JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Dentistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/41518.12951
Year : 2019 | Month : Jun | Volume : 13 | Issue : 06 Full Version Page : ZC36 - ZC40

Investigation of ABO Blood Groups in Periodontal Status and its Effect on Level of Response to Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment

Mhd Ammar Kouki1, Ali Abou Sulaiman2, Mohammad Tawfik Kouki3, Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh4

1 MSc, Department of Periodontology, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
2 PhD, Department of Periodontology, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
3 DDS, Department of Periodontology, Damascus University, South Windsor, Connecticut, USA.
4 PhD, Department of Periodontology, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Mhd Ammar Kouki, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University, Mazzeh Highway, Damascus, Syria.
E-mail: koukyammar@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

ABO blood groups have been associated with several systemic diseases. Various studies have investigated the relationship between ABO blood groups and periodontal diseases.

Aim

The purposes of this study were to assess the possible association between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with periodontal status, and to determine whether the level of response to scaling and root planing would vary based on the patient’s blood phenotype.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1009 subjects participated in this cross-divtional study and were allocated into three groups, healthy participants, with gingivitis and with periodontitis. Furthermore, sixty patients from the periodontitis group with generalised chronic periodontitis were further divided into four groups according to their blood phenotypes to participate in the divond stage of the study. Blood sample were collected using the finger prick technique and the direct agglutination method was used to determine the blood group. Chi-square test was used to investigate the association between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with periodontal status, and One-Way ANOVA was chosen to assess the level of response to scaling and root planing based on the participant’s blood group.

Results

A higher incidence of gingivitis was found in patients with blood group A whereas a higher incidence of periodontitis was found in patients with blood group O. In addition, a higher incidence of periodontitis followed by gingivitis was found in Rh positive patients. Regarding the effect of ABO blood groups on nonsurgical periodontal therapy, there was no significant difference between the four groups.

Conclusion

A and O blood groups and Rh positive are possible risk factors for periodontal disease, and the level of response to scaling and root planing does not differ according the blood group.

Keywords

Introduction

Periodontitis is characterised by a rapid tissue destruction that includes both soft and hard tissues. It is a prevalent disease that affects a huge proportion of populations all over the world [1]. Although bacteria is considered the main cause of periodontal diseases, studies have elucidated its multifaceted nature [2]. Factors such as smoking, diabetes and genetics play a role in the progress of the disease [3]. Chronic Periodontitis (CP) is the most common form of periodontitis, it mainly affects those who are over the age of 35, but can be seen in children. The main characteristics of chronic periodontitis are plaque accumulation, inflammation of the periodontium and loss of attachment and alveolar bone. It might be localised (less than 30% of the teeth) or generalised (more than 30% of the teeth), and can be described based on the severity of the disease as mild, moderate or severe [4].

In year 1901, Karl Landsteiner introduced the ABO blood groups, segregating people into three groups A, B and O based on the possibility of the red blood cells to be clustered when they are mixed with serum from other people. Later, a fourth group was discovered, which is AB. This blood group system is dependent on whether an erythrocyte expresses on its surface (one, two, or neither antigens). Erythrocytes that carry the antigen A, or B, or both, fall into the blood groups of A, B, AB respectively, while the lack of manifesting either antigens results in O phenotype. Individuals who do not carry A or B antigens on their erythrocytes have antibodies to the antigens they lack in their serum. In addition to being expressed on the surface of red blood cells, these antigens can be distributed in the body of most people in the form of glycoproteins dissolved in the secretors of the body like saliva [5].

Although the four phenotypes of the ABO blood group system can be observed in all human populations, the frequency of each type varies considerably among people based on their geographical region. It was established that the percentage of individuals with blood group O exceeds 60% in Africa, Australia and among native Americans, and this percentage may rise to 100% among individuals from South and Central America. Conversely, the phenotype A is the most prevalent in Europe with 40-60%, whereas phenotype B is the least common with 8-12% [6].

Another important blood group system is the Rhesus (Rh) system. According to this system, erythrocytes could be either positive (Rh-D+) if they present the Rh antigen, or negative (Rh-D-) if they lack this antigen [7]. It was reported that 85% of European and 99% of Asians are (Rh-D+) [6].

