JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2020/40759.13405
Year : 2020 | Month : Jan | Volume : 14 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : DC01 - DC07

Microbial Flora and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Microorganisms from Asymptomatic Contraceptive Users and Non-Users of Reproductive Age

Adesumbo Idowu Odaranle1, Olufunmiso Olusola Olajuyigbe2, Morenike Olutumbi Adeoye-Isijola3, Otunola Adedayo4, Roger Murugas Coopoosamy5

1 Researcher, Department of Haematology, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria.
2 Lecturer, Department of Microbiology, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
3 Lecturer, Department of Microbiology, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
4 Lecturer, Department of Microbiology, Kwara State University, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.
5 Lecturer, Department of Nature Conservation, Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Olufunmiso Olusola Olajuyigbe, Department of Microbiology, School of Science and Technology, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
E-mail: funmijuyigbe12@yahoo.com
Abstract

Introduction

The use of contraceptives is important in preventing unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. However, the use of various contraceptive methods could expose women to microbial infections.

Aim

To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of microbial flora from vaginal swab of asymptomatic women using different contraceptive methods.

Materials and Methods

In this study, high vaginal swab samples were collected from sexually active 406 women between 20 and 45 years of age. Women who were non-specific user of methods were considered as control group. All participating women had no history of antibiotic use since last 2 weeks from the study period as well as abstained from the same during the study period from June to December 2017. The use of contraceptives among different age groups was determined. The microbial flora of asymptomatic individuals were assessed by direct smear, microscopy examination, bacteriological and biochemical identification of the isolated microorganisms and their susceptibility were carried out on the samples collected. All information collected was compiled and data were analysed using SPSS Software programme.

Results

In this study, 39.4% of the population (n=406) were combined hormonal users. While the percentage of the Intrauterine Device (IUD) users was 27.1% and those of the condom users was 21.2%, the non-specific users were 12.3% of the sampled population. Of the women using different contraceptives, 8.1% (29) women using combined hormonal contraceptives, and 2.53% (9) barrier users, 1.97% IUDs users and only 10% of the 50 women in the control groups had bacterial infection. On the other hand, the distribution of fungal strains isolated from contraceptive users showed that 16.01% (57) IUDs users, 5.7% (23) combined hormonal users, 5.06% (18) barrier users and only 16.0% (8) of the women (n=50) in the control group had fungal infection. The antimicrobial assay showed that more than 90% of P. mirabilis, K. oxytoca, E. coli, Group B beta-haemolytic streptococci and S. aureus were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, P. mirabilis (50%), K. oxytoca (95%), E. coli (96%), H. streptococci (80%) and S. aureus (94%) were susceptible to nitrofurantoin. However, these isolates were highly resistant to ceftazidime, gentamycin, kanamycin, tetracycline, cloxacillin, augmentin, ampicillin and amoxicillin. On the other hand, 80% of the fungal isolates were susceptible to ketoconazole, nystatin (75%), clotrimazole (65%) and fluconazole (60%) but were all resistant to griseofulvin.

Conclusion

This study shows that more strains of bacteria and fungi were isolated from women in ages 31-35 years of women sampled and indicated that the most predominant isolates in asymptomatic individuals using contraceptives were highly resistant to most of the antibiotics used except ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and nitrofurantoin to which they were highly susceptible.

Keywords

Introduction

Family planning and fertility regulation using modern methods of contraception had been identified as an effective means of controlling the problem of unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion [1]. Statistics indicated that, despite the high rate of sexual activity among the young and married women of reproductive age, the current prevalence rate for contraceptive use, 11%-13%, in Nigeria, and many developing countries, is extremely low [2]. Consequently, many unmet needs for contraceptive use include unintended pregnancies and illegal abortions ranging from 18.3% to 64.0% of cases [3]. While female contraceptive methods work differently and affect the quality of vaginal microbial flora both in different population and species variation, hormonal contraceptives such as oestrogen and progestogen pills, depo progestin injection, vaginal ring and hormonal IUD prevent pregnancy by interfering with ovulation and suppress the release of an egg from the ovaries [4]. The methods such as condoms or the diaphragm act as a barrier to reduce the possibility of sperm and egg meeting [5,6] while steroid-based IUDs and oral pills may affect the physiology and host immune responses thereby exposing women to risks of reproductive tract infections [7].

With the current increase in the level of awareness on reproductive health globally, development and introduction of modern contraceptives, establishment of organised family planning and the desire of families to regulate their family sizes for a more healthy life, more women are increasingly taking to various contraceptive use [8,9]. However, Nigerian National Demographic and health Survey data indicated that only about 15% of sexually active Nigerian women practice effective contraception [10,11].

