JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/40860.13132
Year : 2019 | Month : Sep | Volume : 13 | Issue : 09 Full Version Page : ZC09 - ZC13

Oral Health of Babies and Mothers during the Breastfeeding Period

Luciana Pereira Da Silva1, Valéria De Abreu Da Silva Bastos2, Tatiana Kelly Da Silva Fidalgo3, Carla martins De Oliveira4, Luciana Pomarico5, Ana Paula Valente6, Liana Bastos Freitas-Fernandes7, Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro De Souza8

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
2 Adjunct Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Fluminense Federal University, RJ, Brazil.
3 Adjunct Professor, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
4 Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
5 Adjunct Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
6 Full Professor, Department of Medical Biochemistry, National Center for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
7 Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
8 Full Professor, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Ivete Pomarico Ribeiro de Souza, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325, Ilha do Fundão, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/RJ, CEP: 21941-913- Brazil.
E-mail: pomarico@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Puerperal woman and new-born children are vulnerable and frequently have neglected health conditions.

Aim

The objective is to describe the oral health and saliva profiles of women and their babies during the breastfeeding period, including breast milk.

Materials and Methods

Forty-seven mothers were interviewed and demographic data were recorded. The mother-baby pairs underwent intraoral examination. The mothers were submitted to examination of oral mucosa, oral hygiene status by O’Leary, periodontal condition and caries (DMF-T: decayed, missing and filled teeth) in order to establish buccal conditions. The babies had their oral mucosa and teeth examined. Salivary samples of babies and mothers as well the breastmilk of mothers were collected and analysed by 1H-NMR through a 600 MHz spectrometer. The data were analysed in a statistical program SPSS.21 (IBM Statistics).

Results

The mothers’ mean age was 27-years-old and 53.9% of mothers were overweight. The oral condition revealed poor oral health: DMF-T=8.20, 72.4% had gingivitis and 62% had dental plaque. The babies presented 4.18% cases of oral candidiasis and 2.08% cases of Bohn nodules, with no caries. The salivary 1H-NMR spectra from babies with more than six months of age showed increased levels of lactate, ethanol, acetate, propionate, N-butyrate and N-acetyl sugars and reduced levels of other sugars. The 1H-NMR analysis of salivary samples from the mothers showed metabolites such as propionate, ethanol, lactate, acetate, butyrate and N-acetyl and sugar region. The 1H-NMR breast milk demonstrated high quantity of lactose in a region of spectra characteristic from sugars. It was concluded that the mothers had low levels caries activity; however, though they had past dental caries history. This may have an impact on the oral health of their children.

Conclusion

Our study focused on the oral health and saliva profiles of women and their babies during breastfeeding period. This data could design a preventive programme that would improve the oral health and quality of life.

Keywords

Introduction

Previous systematic reviews highlight the need to improve the oral health of caregivers and mothers to impact in their babies [1-3]. Preventive measures should be taught to the whole family to improve oral hygiene habits, based on instructions for oral health promotion [4-6]. Gingivitis is one of the most common clinical periodontal conditions among women during pregnancy and breastfeeding period [7-9]. It is well known that oral hygiene is related to gingival health [9], and the frequency of preventive measures during pregnancy as well as after the postpartum period, most of the time are neglected by women [7].

The aim of this study is to describe the oral health conditions and saliva profiles of mothers and their respective babies in the breastfeeding period, including the breast milk.

Materials and Methods

Sample Subjects

After approval of the Local Ethical Committee (CAAE: 0197.0.314.000-09), 47 pairs of mothers and babies were selected from two maternity hospitals and a outpatient public clinic ((Fernando Magalhães Hospital, Federal Hospital of Bonsucesso and the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro). The sample was a convenience sample that was obtained during 19 months.

The inclusion criteria were: mothers breast-feeding with clinically healthy babies that were attending hospital for follow-up.

Exclusion criteria: smoking and/or the presence of systemic disease. Each woman signed a written consent authorising her own participation and also her babies participation-as legal guardians.