Over the past few decades, studies have been examining the possible relationship between ABO blood groups and systemic conditions. A study by Whincup P et al., has demonstrated that individuals with blood group A have a higher risk of ischemic heart disease compared to individuals of other groups [8]. Similarly, Roberts JF found that individuals with blood group A are more susceptible to gallstones and colitis [9]. On a parallel note, Mortazavi H et al., reported that people with blood group B are more prone to cancer [10]. Another study has shown that subjects with blood group B have a higher chance of developing type 2 diabetes, and those with blood group O have a lower chance to develop this condition [11].

Nonetheless, several studies have focused on the potential relationship between ABO blood groups and periodontal diseases. However, results obtained from these studies showed a lot of discrepancies. Some studies indicated that gingivitis was more prevalent in subjects with blood group A and periodontitis was more prevalent in subjects with blood group O, these studies also concluded that there was a relationship between gingivitis and Rh positive patients [12,13]. Moreover, Koregol AC et al., also reported similar findings, but they found no relationship between Rh factor and periodontal diseases [14]. A study by Patel R et al., showed that individuals with blood group B and O and those who are Rh positive have a higher tendency to develop periodontitis [15]. In contrast, a study carried out by Francis DL et al., reported that there is no significant relationship between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with periodontal diseases [16].

As aforementioned, the possible relationship between ABO blood groups and periodontal status has been under the scope of many researchers, and in present study, it was decided to take it a step further and investigate whether ABO blood groups have a role in the response to the conventional periodontal therapy. Recently, some studies in medicine have examined the response to treatment and prognosis of cancer patients according to their blood phenotypes. A study by Cihan YB, has concluded that breast cancer patients with A and O blood phenotypes who underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy had higher overall survival and disease-free survival compared to patients with other blood phenotypes [17]. Besides, Li Q et al., reported that ABO blood groups have a prognostic role in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated by trans arterial chemoembolization. Their findings were that non-O blood phenotypes patients, especially patients with AB phenotype, had worse overall survival compared with blood phenotype O [18]. Notwithstanding, Unal D et al., found that ABO blood groups had no effect on prognosis and response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer [19].

The purpose of this study was to analyse the potential association between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with the periodontal status, and to determine whether the level of response to scaling and root planing would vary based on the patient’s blood phenotype.

The null hypothesis: there is no statistically significant association between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with the periodontal status, and there is no statistically significant difference between level of response to scaling and root planing and ABO blood groups.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study lasted 10 months, between January 2018 and October 2018, and it was carried out to determine if there is an association between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with periodontitis. Convenience Sampling was done and the study included 1009 subjects, 566 males and 443 females who aged between 20-65 years and visited the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University seeking either periodontal therapy or other treatments after acquiring ethical clearance from Damascus University and the patients’ written consents were taken to participate in the study.

The selection criteria were that the subjects had at least 20 teeth excluding the third molars, similar socio-economic backgrounds, no systemic disease, such as leukaemia, diabetes, metallic bone disease, whereas those who were smokers, alcoholics, pregnant females, individuals who underwent periodontal treatment or antibiotic therapy within the past six months and individuals who cannot perform routine oral hygiene were excluded. After obtaining complete dental and medical histories, participants were divided into three groups; group I (healthy), group II (gingivitis), group III (periodontitis). Healthy participants showed attachment loss ≤3 mm, periodontal pocket depth ≤3 mm and no clinical sign of gingivitis [1]. Those with gingivitis displayed a attachment loss ≤3 mm, periodontal pocket depth ≤3 mm and sign of gingivitis according to Löe H et al., index (redness, bleeding, change in gingival contour, absence of the stippling texture) [20]. Periodontitis group included participants who showed attachment loss ≥4 mm, periodontal pocket depth ≥4 mm and radiographic bone loss. The following clinical periodontal parameters were recorded using William’s periodontal probe: plaque index PI [21], gingival index GI [20], gingival bleeding index GBI [22] probing depth PD [23] (the distance between the gingival margin and the bottom of the pocket) and Clinical Attachment Loss CAL [23] (the distance between the cementoenamel junction and the bottom of the pocket).

