Physiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/43225.13524
Year : 2020 | Month : Feb | Volume : 14 | Issue : 02 Page : CC06 - CC08

Maximum Oxygen Consumption (VO2 max) Estimation using Direct and Indirect Method in Indian Population: A Pilot Study

Karampreet Kour Buttar1, Neha Saboo2, Sudhanshu Kacker3

1 Student, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
3 Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Neha Saboo, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: nehasaboo8@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) has been considered the single best indicator of the cardio respiratory fitness. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is the maximum amount of oxygen a person can intake and utilise during intense exercise.

Aim

To estimate and compare VO2 max measured by using direct and indirect methods.

Materials and Methods

A prospective cross-divtional pilot study in which total of 100 apparently healthy students (male and female) were recruited from RUHS-College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur from January 2019 to August 2019. VO2 max of each participant was determined. Direct estimation of VO2 max comprised of sub-maximal exercise test on treadmill using gas analyser whereas VO2 max was indirectly predicted by standard protocol of Queen College step Test (QCT) with a gap of four days in between the tests. Collected data were entered in Microsoft-Excel and Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis of data.

Results

The mean value of VO2 max (mL/kg/min) using direct method was 44.66±9.25 and that of using indirect method was 48.00±8.02. There was statistically very significant difference between two methods of VO2 max estimation (p=0.0032). Mean value of VO2 max for males was 47.56±8.37 mL/kg/min and for females it was 37.62±7.40 mL/kg/min, which was found statistically significant (p=0.0001) higher in males than in females.

Conclusion

From the present investigation it may be concluded that the actual VO2 max is lower than the predicted VO2 max from the QCT which suggest that the prediction equation is not applicable to the studied population due to difference of ethnicity. With the help of estimated VO2 max we can find out physical fitness in individuals and creating awareness about physical activity and life style modification for primary prevention of cardiovascular, metabolic and mental disorders.

Introduction

Physical fitness refers to person’s ability to work effectively, enjoy leisure time, be healthy, resist hypo-kinetic disease or condition and meet emergency situations. There are many factors which help to develop physical fitness, but regular physical activity is the key aspect to achieve optimal physical fitness [1]. In current scenario, the Cardio Respiratory Fitness (CRF) is regarded the most important health fitness parameter. The CRF or maximal aerobic power is the overall capacity of the cardiovascular and respiratory system and the ability to carry out prolonged strenuous exercise. The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) attained during a graded maximal exercise till voluntary exhaustion has been considered the single best indicator of the cardio-respiratory fitness [2].

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) is one of the most commonly used parameter in exercise science for Cardio-respiratory fitness measurement. Firstly, Hill AV and Lupton H reported that there exists a limited rate of maximal oxygen transport from the environment to the mitochondria to support oxidative production of energy to do strenuous work [3]. Maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max) is the maximum amount of oxygen can be taken-up and utilised by the person body during heavy exercise [4]. VO2 maximum is considered as the gold standard to assess the cardio-respiratory endurance of the patient. People who possess a low VO2 max have an increased chance of premature death, as well as the development of numerous chronic diseases, whereas individuals with a high VO2 max have less chance of developing chronic diseases, all-cause mortality, and coronary artery disease [4]. The VO2max can be estimated using maximal or sub-maximal tests, by direct or indirect methods. Direct measurement of VO2 max using Gas analyser and step and Field tests are used for indirect measurement of VO2 max [5].

The primary criteria for VO2 max is a plateau in VO2 despite increased exercise intensity [6]. In the case of a plateau in VO2 not being reached many secondary criteris including a rise in Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER) above 1.15, blood lactate concentration above 8 mmol/L and increase in predicted heart rate according to age (i.e., 220-Age) [7].

