JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Public Health Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/40661.13030
Year : 2019 | Month : Jul | Volume : 13 | Issue : 07 Full Version Page : LM01 - LM03

Body Weight and Its Relationship with Muscle Strength among Adolescents in Malaysia

Hazreen Abdul Majid1, Noran Naqiah Hairi2, Tin Tin Su3, Muhammad Yazid Jalaludin4, Maznah Dahlui5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5 Associate Professor, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Hazreen Abdul Majid, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur-50603, Malaysia.
E-mail: hazreen@ummc.edu.my
Abstract

Introduction

Few studies have investigated the relationship of handgrip strength as an index of nutritional status to morbidity and mortality in adults and elderly. However, it is not clear if differences exist in handgrip strength, begins at adolescent age and what are their determinants.

Aim

To describe the muscle strength of the Malaysian adolescents and to determine the predictors of handgrip strength.

Materials and Methods

The study followed a stratified sampling design. This study examined data of 933 students comprising of multi ethnic adolescents, aged 13 years, from March to May 2012. Muscle strength was measured using calibrated hand dynamometer. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression.

Results

Male adolescents had greater muscle strength compared to female adolescents (17.8 vs. 14.7 kg). The strength of the right handgrip was greater in both males and females compared to the left handgrip with a difference of 1.39 kg in male and 0.9 kg in female adolescents. Weight and Waist circumference (WC) were significant predictors for handgrip strength for both males and females.

Conclusion

This study indicates that weight and WC are among of the determinants of muscle strength for the multi-ethnic Malaysian adolescents. Future study should focus on exploring causes of the muscle strength and lifestyle.

Keywords

Introduction

Muscle strength was found to be a predictor of quality of life, functional disability, physical frailty and mortality in the adult and elderly population [1,2]. Therefore, screening for loss of skeletal muscle mass using the handgrip strength test can be an effective tool for geriatric care in enhancing physical function [1]. It has also been shown that long-term obesity is associated with poor muscle strength later in life [3]. As muscle strength changes with age, baseline measurement from healthy adolescents is crucial to provide future study reference.

Muscle strength was also shown to be associated with the risk factors of cardiovascular health in adolescents [4]. Although a strong correlation between handgrip strength and total muscle strength were found among adolescents [5], further studies are required to investigate the association between muscle strength and body composition among adolescents. Hence, this study was designed to describe muscle strength of Malaysian adolescents and to determine the predictors of handgrip strength. This study is important as there is scarce available large data from the middle income developing country.

Materials and Methods

Research Design and Sampling

The study used the stratified sampling where the following formula was applied for sample size calculation; n=(z2×p×q/r×e2)×design effect (z=the standard normal deviate set at 1.96 at 5% level for two-tailed test, p=estimated prevalence, q=1-p, r=response rate and e=precision level). The sample size was calculated using the estimated prevalence of adolescent students aged 13-15 who smoked in school. For the handgrip study, the baseline data of a cohort study was used, reported previously [6]. This study recruited 933 public secondary school students from three states in Malaysia which is Perak, Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan. Data were collected between March and May 2012. Ethical approval of study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee, University of Malaya (MEC Ref. No. 896.34). Participation in the study was voluntary and written informed consent and ascent for participation in the study was obtained from the parents or guardian as well as the participants.

Anthropometry and Physical Assessment

A calibrated vertical steadiometer (Seca Portable 217, Seca, UK) was used to measure height and the reading was recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. A digital electronic weighing scale (Seca 813, Seca, UK) was used to measure weight and the reading was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg. Prior to the weight and height measurement, participants were asked to remove shoes and socks and wear light indoor clothes. Hip Circumference (HC) and Waist Circumference (WC) were measured with a non-elastic Seca measuring tape (Seca 201, Seca, UK), to the nearest millimetre. Systolic (SBP) and Diastolic arterial blood pressure (DBP) were obtained using a stethoscope and a mercury sphygmomanometer (CK-101 C, Spirit Medical Co, Taiwan).

A calibrated hand dynamometer (Jamar, Sammons Preston Rolyan, Illinois, US) was used to perform the hand grip strength test. The technique was adopted from a published literature [7]. Participants were asked to show their dominant hand. The first test was performed with dominant hand and then, with the non-dominant hand. Three sets of test were repeated alternately for both hands. A non-elastic Seca measuring tape (Seca 201, Seca, UK) was used to measure the length of hand span. Participants were asked to open their hand as wide as possible in order for researcher to measure from the tip of the thumb to the tip of the little finger.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS software for Windows (Version 21.0, Chicago, IL, US). Complex samples general linear model analysis was used. The final models were developed independently between sex.

