JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/36868.11810
Year : 2018 | Month : Jul | Volume : 12 | Issue : 7 Full Version Page : OC13 - OC15

Ophthalmic Manifestation of Sickle Cell Patients in Eastern India

Swati Samant1, Srikant Kumar Dhar2, Mahesh Chandra Sahu3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Directorate of Medical Research, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha “O” Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Srikant Kumar Dhar, 3/1, Annapurna Residensy, Mahatab Road, Old Town, Bhubaneswar-751002, Odisha, India.
E-mail: drskdhar@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is the most common and a serious form of an inherited blood disorder that leads to increased risk of early mortality and morbidity. Some of the ophthalmological complications of SCD include retinal changes, vitreous haemorrhage, and abnormalities of the conjunctiva. Irrecoverable Vision loss may be a manifestation if not diagnosed early and treated appropriately.

Aim

To determine different ophthalmic manifestations in SCD patients and correlate in relation to HbS window.

Materials and Methods

A total of 49 cases of sickle cell disease (HbSS) that presented to IMS & SUM Hospital were evaluated for ophthalmic manifestations in Ophthalmology OPD with comprehensive eye examination, slit lamp examination, Fundoscopy (Direct and Indirect) and OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography). Demographics and pattern of presentation were recorded in the proforma prepared for the study.

Results

Male:Female ratio was 3:1. About 2/3rd of the patients were below 40 years of age. Examination of posterior segment revealed 5 (10%) of the patients presented with proliferative retinopathy, 15 (30%) with non proliferative retinopathy, 13(26%) with optic disc changes, 7 (14%) with retinal macular changes and 2 (4%) had retinal detachment findings are significantly different at p=0.001 in ANOVA Test. Anterior segment of eye evaluation demonstrated significant (p=0.0001) changes 18 (36%) patients suffered conjunctival vascular changes, Cataract in 8(16%) patients, and hyphema in only 2 (4%) patients. Both anterior and posterior segment manifestations significantly (p=0.0027) increased with progressive increase in HbS window.

Conclusion

Sickle cell patients need periodic ophthalmic examinations to identify treatable lesions amenable to intervention and to prevent blindness. Both anterior and posterior segment manifestations increases with progressive increase in HbS window in HbSS patients.

Keywords

Introduction

SCD is an autosomal recessive disorder of the ß globin gene in which haemoglobin S polymerizes in erythrocytes in deoxygenated conditions causing occlusion of small blood vessels. SCD is highly prevalent in African countries (5-40%) followed by Asian Arabian and Asian countries [1,2]. It is found in many areas of India and in tribal community too, also is prevalent in different parts of Odisha [3-6].

Pain is the hallmark of presentation, patients presenting as painful vaso-oclusive crisis due to occlusion of blood vessel [7]. In the presence of cellular dehydration or oxidative stress, the red blood cells of sickle cell patients is transformed to a sickled shape instead of the normal bi-concave disc. They get stucked in the small vessels leading to ischemia, hypoxia, and subsequent tissue necrosis. The hypoxia leads to more sickling and a cycle becomes vicious [8]. Ophthalmic manifestations are also due to vaso-occlusion. Homozygous Sickle Cell Disease (HbSS) patients have the worst systemic complications while sickle cell C disease (HbSC) and Sickle thal (S-thal) patients have the most severe ocular problems like proliferative retinopathy and resultant vision loss. This is because the blood is more viscous in sickle cell trait and Sickle-thal group as small retinal arterioles occlude more easily [9]. Salmon-patch haemorrhages and black sunburst pigments are observed in pre-proliferative retinal changes. These are due to retinal pigment epithelial layer reaction to choroidal infarction and retinal haemorrhage [10]. Retinal examination may include silvering of peripheral arterioles and intra retinal refractile bodies, and proliferative retinal changes include sea fan like neovascularization, vitreous haemorrhages, and retinal detachments. Other associated manifestations include venous tortuosity, retinal holes, Central retinal artery occlusion, and angioid streaks. Treatment consists of Pan Retina laser Photocoagulation (PRP) or cryotherapy applied to the peripheral areas of retinal ischemia, usually anterior to the sea fans. New vessels formation occurs due to blockage of their feeder vessels. AntiVEGF agents have found to have good response in the treatment of sickle retinopathy. The present study evaluated the pattern of ophthalmic presentation of sickle cell disease (HbSS) patients in a tertiary care medical college in eastern India.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was done in Institute of Medical Science (IMS) & SUM hospital a 700 bedded tertiary care and a medical college catering patients from most districts of Odissa and nearby states too, situated in Bhubaneswar, Odissa, India. This study was done over a period from April 2015 to May 2016. Patients coming to Department of Medicine for evaluation of anemia who were detected or suspected for haemoglobinopathy were advised for Haemoglobin electrophoresis. In this study, 49 patients including 31 males (63%) and 18 females (37%) having HbS window more than 40% (SCD) were considered randomly for inclusion in study group. Patients suffering from diabetes, hypertension, other metabolic diseases were excluded from study and patients with haemoglobin less than 8 mg% were also excluded from the study. All the 49 patients were sent to Department of Ophthalmology, IMS & SUM Hospital for examination and findings were analysed. External eye examination like lid, periorbital area, conjunctiva and sclera, slit lamp examination, Fundoscopy (Direct and if required Indirect Ophthalmoscopy), OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) (If required) were done in all cases. Ethical committee clearance was taken from Institutional Ethical Committee (Ethical approval No EC/IMS/SOA/123/2014). Written consent was also taken from all patients according to protocol. Findings were tabulated and analysed.

