Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/42751.13435
Year : 2020 | Month : Jan | Volume : 14 | Issue : 01 Page : OD09 - OD11

Marine-Lenhart Syndrome- A Curious Case of Thyrotoxicosis

Swayamsidha Mangaraj1, Vaibhav Pathak2, Rukma Narkar3, Arun Kumar Choudhury4, Anoj Kumar Baliarsinha5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Endocrinology, IMS & SUM Medical College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
2 Senior Resident, Department of Endocrinology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
3 Senior Resident, Department of Endocrinology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
5 Professor and Head, Department of Endocrinology, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Swayamsidha Mangaraj, Mishra Colony, Near Andhra Bank, Mangalabag, Cuttack-753001, Odisha, India.

Hyperthyroidism is one of the common prevalent endocrine problems. The common causes of hyperthyroidism include Graves’ disease, toxic nodular goiter and toxic adenoma. The diagnosis is usually straightforward but can be challenging at times. Marine-Lenhart syndrome refers to the rare co-existence of hyperfunctioning nodule in presence of Graves’ disease. The disease can easily be misdiagnosed if clinical vigil is not high. The disease differs from classical Graves’ disease in terms of clinical course, management modality and outcome. Here we present a case of 52 years old female with complaints of weight loss, excessive sweating, tremors and palpitation for last six months and swelling in antrior aspect of neck for last four months. Technetium 99 m thyroid scintigraphy showed presence of diffuse increased tracer uptake 15% with suppression of background activity. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of Marine-Lenhart syndrome was made. Early and corrected identification of this rare variant is essential for proper therapeutic management.

Case Report

A 52-year-old female presented with symptoms of weight loss, excessive sweating, tremors and palpitation for last six months. She had also noticed swelling in anterior aspect of neck for last four months. She did not have any prior history of thyroid related illness, neck surgery or irradiation. There was no history of thyroid disorders among family members. She was lean (body mass index -19.4 kg/m2). There was presence of tachycardia (heart rate- 110/min). A grade 2 firm and non tender goiter was palpable. Furthermore, a nodule of approximate size 1×2 cm was palpable over isthmus and adjacent right lobe of thyroid. There was no appreciable bruit heard over the gland. There was no associated cervical lymphadenopathy. There was no evidence of dysphagia or dysphonia. No obvious ophthalmopathy or dermopathy were present. Significant positive findings from systemic examination included presence of fine tremors and increased deep tendon reflexes. Based on frank features of thyrotoxicosis, a thyroid function test was done. The results revealed elevated free triiodothyronine (9.8 pmol/L, normal: 3.1-6.8 pmol/L), elevated free thyroxine (39.2pmol/L, normal: 12-22 pmol/L) and suppressed Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) level (0.048 mIU/mL, normal: 0.4-4.2 mIU/mL). Anti TSH receptor antibody titres were positive 14.4 IU/L (positive >2 IU/L). Complete blood count, liver function tests and renal function tests were within normal limit. Ultrasonography of thyroid showed presence of diffuse thyroid enlargement with heterogeneous parenchyma and increased parenchymal vascularity. Multiple tiny hyoechoic nodules were also noted in thyroid parenchyma. A hypoechoic nodule of size 1.5×2 cm with increased intranodular vascularity (without any microcalcification) was also noted which corresponded to the clinically palpable dominant nodule. Fine needle aspiration cytology from the same nodule did not revealed any features of malignancy. Technetium 99 m thyroid scintigraphy showed presence of diffuse increased tracer uptake 15% (normal: 0.4-1.5%) with suppression of background activity [Table/Fig-1]. A hyperfunctioning nodule with a cold area located superiorly was also noted in isthmus corresponding to clinically palpable nodule [Table/Fig-1]. Based on above findings, a diagnosis of Marine-Lenhart syndrome was made. The patient was started on anti-thyroid drugs namely (carbimazole 30 mg/day) and beta blockers for symptomatic relief. She was rendered euthyroid after three months of anti-thyroid drug treatment. She was counselled regarding role of definitive therapy (radioiodine therapy or total thyroidectomy) for management of her condition. She chose to undergo total thyroidectomy and hence was referred for the same.

Technetium 99m thyroid scan showing diffuse increased tracer uptake in thyroid gland suggestive of hyperfunctioning. Also noted are a hyperfunctioning nodule in region of isthmus (white arrow) and cold area located superiorly (black arrow) suggestive of Marine-Lenhart syndrome.


Graves’ disease and toxic nodular goitre are among the common causes of thyrotoxicosis seen in clinical practice. The two clinical conditions however differ in their clinical course and management strategies. It is well known that Graves’ disease is an autoimmune thyroid disease which is caused due to stimulation of thyroid gland by endogenous production of stimulating TSH receptor antibodies. However, the genesis of autonomously functioning thyroid nodule (Plummer’s disease) is believed due to clonal proliferation of thyroid cells independent of TSH. Hence, the two diseases have distinct aetiopathogenesis. Marine-Lenhart syndrome refers to the rare clinical condition in which Graves’ disease and autonomous functioning nodule coexist [1]. The disease may pose as diagnostic and therapeutic difficulty during evaluation. Its early recognition and differentiation from classical Graves’ disease is essential for treating the condition more effectively.