Vagina is crucial in sexual and reproductive health. While healthy vagina is colonised by mutually symbiotic flora of the genus Lactobacillus protecting host from disease and maintaining the acidity of the vaginal pH [12], a disruption of vaginal flora can result in a change in its ecology [13]. While the use of antimicrobial agents, high estrogen content of oral contraceptive and spermicide, alter the pH of the vagina which then alters the ecology of the vaginal flora [14], the use of IUDs can result in production of inflammation and changes in the vaginal epithelium [15] to expose women to microbial infections [16]. Consequently, candidiasis, one of the mucous opportunistic infections of the genital system, may occur as a result of an increase in the level of glycogen which may be a good source of carbon for Candida species to survive and accelerate multiplication of yeast and pseudohyphae [17].

Since vagina is a complicated environment and the use of contraceptives by women is inevitable, certain contraceptive methods have been reported to increase host susceptibility to infections [18] and cause several contraceptive-use related diseases [19]. While candidiasis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Chlamydia trachomatis have been found among oral contraceptive users [14], pelvic inflammatory diseases and reproductive tract infections have been associated with prolonged use of IUDs and other contraceptives [20]. Despite some reports on infectious diseases associated with the use of different contraceptives, there is a dearth of information on the distribution and susceptibility of microbial flora associated with asymptomatic women using different contraceptive methods- oral contraceptive pills [21], intrauterine contraceptive device [22,23], hormonal contraceptive injections [24] and injectables [25] in South West Nigeria.

This study was, therefore, aimed at investigating the microbial flora and antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from vagina of asymptomatic women using different contraceptive methods.

Materials and Methods

Collection Centres

Three family planning centres including family planning clinics at Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Centre for Research in Reproductive Health and Owokoniran Memorial Hospital in Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria, were used for sample collections between June and December, 2017. These centres were selected because they constitute major centers for reproductive health hospitals attending to multi-ethnic groups in the South-western part of Nigeria.

The ethical approval to carry out this prospective study was granted with certificate number OOU/TH/DA 126/250 by Research and Ethics Review Committee of Olabisi Onabanjo Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria.

All volunteer women who were presently following one of the contraceptive methods, sexually active, ages between 20 and 45 years and were not presently on any antibiotics or having history of antibiotics use three weeks prior the sampling periods were selected. Women not using specific contraceptive devices were also taken up for the study as control group. The selected women were given informed consent forms and questionnaires to fill and signed before being accepted for the research purposes.

Sample Collection

High vaginal swab samples were collected. The samples were taken from the cervical canal with sterile cotton swab after cleaning the vaginal area with sterile water and inserting moistened sterile speculum into the cervix. The cotton swabs were gently rotated against the vaginal wall to obtain specimens which were aseptically transferred into the holder, given a numerical labelling before being transferred to the laboratory within two hours of collection for processing.

Direct smear gram stain:

Direct smear of the swab samples were prepared on clean glass slides, allowed to air dry and Gram stained using modified Christian Ham Gram staining method [19] before being examined using oil immersion objective lens (X100) with the condenser iris diaphragm being opened sufficiently to give good contrast.

Wet preparation using normal saline

The vaginal smears were prepared on clean grease free glass slides and a drop of normal saline was added to each smear, mixed thoroughly and covered with cover glass. The prepared wet smear slides were examined using X10 and X40 objective lens for detection of abnormal cells such as pus cells, white blood cells, epithelia, yeast cells and protozoa before being quantified per high power field.

Detection of yeast cells using potassium hydroxide solution

A drop of 30% potassium hydroxide solution was added to vaginal smear on glass slides, mixed and covered with slips. The glass slides were examined using X10 and X40 objective lens for detection of yeast cells. The cells showed oval budding with pseudo-hyphae which was quantified per field viewed.

Bacteriological Examination of Samples

The vaginal swab samples was aseptically streaked on three different culture media including MacConkey agar (LAB M), Chocolate agar containing 10% human blood cells (LAB M) and Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (LAB M). The different agars were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions following good standard laboratory operating procedures. The prepared agar surface were dried at 45°C for 15 minutes prior to use after which the vaginal swab samples were aseptically streaked onto the different agar plates which were labeled according to the numerical identification numbers earlier assigned to swab samples. All the MacConkey agar plates were incubated in an inverted position at 37°C for 24 hours to produce observable growth colonies. Also, all chocolate agar plates were incubated in carbon-dioxide jar at 37°C for 24 hours. Further 24 hours incubation period was allowed for the plates without growth within 24 hours before final results were recorded. Sabouraud dextrose agar plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 hour. Observable colonies on agar plates were subjected to series of bacteriological and biochemical tests performed according to Murray P et al., [26].