Results

The overall mean handgrip strength of Malaysian adolescents was 15.8 (95% CI: 15.4, 16.2) kg [Table/Fig-1]. The highest handgrip strength of male (n=378) and female (n=555) adolescents were 17.8 (95% CI: 17.0, 18.6) kg and 14.7 (95% CI: 14.3, 15.2) kg, respectively. The strength of the right handgrip was higher in both males and females compared to the left handgrip with a difference of 1.39 kg in male and 0.9 kg in female adolescents. Resting pulse rate was significantly higher in female adolescents compared to male adolescents by 4.3%. Furthermore, the HC was significantly higher in female compared to male adolescents by 4% but WC was significantly greater in male compared to female adolescents by 3.7% [Table/Fig-1].

Characteristics of the study participants.

Male (n= 378)%Female (n= 555)%All (n= 933)%
Ethnicity
  Malay79.183.582.0
  Chinese8.97.37.9
  Indian8.76.67.3
  Others3.32.62.8
Male (n=378) Mean (95% CI)Female (n=555) Mean (95% CI)All (n=933) Mean (95% CI)
Weight (kg)46.04 (44.46, 46.62)45.99 (44.91, 47.08)46.01 (45.12, 46.90)
Height (cm)1.51 (1.50, 1.52)1.52 (1.51, 1.52)1.51 (1.51, 1.52)
BMI (kg/m2)19.92 (19.35, 20.49)19.90 (19.49, 20.32)19.91 (19.57, 20.25)
Length of right hand from little finger to thumb18.82 (18.61, 19.04)18.18 (18.04, 18.32)18.40 (18.28, 18.52)
Length of left hand from little finger to thumb19.00 (18.78, 19.21)18.27 (18.12, 18.41)18.51 (18.39, 18.63)
On average, strength of hand grip of right hand (kg)18.47 (17.63, 19.31)15.19 (14.72, 15.67)16.33 (15.88, 16.77)
On average, strength of hand grip of left hand (kg)17.08 (16.29, 17.86)14.27 (13.81, 14.74)15.24 (14.82, 15.66)
Hand grip highest average (kg)17.79 (16.99, 18.58)14.74 (14.29, 15.18)15.79 (15.37, 16.21)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)109.33 (107.91, 110.75)109.96 (108.85, 111.08)109.75 (108.87, 110.64)
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)67.67 (66.51, 68.83)67.46 (66.51, 68.41)67.53 (66.79, 68.27)
Resting pulse rate (bpm)85.48 (83.88, 87.09)89.13 (88.00, 90.26)87.91 (86.98, 88.84)
Resting SpO2 (5)98.48 (98.36, 98.60)98.35 (98.26, 98.44)98.39 (98.32, 98.46)
Measurement of hip (cm)83.90 (82.70, 85.11)87.28 (86.40, 88.16)86.14 (85.43, 86.86)
Measurement of waist (cm)70.30 (68.91, 71.68)67.77 (66.81, 68.72)68.62 (67.83, 69.41)

The regression coefficients for male and female adolescents were adjusted for weight, height, ethnicity, right hand span, left hand span, SBP, DBP, resting pulse, HC, Tanner staging and abdominal obesity [Table/Fig-2]. In addition, left hand span and HC significantly predicted handgrip strength for male adolescents whereas height predicted handgrip strength for female adolescents [Table/Fig-2]. In this multivariate model, it appears that the model of handgrip strength among male adolescents fitted better than the females.

Gender specific Multiple Linear Regression Models with Complex Sample General Linear Model.

