JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/35658.11860
Year : 2018 | Month : Aug | Volume : 12 | Issue : 08 Full Version Page : DC01 - DC05

Capsular Serotyping and Antimicrobial Drug Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Isolated from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Southern India

Lathamani Kotekani1, Subbannayya Kotigadde2, Bhaskaran Thulicheri Nair3

1 Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, KVG Medical College, Sullia, Karnataka, India.
2 Professor, Department of Microbiology, KVG Medical College, Sullia, Karnataka, India.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kannur Medical College, Kannur, Kerala, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Mrs. Lathamani Kotekani, Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, KVG Medical College, Sullia-574321, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: lathamani2006@rediffmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The rapid spread of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKP) and Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) strains among the clinical isolates of K.pneumoniae is a great deal of concern. The drug resistance and limited treatment options are the major threats. However, the spread of drug resistant strains is through plasmid which may carry virulence determinants such as capsular antigens.

Aim

To know the occurrence of hvKP; to study the occurrence of various capsular serotypes such as K1, K2, K3 and K4 among the isolates of K. pneumoniae using Co-agglutination (Co-A) test; to know the occurrence of beta lactamase genes (bla genes) among the K1, K2, K3 and K4 positive serotypes of K. pneumoniae. The study also tried to assess the reproducibility of Co-A test by comparing the result with PCR.

Materials and Methods

A prospective study was carried with a total of 60 condivutive, non-duplicate isolates of K. pneumoniae recovered from various clinical specimens obtained from both outpatients and inpatients between April to December 2017. To determine the occurrence of hvKP by string test, the identification of various serotypes was done by Co-A test and PCR. The determination of beta lactamase genes such as blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M among the capsular serotypes was done by PCR study.

Results

Rate of typability by Co-A was found to be 13(21.67%), 0(0%), 32(53.33%), 7(11.67%) for K1, K2, K3 and K4, respectively. Eight (13.33%) of them remained untypable. The rate of typability among the K. pneumoniae K1 serotype by Co-A test and PCR remained somewhat similar.

Conclusion

Co-A test is a good method of serotyping and can be used not only for diagnostic purpose but also for epidemiological study.

Keywords

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae, an important pathogen is responsible for both community acquired, and hospital acquired infection in human beings. The cell wall receptors, capsular polysaccharides and endotoxins are the factors that may mediate virulence. Capsular material protects the bacterium from phagocytosis. The capsule is a major virulence factor for Klebsiella, Capsular polysaccharide (K antigen) is the antigen present on their cell surface and there are noticeable differences in virulence between the serotypes. It is known that serotypes K1–K6 are responsible for more invasive diseases [1].

Microorganisms which are distinguished by antigenic differences are known as serotypes. The different serotypes are identified using serotyping [2]. Characterization of serotypes can be done by conventional and molecular methods. In general, conventional method has lower discriminatory power than molecular methods. Most molecular methods require costly equipment, reagents but are fast to perform and have capability of differentiating wide variety of strains [3]. Co-A, a conventional method used to characterize K antigen, differentiates isolates into many serotypes. Antiserum required in the method was raised in rabbit. Though the raising and maintenance of the antiserum, the Co-A method is difficult to handle, laborious and time consuming [4], it is cheap, sensitive, and quick in diagnosis, processed without any requirement of expensive equipments and experts. Antiserum once prepared is very long lasting so this method was opted.

Previous study has shown that virulence determinants of K. pneumoniae infections are due to K1 or K2 capsular serotypes and hypermucoviscous (HMV) phenotypes [5]. Classic K. pneumoniae (cKP) and hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKP) are the two different strains of K. pneumoniae. Classic K. pneumoniae strains are associated with antibacterial resistance and hvKP are mostly responsible for life threatening infections among immunocompetent adults [6]. They are often hypermucoviscous and commonly belong to the capsular serotypes K1 or K2 [7]. The rapid spread of hvKP and MDR strains among the clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae is a great deal of concern.

