JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Biochemistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/35447.11919
Year : 2018 | Month : Aug | Volume : 12 | Issue : 08 Full Version Page : BC19 - BC21

Serum 25-hydroxy Vitamin D levels as an Indicator of Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis

P Modagan1, Santhi Silambanan2, Gopinath Menon3, P Arunalatha4

1 Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
4 Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. P Modagan, Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: pmodagan@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a silent disease; the complications of disease are, an increased risk of fractures resulting in major health and economic impact. The 25-hydroxy vitamin D {25(OH) vitamin D} deficiency linked with osteoporosis and has been related to the low Bone Mineral Density (BMD).

Aim

The aim was to evaluate the 25(OH) vitamin D status and BMD in osteoporosis and to compare the status of vitamin D and BMD in osteoporosis group with normal control and osteopenia group.

Materials and Methods

A total of 90 subjects in the age group between 30 to 90 years of both sexes were included in the study. They were grouped into three, based on DEXA T-score of BMD as Group I -Normal bone mass, Group II-Osteopenia and Group III-Osteoporosis. The anthropometric data were measured and biochemical parameters were analysed for calcium, phosphorus and 25 (OH) vitamin D. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical interpretation.

Results

Statistical significant difference was observed in BMD at neck of femur (p<0.001), BMD at lumbar spine (p<0.001), 25(OH) vitamin D (p=0.009) and calcium (p=0.003) when compared between the three groups. In this study the 25(OH) vitamin D deficiency was higher in osteoporosis 19(63.3%) and the insufficiency was higher in osteopenia 13(43.3%) compared with other groups.

Conclusion

Decreased BMD performs a central role in the development of osteoporosis. The 25 (OH) vitamin D deficiencies may suggest the interrelation between bone remodeling disturbances in osteoporosis. The study shows that the 25(OH) vitamin D concentrations indicate the bone mineral status and thus the extent of the disease.

Keywords

Introduction

Osteoporosis has probably existed throughout human history but only recently it has become a major clinical problem due to lifestyle modification and dietary habits [1,2]. In the early 19th century, Sir Astley Cooper, an English surgeon, noted that bones acquire “the lightness and softness during the advanced stages of life” [3]. In western countries, women suffering from osteoporosis are more than men, probably due to the effect of menopause [2]. But in Indians the occurrence of osteoporosis in men is higher than in women. This is probably due to the likelihood of men seeking hospital attention and lack of awareness in postmenopausal alterations among women [4]. Apart from financial costs, fracture often affects mobility, leading to loss of confidence, quality of life and increasing the risk of premature death [5,6].

The major factors contributing to the deficiency of Vitamin D are inadequate dietary consumption, decreased synthesis from the skin, interference in the pathway of active vitamin D production and mutation in the receptor leading to poor bone health [7,8]. The serum 25 (OH) vitamin D status were categorised as deficient- <20 ng/mL, insufficient- 20 to 30 ng/mL, sufficient- >30 ng/mL and Toxic- >100 ng/mL [9]. The BMD by DEXA [10] determination is the advanced technology used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. A very low BMD is considered as possible element for fracture but it is also useful in identifying those people with high risk of fractures. The WHO criteria for screening of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women based on DEXA T-score of BMD, “as normal bone mass=above -1 SD, osteopenia=between -1 and -2.5 SD and Osteoporosis=below -2.5 SD” [11,12]. The main aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of vitamin D in identifying the stratification of the disease as well as stage of BMD in both sexes.

Materials and Methods

The case control study was carried out in the Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute during the period of August 2016 to September 2017. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.

Study Participants

The individuals attending orthopaedics, endocrinology, geriatrics OPD and master health check-up programme who were referred further for BMD measurements to the DEXA scan were enrolled in the study.

Study Design

[Table/Fig-1] shows the schematic representation of study design and sample distribution. The suspected patients and controls voluntarily participated for BMD measurement of lumbar spine and neck of femur bone by DEXA scan. The total number of study participants (n=90) were categorised according to the DEXA T score of BMD. They were grouped as group I-Normal bone mass (n=30), group-II Osteopenia (n=30) and group-III Osteoporosis (n=30). The blood samples were subsequently collected and analysed for biochemical parameters.

Study design and sample distribution.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with malignancy, stroke, hemi/paraplegia, chronic kidney and liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, hyperparathyroidism, thyroid disease, chronic smokers, cases of organ transplantation and bed ridden patients, patients on drugs-steroids, Immunosuppressive therapy, antiepileptic’s, bisphosphonates, vitamin-D, calcitonin and teriparatide.

Detailed history of demography, diet, exercise, smoking, menstrual history, medication and history of previous fractures and family history of bone disease were taken.