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using disc diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer)

The bacterial inocula was prepared in 1% sterile peptone water and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C to produce a slight turbidity that was compared with 0.5 McFarland standards. The adjusted inocula were made into lawn with sterile cotton swabs on dried Mueller-Hinton agar surface. The agar surface was allowed to dry for 15 min before a commercially-prepared Gram negative multi disc containing ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), ceptazidime (30 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (30 μg) and ampicillin (10 μg) was aseptically placed on plates containing Gram negative bacteria while Gram positive multi-disc containing erythromycin (30 μg), cloxacillin (5 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), augmentin (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and tetracycline (10 μg) was aseptically placed on plates containing Gram positive bacteria. The assay was done in duplicate before incubating at 37°C for 24 hours. The inhibition zones formed around each disc were measured and recorded according to CLSI while the average from duplicate readings was recorded [27].

Candida Susceptibility Testing

Candida species were prepared by inoculating yeast extract broth and incubating for 2 hours at 30°C to produce a slight turbidity that was compared to 0.5 McFarland standards. One hundred microlitre (100 μL) of the standardised inocula were dispensed on the surface of the dried Sabouraud dextrose agar plates and spread evenly with sterile cotton swab. The cultures were allowed to stand for 30 min. Agar wells were made with heat sterilised 6 mm cork borer and different antifungal-agents including ketoconazole (100 μg/mL), fluconazole (100 μg/mL), clotrimazole (100 μg/mL), nystatin (100 UI), griseofulvin (100 μg/mL) while commercially prepared amphotericin B (20 μg) discs were introduced to the seeded plates. The discs were gently pressed down to ensure full contacts. All the plates were labeled and incubated in an inverted position at 30°C for 24 hours. A clear inhibition zone around each of the disc was measured to the nearest millimetre using a metric ruler.

Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) by macrobroth dilution method

The MICs for the five different antibacterial agents, to which the isolates were slightly or significantly susceptible, were determined in duplicate by the macrobroth dilution method in Mueller Hinton broth according to Richard S et al., [28]. Different concentrations ranging between 0.0019 and 375 μg/mL of the antibacterial agents were prepared from stock concentrations of Tetracycline, Kanamycin, Amoxicillin, Erythromycin and Ciprofloxacin in double strength Mueller Hinton broth by serial dilution before they were inoculated with 100 μL of each of the bacterial strains adjusted to 0.5% Mcfarland standard and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. For the determination of the MICs for the antifungal agents, different concentrations ranging between 0.061 and 500 μg/mL of clotrimazole, ketoconazole and fluconazole were prepared in double strength Sabouraud dextrose agar by serial dilution before being inoculated with 100 μL of each adjusted fungal isolate and incubated at 30°C for 72 hours. Blank Mueller Hinton broth was used as negative control. The MIC was defined as the lowest dilution that showed no bacterial growth in the Mueller Hinton broth.

Determination of Minimum Bactericidal and Fungicidal Concentrations (MBC/MFC)

For the determination of the MBC and MFC according to Olajuyigbe OO and Afolayan AJ [29], the MIC tube and the next two broth cultures that showed no growth were subcultured on sterile nutrient agar and potato dextrose agar plates, while the MBC and MFC assay plates were respectively incubated for 24 hours and 72 hours, the concentration that did not produce any bacterial or fungal growth on the solid medium was regarded as MBC and MFC values for the antibiotics.

Statistical Analysis

All information collected were compiled and data were analysed using SPSS Software programme (version 18.0). Descriptive and analytical results are presented through tables and figures.

Results

The socio-demographic profiles showed ages of the 406 women in the study population were between 20-45 years (mean age 32.5 years) and 40.88% of the subjects were in 31-35 years age group. The majority of the population in the study were literates with 40% of them up to tertiary education. They included civil servants, students, business women and full time housewives who were sexually active with an average of two times sexual intercourse per week as shown in [Table/Fig-1].

Social and demographic profile of 356 study population and 50 women in control group.

Age (Years)20-25 (n=38)26-30 (n=71)31-35 (n=156)36-40 (n=51)41-45 (n=40)
Education background
(a) Primary61643174
(b) Secondary1531591314
(c) Tertiary1724542122
Marital status
(a) Single2422---
(b) Married14491565139
(c) Divorcee----1
Occupation
(a) Trading1929832118
(b) Civil servant522682522
(c) Housewife8955-
(d) Student611---
No. of children
(a) 1-3176780125
(b) 4-5-4471619
(c) 6 and above--291916
(d) No child21--4-
Sexual activity per week
(a) 1-2 times2324843425
(b) 3 and above1547721715
Demography of 50 women in the control group
Age (Years)20-25 (n=10)26-30 (n=10)31-35 (n=10)36- 40 (n=10)41-45 (n=10)
Education background
(a) Primary2234-
(b) Secondary54233
(c) Tertiary34537
Marital status
(a) Single54---
(b) Married5610109
(c) Divorcee----1
Occupation
(a) Trading12653
(b) Civil Servant34457
(c) Housewife-3---
(d) Student61---
No. of children
(a) 1-328882
(b) 4-5-2114
(c) 6 and above--114
(d) No child8----
Sexual activity per week
(a) 1-2 times23747
(b) 3 and above87363