The spread of drug resistant strains is plasmid mediated and these may also contain virulence determinants to make them an effective pathogen [8]. So, the present study was planned to know the occurrence of hvKP, to understand the incidence of K1, K2, K3 and K4 serotypes of K. pneumoniae and to study the occurrence of beta- lactamase genes among the K1, K2, K3 and K4 positive serotypes of K. pneumoniae.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection: A prospective study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, KVG Medical College and Hospital, Sullia, Karnataka, India. Various consecutive, non-duplicate isolates of K. pneumoniae recovered from clinical specimens such as Urine (n=38), sputum (n=18), pus (n=1), blood (n=1) and others (n=2) obtained from both outpatients and inpatients attending KVG Medical College, Sullia between April to December 2017 were included in the study. The minimum sample size was calculated using the following formula.

Level of significance is 1.96, δ2 = (0.05)2, The estimated prevalence is 6% (ESBL-producers among the serotype K1). So P =0.06

Hence, the minimum sample size was 60

Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated without any clinical disease, suggesting colonization were excluded from the study. Approval from the KVG Medical College Institutional Scientific and Ethics Committee was obtained (IEC/ 01/2016).

Phenotypic Identification: Biochemical characterization of the isolates of Klebsiella collected from various clinical specimens was done by applying standard identification procedures [9].

Co-Agglutination Test [10]:

Preparation of Purified Capsular Polysaccharide (CPS): The reference capsular serotypes of K. pneumoniae procured from MTCC Chandigarh were grown on Luria broth and incubated at 37°C. Further growth of organisms in Luria broth was stopped by adding cetavlon to a final concentration of 0.5% (wt/vol); kept at room temperature by constant stirring for 30 minutes and then centrifuged at 10000 X g for 15 minutes to get precipitate. Equal amount of 1M CaCl2 solution and 25% ethanol was added to the precipitate and stirred well for 60 minutes at room temperature. The precipitated nucleic acid was removed by centrifuging at 10,000 X g for 30 minutes. To the supernatant 80% ethanol was added to get the precipitated CPS. Then the CPS was extracted by treating with an equal volume of chloroform butanol solution in a proportion of 5:1. The water phases were dialyzed against distilled water at 40°C. Lipopolysaccharide was removed by centrifuging the solution at 100,000 X g for 16 hours. The supernatant fluid which contains CPS was collected and analysed for its purity by colorimetric assay.

Antisera Preparation: Rabbits were immunized to get hyper immune sera against purified CPS antigen. Two milliliter (mL) of complete Freund’s adjuvant was added to 2 ml of 0.25 mg/ml purified CPS in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). Mixed well and stored at 4°C. About 0.1 ml of CPS, adjuvant mixture was administered subcutaneously. Subsequent Booster immunizations were done by injecting Incomplete Freund’s adjuvant /antigen emulsion following the same procedure as above. The first booster immunization was administered 4 weeks after the priming immunization. After 10 days blood sample was collected from animal and serum was prepared [11].

(The Ref. capsular strains – Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp.ozaenae (ATCC® 11296™) Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. rhinoscleromatis (ATCC® 13884™) Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (ATCC® 12598™) was procured from MTCC Chandigarh).

Preparation of S. aureus Cowan 1 Strain Reagent: To find out K antigens of K.pneumoniae by Co-A method using S. aureus Cowan 1 strain, the following procedure was used. Culture of S. aureus Cowan 1 strain was washed with PBS, kept at room temperature for three hours, washed with PBS and adjusted the concentration up to 10% with PBS. It was again heated at 80°C for 15 minutes in water bath and washed and adjusted 10% concentration with PBS and stored at 4°C. To 0.025 ml of antiserum 1ml of stored suspension of S. aureus Cowan 1 strain was added and mixed well, allowed to stand for some time and then washed twice with phosphate buffered saline and stored and used for at least for one year of duration [12].

Preparation of Antigen: Overnight cultures of K. pneumoniae (test strains) were added with 2ml saline, mixed and kept at room temperature for one hour. Centrifuged – clear supernatant was used as capsular antigen.

Test Procedure: One drop of S. aureus reagent was mixed with equal volume of antigen. The presence of agglutination suggested capsular antigen [12].

Detection of hvKP: String test was used to detect hvKP strains of K. pneumoniae as per the procedure followed by Fang CT., et al [13]. The appearance of viscous strings of >5 mm in length while a loop was stretched on the colonies of K. pneumoniae, suggested positive string test.

