JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Psychiatry/Mental Health Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/32011.12324
Year : 2018 | Month : Dec | Volume : 12 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : VC10 - VC13

Financial Burden, Depression and Coping Strategies among Parents of Children Admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU)

Kushal Shah1, Jagdish R Varma2, Maithily V Patel3, Krutika R Tandon4, Ajay G Phatak5, Somashekhar M Nimbalkar6

1 Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.
3 Medical Student, Department of Psychiatry, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.
4 Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.
5 Statistician, Central Research Services, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.
6 Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Gujarat, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Jagdish R Varma, Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: jagdishrv@charutarhealth.org
Abstract

Introduction

In India, direct out of pocket expenditure on healthcare is about 70%. Taking care of an ill child is one of the most emotionally draining and difficult tasks a parent can face. Pursuing social support, positive reappraisals are most used strategies by parents to cope. There are few studies catering to these aspects among parents whose child is admitted in PICU in Indian population.

Aim

The study aimed to assess financial burden and depression amongst parents of a child admitted in PICU and their variance with social support and household coping strategies.

Materials and Methods

A cross-divtional survey was conducted on parents of 150 parents of patients admitted to PICU at rural tertiary care teaching hospital. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to measure depression. Socio-demographic and clinical profile, financial burden and social support were measured using semi-structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the sociodemographic and clinical profile of the study population and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to assess associations.

Results

Mean age of the fathers was 31.22 years (range 23-50) and of mothers was 30.39 years (range 22-42). Mean family income was 6186.3 rupees per month and median was 5000 rupees. Only 6% families had below poverty line status and majority (96.7%) had no health insurance. Median (IQR) duration of PICU stay was four days (IQR: 2, 6) and of hospital stay was six days (IQR: 3.75, 10). The median (IQR) medical and non-medical cost in INR incurred were 20,000 (IQR: 13725, 50375), 1,200 (IQR: 600, 2525) respectively. Borrowing money from friends/relatives (58%) was most frequently used household coping strategy. Using PHQ-9, 11(7.5%) parents screened positive for mild depression.

Conclusion

Unplanned admission, lack of insurance cover and significant direct medical cost as inferred from the high income to cost ratio, indirect cost incurred by staying away from work push parents into financial and psychological distress.

Keywords

Introduction

Paediatric critical care has grown tremendously in last two decades in India [1]. The admission of a child to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can be stressful for the child and his parents [2] and puts extra financial burden on the family [3].

Direct and indirect expenses incurred from critical care lead to further deterioration of already poor classes [4]. Pursuing social support and positive reappraisal are most commonly used strategies by parents [5,6]. Parents have to change their lifestyle to give time to the child who is under treatment and also at the same time stay away from work, take care of other children at home. These situations can levy extra financial burden and loss of productive hours [7]. Apart from financial burden, seeing a child admitted in PICU can be emotionally disturbing for parents.

Health system of India is becoming highly privatised. In government set-ups, outpatient visits declined from 25% to 20% and hospitalisations declined from 60% to 40% over the decade preceding 2004-05 [8]. Data from the 21st National Sample Survey Office (2015) shows that in government setups in Gujarat, outpatient visits declined from 21% to 19.5%, hospitalisation in rural areas declined from 31.3% to 23.4% and urban areas from 26.1% to 23.3% [9].

In developed countries, most of the families are under the cover of the medical insurance and major medical expenses are taken care of by insurance companies [10]. In a developing country like India, there are large economic differences between various socio-economic classes [11]. Very few people can afford insurance cover [12]. According to World Bank statistics (2014), about 21.3% people in India, live on less than 113.5 rupees per day [13]. They manage hospital costs by various means like savings, selling land and assets; borrow from land lords, etc., [14].

The study aimed to assess financial burden and depression amongst parents of a child admitted in PICU and their variance with social support and household coping strategies.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst parents of patients (age: 1 month to 18 years) admitted to PICU over 16 consecutive months (June 2014 to September 2015) at rural tertiary care teaching hospital located in Anand, Gujarat. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee prior to conduct of the study. Parents who gave written informed consent were included in the study.