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, the software used was SPSS 20 version software. All the documented parameters compared using ANOVA test and p-value <0.05 was considered as statistical significant.

Results

In this prospective study, 49 SCD were screened for different ophthalmic manifestations. Among the 49 sickle cell patients, 13 patients (26%) (includes both male and female) were observed with optic disc changes like dark red intravascular spots [Table/Fig-1] and from them 21-25 age group revealed maximum number of patients (5). Similarly, from investigation like Slit lamp examination, Fundoscopy, 7(14%) patients were found with retinal macular vascular change like dark, small and red dilated capillaries [Table/Fig-1]. Fifteen (30%) presented with Non-proliferative retinal changes like salmon patches, and Angioid streak affecting all age group except the group 51-56 year [Table/Fig-1]. Proliferative retinal changes like Hair pin loop capillaries, Sea fan retinopathy in sickle cell patients were found in total of 5 patients [Table/Fig-1]. Retinal detachment was detected in 2(4%) patients. Eighteen (36%) patients involving all the age group suffered conjunctival vascular changes like comma shaped vascular segments, cork screw shaped or abnormally long, linear dilatations of vessels. Posterior Segment Manifestations findings are significantly different at p=0.001 in ANOVA Test [Table/Fig-1]. With Cataract (opacity in lens) screening, it was revealed that younger age groups were not suffered where as all the older age grouped patients suffered. Total 8 cases (16%) with age between 38 to 56 suffered with cataract, most of cases above 45 years [Table/Fig-2]. Hyphema (blood in anterior segment) an uncommon finding was found in two cases only (4%) affecting the 15-20 age and 31-35 age group only [Table/Fig-2]. Anterior Segment Manifestations findings are significantly different at p=0.0001 in ANOVA test. Patients with optic disc changes were found 11.1% in patients with S-window in range of 40 to 55, 8.33% in 56-70 S-window, 53.8% in 71-85 S-window, 100% in 86-100 S-window. Retinal macular vascular changes were found 0% in patients with HbS window 40-55, 12. 5% in HbS window of 56-70, 23.08% in HbS Window 71-85, 33.33% in HbS Window of 86-100 [Table/Fig-3]. Similarly chronic macular vascular changes was found to be with 0%, 4.17%, 38.46%, 0%, non proliferative retinopathy was found to be 33%, 8.33%, and 53.85%, 100%, conjunctival vascular changes 0%, 0%, 46%, 0%, iris infarct in 11.1%, 37.5%, 46.15%, 66.6%, cataract in 0%, 4.1%, 38.4%, 0% and hyphema in 22.2%, 12.5%, 15.3%, and 33.3% correspondingly in the HbS Window range of 40-55, 56-70, 71-85, 86-100 respectively [Table/Fig-3]. Ophthalmic manifestation in different HbS window are shown in [Table/Fig-4] which significantly increases at p=0.0027 in ANOVA test.

Posterior segment manifestations (According to no. of patients).

Age (years)No of patientsOptic disc changeRetinal macular vascular changesRetinal detachmentNon-proliferative retinal changeProliferative retinal change
15-20711000
21-251052050
26-30841032
31-35500010
36-40922132
41-45411010
46-50300120
51-56300001
Total491372155

Anterior segment manifestations (According to no. of patients).

Age (years)No of patientsConjunctival vascular changesCataractHyphema
15-207301
21-2510200
26-308300
31-355101
36-409310
41-454110
46-503230
51-563330
Total491882

HbS window & Ophthalmic manifestation (according to % age of patients).