In India, indirect method (QCT) is being used very frequently to estimate VO2 max due to its easy, safe, quick and feasible approach. As originally QCT was developed for Caucasian population, which is different from Indian population in terms of ethnicity. Few studies [8,9] done in India showed variation in value of VO2 max measured by using direct and indirect both methods. So the accuracy and applicability of QCT (indirect method) in Indian population is still to be defined. Hence, this study was designed to estimate and compare VO2 max measured by using direct and indirect methods.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective cross-sectional pilot study, approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur. (Approval letter no RUHS-CMS/Ethics Comm/2018/148 dated-21/12/18) and conducted from January 2019 to August 2019.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 100 apparently healthy young medical students (Pilot-study) of both gender, aged between 18-25 years were recruited randomly for the study after obtaining their consent form.

Exlusion criteria: Individuals suffering from Hypertension, Diabetes, Cardiac, Respiratory and musculoskeletal disorders, Smokers, alcoholic and history of hospitalisation in the last 3 months were excluded.

Everything was explained to students regarding aim of the study and how the procedure will be performed. All the students were tested under similar laboratory conditions (27-29°C temperature and relative humidity ranging between 75%-80%). Subjects were also instructed not to have heavy meals/tea/coffee at least 2 hours and not have performed any exercise before the test. Detailed history was taken and clinical examination was done. The Anthropometric data which included age, height, weight, skin-fold thickness was measured as accordance to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) [10] and Body Mass Index (BMI) and body fat percentage [11] were calculated.

VO2 max using direct method Analog-Digital (AD) instrument gas analyser (model-ML206): Test protocol was explained to the subject and demonstrated the same. The subject was made to wear the mask which is in turn was connected to the equipment to measure the total amount of gases inhaled and exhaled during the test. Now we started the test procedure i.e.,. the treadmill graded exercise test protocol, in which subject was asked to walk for 3 minutes at level grade followed by jogging at self selected speed (b/w 4.3-7.5 mph) at level grade for 3 minutes and then with a constant speed, treadmill grade was increased by 2.5% every minute until the subject achieves fatigue and is unable to continue the exercise. Here, during the procedure, the equipment was connected to a monitor screen, which showed us various values e.g., Volume of Oxygen (VO2), Volume of Carbon-dioxide (VCO2), Resting Energy Expenditure (REE), Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER), Metabolic Equivalent of Tasks (METs) etc., of every 10 seconds [12].

VO2 max using indirect method (QCT) [13]: Test protocol was explained to the subject and demonstrated the same. The subject was then asked to rest in a supine posture for 30 min. The resting heart rate and the blood pressure were measured. The height of the step is to be kept at 16.25 inches and the stepping cadence is to be set at:

Male: 24 cycles/min Female: 22 cycles/min

Since there are 4 steps in each cycle, the metronome (electrical device that produce a regular repeated sound) is to be set at 88 ticks/min for females or 96 ticks/min for males. The stepping protocol was followed as: both feet on the ground, first foot on the step, step-up with the second foot on the step, both foot on the step, first foot back on the ground, and finally the second foot on the ground. The subject was asked to perform the test for 3 min. At the end of the test, the subject has to remain standing and the number of heart beats between the 5th and 20th second after the cessation of the test, is to be noted down. The pulse rate per minutes is calculated by multiplying it by a factor of 4. This is used to predict the VO2 max by using the following formula [13].

Male: VO2 max(mL/kg/min)=111.33-(0.42×pulse rate in beats/min)

Female: VO2 max(mL/kg/min)=65.81-(0.1847×pulse rate in beats/min)

Statistical Analysis

Collected data were entered in Microsoft-Excel (version-16) and Unpaired and Paired t-test was used to compare VO2 max results measured by using direct and indirect methods.

Results

The study was conducted on 100 apparently healthy students (65 males and 35 females). Paired t-test was used to compare VO2 max results measured by using direct and indirect methods. [Table/Fig-1] showed that Mean value of VO2 max for males was 47.56±8.37 mL/kg/min and for females it was 37.62±7.40 mL/kg/min, which was found significantly higher in males than in females (p<0.0001).

Age, BMI and Body Fat %, GPAQ and VO2 max of male and female subjects.

