JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/37907.13005
Year : 2019 | Month : Jul | Volume : 13 | Issue : 07 Full Version Page : EC01 - EC04

Diagnostic Yield of Post-mortem Needle Biopsies and their Spectrum: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital

Neha Nigam1, Niraj Kumari2, Narendra Krishnani3, Ranjana Ranade4

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Professor, Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Professor, Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Niraj Kumari, Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: nirajpath@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Introduction

Conventional autopsy provides important information regarding cause of death, clinico-pathological correlation and is a paramount source of learning. Developing countries have low acceptance rates, denial and limited accessibility for conventional autopsy. Needle autopsy has come up as an alternative to conventional autopsy.

Aim

Aim of the study was to analyse postmortem needle biopsies to gauge their utility in lending postmortem diagnosis as well as study its spectrum.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study and includes 334 patients. Different organs sampled were liver, lung, kidney, spleen, brain, heart, testis, lip and nose. Clinical data and histopathology slides were retrieved and reviewed by three pathologists.

Results

A total of 428 biopsies were received from 334 patients. Forty five (10.5%) biopsies from different organs were non representative. A definite diagnosis was offered in 304 biopsies with an overall diagnostic yield of 79.4%. Liver and kidney biopsies had the maximum diagnostic yield of 89.2% and 69.2%, respectively and most diagnostic category encountered were multiacinar necrosis and fungal infection respectively.

Major disagreement (Class 1 and Class 2) between clinical diagnosis and needle autopsy diagnosis was found to be in 21/334 cases (6.3%), where patient would potentially have survived if the clinical diagnosis had been correct.

Conclusion

Diagnostic dilemma is a wistful part of medical science. Postmortem needle biopsy has an important role in diagnosis making, improvising the quality of academics and patient care. Level of information and diagnostic yields are high with liver and kidney.

Keywords

Introduction

The cases which are difficult to diagnose or do not reach a definite diagnosis during life may be helped by conventional autopsy for reaching to a reasonable conclusion and can serve as a gold standard. This will provide necessary information regarding the cause of death, clinicopathological correlation and is a paramount source of learning. In developing countries like India an open autopsy is practiced in a very limited number of places.

Post-Mortem needle biopsy / Needle Autopsy can overcome many barriers that limit the use of conventional autopsies and have come up with several edges over known shortcomings of conventional autopsy [1]. Needle autopsy is a common modality in most of the academic institutes, and the supremacy is further attained; as it is fast, minimally invasive, inexpensive and more acceptable to patient’s relatives [2-4]. It has been used in various settings and for multiple speculations including increased acceptability, simplicity and decreased risk of disease transmission when compared to complete autopsies [5, 6]. This can also enable the safe collection of diagnostic material and successfully procure tissue for further pathological and molecular review [7].

The aim of this study was to review the spectrum of post-mortem needle biopsies in a tertiary care referral hospital where conventional autopsy is not practiced and find out the diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem needle autopsies in lending a diagnosis or cause of death.

Materials and Methods

All retrospective cases of post-mortem needle biopsies received between January 2010 and December 2015 in the Department of Pathology, SGPIMS, Lucknow, India were included in the study. Biopsies were unguided and performed per-cutaneously with 16G Tru-Cut needle by clinicians. Samples were fixed in 10% formalin; sent to pathology department and processed as for routine histopathology specimens.

Single or multiple biopsies from different organs were done, included liver, lung, kidney, spleen, brain, heart, testis, lip and nose; as a different protocol by various departments. Histopathology is a gold standard in many conditions. In post-mortem scenario, needle autopsy or conventional autopsy with clinicopathological correlation is the only way to reach diagnosis and cause of death. Review of all the histopathology slides by three histopathologists (NN, RM, and NiK) specialised in this field has been done along with clinico-radiological correlation. In this study, post-mortem biopsy was performed for diffuse pathologies. So biopsy from a single site is also considered as diagnostic.