Data Collection

The study was cross-sectional, which analysed oral health status and profile of salivary metabolites of 47 women and their babies (0-28-months-old). The anamnesis of mothers and babies were performed in order to obtain information about age and socioeconomic conditions [7], as well as general health, delivery type, Body Mass Index (BMI) and breastfeeding. All participants provided 2 mL of unstimulated saliva by spitting into a sterilise plastic tube on ice. Mothers were required to refrain from eating and drinking for 2 hours and babies for 1 hour before saliva collection. For saliva collection of babies, a pipette was positioned at the floor of the mouth to collect 0.5 mL of unstimulated whole saliva. Thereafter, the breast milk was collected. We used the same methodology in the study as described by Fidalgo TK et al., [10]. During the collection period, the individuals were comfortably seated in a ventilated and lighted room. All salivary samples were centrifuged at 4°C and 10,000 g for 60 minutes (Cientec, CT-15000R, Brazil), and the supernatants were stored at −80°C until NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) analysis as recommended by Silwood [11].

The intraoral examination was performed by a calibrated examiner, and periodontal exam was performed (Kappa=0.83), DMF-T suggested by the World Health Organisation [10] (Kappa=0.84). The mothers examination started with mucosa examination, followed by periodontal examination, which included the presence of plaque, gingival, calculus and suppuration for four surfaces and calculated percentages; Bleeding on Probing (BOP); Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL) recorded at six sites per teeth in all teeth (except at the third molars). Thereafter, data for DMF-T were collected [12,13]. It was considered with dental plaque subject with 25% of the surfaces with plaque, as suggested by the O’Leary index [14]. O’Leary index assess the oral hygiene status since it provide the percentages of biofilm. The sensitivity of this index is the oral hygiene level of each individual (above 25% the patient have a poor oral hygiene). Specificity of the index indicated by the amount of biofilm for each surface calculated according to the amount of teeth present in individual mouth [14]. Clinical diagnosis of periodontal status was established for all subjects based on the following criteria: periodontally healthy <10% of sites with BOP and no PPD or CAL >3 mm, although PPD or CAL=4 mm in up to 5% of the sites without BOP was allowed; gingivitis >10% of sites with BOP and no PPD or CAL >3 mm, although PPD or CAL=4 mm in up to 5% of the sites without BOP was allowed; chronic periodontitis >10% of teeth with PPD and/or CAL >5 mm and BOP. Generalised aggressive periodontitis was characterised by involvement of 30% of teeth with PPD and/or CAL >5 mm with BOP concurrently and including at least one incisor and first molar [15].

Regarding the babies, the oral examination consisted of bucal mucosa analyses to identify any mucosa changes, and, thereafter, the number of teeth and caries index were registered.

NMR Measurements

The salivary samples of mothers were prepared by mixing 0.450 mL of salivary supernatant, 0.050 mL of deuterium oxide (99.8% D2O, which provided a field-frequency lock) and 0.010 mL of sodium dodecyl sulphate 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid (DSS) 20 mM for chemical shift reference of 1H spectra, δ=0.00 parts per million (ppm). On the other hand, the salivary samples of infants were prepared by mixing 0.170 mL of salivary supernatant, 0.0189 mL of D2O and 0.0038 mL of DSS 20 mM (maintaining the same proportion as the salivary samples of mothers for D2O and DSS preparation). The human milk samples were prepared by mixing 0.400 mL of salivary supernatant, 0.20 mL of D2O and 0.010 mL of DSS 10 mM for chemical shift reference of 1H spectra, δ=0.00 ppm. The field-frequency was set by detecting the D2O signal. For the NMR spectra acquisition, a Bruker 600 MHz Advance spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a 5 mm high-resolution probe and operating at a frequency of 600 (1H) MHz was used [16]. All spectra were obtained at 25°C with water suppression by presaturation [16,17].

The Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) pulse sequence was used to suppress signals from proteins and other macromolecules through a T2 filter, (1024 scans for the salivary samples of mothers and 2048 scans for the salivary samples of infants). 1H-1H Total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) experiments were performed with acquisition parameters of 256 T1 increments, a spectral width of 12,019 Hz in each dimension and a mixing time of 70 ms. The major signals identify unambiguously assigned based on TOCSY, Silwood CJ et al., [11] and the Human Metabolome Database (http://www.hmdb.ca) [11,18].

Statistical Analysis

The data of mothers and babies, such as age, DMF-T index and the results from periodontal exams, were computed on SPSS software 16.0 (SPSS Inc., MN, USA). The frequencies, besides mean and Standard Deviation (SD), were described, and the Chi-square test was used for statistical analyses with a 5% significance level (p≤0.05). The chi-square test was done for the analyses of dental plaque against frequency of brushing/dental plaque against gingivitis. For analysis of the NMR data, each spectra was submitted to baseline adjustment by Topspin® software (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany), and the metabolite data were descriptively analysed.

