JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Biochemistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/35825.11873
Year : 2018 | Month : Aug | Volume : 12 | Issue : 08 Full Version Page : BC05 - BC08

Reliability of Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in Ectopic Pregnancy

Sathya Selvarajan1, Jothimalar Ramalingam2

1 Research Scholar–ICMR MD-(PhD), Departmet of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Jothimalar Ramalingam, Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drjothimalar@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

A fertilized ovum implanting external to the uterine cavity is an Ectopic Pregnancy (EP). It is one of the leading causes of first trimester maternal morbidity and mortality around the globe.

Aim

To assess the clinical manifestation, predisposing factors, beta-hCG values and mode of treatment associated with EP in a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and Methods

Analysis of patients, admitted with EP to Sri Ramachandra Medical College Hospital for one year, was done. All the data was collected from the case records of 116 patients. Charts were reviewed to determine patient symptoms, gestational age, ultrasound findings, beta-hCG assay values and mode of treatment.

Results

Maximum (49.2%) cases belonged to the age group of 26 to 30 years and most of cases (40%) were multiparous. Major risk factor was the usage of assisted reproductive technologies besides having previous bad obstetric histories. Most patients presented with complaints of bleeding per vaginum and/or pain abdomen. Majority of women presented at the 7th week of gestation. There was a weak correlation (0.392) between the weeks of gestation and the beta-hCG values. Major modality of treatment was surgery (56.3%) while the remaining patients were managed medically or conservatively. No mortality was encountered in this series.

Conclusion

Women with risk factors like assisted reproductive technologies and bad obstetric history should be screened for EP in their subsequent pregnancies. There is an overlap of values of beta-hCG obtained in EP with normal pregnancy, especially during the 4th and 5th weeks of gestation. Further studies with an increased sample size, from 6th week of gestation onwards, will throw light on this issue.

Keywords

Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy is a pregnancy where the fertilized ovum is implanted at a site other than the intrauterine cavity [1]. Studies in developing nations have reported mortality rates of about 1% - 3% which is nearly 10 times more than what is seen in developed nations [2].

The incidence of EPs is on the rise during recent times due to various factors like late primiparity, usage of intra-uterine contraceptive devices, smoking, increase in sexually transmitted diseases, use of emergency contraceptive pills like levonorgestrel, tubal sterilization and reversal of the same, previous history of abortions, previous pelvic surgeries and increase in the usage of assisted reproductive technologies [3].

The usual site of implantation of an EP is in the fallopian tube [3]. Implantation in the cervix, ovary or abdomen is seen rarely but is associated with a higher degree of mortality. The fatality of an EP multiplies with the chance of an impending rupture. It can detonate a potentially life-threatening intra-abdominal haemorrhage and impair future fertility. With the advent of high resolution ultrasounds and highly sensitive beta-hCG assays, there is advancement in the diagnosis of EP and the incidence of rupture has declined [4].

A patient with an EP commonly presents with abdominal pain and bleeding per vaginum in the gestational age of 6 to 10 weeks. A transvaginal ultrasound is performed to ascertain the presence and site of the gestational sac. If the ultrasound is inconclusive, a serum beta-human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) is assayed. A low beta-hCG most often indicates a failing/ abnormal pregnancy. Clinicians commonly wait for a window period of 48 hours to look for doubling of beta-hCG values. If the second assay after the window period does not show a sufficient rise in beta-hCG values and gestational sac is not visualized within the uterus in an ultrasound, then the woman is managed as a case of EP [5]. However, this time window required for serial measurement poses the risk of rupture in EP and the cost of performing an additional laboratory test. An early diagnosis thereby avoids unwarranted invasive surgery and facilitates for a conservative management instead [3].

This study was performed to assess the clinical presentation, beta-hCG values, mode of treatment and risk factors in relation to EP.

Materials and Methods

This hospital based observational, cross-sectional study was carried out at Sri Ramachandra Medical College Hospital, Chennai. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai and was performed in accordance with its recommendations. Records of confirmed EP patients admitted to the hospital from January 2014 to December 2014 were included in this study.

Women with normal pregnancy and non-viable intra-uterine pregnancy were excluded from this study. During the one year time frame of this study, a total of 128 EP cases were documented. Due to incomplete data being available in a few case sheets, only 116 cases were included in this study.

Charts were reviewed to determine patient symptoms, detailed history along with relevant laboratory investigations, ultrasound findings and mode of treatment. Beta-hCG was assayed on the Siemens ADVIA Centaur system based on a two-site sandwich immunoassay using direct chemiluminometric technology.

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software for Windows, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

A majority of the patients belonged to the age group of 20-35 years with around 49.2% within 26-30 years of age [Table/Fig-1].

Age group and risk factors of patients.

