JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Microbiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34188.11301
Year : 2018 | Month : Mar | Volume : 12 | Issue : 03 Full Version Page : DC01 - DC05

Molecular Characterisation of Fungi from Mycotic Keratitis and Invasive Infections and Comparison with Conventional Methods

Deepankar Srigyan1, Himanshu Sekhar Behera2, Gita Satpathy3, Nishat Hussain Ahmed4, Namrata Sharma5, Radhika Tandon6, Immaculata Xess7, Jeewan Singh Titiyal8

1 Junior Resident, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
2 PhD Student, Department of Ocular Microbiology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
5 Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
6 Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
7 Professor, Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
8 Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Gita Satpathy, Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology and Professor Incharge, Ocular Microbiology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, Delhi, India.
E-mail: gita.satpathy@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Fungi can cause systemic or localised infections in human beings, among which mycotic keratitis and Invasive Fungal Infections (IFIs) are very important, which can lead to severe complications and fatal consequences. In some instances, fungal culture isolates may not be identified accurately on the basis of morphology and microscopy. In those cases, molecular characterisation of isolates becomes more helpful in identification, which is essential for providing appropriate antifungal therapy and avoiding bad prognosis.

Aim

To identify the fungi collected from patients of mycotic keratitis and IFIs (diagnosed by conventional methods) using molecular methods and to compare the results with the results of conventional methods of identification.

Materials and Methods

In the present prospective study, fungal culture isolates were taken from 24 keratomycosis and seven IFIs patients (diagnosed by conventional methods) reporting to the OPD and wards of AIIMS Hospital, Delhi, India (March 2016 to March 2017). Isolates were further subcultured for DNA isolation and amplification for the variable ITS1 and ITS2 regions, and processed for nucleotide sequencing. The obtained sequences for ITS1 and ITS2 regions were searched for homology with NCBI-BLAST program. Results of molecular diagnosis at species level were compared with the conventional methods.

Results

Conventional methods could identify Fusarium spp., Alternaria spp., Bipolaris spp., Cladosporium spp., Penicillium spp., Rhizopus spp., up to genus level only, which could be further identified up to species level by molecular methods. Phenotypically identified isolates of Acremonium spp. was identified as Simplicillium spp., Alternaria spp. as Chaetomium globosum, Mucor spp. as Rhizopus oryzae by molecular methods.

Conclusion

As prognosis and therapy varies among different genera of fungi and in some cases from species to species, correct species level identification is important; hence, molecular methods may be complemented to traditional methods. Identification of rare fungal isolates is also important in clinical mycology, so that they will not be discarded as contaminants, which is possible using molecular techniques.

Keywords

Introduction

Fungal corneal infection or “mycotic keratitis” is a major cause of preventable blindness especially in tropical and sub tropical countries. In India, about 60,000 cases of mycotic keratitis and about 10,000 resultant corneal transplants occur each year [1,2]. The reported incidence of mycotic keratitis is 17-36% worldwide, whereas, it is about 44-47% in India [3-6]. Corneal trauma with plant or animal materials or dust particles due to either agricultural activity or animal husbandry, blocked nasolacrimal duct, poor hygienic practice of soft contact lens are the most common predisposing factors of keratomycosis [7,8]. Majority of the patients come from rural areas [7]. Fungal keratitis or keratomycosis, without early and prompt treatment, may lead to either loss of vision or severe visual impairment [2,3]. In contrast to bacterial keratitis, signs and symptoms of mycotic keratitis are mild and moderate in the early stage due to mild degree of inflammation; but, later on it leads to suppuration and ulceration [1].

Invasive fungal infections cause severe illness in the patients. IFIs are predominantly seen in immunocompromised individuals, but several cases were also reported in immunocompetent individuals [9,10]. Patients with IFIs show signs and symptoms of febrile illness that continue even after prolonged broad spectrum antibiotics treatment and lesions are visible in radiology report [9]. Systemic predisposing factors like diabetes, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, cancer and treatment for a bacterial infection with antibiotics or steroids influence the occurrence of IFIs [10]. As the number of reported cases of IFIs are few and data is scanty, exact prevalence from India is hard to define. Early and accurate diagnosis with proper treatment is essential for preventing morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Fungal species make up for nearly 7% (611,000 species) of all eukaryotic species on earth and are widely distributed in plant debris, soil, dust and other organic substrates among which about 600 species are human pathogens [11,12]. Although, more than 105 species of fungi are known to cause eye infections, majority are caused by members of Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp. across India and South East Asia, among which, Aspergillus spp. was reported as the most predominate and prevalent one in Northern India [13,14]. The other commonly isolated filamentous fungi from fungal corneal infections are Alternaria spp., Penicillium spp. and Curvularia spp. [1]. Opportunistic yeasts like Candida specially C. tropicalis and C. albicans or filamentous fungi like Aspergillus spp. are the most predominant genera of fungus involved in IFIs in India and worldwide [15,16]. Other fungi such as Fusarium, Trichosporon and Malassezia spp., which were previously considered as non-pathogenic for humans or causing diseases sporadically are now considered as leading fungal pathogens for IFIs [15,16].

