JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Biochemistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/37349.12084
Year : 2018 | Month : Oct | Volume : 12 | Issue : 10 Full Version Page : BC27 - BC30

Assessment of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism in Iraqi Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Rana Ali Hamdi1, Zina Hassan Abdul-Qahar2, Shayma Jamal Ahmed3, Raneen Khaleel Tawfeeq4

1 Lecturer, Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
3 Professor, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
4 Assistant Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Rana Ali Hamdi, Lecturer, Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
E-mail: rana.chemist2006@yahoo.com
Abstract

Introduction

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is the most common hormonal disorder in women that occurs mainly in the reproductive age. It is suggested to be highly complex and heterogeneous disorder with an uncertain cause.

Genes included in vitamin D metabolism have been assumed as candidate genes for the PCOS susceptibility. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are suggested to have an influential role in insulin metabolism in women with PCOS.

Aim

To investigate the possible association between Cdx2 (G/A) Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) of vitamin D receptor gene and the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Materials and Methods

The present Case-control study involved 88 women from 18 to 34 years of age in which Group 1 consisted of 45 newly diagnosed women with PCOS while Group 2 consisted of 43 women without PCOS that acted as controls.

DNA samples were amplified and analysed for the Cdx2 (G/A) SNP of vitamin D receptor gene. Genotypic frequency distribution of Cdx2 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene was calculated in women with PCOS and controls. From each serum sample 25-hydroxy vitamin D, calcium, LH, FSH, free testosterone, insulin, and glucose was calculated according to AA, GA, and GG genotypic distribution.

Results

There was no significant difference in genotypic distributions of Cdx2 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene between patients and controls. In addition, the results of patients group were found to be significantly lower for fasting serum glucose (p=0.02), insulin (p=0.01), and Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (p<0.001) inindividuals with AA genotype than individual with GA and GG genotype. While, significantly higher levels of LH (p=0.002) and LH/FSH ratio (p=0.003) inindividual with GG genotype than individual with GA and AA genotype, and no significant difference in mean value of FSH (p=0.148) and free testosterone (p=0.091) between GG, GA, and AA carriers. Likewise, the results were observed significantly lower levels for serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D in GG carriers than GA and AA carriers for both patients (p<0.001) and controls (p<0.001), with no significant difference in mean value of calcium levels between GG, GA and AA carriers for patients (p=0.949) and controls (p=0.46).

Conclusion

Cdx2 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene has an association with severity of clinical features in PCOS; however, not with risk of development of the disease meaning that genetic variation is not directly linked to risk of this syndrome but may indirectly affect disease development via regulation of vitamin D levels.

Keywords

Introduction

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome is the most common hormonal disorder in women that occurs mainly in reproductive age. It is suggested to be highly complex and heterogeneous disorder with an uncertain cause [1].

Insulin Resistance (IR) is predominant in women with this disorder which contribute to reproductive and metabolic defect seen in this syndrome [2]. IR and compensatory hyperinsulinemia lead to increased synthesis of ovarian androgen causing follicular arrest and anovulation [3]. Abnormality in folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis participate in the development of this disorder. These abnormalities may originate from both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors [4].

Genes included in vitamin D metabolism have been assumed as candidate genes for the PCOS susceptibility. Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms were suggested to have an influential role in insulin metabolism in women with PCOS [5].

Many allelic variations (polymorphisms) of the VDR gene located on chromosome 12 are found naturally in the human population [6], with influential differences according to race and ethnicity [7]. Approximately, 200 SNPs of the vitamin D receptor gene are found to be involved [8]. Cdx2, FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI were regarded to be the most common allelic variants in the human population [9].

It has been assumed that SNPs within the VDR gene could affect the VDR amount, stability, and activity as well as the transcription rate of VDR gene [10].

Vitamin D receptor gene is composed of eight exons in the coding region and six extra exons (1a-1f) in the regulatory region, which also includes several promoters [2-9]. Cdx-2 binding region is one functional SNP of the human VDR-1a promoter region [11]. Cdx2 acts as a transcription factor of VDR [12]. Cdx2 (G/A) expression leads to a VDR gene with a defective binding region for the intestine specific-transcription factor CDX2 [12]. This results in diminished intestinal VDR levels [13], with a decrease in active vitamin D that enhances calcium transport proteins and calcium absorption [14]. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate the possible association between Cdx2 (G/A) single nucleotide polymorphism of the VDR gene and the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Materials and Methods

The present case-control study involved 88 women from 18 to 34 years of age. Women were selected from Infertility Center-Baghdad Teaching Hospital during the period of March 2017 to June 2017. Informed consent was taken from each participant. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the College of Medicine/University of Baghdad.