Age in yearsPercentageNumber of women
15 – 202.33
21 – 2518.822
26 – 3049.257
31 - 3521.925
36 - 407.89
 
Previous history ofPercentage
Assisted Reproductive Technologies20.3
Abortions18
LSCS16.4
Ectopic Pregnancy14.8
Salphingectomy14.8
Sterilization13.3
D&C4.3
PCOS3.9
Contraception3.8
Diabetes Mellitus3.1
Recannulisation3.1
Seizures2.3

LSCS – Lower Segment Cesarean Section, D & C – Dilation And Curettage PCOS – Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome


The distribution of the various risk factors of EP in this study has been listed in [Table/Fig-1]. Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) like Ovulation Induction (OI), Intra Uterine Insemination (IUI), Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) with Invitro Fertilization (IVF) were found to be the major risk factors associated with EP constituting 20.3%. Previous bad obstetric histories like abortions and previous EPs; previous surgeries like cesarean section, sterilization, recannulization and salphingectomy with/without oophorectomy formed the next set of risk factors ranging from 13-18%. Associated PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome) was seen in less than 5% of these patients.

About one third of the patients presenting with EP were primiparous (38.6%) while the remaining patients were multiparous. While a majority of the patients presented with either bleeding per vaginum (61.7%), pain abdomen (18%) or both (14.8%), some patients were identified incidentally to have an extra-uterine growth during their Dating Scan (5.5%). Most commonly, the women presented at 7 weeks of gestation according to ultrasound and Last Menstrual Period (LMP). However, some patients reported as early as 4 weeks and even as late as 11 weeks [Table/Fig-2].

Beta-hCG levels according to weeks of gestation.

Week of gestationNumber of casesBeta hCG Mean (SD) mIU/mL
473429(2254.7)
5112630(2387.3)
6215328.9(6382.3)
7308569.7(13319.7)
82016612.5(27249.6)
9153726.8(3049.2)
10937950.6(37950.6)
1131365.4(1731)

A total of 74.3% of the patients had abdominal tenderness; cervical motion tenderness was seen in 43.7% cases and 47.8 % had adnexal tenderness. Around 36.4% of the patients had performed and found the urinary pregnancy test to be positive while the others had not performed it. A majority of the cases (69.7%) were found between September and December.

The mean Beta-human Chorionic Gonadotropin assayed on day one of presentation is tabulated according to the week of gestation in the following table [Table/Fig-2]. The range of beta-hCG values in EP according to the week of gestation is represented in [Table/Fig-3]. The reference intervals for hCG in normal pregnancy according to the week of gestation are also tabulated in [Table/Fig-3]. The Karl Pearson correlation co-efficient was determined between weeks of gestation and beta-hCG values assayed on day one of admission. There was a weak correlation (0.392) between the weeks of gestation and the beta hCG values [Table/Fig-4].

Range of values of beta-hCG based on gestational age in EP and the reference interval for normal pregnancy.

Week of gestationRange in EP in this study (mIU/mL)Reference interval in normal pregnancy (mIU/mL)
41174.7-6983.5500-10000
532.4-6796.71000-50000
6169.8-2063610000-100000
7113.3-54551.615000-200000
8120.2-94933.410000-100000
9243.5-10333.6
1088.2-122604.5
11342.6-3364

Correlation between weeks of gestation and beta-hCG values.

Ultrasound findings showed a live EP with gestational sac and yolk sac in 15.6% of the cases while only a mass was seen in 62.5%. Mass along with vascularity was noted in 11.7% of the cases, while free fluid was seen in 27.2%. Right-sided tubal ectopic pregnancies were seen in 58.4% of the patients and left side involvement was seen in 42.6%.

The most common mode of treatment was surgery (56.3%), medical treatment with multiple doses of methotrexate and folinic acid was carried out in 35.9% and the remaining 7.8% of cases were managed conservatively with observation for complete extrusion of products of conception spontaneously and supportive treatment for pain. Of the 72 cases that underwent laparotomy, 35.2% cases had a ruptured EP and 64.8% cases were of unruptured EPs; haemoperitoneum was observed in 10.2% of cases during laparotomy.

Unilateral Salpingectomy was the most common surgical management performed in 90.3%; salpingo-oophorectomy was done in 6.5% and salpingostomy in 3.2%. The modality of management according to the weeks of gestation at the time of presentation is tabulated below [Table/Fig-5]. Morbidity included anaemia (18%), blood transfusion in 14.8% and shock at presentation in 2.3% of the cases. No mortality was noted in this study period.

Modality of management according to weeks of gestation.