BMD Measurement

The BMD was determined at the neck of femur (left hip) and lumbar spine (L1-L4) by DEXA densitometer (GE Lunar Prodigy., Advance Bone Densitometer., US). BMD values were expressed as the amount of bone mineral content per cm2 area. The T-score was determined based on WHO definition of osteoporosis and osteopenia for Caucasian women: Normal=T-score at or above -1.0 SD; Osteopenia=-1.0 to -2.5 SD; Osteoporosis=T- score at or below -2.5 SD.

Anthropometric Characteristics: Body Mass Index (BMI), Weight in kg, Height in m2 and waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference in cm, hip circumference in cm was determined according to the standard procedure.

Biochemical Analysis: The venous blood (5mL) was collected after overnight fasting. The serum was separated and analysed for the biochemical parameters-25(OH) vitamin D by chemiluminescence microparticle enhanced immunoassay (CMIA) method (Unicel DXI 600., Access Immuno Assay system., BECKMAN COULTER., US) and the CRP by particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) method, calcium by O-Cresolphthalein complexone method, phosphorus by Fiske and Subbarow method and ALP by pNPP-AMP method (AU680., Chemistry system BECKMAN COULTER., US).

Statistical Analysis

The obtained data were analysed by one way ANOVA using SPSS software, version 20 (IBM SPSS Statistics, 20., US). The p-value <0.05 is considered significant.

Results

The characteristics (anthropometric, biochemical and DEXA findings) of group I, II and III are shown in [Table/Fig-2]. The mean age of group-I, group-II and group-III participant were 59, 55 and 56 years respectively. In the anthropometric data, the BMI of Group-II (osteopenia) was highest with mean value (26.8±5.2) compared with group-I (24.2±3.6) and group-III (23.5±4.9) and the BMI demonstrated a statistically significant (p=0.013) difference among the three groups. There was not much difference in waist hip ratio in group-I (1.01±0.04), group-II (1.04±0.06) and group-III (1.0±0.06). The serum calcium (p=0.003) and 25(OH) vitamin D (p=0.009) levels were statistically significant when compared between the three groups. There was no statistical significance difference observed in CRP, ALP and phosphorous. The mean level of BMD, T-score of neck of femur and lumbar spine showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) between the groups.

Shows the mean, SD and significance levels of anthropometric, biochemical and DEXA findings compared among the three groups and one-way ANOVA is used to identify the p-value.

CharacteristicsGroup I (N=30)Mean±SDGroup II (N=30)Mean±SDGroup III (N=30)Mean±SDp-value
Age (Years)59±1055±1156±90.190
BMI(kg/m2)24.2±3.626.8±5.223.5±4.90.013*
WHR1.01±0.041.04±0.061.0±0.060.085
CRP (mg/dL)0.4±0.50.39±0.630.57±0.30.304
ALP (U/L)95.7±18.990.6±29.8100.1±38.60.477
Calcium (mg/dL)9.5±0.39.2±0.339.03±0.50.003*
Phosphorus (mg/dL)4.1±0.23.8±0.273.7±0.40.079
Vit. D (25OH) (ng/mL)23.5±6.621.9±8.917.3±8.10.009*
NF-BMD(g/cm2)1.07±0.10.87±0.090.82±0.06<0.001*
NF-BMD T score+0.07±0.8-1.3±0.6-2.7±0.5<0.001*
LS-BMD (g/cm2)1.27±1.11.07±0.10.82±0.07<0.001*
LS-BMD T score+0.6±0.8-1.0±1.1-2.9±0.32<0.001*

The p<0.05 was significant*

BMI: Body mass index; WHR: Waist to hip ratio, CRP: C reactive protein; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; Vit.D: Vitamin D; NF-BMD: Neck of femur bone mineral density; LS-BMD: Lumbar spine bone mineral density


In our study population females had high prevalence of osteoporosis i.e., 18(60%) and male to female ratio was 0.7:1. In osteopenia the prevalence rate was increased in males 17(56.7%) and male to female ratio was 1.3:1 as presented in [Table/Fig-3].

Shows the distribution of male and female among the three groups.

CategoryMalen (%)Femalen (%)M/F ratio
Group-I19 (63.3)11 (36.7)1.7:1
Group-II17 (56.7)13 (43.3)1.3:1
Group-III12 (40)18 (60)0.7:1

[Table/Fig-4] summarises the 25(OH) vitamin D status in normal bone mass, osteopenia and osteoporosis group. The percentage of 25(OH) vitamin D deficiency was found to be higher 19(63.3%) in osteoporosis group. While the percentage of insufficiency rate 13(43.3%) was higher in osteopenia.