Women with PCOS were diagnosed according to Rotterdam criteria [15], when two out of three following criteria are present, these include oligoovulation and/or anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical evidence of hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries as seen by ultrasound. In addition, controls were defined as healthy women in reproductive age with regular menstrual periods and without PCOS manifestations (hirsutism, acne, alopecia, etc.,).

Women with hyperprolactinemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing’s syndrome, androgen-secreting tumours, diabetes mellitus Type 2, thyroid impairment, impaired renal or hepatic function, women on hormonal replacement therapy, medications’ intake affecting insulin metabolism, and history of calcium or vitamin D supplementation were excluded from the study.

Women were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 45 newly diagnosed women with PCOS while Group 2 consisted of 43 women without PCOS that acted as controls.

Ten millilitres of venous blood was drawn from each woman between 8:00-11:00 am after overnight fast during the follicular phase (second or third day of menstrual periods). Eight millilitres of blood samples were collected in plain tubes which were allowed to clot at room temperature for 30 minutes, then the samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes, the obtained serum was transferred to another tube (Six Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes) and were frozen at –20°C to be analysed later, haemolyzed specimen were discarded. In addition, 2 ml of blood transferred to EDTA tubes were used for analysis of VDR gene polymorphism.

Each serum sample was analysed for measuring 25-hydroxy vitamin D, free testosterone, insulin, Luteinizing Hormone (LH), and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) using kit supplied by (Bioactive-Germany, Demeditec-Germany, Monobind-USA, Human Company-Germany) respectively, while calcium and glucose were measured by spectrophotometer using kits (Human Company-Germany). Additionally, the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using the following equation [16];

HOMA-IR=Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)×Fasting plasma insulin (μU/mL)/405.

Besides, DNA samples were amplified and analysed for the Cdx2 (G/A) SNP of VDR gene.

The Cdx2 polymorphism (rs11568820) was genotyped through Allele Specific Multiple-Polymerase Chain Reaction (ASM-PCR) using predesigned specific primers as described in [Table/Fig-1]. Multiplex-PCR requires multiple primer sets within the same amplification reaction. This allows determining multi-DNA sequences within the same sample. In addition, the involvement of internal controls to evaluate the reliability of the PCR [17].

Primer and product size for Cdx2 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene.

SNPLocationPrimersProduct sizeInternal control
Cdx2 (G/A)exone-1G-Forward:5’-AGG ATA GAG AAA ATA ATA GAA AAC ATT-3’G-Reverse:5’-AAC CCA TAA TAA GAA ATA AGT TTT TAC-3’G-110 bp297 bp(G-forwardA-reverse)
A-Forward:5’-TCC TGA GTA AAC TAG GTC ACA A-3’A-Reverse:5’-ACG TTA AGT TCA GAA AGA TTA ATTC-3’A-235 bp

The reaction was performed in total volume of 50 μl using gold multiplex PCR preMix (Bioneer Corporation, Korea). The premix contained (DNA polymerase, pyrophosphatase and pyrophosphate, dNTPs, reaction buffer, tracking dye, and stabilizer. 25 μL of PCR premix, 6 μL of DNA sample, 1 μL of each forward and reverse primers and deionized sterile distilled water (DNase, RNase free) was added to complete reaction volume. PCR condition was performed under following conditions [Table/Fig-2].

PCR conditions.

No.StepsTemperatureTimeCycles
1Pre-denaturation95°C5 minutes1
2Denaturation95°C30 seconds30
3Annealing60°C30 seconds30
4Extension72°C1 minutes30
5Final extension72°C5 minutes1

The amplicons were electrophoresed with 100 bp ladder (Bioneer Corporation, Korea) to detect the size of fragments on 2% agarose gel. Gel visualised in Gel Documentation System/UV transilluminator to reveal bands were interpreted as primers G-Forward and G-Reverse generate a 110 bp fragment when the G-allele is found while primers A-Forward and A-Reverse generate a 235 bp fragment when the A-allele is found. The primers G-Forward and A-Reverse generate a 297 bp fragment, which is considered as an internal control and is independent of the appearance of either the G or A allele [14].