Model 1 (unadjusted)Model 2 (adjusted)
β (95% CI)p-valueβ (95% CI)p-value
Males
Weight (kg)0.566 (0.122, 0.329)<0.001*0.432 (0.240, 0.625)<0.001*
Height (cm)0.104 (0.001, 0.133)0.046*0.061 (-0.091, 0.214)0.429
Ethnicity-0.004 (-0.838, 0.754)0.917-0.193 (-0.980, 0.594)0.630
Right hand span-0.057 (-0.897, 0.478)0.549-0.246 (-1.153, 0.661)0.594
Left hand span0.294 (0.389, 1.755)0.002*1.111 (0.134, 2.088)0.026*
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)0.153 (0.028, 0.139)0.003*0.036 (-0.030, 0.102)0.281
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)-0.059 (-0.086, 0.022)0.246-0.032 (-0.110, 0.046)0.423
Resting pulse (per minute)-0.024 (-0.042, 0.022)0.546-0.002 (-0.047, 0.043)0.936
Hip circumference (cm)0.280 (0.001, 0.301)0.050*-0.276 (-0.487, -0.064)0.011*
Tanner staging0.004 (-0.084, 0.094)0.9090.772 (-0.370, 1.914)0.184
Abdominal obesity/waist circumference-0.546 (-0.338, -0.139)<0.001*-3.186 (-5.967, -0.406)0.025*
Females
Weight (kg)0.268 (-0.007, 0.228)0.050*0.175 (0.057, 0.293)0.004*
Height (cm)0.168 (0.055, 0.209)0.001*0.132 (0.060, 0.204)<0.001*
Ethnicity-0.092 (-1.308, -0.091)0.024-0.166 (-0.679, 0.347)0.525
Right hand span-0.036 (-0.586, 0.348)0.618-0.301 (-0.792, 0.189)0.228
Left hand span0.158 (0.049, 0.993)0.031*0.621 (-0.014, 1.257)0.055
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)-0.063 (-0.067, 0.016)0.231-0.016 (-0.057, 0.025)0.436
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)-0.034 (-0.061, 0.030)0.499-0.016 (-0.063, 0.030)0.487
Resting pulse (per minute)-0.005 (-0.030, 0.026)0.896-0.008 (-0.040, 0.023)0.613
Hip circumference (cm)0.222 (-0.008, 0.230)0.066-0.024 (-0.145, 0.097)0.698
Tanner staging0.047 (-0.199, 0.711)0.2690.002 (-0.780, 0.784)0.996
Abdominal obesity/ waist circumference-0.264 (-0.234, -0.030)0.011*-3.057 (-5.467, -0.647)0.013*

Model 1 is the unadjusted results. Model 2 is adjusted for weight, height, ethnicity, right hand span, left hand span, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, resting pulse, hip circumference, Tanner staging and abdominal obesity. *Significant at p<0.05


Discussion

Handgrip strength can be influenced by several factors that include age, gender, puberty, hand size and grip span [8]. In this study, the handgrip strength for Malaysian adolescents was lower than the adolescents from the western countries [9,10]. This may be due to the differences in this population age whereby Malaysian adolescents were aged 13 years and Americans (12 to 15 years) and [Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence, HELENA) (13 to 18 years). A study by McComas MJ et al., has shown the muscle strength changes as human is ageing [11]. In addition, it appears that obesity can impact the hangrip strength but it could not be ascertained whether the force was due to muscle quality or muscle mass [12]. Gender also does play an effect modifier on muscle strength during adolescence. Male does experiences growth spurt in muscle mass between 5 and 16-year-old from 42 to 54% of body mass. Whilst female’ muscle mass increases from 40 to 45% of body mass between 5 to 13-years and subsequently declines because of increased in fat mass during adolescence [13]. Another observation study found that there is differences in term of muscle strength based on gender. Their adolescent males had greater growth magnitude of muscle strength and it happen earlier than females while the females’ muscle strength begin to slow down at the age of 17-years [14]. In view of all the above mentioned, we have analysed the models based on gender separately.

The study has shown that abdominal obesity or WC in male and female adolescents is highly associated with muscle strength. The significant negative association between WC and muscle strength were also found in other studies [5,10]. These findings are parallel to the HELENA study, whereby greater upper body muscular strength in adolescents was consistently associated with higher levels of abdominal obesity [10]. Nevertheless, it was not clear whether the muscle mass or muscle quality that influence HGS. Anthropometric parameters such as weight, height and central obesity were also found to significantly predict muscle strength in female adolescents whereas in male adolescents, weight and HC were significantly associated. The strengths of the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team (MyHeARTs) study is due to its large adolescents’ cohort and for being the first to investigate muscle strength of Asian adolescents.