Detection of ESBL Production:

Screening of ESBL production: Disk diffusion test was used to know the resistance to third generation cephalosporins such as cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone as per the CLSI guidelines 2017 [14].

Confirmation of ESBL detection by Double Disc Synergy Test (DDST): An augmentation of zones of Disks containing cephalosporins 30μg (cefotaxime, ceftazidime) by clavulanic acid (10 μg) kept at a distance of 20mm centre-to-centre between cephalosporins and clavulanic acid suggested the possible presence of an ESBL producing serotype [15].

Escherichia coli (ATCC® 25922™) was used as ESBL negative control and Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae (ATCC® 700603™) as positive control.

Detection of K1 and K2 serotypes and ESBL genes by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): Extraction of DNA among K.pneumoniae serotypes were done as per the procedure given by Bora A et al., [16].

Nuclease-free water was included as negative control Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae ATCC® 700603™ was used as a positive control for blaSHV. A previously confirmed K. pneumoniae isolate possessing blaTEM and blaCTX-M genes were used as positive control for blaTEM and blaCTX-M genes. The total concentration of PCR reaction to do single test was 25 μL {PCR ready mix -12.5 μL (Sigma Aldrich, Merck’s Life Science), Forward primer-1μl, Reverse primer-1 μL (Bioserve Hyderabad, India)}.

K1 F (5′-GTAGGTATTGCAAGCCATGC -3′) R (5′-GTAGGTATTGCAAGCCATGC-3′) 1283bp [17] K2 F (5′ – GGAGCCATTTGAATTCGGTG-3′)

R (5′- TCCCTAGCACTGGCTTAAGT-3′) 646bp [17] TEM F (5′ – AAAATTCTTGAAGACG -3′) R (5′- TTACCAATGCTTAATCA -3′) 1080bp [18]

SHV F (5′ – ATTTGTCGCTTCTTTACTCGC-3′) R (5′- TTATGGCGTTACCT TTG ACC-3′) 1018bp [19] CTX-M1 F (5′ – AAAAATCACTGCGCCAGTTC -3′)

R (5′- AGCTTATTCATCGCCACGTT-3′) 445 bp [20], Template DNA- 4 μL and Nuclease free water - 6.5 μL (Hi Media Laboratories Pvt., Ltd., Mumbai, India). Other consumables used: 100 bp DNA ladder (Hi Media Laboratories,), 50x TAE buffer (Hi Media), 6x loading dye solution (Hi Media), Ethidium bromide solution (Sigma Aldrich).

Detection of ESBL genes such as blaTEM,blaSHV and blaCTX-M was done among the capsular serotypes using above mentioned primers and standardized PCR cycling conditions and procedures [Table/Fig-1].

Standardized PCR cycling conditions.

Beta lactamaseInitial denaturationDenaturationAnnealingElongationFinal elongation
K1 antigen950C for 4 min940Cfor 30 sec30 cycles570C for 30 sec30 cycles720C for 30 sec30 cycles720C for five min
K2 antigen940C for 3 min940C for 2 min28 cycles650C for 1min28 cycles720C for 1min28 cycles720C for seven min
bla TEM950C for 2 min950C for 45 sec30 cycles620C for 45 sec30 cycles720C for 60 sec30 cycles720C for five min
bla SHV940C for 2 min940C for 40 sec35 cycles580C for 40 sec35 cycles720C for 60 seconds35 cycles720C for seven min
CTX-M-1940C for 1 min940C for 40 sec35 cycles550C for 40 sec35 cycles720C for 60 seconds35 cycles720C for seven min

All the three genes were detected by uniplex PCR using Thermocycler (Quanta Biotech, 96 S). PCR run conditions were programmed using the supplied software.

Statistical Analysis

Chi-square test was used to compare Co-A and PCR study. Level of significance for this study was 5%. Software used was SPSS version 16.0.