Keratomycosis and IFIs can be misdiagnosed leading to severe complications. In the early stage when symptoms are mild; accurate and rapid diagnosis is the key feature for the management of fungal keratitis and invasive infections. Previously, the laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis and IFIs were only made by direct microscopy of corneal scraping, tissues or body fluids with Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) mount and isolation in culture [17]. As the sensitivity of direct microscopy is low, the staining with calcofluor white and blankophor increases the sensitivity to some extent [18]. Culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis of fungal keratitis and IFIs [19]. In some cases, fungal culture isolates may not be identified accurately on the basis of morphology and microscopy. In case of keratomycosis or infections by highly invasive fungi like Pythium spp., the fungus can be misidentified as contaminant or Aspergillus spp. leading to incorrect therapy and severe morbidity, sometimes with fatal consequences. In those cases, molecular characterisation of isolates become more helpful in identification, which is essential for providing appropriate antifungal therapy and avoiding bad prognosis [20].

The present study aims to identify the fungi collected from the patients of fungal keratitis and IFIs (diagnosed by conventional methods) using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay for both ITS regions of ribosomal RNA, nucleotide sequencing, analysis using National Center for Biotechnology Information-Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (NCBI-BLAST) against available data base in gene bank and to compare the results with the results of conventional methods of identification (direct microscopy and phenotypic identification from culture isolates).

Materials and Methods

Fungal Culture Isolates

A prospective study conducted over a period of one year (March 2016 to March 2017) was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), Delhi, India. The fungal culture isolates on Sabouraud’s Dextrose Agar (SDA) (only filamentous fungi) from corneal scrapings of 24 keratomycosis patients (diagnosed by conventional methods) attending the OPD/ causality services of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS. Fungal isolates (only filamentous fungi) from seven IFI patients (diagnosed by conventional methods) admitted to different wards of the AIIMS hospital were included in this study. Patients of clinically suspected fungal keratitis and invasive infections by filamentous fungi were included in this study. Patients of either Acanthamoeba keratitis, bacterial keratitis or viral keratitis and IFI patients with yeast infections were excluded from this pilot study. The age of the patients of keratomycosis ranged from 6-79 years with the mean age of 39 years with predominance of male patients were 22 (92%). The age of the patients of IFIs varied from 24-52 years with the mean age of 39 years out of which 3 (43%) were males and 4 (57%) were females. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical clearance of the institute. The fungal culture isolates were sub-cultured on SDA (HiMedia, India) with antibiotic gentamicin (0.02 mg/mL). Two tubes were taken per isolate, among which one was incubated at 25°C and other at 37°C, till the growth appeared [21,22].

Macroscopic and Microscopic Examination of the Culture

The culture slants were examined for morphological features, color, texture, diffusible pigments and spore features etc. Lactophenol Cotton Blue (LPCB) mount was prepared and visualised under a light microscope with 10X and 40X objectives for microscopic examination [23].

Molecular Methods

DNA isolation from fungal culture isolates: DNA was isolated from the 31 fungal culture isolates using the protocol described by Lee SB et al., with slight modifications [24]. Briefly, primary fungal culture isolates obtained from the patients were further subcultured on SDA plates, and kept in an incubator at 25°C and 37°C for at least 7-10 days until a full grown fungal mat was seen over the agar surface. Mycelial mat of approximately 0.3-0.5 gm was taken in a sterile mortar; liquid nitrogen was added and grounded quickly to prepare fine powder using a pestle. Fungal powder of about 0.2-0.3 gm was transferred to sterile 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and 600 μL of ATL lysis buffer (QIAGEN, Germany) was added. Microcentrifuge tubes were vortexed briefly and incubated at 65°C for three hours. Lysis buffer AL (200 μL) (QIAGEN, Germany) and 20 μL of proteinase K was added to the tubes, vortexed and incubated at 56°C for one hour followed by at 70°C for 10 minutes. About 4 μL of RNase A (10 mg/mL) (QIAGEN, Germany) was added to the tubes; incubated at 37°C for one hour to digest the contaminating RNA. Lysed solution was mixed with 200 μL of 100% ethanol and incubated for two minutes at room temperature. The solution was transferred to QIAamp mini-spin column (QIAGEN, Germany) and centrifuged at 8000 rpm for one minute. Tubes were washed with 500 μL of washing buffer AW1 followed by AW2 with centrifugation at 8000 rpm for one minute each. DNA was eluted with 100 μL of elution buffer AE (QIAGEN, Germany) and stored at -20°C for PCR assay.

