Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2019/39517.12616
Year : 2019 | Month : Feb | Volume : 13 | Issue : 02 Page : SC09 - SC12

Prevalence of Intussusception after Rotavirus Vaccination: A Hospital Based Study from Odisha, India

Manas Kumar Nayak1, Manoj Kumar2, Rajesh Kumar Nayak3, Mirabai Das4, Nirmal Kumar Mohakud5

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, KIIT, Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
2 Postgraduate, Department of Pediatrics, KIMS, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
3 Research Associate, Department of KSPH, KSPH, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
4 Medical Officer, Dispensary, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
5 Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, KIMS, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Nirmal Kumar Mohakud, Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, KIMS, KIIT, Patia, Bhubaneswar-751024, Odisha, India.
E-mail: nkmohakud@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Introduction

Intussusception is a common cause of bowel obstruction in children and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Most recent evidence shows a slight increase in risk of intussusception after rotavirus vaccination. Following introduction of Rotavac®, an indigenous oral rotavirus vaccine, there is a need of continuous surveillance for intussusception.

Aim

To examine epidemiology of intussusception in children aged <5 years admitted in hospital and the risk of onset of the disease during vaccination.

Materials and Methods

A hospital based surveillance was conducted during period of September 2016-June 2018 to assess intussusception. In the case-control study, a total of 13 hospital admitted cases aged <5 years with intussusception according to Brighton level 1 criteria and 8 controls were included. Plasma VP6 level for presence of Rotavirus and hemi nested PCR for measuring VP7 and VP4 gene levels in cases and controls were performed. Age, sex and locality matched controls were considered for comparison.

Results

The frequency of intussuception was 0.67% and 0.93% for children <5 years and <2 years of age, respectively. The median age of onset was 11.33+7.12 months in patients <2 years of age. Rotavirus was not detected in stool samples of cases, however, only one control (12.5%) was positive for the pathogen. Fifteen (88%) children with intussusception were managed conservatively and 2 cases (12%) required surgery, without mortality.

Conclusion

Prevalence of intussuception among hospitalised children, aged <5 years, was 0.67%. In this study, we had observed the absence of rotavirus association among the cases of intussusception, either due to rotavirus vaccination or natural rotavirus infection. The study provides baseline information for epidemiology of childhood intussusception in children of Odisha during post rotavirus vaccination programme implemented by Government of India.

Introduction

Intussusception is a serious medical condition in which a part of the alimentary tract invaginates into an adjacent segment and leads to intestinal obstruction commonly occurring in children younger than 2 years [1,2]. Moreover, intussusception was observed in 60% of children with <1 year of age and in 80% of the cases aged <2 years of age. Gender wise, the occurrence was found to be 3:1 for males and females respectively [3]. According to WHO report, in developed countries, the baseline incidence of intussusception is between 0.5-4.3 cases per 1,000 live births or 0.7-1.2 cases per 1,000 children aged <1 year [4]. The occurrence of intussusception in Indian infants appears to be lower than middle and high-income countries [5].

Rotavirus is an important pathogen causing diarrhea and is responsible for 150,000 deaths annually among Indian children <5 years of age [5]. This pathogen contributes significantly to incidence of intussusception as observed by several authors [6,7]. However, natural rotavirus infection is not a major contributor of intussusception in Indian infants [5]. Study on epidemiology of intussusception in Indian children is a prior requirement of rotavirus vaccination programme for decision making about use of new rotavirus vaccines. Accurate estimates of the incidence of intussusception are not available for most developing countries.

Therefore, a case-control study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital to examine the association of intussusception with natural rotavirus infection or vaccination in children aged less than five-year-old.

Materials and Methods

A case-control study was conducted at the Paediatrics ward of a tertiary care hospital with paediatric surgical facilities in Odisha during September 2016 to June 2018. Out of 2533 admitted children of <5 years of age, 17 cases with intussusception were taken, as per Brighton level 1 criteria and their stool samples were collected. Out of 17 cases, stool samples from four cases got contaminated and could not be used in further assays. Stool samples from eight controls (non-intussusception cases) were also collected for comparative analysis. The information regarding rotavirus vaccination was collected. Samples collected from cases and controls were transported safely to the referral laboratory once every month. Following inclusion criteria was considered in the current investigation.

Inclusion Criteria

Children were included as cases of intussusception if they meet the following inclusion criteria [8].

#Cases with <5 years of age who meet the case definition for intussusception using the Level 1 Brighton criteria [9].

#Surgical criteria:

Demonstration of invagination of the intestine at surgery;

#Radiological criteria:

Demonstration of invagination of the intestine by either air or liquid contrast enema;

Demonstration of an intra-abdominal mass by abdominal ultrasound with specific

characteristic features (target sign or doughnut sign on transverse section and a pseudo kidney or sandwich sign on longitudinal section), that is proven to be reduced by hydrostatic enema on post-reduction ultrasound.