Results

Rate of typability by Co-A was found to be 13(21.67%), 0 (0%), 32(53.33%), 7(11.67%) for K1, K2, K3 and K4, respectively [Table/Fig-2]. The positive and negative Co-A test is showed in [Table/Fig-3]. Eight (13.33%) of them remained untypable. String test [Table/Fig-4] was found positive among 12 out of 60 (20%) of tested isolates of K.pneumoniae. The occurrence of K1, K2, K3 and K4 serotypes among the hvKP strains of K. pneumoniae was 2(16.6%), 0(0%), 1(8.3%), 1(8.3%), respectively [Table/Fig-5]. Among the isolates studied, 20/60 (33.3%) of K. pneumoniae studied were belonging to ESBL producers [Table/Fig-6]. The drug resistance genes harboring among the capsular serotypes, K1, K2, K3 and K4 of K. pneumoniae in respect to SHV gene was 13(65%), 0(0%), 3(15%) and 1(5%) respectively and for CTX-M-1 it was 12(60%), 0(0%), 5 (25%) and 0 (0%), respectively [Table/Fig-7]. The rate of typability among the serotypes of K. pneumoniae K1 serotype by Co-A was 13(21.6%) and 14(23.3%) by PCR [Table/Fig-8]. It was found to be 0% in case of K2 serotype both by Co-A and PCR. The occurrence of SHV and CTX genes among the K1 serotype in the present study was found to be 65% [Table/Fig-9] and 60% [Table/Fig-10] respectively without the presence of TEM.

Rate of typability among the clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae in respect to various capsular serotypes by Co-A method n=60.

SerotypesRate of Typeability by co agglutination n (%)
K113 (21.67)
K20
K332 (53.33)
K47 (11.67)

Showing positive and negative Co-A test.

Showing positive string test.

Showing hvKP strains of K. pneumoniae harboring K1, K2, K3 and K4 antigens n=12.

SerotypesNo. of hvKP strains n (%)
K12 (16.6)
K20
K31 (8.3)
K41(8.3)

Results of screening and confirmatory test of ESBL production among 60 isolates of K. pneumonia.

Screening test positive n (%)ESBL Positive n (%)
39 (65)20(33.3)

Showing drug resistance genes among the capsular serotypes of K. pneumoniae (n=20).

SerotypesTEMSHV n (%)CTX-M-1 n (%)
K1013 (65)12 (60)
K2000
K303 (15)5 (25)
K401 (5)0

Comparison of serotypes isolated among the isolates of K. pneumoniae by Co-A and PCR n=60.

SerotypesRate of Type ability by Co-agglutination n (%)Rate of Type ability by PCR n (%)
K113 (21.6)14(23.3)
K20 (%)0 (0%)

Serotypes Rate of Type ability by Co-A n (%) Rate of Type ability by PCR n (%)


Gel Doc picture showing PCR amplified product of bla SHV. Lane M – 1 Kb DNA ladder, Lane 4-6 bla SHV positive amplicons (1018 bp), Lane 1-3- Isolates of K. pneumoniae without bla SHV, Lane P-Positive control.

Gel Doc picture showing PCR amplified product of blaCTX-M-1. Lane M – 1 Kb DNA ladder, Lane 1-3 blaCTX-M-1 positive amplicons (445bp), Lane P-Positive control.

Discussion

The present study tried to verify the incompatibility between Co-A method and the PCR method in the identification of the capsular serotypes of K. pneumoniae. Apart from diagnostic value, serotyping has epidemiologic value in differentiating strains within species.

Though PCR diagnosis is highly sensitive and specific, widely used, even detects non-viable organisms, faster, could be performed and interpreted by other than taxonomical expertise, it faces risk of amplicon contamination, unable to detect closely related serotypes, requirement of gel electrophoresis, and the use of health hazardous reagents such as ethidium bromide [21,22].

Although, genotypic methods have higher discriminatory power than phenotypic methods, the PCR technique is expensive and its sensitivity can be restrained by contaminants of DNA extraction solution, concentration of the PCR mixtures, annealing temperature and PCR cycling conditions [23,24].

In this study, the total typable rate was about 86.67% and K1 and K2 serotypes accounted for 21.67% and 0% respectively. Whereas some other study reported that the rate of typability among the isolates of K. pneumoniae was about 77% and K1, K2 serotypes accounted for 21.7% and 9.3% of the tested isolates respectively [25]. The rate of typability in another research was 87.7%. Serotypes K1 and K2 were found to be predominant, accounting for 46.6%, and 20.5%, respectively [26]. At the same time study conducted in Taiwan suggested the occurrence of 18.2% K1 serotype and 16.4% K2 serotype among the isolates of K. pneumoniae [27]. In the present study the rate of typability in both Co-A test and PCR was somewhat similar (Co-A- 21.6% and PCR- 23.3%). Study conducted by Maria EN et al., suggested that, slide agglutination serotyping method showed a better agreement with the PCR results [28]. Another study by LaClaire LL et al., showed an overall 94% agreement between slide agglutination serotyping method and PCR results [29].