PCR assay for molecular diagnosis: PCR assay for amplification of the genus specific Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions ITS1 and ITS2 of ribosomal DNA (~280 bp) was standardised with published primers {ITS1 region: FP: (5’-TCC GTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) that hybridises at the end of 18S rDNA and RP: ITS86 (5’-GTTCAAAGATTCGATGATTCAC-3’) hybridises with the 5.8S rDNA region} and {ITS2 region: FP: ITS86 (5’-GTGAATCATCGAATCTTTGAA C-3’) that hybridises with the 5.8S rDNA region and RP: ITS4: (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) which hybridizes at the beginning of 28S rDNA} by changing the concentration of MgCl2 and annealing temperature until specific bands were visualised in 1.5% agarose gel [25-27]. Briefly, the protocol standardised for the PCR assay was as follows: a reaction mixture of 20 μL was prepared with 1X reaction buffer (Fermentas), 2.5 mm MgCl2, 200 μm Deoxyribonucleotide Triphosphates (dNTPs) (Fermentas), 0.4 μm forward and reverse primers (IDT), 1.25 U Taq polymerase (Fermentas, USA) and milliQ water q.s. Final reaction volume of 25 μL was made with 5 μL of extracted fungal DNA (~0.5 ng). PCR assay was performed in a thermal cycler (Applied Bio system, USA) with the temperature profile: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, primer annealing at 52°C for 30 seconds (ITS1 region) and 54°C (ITS2 region), strand elongation at 72°C for 30 seconds for 35 cycles, with the final elongation at 72°C for 10 minutes. Reaction mixture with 5 μL distilled water was used as a negative control and reaction mixture with DNA isolated from known isolates of Aspergillus flavus was used as a positive control in the PCR assay. Amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel and visualised under a gel documentation system (Syngene, USA).

Sequencing and sequence homology analysis: Amplified DNA bands for ITS1 and ITS2 regions were cut from the agarose gel and DNA was extracted using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Nucleotide sequences of the purified DNA were determined commercially (Biolink, India) using primers ITS1 and ITS4 (sequences described earlier). Nucleotide sequences of ITS1 and ITS2 regions were searched for homology analysis with available sequences found in the Gene bank with NCBI BLAST computer program (NCBI, USA). Nucleotide sequences of both ITS1 and ITS2 regions from 31 culture isolates were submitted in the NCBI databank (NCBI, USA) (Nucleotide sequence accession numbers are given in results).

Results

Of the 31 fungal culture isolates, visual and microscopic examinations could identify 22 isolates up to genus level and nine isolates up to species level [Table/Fig-1]. Amplified PCR products for the ITS1 and ITS2 regions when electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel shows bands of approximately 280 bp length when visualised with a gel documentation system [Table/Fig-2,3]. Nucleotide sequences submitted to the NCBI databank are now available with the accession numbers MF000891-MF000910 and MF033427-MF033435 for ITS1 region and MF000921-MF000940 and MF033438-MF033445) for ITS2 region [Table/Fig-1]. Of the 31 fungal culture isolates taken for sequencing to reach species level identification, eight were identified as Aspergillus flavus, one as Aspergillus fumigatus, four as Cladosporium cladosporioides, three as Simplicillium spp., three as Fusarium solani, one as Fusarium equiseti, three as Alternaria tenuissima, one as Alternaria alternata, two as Penicillium chrysogenum, one as Penicillium citrinum, one as Rhizopus microsporus, one as Rhizopus oryzae, one as Bipolaris sorokiniana and one as Chaetomium globosum. In five instances, fungal isolates identified by molecular methods were different from conventional methods [Table/Fig-1].

Details of 31 fungal isolates with accession numbers obtained from NCBI.