Statistical Analysis

Data interpretation was carried out by using SPSS-24.0 (Statistical Packages for Social Sciences-version 24). Data was presented in simple measures of percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The significance of the difference of different means was assessed by using ANOVA test for difference among more than two independent means. Also, the significance of difference on different percentages was evaluated by using Pearson chi-square test. In addition, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the strength of association between Cdx2 polymorphism of VDR gene and PCOS risk. Odds ratios were also calculated for allele frequency comparison (G vs A).

Hormonal and metabolic status in women with PCOS was assessed according to genotypic distributions of Cdx2 polymorphism. Moreover, vitamin D and calcium levels were calculated in respect with a genotypic distribution of Cdx2 polymorphism in both patients and controls.

Results

There was no significant difference in genotypic frequencies distribution of Cdx2 polymorphism of VDR gene between women with PCOS and controls. In addition, odds ratio for GG carriers was 1.93 (95% CI=0.83-4.48), for AA carriers it was 0.95 (95% CI=0.31-2.93) while for GA carriers it was 0.52 (95% CI=0.22-1.23) as shown in [Table/Fig-3].

Allelic and Genotypic frequency distributions of Cdx2 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene among women with PCOS and controls.

Genotype or AllelePCOS (n=45)Controls (n=43)Odds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp-value
No.%No.%
GG2453.3%1637.2%1.930.83-4.480.141
GA1431.1%2046.5%0.520.22-1.230.189
AA715.6%716.3%0.950.31-2.93NS
G-allele6268.95260.5%1.450.78-2.690.271
A-allele2831.1%3439.5%0.690.37-1.280.271

*Significant difference between proportions using Pearson Chi-square test at 0.05 level; NS: Not significant


Additionally, metabolic and endocrine features of PCOS group were assessed by calculation of mean value of fasting serum glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, LH, FSH, LH/FSH ratio, and free testosterone according to GG, GA, and AA carriers. The results were found significantly lower fasting serum glucose (p=0.02), insulin (p=0.01), and HOMA-IR (p<0.001) in AA carriers than GA and GG carriers. Furthermore, levels of LH (p=0.002) and LH/FSH ratio (p=0.003) were significantly higher in GG carriers than GA and AA carriers (p=0.002), while no significant difference in the mean value of FSH (p=0.148) and free testosterone (p=0.091) was observed between GG, GA, and AA carriers as shown in [Table/Fig-4].

Mean value of fasting serum glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, LH, FSH, LH/FSH ratio and free testosterone levels according to GG, GA, and AA carriers of Cdx2 polymorphism for patients group.

ParametersGG (n=24)GA (n=14)AA (n=7)p-value
Mean±SDMean±SDMean±SD
Fasting serum glucose (mg/dL)95.02±2.8593.32±4.0889.97±1.670.02*
Fasting serum insulin (μU/mL)14.25±1.2314.4±1.0612.4±0.6040.01*
HOMA-IR3.34±0.2753.31±0.272.75±0.16<0.001*
serum LH (IU/L)10.17±2.277.48±2.357.51±2.230.002*
serum FSH (IU/L)5.16±0.474.89±0.445.31±0.730.148
serum LH/FSH ratio1.97±0.451.53±0.471.41±0.360.003*
Serum free testosterone (pg/mL)5.27±0.475.50±0.515.04±0.120.091

*Significant difference among more than two independent means using ANOVA test at 0.05 level.


Likewise, mean value of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and calcium levels were calculated according to GG, GA and AA carriers for both PCOS group and controls group. The results observed significantly lower levels of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D in GG carriers than GA and AA carriers for both patients (p<0.001) and controls (p<0.001), with no significant difference in the mean value of calcium levels between GG, GA and AA carriers for patients (p=0.949) and controls (p=0.46) as demonstrated in [Table/Fig-5].

Mean value of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and calcium levels according to GG, GA, and AA carriers of Cdx2 polymorphism for patients and controls.

