JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Anaesthesia Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/41354.12902
Year : 2019 | Month : Jun | Volume : 13 | Issue : 06 Full Version Page : UC05 - UC09

Effect of Intracuff Inflation with Alkalinised Lignocaine, Saline and Air on Early Postoperative Airway Morbidity-A Randomised Control Trial

Suvajit Podder1, Gayathri Bhat2

1 Postgraduate, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, K.S. Hegde Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
2 Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, K.S. Hegde Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Suvajit Podder, Department of Anaesthesia, Main OT, K.S. Hegde Hospital, Mangaluru-575018, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: suvajitpodder@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard of airway management, and usage of the cuffed Endotracheal Tube (ETT) is routine clinical practice. The ETT provides adequate ventilation and reduces aspiration risk. N2O, when used along with oxygen for maintenance, diffuses inside the cuff and increases the cuff pressure leading to laryngotracheal morbidity postoperatively. When alkalinised lignocaine and saline are instilled in the cuff, it prevents the increase of cuff pressure. Alkalinised lignocaine is more permeable and has additional anaesthetic property. We formulated this study to find out whether alkalinised lignocaine, saline or air is better for intubated patients.

Aim

To assess and compare the incidence and severity of post extubation airway morbidity when alkalinised lignocaine, saline and air is used for cuff inflation.

Materials and Methods

Ninety patients were randomly allocated, between 18-70 years of age who were posted for surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation into three groups of 30 each. The cuff of the ETT was inflated with air in Group A, saline in Group B, alkalinised lignocaine in Group C. The three groups were compared regarding sore throat, hoarseness of voice and cough at intervals of two, four and six hours along with haemodynamic stability and smoothness of extubation. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous data and Chi-Square test for categorical data. Post-Hoc Bonferroni or Mann-Whitney test were used for intergroup comparison.

Results

The demographic data along with the duration of surgery and the volume of injectate in the cuff was comparable between the three groups. The incidence of sore throat, hoarseness of voice and cough was significantly less in Group C compared to Group A and B. The haemodynamic variations during extubation were also significantly less in Group C compared to the other two groups.

Conclusion

Alkalinised lignocaine instilled into the cuff of intubated patients undergoing general anaesthesia decreases the extubation response and the immediate postoperative airway morbidity.

Keywords

Introduction

Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard of airway management and usage of the cuffed ETT is a common clinical practice. The ETT provides effective ventilation for patients under general anaesthesia and reduces the risk of aspiration by providing a tight seal with the tracheal mucosa.

The cuff of the ETT is routinely inflated with air. Oxygen and N2O mixture along with inhalational agent, commonly used for maintenance of general anaesthesia. N2O provides an edge when used in general anaesthesia, due to its properties such as faster onset and recovery, low solubility in blood and adipose tissue [1,2]. At the same time, due to its poor solubility in blood, it diffuses inside the cuff and increases the cuff pressure [3]. Therefore, when N2O is used for maintenance of anaesthesia, the cuff pressure can increase intraoperatively which can lead to significant complications during extubation and postoperative period.

Cuff Tracheal Pressure more than 30 cm of H2O can cause mucosal damage as the tracheal capillary perfusion is compromised, and this can lead to early and delayed airway complications [4,5]. Increased intracuff pressure contributes to laryngotracheal morbidity in the early postoperative period with symptoms such as sore throat, cough, dysphonia, dysphagia and dryness of throat [6].

Almost 40% of the patients after extubation, complains of sore throat and hoarseness of voice in the postoperative period, more so in patients with co-morbidities and smoking [3,7]. The incidence of cough has been noted ranging from 38-96% [8]. Cough during emergency can alter haemodynamics, can lead to haemodynamic instability which can be detrimental in patients with compromised cardiovascular reserve [9].