Results

The mean±SD age of the mothers (n=47) and babies (n=48) was 27.6±6.34-years and 132.8±165.7-days, respectively. One mother had twins. Among the babies, 56% were male and 44% female. Thirty-nine (81.25%) babies were edentulous, while nine (18.75%) babies presented a total of 74 teeth, varying from 2 to 16 teeth each. None of them had dental caries. Three babies presented oral alterations, such as candidiasis (n=2) and Bohn nodules (n=1). More information such as weight, BMI of mothers, economic classification, parturition and breastfeeding are shown in [Table/Fig-1].

Demographic data which characterise the mother and babies and oral health condition.

VariablesMothers (n=47)Babies (n=48)
Age (±SD)*
Mothers in years27.6 (±6.3)132.8 (±165.7)
Infants in days
Gender (%)
Male---27(56.2%)
Female21 (43.8%)
Income
<5 salaries46 (97.8%)---
5-10 salaries0.0%
10-15 salaries0.0%
>15 salaries1 (2.2%)
Economic classification 21
B2 (score 23-28)1 (2.2%)---
C1 (score 18-22)20 (42.2%)
C2 (score 14-17)23 (48.9%)
D (score <14)3 (6.7%)
Weight-Kg (±SD)*66.6 (±18.2)3.3 (±6.2)
BMI (±SD)*26.1 (±5.8)---
Classification of BMI
Under weight3(5.10%)---
Normal weight19 (41.0%)
Overweight15 (33.4%)
Class I obesity6 (12.8%)
Class II obesity3 (5.1%)
Class III obesity1 (2.6%)
Breastfeeding (exclusive)30 (64.6%)
Parturition
Vaginal birth14 (29.2%)---
Cesarean section33 (70.8%)

*Standard deviation; BMI: Body mass index


Considering the oral condition, the presence of dental plaque was observed in 62% of mothers and 72.4% presented with gingivitis [Table/Fig-2]. No difference was found between the correlation of dental plaque and frequency of dental brushing as well as the gingivitis. The DMF-T index was 8.20 (±6.39) and the decayed component was 1.71 (±1.94), indicating low levels of actual caries activity with a significant caries history.

Oral findings of mothers and their babies.

VariablesMothers group (n=47)
Frequency of tooth brushing (times a day)2.7±0.8
Plaque presence*29 (62.0%)
Presence of calculus3 (6.1%)
Pocket depth (mm)2.0
Bleeding on probing (% sites)22
Attachment level (mm)2.1
Suppuration (% sites)0.0
Gingivitis (% women)**34 (72.4%)
Periodontitis (% women)***0%
DMFT (±SD)****8.2 (±6.39)
Decayed teeth1.71
Missing teeth16.4
Filled teeth9.9
VariablesBabies group (n=48)
Number of teeth (±SD)****3.2±6.3
Babies without teeth39 (81.2%)
Babies with teeth9 (18.7%)
Dmft0.0
Oral healthy (%)45 (93.8%)
Alterations
Candidiasis (%)2 (4.2%)
Bohn nodule (%)1 (2.1%)

*62.0% of the mothers had over 25% plaque presence (O’Leary et al., 1972); **72.4% of the mothers had gingivitis (da Silva-Boghossian et al., 2011); ***(da Silva-Boghossian et al., 2011); ****Standard deviation


The [Table/Fig-3] shows that babies with more than six months of age, with teeth, had increasing levels of lactate, ethanol, acetate, propionate, N-butyrate and N-acetyl sugars and reduced levels of sugar. The [Table/Fig-4] demonstrates the spectra of children without teeth with exclusive and mixed breast milk, showing the presence of milk in saliva. The [Table/Fig-5] shows 1H-NMR analysis of salivary samples from orally healthy and unhealthy mothers (caries or periodontal disease), showing alterations in metabolites, such as propionate, ethanol, lactate, acetate, butyrate and N-acetyl sugar, and the sugar region. Finally, the [Table/Fig-6] illustrates the 1H-NMR breastfeeding milk from three mothers, demonstrating the high intensity of lactose in the sugar region.

1H NMR saliva spectra differences among children with (A and B) and without teeth.

1H-NMR saliva spectra of children without teeth with exclusive (A and B) and mixed (C and D) breast milk.

1H NMR saliva spectra of mothers with (A and B) and without (C and D) oral disease.

