JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Paediatrics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/37721.12331
Year : 2018 | Month : Dec | Volume : 12 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : SC09 - SC12

Comparative Study between Analgesic Effect of Breast Feeding and Oral Sucrose in Full Term Newborns

Milind Gajbhiye1, Sunil Kumar Rao2, H P Singh3

1 Resident, Department of Pediatrics, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Medical Science, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Professor, Department of Paediatrics, S.S. Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Sunil Kumar Rao, Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Medical Science, BHU, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drsunilrao21@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Non-pharmacological measures like oral sucrose and breast feeding are recommended modalities to treat acute procedural pain in newborns. Birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine exposes newborns to pain of intramuscular injection which is preventable. The present study has been carried out to assess the severity of pain and the effect of breast feeding and oral sucrose.

Aim

To study the pain profile and the effects of breast feeding and oral sucrose solution on pain, in full term newborns.

Materials and Methods

A prospective interventional case control study was carried out in the Department of Paediatrics and Post natal ward of Obstetrics and Gynaecology associated Gandhi Memorial Hospital. Randomly selected 150 full term vaginally delivered healthy newborns were enrolled in the study. Recruited newborn infants were grouped into three arms and each arm had 50 newborns. Group I as control group, and group II and III as intervention groups. A 1 mL of 25% oral sucrose solution was given two minutes before the vaccination in group II. Breast feeding was started 2 minutes before vaccination and continued till the end of injection in group III. The primary outcome of the study was to assess pain by Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score. PIPP score was compared by using ANOVA test and student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables and two tailed Fisher-exact test or Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The critical levels of significance of the results were considered at 0.05 levels i.e., p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Mean PIPP scores were lower in group III (8.36) than in group II (11.06) and difference was significant (p<0.0001). The pain profile of newborns ranged from 9 to 18 with mean of 14.26 in group I, from 5 to 12 with mean of 11.06 in group II and from 1 to 12 with mean of 8.36 in group III respectively.

Conclusion

Intramuscular injection produces moderate to severe pain response in group I and mild to moderate pain responses in group II and III. Breast feeding provides superior analgesia to oral sucrose and reduces moderate to severe painful response to mild to moderate grade in term newborns.

Keywords

Introduction

The anatomical, physiological and neurochemical structures that convey pain are well developed at 24 weeks of gestation and thereafter foetus experiences pain [1]. Assessment of pain and its management is an integral part of care in neonatal intensive care unit. Non-pharmacological measures like pacifier, oral sucrose and glucose, swaddling, skin to skin contact with mother, massage and acupuncture therapy are recommended modalities to treat acute, transient or mild pain and as adjunctive therapy for moderate to severe pain [2]. Intramuscular injection produces acute transient pain in newborns. Breast feeding [3-7], Expressed Breast Milk (EBM) [8], oral sucrose [9,10] and glucose [10,11] has analgesic effect on acute procedural pain. Most of these studies examined effect on pain caused by heel sticks, venipuncture, eye examination and circumcision. Limited studies have examined the effect of oral sucrose, skin to skin contact and kangaroo mother care on newborns pain during intramuscular injections [12-16]. Only one study has examined the effect of breast feeding on newborns pain during intramuscular injection [17]. Pain scale used by investigator had limited reported clinical utility [18]. American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) recommends nine commonly used pain assessment scales for acute procedural pain [19]. PIPP scale has established adequate psychometric properties (validity, reliability) and clinical utility for use in the infants [20]. The present study has been carried out to assess severity of pain and effect of breast feeding and oral sucrose in healthy full term newborns on birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine.

Materials and Methods

This prospective interventional case control study was carried out in the Department of Paediatrics and Post natal ward of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, associated Gandhi Memorial Hospital over a period of one year from July 2010 to June 2011. The inclusion criteria were vaginally delivered, breastfeed, full term newborns with mean age of 40 hours and weight ranged from 2.59 to 2.732 kg. Exclusion criteria were sick newborn, formula fed, and those newborn whose mother received general anaesthesia and opiods during delivery. Informed and written consent was taken from parent/guardian and ethical committee approval was obtained before starting the study.

