence and related factors for myopia in school-aged children in Qingdao [Internet] Journal of Ophthalmology 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 6] Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/joph/2018/9781987/10.1155/2018/978198729507811  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Theophanous C, Modjtahedi BS, Batech M, Marlin DS, Luong TQ, Fong DS, Myopia prevalence and risk factors in children Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ) 2018 12:158110.2147/OPTH.S16464130214142  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[35]Prema N, Prevalence of refractive error in school children Indian Journal of Science and Technology 2011 4(9):1160-61.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Reddy AV, Babu GR, Prasad KV, Prevalence of colour blindness in school children in Guntur city, Andhra Pradesh International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2017 4(11):2266-68.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Agarwal S, Bansod N, Prevalence of color blindness in school children Int J of Sci Res 2014 3(4):175-76.  [Google Scholar]