JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/33979.11529
Year : 2018 | Month : May | Volume : 12 | Issue : 05 Full Version Page : DD01 - DD02

Isolation of Haemophilus influenzae from Urine of an Elderly Male Patient with Carcinoma Bladder-An Under-recognised Pathogen?

Ramya Raghavan1, Jharna Mandal2, Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan3

1 Junior Resident, Department of Microbiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Additional Professor, Department of Microbiology, JIPMER, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Urology, JIPMER, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Jharna Mandal, Additional Professor, Department of Microbiology, JIPMER, Puducherry-605006, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drjharna@gmail.com
Abstract

Haemophilus species are rare uropathogens. The incidence and significance of Haemophilus species isolated from the genitourinary tract are not well studied. Here we describe the serendipitous isolation of Haemophilus influenzae in an elderly male, with an underlying urothelial carcinoma of bladder, who presented with Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). This case report further strengthens the cause of inclusion of special medium like chocolate agar in the work up of UTI in selected population.

Keywords

Case Report

A 77-year-old man presented to the Urology Outpatient Department with complaints of pain over the right loin with burning micturition, haematuria and terminal dysuria for 10 days. He was previously diagnosed with a high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder wall along with Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) eight years back. He had undergone transurethral resection of prostate and bladder wall for BPH and urothelial carcinoma of bladder wall, respectively, six years prior. A revision of transurethral resection of bladder wall for the urothelial carcinoma was done again five months prior. He was otherwise a moderately built adult with normal nutritional status. He had no underlying comorbid conditions such as diabetes or hypertension. During the present admission, for the above complaints, a revision of transurethral resection of bladder wall was planned. An early morning urine sample was collected and a urine culture was sent as a part of preoperative work up to the Department of Microbiology.

The urine was macroscopically turbid with no gross haematuria. The wet mount microscopy of the uncentrifuged urine revealed more than 25 pus cells and less than five epithelial cells per high power field. The Gram stain showed two to three pus cells with Gram negative rods per oil immersion field. The urine sample was plated onto Cysteine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient (CLED) medium and blood agar (Hi-Media). After incubation at 37°C for 24 hours aerobically, CLED medium showed growth of white colonies, whereas the blood agar showed white haemolytic colonies and translucent colonies around them with the colony count of 105 CFU/mL (Colony Forming Unit) of each of the two [Table/Fig-1]. The translucent colonies grew around the white haemolytic colonies but did not grow independently of the white colonies suggestive of satellitism.

Blood agar plate demonstrating the phenomenon of satellitism.

On further processing white colonies were found to be catalase positive, oxidase negative, slide and tube coagulase positive, and thus identified as Staphylococcus aureus [1]. The translucent colonies showed satellitism, fermented xylose and glucose, and thus identified as Haemophilus influenzae [1]. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method as per the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines 2017 [2]. The Haemophilus isolate was sensitive to all the antibiotics tested viz., amoxicillin clavulanate (20/10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg) and tetracycline (30 μg). The Staphylococcus aureus isolate was sensitive to cefoxitin (24 mm), nitrofurantoin (19 mm) and ciprofloxacin (22 mm) among the antibiotics tested viz., penicillin (10 U), tetracycline (30 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 U), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and cefoxitin (30 μg). No further confirmation of the Haemophilus species was done due to non availability of X and V discs. The patient was treated with nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily for seven days and over 48 hours, he improved symptomatically. Urine culture repeated after one week of treatment was found to be sterile.

Discussion

Haemophilus species are rare pathogens among the causative agents of UTI. They are more commonly reported in children [3]. Among adults, they have been reported to cause UTI in elderly males with urogenital abnormalities [4]. The index patient also was an elderly male with structural problems of the urinary tract (urothelial carcinoma of bladder and BPH) which would have predisposed to Haemophilus influenzae UTI. One reason that has been suggested for the rare occurrence of Haemophilus UTI is that the media routinely used in most of the laboratories for work up of a patient with UTI do not favour its growth. Thus, the true incidence remains unstudied. Although, no selective media was used for plating the urine of the index patient, since Staphylococcus aureus was a copathogen, Haemophilus was able to grow on the blood agar, as the required X and V factor could have been provided by the Staphylococcus aureus. If not for the copathogen, in the index case, Haemophilus would not have been isolated from the urine.