Weeks of gestationNumber of cases n(%)Medical Rx n(%)Surgical Rx n(%)Conservative Rx n(%)
47(6)-6(85.7)1(14.3)
511(9.5)5(45.5)5(45.5)1(9.1)
621(18.1)12(57.1)8(38.1)1(4.8)
730(25.9)10(33.3)18(60)2(6.7)
820(17.2)8(40)12(60)-
915(12.9)5(33.3)8(53.3)2(13.3)
109(7.8)2(22.2)6(66.7)1(11.1)
113(2.6)2(66.7)-1(33.3)

Discussion

In women presenting with first trimester bleeding, pain abdomen or both, the EP prevalence spans from 6 to 16% [6]. Most patients in this study fit into the age group of 25-30 years. Khaleeque F et al., also reported the same in their study [7]. The rate of EP was found to increase with age by Hoover KW et al., 0.3% in females aged 15-19 years and 1.0% in women aged 35-44 years [8].

In this study, 61.4% were multiparous and 38.6% were primiparous. Multiparous women were more predisposed to EP (61%) in the study conducted by Shraddha Shetty et al., [9]. The risk factors which have been found to be associated with EP seem to possess a common etiological factor: the hindrance of function of the fallopian tube. A compromised tubal ciliary motility or scarring due to previous surgeries or anatomic defects can restrict the fertilized zygote from passing through the fallopian tube into the uterus. This can lead to an implantation at a site prior to the defect, which can be functional or anatomic.

In this study, the most widespread predisposing factors were a history of infertility and assisted reproductive techniques, abortion, previous EPs and previous LSCS. Comparable risk factors were noticed in the study by Gupta R et al., [10]. These patients commonly presented with amenorrhea, pain abdomen and bleeding per vaginum. Abdominal tenderness, cervical motion tenderness and adnexal tenderness were the frequently seen clinical signs. An expedited diagnosis is made possible with the presence of these signs and symptoms.

A transvaginal ultrasound is performed to ascertain the location of the gestational sac. If the ultrasound is inconclusive, serum beta hCG is assayed. Serial measurement of beta-hCG may provide some clarity when the diagnosis is uncertain [11]. But in this study, there was a weak correlation (0.392) between the weeks of gestation and the beta-hCG values [Table/Fig-1]. However, this correlation cannot be interpreted to be statistically significant as: 1) there is a variation in the number of samples in each gestational age; 2) there are not enough samples in each category of gestational age; and 3) the standard deviation is so large. Therefore, beta- hCG may not be a reliable marker and newer biomarkers with better diagnostic capabilities are in need.

As of today, an amalgam of ultrasound and beta hCG is the approach to identify an extra-uterine pregnancy despite the fact that neither one on its own has been established as the gold standard for diagnosis of EP. An ultrasound, be it transvaginal or transabdominal, can recognize only around 20% of extra-uterine pregnancies, while the highly flaunted beta-hCG discriminatory zone gives the most elementary diagnostic assistance. In cases where the initial ultrasound is inconclusive, beta-hCG levels do not provide much direction as the discriminatory zone (the presumed beta-hCG level at which an intra-uterine pregnancy can be identified by an ultrasound) varies widely. It is anywhere between 1000 to 2000 mIU/mL, depending upon the hospital guidelines.

A beta-hCG level lesser than 1,500 mIU/mL is highly suspicious of EP at more than 8 weeks of gestation. However, an EP can occur at any level of β-hCG. This hormone is demonstrable in blood and urine as early as a week prior to an expected menstrual period. Serum levels as low as 2 IU/L can be detected, while urine levels as low as 20–50 IU/L can be detected [5]. While in the 4th week of an EP, the minimum and maximum values of beta-hCG were 1174 mIU/mL and 6983mIU/mL respectively in this study while the normal range for this week is between 500-10000mIU/mL. This wide range in the normal pregnancies itself makes the interpretation of beta-hCG difficult in EPs.

Similarly, the highest beta-hCG value in each category of EP was higher than the lower limit of beta-hCG in normal pregnancy. The number of EP cases with beta-hCG values overlapping the lower limit of normal pregnancy was 7, 6, 2, 4, 6, 1, 3 and 0 in weeks 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 respectively. The percentage of EP cases with beta-hCG values not overlapping with normal pregnancy were 0 %, 45.4%, 90.5%, 86.7%, 70%, 93.3%, 66.7% and 100% in 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 weeks respectively. It appears that a single value of beta-hCG cannot be of much use especially during the 4th and 5th weeks of gestation. This could be due to the wide range of beta-hCG values in normal pregnancy itself. During these early weeks, serial measurement to look for doubling time may be performed. From the 6th week onwards, predicting EP with a single measurement can be relied upon and it requires further validation.

Right-sided tubal EPs were seen in 58.4% of the patients and left side involvement was seen in 42.6%. In the 72 cases that underwent laparotomy, ruptured EP was present in 35.2 % of cases, 64.8% had unruptured EPs and haemoperitoneum was observed in 10.2% of cases. In the study by Latchow G et al., they showed that patients with a previous EP had a significantly higher risk of tubal rupture [12].