For sample size calculation we did a pilot study on 20 newborns and was found that mean PIPP score was 11 after giving 1 mL of 25% oral sucrose. So on assuming that there is 15% decline in mean PIPP score in breast feeding group, with power of study 90% and with alpha error of 0.05, a sample size of 51 newborns was required.

Intervention

Recruited newborns were divided into control (group I) and intervention groups (group II and group III). Newborns were vaccinated on mother’s lap without any intervention in group I. A 1 mL of 25% oral sucrose was given two minutes prior to vaccination in group II. Breast feeding was started two minutes prior to vaccination and continued till the end of injection in group III.

Newborns were attached with BPL ACCURA MPM5553 multipara monitor using a neonatal probe. One lady attendant/Staff nurse along with mother was present when breast feed newborns were vaccinated. With all aseptic precautions, 0.5 mL hepatitis B vaccine was administered intramuscularly on anterolateral aspect of mid thigh to all neonates by auto disposable syringe. Position of baby (mother lap), the vaccinator, brand of vaccine and syringe used was the same throughout the study. Two observers were present during vaccination session, one for recording of facial expression of baby, and second observer was recording heart rate and oxygen saturation. Sucrose was administered in the absence of the observers and within two minutes, the intervention was done.

Gestational age was calculated by new Ballard score and behavioural state of newborns was assessed 15 seconds prior to vaccination, along with baseline recording of Heart Rate (HR) and SpO2. The maximum HR and minimum oxygen saturation were noted between 0-30 seconds. Cry time was defined as the total duration of audible cry, and calculated by using the video time bar at 30 seconds, 60 seconds and 90 seconds and 120 seconds after vaccinations. The facial expression component of PIPP score was analysed by recording, the first 30 seconds of clipping by third observer. The primary outcome of the study was the PIPP score. It is a validated pain measure that includes contextual (behavioural state and gestational age), behavioural (brow bulging, eye squeezing and nasolabial furrowing) and physiological (heart rate and oxygen saturation) indicators of pain. Each indicator is scored in a 4 point scale (0-3) and total scores vary from 18 to 21 depending on the infant’s gestational age. In mild to moderate grade pain total score would be 6 to 12 and scores more than 12 indicates moderate to severe pain in newborns [21,22].

All data were entered into excel sheet and analysed by using SPSS version 16. PIPP score were compared by using ANOVA test, student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables and two tailed Fisher-exact test or Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The critical levels of significance of the results were considered at 0.05 levels i.e., p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Out of 150 newborns, 74 were males and 76 were females. The neonatal characteristics like, mean birth weight, length, head circumference, mean age of vaccination and baseline heart rate and oxygen saturation were comparable between the groups [Table/Fig-1]. Mean PIPP scores were lower in group III (8.36) than in group II (11.06) and difference was significant (p<0.0001) The pain profile of newborns ranged from 9 to 18 with mean of 14.26 in group I, from 5 to 12 with mean of 11.06 in group II and from 1 to 12 with mean of 8.36 in group III respectively [Table/Fig-2]. Total duration of cry was lower in group III (23.8 sec) than group II (26.36 sec) and difference was not significant (p>0.05). The mean of heart rates were 13.47, 16.58 and 27.35 respectively in group III, group II and group I [Table/Fig-1]. The mean difference of increasing heart rate between group I and group II was 10.76, and between group I and group III was 13.88, and between group II and group III was 3.11 respectively. The difference was significant when compared with group I, II and III (p 0.001) and it was not significant between group III and group II (p 0.526) [Table/Fig-3].

Neonatal infant baseline characteristics.

S. NoBaseline characteristicsGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIp-value
1Males22 (44.0%)29 (58.0%)23 (46.0%)0.318$
2Females28 (56.0%)21 (42.0%)27 (54.0%)0.318$
3Birth weight, mean (gram) SD2597 (282)2732 (341)2641 (214)0.056#
4Length, mean (cm) SD47.74 (1.54)48.73 (2.22)48.4 (1.30)0.019#
5Head circumference, mean (cm) SD33 (0.92)33.94 (1.25)34.06 (0.71)<0.001#
6Mean age of vaccination (hrs) SD46 (8.5)42 (8.8)44 (7.9)0.06#
7Heart rate, mean, SD126.88 (12.47)128.76 (12.28)136.76 (13.89)<0.001#
8Oxygen saturation, mean (%), SD96.30 (1.54)96.86 (1.49)95.66 (2.20)0.004#
9Heart rate1, mean, SD27.35 (9.28)16.58 (7.89)13.47 (7.32)<0.001*
10Oxygen saturation2, mean, SD4.19 (2.11)2.07 (3.23)2.33 (2.91)<0.001*