Out of 406 women sampled, 160 (39.4%) women were combined hormonal users, 110 (27.1%) women were IUD users, 86 (21.2%) women were condom users and 50 (12.3%) women with non-specific user of methods including lactation, amenorrhoea and coitus interruptus were considered as control group. Although majority of the women in each age group used combined hormonal contraceptives and the use of contraceptives by women increased with ages ranging from 20 to 35 years and decreased from 36 to 45 years, contraceptives were more used by women in ages 31-35, followed by women in ages 26-30 years while women in other studied age ranges had varied patterns of contraceptive usages as shown in [Table/Fig-2].

Distribution of contraceptive usages among women of different age groups.

Microscopic examination of the vaginal specimens in saline and potassium hydroxide solutions showed the presence of epithelial cells ranging from 3-8 cells per High Power Field (HPF) in 88.2% of the women, pus cells ranging from 2-5 cells/HPF in 37.9% of the women, yeast cells in 25.6% of the women and trophozoite stage of Trichomonas vaginalis in 1.5% women of the sampled population. While more women in ages 31-35 had epithelial cells, pus cells and yeasts, T. vaginalis was more recorded in women in ages 21-25 years as shown in [Table/Fig-3].

Result of the microscopic examination of vaginal swab samples.

Age (Years)Epithelia cellsPus cellsYeast cellsProtozoa T. vaginalis
21-254012105
26-306236091
31-351667453-
36-40441418-
41-45441814-
Total3561541046
Control groupEpithelia cellsPus cellsYeast cellsProtozoa T. vaginalis
21-25111-
26-30221-
31-35433-
36-40222-
41-45222-
Total13109

From the bacteriological analysis of the swab samples collected, 162 pure microbial strains were identified and this gave microbial prevalence of 39.9% in the studied population. Of the 160 women using the different contraceptive methods, more strains of bacteria and fungi were isolated from women in ages 31-35 years. While more candida species were isolated from 110 women using IUDs, more bacteria strains were isolated from women using combined hormonal contraceptives. The distribution of bacterial strains isolated from the different contraceptive users (n=356) showed that 8.1% (29) women using combined hormonal contraceptives, 2.53% (9) barrier users, 1.97% (7) IUDs users and only 10% (5) of the women (n=50) in the control groups were bacteria carriers. On the contrary, while the distribution of fungal strains isolated showed that 16.01% (57) IUDs users, 5.7% (23) combined hormonal users, 5.06% (18) barrier users and 16.0% (8) of women (n=50) in the control group had fungal infection. While T. vaginalis was isolated from combined hormonal users 1.2 (5) and IUD users 0.3% (1), this organism was absent in the samples collected from other contraceptive users and non-users as shown in [Table/Fig-4]. While the bacteria isolated included Escherichia coli (11), Klebsiella oxytoca (8), Proteus mirabilis (6), Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Group B beta-haemolytic streptococci (12) and the Candida species included Candida albicans (74), Candida tropicalis (25) and Candida stellatoidea (17).

Prevalence of microbes among the contraceptive users and non users.

No of population studyNo of bacteria isolatedNo of candida species isolatedNo of T. vaginalisSubjects with no growth
Combined hormonal160 (39.4%)29 (7.1%)23 (5.7%)05 (1.2%)103 (25.4%)
20-255404
26-3008601
31-35109-
36-4042-
41-4522-
Intra uterine devices (IUD)110 (27.1%)7 (1.97%)57 (16.01%)01 (0.3%)45 (12.64%)
20-25-0601
26-30-18-
31-350520-
36-400208-
41-45-05-
Barrier (Condom)86 (21.2%)9 (2.53%)18 (5.06%)059 (16.57%)
20-2501--
26-300306
31-35-12-
36-4003--
41-4502--
Control (non users)50 (12.3%)05 (10.0%)8 (16.0%)037 (74.0%)
20-25---
26-30-02-
31-350205-
36-40-01-
41-4503--

The antibacterial assay showed that all the bacterial species were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and nitrofurantoin while they were resistant to augmentin, ampicillin and cloxacillin as shown in [Table/Fig-5].

Percentages of susceptibility of each bacterial isolate to each of the antibiotics.