Males (n=65) (Mean±SD)Females (n=35) (Mean±SD)p-valueInference
Age (Years)20.06±2.0920.09±2.360.9509NS
Weight (Kg)63.84±11.0954.43±11.03<0.0001HS
Height (cm)171.81±5.87158.14±6.66<0.0001HS
BMI (Kg/m2)21.64±3.5421.60±4.000.9620NS
Body Fat %15.63±4.7526.73±4.19<0.0001HS
GPAQ (METs)1576±915937.14±503.730.0002VS
VO2 max (mL/kg/min)47.56±8.3737.62±7.40<0.0001HS

p-value: Probability-value; NS: Non significant; HS: Highly significant; VS: Very significant; BMI: Body mass index; Unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between male and female; VO2: Volume of oxygen; SD: Standard deviation; METs: Metabolic equivalent of tasks


[Table/Fig-2] showed that the mean value of VO2 max (mL/kg/min) using direct method was 44.66±9.25 and that of using indirect method was 48.00±8.02. There was statistically very significant difference between two methods of VO2 max estimation (p=0.0032).

Comparison of Vo2 max using Direct and indirect method in male and female subjects.

VO2 max (mL/kg/min) using direct methodVO2 max (mL/kg/min) using Indirect method
Mean±SDMean±SDp-valueInference
Males47.56±8.3750.86±7.390.0070VS
Females37.62±7.4040.83±4.150.0304S
Overall44.66±9.2548.00±8.020.0032VS

p-value: Probability-value; S: Significant; VS: very significant; Paired t test was used; SD: Standard deviation


Discussion

VO2 max measurement using gas analyser has been used as the gold standard method for assessing cardio-respiratory fitness. Queen college step test was originally formulated for Caucasian population but is being widely used for measuring VO2 max even in Indian population, which differs from the ethnicity of Caucasian population. The present study measured Cardio-respiratory fitness by estimating VO2 max and compared the result of VO2 max obtained using direct (Gas Analyser) and indirect method (QCT), were found statistically very significant (p=0.0032). The actual VO2 max is lower than the predicted VO2 max from the QCT which suggest that the prediction equation is not found to be applicable to the studied population. In earlier studies, Chattarji S et al., reported that original predictive equation of QCT cannot be applied on Indian population due to difference of VO2 max value using direct and indirect method [8,9].

In this present study, the mean value of VO2 max for males was 47.56±8.37 mL/kg/min and for females was 37.62±7.40 mL/kg/min, which was significantly high in males (p<0.0001). Findings of this study are in agreement with other studies [14,15]. Modala S et al., in their study found that the mean value of VO2 max was 51.76±3.8 in males and 44.07±4.2 in females [15]. Bandyopadhyay A and Bandyopadhyay P reported that males have superiority than their female counterpart [16]. The males are higher to females in cardio-respiratory fitness because, lower fat percentage and others factors mainly linked to the cardiac size and oxygen-carrying capacity (i.e., left ventricular inner diastolic diameter, maximal heart rate (HR max) and maximal stroke volume) [17], The reason for reduced VO2 max in the female subjects of the present study, than the male subjects could be because of the significantly decreased physical activity level and significant higher level of body fat percentage.

On comparison of the VO2 max value in the present study with the standard VO2 max classification, this study subjects fitted in the category of good on cardio-respiratory fitness (VO2 max) scale [18]. Mean body fat percentage of males was 15.63±4.75 and for females it was 26.73±4.19, which was found statistically significantly higher in females than in males (p<0.001). These results are consistent with the findings of several studies in the literature [19,20]. Sharma M et al., reported a high negative correlation between VO2 max and body fat percent in healthy males [19]. Mondal H and Mishra SP, also reported that increased body fat percentage is associated with decreased level of VO2 max in adults [20]. The assessment of cardio-respiratory fitness is valuable while educating individuals about their overall fitness status, developing exercise programs and quantifying cardio-vascular risk.

Limitation(s)

This study is not applicable to all age groups. So, further studies can be done in larger sample size of all age groups and new regression equation should be developed for studied population.