The result of string test performed in the present study showed that, out of 60 isolates of K. pneumoniae tested for the occurrence of hvKP strains, only 12 (20%) were showing the positive result. It suggests that most of the isolates studied did not belong to hvKP strains. A study from China showed varied prevalence rate of hvKP among the isolates of K. pneumoniae in different cities. It was found highest percentage of 73.9 and the lowest of 8.3% [30]. Study conducted by Liu YM et al., showed that, 26/70 (37.1%) of K. pneumoniae studied were belonging to ESBL producers, 22(31.4%) were hvKPs. Of the 26 ESBL producers, 2 (7.7%) were found to be hvKP strains [31]. In the study of Lee CH et al., hypermucoviscosity was identified in 35 (38.5%) of 91 K. pneumoniae isolates. Twenty four (26.4%) isolates out of 91 were ESBL producing strains. Only one ESBL producing K. pneumoniae strain expressed the hypermucoviscosity [32]. The study conducted by Gharrah MM et al., suggested a negative association between hypermucoviscosity and ESBL production among the isolates of K. pneumoniae. The result of the same study showed that, 62% of non-ESBLs exhibited hypermucoviscosity compared to the ESBLs (4%) [33]. The present study showed, 20/60 (33.3%) of K. pneumoniae studied were belonging to ESBL producers. Of the 60 serotypes, 12(20%) were hvKPs. Out of 20 ESBLs 4 (20%) were hvKPs. The present study showed the occurrence of 2(16.6%) of K1 serotype, 0% of K2 serotype, 1(8.3%) of K3 serotype and 1(8.3%) of K4 serotype among the hvKP isolates studied. But the study conducted by other researcher showed 23.8% of K1 serotype and 42.9% of K2 serotype among the hvKP isolates of K. pneumoniae [34]. At the same time, the study conducted by Qu T et al., also showed high prevalence rate of K1 serotype (68.9%) and the occurrence of K2 serotype (20%). The study also showed that all the hvKP strains belonged to K1/K2 serotype [35]. In another study, the occurrence of K1, K2 and non K1/K2 serotypes ranged from 47-81%, 20% and 23-33% respectively [36]. Study conducted by Cheong HS et al., suggested that, of the 120 K. pneumoniae isolates, 20 (16.7%) were found to produce ESBLs and among the ESBL-producers, only three were proved to be serotype K1 [37]. Whereas our study showed, out of 60 isolates studied, 39 (65%) isolates were showing the resistance to third generation cephalosporin and out of 39 screened resistant isolates, 20(51.28%) was proved to produce ESBLs and among the ESBL producing K. pneumoniae isolates, 9 (45%) isolates were proved to be K1 serotype.

In the present study, the occurrence of SHV and CTX genes among the K1 serotype was found to be 65% and 60% respectively. None of the capsular serotypes studied were showing the genes coding for blaTEM. But the study conducted by Zang Y et al., suggested that, the isolated serotypes were mostly belonging to K1 serotype and it was found to harbor blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M genes [30]. Hence the study well established that capsular serotypes are not only responsible for virulence but also for drug resistance.

Limitation

Co-A and PCR study of serotypes other than K1, K2, K3 and K4 would have added more significance to the study.

Conclusion

Co-A test is a good method of serotyping as it is cheap, sensitive, and quick in diagnosis, processed without any requirement of expensive equipments and experts to handle the test. So, the test can be used not only for diagnostic purpose but also for epidemiological study. The highest number of hvKP strains among the tested isolates was harboring K1 serotype. Most of the K1 capsular serotypes of tested K. pneumoniae strains were exhibiting the genes coding for both SHV and CTX genes. The study suggested that hvKP strains are not only responsible for virulence but also for drug resistance.