ParametersA and/or G carriersserum 25-OH vitamin D (ng/mL)serum Calcium (mg/dL)
Mean±SDMean±SD
PCOSGG (n=24)5.73±0.868.21±0.09
GA (n=14)8.1507±2.038.213±0.08
AA (7)10.74±2.768.2±0.081
p-value<0.001*0.949
ControlsGG (16)13.71±3.338.93±0.253
GA (20)20.202±5.869.12±0.259
AA (7)24.22±5.469.15±0.19
p-value<0.001*0.46

*Significant difference among more than two independent means using ANOVA test at 0.05 level.


Discussion

In the present study, Cdx2 (G/A) single nucleotide polymorphism of the VDR gene was examined among women with PCOS and assessed for their effect on vitamin D levels and/or PCOS manifestations. The results found no significant difference in genotypic frequency distributions between women with PCOS and controls and suggested non significant association between Cdx2 polymorphism and PCOS risk. In this regard, an Austrian study showed no significant difference in the genotype frequencies of Cdx2 polymorphism between PCOS patients and controls but found an association between Cdx2 polymorphism and insulin metabolism [18]. In contrast, an Indian study found significant difference in the genotype and allele frequency distributions of the Cdx2 polymorphism between patients with PCOS and controls and suggested protective effect of Cdx2 polymorphism against PCOS manifestations [19].

A study by Zadeh-Vakili A et al., suggested that genetic variation of the VDR was associated with severity of clinical manifestations of PCOS; however, not with risk of the disease [20]. While a recent study by Siddamalla S et al., found an association between VDR gene polymorphisms and PCOS risk [21].

Prior evidence also proposed that VDR gene polymorphisms were found to be associated with vitamin D deficiency as well as metabolic and endocrine abnormalities seen in PCOS [18,22]. In addition, the pathogenesis of PCOS has been associated with impacts of (TaqI, BsmI, FokI, ApaI andCdx2 polymorphisms) of VDRs gene on LH and SHBG levels [23], testosterone levels [18], serum insulin levels and IR in women with PCOS [3,18,22].

The concept that active vitamin D and its receptor were included in metabolic and endocrine disturbance seen in PCOS is assisted by the fact that the VDRs manage more than 3% of the human genome, involving genes that are critical for glucose homeostasis [24]. More precisely, VDR is found in 2776 genomic positions that alter the expression of 229 genes in various tissue, including skeletal muscle, brain, breast, pancreas, parathyroid glands, immune cells, cardiac cell, ovaries [24-26], pituitary gland, and human endometrium [27]. Thus, vitamin D affects a wide range of physiological processes [24].

Besides the expression of the VDR in beta cells of pancreas might illustrate impact of vitamin D on insulin secretion [28]. Also, the presence of Vitamin D Response Element (VDRE) in the insulin receptor gene explains the mechanism by which vitamin D deficiency could influence insulin sensitivity [29]. This evidence was supported by prior research which found significant associations between VDR gene variants and insulin sensitivity [30].

The findings of the present study showed significantly lower serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels and higher LH and LH/FSH ratio for individual with GG genotype than others with AA and GA genotype. Also, results showed odds ratio for G-allele of Cdx2 polymorphism was 1.45 (95% CI=0.78-2.69) and for GG carriers 1.93 (95% CI=0.83-4.48), which indicate nearly two fold increased risk of disease for GG carriers than AA and GA carriers. These results agree with previous studies [12,31] which identified that G-allele of Cdx2 polymorphism is accountable for decreasing of transcriptional activity of VDR gene. Thus, lower transcriptional activity of VDR alters several functions managed by active vitamin D [31].

Additionally, the result of the present study revealed that lower levels of fasting serum glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR for PCOS cases with Cdx2-AA genotype than GG or GA genotype which is similar to another study by Wehr E et al., [18]. This may be clarified by previous studies which supposed that Cdx2-A allele carriers have higher intestinal calcium absorption due to increased expression of intestinal calcium channel protein [32]. Calcium has important role in the regulation of insulin secretion by pancreatic beta cells. Thus, VDR gene polymorphism may affect beta cell of the pancreas [18].

