JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Genetics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/36923.12060
Year : 2018 | Month : Sep | Volume : 12 | Issue : 09 Full Version Page : GC07 - GC10

Evaluation of Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Sudanese

Nadir Ahmed Ibrahim1, Fathelrahman M Hassan Gameel2, Mahmoud Mohamed Elgari3, Sana Eltahir Abdalla4

1 Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, College of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Hematology and Immunohematology, Clinical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
4 Professor, Department of Hematology, Neelain Medical Research Centre, Al Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Nadir Ahmed Ibrahim, Lecturer, Department of Hematology and Immunohematology Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
E-mail: nadir.ibrahim@outlook.com
Abstract

Introduction

Thrombophilia is a multi-factorial hypercoagulability disorder. The predisposing factors may be inherited, acquired or both. Factor V Leiden prothrombin 20210G>A mutations are the most common inherited factors.

Aim

This study was aimed to investigate the prevalence of Factor V Leiden (1691G>A) and prothrombin 20210G>A mutations in Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) patients and to investigate the role of non-genetic risk factors in the manifestation of DVT.

Materials and Methods

A total of 192 Sudanese subjects were examined, including 100 DVT patients and 92 healthy controls. Demographic and clinical data were collected using a specific questionnaire. Citrated blood samples of patients and controls were used for coagulation assays, and DNAs isolated from Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-blood samples were used for the detection of Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A mutations using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis.

Results

Out of all the subjects, none of the 192 subjects carried the Factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210G>A mutations. No significant differences were detected in the prevalence of DVT between males and females. The prothrombin fragment 1+2, Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), and D-dimer levels were significantly elevated in DVT patients than in healthy controls (p<0.05). Immobility status and cardiovascular disease were most significantly associated with age (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A mutations were not accountable for DVT in the Sudanese population examined in this study.

Keywords

Introduction

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism forms Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), a potentially life threatening disease caused by multiple interactions between different inherited and environmental factors. The environmental risk factors include prolonged immobility, surgery, malignant diseases, heart disease, pregnancy, hormone therapy, and oral contraceptives, and are mostly identified in young and middle-aged individuals [1]. Although, VTE is uncommon among individuals younger than 40 years of age, it affects more females than males in this age group [2], possibly because of the presence of risk factors, such as pregnancy and the use of oral contraceptives [3]. By contrast, the incidence of VTE in older adults (>40 years of age) is similar in both males and females [2] and affects 1-2 adults per 1000, annually [4]. Therefore, it is important to identify individuals at risk and to offer them adequate treatment and/or prophylaxis [5].

Among the genetic risk factors, mutation in Factor V gene is the most common mutation underlying hereditary thrombophilia in Western countries [6]. Factor V Leiden variant is a mutant form of factor V that is common among Caucasians and Middle-Easterners and moderately prevalent among Hispanic Americans, Indians, and Africans [7,8]. The factor V Leiden mutation renders activated Factor V (FVa) resistant to cleavage by Activated Protein C (APC), which results in an increased rate of thrombin generation and higher levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2 [9-11]. This mutation confers a 5 to 10-fold greater risk of DVT among heterozygous individuals and a 50 to 100-fold greater risk among homozygotes compared with normal individuals [12]. Factor V Leiden is identified in approximately 20% of patients diagnosed with VTE. Genetic testing for Factor V Leiden is used in cases showing equivocal results of a modified APC resistance-screening assay to provide appropriate clinical management [13].

The second most common genetic risk factor for hereditary thrombophilia is the G to A substitution at nucleotide position 20210 in the 3’UTR of the prothrombin gene, which leads to an increase in prothrombin production and 3-fold greater risk of DVT [8,14]. Prothrombin 20210G>A mutation is an autosomal dominant trait. It has the highest prevalence among Caucasians of European origin, with a carrier frequency of 1-3% in the general population and approximately 6% of VTE and in 10% in patients with thrombophilic families [10].