1. Mean increase in heart rate from baseline to 30 sec. after vaccination

2. Mean decrease in oxygen saturation from baseline to 30 sec. after vaccination

$Chi-square test was use to calculate the p-value

#One-way ANOVA parametric was use to calculate the p-value

*Wilcoxon signed rank test was use to calculate the p-value


Comparative analysis of outcome variables in this present study.

VariableGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIp-value
PIPP scale, mean (range)14.26 (9 to 18)11.06 (5 to 12)8.36 (1 to 12)PIPP scoret ½ (0.0001)t 1/3 (0.0001)t 2/3 (0.0001)
Total duration of cry, mean (second).61.38 (15-135)26.36 (7-76)23.8 (0-90)Total duration of cryt ½ (0.001)t 1/3 (0.0001)t 2/3 (>0.05)

Comparative analysis of mean difference of heart rate and SpO2.

Physiological ParametersGroupGroupMean DifferenceStd. Errorp-value
HR_DIFFGroup I n=50Group II10.76607*2.28791<0.0001
Group III13.88189*2.28791<0.0001
Group II n=50Group III3.115822.287910.526
SpO2_DIFFGroup I n=50Group II2.11866*0.706780.010
Group III1.86032*0.706780.028
Group II n=50Group III-.258340.706781.000

*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.


The mean of oxygen saturation were 2.33, 2.07 and 4.19 respectively in group III, group II and group I [Table/Fig-1]. Difference in means of oxygen saturation between group I and group II was 2.11, between group I and group III was 1.86 and group II and group III was -0.25 respectively. The difference was significant when compared with group I (p 0.01) and it was not significant between group III and group II (p=1) [Table/Fig-3]. Minimum level of desaturation was observed in group II.

Discussion

The observations of this study were, intramuscular injection produced moderate to severe pain response, breast feeding has superior analgesic effect than oral sucrose and physiological parameters (HR, SpO2) and duration of cry were significantly lower in group II, and group III than group I, change in physiological parameters were not significant in group II and group III.

Analgesic effect of skin to skin contact, non nutritive sucking, kangaroo mother care, 24% oral sucrose, and 25-30% oral glucose were done in past by different researchers on pain induced by intramuscular injection in first 48 hours of life. The results are compiled in [Table/Fig-4]. Most of the studies mentioned in the table investigated the analgesic effect of skin to skin contact, and oral sucrose or glucose and found that skin to skin contact was superior to 25% glucose in reducing NFCS and NIPS (p=0.045) and NIPS score was lower in 30% glucose than water (p=0.001). A study by Moddares M et al., found that DAN score was lower in breastfeeding than control (p<0.001) [17]. None of the studies described the pain profile and comparison between analgesic effect of breast feeding and oral sucrose. In the present study, it was found that pain intensity was mild to moderate in group II and III that means breast feeding or oral sucrose alone is not able to bring down the pain score below non treatable levels. There was equal effect shown by breast feeding and sucrose on increase in heart rate and decrease in oxygen saturation similar results were found by other researchers mentioned in [Table/Fig-4] [12-17,23,24]. Author had assumed that 15% lower score in group III than group II during pilot study in 20 newborns for sample size calculation, but this difference was 25%.

Comparative analysis of different studies with present study [12-17,23,24].