Shows the 25(OH) vitamin D status among the three groups.

25(OH) Vitamin D StatusGroup-In (%)Group-IIn (%)Group-IIIn (%)
Sufficiency (30-100ng/mL)13 (43.3)6 (20)2 (6.7)
Insufficiency(20-30ng/mL)12 (40)13 (43.3)9 (30)
Deficiency (<20ng/mL)5 (16.7)11 (36.7)19 (63.3)

Discussion

This study focuses mainly on comparison of BMD with 25(OH) vitamin D status in male as well as female adult population with osteoporosis. We found that the 25(OH) vitamin D deficiency rate was higher in osteoporosis 19(63.3%) when compared with the other groups.

In a previous study it was observed that the maximum bone mass was obtained at the age of 30 years beyond which the bone demineralization rate is increased [6]. In contrast to the above study, in our study population maximum bone mass was observed at the age of 36 years.

Vitamin D and calcium are essential to maintain BMD and good bone health [13,14]. The established reports indicate that severe deficiency of vitamin D reduces the absorption of calcium which leads to low bone mass [15]. We found that low baseline levels of serum calcium (9.03 mg/dL±0.5) and 25(OH) vitamin D (17.3 ng/mL±8.1) were potentially associated with very low BMD (NF = 0.82±0.06, LS = 0.82±0.07) in osteoporosis. In osteopenia group we observed that mean levels of serum calcium (9.2 mg/dL±0.33) and 25(OH) vitamin D (21.9 ng/mL±8.9) levels were significantly associated with low BMD (NF = 0.87±0.09, LS = 1.07±0.1). Sahota O et al., reported that calcium and vitamin D supplementation reduces the age related bone loss, improves the good bone health and prevents the risk of fractures [16]. In our study findings it was reported that calcium and vitamin D deficiency decreases the BMD. Therefore, our study gives an additional support to the report of Sahota O. There was no significant association in serum phosphorus levels between the groups. The ALP and CRP mean levels are slightly elevated in osteoporosis than other groups but there is no statistical significant difference.

Various epidemiological studies [17-19] have reported vitamin D deficiency in post-menopausal women, female population and elderly people [20]. Hence, our study focuses the relation of BMD with vitamin D in the male population as well.

Deng W-M et al., reported that insufficiency of vitamin D is common in postmenopausal women but no one has to monitor the insufficiency level, which is the major health problem in women [9]. Gill TK et al., has found that the prevalence of Vitamin D (25OH) deficiency in women was 26.8% and in men it was 18.5% [20]. According to our study, the 25 (OH) vitamin D insufficiencies in osteopenia were found to be higher 13(43.3%) and the deficiency was higher in osteoporosis group 19(63.3%).

Bandeira F et al., reported that vitamin D (25 OH) deficiency was associated with lower BMD at neck of femur [21]. Labronici PJ et al., found that 91.1% of patients (osteopenia) have low BMD associated with least vitamin D levels and 19(62.5%) of patients with osteoporosis have low BMD associated with vitamin D deficiency [11]. In concordance with above studies the low BMD and 25 (OH) vitamin D insufficiencies is highly associated in osteopenia. The deficiency of 25(OH) vitamin D was found to be higher in osteoporosis.

The findings of our study reveal that BMI was higher in osteopenia group (26.8±5.2) when compared with the other two groups, whereas group III (23.5±4.9) showed least BMI.

Limitation

The vitamin D and BMD assessment were done on a single visit and follow up of the patients who are on treatment was not carried out.

Conclusion

Decreased BMD is the principal factor in the development of osteoporosis. The serum calcium and vitamin D may suggest their link with bone remodelling process. Any alteration in these two may affect bone remodelling in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Hence monitoring the insufficiency of 25(OH) vitamin D would provide a better insight into the progression of disease. The 25 (OH) vitamin D status suggest the stage of BMD. Therefore, routine screening of vitamin D deficiency along with the insufficiency may be helpful in identifying the osteoporosis at an earlier stage.