Sample Size: As it is an estimation problem, a larger sample size was required to provide stable estimates of various quantities. In absence of national or regional data, we assumed 50% prevalence of depression as this assumption provides maximum sample size that in turn will ensure stability of estimates. Assuming 50% prevalence of depression, we required a sample of at least 97 at 95% confidence level and 10% acceptable error. The sample size was increased to 150 to capture all coping strategies adequately after considering feasibility. A convenient sample of 150 parents was interviewed over the period of the 16 months. Parents who had a child admitted in the PICU were approached and briefed about the purpose and procedures of the study. They were interviewed by one of the authors, in the waiting area of the PICU, one to two days before discharge. Parents who experienced death of a child during hospitalisation were excluded from the study.

Instruments: Structured questionnaires were used to collect the following:

1) Socio-demographic details of the parent and the child;

2) PHQ-9 is a validated questionnaire to screen for depression. Cut-off scores used were 0-4 for no or minimal depression, 5-9 for mild depression, 10-27 for moderate to severe depression. In comparison to a mental health provider structured interview, scores of 5-9 on PHQ-9 represent respondents with either no depression or sub-threshold depression (minor depression and dysthymia). PHQ-9 score ≥10 has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression [15];

3) Financial burden and household coping strategies: To measure these constructs we collected data on: a) approximate medical cost incurred prior to hospitalisation (Private doctor fees, traditional healer, medicines, investigations); b) approximate non-medical cost incurred prior to hospitalisation (Travel, “special food”, other); c) actual medical cost incurred post hospitalisation (including consultation fees, medicine, investigations, excluding any insurance benefits availed); d) approximate non-medical cost incurred post hospitalisation. We also collected from parents estimated cost of treatment provided to parents at the time of admission, lost productivity in terms of number of days family members having to stay away from work and household coping strategies employed to meet the economic burden;

4) Family social support: Parents were interviewed to find sources of personal and emotional support for the family.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics {mean (SD), frequency (%), Median (IQR) etc.,}. were used to depict the characteristics of the study population. Chi-Square test/Analysis of Variance were employed to check associations depending upon the type of variables involved. Analysis was done by using STATA (14.2).

Results

Demographics: A total of 150 parents of 150 children admitted to PICU were included in the study. Most informants were Hindu, fathers, residing in rural areas, living in joint family. All informants were married. Mean age of the fathers was 31.22 years (range 23 to 50) and mean age of mothers was 30.39 years (range 22 to 42). Very few had any medical insurance and very few had BPL ration card. Mean monthly family income was 6186.3 rupees and median was 5000 rupees.

Majority of the children admitted to PICU were males, admitted during day time and most admissions were unplanned. The median duration of PICU stay was four days (IQR: 2, 6) and median duration of hospital stay was six days (IQR: 3.75, 10). Almost all the admitted children needed oxygen, fluids and ventilator support [Table/Fig-1].

Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical profile of study population.

ParticularsFrequency (%)
Patient profile
Gender (Male)89 (59.3%)
Birth Order
185 (56.7%)
250 (33.3%)
≥315 (10%)
Time of admission
Day83 (55.3%)
Evening24 (16%)
Night43 (28.7%)
Unplanned Admission146 (97.3%)
Diagnostic category
Respiratory48 (32.0%)
Neurological34 (22.67%)
RTA/Head injury17 (11.33%)
Other51 (34.0%)
Needed Oxygen148 (98.7%)
Needed Fluids149 (99.3%)
Needed ventilator support146 (97.3%)
Median (IQR). PICU stay in days4 (2,6)
Median (IQR). Hospital stay in days6 (3.75,10)
Caregiver’s Profile
Informant (Father)106 (70.7%)
Residence (Rural)87 (58.0%)
Family type (Joint)87 (58.0%)
Medical Insurance available5 (3.3%)
Below Poverty Line Ration card9 (6%)
Religion
Hindu121 (80.7%)
Muslim29 (19.3%)
Mode of Transport
Ambulance64 (42.7%)
Rickshaw/Car86 (57.33%)