Knafel A et al., demonstrated that low haemoglobin and haematocrit values, along with higher gravidity can imply an augmented threat of tubal rupture [13]. In the current study, 61.4% were multiparous and 18% women were anaemic at the time of admission.

Morbidity included anaemia (18%), blood transfusion (14.8%) and shock (2.3%) while no maternal mortality was observed in the present study. By lowering and identifying risk factors and making a timely diagnosis, improvement in prognosis is likely [14].

The fatality of an EP multiplies with the chance of an impending rupture. It can detonate a potentially life-threatening intra-abdominal haemorrhage, cause shock and impair future fertility [15]. It is therefore, of ultimate importance to diagnose it much in advance for resolving the correct modality of treatment [11,16-21]. This can not only minimize the health care cost but also the mental agony of the patient.

Conclusion

Recognition of underlying risk factors, timely diagnosis and appropriate intervention will certainly abet in diminishing the morbidity and mortality related with EP, and can enhance the future reproductive outcome. The reference interval of Beta-hCG is wide in normal pregnancies itself. There is an overlap of beta-hCG values in EP with the lower limit of normal pregnancy especially so for the 4th and 5th week of gestation. Further studies with more number of women from the 6th gestational week onwards will aid in establishing the reliability of a single beta-hCG measurement in EP.

LSCS – Lower Segment Cesarean Section, D & C – Dilation And Curettage PCOS – Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

References

[1]Walker JJ, Ectopic pregnancy Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007 50(1):89-99.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Goyaux N, Leke R, Keita N, Thonneau P, Ectopic pregnancy in African developing countries Acta Obstetriciaet Gynecologica Scandinavica 2003 82(4):305-12.10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00175.x12716313  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Shaw JL, Diamandis EP, Horne AW, Barnhart K, Bourne T, Messinis IE, Ectopic pregnancy Clinical Chemistry 2012 58(9):1278-85.10.1373/clinchem.2012.18416822389311  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Condous G, Van Calster B, Kirk E, Haider Z, Timmerman D, Van Huffel S, Prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007 29(6):680-87.10.1002/uog.401517486691  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Renukesh SM, Rai L, Hebbar S, How important is serum β-hCG in the management of ectopic pregnancy? Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2015 4:360-65.10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20150414  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[6]Murray H, Baakdah H, Bardell T, Tulandi T, Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy CMAJ 2005 173(8):905-12.10.1503/cmaj.05022216217116  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Khaleeque F, Siddiqui RI, Jafarey SN, Ectopic pregnancies: a three year study JPMA 2001 51(7):240-43.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK, Trends in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy in the United States Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010 115(3):495-502.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d0c32820177279  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]ShraddhaShetty K, Anil Shetty K, A clinical study of ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary care hospital of Mangalore, India Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science 2014 4(1):305-09.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Gupta R, Porwal S, Swarnkar M, Sharma N, Maheshwari P, Incidence, trends and risk factors for Ectopic Pregnancies in a tertiary care hospital of Rajasthan JPBMS 2012 16(16):7-10.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Daniel F Brennan, Ectopic Pregnancy-Part I: Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis Academic Emergency Medicine 1995 2(12):1081-89.10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03154.x8597920  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Latchaw G, Takacs P, Gaitan L, Geren S, Burzawa J, Risk factors associated with the rupture of tubal ectopic pregnancy Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2005 60(3):177-80.10.1159/00008803216141721  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Knafel A, Basta P, Skotniczny K, Paweł M, Krzysztof B, Rokita W, Ectopic pregnancy rupture-can it be prevented? Ginekol Pol 2009 80(10):734-39.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Majhi AK, Roy N, Karmakar KS, Banerjee PK, Ectopic pregnancy-an analysis of 180 cases J Indian Medical Association 2007 105(6):308:310:312  [Google Scholar]

[15]Espinosa PM, Alcantar Mendoza MA, Heterotopic pregnancy: Report of a case and review of literature Ginecol Obstet Mex 1997 65:482-86.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Segal S, Mercado R, Rivnay B, Ectopic pregnancy early diagnosis markers Minerva Ginecol 2010 62(1):49-62.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Wong E, Suat SO, Ectopic pregnancy-a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department European Journal of Emergency Medicine 2000 7(3):189-94.10.1097/00063110-200009000-0000511142270  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Kulp JL, Barnhart KT, Ectopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management Women’s Health 2008 4(1):79-87.10.2217/17455057.4.1.7919072453  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Lozeau A-M, Potter B, Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy American Family Physician 2005 72(9):1707-14.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Josie L Tenore, Ectopic pregnancy American Family Physician 2000 61(4):1080-88.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Hebertson RM, Storey ND, Ectopic pregnancy Critical Care Clinics 1991 7(4):899-915.10.1016/S0749-0704(18)30288-4  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]