#Autopsy criteria:

Demonstration of invagination of the intestine at autopsy.

Controls: Subjects selected from non-intussusception, non-infectious hospitalised patients were considered as controls in this study. Each control matched with a case in age, sex and location. Controls were taken within 30 days of the enrolment of intussusception cases. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/primary caregiver.

Laboratory Procedures

Stool samples were stored at -70°C till further use. A screening for presence of rotavirus VP6 was performed by enzyme immunoassay or EIA (PremierTM Rotaclone, Meridian Bioscience Inc., Cincinnati, OH) [10]. The cDNA was used as template for genotyping in a hemi-nested multiplex PCR for detection of VP7 (G type) and VP4 (P type) genes, using published oligonucleotide primers [5,11]. For samples which were negative by genotyping PCR, a VP6 conventional PCR was performed to rule out rotavirus positivity [12].

Results

Prevalence of intussusception is presented in [Table/Fig-1], which shows that, during the study period, 17 infants and children with definite intussusceptions were identified, from a total of 2533 enrolled subjects aged <5 years (0.67%); whereas, 15 cases of the disease were recognised from a total of 1598 children aged <2 years of age (0.93%).

Prevalence of intussusceptions in hospital admitted children under 5 and 2 years of age.

Total number of children admittedNumbers of intussusception casesPrevalence
<5 years-n=2533170.67%
<2 years-n=1598150.93%

n=Numbers


A line graph is shown to examine the seasonal trend in intussusception cases from Sept. 2016-Aug 2018 in KIMS, Odisha [Table/Fig-2]. It was observed that, intussusception cases occurred round the year with no distinct seasonality.

Seasonal trend of intussusceptions.

The majority (53%) of intussusception cases occurred in the second year of life [Table/Fig-3]. Further, the male: female ratio was found as 2.4:1. The prevalence of intussusception was higher in patients of rural areas (76%) as compared to urban areas (24%). Although fever, bloody stool and pain abdomen was the presentation in most of the cases (59%, 47%, 47% respectively), vomiting was found in 35% of cases. Constipation was present in 1 (6%) case. Lead point was identified in 7 (41%) cases. Intussusception was reduced by medical management in 15 (88%) of cases and 2 (12%) cases needed surgical intervention. Out of total 21 stool samples no rotavirus was detected in cases but one control sample (12.5%) was found positive [Table/Fig-3].

Socio-demographic profile and clinical features of 17 intussusceptions cases.

VariablesTotal number(%)
Gender
Male1270.5
Female529.5
Age
<12 months847
>12 months953
Location
Rural1376
Urban424
Fever10/1759
Vomiting6/1735
Constipation1/176
Bloody stools8/1747
Abdominal pain8/1747
Rotavirus detected in stool sample.
*Cases, n=1300
Control, n=8112.5
Management
Surgical2/1712
Medical15/1788

*Stool samples from 13 cases were used out of total 17 for rotavirus detection. Eight controls (non-intussusception cases) were taken for comparative analysis.


As shown in [Table/Fig-4], the average age of onset of the disease was 15.47±13.14 months for cases aged <5 years; whereas, for subgroup with age <2 years, it was found to be 11.33+7.12 months. Next, the duration of hospital stay was 6.35±3.57 days and 4.37±0.91 days for cases and controls respectively. However, no intussusception associated death was recorded.

Age of onset and duration of hospital stay of intussusceptions cases.

CharacteristicsControl (n=8) (Mean±SD)Case (Mean±SD)p-value
Age of onset <5 years (in months) (n=17)17.38±13.8215.47±13.140.75
Age of onset <2 years (in months) (n=15)17.38±13.8211.33+7.120.176
Hospital stay (in days)4.37±.916.35±3.57*0.14

For cases (n=17)


As shown in [Table/Fig-5], on categorical characterisation of cases and controls, it was found that, fever and vomiting occurs in both groups showing no significant difference. However, bloody stool and pain abdomen were consistently found in cases, and not in controls (p<0.019). Importantly, rotavirus was detected in only one control stool sample.

Comparison of categorical characteristics between case and control.

CharacterControl (n%)Case (n%)p-value
Gender
Female5 (50)5 (50)0.194
Male3 (20)12 (80)
Locality
Rural4 (24)13 (76)
Urban4 (50)4 (50)0.359
Fever7 (42)10 (58)0.205
Vomiting4 (40)6 (60)0.667
Constipation0 (00)1 (100)1.000
Bloody stools0 (00)8 (100)0.019
Abdominal pain0 (00)8 (100)0.019
Rotavirus detected1 (100)0 (00)0.137

Discussion

WHO recommends surveillance of intussusception in countries where rotavirus vaccine programme is carried out. Although, prior studies have indicated no alterations in risk of intussusception during Rotavac® administration [13], we performed the current investigation to examine a baseline informations in our locality. The purpose of the present study was to monitor intussuception after rotavirus vaccine introduction in national immunization schedule.