Group I comprised 276 participants (78 males, 198 females).

Group II comprised 324 participants (206 males, 118 females).

Group III comprised 409 (282 males, 127 females).

Among group III patients, 60 of the participants who were classified as generalised chronic periodontitis patients were randomly selected to participate in the second stage of the study. However, patients included in this part of the study were only Rh-positive. In addition, the study was registered at clinical trials with registration number (NCT03644901).

The patients were allocated into the following four groups, 15 in each:

Group (III A) patients with blood group A and possessed the Rh factor.

Group (III O) patients with blood group O and possessed the Rh factor.

Group (III B) patients with blood group B and possessed the Rh factor.

Group (III AB) patients with blood group AB and possessed the Rh factor.

The inclusion criteria for participants were those who demonstrated the generalized form of chronic periodontitis (more than 30% of the teeth showed attachment loss ≥4 mm and periodontal pocket depth 4-6 mm).

The following clinical periodontal parameter were recorded at baseline and three months after treatment using William’s periodontal probe: Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), Probing Depth (PD), Relative Attachment Level (RAL) [23] (distance between a prefabricated acrylic stent and the bottom of the pocket). All patients received supragingival plaque and calculus removal at the first visit, followed by scaling and root planing using manual scalers and curettes, CK6, U15 and Standard Gracey Curettes 5-6, 7-8, 11-12, 13-14 (Medesy, Italy), at the second visit. Also, chlorhexidine gluconate 0.12% mouthwash was prescribed twice a day for all patients and instructions of Modified Bass Brushing Technique were given. The above mentioned treatments were performed by the same practitioner at all time.

Blood samples were collected by finger prick technique using a disposable lancet, and blood samples were mixed with monoclonal antibodies, Anti A, Anti B, Anti D (G. Sanguineo, Spinreact, Spain) to determine the blood group based on the direct agglutination method. Forming a clump with Anti A denotes the presence of antigen A on the erythrocytes; thus blood group A and forming a clump with Anti B denotes the presence of antigen B on the erythrocytes; thus blood group B, while forming a clump with both antigens A and B denotes the presence of both antigens on the erythrocytes; thus blood group AB and the absence of a clump with both antibodies indicates that the erythrocytes present no antigen; thus, blood group O. Moreover, forming a clump with Anti D suggests that the erythrocytes are Rh positive.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed using statistical software (IBM SPSS Statistics version 22). Chi-square test was used to assess the data to determine whether there is an association between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with the periodontal status, and Z-score with Bonferroni adjustment were used to eradicate type 1 error and determine which percentage is significant. Paired t-test was used to compare the differences in clinical parameters at baseline and three months after the treatment in each group. One-Way ANOVA with Tukey test were the chosen tests to assess the response to scaling and root planing among individuals with different blood phenotypes. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results

This cross-sectional study lasted for 10 months, during which 1009 participants were examined to determine whether there exists a relationship between ABO blood groups and Rh factor with the periodontal status. Blood group A was the most prevalent (42.1%), among the participant population, followed by blood group O (33.9%), blood group B (15.7%) and blood group AB (8.3%). Rh positive participants constituted the majority of the study population (91.4%) and Rh negative accounted for the minority of the study population (8.6%) [Table/Fig-1].

Frequency of ABO blood group and Rh factor in study population.

Blood groupsTotal
AOBAB
n425342158841009
%42.10%33.90%15.70%8.30%100.0%
Rh factor
Rh positiveRh negative
n922871009
%91.4%8.6%100%

The study population was made up of (27.3%) healthy subjects, (32.1%) with gingivitis and (40.6%) with periodontitis [Table/Fig-2]. It is evident from [Table/Fig-2] that there is an association between ABO blood groups and periodontal diseases, (p<0.05). Subjects with blood group A exhibited a higher percentage of gingivitis (45.9%) with a significant difference compared to those with periodontitis and healthy periodontium. Likewise, a higher percentage of periodontitis was found in blood group O subjects (57.9%) with a significant difference compared to subjects with gingivitis and healthy periodontium. Subjects with blood group B showed a higher percentage of healthy periodontium (46.2%) with a significant difference compared to periodontitis and gingivitis groups. Furthermore, subjects with blood group AB demonstrated a relatively high percentage of healthy patients (40.5%) with significant difference compared to gingivitis patients and no significant difference compared to periodontitis patients.