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in factor V and prothrombin genes are frequently co-inherited [11] and are genotyped via (PCR-RFLP) analysis. Risk for VTE is higher in individuals carrying both gene mutations compared with those carrying one of these gene mutations [15]. However, whether these gene mutations cause mortality among African populations, especially the Sudanese, remains controversial [16-18]. Moreover, the role of environmental risk factors in the development of DVT in the Sudanese population is poorly characterised.

The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of the two mutations in Sudanese DVT patients, and to investigate the role of environmental risk factors in the manifestation of DVT.

Materials and Methods

Study Group

This case-control study was conducted at the Sudan University of Science and Technology research laboratory from July 2014 to July 2017 in Khartoum, Sudan. A total of 192 Sudanese individuals were recruited for this study, including 100 patients (75 females and 25 males) with a confirmed DVT diagnosis based on the results of duplex ultrasound and 92 healthy controls (61 females and 31 males). The age range of patients was 19-90 years, while that of controls was 18-71 years. The mean age±Standard Deviation (SD) of the patients and controls was 41.60±17.28 years and 31.65±10.08, years respectively.

Inclusion criteria: The study included only adult duplex ultrasonography DVT diagnostic patients who accepted to participate and who demonstrated positive D dimer test.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects who were younger than 18 years or who refused to participate were excluded.

Subjects in the control group had no previous history of VTE or other coagulation disorders. The demographic and clinical data of all participants were collected using a standardised questionnaire. Obesity was defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or above. Physician’s assessment was accepted in cases where weight and height data were unavailable. EDTA-blood and citrated blood samples were collected from each individual for DNA extraction and coagulation tests, respectively. Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted in compliance with relevant national regulations, institutional policies, and the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of Sudan University of Science and Technology [R#2014/7/7].

DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using the G-spin DNA extraction kit (iNtRON Biotechnology Inc., Jungwon-gu, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Coagulation Assays

Coagulation tests, including Prothrombin Time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were performed using STart 4 Haemostasis Analyser (Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France). Fibrinogen assays and D-dimer tests were performed using Multifibren U and Innovance D-dimer reagents, respectively, with BCS XP System (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). The APC resistance test (APC-R) was performed using STA-STACLOT (Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France). Sandwich Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) was performed for the quantitative detection of prothrombin fragment 1+2 using Human Prothrombin Fragment 1+2 ELISA Kit (Abbexa, Cambridge Science Park, UK).

Factor V Leiden Genotyping

Genotyping for Factor V Leiden was performed using PCR-RFLP analysis with HindIII restriction endonuclease. A 241 bp fragment encompassing the 1691G>A substitution of factor V exon 10 was PCR amplified as previously described using the forward primer 5’-TCAGGCAGGAACAACACCAT-3’ and reverse primer 5’-GGTTACTTCAAGGACAAAATACCTGTAAAGCT-3 [19]. The expected banding patterns of digested PCR products were a 241 bp fragment for the wild-type allele, 209 bp and 32 bp fragments for factor V Leiden homozygotes, and all three molecular weight bands for factor V Leiden heterozygotes.

Prothrombin 20210G>A Genotyping

Prothrombin gene polymorphism was detected according to method described by Poort SR et al., [8]. Forward and reverse primers used for exon 14 were 5’-TCTAGAAACAGTTGCCTGGC-3’ and 5’-ATAGCACTGGGAGCATTGAAGC-3’, respectively. For RFLP analysis, PCR products were digested with HindIII. The expected banding patterns were a 345 bp fragment for the wild-type allele, 322 bp and 32 bp fragments for homozygous mutants, and both molecular weight bands for heterozygous mutant.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0; Armonk, NY, USA). Significant differences in continuous variables were analysed using the Student’s t-test. Results were expressed as mean±SD. A p-value less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

In the present study, we evaluated 100 patients (25 males, 75 females) with proven DVT diagnosis and 92 healthy controls (31 males, 61 females). No significant differences in the prevalence of DVT were detected between males and females (p=0.185). Among the 100 patients studied, DVT was the most prevalent at age 18 to 45 years in both males (n=16; 22.9%) and females (n=54; 77.1%).