Recent study by Reis GV et al., suggested that Cdx2 polymorphism is the variant with probable link with the susceptibility as well as severity of this syndrome, involving greater IR, fasting insulin, testosterone levels, body mass index, lower vitamin D levels, and exhibits more significant odds ratio values when PCOS and control groups are compared. Moreover, serum vitamin D levels have a greater effect on PCOS manifestations compared to VDR gene polymorphisms, as vitamin D deficiency has an impact on severity of the PCOS and influences metabolic as well as anthropometric parameters. Furthermore, vitamin D supplementation had an influential role in the management of PCOS features, enhancing the contribution of vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of this syndrome [33].

Limitation

In terms of limitations, a small sample size together with the single VDR gene polymorphism was examined. These limitations may be improved by increasing sample size as well as studying additional SNPs of VDR gene such as TaqI, BsmI, FokI, and ApaI polymorphisms.

Conclusion

Cdx2 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene has an association with severity of clinical features in PCOS, however not with risk of development of the disease meaning that genetic variation is not directly linked to risk of this syndrome but may indirectly affect disease development via regulation of vitamin D levels.

*Significant difference between proportions using Pearson Chi-square test at 0.05 level; NS: Not significant*Significant difference among more than two independent means using ANOVA test at 0.05 level.*Significant difference among more than two independent means using ANOVA test at 0.05 level.