S. No. of PatientsNature of specimenFungus identified by conventional cultureFungus identified by sequencing and NCBI-BLASTAccession numbers obtained (NCBI) (ITS1 and ITS2)Identity (%)Accession numbers showing highest similarity
1Corneal scrapingAcremonium spp.Simplicillium spp.MF000891 and MF00092199%KX020567, KX020563
2Corneal scrapingAspergillus fumigatusAspergillus fumigatusMF000892 and MF00092299%KU743889, JN226978
3Corneal scrapingAcremonium spp.Simplicillium spp.MF033427 and MF03343899%KT318874, KP184323
4Corneal scrapingFusarium spp.Fusarium solaniMF000893 and MF00092399%GQ451337, GQ121291
5Corneal scrapingBipolaris spp.Bipolaris sorokinianaMF033428 (ITS1)98%KU870641, KT310049
6Corneal scrapingAspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF000894 and MF00092499%LN482517, LN482514
7Corneal scrapingAlternaria spp.Chaetomium globosumMF000895 and MF00092599%KU936228, KP281435
8Corneal scrapingCladosporium spp.Cladosporium cladosporioidesMF000896 and MF00092696%MF000907, MF000906
9Corneal scrapingAspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF033439 (ITS2)99%KR611594, JQ781721
10Corneal scrapingFusarium spp.Fusarium solaniMF033440 (ITS2)99%KR527137, KY848498
11Invasive (Tissue)Fusarium spp.Fusarium equisetiMF000897 and MF000927100%KR812230, KJ677237
12Corneal scrapingPenicillium spp.Penicillium chrysogenumMF000898 and MF00092899%MF000902, KX901289
13Corneal scrapingAlternaria spp.Alternaria tenuissimaMF033429 (ITS1)100%KR709011, KR912298
14Corneal scrapingAlternaria spp.Alternaria tenuissimaMF000899 and MF000929100%HQ647307, KU508797
15Corneal scrapingAlternaria spp.Alternaria alternataMF033430 and MF03344199%MF040794, MF168401
16Corneal scrapingAspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF000900 and MF00093099%KU561920, KU561919
17Corneal scrapingAcremonium spp.Simplicillium spp.MF000901 and MF00093199%KX020567, KX020563
18Invasive (Aspirate)Penicillium spp.Penicillium chrysogenumMF000902 and MF00093299%KU982597, JF807949
19Corneal scrapingAspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF000903 and MF00093399%KP296143, KX345284
20Corneal scrapingAlternaria spp.Alternaria tenuissimaMF000904 and MF000934100%LT799975, KX064997
21Corneal scrapingFusarium spp.Fusarium solaniMF000905 and MF00093599%GQ451337, GQ121291
22Corneal scrapingCladosporium spp.Cladosporium cladosporioidesMF000906 and MF00093699%JN227029, KX960912
23Corneal scrapingCladosporium spp.Cladosporium cladosporioidesMF000907 and MF00093799%KP689250, KF876823
24Invasive (Tissue)Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF033431 and MF03344299%MF163443, MF120213
25Invasive (Tissue)Rhizopus spp.Rhizopus microsporusMF033432 (ITS1)99%KJ408570, KM527225
26Invasive (Tissue)Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF000908 and MF00093899%HM560052, HM560051
27Corneal scrapingAspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF033433 and MF033443100%MF033444, MF033443
28Invasive (BAL)Penicillium spp.Penicillium citrinumMF000909 and MF00093999%KY754577, KX363454
29Invasive (Tissue)Mucor spp.Rhizopus oryzaeMF000910 and MF00094099%KX685359, FJ433877
30Corneal scrapingAspergillus flavusAspergillus flavusMF033434 and MF033444100%MF033444, MF033443
31Corneal scrapingCladosporium spp.Cladosporium cladosporioidesMF033435 and MF033445100%KJ728689, KJ410037

PCR assay showing the amplification of ITS1 region (~270 bp) of fungus.

PCR assay showing the amplification of ITS2 region (~280 bp) of fungus.