The first description of the disease dates back to 1911, when the coexistence of Graves’ disease and autonomously functioning thyroid nodule was described for the first time by Marine and Lenhart [2]. In 1972, Charkes ND coined the term Marine-Lenhart syndrome in honor of physicians who were first to describe this entity [1]. In his paper, Charkes ND described 10 patients with Graves’ disease and functioning nodules and also proposed a set of criteria for diagnosis of this disorder. The reported prevalence of such association ranges from 2.7% to 4.1% [1].

Apart from diffuse enlargement of thyroid gland, there is increased prevalence of nodules in thyroid parenchyma in Graves’ disease. The reported prevalence of thyroid nodules in cases of Graves’ disease is around 25-30% [3,4]. The majority of such nodules are hypoactive (more than 95%) and a small fraction remains hyperactive. Hence from a clinical point of view, hyperfunctioning nodules in Graves’ disease contribute and accentuate the degree of thyrotoxicosis. Therefore, thyrotoxicosis in Marine–Lenhart syndrome could be attributed to Graves’ disease in addition to the hyperfunctioning nodule. These nodules could be hyperfunctioning from the beginning or may become so after a variable time period [5-7]. The following criteria have been proposed for diagnosis of Marine-Lenhart syndrome. These include; a) the thyroid scan shows an enlarged gland and one or more poorly functioning nodules; (b) the nodule is TSH-dependent and the peri-nodular tissue is TSH-independent; (c) after endogenous or exogenous TSH stimulation, the return of function can be demonstrated in the nodule; and (d) the nodule is histologically benign [1,8].

Review of the published cases [6-16] of Marine-Lenhart syndrome in literature reveal that nuclear imaging pattern of thyroid gland showed diffuse increased tracer uptake in thyroid gland along with further increased tracer uptake by nodules [6,9]. Initial scintigraphy pattern described in majority of cases include hyperactivity in the thyroid parenchyma with relative hypoactivity (“cold appearing”) in the nodule [6,10-13]. However, cases of Marine-Lenhart syndrome showing increased tracer uptake (“hot appearing”) in these nodules have also been clearly described [6,9,14-16]. Therefore, both cold and hot appearance of these hyperfunctioning nodules has been described in thyroid scintigraphy.

The lack of uptake of tracer in the nodule is attributed to suppression of thyroid tissue within the nodule by over activity of the remaining gland and hence does not take up tracer or radioactive iodine [6]. Therefore, nuclear imaging scan play a pivotal role in identification of this particular subtype of disease. Early identification is also essential for planning appropriate management strategies. Apart from diagnostic dilemma, Marine-Lenhart syndrome also poses a therapeutic challenge to treating physician because this variant is more resistant to radioiodine therapy than conventional Graves’ disease [1,16]. The amount of radioiodine required for treating hyperthyroidism in such patients is higher than doses employed to treat diffuse toxic goiter [16]. An interesting facet is the development of Graves’ disease shortly after radioiodine therapy for autonomously functioning thyroid nodules [17,18].

Another important clinical issue which needs mention is the presence of thyroid malignancy in the nodules reported among patients with Graves’ disease. It has been reported that around 1.1% to 7.1% of patients with Graves’ disease may have concomitant thyroid cancer [19,20]. Majority of thyroid carcinoma arise from cold nodules in such individuals. The most commonly reported variety is the papillary thyroid carcinoma [21]. The presence of papillary thyroid carcinoma has also been reported very rarely in patients with Marine-Lenhart syndrome [13,21]. Some authors have suggested increased aggressiveness of thyroid malignancy associated with Graves’ disease [22,23] but these findings were not replicated by few other authors [24,25].


To conclude, this case report exemplifies the rare occurrence of Marine-Lenhart syndrome as an underlying cause of thyrotoxicosis. Nuclear imaging scan play a pivotal role in recognition of this rare nodular variant of Graves’ disease. It should be remembered that this disease is particularly resistant to radioiodine therapy in contrast to classical Graves’ disease. Hence, knowledge about this rare variant among physicians is essential for early identification and appropriate intervention.