To prevent all these complications, the cuff of an ETT which is a hydrophobic semi-permeable membrane can be used as a reservoir for drug delivery to the tracheal mucosa [8,10,11]. Various alternatives like saline, plain lignocaine and dexamethasone, have been evaluated for cuff inflation to reduce the laryngotracheal morbidity and decrease the haemodynamic response to extubation [6,12]. To produce this desired effect, the volume of plain lignocaine required will be high, which can increase the cuff pressure [12-14], but alkalinising lignocaine (pH maintained more than 7) will cause faster diffusion, and required volume will be less [14,15]. Use of an alternative method of cuff inflation could be a simple and effective way in decreasing the complications of endotracheal intubation both in the perioperative period as well as in ICU setting. This study was done to compare the effects of ETT cuff inflation with air, saline or alkalinised lignocaine on postoperative airway morbidity.

Materials and Methods

The prospective randomised control study was conducted at Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical care, Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India, from March 2018 to September 2018. Institutional Ethics Committee clearance was obtained (INST.EC/EC/079/2017-18).

Adult patients aged between 18-70 years belonging to ASA PS I & II posted for elective surgical procedures, under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation lasting more than two hours. Randomisation was done by closed envelope method. According to the Estebe JB et al., the difference of proportion of hoarseness of voice between two groups in that study was 70% [8].

Sample size was calculated using the formula for the difference of proportions as follows:

α: alpha error: 5%

Zα: Z score for the alpha error chosen=1.96 at 5% level of significance

Zβ: Z score: 1.281 at 90% power

p1 (proportion of hoarseness of voice in group 1): 80%

p2 (proportion of hoarseness of voice in group 2): 10%

p=p1+p2

After substituting the concerned values to the above formula we arrived at a sample size (n) ≥15 per group. However, 30 patients were enrolled in each group to increase the power of the study and exclude patients due to protocol violation [Table/Fig-1].

Consort flow chart.

Inclusion Criteria

All adult patients aged between 18-70 years.

Patients belonging ASA PS I & II posted for elective surgical procedures of duration more than two hours under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

Refused informed consent by the patient.

Patients undergoing emergency surgeries.

Procedures requiring perioperative nasogastric tube placement.

Patients with a high risk of aspiration.

Anticipated difficult airway.

Pregnant women.

Active upper respiratory tract infections.

Preoperative sore throat.

Previous history of GERD.

Head and neck surgeries and surgeries requiring prone position.

Procedure

All patients underwent a thorough pre-anaesthetic evaluation with a detailed history, complete physical examination and routine investigations and those satisfying the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study after obtaining an informed and written consent.

Ninety patients were randomly allocated into one of the three groups in which the endotracheal tube cuff was inflated with:

Group A: Air

Group B: Saline

Group C: Alkalinised lignocaine

Alkalinisation of lignocaine was achieved by adding 2.5 mL of 7.5% sodium bicarbonate to 2.5 mL of 2% lignocaine with 5 mL of saline (10 mL). The saline or the alkalinised lignocaine were prepared by OT technician who documented the same in a separate register. The alkalinisation of lignocaine was checked with the use of universal indicator paper. All solution in Group C was ensured to have a pH of above 7. All patients were kept nil per oral and premedicated as per standard guidelines.

On the day of surgery after shifting the patient to OT and intravenous access was secured. Standard monitors such as electrocardiogram (ECG), pulseoximeter, and Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) were attached, and baseline vitals were noted. All patients were preoxygenated for 3 minutes and induced with IV Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and IV Propofol (2 mg/kg) or to the loss of verbal command. After confirmation of adequate bag and mask ventilation Inj. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was given for muscle relaxation. The patients were ventilated using Bain’s circuit and face mask with a mixture of 100% Oxygen and inhaled anaesthetics (isoflurane/sevoflurane). An anaesthesiologist with at least two years of experience did direct laryngoscopy and intubation with Macintosh blade (#3 or #4) following adequate relaxation as judged by a peripheral nerve stimulator.

Endotracheal intubation was done using the appropriate size polyvinylchloride endotracheal tube as per gender and lubricated with saline, and the cuff was inflated with allocated agents as per randomisation. The cuff is inflated till the air leak has just stopped which is assessed by auscultation or presence of any leak in the ventilator expired volume. The cuff pressure was measured only in Group A with air soon after endotracheal cuff inflation and at an interval of 1 hour, 2 hour and before deflation of the cuff.