Results

A total of 428 biopsies were received from 334 patients; out of which single organ biopsies were from 270 cases (81.4%), and multiple organ biopsies were from 64 cases (18.6%). One hundred sixty-three cases (48.8%) were of pediatric age group (age range <1 to 18 years) out of which 11 children (2.5%) were less than one year of age. The overall mean and median age was 27 years and 20 years (range -9 months to 80 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.6:1 (206 males, 128 females). Forty-five (10.5%) biopsies from different organs were non-representative. Rest of the 383 (89.5%) biopsies were evaluated, with a sampling accuracy rate of nearly 90%. A definite diagnosis was offered in 304 biopsies with an overall diagnostic yield of 79.4%. In 79 (20.6%) biopsies, a morphological description was provided as the biopsies showed mostly normal morphology of the parent tissue. The details of the anatomic site with a total number of biopsies performed and diagnostic accuracy are given in [Table/Fig-1].

Details of anatomic sites with total number of biopsies performed and diagnostic yield.

SiteTotal no. of bxDiagnostc biopsyNormal morphologyNon-representativeDiagnostic yield
Liver284 (66.3%)24830689.20%
Lung55 (12.8%)19191750%
Kidney39 (9.1%)1881369.2
Brain20 (4.6%)68642.8%
Spleen13 (3%)65254.5%
Bone marrow3 (0.7%)11150%
Muscle2 (0.5%)11050%
Abdominal mass1 (0.2%)100100%
Colon2 (0.5%)0200
Heart1 (0.2%)0100
Lip2 (0.5%)0200
Skin4 (0.9%)22050%
Stomach2 (0.5%)200100%

In the present study, liver and kidney biopsies had the maximum overall diagnostic yield after excluding non-representative biopsies of 89.2% and 69.2%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy in infants were also found to be high in liver (86.4%) and kidney (71.8%). Abdominal mass and stomach had one biopsy each which were diagnostic. Lung (50%), spleen (54.5%) and brain (42.8%) had a diagnostic yield of around 50%.

Most common diagnoses encountered in liver was of multiacinar necrosis, in the kidney it was a fungal infection and thrombotic microangiopathy and in the lung was that of alveolar hemorrhage. The diagnostic spectrum of post-mortem liver, kidney and lung biopsies was tabulated in [Table/Fig-2,3 and 4] respectively.

Diagnostic spectrum of post-mortem liver biopsies.

Diagnostic entitiesNumber of biopsies
Acute hepatitis35
Acute viral hepatitis5
Autoimmune hepatitis7 (1 necrosis, 1 bridging fibrosis)
HBV related hepatitis2
HCV related hepatitis1
Cholestatic liver disease16
Extrahepatic biliary atresia4
PFIC2
PILBD2
Neonatal hepatitis1
Metabolic liver disease (GSD)5
Niemen Pick disease1
Indian childhood cirrhosis2
Wilsons disease3
Drug induced liver disease (DILI)1
Steatohepatitis4
Malarial hepatitis1
Cryptococcus1
Histoplasmosis1
Tuberculosis4
Amyloidosis2
Multiacinar necrosis100
Passive venous congestion4
Lymphoma6
Hepatocellular carcinoma1
Hepatoblastoma1
Metastatic carcinoma3
Cirrhosis33 [Cryptogenic (21); Autoimmune (6); Wilson disease (3); Alcoholic (1); EHBA (1); HBV related (1)]

HBV: Hepatitis B virus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; EHBA: Extrahepatic biliary atresia; PFIC: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis; PILBD: Paucity of intralobular bile duct


Diagnostic spectrum of postmortem kidney biopsies (n=18).

Diagnostic entitiesNumber of biopsies
Acute tubular necrosis3
Crescentic glomerulonephritis1
Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis3
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis1
Focal proliferative glomerulonephritis1
Tubulointerstitial nephritis1
Fungal infection4
Thrombotic microangiopathy4

Diagnostic spectrum of postmortem lung biopsies (n=19).