References

[1]Azziz R, Woods KS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz BO, The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syndrome in an unselected population J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004 89(6):2745-49.10.1210/jc.2003-03204615181052  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Azziz R, Carmina E, Chen Z, Dunaif A, Laven JS, Legro RS, Polycystic ovary syndrome Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016 2:1605710.1038/nrdp.2016.5727510637  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Essah PA, Nestler JE, Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinism in the polycystic ovary syndrome. in: Azziz R, Nestler JE, Dewailly D, editors contemporary endocrinology: androgen excess disorders in women: polycystic ovary syndrome and other disorders 2006 2nd editionTotowa, NJHumana Press Inc.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R, Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011 7(4):219-31.10.1038/nrendo.2010.21721263450  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alkharfy KM, Khan N, Mohammed AK, Vinodson B, Association of VDR-gene variants with factors related to the metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes and vitamin D deficiency Gene 2014 542(2):129-33.10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.04424680778  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Koshiyama H, Sone T, Nakao K, Vitamin-D-receptor-gene polymorphism and bone loss Lancet 1995 345(8955):990-91.10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90740-8  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[7]Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Van Leeuwen JP, Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms Gene 2004 338(2):143-56.10.1016/j.gene.2004.05.01415315818  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Fuhrman BJ, Freedman DM, Bhatti P, Doody MM, Fu YP, Chang SC, Sunlight, polymorphisms of vitamin D-related genes and risk of breast cancer Anticancer Res 2013 33(2):543-51.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Fang Y, van Meurs JB, d’Alesio A, Jhamai M, Zhao H, Rivadeneira F, Promoter and 3’-untranslated-region haplotypes in the Vitamin D Receptor gene predispose to osteoporotic fracture: the Rotterdam Study Am J Hum Genet 2005 77(5):807-23.10.1086/49743816252240  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Baker AR, McDonnell DP, Hughes M, Crisp TM, Mangelsdorf DJ, Haussler MR, Cloning the expression of full length cDNA encoding human vitamin D receptor Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988 85(10):3294-98.10.1073/pnas.85.10.32942835767  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Jehan F, d’Alésio A, Garabédian M, Exons and functional regions of the human vitamin D receptor gene around and within the main 1a promoter are well conserved among mammals J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2007 103(3-5):361-67.10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.12.05717289378  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Arai H, Miyamoto KI, Yoshida M, Yamamoto H, Taketani Y, Morita K, The polymorphism in the caudal-related homeodomain protein Cdx-2 binding element in the human vitamin D receptor gene J Bone Miner Res 2001 16(7):1256-64.10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.125611450701  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Yamamoto H, Miyamoto K, Li B, Taketani Y, Kitano M, Inoue Y, The caudal-related homeodomain protein Cdx-2 regulates vitamin D receptor gene expression in the small intestine J Bone Miner Res 1999 14(2):240-47.10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.2.2409933478  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Fang Y, van Meurs JB, Bergink AP, Hofman A, van Duijn CM, van Leeuwen JP, Cdx-2 polymorphism in the promoter region of the human vitamin D receptor gene determines susceptibility to fracture in the elderly J Bone Miner Res 2003 18(9):1632-41.10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.9.163212968672  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop GroupRevised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome Fertil Steril 2004 81:19-25.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[16]Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC, Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and b-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man Diabetologia 1985 28(7):412-19.10.1007/BF002808833899825  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Sachse K, Specificity and Performance of Diagnostic PCR Assays. In: Sachse K, Frey J, editors PCR Detection of Microbial Pathogens. Methods in Molecular BiologyTM 2003 Humana Press10.1385/1592593445  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[18]Wehr E, Trummer O, Giuliani A, Gruber HJ, Pieber TR, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Vitamin D-associated polymorphisms are related to insulin resistance and vitamin D deficiency in polycystic ovary syndrome Eur J Endocrinol 2011 164(5):741-49.10.1530/EJE-11-013421389086  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Dasgupta S, Dutta J, Annamaneni S, Kudugunti N, Battini MR, Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with polycystic ovary syndrome among Indian women Indian J Med Res 2015 142(3):276-85.10.4103/0971-5916.16658726458343  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Zadeh-Vakili A, Ramezani Tehrani F, Daneshpour MS, Zarkesh M, Saadat N, Azizi F, Genetic polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene affects the phenotype of PCOS Gene 2013 515(1):193-96.10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.04923246977  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Siddamalla S, Reddy TV, Govatati S, Erram N, Deenadayal M, Shivaji S, Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of polycystic ovary syndrome in South Indian women Gynecol Endocrinol 2018 34(2):161-65.10.1080/09513590.2017.137112828868946  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Mahmoudi T, Genetic variation in the vitamin D receptor and polycystic ovary syndrome risk Fertil Steril 2009 92(4):1381-83.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.00219501823  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Ranjzad F, Mahban A, Shemirani AI, Mahmoudi T, Vahedi M, Nikzamir A, Influence of gene variants related to calcium homeostasis on biochemical parameters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome J Assist Reprod Genet 2011 28(3):225-32.10.1007/s10815-010-9506-421082232  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Holick MF, Vitamin D deficiency N Engl J Med 2007 357(3):266-81.10.1056/NEJMra07055317634462  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Ramagopalan SV, Heger A, Berlanga AJ, Maugeri NJ, Lincoln MR, Burrell A, A chip-seq defined genome-wide map of vitamin d receptor binding: Associations with disease and evolution Genome Res 2010 20(10):1352-60.10.1101/gr.107920.11020736230  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]He C, Lin Z, Robb SW, Ezeamama AE, Serum Vitamin D levels and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nutrients 2015 7(6):4555-77.10.3390/nu706455526061015  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Lerchbaum E, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Vitamin D and fertility: a systematic review Eur J Endocrinol 2012 166(5):765-78.10.1530/EJE-11-098422275473  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]DeLuca HF, Therapeutic potential of the 2-alkyl and 2-alkylidene-19-nor-20S-modified analogs of 1a, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004 89-90(1-5):67-73.10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.10415225749  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Hahn S, Haselhorst U, Tan S, Quadbeck B, Schmidt M, Roesler S, Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with insulin resistance and obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006 114(10):577-83.10.1055/s-2006-94830817177140  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Maestro B, Dávila N, Carranza MC, Calle C, Identification of a Vitamin D response element in the human insulin receptor gene promoter J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003 84(2-3):223-30.10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00032-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[31]Iqbal Mu, Khan TA, Maqbool SA, Vitamin D Receptor Cdx-2 polymorphism and premenopausal breast cancer risk in southern Pakistani patients PLOS ONE 2015 10(3):1-12.10.1371/journal.pone.012265725799416  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Van Cromphaut SJ, Dewerchin M, Hoenderop JG, Stockmans I, Van Herck E, Kato S, Duodenal calcium absorption in vitamin D receptor-knockout mice: functional and molecular aspects Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 98(23):13324-29.10.1073/pnas.23147469811687634  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Reis GV, Gontijo NA, Rodrigues KF, Alves MT, Ferreira CN, Gomes KB, Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and the polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017 43(3):436-46.10.1111/jog.1325028127831  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]