Nucleotide sequences of Aspergillus flavus (n=8) from conventional culture share 100%/99% identity with Aspergillus flavus by sequencing and NCBI-BLAST (accession numbers: LN482517, LN482514, LN482513, KR611594, JQ781721, FJ011545). Similarly, Aspergillus fumigatus (n=1) from conventional culture shares 99% identity with Aspergillus fumigatus (accession numbers: KU743889, JN226978, JX469423). All three Cladosporium spp. share 100%/99% identity with Cladosporium cladosporioides (KJ728689, KP689250, KX610162). All the three Acremonium spp. share 99% identity with Simplicillium spp. (KX020567, KX020563, KP184324). Of the four Fusarium spp., three share 99% identity with Fusarium solani (GQ451337, GQ121291, KX381129) and one shares 100% identity with Fusarium equiseti (KR812230, KJ677237, KJ677236). Of the five Alternaria spp., three share 100% identity with Alternaria tenuissima (HQ647307, KU508797, KX064997), one shares 99% identity with Alternaria alternata (MF040794, MF168401, MF167641) and one shares 99% identity with Chaetomium globosum (KU936228, KP281435, JX406510). Of the three Penicillium spp., two share 99% identity with Penicillium chrysogenum (MF000902, KX901289, KU743900) and one shares 99% identity with Penicillium citrinum (KY754577, KX363454, KX363446). Rhizopus spp. (n=1) shares 99% identity with Rhizopus microsporus (KJ408570, KM527225, KM527224). Mucor spp. (n=1) shares 99% identity with Rhizopus oryzae (KX685359, FJ433877, KY244030) and Bipolaris spp. (n=1) shares 98% identity with Bipolaris sorokiniana (KU870641, KT310049, KF922886).

Discussion

Keratomycosis is one of the most frequently encountered ophthalmic infections in tropical and sub tropical countries like India, caused by a variety of fungal species including opportunistic fungal pathogens and in some instances by these, previously classified as contaminant fungi [28]. IFIs are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients [9,10]. Accurate identification of fungi to the species level holds an importance in developing countries like India, where fungal infections are more common and correct choice of antimicrobial therapy requires fungal infections to be distinguished from other microbial aetiology. As identification of the causative fungi with conventional culture needs more than a week, rapid and high throughput molecular diagnostic tools like PCR assay and sequencing are very helpful for species level identification either from culture isolates or directly from clinical specimens for correct treatment [26]. In this pilot study, we have identified the pathogenic fungi to species level from culture positive clinical isolates to guide better therapy for the management of infections. Some fungal isolates could be fully identified by conventional methods such as visual and microscopic morphological examinations. Correct identification is important because treatment varies among different genus of fungi and in some cases from species to species, as relatively high Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of amphotericin B and itraconazole are needed for F. solani compared to F. oxysporum [29].

Fungal species identification is based on the variation in nucleotide sequences of the variable ITS1 and ITS2 regions of ribosomal DNA (rDNA). As 28S, 18S and 5.8S rRNA are the conserved regions of fungal ribosomal DNA, these are often used for designing forward and reverse primers to amplify the inner variable regions in PCR assay. ITS1 and ITS2 regions can be amplified jointly with forward primer ITS1 and reverse primer ITS4, which is about 560 bp in length, but it has some limitations due to “chimera formation”. To avoid such type of limitations, these targets (ITS1 and ITS2) can be amplified separately for species level identification [26,30,31].

Among Aspergillus species, A. flavus is the predominant fungi causing mycotic keratitis and second only to A. fumigatus as a cause of human invasive infections [32,33]. In this pilot study, it was also reported that, of the total seven Aspergillus spp. isolates from mycotic keratitis patients, six were A. flavus and only one was A. fumigatus which corroborates with the previous studies.

The species of Simplicillium is considered as coincidental opportunistic pathogen to humans and animals as it occurs in a wide range of ecological niches, such as soil, mushroom, diseased plant tissue, rust, nematode, dog tissue and human nails [34]. Acremonium spp. is morphologically similar to Simplicillium spp. where the isolates do not produce their distinctive macroconidia. Some of the species of Simplicillium such as Simplicillium obclavatum, originally described as Acremonium obclavatum, which makes it difficult to differentiate between them by conventional methods [35,36]. Therefore, genus level identification of both the fungus is difficult exclusively on morphological characteristics and there is always a possibility of misidentification. Hence, molecular identification may be performed as a complementary test to avoid such type of misdiagnosis. In this study, phenotypically identified all three isolates of Acremonium spp. was identified as Simplicillium spp. by molecular methods.

Cladosporium spp. was considered as a coincidental opportunistic pathogen, causing mycotic keratitis and some cutaneous and subcutaneous infections [37]. Cladosporium cladosporioides is a very rare pigmented fungi with few reported cases of keratomycosis [2]. In some case reports from Asian and African countries, corneal keratomycosis resulting from Cladosporium cladosporioides had been reported [38-40]. In the present study, we found four isolates of Cladosporium cladosporioides with PCR assay and sequencing from mycotic keratitis patients which were reported as Cladosporium spp. with traditional mycological diagnostic method.

