JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Surgery Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/41829.13297
Year : 2019 | Month : Nov | Volume : 13 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : PL01 - PL01

Correspondence: Persistent Mullerian Duct Syndrome with Ovarian Endometriosis

Issam Jandou1, Mehdi Graiouid2, Amine Moataz3, Dakir Mohammed4, Adil Debbagh5, Rachid Aboutaieb6

1 Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
2 Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
3 Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
4 Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morroco.
5 Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morroco.
6 Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morroco.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Issam Jandou, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
E-mail: jissam.iatros@gmail.com
Abstract

Keywords

Dear Editor,

With much interest, we have read the study of Nerune SM et al., “Persistent Mullerian Canal syndrome with ovarian endometriosis-a rare case” [1]. We appreciate the authors’ attempt to emphasise the Persistent Mullerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS) as a disorder of sexual development, but the evidence of the clinical case was in favour of ovotestis.

In the present study, the patient was 19 years old with a male phenotype and a left painful scrotum, the right testicle and external genital organs were normal. The general physical examination revealed the presence of bilateral gynecomastia. Radiological and surgical exploration was done for the pelvic solid-cystic mass. Nonetheless, the anatomo-pathological study revealed the coexistence of a testicular and ovarian tissue knowing that the patient did not benefit from a karyotype. In fact, the sum of these exams is in favour of an ovotestis and far from being a PMDS.

A Persistence of Mullerian Duct Syndrome (PMDS) is defined as an internal pseudo-hermaphroditism characterised by the presence of a uterus, fallopian tubes and the upper 1/3rd of the vagina in a normally virilized patient with karyotype 46, XY [2].

Three types of PMDS have been identified [3,4]:

Type 1 (60-70%) female type: bilateral cryptorchidism with two bilateral intra-abdominal testicles position similar to the ovaries.

Type 2 (20-30%) male type: presence of a testicle, uterus and tubes in the same hernia sac (hernia inguinal uterus).

Type 3 (10%) male type: both testicles are located in the same hernial sac with Mullerian structures (transverse testicular ectopia or cross-testicular ectopia).

The pathophysiology of PMDS is characterised by either an insufficient amount of Mullerian Inhibitory Factor (MIF) or an insensitivity of the target organ to MIF [5].

Ovotestis, which is a true hermaphroditism, is characterised by the simultaneous presence, in an individual, of testicular tissue and ovarian tissue. This type of disorder in sexual development can be classified in relation to the localisation of the gonads [6,7]:

Lateral ovotestis (20%) is characterised by the presence of a testicle on one side and the ovary on the other side.

Bilateral ovotestis (3%) with a mixed gonad on both sides.

Unilateral ovotestis (50%) with a mixed gonad on one side and a normal one on the other side (ovary or testicle).

The discussed clinical case is characteristic of an ovotestis, of the type “lateral ovotestis”

In conclusion, this case report has been deprived of scientific value due to its false definition of the development disorder which must be considered as an ovotestis and not a persistent of Mullerian duct syndrome.

References

[1]Nerune SM, Hippargi SB, Mestri NB, Mehrotra NM, Persistent Mullerian Duct Syndrome with Ovarian Endometriosis-A Rare Case Report J Clin Diagn Res 2016 10(2):ED14-ED15.10.7860/JCDR/2016/16691.726627042476  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Barki A, Khalil F, Tahri R, Amrani M, Faik M, El Otmany A, Syndrome de la persistance des canaux de Muller Progrés Urol 2010 20(13):1227-1229.10.1016/j.purol.2010.01.00621130405  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Agrawal AS, Kataria R, Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome (PMDS): a rare anomaly the general surgeon must now about Indian J Surg 2015 77:217-221.10.1007/s12262-013-1029-726246705  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Berkmen F, Persistent Mullerian duct syndrome with or without transverse testicular ectopia and testis tumours Br J Urol 1997 79:122-26.10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.27226.x9043511  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Josso N, Development and descent of the fetal testis. In: Bierich JL, Rager K, Ranke, editors Maldescensus testis 1977 MunichUrban and Schwarzenberg:03-11.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Auchus RJ, Chang AY, 46, XX DSD: the masculinised female Best Pract Res ClinEndocrinol Met 2010 24(2):219-42.10.1016/j.beem.2009.11.00120541149  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Krob G, Braun A, Kuhnle U, True hermaphroditism: geographical distribution, clinical findings, chromosomes and gonadal histology European Journal of Paediatrics 1994 153:2e1010.1007/s0043100500778313919  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]