Frequency of ABO blood groups in healthy, gingivitis and periodontitis participants.

Periodontal status
HealthyGingivitisPeriodontitis
Blood groupsAn98a195b132a
%23.1%45.9%31.1%
On71a73a198b
%20.8%21.3%57.9%
Bn73a36b49b
%46.2%22.8%31.0%
ABn34a20b30a, b
%40.5%23.8%35.7%
Totaln276324409
%27.3%32.1%40.6%
χ2=116.496   p<0.001

Each similar subscript letter denotes a subset of periodontal status categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjustment). Chi-square test.


As for Rh factor, [Table/Fig-3] shows that there is an association between Rh factor and the periodontal status (p<0.05). Rh positive subjects showed a higher prevalence of periodontitis (40.3%) with a significant difference compared to healthy and gingivitis subjects, followed by gingivitis (34.3%) with a significant difference compared to healthy subjects.

Frequency of Rh factor in healthy, gingivitis, periodontitis participants.

Periodontal status
HealthyGingivitisPeriodontitis
Rh factorRh+n234a316b372c
%25.4%34.3%40.3%
Rh-n42a8b37c
%48.3%9.2%42.5%
χ2=30.899   p<0.001

Each similar subscript letter denotes a subset of periodontal status categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjustment). Chi-square test.


For determining the level of response to scaling and root planing and the blood groups, 60 patients with generalised chronic periodontitis participated in this study to investigate if ABO blood groups play a role in the response to scaling and root planing. The study population was composed of (56.7%) males and (43.3%) females [Table/Fig-4]. The mean of the age was 51±7 years.

Demographic characteristic of the study population.

Blood groupsnAge (years)Sex (% males)
A1547±766.7%
O1550±766.7%
B1552±840.0%
AB1554±653.3%
Total6051±756.7%

Scaling and root planing resulted in statistically significant improvements in all the clinical parameters three months after scaling and root planing in each blood group (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-5].

Mean±SD (standard deviation) for each group at baseline and at the follow-up visit.

Clinical parameterBlood groupMean±SD baselineMean±SD 3 monthsT valueDifference in means±SDp-value
Probing depthA4.53±0.482.49±0.5616.6722.03±0.47<0.001
O4.64±0.532.50±0.4932.2872.15±0.26<0.001
B4.85±0.642.56±0.4422.4262.30±0.40<0.001
AB4.79±0.612.44±0.4638.5432.35±0.24<0.001
Relative attachment levelA8.54±0.476.40±0.4631.1362.15±0.27<0.001
O8.68±0.536.55±0.5034.4892.13±0.24<0.001
B8.91±0.676.65±0.4724.0722.26±0.36<0.001
AB8.88±0.606.54±0.4339.0102.34±0.23<0.001
Plaque indexA1.89±0.180.90±0.2223.3020.99±0.16<.001
O1.86±0.200.92±0.1832.1190.94±0.11<0.001
B1.88±0.220.91±0.1929.0620.97±0.13<0.001
AB1.88±0.200.92±0.1828.1260.96±0.13<0.001
Gingival indexA1.87±0.210.90±0.2123.7600.97±0.16<0.001
O1.82±0.180.92±0.1821.8840.89±0.16<0.001
B1.86±0.210.84±0.1521.6421.02±0.17<0.001
AB1.83±0.220.91±0.2021.3830.92±0.18<0.001
Gingival bleeding indexA0.69±0.060.16±0.0143.4830.52±0.50<0.001
O0.69±0.050.17±0.0151.5340.53±0.50<.;001
B0.70±0.040.16±0.0168.0250.53±0.52<.001
AB0.69±0.030.17±0.0176.0870.52±0.51<0.001

Paired t-test


[Table/Fig-6] Illustrates that there was no statistically significant difference between the study groups in terms of responding to the nonsurgical periodontal treatment (p>0.05).