Diagnostic entitiesNumber of biopsies
Alveolar hemorrhage6
Bronchopneumonia2
Fungal infection1
Hyaline membrane disease3
Interstial lung disease3
Metastatic carcinoma1
Tuberculosis1
Pulmonary edema2

The sampling adequacy was high for single organ biopsy (95.5%) with 12 of 270 cases being inadequate than multiple organ biopsy (84.2%) where 25 of 158 cases were insufficient. Provisional clinical diagnosis was provided by clinicians and disparity with pathological diagnosis was also ascertained. Goldman L et al., classified discrepancies into four categories [8].

Class 1: a discrepant diagnosis with a potential impact on survival

Class 2: a major discrepant diagnosis but with equivocal or no impact on survival

Class 3: a minor discrepant diagnosis that could have been diagnosed before death

Class 4: a discrepant minor diagnosis that could not have been made before death

In our study, major disagreement (Class 1 and Class 2) between clinical diagnosis and needle autopsy diagnosis was found to be in 21/334 cases (6.3%), where the patient would potentially have survived if the clinical diagnosis had been made antemortem [Table/Fig-5,6].

Disagreement diagnoses (n=4).

Anatomic siteClinical dagnosisDisagreement diagnosis
LiverLymphomatous infiltrateMultiacinar necrosis
LiverMetabolic liver diseaseLymphomatous infiltrate
KidneyChronic kidney disease, DiabetesCrescentic glomerulonephritis
KidneyHenoch Schoenlen purpuraMembranoproliferative glomerulonephritis

Surprise diagnoses (n=21).

Anatomic siteClinical diagnosisSurprise diagnosis
BrainTubercular meningitisCryptococcal meningitis
KidneyPerinephric haematoma,Fungal infection (Mucormycosis)
KidneyHUS, APLAFungal infection (Mucormycosis)
KidneyAplastic anaemiaThrombotic microangiopathy
KidneyRenal infarctFungal infection (Mucormycosis)
KidneySeptic shock, MODSHistoplasmosis
LiverAcute liver failure, hepatomegalyLymphoproliferative disorder
LiverAlcoholic liver diseaseMetastatic carcinoma
LiverMetabolic liver diseasePaucity of bile duct
LiverHepatomegaly, liver failureHistiocytic infiltrative disorder
LiverGlycoge storage disorder, hepatomegalyHepatoblastoma
LiverRheumatoid arthritis, methotrexate intoxicationGranulomatous inflammation
LiverPain abdomen, hepatomegalyMetastatic carcinoma
LiverAcute pancreatitisLymphoproliferative disorder
LiverInflammatory myositis, hepatomegaly (liver sols)Metastatic carcinoma
LiverThalassemia majorNiemann pick disease
LiverSLE, right lobar pneumoniatuberculosis
LiverSepsitic shockHistoplasmosis
LungBronchopneumonia, Chronic renal failureMetastatic carcinoma
LungSLE, AILDTuberculosis
SpleenSeptic shock, MODSHistoplasmosis

Discussion

Post-Mortem needle biopsy/needle Autopsy has been used in various settings and for many speculations including increased acceptability, simplicity and decreased risk of disease transmission when compared to complete autopsies [2-4].

Twenty-year study (1948-1968) of 394 post-mortem cases, evaluated by Wellmann K et al., with 357 multiple site biopsies and 37 limited organ biopsy showed high inadequacy rates of 22.8%. The success rate was high for liver (92%) followed by the kidney (34%) [2]. Celiloglu OS et al., found much higher inadequacy rates of 36.3%; in 247 neonatal post-mortem needle biopsies; from 76 neonates; reason being smaller organs and less experienced staff [9]. The sampling inadequacy rate in the present study was much less (9.6%); compared to other studies. High adequacy rate in our study showed more top technical experience, skilled personals; mainly include single organ or limited organ biopsy and predominance of the adult population with larger organs. A large number of non-representative cases belonged to lung and kidney. Procedures are unguided; thus deeply seated organ kidney has low adequacy rate. Guided (USG/MRI/CT) procedures will help in dealing with this. Lack of experience will lead to high inadequacy rate in obtaining lung biopsy and usually contained pleural tissue only. A deeper and tru-cut biopsy is advised.