Serotypes Rate of Type ability by Co-A n (%) Rate of Type ability by PCR n (%)

References

[1]Turton JF, Baklan H, Siu LK, Kaufmann ME, Pitt TL, Evaluation of a multiplex PCR for detection of serotypes K1, K2 and K5 in Klebsiella sp. and comparison of isolates within these serotypes FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008 284(2):247-52.10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01208.x18507682  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Sikarwar AS, Omas anggar R, A review on advanced serotyping methods for Identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular serotypes Indian J Med Res Pharm Sci 2014 1(7):27-33.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Singh A, Goering RV, Simjee S, Foley SL, Zervos MJ, Application of molecular techniques to the study of hospital infection Clin Microbiol Rev 2006 19(3):512-30.10.1128/CMR.00025-0516847083  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[4]Liu Z, Zheng H, Gottschalk M, Bai X, Lan R, Ji S, Development of multiplex PCR assays for the identification of the 33 serotypes of Streptococcus suis PLoS One 2013 8(8):e7207010.1371/journal.pone.007207023951285  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Wiskur BJ, Hunt JJ, Callegan MC, Hypermucoviscosity as a virulence factor in experimental Klebsiella Pneumoniae endophthalmitis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008 49(11):4931-38.10.1167/iovs.08-227618586871  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Li W, Sun G, Yu Y, Li N, Chen M, Jin R, Increasing occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant hypervirulent (Hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in China Clin Infect Dis 2014 58(2):225-32.10.1093/cid/cit67524099919  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Surgers L, Boyd A, Girard PM, Arlet G, Decré D, ESBL-producing strain of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae K2, France Emerg Infect Dis 2016 22(9):1687-88.10.3201/eid2209.16068127532217  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Hennequin C, Robin F, Correlation between antimicrobial resistance and virulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016 35(3):333-41.10.1007/s10096-015-2559-726718943  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld SA, Bailey & Scott’s diagnostic Microbiology 2002 11th edMosby Inc  [Google Scholar]

[10]Sikarwar AS, Batra HV, Identification of Klebsiella Pneumoniae by capsular polysaccharide polyclonal antibodies Int J Chem Eng Appl 2011 2(2):130-34.10.7763/IJCEA.2011.V2.89  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Cooper HM, Paterson Y, Production of antibodies. In: Coligan JE, Kruisbeek AM, Margulies DH, Shevach EM, Strober W, editors Current protocols in immunology 1995 New YorkJohn Wiley and Sons:2.4.1-2.4.9.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Onokodi JK, Wauters G, Capsular typing of Klebsiellae by co-agglutination and latex agglutination J Clin Microbiol 1981 13(4):609-12.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Fang CT, Chuang YP, Shun CT, Chang SC, Wang JT, A novel virulence gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing primary liver abscess and septic metastatic complications J Exp Med 2004 199(5):697-705.10.1084/jem.2003085714993253  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th ed. CLSI supplement M100 (ISBN 1-56238-804-5 [Print]; ISBN 1-56238-805-3 [Electronic]). Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087 USA, 2017  [Google Scholar]

[15]The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. EUCAST guidelines for detection of resistance mechanisms and specific resistances of clinical and/or epidemiological importance. Version 1.0, 2013  [Google Scholar]