One-Way ANOVA test to study the responses to scaling and root planing between blood groups.

Clinical parametersSum of squaresMean squareF valuep-value
Probing depthBetween groups0.9220.3072.4490.073
Within groups7.0320.126
Total7.954
Relative attachment levelBetween groups0.4290.1431.8160.155
Within groups4.4070.079
Total4.836
Plaque indexBetween groups0.0200.0070.3520.788
Within groups1.0380.019
Total1.058
Gingival indexBetween groups0.1440.0481.7310.171
Within groups1.5500.028
Total1.694
Gingival bleeding indexBetween groups0.0010.0000.2680.848
Within groups0.0750.001
Total0.077

[Table/Fig-7] shows that there was no statistically significant difference between the study groups in terms of responding to the nonsurgical periodontal treatment (p>0.05).

Tukey test for multi comparison between groups to study the level of response to scaling and root planing.

Clinical parametersBlood groupBlood groupMean differenceStd. errorp-value
Probing depthAO-0.112670.129390.820
B-0.262670.129390.189
AB-0.314000.129390.084
OA0.112670.129390.820
B-0.150000.129390.655
AB-0.201330.129390.412
BA0.262670.129390.189
O0.150000.129390.655
AB-0.051330.129390.979
ABA0.314000.129390.084
O0.201330.129390.412
B0.051330.129390.979
Relative attachment levelAO0.017330.102430.998
B-0.112670.102430.691
AB-0.189330.102430.262
OA-0.017330.102430.998
B-0.130000.102430.586
AB-0.206670.102430.194
BA0.112670.102430.691
O0.130000.102430.586
AB-0.076670.102430.877
ABA0.189330.102430.262
O0.206670.102430.194
B0.076670.102430.877
Plaque indexAO0.050000.049720.747
B0.026000.049720.953
AB0.034000.049720.903
OA-0.050000.049720.747
B-0.024000.049720.963
AB-0.016000.049720.988
BA-0.026000.049720.953
O0.024000.049720.963
AB0.008000.049720.998
ABA-0.034000.049720.903
O0.016000.049720.988
B-0.008000.049720.998
Gingival indexAO0.080000.060760.556
B-0.046670.060760.868
AB0.054000.060760.811
OA-0.080000.060760.556
B-0.126670.060760.171
AB-0.026000.060760.973
BA0.046670.060760.868
O0.126670.060760.171
AB0.100670.060760.356
ABA-0.054000.060760.811
O0.026000.060760.973
B-0.100670.060760.356
Gingival bleeding indexAO-0.002000.013400.999
B-0.010000.013400.878
AB0.000670.013401.000
OA0.002000.013400.999
B-0.008000.013400.933
AB0.002670.013400.997
BA0.010000.013400.878
O0.008000.013400.933
AB0.010670.013400.856
ABA-0.000670.013401.000
O-0.002670.013400.997
B-0.010670.013400.856

Discussion

Despite bacteria being the main cause of the periodontal diseases, various factors such as geographical location, race, age, smoking, diabetes and genetics play a role in the development of periodontal diseases, including gingivitis and periodontitis [3]. It is established that ABO blood phenotypes and rhesus factor frequencies vary among the human population according to location and race [6]. Similarly, the distribution of periodontal diseases varies according to these two factors as well. These facts may suggest an association between ABO blood groups with the incidence of periodontal diseases.

The present cross-sectional study showed that blood group A is the most prevalent followed by blood groups O, B and AB. These findings were in accordance with Demir T et al., and Koregol AC et al., while Agarwal V et al., who reported that blood group A was the most common followed by B, O and AB [12,14,24]. Those findings were in contrast with Francis TL et al., who reported that blood group O was the most predominant [16].