Limitation

Nevertheless, this analysis used the first wave data of the cross sectional study, the temporal relationship could not be ascertained. It is unclear if the disproportionate sample among males and females may cause error in validity but the proportion from current study is similar to other published cohort studies.

Conclusion

This study provides that the prediction of handgrip strength for Malaysian male and female adolescents. Adolescents’ weight and WC are correlated with their handgrip strength.

Declaration

Informed consent: Participation in the study was voluntary and written informed consent and ascent for participation in the study was obtained from the parents or guardian as well as the participants.

Funding: University of Malaya Research Program Grant 022-14HTM and University of Malaya Specialist Centre grant cycle 1-2016 and all the school children who participated in this study. The funding bodies did not contribute to the design of the study, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.

Model 1 is the unadjusted results. Model 2 is adjusted for weight, height, ethnicity, right hand span, left hand span, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, resting pulse, hip circumference, Tanner staging and abdominal obesity. *Significant at p<0.05

References

[1]Hairi NN, Cumming RG, Naganathan V, Handelsman DJ, Le Couteur DG, Creasey H, Loss of muscle strength, mass (sarcopenia), and quality (specific force) and its relationship with functional limitation and physical disability: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project J Am Geriatr Soc 2010 58(11):2055-62.10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03145.x21054284  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Sayer AA, Syddall HE, Martin HJ, Dennison EM, Roberts HC, Cooper C, Is grip strength associated with health-related quality of life? Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study Age Ageing 2006 35(4):409-15.10.1093/ageing/afl02416690636  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Stenholm S, Sallinen J, Koster A, Rantanen T, Sainio P, Heliövaara M, Koskinen S, Association between obesity history and hand grip strength in older adults-exploring the roles of inflammation and insulin resistance as mediating factors J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011 66(3):341-48.10.1093/gerona/glq22621310808  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Ramos-Sepúlveda JA, Ramírez-Vélez R, Correa-Bautista JE, Izquierdo M, García-Hermoso A, Physical fitness and anthropometric normative values among Colombian-Indian schoolchildren BMC Public Health 2016 16(1):96210.1186/s12889-016-3652-227619491  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Jiménez-Pavón D, Ortega FB, Valtuena J, Castro-Piñero J, Gómez-Martínez S, Zaccaria M, Muscular strength and markers of insulin resistance in European Journal of Applied Physiology 2012 112(7):2455-65.10.1007/s00421-011-2216-522052103  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Hazreen MA, Su TT, Jalaludin MY, Dahlui M, Chinna K, Ismail M, An exploratory study on risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases among adolescents in Malaysia: overview of the Malaysian Health and Adolescents Longitudinal Research Team study (The MyHeART study) BMC Public Health 2014 14(Suppl 3):S610.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S625437068  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Hamilton GF, McDonald C, Chenier TC, Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992 16(5):215-19.10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.21518796752  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Labayen I, Redondo C, Breidenassel C, Gómez S, High fitness is associated with a healthier programming of body composition at adolescence Am J Hum Biol 2008 20(6):732-34.10.1002/ajhb.2081318770529  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Ervin RB, Fryar CD, Wang CY, Miller IM, Ogden CL, Strength and body weight in US children and adolescents Pediatrics 2014 134(3):e78210.1542/peds.2014-079425157016  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Moliner-Urdiales D, Ruiz JR, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Ortega FB, Rey-Lopez JP, España-Romero V, Associations of muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness with total and central body fat in adolescents: the HELENA study Br J Sports Med 2011 45(2):101-08.10.1136/bjsm.2009.06243019696034  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]McComas AJ, Sica RE, Petito F, Muscle strength in boys of different ages J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973 36(2):171-73.10.1136/jnnp.36.2.1714708451  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Tomlinson DJ, Erskine RM, Morse CI, Winwood K, Onambélé-Pearson G, The impact of obesity on skeletal muscle strength and structure through adolescence to old age Biogerontology 2016 17(3):467-83.10.1007/s10522-015-9626-426667010  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Macfarlane DJ, Tomkinson GR, Evolution and variability in fitness test performance of Asian children and adolescents InPediatric Fitness 2007 Vol. 50Karger Publishers:143-167.10.1159/00010135817387256  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Silverman IW, The secular trend for grip strength in Canada and the United States J Sports Sci 2011 29(6):599-606.10.1080/02640414.2010.54720921391084  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]