Illustrates the 1H-NMR breastfeeding milk from three mothers, demonstrating the high intensity of lactose in the sugar region.

Discussion

Oral hygiene is an important step in the maintenance of oral health, especially during the pregnancy and breastfeeding period [19,20]. Mothers of young children are supposed to understand that their oral health influence the health of their babies [19,21]. In our study, the mothers had high amounts of dental plaque and gingivitis, which was not consistent with the frequency of oral hygiene habits mentioned by them. The level of gingivitis in this group is in line with previous investigations and correlates with the amount of dental plaque [22]. Gingivitis is most frequent periodontal disease observed among women during the breastfeeding period [23-25], this can be related to the hormonal changes that occur during gestational as well as puerperal period [24,26]. According to the applied criteria in this study [7], we could not classify any patient with periodontitis.

The present study evaluated the mother’s oral condition by dental caries score and oral health related to their children’s oral status. Although the subjects were young, the missing teeth component was high, indicating a decayed oral history. It was also correlated with previously study that indicated the number of missing teeth in the mothers reflected the number of decayed teeth of their children [26]. One of the limitations of our study is the small sample size but despite of that we found similar results in other study done with larger population [27]. Dental care should start during the early childhood and the mothers are key participants in the process, while the school and community could give important support [28]. The main finding of the present study is that mother’s oral health is not reflected in the children’s oral health due to the young age, IgA from the milk among other factors, although they claim lack of daily oral hygiene [20,29].

The oral conditions of the babies were mostly healthy; one child presented Bohn nodules, and two children presented candidiasis, a well-documented condition in children [30]. It is important to note that both children with candidiasis are twins and the mother was not aware of the necessity of cleaning breast and mouth after feeding each baby or even if this condition needed treatment. The baby twins were treated and recovered oral health. This fact motivates the mother to understand the impact of baby mouth cleaning particularly during and after the breastfeeding period. The best way to clean the babies’ mouth is still under debate, despite the importance of preventing even opportunistic flora. Sales AB et al., compared cleaning with gaze and hydrogen peroxide (0.75%) or distilled water and observed no difference in the reduction of the number of Streptococcus spp and Candida [31].

Our study showed similarities among mother/babies saliva by NMR analysis. However, it seems that baby saliva has higher amount of sugar, such as lactose because of breast milk. It was also found that a modification of saliva profile occurred in 1 month and 6 months old babies, which revealed changes in the levels of lactate, ethanol, acetate, propionate, N-butyrate and N-acetyl sugars and reduced levels of sugar. It is known that the saliva flow rate of young children is 18 times lower than older children or adults [32]. The saliva of the younger babies, exclusively breastfeeding, presented increased levels of lactose, and low levels of acid production and older babies saliva, non-exclusively breastfeeding, we observed a decrease in sugar content.

The reduced saliva flow rate in babies is a factor for bacteria retention on different oral surfaces, which favors growth of bacteria. It is understood that baby saliva could play a role in the colonisation of bacteria in the mouths of young children. Further investigation should be done to clarify the composition of baby saliva. The children with primary dentition presented with a higher concentration of organic acids from the metabolism of microorganisms. These children presented erupted teeth and higher areas of enamel for microorganism colonisation, increasing the acid production [10].

In addition, a preventive programme that would improve the oral health and quality of life should include an educational program involving the family, community and health personnel. There is an impact of maternal self-efficacy and oral health beliefs on early childhood caries and other factor as for example cultural background may influence this aspect, as was pointed out observed by Wilson AR el al., 2017 [20]. Consequently, the programme should incorporate caregiver’s social determinants including knowledge, health beliefs and attitudes, stress, self-efficacy, social network strength, and acculturation status [29]. Since, higher sugar consumption is well correlated with higher caries risk, as was indicated in the recommendation for oral health in infancy (AAPD 2014), the role of the family should be the change in lifestyle and exchange the high sugar level diet to healthier one, and therefore, to promote adequate child development (WHO 2017) [30,33].

Limitation

Small sample size and similar socio-economic status that may have affected the results.

Conclusion

The mothers that participated in this study had poor oral health, which didn’t had an impact on the oral health of their babies. NMR analyses of saliva samples showed differences between mothers and babies, and the intensity of metabolites, showed that lactose is dominant in the saliva of younger babies when compared to mothers and older babies. Non-exclusive breastfeeding babies’ saliva had less sugar content. It seems that babies saliva composition is related to the diet.