ABCABCABCABCABC
Proteus mirabilisKlebsiella oxytocaEscherichia coliGroup B beta-haemolytic streptococciStaphylococcus aureus
CAZ50%-50%50%-50%-40%60%-30%70%35%20%45%
CPR99%-1%90%-10%90%-10%99%1%-100%--
OFL99%-1%90%-10%90%-20%80%10%10%96%2%2%
GEN-30%70%-23%77%85%5%10%30%30%40%60%10%30%
KAN-27%73%-10%90%65%10%30%20%30%50%60%20%20%
ERY65%5%30%50%20%3040%35%25%70%10%20%-50%50%
TET-20%80%55%10%35%30%5%65%-30%70%-45%55%
CXC--100%--100%--100%--100%--100%
AUG--100%--100%--100%--100%--100%
NIT50%30%20%95%5%-96%4%-80%15%5%94%6%-
AMP--100%--100%--100%--100%--100%
AMX-15%85%10%30%60%--100%-100%5%10%85%
KeyA=Susceptible (mm)B=Intermediate susceptible (mm)C=Resistant (mm)Key:A=Susceptible (mm)B =Intermediate susceptible (mm)C=Resistant (mm)
Ceftazidime (CAZ)≥1815-17≤14Nitrofurantoin (NIT)≥1715-16≤14
Ciprofloxacin (CPR)≥2116-20≤15Ampicillin (AMP)≥1714-16≤13
Ofloxacin (OFL)≥2116-20≤15Erythromycin (ERY)≥2314-22≤13
Gentamicin (GEN)≥1513-14≤12Tetracycline (TET)≥1915-18≤14
Augmentin (AUG)≥1513-14≤12Cloxacillin (CXC)≥1312-10≤10
Kanamycin (KAN)≥1817<16Amoxicillin (AMX)≥1714-16≤13

The antifungal assay showed that 80% of the fungal isolates were susceptible to ketoconazole with inhibition zones ranging between <20 and 28 mm, nystatin (75%) with inhibition zones ranging between 10 and ≥15 mm, clotrimazole (65%) with inhibition zones ranging between <11 and ≥20, fluconazole (60%) with zones of inhibition ranging between <14 and ≥19 mm while they were all resistant to griseofulvin [Table/Fig-6].

Susceptibility pattern of Candida species.

Antifungal agentsSusceptibleIntermediateResistant
mm
Ketoconazole(28) 80%(21-27) 15%(<20) 5%
Fluconazole(≥19) 60%(15-18) 25%(<14) 15%
Clotrimazole(≥20) 65%(12-19) 30%(<11) 5%
Nystatins(≥15) 75%(10-14) 15%(No zone) 10%
Griseofulvin--(No zone) 100%

The MIC and MBC obtained from five different antibacterial agents against the microbial isolates are as shown in [Table/Fig-7]. Interpreting the susceptibility of the bacterial isolates according to the MIC breakpoints recommended by BSAC [30] as ≤0.25 mg/L for erythromycin, ≤0.5 mg/L for ciprofloxacin, ≤1 mg/L for tetracycline, ≤4 mg/L for amoxicillin and ≤8 mg/L for kanamycin for Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus species, Enterococcus species and Gram negative aerobes [30] high percentages of the bacterial isolates were considered resistant as their MICs were mostly above the recommended MIC breakpoints. For the antifungal activities, the MICs for Candida stellatoides ranged between 0.488 and 7.81 μg/mL for clotrimazole, 0.98 and 3.90 μg/mL for ketoconazole and between 15.63 μg/mL and 62.5 μg/mL for fluconazole. Those of Candida tropicalis ranged between 0.98 μg/mL and 7.81 μg/mL for fluconazole, between 0.488 μg/mL and 3.90 μg/mL for ketoconazole and between 1.96 μg/mL and 7.81 μg/mL for fluconazole. Those of Candida albicans ranged between 0.98 μg/mL and 31.25 μg/mL for clotrimazole, between 0.488 μg/mL and 7.81 μg/mL for ketoconazole and between 0.98 μg/mL and 62.5 μg/mL for fluconazole. The minimum fungicidal concentrations were equal to the MICs or 1-2 folds greater than the MICs.

Minimum Inhibitory (MICs), bactericidal (MBCs) and fungicidal (MFCs) concentrations of the isolated microorganisms.