Patients with unanticipated difficult intubation requiring >2 attempts were excluded from the study. Anaesthesia was maintained with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and inhaled anaesthetics with positive pressure ventilation, along with top up of muscle relaxant to maintain ETCO2 between 30-35 mmHg. At the end of the procedure, inhaled anaesthetics were discontinued and patients were extubated after giving appropriate dosage of neuromuscular reversal agent as per institutional protocol. Patients were shifted to Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) after the completion of the procedure.

An independent observer, who was blinded to the group allocation made the following observations:

Haemodynamic responses to extubation: Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure was measured just after giving reversal, and immediately after extubation (T0) and subsequently at 5 minute (T5), 10 minute (T10), 15 minute (T15), 30 minute (T30) and at 60 minute (T60).

The smoothness of extubation: Absence of coughing or bucking, and variation of less than 30% from the baseline regarding heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure was considered as smooth extubation. We recorded number of times each patient bucked or coughed after reversal agent was given till extubation. Bucking during oral suctioning was excluded.

The presence of sore throat, hoarseness of voice and cough was documented and graded at intervals of two, four and six hours in PACU after shifting the patient.

A 4 point graded scale was used for sore throat, hoarseness of voice and cough [16]:

1) Sore throat

Grade 0: No sore throat

Grade 1: Mild discomfort or itchy sensation

Grade 2: Pain on swallowing

Grade 3: Pain at rest

2) Hoarseness of voice

Grade 0: No Hoarseness

Grade 1: Hoarseness at the time of interview but noted only by the patient

Grade 2: Hoarseness that is readily apparent but mild

Grade 3: Hoarseness that is readily apparent and severe

3) Cough

Grade 0: No cough

Grade 1: Minimal cough

Grade 2: Moderate cough

Grade 3: Severe cough

Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 20 for Windows was used for analysing data. Continuous data were analysed using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed data and Kruskal- Wallis test for skewed data. Intergroup comparisons were made by using Post-Hoc Bonferroni test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney U test for skewed data. Normally distributed data were represented as mean±standard deviation and skewed data was represented as median with an interquartile range between 25th to 75th percentile. Categorical data like proportions were analysed using the Chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The demographic variables, duration of surgery and the volume of agent instilled in the ETT cuff were comparable among the groups as stated in [Table/Fig-2].

Comparison of demographic details, duration of surgery and amount of allocated agent instilled in cuff.

Group AGroup BGroup Cp-value
Age in years (mean±SD)41.10±13.6138.67±13.4338.20±13.470.659*
Sex (F/M)16/1415/1516/140.956#
Weight in Kg (mean±SD)60.47±8.9463.43±8.6062.53±7.900.386*
Duration of surgery in minutes (mean±SD)222.07±51.073235.33±50.68219±34.260.375
Amount of allocated agent in ml (mean±SD)5.70±0.725.85±0.645.58±0.540.278

*One way Anova; #Chi-square


The cuff pressure was significantly high when baseline values were compared with 1 hour, 2 hour and deflation with a p-value of <0.001. Comparison of cuff pressure from 1st hour till deflation was comparable [Table/Fig-3].

Comparison of cuff pressures at regular intervals.

Cuff pressureMean differenceStandard errorp-value*
Starting v/s 1h-11.732.318<0.001
Starting v/s 2h-8.301.40<0.001
Starting v/s Deflation-5.901.03<0.001
1h v/s 2h3.431.920.510
1h v/s Deflation5.832.1490.066
2h v/s Deflation2.401.080.210

*Post-Hoc Bonferroni


Bucking was assessed after giving of reversal agent: Group C showed a lower incidence of bucking compared to Group A and B which was clinically significant (p<0.001) [Table/Fig-4].

Incidence of bucking.

Haemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were measured at baseline before induction, at reversal and after extubation at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 minutes after giving reversal. Group C had lower incidence of increase in heart rate compared to Group A and Group B which was statistically significant. From 30 minutes all 3 groups are comparable showing no difference [Table/Fig-5].

Trend of heart rate.

Group C had lower incidence of increase in mean arterial pressure compared to Group A and Group B which was statistically significant. From 10 minutes all 3 groups are comparable showing no difference . Group A and Group B was comparable at all intervals [Table/Fig-6].

Trend of mean arterial pressure.

There was a highly significant difference in percentage change in heart rate and blood pressure during extubation among the three groups with a p-value of <0.001 [Table/Fig-7].

Haemodynamic changes during extubation.

Smoothness of extubation: Group C had maximum smooth extubation compared to other two groups (p<0.001) [Table/Fig-8].

Incidence of smooth extubation.

Sore throat: Sore throat grade was lowest in group C at the end of 2 hours and 4 hours. 26 out of 30 had a grade of 0 at the end of 2 hours and 28 out of 30 had a grade of 0 at the end of 4 hours with a p-value of <0.001. At 6 hours all three groups were comparable with a p value of 0.194 [Table/Fig-9].

Incidence of sore throat.

Hoarseness of voice: Hoarseness of voice at 2 hours and 4 hours was lowest in group C. 27 out of 30 patients in group C had a hoarseness grade of 0 at 2 hours and 28 out of 30 had a grade of 0 at 4 hours with a p-value of <0.001. At 6 hours hoarseness of voice was comparable [Table/Fig-10].

Incidence of hoarseness of voice.

Cough: Cough was lowest in group C at the end of 2 hours and 4 hours. 28 out of 30 had a grade 0 after 2 hours and 29 out of 30 had a grade of 0 at the end of 4 hours with a p-value of <0.001. At 6 hours all three groups were comparable with a p-value of 0.387 [Table/Fig-11].

Incidence of cough.

Discussion

Most of the surgical cases under general anaesthesia are managed with endotracheal intubation with Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV). Post-intubation, the endotracheal cuff is generally inflated with air which prevents aspiration of gastric contents. Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness of voice and cough are the side effects of intubation. These problems contribute to patient discomfort and laryngotracheal morbidity and delays discharge. The haemodynamic response seen during extubation can lead to significant morbidity and can be catastrophic in cardiopulmonary compromised patients. Smooth extubation with a comfortable post-operative recovery is the desired goal.

In our study, we compared the effect of three agents for inflation of the cuff on the immediate postoperative laryngotracheal symptoms as well as haemodynamic parameters at extubation. All three groups were comparable with regards to age, sex, height and weight as well as the duration of surgery. Minimum period of two hours was taken for the surgery which allowed sufficient time for the drug to diffuse out of the cuff. The incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat (POST) was compared among the three groups. It was noted to have 7 to 8 times lesser incidence of POST in alkalinised 0.45% lignocaine group (13.3%) when compared to saline (86.7%) and air (90%) groups. Alkalinised lignocaine group has a minimal incidence of sorethroat with a p-value of <0.001 at the end of two and four hours when compared to saline and air. These findings are similar to the study of Soares SM et al., were the incidence of sore throat was 11 times higher in air (22%) group and 5 times higher in saline (10%) group when compared to alkalinised lignocaine (2%) group, and the decrease was maximum with 1% lignocaine [17]. Similarly, Jaichandran W et al., found that the POST incidence after 1 hour of extubation decreased by 5 times when 2% alkalinised lignocaine was used instead of air for cuff inflation [18].