A study from India reported the incidence of Alternaria spp. in mycotic keratitis patients as 3.3-10.4% [41]. Among all Alternaria spp., A. alternata and A. tenuissima are more common in ocular infections [41]. In the present study, we found one isolate of A. alternata and three isolates of A. tenuissima, which corroborates with the previous studies. Alternaria spp. and Chaetomium spp. both belong to dematiaceous moulds, so they can be misidentified by conventional methods. In the present study, one isolate which was identified as Alternaria spp. by conventional methods, later characterised as Chaetomium globosum by molecular methods. Association of Chaetomium globosum was already reported with keratomycosis [42].

Species level identification of Zygomycetes by standard mycological methods always remains a difficult and time-consuming task, which requires an expertise that is restricted to few reference laboratories. DNA typing to differentiate between the species among Zygomycetes is particularly important in those cases where these fungi differ in their susceptibility to antifungal drugs. The two most common pathogenic species of Rhizopus i.e., R. oryzae and R. microsporus, which are difficult to differentiate phenotypically, could be clearly differentiated from each other genotypically, as their sequences showed only 70% similarity [43]. In the present study, we found one Rhizopus microsporus from tissue specimen, which was earlier reported as Rhizopus spp. Another invasive fungal isolate which was misidentified as Mucor spp. by conventional methods was identified as Rhizopus oryzae with molecular diagnosis. These molecular typing results hold importance in differentiating between different species of Zygomycetes to start an appropriate antifungal therapy. Hence, molecular diagnosis is useful for species identification within Zygomycetes from culture isolates.

Studies from South India and central China reported Fusarium spp. as the most common cause of mycotic keratitis; among which F. solani is the most predominant one [28,44]. Few cases of F. equiseti infections were also reported in some parts of the world [45,46]. In the present study, we had reported three F. solani and one F. equiseti isolates from fungal infections by nucleotide sequencing, which suggests that, F. solani is most prevalent among all Fusarium spp. causing eye infections.

This study presented a standardised rapid and high throughput technique (PCR assay) for the detection and identification of fungi in ocular and invasive samples. It consists of a sensitive, precise, rapid but relatively expensive method of identification of fungi based on the amplification of ITS1 and ITS2 regions and sequencing. There are several species within a genus that differ in their susceptibility to antifungal drugs, in those instances molecular typing by PCR assay can give guidance for better therapy to manage such infections. Molecular assays are neither been widely used nor widely available. There is a need for widespread use of molecular assays for correct identification, so that some fungal isolates will not be discarded as contaminants. Misidentification of rare isolates can be avoided by using molecular techniques.

Limitation

The present study included culture isolates of filamentous fungi only. IFIs due to Candida spp. could also have been included.

Conclusion

Molecular diagnosis with PCR assay can be an important complement to conventional culture methods (gold standard) and may constitute a rapid and high throughput means of fungal identification, which is becoming very important in clinical mycology. As the cost of PCR assay to diagnose infections generally exceeds that of conventional culture, which limits its widespread use, especially in low income countries like India, it should be implemented at least in reference centers for a definitive diagnosis and treatment.