Financial Burden: Median (IQR) direct out-of-pocket cost for the study population was INR 26,050 (12000, 50000). Median monthly income to cost ratio was 5.55. The median (IQR) medical and non-medical cost for the study population was INR 20,000 (13725, 50375) and INR 1,200 (600, 2525) respectively. Median cost for travel was INR 650 and median cost for food was INR 500. Indirect cost was measured using number of day’s family member(s) had to stay away from work. For most of the children admitted, their fathers had to stay away from work (n=149, median duration 6 days) and for 12 children, grandfathers stayed away from work (median duration 5 days). Only a few cases had other relatives staying away from work and hence not reported. The Median (IQR) difference between estimated cost on admission and actual medical cost incurred INR 0 (IQR: 0, 5000).

As shown in [Table/Fig-2], medical cost was not significantly different according to type, time of admission, need for ventilation and diagnosis. There was positive correlation between PICU stay duration and medical cost (r=0.49) and also positive correlation between hospital stay duration and medical cost (r=0.51).

Variance in financial burden according to child’s admission characteristics (N=143*).

VariableCharacteristicNumberMedical cost (INR)Mean (SD)p-value
Time of admission(n=143)Day8031700 (33490)0.356
Evening2340956 (32672)
Night4030150 (20512)
Type of admission(n=143)Planned413500 (08582)0.198
Unplanned13933309 (30534)
Diagnostic category (n=143)Respiratory4432568 (27017)0.716
Neurological3136387 (33148)
RTA/Head injury1737058 (30021)
Other5029460 (32009)

*7 records were excluded from this analysis as these were considered extreme outliers with medical cost >200000 rupees


Household Coping Strategies: As shown in [Table/Fig-3], Borrowing money from relatives and friends (58%), using savings (28.7) and selling assets (28%) were the most frequently used household coping strategy. Minority had to borrow from moneylenders. The mean number of household strategies used per family was 1.34.

Household coping strategies (n=150).

Household coping strategiesn (%)Mean amount generated (INR)Family typeNumber(Percentage)Type of ration cardNumber(Percentage)Access to other health care benefitsNumber(Percentage)
JointNuclearDon’t haveBPLKrupa*None
Used savings43 (28.7)1152326 (60.4)17 (39.6)9 (20.9)04 (9.3)39 (90.7)
Sold assets42 (28)236122 (52.3)20 (47.7)3 (7.1)2 (4.7)042 (100)
Borrowed from money lender21 (14)39468 (38)13 (62)3 (14.2)01 (4.7)20 (95.3)
Borrowed from relatives/friends87 (58)909053 (60.9)34 (39.1)8 (9.2)4 (4.6)3 (3.4)84 (96.6)
Borrowed from others3 (2)44002 (66.7)1 (33.3)01 (33.3)03 (100)
Reduced household consumptions4 (2.7)1032 (50)2 (50)1 (25)01 (25)3 (75)

* Krupa is a low-cost health insurance scheme offered by the local hospital


Depression and Sources of Personal, Emotional Support: The mean (SD) PHQ-9 score was 1.07(0.26). Eleven parents (Nine fathers and two mothers) had mild depression on PHQ-9, none of the parents had moderate to severe depression. Skewed distribution of father:mother may be a limitation with respect to analysis of psychological burden.

As can be derived from [Table/Fig-4,5], Spouse, friends and neighbours and siblings were the most instrumental in providing personal support like doing household chores, getting things from home, help with transportation etc., while child was hospitalised. Spouse, friends and neighbours, siblings, grandparents and doctor were instrumental in providing emotional support. None of the families got such supports from any organisation/agency or religious support group.