The 100 DVT patients were divided into three age groups (18-45 years, 46-65 years, and 66-90 years) and assessed for the environmental risk factors that are generally known to predispose them to DVT [Table/Fig-1]. Risk factors, namely, immobility status and cardiovascular disease were the most significantly associated with age (p<0.0001). Previous history of DVT was found in 73.3% of patients in the age group of 66-90 years (n=15). About 93.3% of the DVTs were localised in the left leg and 6.7% in the right leg. Additionally, 88% of the DVTs were proximal and 12% were distal. Proximal DVT was significantly associated with age in all age groups (p<0.0001).

Demographic and clinical characteristics of DVT patients categorised in three age groups.

CharateristicsAge group
18-45 years46-65 years66-90 years
F%F%F%p-valuea
GenderMale1622.9320.0640.00.368
Female5477.11280.0960.0
DiagnosisProximal DVT70100.01066.7853.3<0.0001*
Distal DVT00.0533.3746.7
Previous history of DVTYes00.0213.31173.3<0.0001*
No70100.01386.7426.7
Affected legRight leg68.600.016.70.830
Left leg6491.415100.01493.3
ObesityYes57.116.700.00.827
No6592.91493.315100.0
Hormonal TherapyNo70100.015100.015100.0NA
Oral ContraceptivesYes1935.2216.700.00.059
No3564.81083.39100.0
Cigarette SmokingYes1014.3213.300.00.389
No6085.71386.715100.0
Under SurgeryYes3042.9320.0426.70.167
No4057.11280.01173.3
Bone FractureYes34.300.000.01.000
No6795.715100.015100.0
Immobility StatusYes57.100.01066.7<0.0001*
No6592.915100.0533.3
Cardiovascular DiseaseYes22.9426.71280.0<0.0001*
No6897.11173.3320.0
Renal FailureYes22.916.700.00.661
No6897.11493.315100.0
CancerYes34.300.016.70.766
No6795.715100.01493.3
Anticoagulant therapyHeparin4462.9853.316.71.000
Warfarin00.000.0213.3
Heparin and Warfarin2637.1746.71280.0
Factor VHomozygous wild-type (G/G)70100.015100.015100.0NA
Prothrombin geneHomozygous wild-type (G/G)70100.015100.015100.0NA

ap-values were determined using Student’s t-test; NA: Not applicable; F: Frequency; *significant


Significant differences were observed between DVT patients and healthy controls in the levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2, PT, APTT, and D-dimer (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-2]. None of the 100 DVT patients tested positive for factor V Leiden mutation [Table/Fig-3] or the prothrombin 20210G>A mutation [Table/Fig-4]. All 92 healthy controls were negative for both these mutations. As a result, no correlation against the risk factors was possible.

Summary of coagulation characteristics of blood samples obtained from 100 Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) patients and 92 healthy controls of Sudanese origin.

Coagulation characteristicsSubjectsMean±SDp-valuea
Prothrombin Time (s)Patients23.36±9.62<0.0001*
Controls11.41±0.83
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (s)Patients41.82±13.59<0.0001*
Controls31.05±6.08
D-dimer (mg/L)Patients0.67±0.200.044
Controls0.30±0.16
Prothrombin Fragment 1+2 (ng/mL)Patients12.38±1.32<0.0001*
Controls4.99±2.44
Activated Protein C resistance (Ratio)Patients2.66±0.300.850
Controls2.67±0.34
Fibrinogen (gm/L)Patients2.93±0.460.766
Control2.90±0.49

aStatistical significance of the differences between patients and controls were determined using Student’s t-test; *significant


Ethidium bromide-stained gel image showing PCR-RFLP analysis of seven representative samples for detecting factor V Leiden mutation. All samples carried the wild-type allele of factor V, indicated by the 241bp band. AL: 100 bp Allelic leader, 1: undigested PCR product (241 bp), and 2-8: PCR products digested with HindIII.

Ethidium bromide-stained gel image showing PCR-RFLP analysis of twelve representative samples for detecting prothrombin 20210G>A mutation. All samples carried the wild-type allele of prothrombin, indicated by the 345 bp band. AL: 100 bp Allelic leader, 7: undigested PCR product (345 bp) amplicon, 1-6 and 8–13: PCR products digested with HindIII.