Author (reference), NComparison GroupOutcome measures and Main results
Kostandy R et al., [24]; n=72, Term infantSkin to skin contact (SSC)No interventionSSC neonates cried less compared to control (23 vs 32 seconds) and trend towards more rapid heart rate rise.
Liaw JJ et al., [12]; n=165, gestational age >36 weekNon nutritive sucking (NNS),20% oral sucroseRoutine carePain was significantly lower among infants in the NNS (p<0.001) and sucrose (p<0.001) groups than that in controls. Infants in the NNS and sucrose groups also had significantly lower mean heart and respiratory rates than the controls. Cryduration of infants receiving sucrose was significantly shorter than those in theNNS (p<0.001) and control groups (p<0.001).
Present study, n=150, term infantsBreastfeeding25% oral sucroseNo interventionMean Premature infant pain profile (PIPP) scores were lower in group III (8.36) than in group II (11.06) and difference was significant (p<0.0001). Total duration of cry was lower in group III (23.8 sec) than group II (26.36 sec) and difference was not significant (p>0.05). Breast feeding provides superior analgesia to oral sucrose and reduces moderate to severe painful response to mild to moderate grade in term newborns.
Chermont AG et al., [13]; n=640 term infantsSkin to skin contact and 25% glucoseNo interventionLower NFCS, NIPS and PIPP scores for skin-to-skin contact and 25% glucose group compared with each intervention alone and no intervention group (p<0.001 for each comparison).Skin to skin contact superior to 25% glucose group in reducing NFCS and NIPS (p=0.045).
Taddio A et al., [14]; n=240 gestational age >36 week24% sucrosePlaceboPIPP score did not differ significantly between the sucrose and placebo groups for newborns of diabetic or non diabetic mothers.
Kashaninia Z et al., [15]; n=100, term infantsKangaroo mother care (KMC)No interventionThe cumulative NIPS score immediately after injection in the intervention group was significantly lower (p<0.001) than in the control group.
Golestan M et al., [23]; n=90 term infants50% glucoseWaterNo interventionNo significant differences in HR between glucose and the other groups.Reduced crying time for glucose group compared with no intervention (p=0.0001) but not compared with water (p=0.191).
Moddares M et al., [17]; n=130 term infantsBreast feedingNo interventionThe mean of pain severity (DAN score) in case group was 3.5 and in control group was 6.7 and it shows significant difference according to Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.0001).
Sajedi F et al., [16]; n=64 term infants30% glucoseWaterLower NIPS scores for glucose group compared with water (p=0.001).No significant differences in HR between groups.

Limitation

The limitation of present study was lack of blinding because in breastfeeding group it is not possible to blind. Four or more investigators were blinded for pharmacological intervention; intervention was given by first investigator alone and then other investigators entered the immunization room, one administered vaccine after calling aloud in when the needle was inserted and when the needle was removed. Other investigator recorded all events on a digital camera from the removal of the needle, and fourth investigator analysed the outcome variable from the recording. Following this protocol three investigators were blinded to the pharmacological intervention. We could not study the role of the different component of breast feeding or the mechanism behind the analgesic effect of sucrose. The strength of study was use of PIPP score to assess pain because scale is validated and proven to discriminate painful from non painful stimuli, and we compared the analgesic effect of breast feeding and oral sucrose on pain response induced by intramuscular injection within 48 hours of life.

Conclusion

Intramuscular injection produces moderate to severe pain response in newborns, and breast feeding provides superior analgesia to oral sucrose and reduces moderate to severe painful response to mild to moderate grade in term newborns.

1. Mean increase in heart rate from baseline to 30 sec. after vaccination2. Mean decrease in oxygen saturation from baseline to 30 sec. after vaccination$Chi-square test was use to calculate the p-value#One-way ANOVA parametric was use to calculate the p-value*Wilcoxon signed rank test was use to calculate the p-value*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