References

[1]Thomas PA, Kaliamurthy J, Mycotic keratitis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management Clin Microbiol Infect 2013 19(3):210-20.10.1111/1469-0691.1212623398543  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Chowdhary A, Singh K, Spectrum of fungal keratitis in North India Cornea 2005 1:8-15.10.1097/01.ico.0000126435.25751.2015604861  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Rosa RH, Miller D, Alfonso EC, The changing spectrum of fungal keratitis in South Florida Ophthalmol 1994 101(6):1005-13.10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31225-5  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C, Cevallos V, Mascarenhas JM, Asokan B, Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, South India Br J Ophthalmol 1997 81:965-71.10.1136/bjo.81.11.9659505820   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Dunlop AA, Wright ED, Howlader SA, Nazrul I, Husain R, McClellan K, Suppurative corneal ulceration in Bangladesh. A study of 142 cases examining the microbiological diagnosis, clinical diagnosis, and epidemiological features of bacterial and fungal keratitis Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1994 22:105-10.10.1111/j.1442-9071.1994.tb00775.x7917262  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Upadhyay MP, Karmacharya PC, Koirala S, Tuladhar NR, Bryan LE, Smolin G, Epidemiologic characteristics, predisposing factors, and aetiologic diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Nepal Am J Ophthalmol 1991 111:92-99.10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76903-X  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[7]Tilak R, Singh A, Maurya OP, Chandra A, Tilak V, Gulati AK, Mycotic keratitis in India: a five-year retrospective study J Infect Dev Ctries 2010 4(3):171-74.10.3855/jidc.30920351459  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Vasu S, Meenakshi R, Palaniappan R, Epidemiological characteristics and laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis: a three-year study Indian J Ophthalmol 2003 51(4):315-21.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Ramana KV, Kandi S, Bharatkumar V, Sharada CH, Rao R, Mani R, Invasive fungal infections: a comprehensive review Am J Infect Dis Microbiol 2013 1(4):64-69.10.12691/ajidm-1-4-2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[10]Xie GH, Fang XM, Fang Q, Wu XM, Jin YH, Wang JL, Impact of invasive fungal infection on outcomes of severe sepsis: a multicenter matched cohort study in critically ill surgical patients Crit Care 2008 12:R510.1186/cc676618199317  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AG, Worm B, How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol 2011 9(8):e100112710.1371/journal.pbio.100112721886479  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Brown GD, Denning DW, Levitz SM, Tackling human fungal infections Science 2012 336:64710.1126/science.122223622582229  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Rautaraya B, Sharma S, Kar S, Das S, Sahu SK, Diagnosis and treatment outcome of mycotic keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in Eastern India BMC Ophthalmol 2011 11:3910.1186/1471-2415-11-3922188671  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Chander J, Singla N, Agnihotri N, Arya SK, Deep A, Keratomycosis in and around Chandigarh: a five-year study from a north Indian tertiary care hospital Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008 51(2):304-06.10.4103/0377-4929.4170018603719  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Jorda-Marcos R, Alvarez-Lerma F, Jurado M, Palomar M, Nolla-Salas J, Leon MA, Risk factors for candidemia in critically ill patients: a prospective surveillance study Mycoses 2007 50:302-10.10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01366.x17576324  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Singh T, Kashyap AK, Ahluwalia G, Chinna D, Sidhu SS, Epidemiology of fungal infections in critical care setting of atertiary care teaching hospital in North India: a prospective surveillance study J Clin Sci Res 2014 3:14-25.10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.13.050  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[17]Vengayil S, Panda A, Satpathy G, Nayak N, Ghosh S, Patanaik D, Polymerase chain reaction-guided diagnosis of mycotic keratitis: a prospective evaluation of its efficacy and limitations Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009 50:152-56.10.1167/iovs.07-128318689703  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Chander J, Chakrabarti A, Sharma A, Saini JS, Panigarhi D, Evaluation of calcofluor staining in the diagnosis of fungal corneal ulcer Mycoses 1993 36(7-8):243-45.10.1111/j.1439-0507.1993.tb00758.x7509453  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Byrne KA, Burd EM, Tabbara KF, Hyndiuk RA, Diagnostic microbiology and cytology of the eye 1995 Boston, MAButterworth-Heinemann:94-104.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Krajaejun T, Pracharktam R, Wongwaisayawan S, Rochanawutinon M, Kunakorn M, Kunavisarut S, Ocular pythiosis: is it under-diagnosed? Am J Ophthalmol 2004 137(2):370-72.10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00908-5  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[21]Das S, Sharma S, Kar S, Sahu SK, Samal B, Mallick A, Is inclusion of sabouraud dextrose agar essential for the laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis? Indian J Ophthalmol 2010 58(4):281-85.10.4103/0301-4738.6412220534916  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Basu S, Bose C, Ojha N, Das N, Das J, Pal M, Evolution of bacterial and fungal growth media Bioinformation 2015 11(4):182-84.10.6026/9732063001118226124557  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Thomas PA, Kuriakose T, Kirupashanker MP, Maharajan VS, Use of lactophenol cotton blue mounts of corneal scrapings as an aid to the diagnosis of mycotic