Conclusion(s)

The present study concludes that Direct method of VO2 max using gas analyser provides more valid and accurate result than Indirect method (QCT). This study suggests that QCT in its original form cannot be applied in this study population. QCT is quickest, easiest and safest as well as feasible way to measure until a new modified equation is developed to measure VO2 max for this studied population.

p-value: Probability-value; NS: Non significant; HS: Highly significant; VS: Very significant; BMI: Body mass index; Unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between male and female; VO2: Volume of oxygen; SD: Standard deviation; METs: Metabolic equivalent of tasksp-value: Probability-value; S: Significant; VS: very significant; Paired t test was used; SD: Standard deviation

References

[1]Casperson CJ, Kenneth EP, Christenson GM, Physical Activity, Exercise, and Physical Fitness: Definitions and Distinctions for Health-Related Research Public Health Report 1985 100(2):126-31.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Mitchell HW, Peter H B, ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 2005 7th edition:55-89.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Hill AV, Lupton H, Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen Q J Med 1923 16(62):135-71.10.1093/qjmed/os-16.62.135  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Bassett DR, Howley ET, Limiting factor for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance Med Sci Sport Exerc 2000 32(1):70-84.10.1097/00005768-200001000-0001210647532  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J, The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness J Sports Sci 1988 6(2):93-101.10.1080/026404188087298003184250  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Carter J G, Brooks K A, Sparks JR, Comparison of the YMCA cycle sub-maximal VO2 max test to a treadmill Vo2 max test Int J Exer Sci 2011 5(2):121-29.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Shephard RJ, Tests of maximum oxygen intake a critical review Sports Med 1984 1(2):99-124.10.2165/00007256-198401020-000026385195  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P, Mukherjee PS, Bandyopadhyay A, Validity of Queen’s college step test for use with young Indian men Br J Sports Med 2004 38(3):289-91.10.1136/bjsm.2002.00221215155428  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P, Bandhoupadhyay A, Validity of Queen’s college step test for estimation of maximum oxygen uptake in female students Indian J Med Res 2005 121(1):32-35.  [Google Scholar]

[10]National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)- Anthropometry Procedure Manual, January 2007  [Google Scholar]

[11]Durnin J, Womersley J, Body fat percentage assessed from total body density and its estimation from skin fold thickness: Measurement on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years Br J Nutrition 1974 32(1):77-97.10.1079/BJN197400604843734  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Verhs PR, Geordge JD, Gilbert WF, Sharon AP, Kymberli DA, Sub maximal treadmill exercise test to predict VO2 max in fit adults Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 2007 11(2):61-72.10.1080/10913670701294047  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P, Bandyopadhyay A, Prediction of maximal oxygen consumption from body mass, height and body surface area in young sedentary subjects Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2006 50(2):181-86.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Nitin YM, Sucharita S, Madhura M, Thomas T, Sandhya TA, VO2 max in an Indian population: A study to understand the role of factors determining vo2 max Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 2013 57(2):87-94.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Modala S, Kumar PS, Sugunakar M, Pradeep KBJ, Prediction of maximal oxygen consumption using bicycle ergometer among males and females in GSL student Int J Basic Applied Med Sci 2015 5(1):271-75.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Bandyopadhyay A, Bandyopadhyay P, Cardiorespiratory fitness in college students of Uttar Pradesh, India J of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy 2007 3(1):44-47.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Marta CC, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Izquierdo M, Marques MC, Physical Fitness differences between prepubescent boys and girls J Strength Cond Res 2011 26(7):1756-66.10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825bb4aa22561975  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Heyward VH, Gibson AL, Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise Prescription Human Kinetics 2014 7th edition:81-84.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Sharma M, Kamal RB, Chawla K, Correlation of body composition to aerobic capacity; A cross sectional study Int J App Res 2016 2(1):38-42.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Mondal H, Mishra SP, Effect of BMI, body fat percentage and fat free mass on maximal oxygen consumption in healthy young adults J Clin Diagn Res 2017 11(6):17-20.10.7860/JCDR/2017/25465.1003928764152  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]