We analysed intussusception data obtained in 2 years of study in Odisha. Being a referral hospital, the records for denominators of population and birth were not available to estimate the population based incidence of intussusceptions. However, the hospital based incidence of 6.7 out of 1000 admitted cases was observed in our study and the frequency was found to be higher as compared to other studies [14-16]. The incidence of intussusception in European children varied from 0.66 to 2.24 per 1000 admitted subjects and 0.75 to 1.00 per 1000 children in emergency departments. Although, the peak incidence of this disease was found in children between 3 to 9 months of age [17], the age range was found to be 11.33+7.12 months as shown by us. Similar to our findings, the median age was 12.1 months as observed in a study conducted at Uzbekistan [18].

In this study, the classic triad; including bloody stool, abdominal pain and fever were found in about 50% of cases; similar to reports made by other studies [19,20]. Fever was the most common clinical symptom and its absence makes the diagnosis of intussusception unlikely. The median length of hospital stay for patients in this study was 6.35+3.57 days, which is similar to other studies conducted in Uzbekistan [18] and Tanzania [21].

Although, available evidences to date do not indicate the risk of intussusception after vaccination, a vigilance surveillance is recommended to rule out such risk. The ability to access the risk of a rare adverse event will depend on the background rates of the event in the people who underwent vaccination. Present study, the first of its kind, aims to document the hospital based incidence and epidemiology of childhood intussusception in post vaccination programme Government of India. In this study, we observed the intussusception cases were not associated with rotavirus vaccination or natural rotavirus infection. This result is in accordance with earlier studies that indicated no increase in intussusception rate from baseline after rotavirus vaccination [22,23].

In majority of cases, the intensity of the disease was reduced due to early presentation to hospital and medical management, including immediate intervention by paediatric surgeon with help of radiologist [4,24]. In our case, only two cases needed surgical intervention. Additionally, no case fatality was observed which is consistent with another study [25].

Limitation

The major limitation of the study is that, being a tertiary care hospital, intussusception rate could not be calculated. Although intussusception is more prevalent in children aged <2 years, we considered the cases aged under 5 years, to see the epidemiological trend. Other infectious gut pathogens responsible for intussusception were not evaluated. Lastly, the numbers of cases and controls were also less to generalise.

Conclusion

In this preliminary investigation, neither rotavirus infection nor rotavirus vaccination in children <5 years of age attributed to intussusceptions. Overall, the study provides an information on a baseline epidemiology of childhood intussusception in children of Odisha. However, to examine the safety concerns about rotavirus immunization program, multicentric studies are crucial to perform and our future studies are directed to achieve this target.

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not represents the view of CMC Vellore.

Funding: This study was funded by CMC Vellore.

Ethics approval and consent to participate: All infants’ parents provided written informed consent, and this study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT University and the Institutional Review Board of CMC, Vellore.

n=Numbers*Stool samples from 13 cases were used out of total 17 for rotavirus detection. Eight controls (non-intussusception cases) were taken for comparative analysis.For cases (n=17)

References

[1]Bines JE, Kohl KS, Forster J, Zanardi LR, Davis RL, Hansen J, Acute intussusception in infants and children as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation Vaccine 2004 22(5-6):569-74.10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.09.01614741146  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Jiang J, Jiang B, Parashar U, Nguyen T, Bines J, Patel MM, Childhood intussusception: a literature review PLoS One 2013 8(7):1-14.10.1371/journal.pone.006848223894308  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Nelson. nelson textbook of paediatrics [Internet]. first sout. 2015. Available from: https://www.google.com/search?q=1.+Nelson+Textbook+of+Paediatrics%2CFirst+South+Asian+Edition&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab  [Google Scholar]