S-windowOptic disc changesRetinal macular vascular changesChronic macular vascular changesNon-proliferative retinal changesProliferative retinal changesConjunctival vascular changesIrisinfarctCataractHyphema
40-5511.110033.330011.11022.22
56-708.3312.54.178.330037.54.1712.5
71-8553.8523.0838.4653.8523.0846.1546.1538.4615.38
86-10010033.33010066.67066.67033.33

Ophthalmic manifestation in different HbS window are significantly increases at p=0.0027 in Anova test


HbS window & ophthalmic manifestation.

Y axis denotes Hb S Window (level of Hb S in patient)

X axis denotes Ophthalmic manifestations

Discussion

Sickle cell ophthalmic involvement is not uncommon in India. Features of mild conjunctival involvement to retinal changes of non proliferative and proliferative retinopathy are found in sickle cell anemia which may lead to visual impairment to vision loss too. More number of males presented with ophthalmic involvement in the present study. Age of presentation is middle age, but the trend is now lower, about 60% of cases seen are below 35 years of age. Goldberg MF et al., had observed the mean age for the ocular changes as 28 years [11], while Condon PI et al., had seen maximum changes in 10-20 years [12].

Our study determines non-proliferative retinopathy (NPSCR) (30%) followed by optic disc changes (26%) in posterior segment abnormalities of eye. Condon PI et al., (97.4% in HbSS cases) have observed such changes in various degree in sickle cell anemia and sickle cell HbC disease other than sickle cell trait. Significant changes were observed in major retinal vessels (28.57%). They had noted retinal haemorrhage (2.6%) and tortuosity and dilatations of capillary network with micro-aneurysmal formation and neovascularisation (39.5%) in the Hb-SS cases of his study which was uncommon in our observation [12]. Menaa F et al., describes NPSCR, more commonly observed in SS patients, is manifested by typical alterations depending on the retinal location also the retinal periphery of patients with NPSCR is frequently characterized as bilateral changes [13]. Retinal macular vascular changes seen in 14% cases which was also noted by other studies like Condon PI et al., Weich RB et al., and Asdourian G et al., [12,14,15].

Vision loss is uncommon in patients with HbSS [16]. A study from Ghana showed that vision loss is confined to HbSC patients [17]. Study in children with HbSS showed increased vascular tortuosity. HbSS patients have relatively less vaso-occlusion in the small-caliber vessels of the retina because of their overall lower haematocrit although they have more number of circulating sickled red cells [11]. The occlusions in HbSC disease may be less severe, but with continuous secretion of angiogenic substances by the damaged tissues may lead to chronic ischemia without complete infarction [18]. Most patients require laser photocoagulation to the peripheral ischemic retina to destroy VEGF producing cells and improve retinal oxygenation. Bevacizumab may be used similarly in proliferative diabetic vision loss [19]. In our study, conjunctival vascular changes found maximum 18(36%) in anterior segment abnormalities and less commonly cataract 8(16%) and hyphema 2(4%) cases. Nagpal KC et al., observed conjunctival vascular changes like comma shaped vascular segments, cork screw shaped or abnormally long, linear dilatations of vessels in their study [20]. Al-salem M et al., found comma conjunctival sign was found in 8 out of 54 patients (14. 8%) and tortuous vessels in the anterior segment (conjunctival and episcleral) were found in 1% of cases [16]. Routray K et al., found 90.4% conjunctival vascular changes in an Indian study [21]. Osaffo-Kwaako A et al., observed 46% of conjunctival vascular changes and 2.6% of cataract in their HbSS patient group [17]. Both anterior and posterior segment manifestations significantly (p=0.0027) increased with progressive increase in HbS window. No definite comparative study was found in this context, however in contrary, most of African studies demonstrate ophthalmic manifestation and morbidity are more in HbSC than in HbSS [11,17,22]. This may be explained by the fact that patients of studied geographical area are more with HbF level possibly providing protection for late presentation and also there is no HbSC in this study group [5,6,22].

Limitation

This study has limitations of not including Sickle cell trait and HbSC cases for comparison and also having less number of study population, however larger study-group with comparative analysis is required for better results.

Conclusion

SCD is a disease of increased concern due to repeated vaso-occlusion leading to crisis, hospitalization and no definite cure. Ophthalmic manifestations although not a common presentation is a matter of concern as early diagnosis and appropriate management may prevent visual loss especially in Sickle cell retinopathy. Both anterior and posterior segment manifestations increase with progressive increase in HbS window in HbSS patient’s. Hence Sickle cell haemoglobinopathy patients routinely should be screened for ophthalmic manifestations.