Discussion

Deep vein thrombosis is the most common clinical manifestation of venous thromboembolism and a common cause of death and disability in developing countries [20]. The occurrence of DVT involves the interaction of multiple inherited factors and different modifiable and non-modifiable environmental influential factors [4,21]. The determination of these risk factors heavily influences the prevention strategies of local healthcare agencies. Among the genetic causes of DVT, Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A mutations are the most common [22]. Carriers of these polymorphisms are prone to spontaneous or secondary venous thrombotic events at any age [23]. The main environmental risk factors for DVT include old age, obesity, history of VTE, cancer, bed rest for more than five days, surgery, congestive heart failure, bone fracture, hormone therapy, and pregnancy. The risk of DVT increases several folds when both genetic and environmental factors co-exist [24].

In the present study, we evaluated a total of 192 individuals of Sudanese origin, out of which 100 were DVT patients and 92 were healthy controls. None of the 192 individuals carried Factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210G>A mutations, indicating the absence of a potential genetic drift due to founder effect that may be present in individuals of European origin [25,26]. Moreover, these data also showed that neither one of these gene mutations were associated with DVT in individuals of Sudanese origin, which is consistent with a previous study on an African population [18]. Similarly, Factor V Leiden has been shown to be absent in 1600 individuals from Africa, Southeast Asia, Australasia, and the Americas [27]. The present study results were consistent with a previous study reported that factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210G>A mutations were not associated with thrombophilia [28]. Factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations were absent in DVT cases studied in Chinese population [29]. Moreover, Prothrombin gene mutation as risk for inherited thrombophlia was absent or occurs in a very low frequency in both thrombophilic patients and healthy controls of most South Asian populations [30].

However, a previous meta-analysis has shown that the Factor V Leiden mutation is associated with the risk of DVT in other populations [31]. Also, present study findings were in contrast with a previous study in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A mutations were associated with DVT in Bosnian population [32].

In agreement with the results reported by Satoshi O et al., significantly higher levels of plasma D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1+2 were detected in DVT patients than those in healthy controls [33]. No significant differences were observed in the prevalence of DVT between male and female patients in this study in comparison with healthy subjects. However, among younger adults (≤45 years of age), DVT was more prevalent in females than in males, which is consistent with previously published data [4,34].

The present study data showed that 13% of DVT patients, most of who were in the age group of 66-90 years had previously had single or recurrent episodes of DVT. This is consistent with the results of Anderson FA and Spencer FA showing that the previous history of VTE is significantly associated with increased risk of DVT [24]. Additionally, immobility and cardiovascular disease were found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of DVT among the elderly, which is in agreement with the results of Engbers MJ et al., [35]. A significant association between the use of oral contraceptives and DVT development in female patients in the age group from 18-45 years was identified in present study, this was in the same line with previous studies on the increased risk of VTE and oral contraceptives usage in young females [36]. The present study findings of other environmental risk factors were consistent with previous studies [24], except for obesity (6%), which maybe because of dietary and behavioral differences. The present study confirms the findings of previous studies that have reported the predominance of left-sided DVT [37]. The reason behind the left-side predominance is unknown. Previous studies proposed that left-sided DVTs may be related to compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery [37,38]. Additionally, we observed that in most of the cases, DVTs were proximal. This was in complete agreement with a previous study [39].