The bulk of the cases include liver (66.7%), lung (12.9%) and kidney (9.1%) biopsies. As post-mortem needle biopsies are not performed as a protocol in our institute, thus various departments have different criteria to carry out post-mortem needle biopsies. The procedure has been performed only by few departments such as gastroenterology, nephrology and critical care medicine which are an important reason for high sample rates from these departments resulting in sample variability.

The tissues such as liver and kidney are solid organs and are commonly investigated during the ante mortem phase and have a good diagnostic yield. The other tissues such as muscle, skin, lung, and GIT yield mostly tissues with non-specific findings, and brain tissue gets autolyzed if not fixed rapidly yielding non-specific findings. Primary constrain with needle autopsy is high false negativity rate particularly when the lesion is localised. This may lead to sampling error of both the target organ and the target lesion. In such cases, open autopsy or guided needle autopsy is more fruitful.

There will always be a possibility of missed vital pathologies with single organ needle biopsy which has similar connotations as in ante-mortem biopsies. Focal lesion/mass lesion can be identified by clinical and radiological examination during life Those lesions can be targeted during post mortem based on the antemortem imaging.

The cases with diffuse pathology have a lower chance of being missed on needle biopsy. Post-mortem biopsy was performed from a single site mostly for diffuse pathologies in the present study. Therefore we suggest performing multiple site biopsies in case of focal lesions to improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Smaller studies in various adult populations have shown successful biopsy rates of 98-100% for the liver, 76-94% for the lungs, 50-100% for the heart and 10-80% for the kidneys [3,4,10].

We found the diagnostic yield, highest in liver (89.2%) followed by the kidney (69.2%) and lung (50%). Biopsies from bone marrow, heart, colon, stomach, muscle, skin, and lip in the present study were very small in number, and the majority of them showed unremarkable morphology. Being a tertiary care center and dealing with severe, complex cases, most of the pathologies may involve liver and kidney. Some of the departments follow the protocol of doing postmortem biopsies from organs such as liver, lung, kidney and spleen, therefore, we are getting post mortem biopsies from lung, liver, kidney, brain, and spleen. Most of the organs are uninvolved, and pathology will be limited to the Liver and Kidney only.

Most successful post-mortem needle biopsy studies in newborns were from the liver (92%) and lung (84%), due to their superficial location, as studied by Garg S et al., [11]. A comparative study between minimal invasive autopsy and conventional autopsy in 44 fetal and neonatal cases showed most successful post-mortem needle biopsy was from the lung (86%) and liver (76%) [12]. We had 163 patients of the paediatric age group (age range <1 to 18 years) out of which 11 were infants (2.5%). Diagnostic yield was high in liver (89.2%) and kidney (61.2%).

The diagnosis offered on needle autopsy may not be the sole cause of death but may be helpful in the assessing diseases commonly affecting the visceral organs (lung, kidney, liver, etc,). Reported success rates to obtain tissue vary widely depending on the organ involved. This study shows that needle biopsies of the liver and kidney obtained in post-mortem patients are more diagnostic than other organ biopsies such as lung, spleen, and brain [13, 14].

This will serve as upper hand for histopathological, microbiological, immunological and molecular studies. Conceiving the idea that relatives often refuse to give consent for post mortem investigation, mainly because of the mutilation due to conventional autopsy, Van der Linden A et al., did a prospective study by performing a Minimally Invasive Autopsy (MIA) in 24 cases. They measured tissue quality for molecular studies and found MIA samples showed better RNA quality than conventional autopsy samples, probably due to the shorter post-mortem interval. This will again solidify our hypothesis of performing needle autopsy in institutes where a conventional autopsy has not done for better patient care in the future [15].