[1]Charkes ND, Graves’ disease with functioning nodules (Marine-Lenhart syndrome) J Nucl Med 1972 13(12):885-92.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Marine D, Lenhart CH, Pathological anatomy of exophthalmic goiter Arch Intern Med 1911 8(3):265-316.10.1001/archinte.1911.00060090002001  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[3]Kim WB, Han SM, Kim TY, Nam-Goong IS, Gong G, Lee HK, Ultrasonographic screening for detection of thyroid cancer in patients with Graves’ disease Clin Endocrinol 2004 60(6):719-25.10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02043.x15163336  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Mishra A, Mishra SK, Thyroid nodules in Graves’ disease: Implications in an endemically iodine deficient area J Postgrad Med 2001 47(4):244-47.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Braga-Basaria M, Basaria S, Marine-Lenhart syndrome Thyroid 2003 13(10):99110.1089/10507250332251141814611710  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Cakir M, Marine-Lenhart syndrome J Natl Med Assoc 2005 97:1036-38.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Cakir M, Diagnosis of Marine-Lenhart syndrome Thyroid 2004 14(7):55510.1089/105072504151699515307948  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Giuffrida G, Giovinazzo S, Certo R, Vicchio TM, Baldari S, Campennì A, An uncommon case of Marine-Lenhart syndrome Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 2014 58(4):398-401.10.1590/0004-273000000317324936736  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Neuman D, Kuker R, Vendrame F, Marine-Lenhart syndrome: Case report, diagnosis, and management Case Rep Endocrinol 2018 2018:326801010.1155/2018/326801030473890  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Mohan JR, Santhosh S, Sood A, Bhattacharya A, Mittall BR, Pertechnetate thyroid scan in Marine-Lenhart syndrome Indian J Nucl Med 2013 28(2):125-26.10.4103/0972-3919.11826124163525  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Harisankar CN, Preethi GR, Chungath BB, Hybrid SPECT/CT evaluation of Marine-Lenhart syndrome Clin Nucl Med 2013 38(2):e89-90.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Brahma A, Beadsmoore C, Dhatariya K, The oldest case of Marine-Lenhart syndrome? JRSM Short Rep 2012 3(4):2110.1258/shorts.2011.01116422715422  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Atmaca H, Çolak R, Yazici ZA, Kefeli M, Tosun FC, Marine-Lenhart syndrome with papillary thyroid carcinoma J Res Med Sci 2015 20(4):412-15.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Sharma A, Marine-Lenhart syndrome in two adolescents, including one with thyroid cancer: A case series and review of the literature J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2017 30(12):1237-43.10.1515/jpem-2017-022329127767  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Uludag M, Aygun N, Ozel A, Yener Ozturk F, Karasu R, Ozguven BY, A rare presentation of autonomously functioning papillary thyroid cancer: Malignancy in Marine-Lenhart syndrome nodule Case Rep Surg 2016 2016:874040510.1155/2016/874040527110424  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Damle N, Mishra R, Identifying Marine-Lenhart syndrome on a 99mTc-pertechnetate thyroid scan Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2013 17(2):36610.4103/2230-8210.10969823776932  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Chiovato L, Santini F, Vitti P, Bendinelli G, Pinchera A, Appearance of thyroid stimulating antibody and Graves’ disease after radioiodine therapy for toxic nodular goiter Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1994 40(6):803-06.10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02516.x8033373  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Schmidt M, Gorbauch E, Dietlein M, Faust M, Stützer H, Eschner W, Incidence of postradioiodine immunogenic hyperthyroidism/Graves’ disease in relation to a temporary increase in thyrotropin receptor antibodies after radioiodine therapy for autonomous thyroid disease Thyroid 2006 16(3):281-88.10.1089/thy.2006.16.28116571091  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Phitayakorn R, McHenry CR, Incidental thyroid carcinoma in patients with Graves’ disease Am J Surg 2008 195(3):292-97.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.00618206132  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Belfiore A, Russo D, Vigneri R, Filetti S, Graves’ disease, thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001 55(6):711-18.10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01415.x11895209  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Scherer T, Wohlschlaeger-Krenn E, Bayerle-Eder M, Passler C, Reiner-Concin A, Krebs M, A case of simultaneous occurrence of Marine-Lenhart syndrome and a papillary thyroid microcarcinoma BMC Endocr Disord 2013 13:1610.1186/1472-6823-13-1623657056  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Belfiore A, Garofalo MR, Giuffrida D, Runello F, Filetti S, Fiumara A, Increased aggressiveness of thyroid cancer in patients with Graves’ disease J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990 70(4):830-35.10.1210/jcem-70-4-8302180978  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Pellegriti G, Belfiore A, Giuffrida D, Lupo L, Vigneri R, Outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer in Graves’ patients J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998 83(8):2805-09.10.1210/jc.83.8.2805  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Hales IB, McElduff A, Crummer P, Clifton-Bligh P, Delbridge L, Hoschl R, Does Graves’ disease or thyrotoxicosis affect the prognosis of thyroid cancer J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992 75(3):886-89.10.1210/jcem.75.3.15173811517381  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Yano Y, Shibuya H, Kitagawa W, Nagahama M, Sugino K, Ito K, Recent outcome of Graves’ disease patients with papillary thyroid cancer Eur J Endocrinol 2007 157(3):25-29.10.1530/EJE-07-013617766715  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]