Ophthalmic manifestation in different HbS window are significantly increases at p=0.0027 in Anova test

References

[1]Serjeant G, Ghosh K, Patel J, Sickle cell disease in India: A perspective Indian Journal of Medical Research 2016 143(1):21-24.10.4103/0971-5916.17858226997009  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Piel F, Hay S, Gupta S, Weatherall D, Williams T, Global burden of sickle cell anemia in children under Five, 2010–2050: modeling based on demographics, excess mortality, and interventions PLoS Medicine 2013 10(7):e100148410.1371/journal.pmed.100148423874164  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Colah RB, Mukherjee MB, Martin S, Ghosh K, Sickle cell disease in tribal populations in India Indian J Med Res 2015 141:509-15.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Kar B, Kulozik A, Sir S, Satapathy R, Kulozik M, Serjeant B, Serjeant G, Sickle cell disease in Orissa State, India The Lancet 1986 328(8517):1198-201.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)92205-1  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[5]Balgir RS, Spectrum of haemoglobinopathies in the state of Orissa, India: a ten years cohort study The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2005 53:1021-26.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Dhar SK, Das CK, Samant S, Tudu PK, Samant S, Spectrum of hemoglobinopathies diagnosed by high-performance liquid chromatography in Western Odisha Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research 2017 5(8):26755-62.10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.128  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[7]Nickel RS, Hsu LL, Clinical Manifestations of Sickle Cell Anemia: Infants and Children. In: Costa F., Conran N. (eds) Sickle Cell Anemia 2016 Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-06713-1_9  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[8]Ilesanmi O, Pathological basis of symptoms and crises in sickle cell disorder: implications for counseling and psychotherapy Hematology Reports 2010 2(1):210.4081/hr.2010.e222184515  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Scott A, Ophthalmic manifestations of sickle cell disease Southern Medical Journal 2016 109(9):542-48.10.14423/SMJ.000000000000052527598358  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Cogan DG, Ophthalmic manifestations of systemic vascular disease 1974 Saunders, Philadelphia  [Google Scholar]

[11]Goldberg MF, Retinal neovascularization in sickle cell retinopathy Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1977 83:409-31.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Condon PI, Serjeant GR, Ocular findings in homozygous sickle cell anemia in Jamaica Am J Ophthalmol 1972 73(4):533-43.10.1016/0002-9394(72)90005-0  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Menaa F, Khan B, Uzair B, Menaa A, Sickle cell retinopathy: improving care with a multidisciplinary approach Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2017 10:335-46.10.2147/JMDH.S9063028919773  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Welch RB, Goldberg MF, Sickle-cell hemoglobin and its relation to fundus abnormality Arch Ophthalmol 1966 75(3):353-62.10.1001/archopht.1966.009700503550085903820  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Asdourian G, Nagpal KC, Goldbaum M, Patrianakos D, Goldberg MF, Rabb M, Evolution of the retinal black sunburst in sickling haemoglobinopathies Br J Ophthalmol 1975 59(12):710-16.10.1136/bjo.59.12.7101240768  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Al-salem M, Benign ocular manifestations of sickle cell Anemia in Arabs Indian J Ophthalmol 1991 39:9-11.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Osafo-Kwaako A, Kimani K, Ilako D, Akafo S, Ekem I, Rodrigues O, Ocular manifestations of sickle cell disease at the Korle-bu Hospital, Accra, Ghana Eur J Ophthalmol 2011 21:484-89.10.5301/EJO.2010.597721058274  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]TS O, Pattern of presentation of sickle cell retinopathy in Ibadan Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 2012 03(09)10.4172/2155-9570.1000257  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[19]Avery RL, Pearlman J, Pieramici DJ, Rabena MD, Castellarin AA, Intravitrealbevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy Ophthalmology 2006 113:1695-705.10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.06417011951  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[20]Nagpal KC, Asdourian GK, Goldbaum MH, Raichand M, Goldberg MF, The conjunctival sickling sign, hemoglobin S, and irreversibly sicklederythrocytes Arch Ophthalmol 1977 95:808-11.10.1001/archopht.1977.04450050086008324452  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Rautray K, Ocular manifestations in sickle cell disease-a preventable cause of blindness? IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2015 14(11):11-16.e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861  [Google Scholar]

[22]Kent D, Arya R, Aclimandos W, Bellingham A, Bird A, Screening for ophthalmic manifestations of sickle cell disease in the United Kingdom Eye 1994 8(6):618-22.10.1038/eye.1994.1557532598  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]