Twenty three (23) biopsies were found where post-mortem needle biopsy played a significant role. Four cases showed discrepancy with had clinical diagnosis, and 19 biopsies surprise diagnosis, some of which if diagnosed in antemortem, could have been treated antemortem.

Many studies were done in the past reflecting the disparity between clinical and autopsy diagnosis where the patient would potentially have survived if the clinical diagnosis had been correct. Shojania KG et al., conducted a systematic literature search from 1966 to 2002 and identified 45 studies reporting 53 distinct autopsy series meeting prospectively defined criteria. The median discrepancy rates were 23.5% (range, 4.1%-49.8%). All these studies performed complete clinical autopsies to establish autopsy diagnoses [16]. Bansal MG et al., prospectively studied the correlation between clinical diagnosis and needle autopsy diagnosis despite conventional autopsy in 50 cases from the emergency department with a discrepancy rate of 32% [17].

In our study, needle autopsy was done in place of a complete autopsy, and the discrepancy for major errors noted was just 6.3% as opposed to other studies where error varied between 10-60% [Table/Fig-7] [8,11,17-21]. Being a super-specialty institute, skilled staff, experienced clinicians and integrated approach towards diagnosis may account for the low rate of major diagnostic discrepancies.

Cases where the patient would potentially have survived if the clinical diagnosis had been correct [8,11,17-21].

AuthorYearNumber of patientsType of AutopsyDiscripancy (%)Group of patients
Goldman L et al. [8]1983300Open, Invasive10.3All
Mercer J et al., [18]1985400Open, Invasive13Adults
Battle RM et al., [19]19872067Open, Invasive13.2All
Shanks JH et al., [20]1990213Open, Invasive20.6Perioperative deaths
Bernicker EH et al., [21]1993152Open, Invasive10Medical Patients
Garg S et al., [11]200925Needle autopsy, Minimally Invasive60Neonates
Bansal MG et al., [17]201550Needle autopsy, Minimally Invasive32Emergency patients
Present Study2017334Needle autopsy, Minimally Invasive6.3All

Many known lesions are diagnosed in conventional autopsy which is essential for learning but not for usual pathological diagnosis. In some cases ante-mortem biopsies are not a routine procedure such as acute hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, etc., however the post-mortem biopsies available in these cases form an important source of learning for pathology residents [22].

Limitation

It is a retrospective study, therefore adherence to hospital records and biopsy records of patients.

Being a super specialty tertiary care center, we deal with severe and complicated cases, so may not reflect the deaths in other hospitals in India.

No comparison was done between needle autopsy and conventional autopsy.

Not having fixed protocol for post-mortem biopsies.

Conclusion

Post-Mortem needle biopsy is an important tool to reach at a diagnosis and determine cause of death where conventional autopsy is a limitation. The diagnostic yield and diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem needle biopsies were 79.4% and 93.2% respectively; in the present study. Surprise diagnosis was seen in 5.4% cases where either there was no diagnosis ante-mortem or the diagnosis changed post-mortem. The idea behind this study was to audit our post-mortem needle biopsy sampling to evaluate its utility.

It improves the decision making in future cases and lends a cause of death, thereby improving quality of patient care and teaching.

Future recommendation: We suggest the practice of post-mortem needle biopsies to be practiced in places where conventional autopsy is a limitation. Radiologically guided needle biopsies may further reduce inadequacy rates.