This study showed that the incidence of gingivitis was significantly higher in individuals with blood group A, and periodontitis was higher in individuals with blood group O. The results of our study match with the already conducted studies [12-14]. Likewise, Patel R et al., found that subjects with blood group B and O showed a significantly higher tendency towards periodontitis [15]. However, our findings were in conflict with Francis DL et al., who reported that there was no statistically significant difference between ABO blood groups with periodontal diseases [16]. This could be attributed to the fact that subjects in that study were divided into two groups only, with no periodontitis and with periodontitis, and our study had a larger sample size. Additionally, our observations contradict with those of Pai GP et al., [25]. They reported that a significantly higher percentage of participants with blood group O and AB were healthy compared to those with blood group B and A who had periodontal disease. This could be due to the patients’ classification system applied in each study. To illustrate, in present study, healthy participants and those with gingivitis were separated into two different groups, while in the Pai et al. study, participants with healthy periodontium and mild gingivitis were kept in the same sample group.

Regarding the association between Rh factor and periodontal status, data acquired from this research revealed a significant association between Rh positive and periodontitis followed by gingivitis. These observations were reflected in the findings of Demir T et al., and Anup P et al., both reported a significant relationship between Rh positive and gingivitis [12,13]. Furthermore, our results were compatible with Patel R et al., who demonstrated a significant relationship between Rh positive and periodontitis [15].

The findings of this research could be explained in the light of notion that antigens (A and B) of the ABO blood groups, which can be found in body fluids such as saliva, affect the periodontal status by acting as receptors for infectious agents that are concomitant with periodontal diseases. Another explanation is that these substances A, B and H, which is the precursor of antigen A and B, can also be found in tissues and correspond to the erythrocyte However, the expression of these antigens in tissues varies from individual to individual based on the secretor status. As a result, These substances may be modulators that contribute to the development of oral diseases in the stratified epithelium [26]. Moreover, the ABO antigens that are secreted to the saliva might prevent bacteria from being attached to the surface of the tooth. This could be attributed to the fact that bacteria use the lectins on their surfaces to attach to the surface of the tooth, and these lectins are often ABO antigens specific [27].

On a different note, the present study showed that there was no significant association between the level of response in patients with generalised chronic periodontitis to scaling and root planing based on their blood group. In our opinion, this could be because of the treatment that we provided to the patients included only scaling and root planing without applying any medication, such as topical antibiotics, which might have different results as the applied materials may interact with the ABO antigens that exist in saliva. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first research in literature that discusses whether individuals respond differently to the nonsurgical periodontal therapy based on their blood group.

Limitation

In the cross-sectional study, the participants were recruited on the basis of Convenience Sampling (first arrived first included into a suitable group was followed), which resulted in the number of cases outnumbering the controls. Additionally, only Rh-positive patients were included in the second stage of the study, and Rh-negative patients might respond in a different way to scaling and root planing compared to Rh positive ones.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that subjects with blood group A had a higher incidence of developing gingivitis and subjects with blood group O had a higher incidence of developing periodontitis. Moreover, according to present data, the Rh factor seems to play a significant role in the incidence of both periodontitis and gingivitis. A and O blood groups and Rh factor are possible risk factors for periodontal disease. The level of response to scaling and root planing does not differ among patients based on their blood groups. These findings expand our understanding of periodontal diseases as ABO blood groups and Rh factor might constitute a risk factor and explain why a periodontal disease might be more prevalent in some individuals than the others.

Future recommendation: In future, more studies are required to determine whether the level of response to scaling and root planing would differ based on blood phenotypes and when topical antibiotics are applied.

Each similar subscript letter denotes a subset of periodontal status categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjustment). Chi-square test.Each similar subscript letter denotes a subset of periodontal status categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at 0.05 level (Bonferroni adjustment). Chi-square test.Paired t-test