Future Recommendation

The mother should be aware of the impact of baby mouth cleaning particularly within and after the breastfeeding. The best way to clean the babies’ mouth is still under debate. It is necessary to design a preventive approach for mother/babies during breastfeeding period to improve early childhood quality of life.

*Standard deviation; BMI: Body mass index*62.0% of the mothers had over 25% plaque presence (O’Leary et al., 1972); **72.4% of the mothers had gingivitis (da Silva-Boghossian et al., 2011); ***(da Silva-Boghossian et al., 2011); ****Standard deviation

References

[1]Dieterich CM, Felice JP, O’Sullivan E, Rasmussen KM, Breastfeeding and health outcomes for the mother-infant dyad Pediatr Clin North Am 2013 60(1):31-48.10.1016/j.pcl.2012.09.01023178059  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Salone LR, Vann WF Jr, Dee DL, Breastfeeding: An overview of oral and general health benefits J Am Dent Assoc 2013 144(2):143-51.10.14219/jada.archive.2013.009323372130  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Bigman G, Wilkinson AV, Perez A, Homedes N, Acculturation and breastfeeding among hispanic american women: A systematic review Matern Child Health J 2018 22(9):1260-77.10.1007/s10995-018-2584-030003522  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Hames-Kocabas EE, Ucar F, Kocatas Ersin N, Uzel A, Alpoz AR, Colonization and vertical transmission of Streptococcus mutans in Turkish children Microbiol Res 2008 163(2):168-72.10.1016/j.micres.2006.03.01616735109  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]van Loveren C, Buijs JF, ten Cate JM, Similarity of bacteriocin activity profiles of mutans streptococci within the family when the children acquire the strains after the age of 5 Caries Res 2000 34(6):481-85.10.1159/00001662711093022  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Davey AL, Rogers AH, Multiple types of the bacterium Streptococcus mutans in the human mouth and their intra-family transmission Arch Oral Biol 1984 29(6):453-60.10.1016/0003-9969(84)90026-8  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[7]Penova-Veselinovic B, Keelan JA, Wang CA, Newnham JP, Pennell CE, Changes in inflammatory mediators in gingival crevicular fluid following periodontal disease treatment in pregnancy: Relationship to adverse pregnancy outcome J Reprod Immunol 2015 112:01-10.10.1016/j.jri.2015.05.00226093363  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Carrillo-de-Albornoz A, Figuero E, Herrera D, Cuesta P, Bascones-Martinez A, Gingival changes during pregnancy: III. Impact of clinical, microbiological, immunological and socio-demographic factors on gingival inflammation J Clin Periodontol 2012 39(3):272-83.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01800.x22092526  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Rudiger SG, Carlen A, Meurman JH, Kari K, Olsson J, Dental biofilms at healthy and inflamed gingival margins J Clin Periodontol 2002 29(6):524-30.10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290609.x12296780  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Fidalgo TKS, Freitas-Fernandes LB, Angeli R, Muniz M, Gonsalves E, Santos R, FLBF-FRAAMSMEGRSJNFCL, Salivary metabolite signatures of children with and without dental caries lesions Metabolomics 2013 9(3):657-66.10.1007/s11306-012-0484-7  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Silwood CJ, Lynch E, Claxson AW, Grootveld MC, 1H and (13)C NMR spectroscopic analysis of human saliva J Dent Res 2002 81(6):422-27.10.1177/15440591020810061312097436  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Dieudonne B, WHO epidemiological surveys on oral health Int Dent J 1990 40(6):377-78.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Duran D, Monsalves MJ, Aubert J, Zarate V, Espinoza I, Systematic review of Latin American national oral health surveys in adults Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2018 46(4):328-35.10.1111/cdoe.1237929700842  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE, The plaque control record J Periodontol 1972 43(1):3810.1902/jop.1972.43.1.384500182  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]da Silva-Boghossian CM, do Souto RM, Luiz RR, Colombo AP, Association of red complex, A. actinomycetemcomitans and non-oral bacteria with periodontal diseases Arch Oral Biol 2011 56(9):899-906.10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.02.00921397893  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Bertram HC, Eggers N, Eller N, Potential of human saliva for nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics and for health-related biomarker identification Anal Chem 2009 81(21):9188-93.10.1021/ac902059819780580  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Liepinsh E, Otting G, Wuthrich K, NMR spectroscopy of hydroxyl protons in aqueous solutions of peptides