Sources of Personal support for Parents of Children Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Sources of Emotional support for Parents of Children Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Discussion

There was slightly higher representation of rural population (58%) and joint families. Monthly income of parents was low and this is in keeping with World Bank data [16]. In contrast to western countries, majority did not had access to any medical insurance [10,17]. Lacking insurance cover, most people from middle and low socio-economic status may feel the burden of intensive care to be unbearable and this may ultimately contribute to high Discharge Against Medical Advise rates, eventual mortality and morbidity. Indian government has recently started low cost life insurance schemes (Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana, Mukhyamantri Amrutum), similar low cost, affordable health insurance schemes may help lower health care burden on individuals in India.

In contrast to Western setups where most of the PICU admissions occur in a planned manner and post-surgical [18], majority of admissions in our study were unplanned as seen earlier [19]. Unplanned admissions do not allow parents to plan for the sudden financial expenditure and can be distressing for parents.

Acute respiratory illness is one of the most common causes of under-five mortality in the country [20]. The median duration of PICU stay (four days) and median duration of hospital stay (six days) in our study corroborates with previous studies [4,21]. Moderate to strong positive correlation between duration of PICU stay (r=0.49), duration of hospital stay (r=0.59) and medical cost is not a new finding, but clinicians should consider early ambulation and discharge in individual cases.

The median (IQR) medical and non-medical cost for the study population was INR 20,000 (IQR: 13725, 50375), and INR 1,200 (IQR: 600, 2525) respectively. When compared with the average income, the median income to cost ratio was 5.5. These findings combined with lack of insurance coverage suggest that direct and indirect expenses incurred from critical care may push parents further into poverty. Variance in medical cost was not significant according to type, time of admission, need for ventilation and diagnosis. This might be because ours is the only tertiary care hospital in nearby rural area which receives critical patients from periphery.

Most of the times the child’s father had to stay away from work to take care of the admitted child. This unplanned leave from work generates indirect cost (loss of wages). Borrowing money from others (relatives/friends) (58%), using savings (28.7%) and selling assets (28%) were the most frequently used household coping strategy. An earlier study on economic and psychological difficulties in parents of patient with epilepsy found that 22% were receiving monetary support from other members in the family [22]. The main challenges confronting free public hospitals are deficient infrastructure, deficient manpower, unmanaged patient load, equivocal quality of services, high out of pocket expenditure [23]. The failure of many government schemes offering free healthcare can be attributed to India’s health policy failures because whatever little is spent on health is not used effectively.

An earlier study found, 55% of the parents had drafted the help of other family members (grandparents, elder children and other senior members in the case of a joint family) to take care of the child [22]. Low levels of psychological problem (n=11) may be due to higher representation of fathers. The level of psychological burden was quite low as compared parents of children with chronic disease [24].

Limitation

Small sample size, data from single private care centre and cross-sectional study design are few limitations of the study. Also, questionnaire was subjected at the time of discharge which might have different level of effect on emotional aspect.

Conclusion

Unplanned admission, lack of insurance cover and significant direct medical cost as inferred from the high income to cost ratio, indirect cost incurred by staying away from work may push already impoverished families further into poverty.

*7 records were excluded from this analysis as these were considered extreme outliers with medical cost >200000 rupees* Krupa is a low-cost health insurance scheme offered by the local hospital