Limitation

Nonetheless, there were certain limitations in this study. Specifically, the relatively small sample size was used. It is recommended that the future studies be performed with larger sample size which covers all the states of Sudan. Moreover, further investigations into other possible causes of hereditary thrombophilia are needed, such as 677 (C>T) Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) mutation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, although factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A mutations are considered as genetic risk factors for DVT, these mutations were not associated with DVT in the Sudanese population examined in present study.

ap-values were determined using Student’s t-test; NA: Not applicable; F: Frequency; *significantaStatistical significance of the differences between patients and controls were determined using Student’s t-test; *significant

References

[1]Lippi G, Franchini M, Pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism: when the cup runneth over Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 2008 34(8):747-61.10.1055/s-0029-114525719214913  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Moores L, Bilello KL, Murin S, Sex and gender issues and venous thromboembolism Clinics in Chest Medicine. Elsevier BV 2004 25(2):281-97.10.1016/j.ccm.2004.01.01315099889  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Romero A, Alonso C, Rincón M, Medrano J, Santos JM, Calderón E, Risk of venous thromboembolic disease in women European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2005 121(1):08-17.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.02315950363  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]White RH, The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism Circulation 2003 107(23 Suppl 1):14-18.10.1161/01.CIR.0000078468.11849.6612814979  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Bertina RM, Factor V Leiden and other coagulation factor mutations affecting thrombotic risk Clinical Chemistry 1997 43(9):1678  [Google Scholar]

[6]Bafunno V, Margaglione M, Genetic basis of thrombosis Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2010 :S4110.1515/CCLM.2010.36121034258  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Bertina RM, Koeleman BPC, Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Dirven RJ, de Ronde H, Mutation in blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance to activated protein C Nature 1994 369:6410.1038/369064a08164741  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM, A common genetic variation in the 3’-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis Blood 1996 88(10):3698-703.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Simioni P, Scarano L, Gavasso S, Sardella C, Girolami B, Scudeller A, Prothrombin fragment 1+2 and thrombin–antithrombin complex levels in patients with inherited APC resistance due to factor V Leiden mutation British Journal of Haematology 1996 92(2):435-41.10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1500.x8603014  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Franco RF, Reitsma PH, Genetic risk factors of venous thrombosis Human Genetics 2001 109(4):369-84.10.1007/s00439010059311702218  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Robetorye RS, Rodgers GM, Update on selected inherited venous thrombotic disorders American Journal of Hematology 2001 68(4):256-68.10.1002/ajh.1000211754415  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Svensson PJ, Zoller B, Dahlback B, Evaluation of original and modified APC-resistance tests in unselected outpatients with clinically suspected thrombosis and in healthy controls Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1997 77(2):332-35.10.1055/s-0038-16559649157592  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Genetics of venous thrombosis Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2009 7(s1):301-04.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03394.x19630821  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: routine testing for Factor V Leiden (R506Q) and prothrombin (20210G>A) mutations in adults with a history of idiopathic venous thromboembolism and their adult family members Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 2011 13(1):67-76.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Emmerich J, Rosendaal FR, Cattaneo M, Margaglione M, De Stefano V, Cumming T, Combined effect of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A on the risk of venous thromboembolism-pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies including 2310 cases and 3204 controls. Study Group for Pooled-Analysis in Venous Thromboembolism Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2001 86(3):809-16.10.1055/s-0037-161613611583312  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Patel RK, Ford E, Thumpston J, Arya R, Risk factors for venous thrombosis in the black population Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2003 90(5):835-38.10.1160/TH03-05-031114597978  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Awad-Elkareem A, Elzaki SG, Khalid H, Abdallah MS, Adam I, A low rate of factor V Leiden mutation among Sudanese women with deep venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2017 37(7):963-64.10.1080/01443615.2017.130603328395587  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Fall AO, Proulle V, Sall A, Mbaye A, Ba PS, Diao M, Risk factors for thrombosis in an african population Clinical Medicine Insights Blood Disorders 2014 7:01-06.10.4137/CMBD.S1340125512718  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Gandrille S, Alhenc-Gelas M, Aiach M, A rapid screening method for the factor V Arg506->Gln mutation Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis: An International Journal in Haemostasis and Thrombosis 1995 6(3):245-48.10.1097/00001721-199505000-000087654939  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Raskob GE, Angchaisuksiri P, Blanco AN, Buller H, Gallus A, Hunt BJ, Thrombosis: a major contributor to global disease burden Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014 34(11):2363-71.10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.30448825304324  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Bulger CM, Jacobs C, Patel NH, Epidemiology of acute deep vein thrombosis Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology 2004 7(2):50-54.10.1053/j.tvir.2004.02.001  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[22]De Stefano V, Martinelli I, Mannucci PM, Paciaroni K, Chiusolo P, Casorelli I, The risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis among heterozygous carriers of both factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation The New England Journal of Medicine 1999 341(11):801-06.10.1056/NEJM19990909341110410477778  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]De Stefano V, Rossi E, Paciaroni K, D’Orazio A, Cina G, Marchitelli E, Different circumstances of the first venous thromboembolism among younger or older heterozygous carriers of the G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene Haematologica 2003 88(1):61-66.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Anderson FA, Spencer FA, Risk factors for venous thromboembolism Circulation 2003 107(23 suppl 1):0I-09./10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E612814980  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Jadaon MM, Epidemiology of prothrombin G20210A mutation in the mediterranean region Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases 2011 3(1):e201105410.4084/mjhid.2011.05422220251  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Zivelin A, Griffin JH, Xu X, Pabinger I, Samama M, Conard J, A single genetic origin for a common caucasian risk factor for venous thrombosis Blood 1997 89(2):397  [Google Scholar]