In our study, the incidence of Postoperative Hoarseness of Voice (POHV) was 6 to 7 times lesser in alkalinised 0.45% lignocaine group (10%) when compared to air (73.3%) and saline (60%) and it was mostly seen after two and four hours. Similarly, Estebe JB et al., also noted 19 times lesser incidence of POHV in alkalinised lignocaine (4%) when compared to air (76%) and 8 times when compared to plain lignocaine (32%) [19]. Jolly S et al., also showed that hoarseness of voice at post-extubation (24hrs) was minimal in alkalinised lignocaine group (6%) when compared to saline (19%) and plain lignocaine (11%) with a p-value of 0.04 [9]. We found that the incidence of Postoperative Cough (POC) was less in alkalinised 0.45% lignocaine group (6.7%) compared to air (83.3%) and saline (66.7%) group. Alkalinised lignocaine group had 11-12 times lesser incidence of cough postoperatively with a p-value of <0.001 at the end of two and four hours when compared to saline and air. Fagan C et al., also compared the incidence of cough post-extubation, when ETT cuff was inflated with lignocaine, air and saline [12]. They found that the minimum incidence of cough was seen in the lignocaine group which was 16% when compared to air and saline which was 38% and 44% respectively.

In our study, we measured the cuff pressure in air group and noticed that there was an increase of cuff pressure from baseline when compared at intervals of one hour, two hours and before deflation with a p-value of <0.001. We used N2O for maintenance of anaesthesia. Baseline haemodynamic parameters were noted before induction and were comparable among all three groups with a p-value of 0.448. Haemodynamic response during and post-extubation was compared in all the three groups. Alkalinised lignocaine group showed a better result compared to the other groups, which was transient and lasted for 15 minutes for heart rate and 5 minutes for blood pressure. The incidence of bucking was lowest in group C. The smoothness of extubation was better in alkalinised lignocaine, showed 93.3% incidence of smooth extubation when compared to air and saline which had only 30% and 20% respectively (p<0.001).

It is well known that the irritant receptors present in tracheal mucosa are very sensitive to physical or chemical stimulation. ETT cuff is made of polyvinylchloride, which forms a semi-permeable membrane through which lipophilic substance can diffuse across. Therefore, the lignocaine thus reaching the tracheal mucosa has perhaps anaesthetised the mucous membrane obtunding the extubation response and decreasing the immediate postoperative morbidity.

Limitation

The drawbacks of the study were gauged as the incompatibility of the cuff manometer, which lead to measuring of the cuff pressure of ETT only for Group A (air), and not done for Group B (saline) and Group C (alkalinised lignocaine), the vocal cord mobility of the patient was not checked during extubation and blood serum levels of lignocaine was not checked intraoperatively.

Strength of the study: Sample size was adequate for the study, it was properly randomised and proper blinding was followed. The results are unambiguously in favour of alkalinised lignocaine with statistical proof of the same. The outcomes are similar to previous reports reinforcing the hypothesis.

Conclusion

Use of intracuff alkalinised lignocaine is very effective in reducing the laryngotracheal morbidity like sore throat, hoarseness of voice and cough in the immediate postoperative period when compared to saline and air. It also helps in smoother extubation by decreasing haemodynamic response and bucking over the tube. It is a safe and effective method of improving extubation and recovery from endotracheal intubation for patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia.

*One way Anova; #Chi-square*Post-Hoc Bonferroni

References

[1]Nakamura Y, Fujiwara S, Tsukamoto M, Sakamoto E, Yokoyama T, Diffusion of nitrous oxide through endotracheal tube cuffs Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013 30:260-260.10.1097/00003643-201306001-00814  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[2]Fujiwara S, Noguchi A, Nakamura Y, Tsukamoto M, Hitosugi T, Yokoyama T, Diffusion of nitrous oxide through endotracheal tube cuffs Biomed Res Int 2016 27(1)  [Google Scholar]