References

[1]Vidyasagar D, Singh M, Bhakoo ON, Paul VK, Narang A, Bhutani V, Evolution of neonatal and pediatric critical care in India Crit Care Clin 1997 13:331-46.10.1016/S0749-0704(05)70313-4  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[2]Iyer PW, Nursing Malpractice. In: Engleman SG, ed Pediatric Nursing Malpractice Issue 2001 Edition 2United StatesLawyers and Judges Publishing Company:191-206.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Diaz-Caneja A, Gledhill J, Weaver T, Nadel S, Garralda E, A child’s admission to hospital: a qualitative study examining the experiences of parents Intensive Care Med 2005 31:1248-54.10.1007/s00134-005-2728-816021417  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Shukla VV, Nimbalkar SM, Ganjiwale JD, John D, Direct cost of critical illness associated healthcare expenditures among children admitted in pediatric intensive care unit in rural India Indian J Pediatr 2016 83:1065-70.10.1007/s12098-016-2165-427246828  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]La Montagne LL, Pawlak R, Stress and coping of parents of children in a pediatric intensive care unit Heart Lung 1990 19:416-21.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Youngblut JM, Brooten D, Kuluz J, Parents’ reactions at 24-48 hrs after a preschool child’s head injury Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005 6:550-56.10.1097/01.PCC.0000163283.27419.E916148816  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Wasserfallen JB, Bossuat C, Perrin E, Cotting J, Cost borne by families of children hospitalised in a paediatric intensive care unit: a pilot study Swiss Med Wkly 2006 136:800-04.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Selvaraj S, Karan AK, Deepening health insecurity in India: evidence from National Sample Surveys since 1980s Economic and Political Weekly 2009 44:55-60.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Kumar A, Jain N, Nandraj S, Furtado K, NSSO 71st Round: Same Data, Multiple Interpretations Economic & Political Weekly 2015 50:84-87.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Jessica, C. Smith, Carla Medalia. Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2014. Current Population Reports. [monograph on intrenet]. [cited on 2015 Nov 26]. Available from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthins/data/incpovhlth/2014/highlights.html  [Google Scholar]

[11]Tendulkar SD, Report of the expert group to review the methodology for estimation of poverty 2009 New DelhiGovernment of India, Planning commission:29  [Google Scholar]

[12]Shijith VP, Sekher TV. Who Gets Health Insurance Coverage In India?: New Findings From Nation-wide Surveys. [monograph on the internet]. [cited 2015 Nov 26]. Availaible from https://iussp.org/sites/default/files/event_call_for_papers/shijith_health%20insurance.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[13]Poverty and Equity. World Bank. [webpage]. [cited on 2015 Oct 31]. Available from http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/country/IND  [Google Scholar]

[14]Daivadanam M, Thankappan KR, Sarma PS, Harikrishnan S, Catastrophic health expenditure and coping strategies associated with acute coronary syndrome in Kerala, India Indian J Med Res 2012 136:585-92.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure J Gen Intern Med 2001 16:606-13.10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x11556941  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]World Development Indicators 2013. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. [webpage]. [cited on 2015 Oct 31]. Availaible from www.worldbank.org  [Google Scholar]

[17]Planning Commission, Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007–12). Volume II: Social Sector 2008 New DelhiOxford University Press  [Google Scholar]

[18]Report of the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS), 2010. [webpage]. [cited on 2015 Oct 31]. Available from http://www.anzics.com.au/core/reports  [Google Scholar]

[19]Khilnani P, Sarma D, Singh R, Uttam R, Rajdev S, Makkar A, Demographic profile and outcome analysis of a tertiary level pediatric intensive care unit Ind J Pediatr 2004 71:587-91.10.1007/BF0272411715280607  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]World Health Organisation: Media centre: fact sheets: Children: reducing mortality. [webpage]. [cited on 2015 Oct 31]. Available from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs178/en  [Google Scholar]

[21]Haque A, Bano S, Clinical profile and outcome in a paediatric intensive care unit in Pakistan J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009 19:534-35.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Thomas SV, Bindu VB, Psychosocial and economic problems of parents of children with epilepsy Br Epilepsy Assoc 1999 8:66-69.10.1053/seiz.1998.024110091852  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Bajpai V, The Challenges Confronting Public Hospitals in India, Their Origins, and Possible Solutions 2014 2014:89850227 pages. doi:10.1155/2014/89850210.1155/2014/898502  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Khanna AK, Prabhakaran A, Patel P, Ganjiwale JD, Nimbalkar SM, Social, psychological and financial burden on caregivers of children with chronic illness: a cross-sectional study Indian J Pediatr 2015 82:1006-11.10.1007/s12098-015-1762-y25976615  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]