[27]Rees DC, Cox M, Clegg JB, World distribution of factor V Leiden Lancet (London, England) 1995 346(8983):1133-34.10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91803-5  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[28]Karimi A, Abolhasani M, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M, Pourgheysari B, A preliminary study of inherited thrombophilic risk factors in different clinical manifestations of venous thromboembolism in central Iran Indian Journal of Medical Research 2015 142(1):46-52.10.4103/0971-5916.16209626261166  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Jun Z J, Ping T, Lei Y, Li L, Ming SY, Jing W, Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in Chinese patients with deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism Clinical & Laboratory Haematology 2006 28(2):111-16.10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00757.x16630215  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Gunathilake KMD, Sirisena UND, Nisansala PKD, Goonasekera HWW, Jayasekara RW, Dissanayake VHW, The prevalence of the prothrombin (F2) 20210G>A mutation in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with thromboembolic disorders Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion 2015 31(3):356-61.10.1007/s12288-014-0452-726085721  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Dentali F, Ageno W, Bozzato S, Malato A, Gianni M, Squizzato A, Role of factor V Leiden or G20210A prothrombin mutation in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis of the literature Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2012 10(4):732-37.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04656.x22329698  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Jusić-Karić A, Terzić R, Jerkić Z, Avdić A, Pod–anin M, Frequency and association of 1691 (G>A) FVL, 20210 (G>A) PT and 677 (C>T) MTHFR with deep vein thrombosis in the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2016 19(1):43-50.10.1515/bjmg-2016-000627785407  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Satoshi O, Hideo W, Yasunori A, Eri Y, Akane S, Junji N, Elevated levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2 indicate high risk of thrombosis Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 2008 14(3):279-85.10.1177/107602960730917618160575  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Fowkes FJI, Price JF, Fowkes FGR, Incidence of diagnosed deep vein thrombosis in the general population: Systematic review European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2003 25(1):01-05.10.1053/ejvs.2002.1778  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[35]Engbers MJ, Van Hylckama Vlieg A, Rosendaal FR, Venous thrombosis in the elderly: incidence, risk factors and risk groups Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010 8(10):2105-12.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03986.x20629943  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[36]Lidegaard Ø, Edström B, Kreiner S, Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: a five-year national case-control study Contraception. Elsevier BV 2002 65(3):187-96.10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00307-9  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[37]Thijs W, Rabe KF, Rosendaal FR, Middeldorp S, Predominance of left-sided deep vein thrombosis and body weight Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2010 8(9):2083-84.10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03967.x20586917  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[38]Narayan A, Eng J, Carmi L, McGrane S, Ahmed M, Sharrett AR, Iliac vein compression as risk factor for left-versus right-sided deep venous thrombosis: case-control study Radiology 2012 265(3):949-57.10.1148/radiol.1211158023175547  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[39]Cogo A, Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Hirsh J, Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound Arch Intern Med 1993 153(24):2777-80.10.1001/archinte.1993.004102400850108257253  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]