Although, reported to cause infections of the genito urinary tract such as prostatitis epididymo-orchitis in children and elderly males with obstructive uropathy and other urogenital abnormalities, the exact uropathogenesis of Haemophilus species remains enigmatic [4-7]. Analysing the reported cases of Haemophilus influenzae causing UTIs, it is evident that most of the affected patients have an underlying urogenital abnormality. Also most of the isolates were pathogens invading from blood stream, and were non typable [8]. Among the affected women where invasive infection was reported, pregnancy was a risk factor in majority of cases [8]. In the present case, the mode of entry could not be established. Also, the coinfection with Staphylococcus aureus has been reported for the first time.

The exact prevalence of UTI casued by Haemophilus may be underestimated as it is not a routine practice to include chocolate agar for urine culture. Hence, to understand the real burden of UTI due to Haemophilus species, this report would also support the routine use of special media (e.g., chocolate agar) for plating urine in UTI occurring in a targeted population i.e., children, pregnant women, elderly males or persons with structural problems of the urinary tract [9]. Studies carried out in this regard would help us to understand the incidence and risk factors of UTI caused by Haemophilus species. This would also pave way for understanding the uropathogenesis of these organisms.

Conclusion

Haemophilus species although rare, can cause UTI. Exact burden of the disease and pathogenesis, still remains to be studied. Regular use of chocolate agar may be considered for processing urine samples in specific populations like children, pregnant women, people with structural anomalies of the urinary tract and elderly people.

References

[1]Bergey D, Whitamn W, Parte A, Goodfellow M, Rainey F, Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology 2005 Volume 22nd edNew yorkSpringer:851-53.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Wayne PA, Performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing 2017 27th edCLSI supplement M100-S27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute  [Google Scholar]

[3]Leskovar V, Mlinari-Dzepina A, Marijan T, Vranes J, Frequency of Haemophilus spp. in urinary and and genital tract samples Med Glas (Zenica) 2010 7:66-71.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Al-Mohizea MM, Alotaibi FE, An unusual case of chronic prostatitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae in an elderly Saudi patient: A case report and literature review J Fam Community Med 2014 21:193-95.10.4103/2230-8229.14297525374472  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Cross JT, Davidson KW, Bradsher RW, Haemophilus influenzae epididymo-orchitis and bacteremia in a man infected with the human immunodeficiency virus Clin Infect Dis 1994 19:768-69.10.1093/clinids/19.4.7687803647  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Ariza Jiménez AB, Moreno-Perez D, Núñez Cuadros E, Urda Cardona A, Invasive disease caused by Haemophilusparainfluenzae III in a child with uropathy J Med Microbiol 2013 62:792-93.10.1099/jmm.0.047225-023412773  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Allard L, Joly-Guillou M-L, Champion G, Urinary tract infection caused by Haemophilus influenzae in 3 children with uropathies Arch Pediatr Organe Off Soc Francaise Pediatr 2012 19:842-46.10.1016/j.arcped.2012.05.01622795780  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Fujii M, Gomi H, Ishioka H, Takamura N, Bacteremic renal stone-associated urinary tract infection caused by nontypable Haemophilus influenzae: A rare invasive disease in an immunocompetent patient ID Cases 2016 7:11-13.10.1016/j.idcr.2016.11.00527920983  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Dingle TC, Clarridge JE, Clinical significance and characterization of haemophilus influenzae type b genogroup isolates from urine samples in an adult male population J Clin Microbiol 2014 52:1745-48.10.1128/JCM.00506-1424599984  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]