References

[1]Albandar JM, Tinoco EM, Global epidemiology of periodontal diseases in children and young persons Periodontol 2000 2002 29:153-76.10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.290108.x  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[2]Kinane DF, Causation and pathogenesis of periodontal disease Periodontol 2000 2001 25(1):8-20.10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.22250102.x  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[3]Nunn ME, Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: an overview of periodontal risk factors Periodontology 2000 2003 32(1):11-23.10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03202.x12756030  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA, Clinical periodontology Classification of diseases and conditions affecting the periodontium 2002 10:103-04.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Daniels G, Bromilow I, Essential guide to blood groups 2011 John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781444325188  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]Dean L, Blood group antigens are surface markers on the red blood cell membrane Blood groups and red cell antigens: National Center for Biotechnology Information 2005 :11-16.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Watkins W, The ABO blood group system: historical background Transfusion Medicine 2001 11(4):243-65.10.1046/j.1365-3148.2001.00321.x  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Whincup P, Cook D, Phillips A, Shaper A, ABO blood group and ischaemic heart disease in British men BMJ 1990 300(6741):1679-82.10.1136/bmj.300.6741.16792390546  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Roberts JF, Blood groups and susceptibility to disease British Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine 1957 11(3):10710.1136/jech.11.3.10713471902  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Mortazavi H, Hajian S, Fadavi E, Sabour S, Baharvand M, Bakhtiari S, ABO blood groups in oral cancer: a first case-control study in a defined group of Iranian patients Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014 15(3):1415-18.10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.141524606475  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Meo S, Rouq F, Suraya F, Zaidi S, Association of ABO and Rh blood groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016 20(2):237-42.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Demir T, Tezel A, Orbak R, Eltas A, Kara C, Kavrut F, The effect of ABO blood types on periodontal status Eur J Dent 2007 1(3):139-43.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Anup P, Siddhartha V, Girish S, Keshava A, Sameer Z, Vishwajeet K, ABO and Rh Blood group system and periodontal disease-a prevalence study Br J Med Med Res India Brazil 2016 16(523):1-6.10.9734/BJMMR/2016/24055  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Koregol AC, Raghavendra M, Nainegali S, Kalburgi N, Varma S, ABO blood groups and Rhesus factor: An exploring link to periodontal diseases Indian J Den Res 2010 21(3):364-68.10.4103/0970-9290.7080420930346  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Patel R, Patel KM, Patel HN, Shah HG, ABO Blood Group & Periodontitis: Correlation or No-Relation Ann Int Med Den Res 2006 2:251-54.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Francis DL, Raja BK, Krishnan L, Chandran CR, Association of ABO blood group and Rh factor with periodontitis among patients attending Tagore Dental College and Hospital: a cross-sectional study European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical sciences 2018 5(1):639-43.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Cihan YB, Significance of ABO-Rh blood groups in response and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014 15(9):4055-60.10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.9.405524935596  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Li Q, Wu T, Ma XA, Jing L, Han LL, Guo H, Prognostic role of aBO blood group in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2018 14:99110.2147/TCRM.S16008929881281  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Unal D, Eroglu C, Kurtul N, Oguz A, Tasdemir A, Kaplan B, ABO blood groups are not associated with treatment response and prognosis in patients with local advanced non-small cell lung cancer Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013 14(6):3945-48.10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.6.394523886212  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Löe H, Silness J, Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity Acta Odontol Scand 1963 21(6):533-51.10.3109/0001635630901124014121956  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Silness J, Löe H, Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1964 22(1):121-35.10.3109/0001635640899396814158464  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Ainamo J, Bay I, Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque Int Den J 1975 25(4):229-35.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Armitage GC, Svanberc GK, Löe H, Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachment levels Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1977 4(3):173-90.10.1111/j.1600-051X.1977.tb02271.x268333  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Agarwal V, Sunny Kaul M, Agarwal S, An exploring link to periodontitis: abo blood group International Journal of Current Research 2017 9(4):48812-16.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Pai GP, Dayakar MM, Shaila M, Dayakar A, Correlation between “ABO” blood group phenotypes and periodontal disease: Prevalence in south Kanara district, Karnataka state, India Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 2012 16(4):51910.4103/0972-124X.10689223493096  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Campi C, Escovich L, Valdés V, García Borrás S, Racca L, Racca A, Secretor status and ABH antigens expression in patients with oral lesions Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007 12(6):431-34.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Blackwell C, The role of ABO blood groups and secretor status in host defences FEMS Microbiology Immunology 1989 1(6-7):341-49.10.1016/0378-1097(89)90256-5  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]