[3]Bennett MH, Isert PR, Cumming RG, Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness following tracheal intubation using air or saline to inflate the cuff-A randomized controlled trial Anaesth Intensive Care 2000 28(4):408-13.10.1177/0310057X000280040910969368  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Nordin U, The trachea and cuff-induced tracheal injury. An experimental study on causative factors and prevention Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1977 345:1-71.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Dobrin P, Canfield T, Cuffed endotracheal tubes: Mucosal pressures and tracheal wall blood flow Am J Surg 1977 133(5):562-68.10.1016/0002-9610(77)90008-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]Combes X, Schauvliege F, Peyrouset O, Motamed C, Kirov K, Dhonneur G, Intracuff pressure and tracheal morbidity influence of filling cuff with saline during nitrous oxide anesthesia Anesthesiology 2001 95(5):1120-24.10.1097/00000542-200111000-0001511684980  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Navarro LH, Lima RM, Aguiar AS, Braz JR, Carness JM, Módolo NS, The effect of intracuff alkalinized 2% lidocaine on emergence coughing, sore throat, and hoarseness in smokers Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (English Edition) 2012 58(2):248-53.10.1016/S2255-4823(12)70188-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Estebe JP, Delahaye S, Le Corre P, Dollo G, Le Naoures A, Chevanne F, Alkalinization of intra-cuff lidocaine and use of gel lubrication protect against tracheal tube-induced emergence phenomena Br J Anaesth 2004 92(3):361-66.10.1093/bja/aeh07814970135  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Jolly S, Ubale P, A Comparative study to study the difference in effect between intracuff saline, lidocaine and alkalinized 2% lidocaine on emergence cough, sore throat and hoarseness Int J Contemp Med Res 2018 5(3):C1-C6.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Sconzo JM, Moscicki JC, Difazio CA, In vitro diffusion of lidocaine across endotracheal tube cuffs Regional Anesthesia 1990 15(1):37-40.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Dollo G, Estebe JP, Le Corre P, Chevanne F, Ecoffey C, Le Verge R, Endotracheal tube cuffs filled with lidocaine as a drug delivery system: in vitro and in vivo investigations Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci Pract 2001 13(3):319-23.10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00119-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[12]Fagan C, Frizelle HP, Laffey J, Hannon V, Carey M, The effects of intracuff lidocaine on endotracheal-tube-induced emergence phenomena after general anesthesia Anesth Analg 2000 91(1):201-05.10.1097/00000539-200007000-0003810866913  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Huang CJ, Tsai MC, Chen CT, Cheng CR, Wu KH, Wei TT, In vitro diffusion of lidocaine across endotracheal tube cuffs Can J Anaesth 1999 46(1):82-86.10.1007/BF0301252010078409  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Jaichandran VV, Angayarkanni N, Karunakaran C, Bhanulakshmi IM, Jagadeesh V, Diffusion of Lidocaine buffered to an optimal pH across the Endotracheal tube cuff- An in-Vitro study Indian J Anaesth 2008 52(5):536  [Google Scholar]

[15]Souissi H, Fréchette Y, Murza A, Masse M-H, Marsault É, Sarret P, Intracuff 160 mg alkalinized lidocaine reduces cough upon emergence from N2O-free general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial Can J Anaesth 2016 63(7):862-70.10.1007/s12630-016-0652-827075030  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Sumathi PA, Shenoy T, Ambareesha M, Krishna HM, Controlled comparison between betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly applied over tracheal tube to reduce postoperative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice Br J Anaesth 2007 100(2):215-18.10.1093/bja/aem34118024955  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Soares SM, Arantes VM, Módolo MP, Dos Santos VJ, Vane LA, Navarro e, The effects of tracheal tube cuffs filled with air, saline or alkalinised lidocaine on haemodynamic changes and laryngotracheal morbidity in children: A randomised, controlled trial Anaesthesia 2017 72(4):496-503.10.1111/anae.1376427987218  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Jaichandran VV, Bhanulakshmi I, Jagadeesh V, Thennarasu M, Intra cuff buffered lidocaine versus saline or air-A comparative study for smooth extubation in patients with hyperactive airways undergoing eye surgery Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2009 15(2):11-14.10.1080/22201173.2009.10872600  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[19]Estebe JP, Dollo G, Le Corre P, Le Naoures A, Chevanne F, Le Verge R, Alkalinization of intracuff lidocaine improves endotracheal tube induced emergence phenomena Anesthesia & Analgesia 2002 94(1):227-30.10.1097/00000539-200201000-0004411772834  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]