[16]Bora A, Hazarika NK, Shukla SK, Prasad KN, Sarma JB, Ahmed G, Prevalence of bla TEM, bla SHV and bla CTX-M genes in clinical isolates of E.coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from North East India Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2014 57(2):249-54.10.4103/0377-4929.13469824943758  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Sun Y, Wu H, Shen D, Detection and analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae causing liver abscess Research & Reviews: Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2015 4:39-46.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Sharma J, Sharma M, Ray P, Detection of TEM & SHV genes in Escherichia coli & Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolates in a tertiary care hospital from India Indian J Med Res 2010 132:332-36.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Jemima SA, Varghese S, Multiplex PCR for bla CTX-M & bla SHV in the extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram-negative isolates Indian J Med Res 2008 128(3):313-17.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Woodford N, Fagan EJ, Ellington MJ, Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamases J Antimicrob Chemother 2006 57(1):154-55.10.1093/jac/dki41216284100  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Satzke C, Turner P, Julkunen AV, Adrian PV, Antonio M, Hare KM, Standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Updated recommendations from the World Health Organization Pneumococcal Carriage Working Vaccine 2013 32(1):165-79.10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.06224331112  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Weile J, Knabbe C, Current applications and future trends of molecular diagnostics in clinical bacteriology Anal Bioanal Chem 2009 394(3):731-42.10.1007/s00216-009-2779-819377839  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Arabestani MR, Mousavi SM, Nasaj M, Genotyping of clinical streptococcus agalactiae strains based on molecular serotype of capsular (cps) gene cluster sequences using polymerase chain reaction Arch Clin Infect Dis 2017 12:e3678710.5812/archcid.36787  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Adzitey F, Huda N, Ali GR, Molecular techniques for detecting and typing of bacteria, advantages and application to food borne pathogens isolated from ducks Biotech 2013 3(2):97-107.10.1007/s13205-012-0074-428324565   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Fung CP, Hu BS, Chang FY, Lee SC, Kuo BIT, Ho M, A 5-Year Study of the seroepidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae: high prevalence of capsular serotype K1 in Taiwan and implication for vaccine efficacy J Infec Dis 2000 181:2075-79.10.1086/31548810837197  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Yeh KM, Kurup A, Siu LK, Koh YL, Fung CP, Lin JC, Capsular serotype K1 or K2, rather than magA and rmpA, is a major virulence determinant for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess in Singapore and Taiwan J Clin Microbiol 2007 45(2):466-71.10.1128/JCM.01150-0617151209  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Liao CH, Huang YT, Lai CC, Chang CY, Chu FY, Hsu MS, Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia and capsular serotypes, Taiwan Emerg Infect Dis 2011 176:1113-15.10.3201/eid/1706.10081121749784  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Maria EN, Silva B, Silva P, Medeiros MIC, Neme SN, Macedo C, Comparison of two slide agglutination serotyping methods and PCR-based capsule typing for the characterization of Haemophilus influenza serotypes Braz J Microbiol 2006 37(1)10.1590/S1517-83822006000100007  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[29]LaClaire LL, Tondella ML, Beall DS, Noble CA, Raghunathan PL, Rosenstein NE, Popovic T, Identification of Haemophilus influenzae serotypes by standard slide agglutination serotyping and PCR-based capsule typing J Clin Microbiol 2003 41(1):393-6.10.1128/JCM.41.1.393-396.200312517878  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Zhang Y, Zhao C, Wang Q, Wang X, Chen H, Li H, High prevalence of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in China: Geographic distribution, clinical characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016 60(10):6115-20.10.1128/AAC.01127-1627480857  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Liu YM, Li BB, Zhang YY, Zhang W, Shen H, Li H, Clinical and molecular characteristics of emerging hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in mainland China Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014 58(9):5379-85.10.1128/AAC.02523-1424982067  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Lee CH, Liu JW, Su LH, Chien CC, Li CC, Yang KD, Hypermucoviscosity associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae-mediated invasive syndrome: a prospective cross-sectional study in Taiwan Int J Infect Dis 2010 14(8):688-92.10.1016/j.ijid.2010.01.00720547084  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Gharrah MM, Mostafa El-Mahdy A, Barwa RF, Association between virulence factors and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to nonproducing isolates Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2017 2017:1-14.10.1155/2017/727983028684959  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Guo Y, Wang S, Zhan L, Jin Y, Duan J, Hao Z, Microbiological and clinical characteristics of hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates associated with invasive infections in China Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017 7:2410.3389/fcimb.2017.0002428203549  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[35]Qu T, Zhou J, Jiang Y, Shi K, Li B, Shen P, Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess in East China BMC Infect Dis 2015 15:16110.1186/s12879-015-0899-725886859  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[36]Shon AS, Bajwa RPS, Russo TA, Hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae a new and dangerous breed Virulence 2013 4(2):107-18.10.4161/viru.2271823302790  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[37]Cheong HS, Chung DR, Lee C, Kim SH, Kang CI, Peck KR, Emergence of serotype K1 Klebsiella pneumoniae ST23 strains co-producing the plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase DHA-1 and an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in Korea Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016 5:5010.1186/s13756-016-0151-227933141  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]