The p<0.05 was significant*BMI: Body mass index; WHR: Waist to hip ratio, CRP: C reactive protein; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; Vit.D: Vitamin D; NF-BMD: Neck of femur bone mineral density; LS-BMD: Lumbar spine bone mineral density

References

[1]Mithal A, Wahl DA, Bonjour JP, Burckhardt P, Dawson-Hughes B, Eisman JA, Global vitamin D status and determinants of hypovitaminosis D Osteoporos Int 2009 20(11):1807-20.10.1007/s00198-009-0954-619543765  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Shetty S, Kapoor N, Naik DB, Ghatta H, Asha S, Prabu S, +Osteoporosis in healthy south Indian males and the influence of life style factors and vitamin d status on bone mineral density Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Osteoporosis 2014 2014:723-38.10.1155/2014/72323825478284  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Raisz LG, Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts and prospects J Clin Invest 2005 115:3318-25.10.1172/JCI2707116322775  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Kadam N, Chiplonkar S, Khadilkar A, Khadilkar V, Prevalence of osteoporosis in apparently healthy adults above 40 years of age in Pune City, India Indian J Endocr Metab 2018 22:67-73.10.4103/ijem.IJEM_438_1729535940  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Tandon V, Gillani Z, Khajuria V, Mahajan S, Mahajan A, Raina K, Prevalence of vitamin d deficiency among Indian menopausal women and its correlation with diabetes: A first Indian cross sectional data Journal of Mid-life Health 2014 5(3):12110.4103/0976-7800.14118825316997  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Malhotra N, Mithal A, Osteoporosis in Indians Indian J Med Res 2008 127(3):263-68.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Alkhenizan A, Mahmoud A, Hussain A, Gabr A, Alsoghayer S, Eldali A, The Relationship between 25 (oh) d levels (vitamin d) and bone mineral density (bmd) in a saudi population in a community-Based Setting PLoS One 2017 12(1):1-8.10.1371/journal.pone.016912228046015  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, Zonderman AB, Berg AH, Nalls M, Vitamin D–binding protein and Vitamin D status of Black Americans and White Americans N Engl J Med [Internet] 2013 369(21):1991-2000.Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa130635710.1056/NEJMoa130635724256378  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Deng W-M, Wei Q-S, Tan X, Shao Y, Chen X-H, Sun W-S, Relation of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels to bone mineral density in southern Chinese postmenopausal women: A preliminary study Indian J Med Res [Internet] 2015 142(4):430Available from: http://www.ijmr.org.in/text.asp?2015/142/4/430/16920610.4103/0971-5916.16920626609035  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Mohamed WW, Abas MA, Bone mineral density assessment in pre- and postmenopausal women: comparison between t-scores by heel QUS and DXA in HRPZII Med J Malaysia 2012 (67):487-90.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Labronici PJ, Blunck SS, Lana FR, Esteves BB, Franco JS, Fukuyama JM, Vitamin D and its relation to bone mineral density in postmenopause women. Rev Bras Ortop (English Ed [Internet] Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2013 48(3):228-35.Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S225549711300057810.1016/j.rboe.2012.07.00331214537  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Lee J, Vasikaran S, Current recommendations for laboratory testing and use of bone turnover markers in management of osteoporosis Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2012 32(2):10510.3343/alm.2012.32.2.10522389876  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]van den Bergh JJPW, Bidar SS, Bours S, van Geel TACM, Geusens PPMM, Need of Calcium and Vitamin D in patients after a recent fracture Food Nutr Sci 2012 03:539-47.10.4236/fns.2012.34076  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Bauer DC, Calcium supplements and fracture prevention N Engl J Med [Internet] 2013 369(16):1537-43.Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMcp121038010.1056/NEJMcp121038024131178  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Choi HS, Chung Y-S, Choi YJ, Seo DH, Lim S-K, Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 B.O.N intramuscular injection in Korean adults with vitamin D deficiency Osteoporos Sarcopenia [Internet] 2016 2(4)Elsevier Ltd:228-37.10.1016/j.afos.2016.09.00430775491  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Sahota O, Osteoporosis and the role of vitamin D and calcium-vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D insufficiency and vitamin D sufficiency Age Ageing 2000 29(4):301-04.10.1093/ageing/29.4.30110985437  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Ebeling PR, Vitamin D and bone health: Epidemiologic studies Bonekey Rep [Internet] 2014 3Nature Publishing Group:1-5.10.1038/bonekey.2014.624818003  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Gupta R, Gupta A, Vitamin D deficiency in India: prevalence, causalities and interventions Nutrients 2014 60:729-75.10.3390/nu602072924566435  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]González G, Vitamin D status among healthy postmenopausal women in South America Dermato-Endocrinology 2013 5(1):117-20.10.4161/derm.2480724494044  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Gill TK, Hill CL, Shanahan EM, Taylor AW, Appleton SL, Grant JF, Vitamin D levels in an Australian population BMC Public Health [Internet] 2014 14(1):1001Available from: http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-100110.1186/1471-2458-14-100125256413  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Bandeira F, Griz L, Freese E, Lima DC, Thé AC, Diniz ET, Vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with bone mineral density among postmenopausal women living in the tropics Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2010 54(2):227-32.10.1590/S0004-2730201000020002020485913  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]