keratitis Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1991 14(3):219-24.10.1016/0732-8893(91)90035-E  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[24]Lee SB, Milgroom MG, Taylor JW, A rapid, high yield mini-prep method for isolation of total genomic DNA from fungi Fungal Genetics Newsletter 1988 35:23-24.10.4148/1941-4765.1531  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[25]Sugita C, Makimura K, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H, Nagai A, PCR identification system for the genus Aspergillus and three major pathogenic species: Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger Med Mycol 2004 42(5):433-37.10.1080/1369378031000165678615552645  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Ferrer C, Colom F, Frases S, Detection and identification of fungal pathogens by PCR and by ITS2 and 5.8S ribosomal DNA typing in ocular infections J Clin Microbiol 2001 39(8):2873-79.10.1128/JCM.39.8.2873-2879.200111474006  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Lott TF, Burns BM, Zancope-Oliveira R, Elie CM, Reiss E, Sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) form yeast species within the genus Candida Curr Microbiol 1998 36:63-69.10.1007/s0028499002809425241  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Garg P, Gopinath G, Choudhary K, Rao GN, Keratomycosis: clinical and microbiological experience with dematiaceous fungi Ophthalmol 2000 107(3):574-80.10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00079-2  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[29]Nucci M, Anaissie E, Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients Clin Microbiol Rev 2007 20(4):695-704.10.1128/CMR.00014-0717934079  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Ferrer C, Munoz G, Alio JL, Abad JL, Colon F, Polymerase chain reaction diagnosis in fungal keratitis caused by Alternaria alternata Amer J Ophthalmol 2002 33:398-99.10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01329-0  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[31]Nilsson RH, Tedersoo L, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Hartmann M, Unterseher M, A Comprehensive, automatically updated fungal ITS sequence dataset for reference-based chimera control in environmental sequencing efforts Microbes and Environments 2015 30(2):145-50.10.1264/jsme2.ME1412125786896  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Denning DW, Invasive aspergillosis Clin Infect Dis 1998 26(4):781-803.10.1086/5139439564455  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Thomas PA, Fungal infections of the cornea Eye (Lond) 2003 17(8):852-62.10.1038/sj.eye.670055714631389  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Zare R, Gams W, A revision of Verticillium section Prostrata. IV. The genera Lecanicillium and Simplicillium gen Nova Hedwigia 2001 73:1-50.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Summerbell RC, Gueidan C, Schroers HJ, de Hoog GS, Starink M, Guarro J, Acremonium phylogenetic overview and revision of Gliomastix, Sarocladium, and Trichothecium Stud Mycol 2011 68:139-62.10.3114/sim.2011.68.0621523192  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[36]Liu F, Cai L, Morphological and molecular characterization of a novel species of Simplicillium from China Cryptogamie, Mycologie 2012 33(2):1-13.10.7872/crym.v33.iss2.2012.137  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[37]Gugnani HC, Sood N, Singh B, Makkar R, Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis due to Cladosporium cladosporioides Mycoses 2000 43:85-87.10.1046/j.1439-0507.2000.00545.x10838855  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[38]Chew FL, Subrayan V, Chong PP, Goh MC, Ng KP, Cladosporium cladosporioides keratomycosis: a case report Jpn J Ophthalmol 2009 53(6):657-59.10.1007/s10384-009-0722-320020251  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[39]Gugnani HC, Gupta S, Talwar RS, Role of opportunistic fungi in ocular infections in Nigeria Mycopathologia 1978 65:15510.1007/BF00447186745623  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[40]Leck AK, Thomas PA, Hagan M, Kaliamurthy J, Ackuaku E, John M, Aetiology of suppurative corneal ulcers in Ghana and south India, and epidemiology of fungal keratitis Br J Ophthalmol 2002 86:1211-15.10.1136/bjo.86.11.121112386069  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[41]Panda A, Sharma N, Gopal D, Kumar N, Satpathy G, Mycotic keratitis in children: epidemiologic and microbiologic evaluation Cornea 1997 16:295-99.10.1097/00003226-199705000-000079143801  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[42]Vanzzini Zago V, Alcantara Castro M, Naranjo Tackman R, Support of the laboratory in the diagnosis of fungal ocular infections Int J Inflam 2012 643104:1-8.10.1155/2012/64310422518339  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[43]Schwarz P, Bretagne S, Gantier JC, Garcia-Hermoso D, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Molecular identification of zygomycetes from culture and experimentally infected tissues J Clin Microbiol 2006 44(2):340-49.10.1128/JCM.44.2.340-349.200616455881  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[44]Wang L, Sun S, Jing Y, Han L, Zhang H, Yue J, Spectrum of fungal keratitis in central China Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009 37(8):763-71.10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02155.x19878220  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[45]Kiyofumi M, Ikumi S, Hiroki M, Kiyofumi O, Kazuko N, Identification and sensitivity of two rare fungal species isolated from two patients with Fusarium keratomycosis J Infect Chemother 2012 18:939-44.10.1007/s10156-012-0389-422373940  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[46]Soler C, Daban JL, Mac Nab C, Appere G, Poirier H, St. Blancart P, Fusarium equiseti: about the first case of human infection in a war casualty Aspergillus & Aspergillosis website 2012 (Accessed 26 June 2017)  [Google Scholar]