References

[1]Turnage CS, LaBrecque MA, Preventing and treating pain and stress among infants in the NICU. In: Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Hansen AR, Stark AR (eds) Manual of Neonatal Care 2012 7th editionNew DelhiLippincott Williams & Wilkins:870-85.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Hatfield LA, Neonatal pain: What’s age got to do with it? Surgical Neurology International 2014 5(Suppl 13):479-89.10.4103/2152-7806.14463025506507  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Shah PS, Aliwalas L, Shah V, Breastfeeding or breast milk to alleviate procedural pain in neonates: a systematic review Breastfeed Med 2007 2:74-82.10.1089/bfm.2006.003117661578  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Carbajal R, Veerapen S, Couderc S, Jugie M, Ville Y, Analgesic effect of breast feeding in term neonates: Randomized controlled trial BMJ 2003 326(7379):1310.1136/bmj.326.7379.1312511452  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Gray L, Watt L, Blass EM, Skin to skin contact is analgesic in healthy newborns Paediatrics 2000 105(1):e1410.1542/peds.105.1.e1410617751  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Gray L, Miller LW, Philipp BL, Blass EM, Breast feeding is analgesic in healthy newborns Paediatrics 2002 109(4):590-93.10.1542/peds.109.4.59011927701  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Upadhayay A, Aggarwal R, Narayan S, Joshi M, Paul VK, Deorari AK, Analgesic effect of expressed breast milk in procedural pain in tern neonates: a randomized, placebo-controlled double blind trial Acta Paediatr 2004 93:518-22.10.1080/0803525041002279215188980  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Stevens B, Yamado J, Ohlsson A, Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedure Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004 (3):CD00106910.1002/14651858.CD001069.pub2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[9]Skogsdal Y, Eriksson M, Shillon J, Analgesia in newborns given oral glucose ActaPaediatr 1997 86:217-20.10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08872.x9055897  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Desmukh LS, Udani RH, Analgesic effect of oral glucose in preterm infants during venipuncture-A double randomized controlled trial J Trop Paediatr 2002 48:138-41.10.1093/tropej/48.3.13812164596  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Sahoo JP, Rao S, Nesargi S, Ranjit T, Ashok C, Bhat S, Expressed breast milk vs 25% dextrose in procedural pain in neonates: A double blind randomized controlled trial Indian Paediatr 2013 50:203-07.10.1007/s13312-013-0067-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[12]Liaw J-J, Zeng W-P, Yang L, Yuh Y-S, Yin T, Yang M-H, Nonnutritive sucking and oral sucrose relieve neonatal pain during intramuscular injection of hepatitis vaccine Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011 42(6):918-30.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.01621620644  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Chermont AG, Falcao LF, de Souza Silva EH, de Cassia Xavier Balda R, Guinsburg R, Skin-to-skin contact and/or oral 25% dextrose for procedural pain relief for term newborn infants Paediatrics 2009 124:1101-07.10.1542/peds.2009-099319948613  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Taddio A, Shah V, Hancock R, Smith RW, Stephens D, Atenafu E, Effectiveness of sucrose analgesia in newborns undergoing painful medical procedures CMAJ 2008 179:37-43.10.1503/cmaj.07173418591525  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Kashaninia Z, Sajedi F, Ragozar M, Noghabi FA, The effect of kangaroo care on behavioural responses to pain of an intramuscular injection in neonates J Spec Paediatr Nurs 2008 13:275-80.10.1111/j.1744-6155.2008.00165.x  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[16]Sajedi F, Kashaninia Z, Rahgozar M, Radrazm L, The efficacy of oral glucose for relieving pain following intramuscular injection in term neonates Acta Med Iran 2006 44:316-22.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Moddares M, Vasegh Rahimparvar F, Mehran A, Jazayeri A, Effect of breast feeding on pain of injection in newborns Hayat 2006 12(4):328  [Google Scholar]

[18]Lawrence J, Akock D, McGrath P, Koy J, MacMurray SB, The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain Neonatal Net 1993 12:59-66.  [Google Scholar]

[19]American Academy of Paediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American Academy of Paediatrics Section on Surgery; Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and Newborn CommitteeBatton DG, Barrington KJ, Wallman C, Prevention and management of pain in the neonate: An update Paediatrics 2006 118:2231-41.[PubMed]  [Google Scholar]

[20]Waldem M, Pain assessment and management-guideline for practice National Association of Neonatal Nurses 2001   [Google Scholar]

[21]Desai SA, Nanavati RN, Jasani BB, Kabra N, Comparison of neonatal pain, agitation, and sedation scale with premature infant pain profile for the assessment of acute prolonged pain in neonates on assisted ventilation: a prospective observational study Indian Journal of Palliative Care 2017 23(3):287-92.10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_42_1728827932  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A, Premature Infant Pain Profile: development and initial validation Clin J Pain 1996 12(1):13-22.10.1097/00002508-199603000-000048722730  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Golestan M, AkhavanKarbasi S, Modares-Mosadegh M, Sadr-Bafghi M, Analgesic effects of glucose and water in neonates Acta Med Iran 2007 45:461-64.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Kostandy R, Anderson GC, Good M, Skin-to-skin contact diminishes pain from Hepatitis B vaccine injection in healthy full-term neonates Neonatal Netw 2013 32:274-80.10.1891/0730-0832.32.4.27423835546  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]