Susceptibility of isolates from women in the sampled population
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs)Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs)
OrganismsNo of strainsCipAmxEryTetKanCipAmxEryTetKan
μg/mLμg/mL
Staphylococcus aureus110.975-7.8120.586->3000.976-12543.75-35023.43->3751.95-7.8121.72->3001.95-25087.5-35046.87-375
Proteusmirabilis067.812-62.2537.5-> 30062.5-250350 ->35046.87->37515.625-31.2575-300125-25035093.75-375
Escherichiacoli110.22-15.625>30031.25-25043.75-35011.72-3750.44-15.625>30062.5-25021.88-35023.43-375
Klebsiellaoxytoca80.488-15.630.586-300>25087.5->35046.87->3750.976-31.254.49-300>25043.75-35093.75-375
Group B beta-haemolytic streptococci121.95-31.259.376-30031.25->25043.75->35093.74->3753.9-62.518.75->30062.5->25087.5-35093.75->375
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations (MFCs)
ClotKetFlucClotKetFluc
μg/mLμg/mL
Candidastellatoides170.488-7.810.98-3.9015.63-62.51.96-31.250.97-15.6331.25-125
Candidatropicalis250.98-7.810.488-3.901.96-7.811.96-62.50.96-15.633.96-31.25
Candidaalbicans750.98-31.250.488-7.810.98-62.51.96-62.50.97-1251.86-125
Susceptibility of isolates from women in the control group
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs)Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs)
OrganismsNo of strainsCipAmxEryTetKanCipAmxEryTetKan
μg/mLμg/mL
Proteusmirabilis115.6237.562.535093.7515.62575125350375
Klebsiellaoxytoca11.962.25>250350>3751.984.49>250> 350>375
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs)Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations (MFCs)
ClotKetFlucClotKetFluc
μg/mLμg/mL
Candidastellatoides30.98-7.810.98-3.9015.63-62.51.96-31.251.96-15.6362.5-125
Candidatropicalis21.96-3.900.488-3.901.96-7.813.90-31.250.96-7.813.96-31.25
Candidaalbicans30.98-31.250.98-7.810.98-31.251.96-31.250.97-1251.86-125

Cip: Ciprofloxacin; Amx: Amoxicillin; Ery: Erythromycin; Tet: Tetracycline; Kan: Kanamycin; Cot: Clotrimazole; Ket: Ketoconazole; Flu: Fluconazole


Discussion

The increasing level of contraceptive use among women of child bearing age is an important component of many national population and developmental programmes in sub-Sahara Africa. In this study, women in age group 31-35 years were the largest group of contraceptive users and with the highest microbial colonisation. Among the 406 women volunteers studied, 162 (39.9%) showed microbial colonisation, with different species of microorganisms. While 106 (26.1%) women had different Candida species and 50 (12.3%) women were colonised with different bacterial strains, 1.5% of the study population had Trichomonas vaginalis. The steroid based contraceptive users had higher prevalence of candida colonisation (19.7%) when compared with barrier (4.4%) and control group (2.0%). The increase in colonisation of Candida species with barrier users is in agreement with earlier reports of Enweani IB et al., and Egbe CA et al., [13,20]. The isolation of these different microbial strains could be attributed to the exposure of the vaginal to different levels of gynaecological-obstetric risks [31]. Hyperestrogenemia resulting from certain mechanisms directly mediated by estrogens resulting in increase in vaginal glycogen, reduction of vaginal pH and easier adhesion to epithelial cell [32] has also been associated with the high microbial colonisation of the vagina.

Also, when compared to other contraceptive users, the bacterial colonisation was more associated with IUD users in the age group 31-35 years. This is in agreement with Yusuf A et al., that reported bacteria flora as being more prevalent among women in age group 26-35 years [33]. However, the presence of S. aureus, E. coli, Kleb. oxytoca and P. mirabilis may be attributed to lack or insufficiency of personal hygiene and transfer of faecal organisms from the anus into the vagina during cleaning. While this may be due to the shortness and wider nature of the female urethra and its proximity to the anus, alteration in vaginal microflora [34], movement of bacteria from the rectum up the urethra [35,36] and insertion of IUDs [37] have been suggested. While the isolation of T. vaginalis was very low (1.5%), more strains were isolated among women in ages 20-25 years using combined hormonal contraception than were obtained in other age groups. This is in agreement with Daran S et al., and Gavgani ASM et al., that reported higher rate of isolation in women less than 20-year-old and higher level of sexual activity in these women may account for the high rate of infection [38,39]. This finding suggested that colonisation of the protozoa may occur when women are young but disappear with age and, possibly, increase in sexual activity.

Although there is a dearth of information on the susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from asymptomatic women using contraceptives, the antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that they were mostly resistant to antimicrobial agents used. The degree of resistance exhibited by these isolates may be attributed to the previous exposure of the women to different antibiotics at various times and the great potentials of the isolates to acquire resistance through varied mechanisms. The influence of the various contraceptives in promoting acquisition of resistance may not be underestimated. Thus, understanding the demographic and distribution of asymptomatic women using contraceptives may not be enough, detection and investigating the susceptibility profiles of microorganisms associated with them would give a better understanding of their clinical relevance. Early detection of these pathogens is important in preventing treatment failures while the knowledge of their sensitivity to antimicrobials can help to initiate empirical therapy against their potential infections [40].