[4]Takeuchi M, Osamura T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Hashimoto H, Matsuda S, Intussusception among Japanese children: An epidemiologic study using an administrative database BMC Paediatr [Internet]. BioMed Central Ltd 2012 12(1):36Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/3610.1186/1471-2431-12-3622439793  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Bahl R, Saxena M, Bhandari N, Taneja S, Mathur M, Parashar UD, Population-based incidence of intussusception and a case-control study to examine the association of intussusception with natural rotavirus infection among Indian children J Infect Dis [Internet] 2009 200(s1):S277-81.Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/60504510.1086/60504519817609  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Murphy TV, Gargiullo PV, Massoudi MS, David B, Nelson BS, Jumaan AO, Intussusception among infants given an oral rotavirus vaccine N Engl J Med 2001 344(8):564-72.10.1056/NEJM20010222344080411207352  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Delage G, De L, Rotavirus vaccine withdrawal in the United States : The role of postmarketing surveillance 2000 11(1):14-16.10.1155/2000/41439618159257  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Reddy S, Nair NP, Giri S, Mohan VR, Tate JE, Parashar UD, Safety monitoring of ROTAVAC vaccine and etiological investigation of intussusception in India: study protocol BMC Public Health 2018 18(1):898Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5809-710.1186/s12889-018-5809-730029630  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Bines JE, Nguyen TL, Justice F, Tran NS, Carlin JB, De Campo M, Validation of clinical case definition of acute intussusception in infants in Viet Nam and Australia Bull World Health Organ 2006 84(7):569-75.10.2471/BLT.05.02544516878231  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Gautam R, Lyde F, Esona MD, Quaye O, Bowena MD, Comparison of PremierTM Rotaclone®, ProSpecTTM, and RIDASCREEN® rotavirus enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of rotavirus antigen in stool specimens J Clin Virol 2013 58(1):292-94.10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.02223850415  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Kang G, Desai R, Arora R, Chitamabar S, Naik TN, Krishnan T, Diversity of circulating rotavirus strains in children hospitalized with diarrhea in India, 2005-2009 Vaccine [Internet]. Elsevier 2013 Jun 12 [cited 2018 Jul 28] 31(27):2879-83.Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X1300469610.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.03023624096  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Banerjee I, Ramani S, Primrose B, Iturriza-Gomara M, Gray JJ, Brown DW, Modification of rotavirus multiplex RT-PCR for the detection of G12 strains based on characterization of emerging G12 rotavirus strains from South India J Med Virol. Wiley Online Library 2007 79(9):1413-21.10.1002/jmv.2087217607780  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Bhandari N, Rongsen-chandola T, Bavdekar A, Kang G, Rathore SS, Juvekar S, Efficacy of a Monovalent Human-Bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial Lancet 2015 383(9935):2136-43.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62630-6  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]WHO Geneva.Acute intussusception in infants and children. Incidence, clinical presentation and management: a global perspective. 2002. Pp. 1-98  [Google Scholar]

[15]Liu N, Yen C, Huang T, Cui P, Tate JE, Jiang B, Incidence and epidemiology of intussusception among children under 2 years of age in Chenzhou and Kaifeng, China, 2009-2013 Vaccine 2018 36(51):7862-67.[Internet]. Elsevier; 2018 Feb 10 [cited 2018 Jul 28]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X1830206810.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.03229439864  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]John J, Kawade A, Rongsen-Chandola T, Bavdekar A, Bhandari N, Taneja S, Active surveillance for intussusception in a phase III efficacy trial of an oral monovalent rotavirus vaccine in India Vaccine 2014 32(Suppl 1):A104-09.10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.0365091662  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Huppertz H-I, Soriano-Gabarro M, Grimprel E, Elisabetta F, Mezner Z, Desselberger U, Intussusception Among young children in Europe The Paediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2006 25:S22-29.10.1097/01.inf.0000197713.32880.4616397426  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Latipov R, Khudoyorov R, Flem E, Childhood intussusception in Uzbekistan: Analysis of retrospective surveillance data BMC Paediatr 2011 11:2-7.10.1186/1471-2431-11-2221435218  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Rayamajhi A, Thapa A, Kumar M, Yen C, Tate JE, Parashar UD, Preparing for rotavirus vaccine introduction - A retrospective assessment of the epidemiology of intussusception in children below 2 years of age in Nepal Vaccine 2018 36(51):7836-40.[Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X1731581510.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.02229169894  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Lehnert T, Sorge I, Till H, Rolle U, Intussusception in children-clinical presentation, diagnosis and management Int J Colorectal Dis 2009 24(10):1187-92.10.1007/s00384-009-0730-219418060  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Chalya PL, Kayange NM, Chandika AB, Childhood intussusceptions at a tertiary care hospital in northwestern Tanzania: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in rei-limited setting Ital J Paediatr 2014 40(1):2810.1186/1824-7288-40-2824618338  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Patel MM, Haber P, Baggs J, Zuber P, Bines JE, Parashar UD, Intussusception and rotavirus vaccination: A review of the available evidence Expert Review of Vaccines 2009 8(11):1555-64.10.1586/erv.09.10619863248  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Rha B, Tate JE, Weintraub E, Haber P, Yen C, Patel M, Intussusception following rotavirus vaccination: an updated review of the available evidence Expert Rev Vaccines 2014 13(11):1339-48.10.1586/14760584.2014.94222325066368  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU N Engl J Med 2006 355:2725-32.10.1056/NEJMoa06111517192537  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Bhowmick K, Kang G, Bose A, Chacko J, Boudville I, Datta SK, Retrospective surveillance for intussusception in children aged less than five years in a south indian tertiary-care hospital J Heal Popul Nutr 2009 27(5):660-65.10.3329/jhpn.v27i5.377719902802  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]