and proteins J Biomol NMR 1992 2(5):447-65.10.1007/BF021928081384851  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Piotto M, Saudek V, Sklenar V, Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions J Biomol NMR 1992 2(6):661-65.10.1007/BF021928551490109  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Manchanda K, Sampath N, Sarkar AD, Evaluating the effectiveness of oral health education program among mothers with 6-18 months children in prevention of early childhood caries Contemp Clin Dent 2014 5(4):478-83.10.4103/0976-237X.14281525395763  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Wilson AR, Mulvahill MJ, Tiwari T, The Impact of Maternal Self-Efficacy and Oral Health Beliefs on Early Childhood Caries in Latino Children Front Public Health 2017 5:22810.3389/fpubh.2017.0022828894733  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Medeiros PB, Otero SA, Frencken JE, Bronkhorst EM, Leal SC, Effectiveness of an oral health program for mothers and their infants Int J Paediatr Dent 2015 25(1):29-34.10.1111/ipd.1209424393627  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Catala-Lopez F, Genova-Maleras R, [Prevention and control of chronic non-communicable diseases in Spain: A call to action] Med Clin (Barc) 2013 140(11):502-03.10.1016/j.medcli.2012.11.00623294629  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Merchant AT, Sutherland MW, Liu J, Pitiphat W, Dasanayake A, Periodontal treatment among mothers with mild to moderate periodontal disease and preterm birth: reanalysis of OPT trial data accounting for selective survival Int J Epidemiol 2018 47(5):1670-78.10.1093/ije/dyy08929868830  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Govindasamy R, Dhanasekaran M, Varghese SS, Balaji VR, Karthikeyan B, Christopher A, Maternal Risk Factors and Periodontal Disease: A Cross-sectional Study among Postpartum Mothers in Tamil Nadu J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2017 9(Suppl 1):S50-S54.10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_88_1729284936  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Pahkla ER, Jogi E, Nurk A, Pisarev H, Koppel T, Naaber P, Saag M, Loivukene K, Periodontal disease in mothers indicates risk in their children Int J Paediatr Dent 2010 20(1):24-30.10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01027.x20059590  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Kim YN SY, Kim YS, Effects of mother’s oral health care behaviors on dental caries in primary school children J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2012 12:145-56.10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.1.145  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[27]Sun-Mi Lee, Han-Na K, Jung-Ha Lee, Jin-Bom Kim, Association between maternal and child oral health and dental caries in Korea Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice 2019 27:219-27.10.1007/s10389-018-0936-2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[28]Tinanoff N, Baez RJ, Diaz Guillory C, Donly KJ, Feldens CA, McGrath C, Phantumvanit P, Pitts NB, Seow WK, Sharkov N, Songpaisan Y, Twetman S, Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective Int J Paediatr Dent 2019 29(3):238-48.10.1111/ipd.1248431099128  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]da Fonseca MA, Avenetti D, Social Determinants of Pediatric Oral Health Dent Clin North Am 2017 61(3):519-32.10.1016/j.cden.2017.02.00228577634  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Phantumvanit P, Makino Y, Ogawa H, Rugg-Gunn A, Moynihan P, Petersen PE, Evans W, Feldens CA, Lo E, Khoshnevisan MH, Baez R, Varenne B, Vichayanrat T, Songpaisan Y, Woodward M, Nakornchai S, Ungchusak C, WHO Global Consultation on Public Health Intervention against Early Childhood Caries Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2018 46(3):280-87.10.1111/cdoe.1236229380407  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Sales AB, Palud , Arruda F, Schwartz JP, Pinto MHB, Santos EB, Comparação entre dois métodos de higiene bucal em bebês no controle de streptococcus spp e candida Revista Gestão & Saúde 2014 11:18-21.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Dezan CC, Nicolau J, Souza DN, Walter LR, Flow rate, amylase activity, and protein and sialic acid concentrations of saliva from children aged 18, 30 and 42 months attending a baby clinic Arch Oral Biol 2002 47(6):423-27.10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00032-8  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[33]Kharbanda OP, Moynihan P, Priya H, Ivaturi A, Gupta A, Haldane D, Report from a symposium on accelerating policy-driven action against excessive sugar consumption for the prevention of early childhood caries and noncommunicable diseases Indian J Public Health 2018 62(4):305-07.10.4103/ijph.IJPH_314_1730539895  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]