Limitation(s)

The study was conducted in hospitals where treatment bills are paid by the patients. So, the study might have missed some of the women who could not attend the hospitals for same reason.

Conclusion(s)

In conclusion, this study showed that women in the age group 31-35 years were using combined hormonal contraceptives, Intra-Uterine Devices, latex condom and other contraceptive methods and are more at risk of reproductive tract infections. While the study indicated that the vaginal microbial isolates with pathogenic potentials in asymptomatic women using the different contraceptive methods, were highly resistant. The degree of these microbial resistances may be attributed to the unknown influence of the different contraceptives in promoting resistance acquisition by the microorganisms and previous exposure of the women to different antibiotics. While women desiring the use of contraceptive should be guided and fully educated on reproductive tract infections, signs and symptoms, if possible, sexual health education should also be extended to their partners in order to maintain healthy life.

References

[1]Okonofua FE, Onwudiegwu U, Odunsi OA, Illegal induced abortion: A study of 74 cases in Ile-Ife, Nigeria Trop Doct 1992 22(2):75-78.10.1177/0049475592022002091604719  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Monjok E, Smesny A, Ekabua JE, Essien EJ, Contraceptive practices in Nigeria: Literature review and recommendation for future policy decisions Open Access J Contracep 2010 1:09-22.10.2147/OAJC.S9281  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[3]Okunlola MA, Olutayo AA, Okonkwo NS, Akingbola TS, Pattern of contraceptive use among women with sickle cell disease in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria J Obstet Gynaecol 2010 30:171-74.10.3109/0144361090345279920143978  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Spencer Al, Bonnema R, McNamara MC, Helping women choose appropriate hormonal contraception: Update on risks, benefits, and indications Am J Med 2009 122:497-506.10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.01619486709  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]MacIsaac L, Intrauterine contraception: the pendulum swings back Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007 34(1):91-111.10.1016/j.ogc.2007.02.00417472867  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Amy JJ, Tripathi V, Contraception for women: an evidence-based review Brit Med J 2009 339:b289510.1136/bmj.b289519666684  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Riggs M, Klebanoff M, Nanselet T, Longitudinal association between hormonal contraceptives and bacterial vaginosis in women of reproductive age Sex Transm Dis 2007 34:954-59.10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31811ed0e418077845  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]D’Arcanques CM, Vogelsong K, Recent advances in family planning methods Arch Ibadan Med 2002 3(1):06-09.10.4314/aim.v3i1.34569  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[9]Prasad JH, Abraham S, Kurz KM, George V, Lalitha MK, John R, Reproductive tract infections among young married women in Tamil Nadu India Int Fam Plan Perspect 2005 31(2):73-82.10.1363/310730515982948  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]National Population Commission (NPC). Nigeria demographic and health survey 2009. Calverton: National Population Commission and ICF Macro; 2008  [Google Scholar]

[11]Omo-aghoja LO, Omo-aghoja VW, Aghoja CO, Okonofua FE, Aghedo O, Umueri C, Factors associated with the knowledge, practice and perceptions of contraception in rural southern Nigeria Ghana Med J 2009 43(3):115-21.10.4314/gmj.v43i3.5532620126323  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Khan I, Khan UA, A hospital based study of frequency of aerobic pathogens in vaginal infections J Rawalpindi Med Coll 2004 29(1):22-25.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Enweani IB, Gugnani HC, Okobia R, Ojo SB, Effect of contraceptive on the prevalence of vaginal colonization with Candida species in Edo State, Nigeria Rev Iberoam Micol 2001 18(4):171-73.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Baeten JM, Nyange PM, Richardson BA, Lavreys L, Chohan B, Martin HL Jr., Hormonal contraception and risk of sexually transmitted disease acquisition: results from a prospective study Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 185(2):380-85.10.1067/mob.2001.11586211518896  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Ocak S, Cetin M, Hakverdi S, Dolapcioglu K, Gungoren A, Hakverdi AU, Effects of intrauterine device and oral contraceptive on vagina flora and epithelium Saudi Med J 2007 28(5):727-31.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Tosun I, Aydin F, Kaklikkaya N, Yazici Y, Frequency of bacteria vaginosis among women attending for intrauterine device insertion at an inner-city family planning clinic Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care 2003 8(3):135-38.10.1080/ejc.8.3.135.138  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[17]Babić M, Hukić M, Candida albicans and non-albicans species as etiological agent of vaginitis in pregnant and non-pregnant women Bosnian J Basic Med Sci 2010 10(1):89-97.10.17305/bjbms.2010.274420192939  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Pal Z, Urban E, Dosa E, Pál A, Nagy E, Biofilm formation on intrauterine devices in relation to duration of use J Med Micro 2005 54:1199-203.10.1099/jmm.0.46197-016278434  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Akah PA, Nnamani CE, Nnamani PO, Prevalence and treatment outcome of vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy in a rural community in Enugu State, Nigeria J Med Med Sci 2010 1(10):447-52.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Egbe CA, Onwufor UC, Omoreigie R, Enabulele OI, Female reproductive tract infections among vaginal contraceptive users in Benin City, Nigeria Genomic Med Biomarker Health Sci 2011 3(1):49-52.10.1016/S2211-4254(11)60007-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[21]National Population Commission. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, MD: National Population Commission and ORC Marco; 2004  [Google Scholar]