HBV: Hepatitis B virus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; EHBA: Extrahepatic biliary atresia; PFIC: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis; PILBD: Paucity of intralobular bile duct

References

[1]Terry R, Needle necropsy Journal of clinical pathology 1955 8(1):38-41.10.1136/jcp.8.1.3814354026  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Wellmann K, The needle autopsy. A retrospective evaluation of 394 consecutive cases Am J Clin Pathol 1969 52(4):441-44.10.1093/ajcp/52.4.4415820973  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Guerra I, Ortiz E, Portu J, Atares B, Aldamiz-Etxebarria M, De Pablos M, Value of limited necropsy in HIV-positive patients Pathol Res Pract 2001 197(3):165-68.10.1078/0344-0338-0002811314779  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Foroudi F, Cheung K, Duflou J, A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy Pathology 1995 27(1):79-82.10.1080/003130295001695327603760  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Baumgart KW, Cook M, Quin J, Painter D, Gatenby PA, Garsia RJ, The limited (needle biopsy) autopsy and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome Pathology 1994 26(2):141-43.10.1080/003130294001693818090586  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Rosenbaum GE, Burns J, Johnson J, Mitchell C, Robinson M, Truog RD, Autopsy consent practice at US teaching hospitals: results of a national survey Arch Intern Med 2000 160(3):374-80.10.1001/archinte.160.3.37410668840  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Marsden PD, Needle autopsy Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 1997 30(2):161-62.10.1590/S0037-868219970002000129107135  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M, The value of the autopsy in three medical eras N Engl J Med 1983 308(17):1000-05.10.1056/NEJM1983042830817046835306  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Celiloglu OS, Celiloglu C, Kurnaz E, Ozdemir R, Karadag A, Diagnostic contribution of postmortem needle biopsies in neonates Turk Patoloji Dergisi 2013 29(2):122-26.10.5146/tjpath.2013.0116223661349  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Huston BM, Malouf NN, Azar HA, Percutaneous needle autopsy sampling Mod pathol 1996 9(12):1101-07.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Garg S, Punia RP, Basu S, Mohan H, Bal A, Comparison of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates Fetal and Pediatric Pathology 2009 28(3):139-50.10.1080/1551381090277248219365742  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Whitehead AL, Set PA, Berman L, Hackett GA, Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy Virchows Archiv: an international journal of pathology 2008 452(2):201-07.10.1007/s00428-007-0548-718087719  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Wagoner GP, Ulevitch H, Abernathy EL, Gall EA, Schiff L, Correlation of the results of needle biopsy of the liver with autopsy findings J Lab Clin Med 1950 36(6):1000-01.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Kellow WF, Cotsonas NJ Jr, Chomet B, Zimmerman HJ, Evaluation of the adequacy of needle-biopsy specimens of the kidney: an autopsy study Arch Intern Med 1959 104:353-59.10.1001/archinte.1959.0027009000700214405282  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]van der Linden A, Blokker BM, Kap M, Weustink AC, Robertus JL, Riegman PH, Post-mortem tissue biopsies obtained at minimally invasive autopsy: an RNA-quality analysis PloS one 2014 9(12):e11567510.1371/journal.pone.011567525531551  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L, Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review JAMA 2003 289(21):2849-56.10.1001/jama.289.21.284912783916  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Bansal MG, Punia RS, Sachdev A, Clinical and needle autopsy correlation evaluation in a tertiary care teaching hospital: a prospective study of 50 cases from the emergency department Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2012 33(3):194-96.10.1097/PAF.0b013e31823d295e22543521  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Mercer J, Talbot IC, Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s Postgraduate Medical Journal 1985 61(718):713-16.10.1136/pgmj.61.718.7134034461  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Battle RM, Pathak D, Humble CG, Key CR, Vanatta PR, Hill RB, Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses JAMA 1987 258(3):339-44.10.1001/jama.1987.034000300550313599326  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Shanks JH, McCluggage G, Anderson NH, Toner PG, Value of the necropsy in perioperative deaths J Clin Pathol 1990 43(3):193-95.10.1136/jcp.43.3.1932332514  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Bernicker EH, Atmar RL, Schaffner DL, Greenberg SB, Unanticipated diagnoses found at autopsy in an urban public teaching hospital Am J Med Sci 1996 311(5):215-20.10.1016/S0002-9629(15)41698-2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[22]Weustink AC, Hunink MG, van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW, Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology 2009 250(3):897-904.10.1148/radiol.250308042119244053  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]