[22]Odegbola O, Ogedengbe OK, The acceptance rate of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) amongst family planning clinic users in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) Nig Q J Hosp Med 2008 18(4):175-80.10.4314/nqjhm.v18i4.4502319391314  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Okunlola MA, Owonikoko KM, Roberts OA, Morhason-Bello IO, Discontinuation patterns among IUCD users at a family planning clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan J Obstet Gynaecol 2006 26(2):152-56.10.1080/0144361050044366716483976  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Falase EA, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OA, Experience with the use of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate in a Nigerian Population Afr J Med Med Sci 1988 17(4):209-13.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Omideyi AK, Akinyemi AI, Aina OI, Adeyemi AB, Fadeyibi OA, Bamiwuye SO, Akinbami CA, Anazodo A, Contraceptive practice, unwanted pregnancies and induced abortion in Southwest Nigeria Glob Public Health 2011 6(S1):S52-72.10.1080/17441692.2011.59407321722055  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Murray P, Baron E, Paflar M, Tenover F, Yolken R, Manual of Clinical Microbiology 1999 7th edUSAAmerican Society for Microbiology  [Google Scholar]

[27]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty third Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S23. Wayne, PA, USA; 2013  [Google Scholar]

[28]Richard S, Lynn SM, Avery CG, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocols 2007 New YorkCRC Press  [Google Scholar]

[29]Olajuyigbe OO, Afolayan AJ, Pharmacological assessment of the medicinal potential of Acacia mearnsii De Wild.: Antimicrobial and toxicity activities Int J Mol Sci 2012 13(4):4255-4267.10.3390/ijms1304425522605976  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]BSAC, British Society of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyDisc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing Br Soc Antimicrob Chemother 2002 2:01-46.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Wilson J, Managing recurrent bacterial vaginosis Sex Transm Infect 2004 80:8-11.10.1136/sti.2002.00273314755028  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Martin R, Soberon N, Vazquez F, Suarez JE, The vaginal microbiota: Composition, protective role, associated pathology and therapeutic perspectives Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 2008 26:160-67.10.1157/1311675318358215  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Yusuf A, Chowdhury M, Shahidul Islam KM, Eva EO, Sharif AR, Rahman K, Common microbial etiology of abnormal vaginal discharge among sexually active women in Dhaka, Bangladesh South East Asia J Publ Health 2011 1:35-39.10.3329/seajph.v1i1.13211  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[34]Hooton TM, Winter C, Tiu F, Stamm WE, Randomized comparative trial and cost analysis of 3-day antimicrobial regimens for treatment of acute cystitis in women J Am Med Assoc 1995 273:41-45.10.1001/jama.1995.03520250057034  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[35]Ebie MY, Kandakai-Olukemi YT, Ayanbadejo J, Tanyigna KB, Urinary tract infections in a Nigerian military hospital Nig J Microbiol 2001 15:31-37.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Kolawole AS, Kolawole OM, Kandaki-Olukemi YT, Babatunde SK, Durowade KA, Kolawole CF, Prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTI) among patients attending Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Int’l J Med Med Sci 2009 1:163-67.  [Google Scholar]

[37]Chandhary U, Sabharual U, Gupta K, “Group B streptococci in IUCD users” Ind J med Res 1986 84:358-60.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Sharbatdaran M, Shefaei SH, Sami H, Haji AM, Ramzanpour R, Mersadi N, Comparison of clinical presentations, wet smear, Papanicolaou smear with Dorset’s culture for diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in doubtful women to trichomoniasis Journal of Babol Univ Med Sci 2005 27:46-49.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Gavgani ASM, Namazi A, Ghazanchaei A, Alizadeh S, Sehhati F, Rostamzadeh Prevalence and risk factors of trichomoniasis among women in Tabriz Iranian J Clin Infect Dis 2008 3(2):67-71.  [Google Scholar]

[40]Sanchez MJM, Guillan MC, Fuster FC, Lopez MR, Jimenez RM, Garcia AJ, Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated from bacteriurias in Bierzo health area during 2003 Actas Urol Esp 2004 28(8):588-93.10.1016/S0210-4806(04)73139-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]